Abstract
Background
Cytosine arabinoside (Ara‐C) is a nucleoside analog prodrug utilized for immunomodulatory effects mediated by its active metabolite Ara‐CTP. Optimal dosing protocols for immunomodulation in dogs have not been defined. Cytarabine ocfosfate (CO) is a lipophilic prodrug of Ara‐C that can be administered PO and provides prolonged serum concentrations of Ara‐C.
Objectives
Provide pharmacokinetic data for orally administered CO and determine accumulation and functional consequences of Ara‐CTP within peripheral blood leukocytes.
Animals
Three healthy female hound dogs and 1 healthy male Beagle.
Methods
Prospective study. Dogs received 200 mg/m2 of CO PO q24h for 7 doses. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CO and Ara‐C concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectroscopy (LC‐MS/MS). Complete blood counts, flow cytometry, and leukocyte activation assays were done up to 21 days. Incorporation of Ara‐CTP within leukocyte DNA was determined by LC‐MS/MS.
Results
Maximum serum concentration (C max) for Ara‐C was 456.1‐724.0 ng/mL (1.88‐2.98 μM) and terminal half‐life was 23.3 to 29.4 hours. Cerebrospinal fluid: serum Ara‐C ratios ranged from 0.54 to 1.2. Peripheral blood lymphocyte concentrations remained within the reference range, but proliferation rates poststimulation were decreased at 6 days. Incorporation of Ara‐CTP was not saturated and remained >25% of peak concentration at 13 days.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Oral CO may produce prolonged serum Ara‐C half‐lives at concentrations sufficient to induce functional changes in peripheral leukocytes and is associated with prolonged retention of DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CTP. Application of functional and active metabolite assessment is feasible and may provide more relevant data to determine optimal dosing regimens for Ara‐C‐based treatments.
Keywords: Ara‐C, Ara‐CTP, canine, Cytosar, HPLC, prodrug
Abbreviations
- ANOVA
analysis of variance
- Ara‐C
cytosine arabinoside (1‐β‐d‐arabinofuranosylcytosine)
- Ara‐CDP
AraC‐diphosphate
- Ara‐CMP
AraC‐monophosphate
- Ara‐CTP
AraC‐triphosphate
- Ara‐U
1‐β‐d‐arabinofuranosyluracil
- AUC
area under the curve
- BrdU
bromodeoxyuridine
- C max
maximum serum concentration
- CNS
central nervous system
- CO
cytarabine ocfosfate
- CSF
cerebrospinal fluid
- dCK
deoxycytidine kinase
- dG
deoxyguanosine
- DNA
deoxyribonucleic acid
- ENT
equilibrative nucleoside transporter
- ISF
interstitial fluid
- LC‐MS/MS
liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry
- LOD
limit of detection
- LOQ
limit of quantification
- PBMC
peripheral blood mononuclear cell
- VCOG‐CTCAE
Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
1. INTRODUCTION
Cytarabine (1‐β‐d‐arabinofuranosylcytosine/cytosine arabinoside/Ara‐C) is a hydrophilic pyrimidine nucleoside analog of deoxycytidine commonly used to treat immune‐mediated inflammatory brain disease in dogs, and presumed to be acting by modulation of leukocyte function. The metabolism and mechanism of action of Ara‐C are complex with interplay of many factors including natural nucleotides, membrane transportation, intracellular activation, intra‐ and extra‐cellular deactivation, interaction with cellular targets, and pharmacogenomics. 1 Pyrimidine analogs are essentially prodrugs, and their plasma pharmacokinetics provide only limited data relating to efficacy. 2 , 3 , 4 The entry of Ara‐C into cells is rapid, 5 and mediated primarily by equilibrative nucleoside transporter proteins (ENT), specifically ENT1 (SLC29A1 gene). 6 It must be phosphorylated intracellularly through a pyrimidine salvage pathway to the biologically active Ara‐C‐triphosphate (Ara‐CTP) that exerts its effects after integration into DNA as Ara‐CMP (Figure 1). 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 Cytosine arabinoside is an S‐phase cell‐cycle‐specific drug 11 thought to act by inhibition of DNA polymerase, altered DNA synthesis and generation of chromosomal abnormalities, 3 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 although an AMP‐activated protein kinase mechanism 15 and alterations in phospholipid and glycoprotein metabolism also have been reported. 16 , 17 , 18 In humans, Ara‐C is rapidly converted to 1‐β‐d‐arabinofuranosyluracil (Ara‐U) by cytidine deaminase which is found at high concentrations in liver, and at lower concentrations in kidney, red blood cells, and granulocytes. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Dephosphorylation by 5′‐nucleotidase enzymes also contributes to drug deactivation.
FIGURE 1.

Schematic representation of the complex metabolic processing of cytarabine ocfosfate and cytarabine (Ara‐C) to the active Ara‐CTP metabolite through a pyrimidine salvage pathway. Equilibrative nucleoside transporter proteins (ENT) and deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) conversion of Ara‐C to Ara‐CMP are rate‐limiting steps at different serum concentrations of Ara‐C. Ara‐CTP is incorporated into DNA as Ara‐CMP and assessment of Ara‐C derived from cellular DNA is reflective of the intracellular Ara‐CTP molecules that are processed and integrated. Red arrowheads = enzymatic steps (A). Schematic representation of cytarabine ocfosfate and Ara‐C (B).
Key parameters have been described in humans defining rate‐limiting steps in the processing of Ara‐C to its active metabolites, 5 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 the nonlinear relationship between Ara‐C and Ara‐CTP, 27 , 33 , 34 and the correlation of Ara‐CTP rather than Ara‐C with clinical efficacy. 24 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 Prolonged exposure to Ara‐CTP, determined by elimination and steady‐state kinetics, may be more important than peak concentrations or area under the curve, 25 , 34 , 35 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 and in vitro, cell death correlates better with Ara‐CTP incorporation in DNA than basic cellular Ara‐CTP pools. 3 Similar data relating to key Ara‐CTP‐based parameters in dogs are lacking.
The alkyl phosphate derivative of Ara‐C, 1‐β‐d‐arabinofuranosylcytosine‐5′‐(n‐stearyl‐phosphate) (cytarabine ocfosfate (CO)/OcdP‐AraC/C18PCA/YNK01) is characterized by the addition of an 18‐carbon‐long alkyl group and is a lipophilic, PO active prodrug of cytarabine 5′‐monophosphate that is resistant to cytosine deaminase inactivation (Figure 1). 43 , 44 The combined effects of intestinal absorption, deaminase resistance, and ongoing conversion result in prolonged plasma half‐life of Ara‐C, albeit at lower concentrations. Use of CO has been reported in a single dog, 45 but no pharmacokinetic data are available. We hypothesized that PO CO would result in prolonged serum Ara‐C exposure times, accumulation of DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP, and alterations in lymphocyte subsets and functional parameters, even in the absence of lymphopenia.
Our objectives were to (1) define baseline pharmacokinetic data in dogs for an PO administered Ara‐C pro‐drug, (2) determine DNA incorporation of Ara‐CMP in peripheral blood leukocytes, and (3) determine downstream effects of Ara‐C‐based treatment on hematological variables, lymphocyte subsets, and T‐cell proliferative capacity.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A prospective pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was conducted. The research protocol was approved by the University of California, Davis Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee [protocol #18431].
2.1. Study population
One healthy male Beagle, 20 months‐old and weighing 10.8 kg, was used to provide pilot data. Three healthy female hound dogs (Marshall Farms USA Inc, New York) were studied. The hound dogs were 13 to 14 months old and weighed 17.5 to 20.8 kg. A 7‐day acclimation period was provided before the start of the study. Jugular catheters were placed under general anesthesia in all dogs 24 hours before the first dose of CO and baseline samples also were collected at this time. The dogs were examined daily and any observed adverse effects were graded according to the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG‐CTCAE) v2 (2021). 46 All dogs were neutered and adopted to permanent homes after the study was completed.
2.2. Drug administration
The pilot study dog received a single dose of 200 mg/m2 CO PO (Starasid; inactive ingredients: hydroxypropyl cellulose, D mannitol, sodium carbonate hydrate, magnesium stearate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, erythrosine, and brilliant blue FCF. Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd; Tokyo, Japan). Four weeks after the initial dose, the dog received 200 mg/m2 CO PO q24h for 3 consecutive days. Sampling times and data are found in Data S1.
