Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2023 Nov 17;102(46):e36171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036171

Preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis in a family with pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias: A case report

Jiayao Chen a,b, Zhiping Zhang c, Wenjing Shi a, Qin Yan a, Xingyu Bi c, Pengfei Zhu c, Dongdong Zhang c, Xueqing Wu c,*
PMCID: PMC10659598  PMID: 37986304

Abstract

Rationale:

Pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias (PPSH) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of sex development caused by biallelic mutations in SRD5A2. PPSH is characterized by a vaginal-like blind ending perineal opening, penoscrotal hypospadias, and impaired masculinization.

Patient concerns:

We reported preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis in a family with PPSH.

Diagnosis:

Whole-exome sequencing of the family identified 2 SRD5A2 pathogenic variants (c.578A>G and c.607G>A). Haplotype analysis showed that the variants were inherited from the previous generation of this family.

Interventions:

During subsequent in vitro fertilization, preimplantation genetic testing was performed on 9 embryos. One unaffected embryo was transferred, resulting in a singleton pregnancy.

Outcomes:

The prenatal diagnosis at 20 weeks’ gestation confirmed the fetus was unaffected. A healthy female infant weighing 3100 g and measuring 50 cm was delivered vaginally at 39+5 weeks of gestation.

Lessons subsections:

This case highlights the use of preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis to prevent the transmission of PPSH in families at risk. Our approach provides an effective strategy for identification and management of families with autosomal recessive disorders like PPSH.

Keywords: preimplantation genetic testing, prenatal diagnosis, pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias, SRD5A2 gene

1. Introduction

Pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias (PPSH) is an autosomal recessive disorder of sex development caused by mutations in SRD5A2. The mutations in the SRD5A2 gene results in a failure to convert testosterone to dihydrotestosterone, resulting in normal or high serum concentrations of testosterone for males, but a low level of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and an increased T/DHT ratio at baseline or after human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) stimulation,[1] thus producing a wide range of genital ambiguity at birth.[2] Patients with PPSH exhibit impaired masculinization and a spectrum of genital anomalies ranging from predominantly female to ambiguous.[3] Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) allows for identification of pathogenic variants in embryos so that unaffected embryos can be selected for transfer, preventing transmission of genetic diseases to offspring.[4,5] While surgical treatment of genital anomalies associated with SRD5A2 variants is well studied, less is known about the use of PGT-M to prevent SRD5A2-related disorders. We identified a family carrying SRD5A2 variants. With informed consent, we performed PGT-M in this family and successfully prevented transmission of PPSH to the next generation.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Clinical data

A married couple with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes presented to our reproductive medicine center in October 2021 requesting preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to prevent recurrence in future pregnancies. They had 2 sons with disorders of sex development, hypospadias, and neonatal death in 2017 and 2019, respectively. Comprehensive medical evaluations did not reveal the etiology. With informed consent from the couple and their families, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) (without proband), PGT-M and prenatal diagnosis.

2.2. Research methods

2.2.1. Pathogenic variant detection.

Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 mL peripheral blood samples (Blood Genome Column Medium Extraction Kit (Kangweishiji, China)) from the couple and their respective parents. Whole-exome sequencing was performed to detect pathogenic variants, followed by Sanger sequencing validation of detected variants in all samples.

2.2.2. Family haplotyping.

To determine the parental origin of the pathogenic variants, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping was performed using the Illumina Infinium Asian Screening Array-24 v1.0 Kit. Genomic DNA samples from the couple and their parents were analyzed to establish SNP-linked haplotypes. The haplotype co-segregating with the pathogenic variants was identified for subsequent embryo haplotyping during PGT.

2.2.3. Preimplantation genetic testing and IVF.

Following haplotyping, PGT-M and IVF were performed. A long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol was used for controlled ovarian stimulation. 28 oocytes were retrieved, of which 18 metaphase II (MII) oocytes underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Embryos were cultured to the blastocyst stage on day 5. Trophectoderm biopsies were performed on 9 morphologically suitable blastocysts for genetic testing. Biopsied blastocysts were vitrified after biopsy.

2.2.4. Single-cell whole genome amplification and sequencing.

Trophectoderm biopsy samples were subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA) using the ChromSwiftTM kit (Yikon Genomics, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. WGA products were fragmented and libraries were constructed for next-generation sequencing on the Illumina Nextseq 550 platform to analyze embryonic ploidy. The WGA products also underwent SNP haplotyping and Sanger sequencing of the pathogenic variants to determine the embryo genotype. Embryos without the familial pathogenic variants and normal chromosomal ploidy were selected for transfer based on the comprehensive analysis.