Three hound dogs received 200 mg/m2 of CO PO q24h for 7 consecutive days or until the dog became leukopenic (VCOG‐CTCAE v2 Grade 2). Dogs were fasted for 12 hours before CO administration. The time of the first dose was designated time 0 and day 0.
2.3. Pharmacokinetic analysis
2.3.1. Sample collection
Blood was collected via the jugular catheter from 20 minutes (min) to 20 days (d) after administration of the first dose. Serum was separated and stored at −80°C until analyzed.
Cerebellomedullary cistern cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection was done under general anesthesia 1 day before the first CO dose and at 24 hours, and 6 days. Dogs were premedicated with butorphanol 0.2 mg/kg IM (Torbugesic, Zoetis, Parsippany‐Troy Hills, NJ) and atropine sulfate 0.02 mg/kg IM (Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Berkley Heights, NJ). General anesthesia was induced with propofol 4 to 5 mg/kg IV (Rapanofal, Ivaoes, Miami, FL) and maintained using isoflurane (Fluriso, VetOne, Boise, ID). Samples were stored at −80°C until analyzed.
2.3.2. Serum and CSF Ara‐C analysis
Quantitative analysis of Ara‐C in serum and CSF was performed by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) with Ara‐C‐13C3 as the internal standard on an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) coupled with an Acquity UPLC (Waters Milford, MA) essentially as previously described. 47 Details are found in Data S1.
2.3.3. Serum and CSF cytarabine ocfosfate analysis
The analytical reference standard for CO was obtained from Nippon Kayaku Co Ltd (Marunochi Chiyoda‐Ku, Japan), and working solutions, quality control samples, and calibration curves (0.1‐1000 ng/mL) were prepared as described above. Quantitative analysis of CO in serum and CSF was performed by LC‐MS/MS using the methodology as previously described. 48
2.3.4. Data analysis
Noncompartmental analysis was performed on serum cytarabine and CO concentrations by commercially available software (Phoenix WinNonlin Version 8.1, Certara, Princeton, NJ). Details are found in Data S1.
2.4. Determination of DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP within peripheral blood leukocytes
Buffy coat samples for DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP in peripheral blood leukocytes were collected at 24, 48, 72, 80 hours, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 13 days. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) hydrolysis was done essentially as described previously. 49 Details are found in Data S1. Quantitative LC‐MS/MS analysis was performed on the instrument as described above for CO with the same mass spectrometer settings. Chromatography employed an EZ:faast 25 cm × 2.0 mm, 4 μm column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA), and a linear gradient of acetonitrile in water with 0.2% formic acid, at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The response for the product ions for Ara‐C (m/z 112.1), dG (m/z 151.9), and the internal standard (m/z 115.1) were plotted and peaks at the proper retention time integrated with Quanbrowser software (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). The DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP was reported as pg/mL Ara‐C per μg/mL dG.
2.5. Peripheral blood leukocyte evaluation
Blood was collected into EDTA tubes at time 0, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, and 20 days after the first CO dose. Complete blood counts were performed at the diagnostic hematology laboratory at the UC Davis, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, with an automated hematology analyzer (ADVIA 120, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). All differential leukocyte counts were confirmed by microscopic observation of a modified Wright stained (Model 7151 Wescor Aerospray Hematology Pro, ELITech Bio‐Medical Systems, Logan, UT) blood smear. For the lymphocyte phenotype and ex vivo proliferation experiments, blood was collected (BD Vacutainer CPT cell preparation tube with sodium heparinN; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at 0, 3, 6, 10, and 20 days after the first CO dose and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) processed as previously described. 50 The PBMCs were either incubated with 8 panels of primary conjugated antibodies (Table 1) to define leukocyte subsets (CD45RA‐CD4‐CD8, CD3‐CD4‐CD8, CD3‐CD21, CD25‐CD21, CD4‐CD8‐CD25, Ki67‐CD3‐CD4, Ki67‐CD21, and CD3‐CD4‐FoxP3), or stimulated for proliferation analysis. A minimum of 25 000 live cells were collected for each experiment and all panels included a viability dye for exclusion of dead cells (Fixable Viability Dye eFlour780; eBioscience, San Diego, CA). For stimulation experiments, PBMCs were collected and resuspended in activation medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium + 10% heat‐inactivated fetal bovine serum + 1% Penicillin‐Streptomycin), and stored on ice until plating. The PBMCs were activated with 5 μg/mL concanavalin A (Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and spiked with 10 μM bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) 3 days poststimulation. Cells were collected 4 days poststimulation, processed according to the manufacturer's instructions (BrdU Flow Kit; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), stained with a viability dye and a primary conjugated anti‐BrdU antibody, and analyzed on a flow cytometer (Cytomics FC500, Beckman Coulter Inc, Brea, CA). Flow cytometry data were analyzed by FlowJo flow cytometry software (Tree Star Inc, Ashland, OR).
TABLE 1.
Antibodies utilized for lymphocyte phenotyping.
| Target epitope | Cell type | Fluorophore | Clone | Vendor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | T cell | Alexa Fluor 488 | CA17.2A12 | Leukocyte Antigen Biology Lab, UCD |
| CD4 | T helper | Phycoerythrin (PE) | CA13.1E4 | Leukocyte Antigen Biology Lab, UCD |
| CD8 | T cytotoxic | Pacific Blue | MCA1039PB | AbD Serotec |
| CD21 | B cell | PE | CA2.ID6 | Leukocyte Antigen Biology Lab, UCD |
| CD25 | Activated B and T cell | Alexa Fluor 488 | P4A10 | eBiosciences |
| CD45RA | T cell (naive) | Fluorescein (FITC) | CA4.1D3 | Leukocyte Antigen Biology Lab, UCD |
| FoxP3 | T‐cell regulatory | Alexa Fluor 647 | FJK‐16s | eBiosciences |
| Ki67 | Cell proliferation | eFlour 660 | 20Raj1 | eBiosciences |
| BrdU | Cell proliferation | Alexa Fluor 647 | MoBU‐1 | Invitrogen |
2.5.1. Statistical analysis
For peripheral blood leukocyte evaluations, data were analyzed statistically with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Dotmatics, San Diego, CA) Repeated measures data were analyzed by the Friedman test with Dunn's post hoc multiple comparison test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Drug administration and adverse reactions
All dogs received a total of 7 doses of CO at 200 mg/m2 PO. The CBC data were not available for Dog 1 on day 6 because of technical issues. All dogs developed VCOG grade 1 neutropenia (1500‐3000 cells/μL; Figure 4). Neutropenia resolved in all dogs by day 13. No dogs developed lymphopenia based on UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital reference intervals (<1000 cells/μL). One dog developed VCOG grade 1 decrease in hematocrit (hematocrit = 30‐40%) after drug administration on day 6 (Figure 4). Hematocrit was within reference intervals by day 7 in all dogs. One dog developed VCOG grade 2 thrombocytopenia (99 000 cells/μL; VCOG Grade 2 = 50 000‐100 000 cells/μl) and all dogs had VCOG grade 1 thrombocytopenia (100 000‐150 000 cells/μL; Figure 4). Thrombocytopenia resolved between day 13 and day 20. No other adverse events were noted.
FIGURE 4.

Peripheral blood neutrophil (A), lymphocyte (B) cell counts, hematocrit (C), and platelet counts (D) following the administration of oral CO at 200 mg/m2 q24h × 7 days. The asterisks (*) indicate when each dose was administered. The horizontal broken lines represent the lower limit of the laboratory reference interval. Reference ranges: neutrophils (3000‐10 500 cells/μL); lymphocytes (1000‐4000 cells/μL); hematocrit (40%‐55%); platelets (150 000‐400 000/μL).
3.2. Assay validation
The response for Ara‐C and CO was linear and gave correlation coefficients ≥0.99. The intra‐day and inter‐day precision and accuracy of the assay were determined by assaying quality control samples in replicates (n = 6). Accuracy was reported as percent nominal concentration and precision was reported as percent relative SD. For Ara‐C, accuracy was 99%, 100%, 101%, and 90% for 0.6, 15, 80, and 750 ng/mL, respectively. Precision for Ara‐C was 12%, 5%, 2%, and 5% for 0.6, 15, 80, and 750 ng/mL, respectively. For CO, accuracy was 97%, 94%, 92%, and 101% for 0.6, 15, 80, and 750 ng/mL, respectively. Precision was 16%, 4%, 2%, and 5% for 0.6, 15, 80, and 750 ng/mL, respectively. The technique was optimized to provide a limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1 and 0.08 ng/mL for Ara‐C and 0.2 and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively, for CO. The LOQ was 5 times signal‐to‐noise with no more than ±20% deviation from the nominal concentration at the LOQ, and the LOD was 3 times signal‐to‐noise.
3.3. Pharmacokinetic analysis
Cytosine arabinoside and CO were detectable in serum of all dogs after PO administration of the pre‐prodrug CO (Figure 2, Table 2). Preliminary data from 1 beagle dog was used to define appropriate sampling time points for the main study and provided similar results to the 3 study dogs (Data S2).
FIGURE 2.

Serum concentrations of CO (A) and Ara‐C (B) following the administration of oral CO at 200 mg/m2 q24h × 7 days. The asterisks (*) indicate when each dose was administered.
TABLE 2.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of CO and Ara C after PO administration of 200 mg/m2 CO.
| Dog | CO | Ara‐C | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C max (ng/mL) | T max (h) | T 1/2 (h) | AUC (h ng/mL) | AI | C max (ng/mL) | T max (h) | T 1/2 (h) | AUC (h ng/mL) | AI | |
| 1 | 229.3 (0.37 μM) | 12 | 6.7 | 3609 (5.86 μM) | 1.09 | 456.1 (1.88 μM) | 12 | 23.3 | 3252 (13.4 μM) | 1.96 |
| 2 | 324.6 (0.53 μM) | 4 | 15.1 | 2076 (3.37 μM) | 1.5 | 724.0 (2.98 μM) | 4 | 29.4 | 2194 (9.0 μM) | 2.32 |
| 3 | 473.2 (0.77 μM) | 2 | 20.5 | 5843 (9.50 μM) | 1.8 | 709.4 (2.92 μM) | 2 | 24 | 4282 (17.6 μM) | 1.98 |
| Mean | 342.4 (0.56 μM) | 6 | 14.1 | 3843 (6.24 μM) | 1.46 | 629.8 (2.59 μM) | 6 | 25.6 | 3243 (13.3 μM) | 2.10 |
Note: 1 μg/mL Ara‐C = 4.1 μM.
Abbreviations: AI, accumulation index; AUC, area under the curve; C max, maximum serum concentration after first CO dose; T max, time of maximum serum concentration after first CO dose; T 1/2, half‐life.
Pharmacokinetic data were similar for all 3 hound dogs (Figure 2). After the first dose, the mean C max for CO was 342.4 ng/mL (0.56 μM; range, 229.3‐473.2 ng/mL), and mean C max for Ara‐C was 629.8 ng/mL (2.59 μM; range, 456.1‐724.0 ng/mL). Mean elimination half‐life for CO was 14.1 hours (range, 6.7‐20.5 hours), and mean elimination half‐life for Ara‐C was 25.6 hours (range, 23.3‐29.4 hours). With a dosing interval of 24 hours, the mean accumulation indices for CO and Ara‐C were 1.4 and 2.1, respectively. Cerebrospinal fluid was collected successfully from all 3 dogs at days 0 and 1, and from 2/3 dogs at day 6 (Table 3). Cytarabine ocfosfate was not detected in CSF of any dog at day 1 or day 6. Cytosine arabinoside was detected at 24 hours in all dogs and CSF Ara‐C concentrations ranged from 9 to 64.9 ng/mL (0.04‐0.27 μM) with CSF:serum ratios ranging from 0.54 to 1.2.
TABLE 3.
Comparison of Ara‐C concentration (ng/mL) in serum and CSF after PO administration of 200 mg/m2 CO.
| Time (days) | Dog 1 | Dog 2 | Dog 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (ng/mL) | CSF (ng/mL) | CSF:Serum | Serum (ng/mL) | CSF (ng/mL) | CSF:Serum | Serum (ng/mL) | CSF (ng/mL) | CSF:Serum | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1 | 53.7 (0.2 μM) | 64.9 (0.27 μM) | 1.2 | 19.7 (0.08 μM) | 15 (0.06 μM) | 0.76 | 21.2 (0.09 μM) | 16.5 (0.07 μM) | 0.77 |
| 6 | 16.4 (0.07 μM) | 9 (0.04 μM) | 0.55 | 25.4 (0.1 μM) | 13.7 (0.06 μM) | 0.54 | ND | ND | ND |
Abbreviations: CSF:Serum, CSF, serum Ara‐C concentration ratio; ND, not done.
3.4. Intranuclear Ara‐CTP within normal peripheral blood leukocytes
The DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP (reported as pg/mL Ara‐C per μg/mL dG) was first assayed within peripheral leukocytes 24 hours after the first administration of CO (Figure 3). Final CO administration was at 144 hours (+6 days) and incorporated Ara‐CMP increased progressively with maximum concentrations of 218.3 to 283.3 pg/mL Ara‐C per μg/mL of deoxyguanosine (dG) at 144 to 192 hours. The DNA incorporation of Ara‐CMP did not appear to be saturated after 7 doses based on continuing increases in Ara‐CMP concentrations up to or beyond the last dose at 144 hours (+6 days). Elimination half‐life for DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP was estimated to be 45.4 to 60.9 hours for the 3 dogs and mean DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CMP concentrations at +13 days remained >25% mean maximum concentrations.
FIGURE 3.

Concentration of Ara‐C derived from Ara‐CTP incorporated in peripheral leukocyte DNA after PO administration of CO at 200 mg/m2 q24h × 7 days. The asterisks (*) indicate when each dose was administered.
3.5. Peripheral blood lymphocyte evaluation
Peripheral blood lymphopenia (<1000 cells/μL) was not documented in any dog, but a decreasing trend was seen in 2 dogs at day 6 (Figure 4).
A small but significant (P = .01) decrease in CD21+ B‐cell proportion was present on day 20 compared with baseline (Figure 5), but no significant difference in absolute number of B cells was noted. Moreover, parallel changes in T‐cell numbers were not recorded. Within the T‐cell compartment, there was a moderate but significant (P = .04) increase in absolute CD8+ T‐cell count at day 20 compared with baseline, and a significant increase (P = .02) in CD45RA+ (naive) CD4 T‐cell proportion on day 20 compared with baseline. A significant decrease in both proliferating Ki67+ CD4+ T cells (P = .01) and proliferating Ki67+ CD4‐ T cells (P = .04) was noted on day 10, compared with baseline, and ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation rates after exogenous mitogenic stimulation were decreased in all 3 dogs on day 6 compared to day 0, with a significant difference between day 6 and day 20 (P = .04; Figure 5).
FIGURE 5.

Lymphocyte subsets and phenotype. CD3 and CD21 percentages (A), absolute CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (B), Ki67+ CD4+ (C) Ki67+ CD4− (D), and CD45RA+ CD4 T cells (E), in all 3 dogs across the days of the experiment. Ex vivo BrdU incorporation post‐Con‐A treatment on days, 0, 6, and 20 (F). Asterisks denote significantly different mean values compared to day 0 for all data other than BrdU which is significant relative to day 20. *P < .05, **P < .01.
4. DISCUSSION
Optimal immunomodulatory dosing regimens for Ara‐C‐based treatments in dogs with inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease have not been defined. Optimization of veterinary regimens based on the pharmacokinetics of Ara‐C prodrug in plasma or serum has been suggested, often aimed at increasing exposure time to specific plasma concentrations of prodrug (Table S1). 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 However, serum Ara‐C concentration, although important, has been shown to be a suboptimal biomarker on its own for prediction of active drug metabolites and biological efficacy in human oncology patients. 24 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 58 Defining key parameters in the metabolism of Ara‐C to its active metabolite in dog tissues both in vitro and in vivo, ideally combined with biological markers for cellular efficacy, will be important in determining appropriate and relevant targets for therapeutic serum Ara‐C concentrations. Peak serum Ara‐C concentrations in our study were <750 ng/mL (3 μM) and minimum Ara‐C concentrations were <50 ng/mL (0.2 μM). At low plasma Ara‐C concentrations (<1 μM) accumulation of cellular Ara‐CTP active metabolite is limited by the number of membrane nucleotide transporters. 23 Clinically, in human leukemic patients, cellular elimination rate of Ara‐CTP remains relatively constant under different Ara‐C infusion conditions, and although plasma Ara‐C concentrations vary with different infusion doses, as long as steady‐state plasma concentration is >7 to 10 μM, Ara‐CTP accumulation is saturated and constant. 24 , 25 , 26 , 32 The rate‐limiting step associated with saturation, both in peripheral and CNS tissue, appears to be the initial phosphorylation of intracellular Ara‐C to Ara‐CMP 5 , 23 , 24 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 59 mediated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK; Figure 1) which is under complex control via a variety of nucleotides. 60 Deoxycytidine kinase is present at high concentrations in human peripheral lymphocytes and is critical for development of normal B and T lymphocytes. 61 , 62 As such, therapeutic targeting via the dCK salvage pathway utilizing nucleoside analogs such as Ara‐C or disrupting normal dCK activity is a potent mechanism to inhibit lymphocyte function. Increased dCK activity is reported in several experimental autoimmune models, and inhibiting dCK activity has been shown to ameliorate clinical signs in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. 63 Saturation‐related parameters for the salvage pathway for Ara‐C, including plasma concentrations and duration of drug exposure, in normal dog leukocytes have not been defined, although maximal Ara‐C concentrations in a majority of pharmacokinetic studies in dogs are in excess of human‐defined saturation concentrations (Table S1). 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 64
Clinical response to different Ara‐C regimens in dogs with inflammatory brain disease has been reported, and is the ultimate gold standard for efficacy, but reports have been variable with design limitations and contradictory results. Lack of histopathological diagnoses in a highly variable group of diseases, multiple immunomodulatory drugs, and different geographical and population features likely confound published data. In dogs, an initial Ara‐C constant rate infusion (100 mg/m2 over 24 hours) was reported as superior for short‐term survival compared to 50 mg/m2 SC q12h for 2 days. 65 A subsequent study suggested additional SC Ara‐C doses beyond the initial infusion had no clinical benefit. 66 Other studies, however, have not identified a clinical benefit from protocols involving initial Ara‐C infusions. 67 , 68
In our study, altered lymphocyte function was identified at Ara‐C concentrations below commonly suggested target concentrations (mean C max = 0.6 μg/mL [2.6 μM]). A nominal target plasma concentration of 1 μg/mL (4.1 μM) Ara‐C in dogs with inflammatory brain disease has been suggested based primarily on reported in vitro cytotoxic effects in leukemic cells. An Ara‐C concentration of 1.0 μg/mL (4.1 μM) caused 90% loss of leukemia cells in vitro, 20 , 69 , 70 and decreased viability at 0.625 μM with 50% decrease at 2.5 μM or 20 μM was reported in another study. 15 However, only 0.1 μg/mL (0.41 μM) Ara‐C decreased DNA synthesis in human leukemic cells by 50% to 97%, sufficient to inhibit cell division, 20 , 29 , 69 , 70 and increasing concentration > 0.25 μg/mL (1 μM) resulted in no additional suppression of DNA synthesis. 29 Dog leukemia cells have variable reported half‐maximal inhibitory concentrations with exposure to Ara‐C, ranging from 0.2 to 4.1 μM. 71 , 72
Normal lymphocytes and bone marrow cells generally exhibit less variability in pharmacokinetics and response to Ara‐C as compared to leukemia cells, and are generally more resistant to its cytolytic and proapoptotic effects. 33 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 Significant decrease in proliferation of activated normal T lymphocytes is seen at Ara‐C concentrations of 0.35 μM with approximately 50% decrease at 1 μM (approximately 0.25 μg/mL), and parallel but less marked effects are seen on cell viability and release of cytokines, chemokines, and interleukins at 0.35 μM. 75 Overall, biological effects on normal leukocytes (potentially more relevant to inflammatory versus neoplastic disease) are consistently reported at Ara‐C concentrations <1.0 μg/mL (4.1 μM) as reflected in the functional decrease in lymphocyte proliferation seen at Ara‐C concentrations in this range (C max, 1.88‐2.98 μM) in our study.
In human patients, metabolism of Ara‐C by cytidine deaminase occurs within minutes and a majority of drug is excreted in urine, primarily as Ara‐U, within 5 to 24 hours. 20 Cytosine arabinoside (unlike CO) is not administered PO because of high first‐pass elimination in the liver and metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract where high cytosine deaminase activity results in drug inactivation. Cytidine deaminase concentrations are significantly lower in dog tissues compared to human tissues 21 , 64 , 77 , 78 ; but metabolism of another cytidine deaminase‐targeted nucleoside analog (gemcitabine) was similar in dogs and humans. 79 Similarly, in our study and other Ara‐C studies, half lives in humans are similar to those in dogs with a generally biphasic elimination and variably defined half lives in the range of approximately 60 to 250 minutes in both species (Tables S1 and S2). 20 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 64 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 Other compounding factors such as interspecies differences in kinetic properties of rate‐limiting dCK activity also may determine overall similar Ara‐C pharmacokinetics. 87 In humans, these relatively short elimination half‐lives have driven the development of modified Ara‐C formulations such as PO CO and palmitic acid‐conjugated Ara‐C with altered pharmacokinetic profiles. 43 , 88
Cytarabine ocfosfate is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and distributed to depot sites including the CNS 89 and Ara‐C is released after peroxisomal β‐oxidation, primarily occurring in the liver. 44 , 89 , 90 Studies of CO in rodent models and human clinical patients have consistently reported prolonged plasma half‐lives of Ara‐C in the 24‐hour range (Table S3) 44 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 comparable to the results of our study. Because of its ease of administration and prolonged Ara‐C half‐life, CO has been targeted in humans for low‐dose regimens and in patients not eligible for intensive Ara‐C protocols, 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 an obvious parallel with low‐dose therapeutic approaches in dogs with inflammatory brain disease. Cytarabine ocfosfate has been reported in the treatment of 9 cats 99 and 1 dog 45 with myelodysplastic syndromes, but no pharmacokinetic data were described.
Compared to the 1 to 2 hour Ara‐C half‐lives reported previously in dogs and humans using Ara‐C protocols (Tables S1 and S2), 20 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 64 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 CO could offer potential advantages for immunomodulatory treatment if drug exposure time is an important factor and Ara‐C concentrations are appropriate to drive Ara‐CTP incorporation and downstream biological effects. Clinical benefits have been reported in several clinical and experimental leukemia CO studies in humans with resultant serum Ara‐C concentrations in the 0.04 to 2.98 μM range. 44 , 94 , 100 , 101 , 102 These findings and our study's CO/Ara‐C half‐life and maximum concentration data suggest that optimization of clinically relevant CO dosing regimens to achieve clinically relevant immunomodulation in dogs should be feasible.
Concentrations of Ara‐C in CSF in our study ranged from 0.04 to 0.27 μM with CSF:serum ratios between 0.54 and 1.22 that are consistent with the variable range (approximately 0.1‐0.6) reported previously in different species. 20 , 51 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 103 , 104 Cytarabine ocfosfate was not detected in CSF, consistent with previous data and potentially because of its high plasma protein binding. 93 Assessment of DNA incorporation of Ara‐CTP and functional activity of CSF resident leukocytes was not done in our study, but Ara‐C concentrations in matched serum and CSF samples were in similar, and overlapping ranges for the 3 dogs in which functional effects were documented (Table 3) and accumulation of Ara‐C and metabolites in brain interstitial fluid (ISF) and neuropil at similar concentrations is likely based on published data. 59 , 105 , 106 Accumulation of Ara‐C and Ara‐CTP within the CNS is of unknown importance in the context of immunomodulation of inflammatory CNS disease in dogs. Whether target cells for immunomodulation migrate into the CNS, reside within the CNS or both is not defined. In addition to mononuclear leukocytes, resident microglia are also likely to play an important role in the pathophysiology of inflammation and Ara‐C selectively decreases microglial activation and proinflammatory cytokines in rodent CNS models. 107 , 108 Drug entry into CSF and brain ISF, and partitioning among plasma, CSF, and brain ISF depends on many factors including protein binding, lipophilicity, molecular weight and efflux mechanisms. Although specific data relating to Ara‐C are not available, Ara‐C has low plasma protein binding, and CSF is likely to be a potentially good indicator (if not a reliable measure) of brain ISF concentrations of drugs based on data from several studies. 109 , 110 , 111 Cytosine arabinoside induces expression of efflux pump protein ABCB1 (PGp/MDR1), 112 but multidrug resistance protein activity appears to have minimal effect on Ara‐C activity. 113 , 114 Relating serum Ara‐C concentrations to ISF concentrations is challenging. Cytosine arabinoside is taken up relatively slowly into the CNS, but it appears to be concentrated over time, potentially because of cellular uptake and deaminase activity that is lower in brain (and CSF) than in extra‐CNS tissues 20 , 115 , 116 Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations therefore may underestimate ISF concentrations because of this cellular uptake and also because of more rapid turnover of CSF compared to ISF. 117 Relating CSF to serum concentrations is also challenging because CSF:serum ratios >1 are possible because of less rapid clearance from CSF compared to plasma depending on sampling times, 83 , 85 , 86 consistent with the CSF:serum ratio > 1 at 1 sample time‐point in our study. Cytosine arabinoside is delivered relatively homogenously to brain after IV administration, 105 and disruption of the blood‐brain barrier has been shown to increase Ara‐C concentrations in brain parenchyma experimentally, 118 which potentially is relevant to clinical inflammatory brain disease. However, although Ara‐C CSF concentrations may be an indicator of ISF concentrations derived from CNS vasculature, diffusion of Ara‐C specifically from CSF to the neuropil is limited to a few mm. 105 , 106
Toxicity from Ara‐C treatment regimens (50‐600 mg/m2) for immune‐mediated inflammatory brain disease in dogs appears to be low, and overt myelosuppression and associated hematological abnormalities, as with our study, are rarely reported. 51 , 53 , 56 , 57 , 65 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 However, from a pharmacotoxicology perspective, dosing regimens resulting in plasma concentrations above those that cause saturation of intracellular triphosphate formation are questionable although both peak and temporal exposure to Ara‐C must be considered. Lymphopenia was not identified in any of the dogs in our study but mild anemia (1/3), neutropenia (3/3), and thrombocytopenia (3/3) were seen by 144 hours (6 days) likely resulting from the shorter circulating half‐lives and more prolific progenitor pools compared to lymphocytes (Figure 4). 124 , 125 Lymphocyte sub‐type data should be interpreted cautiously because of small sample number and variability among dogs. Altered CD4:CD8 T cell ratios have been reported in ex vivo Ara‐C studies, albeit at higher (44 μM) Ara‐C concentrations. 75 The clinical relevance of the increased proportion of naive CD4 and absolute numbers of CD8 T cells, and decreased proportion of naive CD21 B cells is unclear and should be confirmed in larger studies.
The efficacy of Ara‐C as an immunomodulatory agent is not easily attributable to total lymphocyte numbers or major alterations in lymphocyte subpopulations based on our study or previous studies in dogs, and the effect of Ara‐C at these lower doses may primarily reflect alterations in lymphocyte function. Decreased percentages of Ki67 CD4+ and Ki67CD4‐lymphocytes were seen at certain time points (10 days), but the most consistent finding was a decreased ability to respond to mitogenic stimulation ex vivo (Figure 5). This functional effect on lymphocytes occurred at serum concentrations much lower than the proposed 1 μg/mL (4.1 μM) target concentration reported previously in dogs, 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 but consistent with Ara‐C concentrations associated with altered biological function in normal leukocytes.. 29 , 69 , 70 , 75 As expected, the functional effects on stimulated lymphocytes were associated with increased DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CTP. Cellular or incorporated Ara‐CTP concentrations, and more importantly Ara‐CTP retention, have predictive value for Ara‐C clinical efficacy in oncologic patients. 34 , 37 , 38 , 126 Specific cellular concentrations of Ara‐CTP in humans resulting in clinical efficacy and biological effects in leukemic cells have been reported. 3 , 34 , 36 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 127 , 128 but direct comparison with current data is not possible because of methodological differences. Our study used a more recently validated methodology 49 to determine DNA incorporation of Ara‐CTP relative to the native DNA nucleoside deoxyguanosine (dG) which was suggested to have better reliability compared to using number of cells or total protein as normalizing variables. Importantly, although Ara‐C concentrations were <1% C max by 6 days, DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CTP remained at >25% C max at 2 weeks. Prolonged retention of the active Ara‐CTP metabolite (rather than Ara‐C) during this time frame is consistent with anecdotal 3‐ to 4‐week Ara‐C treatment regimens proposed for inflammatory brain disease based on amelioration of clinical signs. Also, impaired lymphocyte function after chemotherapy (including Ara‐C) has been demonstrated for >= 4 months in leukemic children, albeit after more intensive therapeutic regimens. 129 Notably, Ara‐CTP accumulation was not saturated after 7 consecutive (200 mg/m2) doses, but accumulation indices suggested that dosing intervals could be extended.
Our study is limited by the small number of dogs and single dosing regimen, but similarity to previous findings relating to CO in other species is supportive of clinical relevance. Relevance of assessment of peripheral leukocyte populations in the context of CNS disease is a major consideration, as is the relevance of specific in vitro functional assays to in vivo peripheral lymphocyte function. The data do however provide a rationale for more objective, and potentially more relevant, methods of comparison of Ara‐C‐based dosing regimens as well as expanded in vitro definition of basic Ara‐C metabolite kinetics and functional sequelae in canine tissues.
Cytosine arabinoside pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are complex and incompletely understood. At the individual level, human patients and in vitro cells from human patients receiving the same Ara‐C and CO dose may have markedly different toxicities and pharmacokinetics for Ara‐C and Ara‐CTP. 1 , 22 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 32 , 33 , 42 , 94 Several potential factors including pharmacogenomic and population variables such as sex 22 and metabolic pathway gene polymorphisms and activity 1 , 22 , 130 , 131 are likely relevant and rarely considered in the context of inbred, geographically variable veterinary populations. It seems logical from current published data that optimal dosing of Ara‐C and Ara‐C analogs based on plasma Ara‐C concentrations in isolation has limitations. Our data, based on a single dosing regimen, suggest that functional perturbation of leukocyte activity in dogs occurs at Ara‐C concentrations below currently proposed target concentrations, and that functional changes are associated with accumulation of DNA‐incorporated Ara‐CTP. The 7‐day PO CO regimen was well tolerated other than moderate subclinical neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and a prolonged elimination half‐life of Ara‐C was obtained. Expanded in vitro and in vivo studies likely will be required to establish optimal dosing recommendations for this and other Ara‐C‐based drugs based on more detailed pharmacokinetic analysis of Ara‐C and downstream metabolites, preferably in combination with disease‐relevant functional biomarkers.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
OFF‐LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION
Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.
INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION
Approved by the University of California, Davis, IACUC (protocol #18431).
HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION
Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.
Supporting information
Data S1: Supporting Information.
Data S2: Supporting Information.
Table S1. Ara‐C Pharmacokinetic data in dogs.
Table S2. Ara‐C Pharmacokinetic data in humans.
Table S3. Ara‐C Pharmacokinetic data following cytarabine ocfosfate administration.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Funding was provided by the University of California, Davis Center for Companion Animal Health and the Holliday Neurology Resident Research Grant.
Zwueste DM, Vernau KM, Vernau W, et al. Oral cytarabine ocfosfate pharmacokinetics and assessment of leukocyte biomarkers in normal dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2023;37(6):2429‐2442. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16842
REFERENCES
- 1. di Francia R, Crisci S, de Monaco A, et al. Response and toxicity to cytarabine therapy in leukemia and lymphoma: from dose puzzle to pharmacogenomic biomarkers. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Derissen EJB, Beijnen JH. Intracellular pharmacokinetics of pyrimidine analogues used in oncology and the correlation with drug action. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59:1521‐1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kufe D, Spriggs D, Egan EM, Munroe D. Relationships among Ara‐CTP pools, formation of (Ara‐C)DNA, and cytotoxicity of human leukemic cells. Blood. 1984;64:54‐58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Major PP, Egan EM, Beardsley GP, Minden MD, Kufe DW. Lethality of human myeloblasts correlates with the incorporation of arabinofuranosylcytosine into DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:3235‐3239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Plagemann PG, Marz R, Wohlhueter RM. Transport and metabolism of deoxycytidine and 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine into cultured Novikoff rat hepatoma cells, relationship to phosphorylation, and regulation of triphosphate synthesis. Cancer Res. 1978;38:978‐989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Clarke ML, Mackey JR, Baldwin SA, et al. The role of membrane transporters in cellular resistance to anticancer nucleoside drugs. Cancer Treat Res. 2002;112:27‐47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kufe DW, Spriggs DR. Biochemical and cellular pharmacology of cytosine arabinoside. Semin Oncol. 1985;12:34‐48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kessel D, Hall TC, Wodinsky I. Transport and phosphorylation as factors in the antitumor action of cytosine arabinoside. Science. 1967;156:1240‐1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kufe DW, Major PP, Egan EM, Beardsley GP. Correlation of cytotoxicity with incorporation of Ara‐C into DNA. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:8997‐9000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Walter M, Herr P. Re‐discovery of pyrimidine salvage as target in cancer therapy. Cell. 2022;11:739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bhuyan BK, Scheidt LG, Fraser TJ. Cell cycle phase specificity of antitumor agents. Cancer Res. 1972;32:398‐407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Furlong NB, Gresham C. Inhibition of DNA synthesis but not of poly‐dAT synthesis by the arabinose analogue of cytidine in vitro. Nature. 1971;233:212‐214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Woodcock DM, Fox RM, Cooper IA. Evidence for a new mechanism of cytotoxicity of 1‐beta‐D arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res. 1979;39:1418‐1424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wist E, Krokan H, Prydz H. Effect of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine triphosphate on DNA synthesis in isolated HeLa cell nuclei. Biochemistry. 1976;15:3647‐3652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Li Z, Guo JR, Chen QQ, et al. Exploring the antitumor mechanism of high‐dose cytarabine through the metabolic perturbations of ribonucleotide and deoxyribonucleotide in human promyelocytic leukemia HL‐60 cells. Molecules. 2017;22:499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lauzon GJ, Paran JH, Paterson AR. Formation of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine diphosphate choline in cultured human leukemic RPMI 6410 cells. Cancer Res. 1978;38:1723‐1729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hawtrey AO, Scott‐Burden T, Robertson G. Inhibition of glycoprotein and glycolipid synthesis in hamster embryo cells by cytosine arabinoside and hydroxyurea. Nature. 1974;252:58‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hindenburg AA, Taub RN, Grant S, Chang G, Baker MA. Effects of pyrimidine antagonists on sialic acid regeneration in HL‐60 cells. Cancer Res. 1985;45:3048‐3052. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Creasey WA, Papac RJ, Markiw ME, Calabresi P, Welch AD. Biochemical and pharmacological studies with 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine in man. Biochem Pharmacol. 1966;15:1417‐1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ho DH, Frei E 3rd. Clinical pharmacology of 1‐beta‐d‐arabinofuranosyl cytosine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971;12:944‐954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Camiener GW, Smith CG. Studies of the enzymatic deamination of cytosine arabinoside. I. Enzyme distribution and species specificity. Biochem Pharmacol. 1965;14:1405‐1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Burk M, Heyll A, Arning M, Volmer M, Fartash K, Schneider W. Pharmacokinetics of high‐dose cytarabine and its deamination product—a reappraisal. Leuk Lymphoma. 1997;27:321‐327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. White JC, Rathmell JP, Capizzi RL. Membrane transport influences the rate of accumulation of cytosine arabinoside in human leukemia cells. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:380‐387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jamieson GP, Snook MB, Wiley JS. Saturation of intracellular cytosine arabinoside triphosphate accumulation in human leukemic blast cells. Leuk Res. 1990;14:475‐479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Muus P, Drenthe‐Schonk A, Haanen C, Wessels H, Linssen P. In‐vitro studies on phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of cytosine arabinoside in human leukemic cells. Leuk Res. 1987;11:319‐325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Plunkett W, Liliemark JO, Adams TM, et al. Saturation of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine 5′‐triphosphate accumulation in leukemia cells during high‐dose 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine therapy. Cancer Res. 1987;47:3005‐3011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Liliemark JO, Plunkett W. Regulation of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine 5′‐triphosphate accumulation in human leukemia cells by deoxycytidine 5′‐triphosphate. Cancer Res. 1986;46:1079‐1083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chou TC, Arlin Z, Clarkson BD, Phillips FS. Metabolism of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine in human leukemic cells. Cancer Res. 1977;37:3561‐3570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Harris AL, Grahame‐Smith DG. Variation in sensitivity of DNA synthesis to Ara‐C in acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1980;45:371‐379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kohl U, Schwabe D, Montag E, et al. Formation of cytosine arabinoside‐5′‐triphosphate in different cultured lymphoblastic leukaemic cells with reference to their drug sensitivity. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:209‐214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Shrecker AW, Urshel MJ. Metabolism of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine in leukemia L1210: studies with intact cells. Cancer Res. 1968;28:793‐801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Plunkett W, Liliemark JO, Estey E, Keating MJ. Saturation of ara‐CTP accumulation during high‐dose ara‐C therapy: pharmacologic rationale for intermediate‐dose ara‐C. Semin Oncol. 1987;14:159‐166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hiddemann W, Schleyer E, Unterhalt M, et al. Differences in the intracellular pharmacokinetics of cytosine arabinoside (AraC) between circulating leukemic blasts and normal mononuclear blood cells. Leukemia. 1992;6:1273‐1280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rustum YM, Riva C, Preisler HD. Pharmacokinetic parameters of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine (Ara‐C) and their relationship to intracellular metabolism of ara‐C, toxicity, and response of patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia treated with conventional and high‐dose Ara‐C. Semin Oncol. 1987;14:141‐148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Estey E, Plunkett W, Dixon D, Keating M, McCredie K, Freireich EJ. Variables predicting response to high dose cytosine arabinoside therapy in patients with refractory acute leukemia. Leukemia. 1987;1:580‐583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kantarjian HM, Estey EH, Plunkett W, et al. Phase I‐II clinical and pharmacologic studies of high‐dose cytosine arabinoside in refractory leukemia. Am J Med. 1986;81:387‐394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Preisler HD, Rustum Y, Priore RL. Relationship between leukemic cell retention of cytosine arabinoside triphosphate and the duration of remission in patients with acute non‐lymphocytic leukemia. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1985;21:23‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Preisler HD, Rustum YM, Azarnia N, Priore R. Abrogation of the prognostic significance of low leukemic cell retention of cytosine arabinoside triphosphate by intensification of therapy and by alteration in the dose and schedule of administration of cytosine arabinoside. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1987;19:69‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Plunkett W, Iacoboni S, Estey E, Danhauser L, Liliemark JO, Keating MJ. Pharmacologically directed Ara‐C therapy for refractory leukemia. Semin Oncol. 1985;12:20‐30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Plunkett W, Iacoboni S, Keating MJ. Cellular pharmacology and optimal therapeutic concentrations of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine 5′‐triphosphate in leukemic blasts during treatment of refractory leukemia with high‐dose 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine. Scand J Haematol Suppl. 1986;44:51‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Estey EH, Keating MJ, McCredie KB, Freireich EJ, Plunkett W. Cellular ara‐CTP pharmacokinetics, response, and karyotype in newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia. 1990;4:95‐99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Boos J, Hohenlochter B, Schulze‐Westhoff P, et al. Intracellular retention of cytosine arabinoside triphosphate in blast cells from children with acute myelogenous and lymphoblastic leukemia. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1996;26:397‐404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Saneyoshi M, Morozumi M, Kodama K, et al. Synthetic nucleosides and nucleotides. XVI. Synthesis and biological evaluations of a series of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine 5′‐alkyl or arylphosphates. Chem Pharm Bull(Tokyo). 1980;28:2915‐2923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kodama K, Morozumi M, Saitoh K, Kuninaka A, Yoshino H, Saneyoshi M. Antitumor activity and pharmacology of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine‐5′‐stearylphosphate: an orally active derivative of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1989;80:679‐685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ide K, Momoi Y, Minegishi M, et al. A severe hepatic disorder with myelodysplastic syndrome, treated with cytarabine ocfosfate, in a dog. Aust Vet J. 2003;81:47‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. LeBlanc AK, Atherton M, Bentley RT, et al. Veterinary cooperative oncology group—common terminology criteria for adverse events (VCOG‐CTCAE v2) following investigational therapy in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Oncol. 2021;19:311‐352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hilhorst MJ, Hendriks G, van Hout MW, et al. HPLC‐MS/MS method for the determination of cytarabine in human plasma. Bioanalysis. 2011;3:1603‐1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Knych HK, Seminoff K, McKemie DS. Detection and pharmacokinetics of grapiprant following oral administration to exercised Thoroughbred horses. Drug Test Anal. 2018;10:1237‐1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wickremsinhe ER, Lutzke BS, Jones BR, et al. Quantification of gemcitabine incorporation into human DNA by LC/MS/MS as a surrogate measure for target engagement. Anal Chem. 2010;82:6576‐6583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kol A, Foutouhi S, Walker NJ, Kong NT, Weimer BC, Borjesson DL. Gastrointestinal microbes interact with canine adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and enhance immunomodulatory functions. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1831‐1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Scott‐Moncrieff JC, Chan TC, Samuels ML, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of cytosine arabinoside in dogs. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1991;29:13‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Early PJ, Crook KI, Williams LM, et al. Plasma and serum concentrations of cytarabine administered via continuous intravenous infusion to dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2017;40:411‐414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Crook KI, Early PJ, Messenger KM, Muñana KR, Gallagher R, Papich MG. The pharmacokinetics of cytarabine in dogs when administered via subcutaneous and continuous intravenous infusion routes. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2013;36:408‐411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Pastina B, Early PJ, Bergman RL, et al. The pharmacokinetics of cytarabine administered subcutaneously, combined with prednisone, in dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2018;41:638‐643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Levitin HA, Foss KD, Li Z, Reinhart JM, Hague DW, Fan TM. Pharmacokinetics of a cytosine arabinoside subcutaneous protocol in dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown aetiology. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2021;44:696‐704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jones A, McGrath S, Gustafson DL. The pharmacokinetics of cytarabine administered at three distinct subcutaneous dosing protocols in dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2019;42:588‐592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Mancini SL, Early PJ, Slater BM, et al. Novel subcutaneous cytarabine infusion with the Omnipod system in dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology. Am J Vet Res. 2022;83:1‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Liliemark JO, Plunkett W, Dixon DO. Relationship of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine in plasma to 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine 5′‐triphosphate levels in leukemic cells during treatment with high‐dose 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res. 1985;45:5952‐5957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Spector R. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of cytosine arabinoside in the central nervous system. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982;222:1‐6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Ives DH, Durham JP. Deoxycytidine kinase. 3. Kinetics and allosteric regulation of the calf thymus enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:2285‐2294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Spasokoukotskaja T, Arner ES, Brosjo O, et al. Expression of deoxycytidine kinase and phosphorylation of 2‐chlorodeoxyadenosine in human normal and tumour cells and tissues. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:202‐208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Toy G, Austin WR, Liao HI, et al. Requirement for deoxycytidine kinase in T and B lymphocyte development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5551‐5556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Chen BY, Salas JR, Trias AO, et al. Targeting deoxycytidine kinase improves symptoms in mouse models of multiple sclerosis. Immunology. 2023;168:152‐169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Ho DH, Carter CJ, Loo TL, Abbott RL, McBride C. Pharmacologic studies of cyclocytidine and arabinosylcytosine in dogs. Drug Metab Dispos. 1975;3:309‐313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lowrie M, Thomson S, Smith P, Garosi L. Effect of a constant rate infusion of cytosine arabinoside on mortality in dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin. Vet J. 2016;213:1‐5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Stee K, Broeckx BJG, Targett M, Gomes SA, Lowrie M. Cytosine arabinoside constant rate infusion without subsequent subcutaneous injections for the treatment of dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin. Vet Rec. 2020;187:e98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Barber R, Downey KL. Treatment with cytarabine at initiation of therapy with cyclosporine and glucocorticoids for dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin is not associated with improved outcomes. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:925774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lawn RW, Harcourt‐Brown TR. Risk factors for early death or euthanasia within 100 days of diagnosis in dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin. Vet J. 2022;287:105884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Wilkoff LJ, Wilcox WS, Burdeshaw JA, Dixon GJ, Dulmadge EA. Effect of antimetabolites on kinetic behavior of proliferating cultured L1210 leukemia cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1967;39:965‐975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Graham FL, Whitmore GF. The effect of‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine on growth, viability, and DNA synthesis of mouse L‐cells. Cancer Res. 1970;30:2627‐2635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Pawlak A, Rapak A, Zbyryt I, Obmińska‐Mrukowicz B. The effect of common antineoplastic agents on induction of apoptosis in canine lymphoma and leukemia cell lines. In Vivo. 2014;28:843‐850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Pawlak A, Obminska‐Mrukowicz B, Zbyryt I, et al. In vitro drug sensitivity in canine lymphoma. J Vet Res. 2016;60:55‐61. [Google Scholar]
- 73. Schrek R, Stefani SS. Cytarabine—cytocidal effect on normal and leukemic lymphocytes—synergism with X‐rays and comparison with mechlorethamine. Exp Mol Pathol. 1976;24:84‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Grant S, Bhalla K, Arlin Z, Howe CW. The effect of a prolonged in vitro exposure to 1‐beta‐D arabinofuranosylcytosine and deoxycytidine on the survival of normal (CFU‐GM) and leukemic (L‐CFU) human myeloid progenitor cells in suspension culture. Exp Hematol. 1990;18:41‐48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ersvaer E, Brenner AK, Vetas K, et al. Effects of cytarabine on activation of human T cells—cytarabine has concentration‐dependent effects that are modulated both by valproic acid and all‐trans retinoic acid. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;16:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Hiddemann W, Schleyer E, Unterhalt M, Kern W, Büchner T. Optimizing therapy for acute myeloid leukemia based on differences in intracellular metabolism of cytosine arabinoside between leukemic blasts and normal mononuclear blood cells. Ther Drug Monit. 1996;18:341‐349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Dedrick RL, Forrester DD, Cannon JN, el Dareer SM, Mellett LB. Pharmacokinetics of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine (ARA‐C) deamination in several species. Biochem Pharmacol. 1973;22:2405‐2417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Dareer SM, Mulligan LT Jr, White V, et al. Distribution of [3H]cytosine arabinoside and its products in mice, dogs, and monkeys and effect of tetrahydrouridine. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977;61:395‐407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. O'Brien DR, Guerrero TA, Allstadt Frazier S, et al. Gemcitabine degradation in whole blood from humans, dogs, cats, and horses. J Vet Sci Technol. 2012;3:1000119. [Google Scholar]
- 80. Hande KR, Stein RS, McDonough DA, et al. Effects of high‐dose cytarabine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982;31:669‐674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. van Prooijen R, van der Kleijn E, Haanen C. Pharmacokinetics of cytosine arabinoside in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1977;21:744‐750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Harris AL, Potter C, Bunch C, Boutagy J, Harvey DJ, Grahame‐Smith DG. Pharmacokinetics of cytosine arabinoside in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8:219‐227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Capizzi RL, Yang JL, Cheng E, et al. Alteration of the pharmacokinetics of high‐dose Ara‐C by its metabolite, high Ara‐U in patients with acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1:763‐771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Pommier Y, Pochat L, Marie JP, Zittoun RA. High‐dose cytarabine in acute leukemia: toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Cancer Treat Rep. 1983;67:371‐373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Slevin ML, Piall EM, Aherne GW, Harvey VJ, Johnston A, Lister TA. Effect of dose and schedule on pharmacokinetics of high‐dose cytosine arabinoside in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1:546‐551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Breithaupt H, Pralle H, Eckhardt T, von Hattingberg M, Schick J, Löffler H. Clinical results and pharmacokinetics of high‐dose cytosine arabinoside (HD ARA‐C). Cancer. 1982;50:1248‐1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Reichelova V, Juliusson G, Spasokoukotskaja T, et al. Interspecies differences in the kinetic properties of deoxycytidine kinase elucidate the poor utility of a phase I pharmacologically directed dose‐escalation concept for 2‐chloro‐2′‐deoxyadenosine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1995;36:524‐529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Zhang J, Zhang D, Hu X, Liu R, Li Z, Luan Y. Rational design of a new cytarabine‐based prodrug for highly efficient oral delivery of cytarabine. RSC Adv. 2018;8:13103‐13111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Takayama H, Nakagawa Y, Ochiai H, et al. Metabolic fate of YNK01 (1): absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion after single administration of [14C] YNK01 to Rats. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1993;8:1229‐1239. [Google Scholar]
- 90. Yoshida Y, Yamada J, Watanabe T, Suga T, Takayama H. Participation of the peroxisomal beta‐oxidation system in the chain‐shortening of PCA16, a metabolite of the cytosine arabinoside prodrug, YNKO1, in rat liver. Biochem Pharmacol. 1990;39:1505‐1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Sato T, Morozumi M, Kodama K, Kuninaka A, Yoshino H. Sensitive radioimmunoassay for cytarabine and uracil arabinoside in plasma. Cancer Treat Rep. 1984;68:1357‐1366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Schleyer E, Braess J, Ramsauer B, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Ara‐CMP‐stearate (YNK01): phase I study of the oral Ara‐C derivative. Leukemia. 1995;9:1085‐1090. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Ueda T, Kamiya K, Urasaki Y, et al. Clinical pharmacology of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine‐5′‐stearylphosphate, an orally administered long‐acting derivative of low‐dose 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine. Cancer Res. 1994;54:109‐113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Braess J, Freund M, Hanauske A, et al. Oral cytarabine ocfosfate in acute myeloid leukemia and non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma—phase I/II studies and pharmacokinetics. Leukemia. 1998;12:1618‐1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Horikoshi A, Iriyama N, Hirabayashi Y, et al. Efficacy of oral cytarabine ocfosfate and etoposide in the treatment of elderly patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes compared to that in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients. Chemotherapy. 2013;59:152‐158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Ohno R, Tatsumi N, Hirano M, et al. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with orally administered 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine‐5′‐stearylphosphate. Oncology. 1991;48:451‐455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Maloisel F, Guerci A, Guyotat D, et al. Results of a phase II trial of a combination of oral cytarabine ocfosfate (YNK01) and interferon alpha‐2b for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in chronic phase. Leukemia. 2002;16:573‐580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Mollee P, Arthur C, Hughes T, et al. Interferon‐alpha‐2b and oral cytarabine ocfosfate for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1810‐1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Hisasue M, Okayama H, Okayama T, et al. Hematologic abnormalities and outcome of 16 cats with myelodysplastic syndromes. J Vet Intern Med. 2001;15:471‐477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Ishikura H, Sawada H, Okazaki T, et al. The effect of low dose Ara‐C in acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemias and atypical leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1984;58:9‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Kreis W, Chaudhri F, Chan K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of low‐dose 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine given by continuous intravenous infusion over twenty‐one days. Cancer Res. 1985;45:6498‐6501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Spriggs D, Griffin J, Wisch J, Kufe D. Clinical pharmacology of low‐dose cytosine arabinoside. Blood. 1985;65:1087‐1089. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Lopez JA, Nassif E, Vannicola P, Krikorian JG, Agarwal RP. Central nervous system pharmacokinetics of high‐dose cytosine arabinoside. J Neurooncol. 1985;3:119‐124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Donehower RC, Karp JE, Burke PJ. Pharmacology and toxicity of high‐dose cytarabine by 72‐hour continuous infusion. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70:1059‐1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Groothuis DR, Benalcazar H, Allen CV, et al. Comparison of cytosine arabinoside delivery to rat brain by intravenous, intrathecal, intraventricular and intraparenchymal routes of administration. Brain Res. 2000;856:281‐290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Blasberg RG. Methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and BCNU concentration in brain after ventriculocisternal perfusion. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977;61:625‐631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Andre C, Guzman‐Quevedo O, Rey C, et al. Inhibiting microglia expansion prevents diet‐induced hypothalamic and peripheral inflammation. Diabetes. 2017;66:908‐919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Svensson M, Aldskogius H. Infusion of cytosine‐arabinoside into the cerebrospinal fluid of the rat brain inhibits the microglial cell proliferation after hypoglossal nerve injury. Glia. 1993;7:286‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. de Lange EC. Utility of CSF in translational neuroscience. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013;40:315‐326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Shen DD, Artru AA, Adkison KK. Principles and applicability of CSF sampling for the assessment of CNS drug delivery and pharmacodynamics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:1825‐1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Lin JH. CSF as a surrogate for assessing CNS exposure: an industrial perspective. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:46‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Prenkert M, Uggla B, Tina E, Tidefelt U, Strid H. Rapid induction of P‐glycoprotein mRNA and protein expression by cytarabine in HL‐60 cells. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4071‐4076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Stam RW, van den Heuvel‐Eibrink MM, den Boer ML, et al. Multidrug resistance genes in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Ara‐C is not a substrate for the breast cancer resistance protein. Leukemia. 2004;18:78‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Takara K, Sakaeda T, Yagami T, et al. Cytotoxic effects of 27 anticancer drugs in HeLa and MDR1‐overexpressing derivative cell lines. Biol Pharm Bull. 2002;25:771‐778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Ho DH. Distribution of kinase and deaminase of 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine in tissues of man and mouse. Cancer Res. 1973;33:2816‐2820. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Johnson MD, Anderson BD. Localization of purine metabolizing enzymes in bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells: an enzymatic blood‐brain barrier for dideoxynucleosides? Pharm Res. 1996;13:1881‐1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Warren KE. Beyond the blood:brain barrier: the importance of central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics for the treatment of CNS tumors, including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Front Oncol. 2018;8:239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Zeng HQ, Lu L, Wang F, et al. Focused ultrasound‐induced blood‐brain barrier disruption enhances the delivery of cytarabine to the rat brain. J Chemother. 2012;24:358‐363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Menaut P, Landart J, Behr S, Lanore D, Trumel C. Treatment of 11 dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin with a combination of prednisolone and cytosine arabinoside. Vet Rec. 2008;162:241‐245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Zarfoss M, Schatzberg S, Venator K, et al. Combined cytosine arabinoside and prednisone therapy for meningoencephalitis of unknown aetiology in 10 dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2006;47:588‐595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Keegan S, Rose JH, Khan Z, Liebel FX. Low frequency of pre‐treatment and post‐treatment haematological abnormalities in dogs with non‐infectious meningoencephalitis treated with cytosine arabinoside and prednisolone. Vet Rec Open. 2019;6:e000315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Reese JR, Early PJ, Bergman RL, et al. Evaluation of hematologic parameters in 40 dogs receiving long‐term cytarabine for meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology. Open Access J Vet Sci Res. 2022;7:1‐8. [Google Scholar]
- 123. Smith PM, Stalin CE, Shaw D, Granger N, Jeffery ND. Comparison of two regimens for the treatment of meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown etiology. J Vet Intern Med. 2009;23:520‐526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Craig M. Towards quantitative systems pharmacology models of chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2017;6:293‐304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Zeuner A, Signore M, Martinetti D, Bartucci M, Peschle C, de Maria R. Chemotherapy‐induced thrombocytopenia derives from the selective death of megakaryocyte progenitors and can be rescued by stem cell factor. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4767‐4773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Riva CM, Rustum YM. 1‐beta‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine metabolism and incorporation into DNA as determinants of in vivo murine tumor cell response. Cancer Res. 1985;45:6244‐6249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Heinemann V, Estey E, Keating MJ, Plunkett W. Patient‐specific dose rate for continuous infusion high‐dose cytarabine in relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:622‐628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Kawasaki H, Higashigawa M, Ohkubo T, et al. Relationship between intracellular Dctp Ara‐Ctp ratio and cytotoxic effect of Ara‐C. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1989;253:369‐374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Humphrey GB, Nesbit ME Jr, Chary KK, et al. Impaired lymphocyte transformation in leukemic patients after intensive therapy. Cancer. 1972;29:402‐406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Herold N, Rudd SG, Ljungblad L, et al. Targeting SAMHD1 with the Vpx protein to improve cytarabine therapy for hematological malignancies. Nat Med. 2017;23:256‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Kreis W, Lesser M, Budman DR, et al. Phenotypic analysis of 1‐B‐D‐arabinofuranosylcytosine deamination in patients treated with high doses and correlation with response. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1992;30:126‐130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1: Supporting Information.
Data S2: Supporting Information.
Table S1. Ara‐C Pharmacokinetic data in dogs.
Table S2. Ara‐C Pharmacokinetic data in humans.
Table S3. Ara‐C Pharmacokinetic data following cytarabine ocfosfate administration.