2.2.5. Embryo transfer and follow-up.

Twelve days after embryo transfer, the female’s serum HCG level was 455.96 mIU/mL. Four weeks after transfer, a transvaginal ultrasound showed an intrauterine singleton pregnancy, confirming a clinical pregnancy. At 20 weeks of gestation, amniocentesis and fetal ultrasound were performed to determine fetal ploidy and genotype.

3. Results

3.1. The couple carried pathogenic variants in SRD5A2

The couple underwent WES, followed by Sanger sequencing validation of detected variants in their respective parents. The husband and his father harbored the SRD5A2 c.578A>G pathogenic variant. The wife and her mother harbored the SRD5A2 c.607G>A pathogenic variant (Fig. 1). Thus, the couple both carried heterozygous pathogenic variants in SRD5A2, the gene associated with PPSH. This was consistent with the phenotypic manifestations observed in their deceased sons. The husband’s mother and wife’s father did not carry pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in this gene (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The couple and their families carried pathogenic variants in SRD5A2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Family lineage SRD5A2 gene family map and results of SNP typing linkage analysis in family pre-experiment. SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

3.2. PGT-M and pregnancy outcome

The couple was informed of the risk of re-occurrence in the offspring after genetic counseling. They requested PGT-M to assist in pregnancy. In the PGT-M family pre-experiment, SNP haplotyping was performed, and consistent with the gene testing results, the pathogenic haplotype was derived from both sexes (Fig. 2).

Haplotyping confirmed that the pathogenic variants originated from both the husband and wife (Fig. 2). Trophectoderm biopsies from 9 morphologically suitable blastocysts underwent successful WGA. Analysis of the 9 embryos revealed that 5 were euploid without the paternal or maternal pathogenic SRD5A2 variants (Table 1). Following genetic counseling, a frozen-thawed transfer of embryo 31636_2 was performed in February 2022.Twelve days after transfer, the serum HCG was 455.96 mIU/mL. Ultrasound 4 weeks after transfer showed an ongoing singleton intrauterine pregnancy. Amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation revealed a normal karyotype and negative results for copy number variations (Fig. 3A). No pathogenic SRD5A2 variants were detected (Fig. 3B and C). The remaining prenatal evaluations were normal. A healthy female infant weighing 3100 g and measuring 50 cm was delivered vaginally at 39+5 weeks of gestation. After delivering a healthy fetus, patients and their families are very happy and approval our treatment options.

Table 1.

Results of 9 blastocyst biopsy samples.

Sample name Morphology score CNV test results SNP chain analysis Judgment results Mutation site detection results
SRD5A2, c.578A>G SRD5A2, c.607G>A
31636_1 5BB 46, XN Carrying SRD5A2 gene c.607G>A heterozygous
Mutation (maternal origin)
No mutation Heterozygous mutation
31636_2 5AB 46, XN Not carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G and c.607G>A mutations No mutation No mutation
31636_3 5BB 46, XN Not carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G and c.607G>A mutations No mutation No mutation
31636_4 5AB 46, XN Carrying SRD5A2 gene c.607G>A heterozygous Mutation (maternal origin) No mutation Heterozygous mutation
31636_5 5AB 46, XN Not carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G and c.607G>A mutations No mutation No mutation
31636_6 5BB 46, XN Carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G heterozygous mutation (paternal origin) Heterozygous mutation No mutation
31636_7 5AB 46, XN Not carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G and c.607G>A mutations No mutation No mutation
31636_8 5AB 46, XN Not carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G and c.607G>A mutations No mutation No mutation
31636_9 5BC 46, XN Carrying the SRD5A2 gene c.578A>G heterozygous mutation (paternal origin) Heterozygous mutation No mutation

SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Amniocentesis results at 20 weeks of gestation: (A) fetal amniotic fluid exfoliation cell CNV results; ultrasound-guided amniocentesis at 20 weeks of gestation suggest: (B) no c.578A>G mutations; (C) no c.607G>A mutations. CNV = copy number variation.

4. Discussion

Pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias (PPSH) results from deficiency of steroid 5-α reductase type 2, an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of T to DHT using NADPH as a cofactor.[6] Variants in SRD5A2, the gene encoding this enzyme, lead to impaired conversion of T to DHT, resulting in normal or high T levels but low DHT levels and an increased T/DHT ratio at baseline or after HCG stimulation.[1] This produces a spectrum of genital ambiguity at birth, though testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels do not strongly correlate with phenotypic severity.[7]

The SRD5A2 gene on chromosome 2p23.1 contains 5 exons and 4 introns, encoding a 254-amino acid protein with an androgen-binding domain (N-terminal)) and NADPH cofactor -binding domain (C-terminal).[1] It is abundant in embryonic testis and prostate tissue. Most variants occur in exon 1 and exon 4, considered hotspots.[1] Reported variant types include missense, nonsense, splice site, frameshift, and large deletions, with over 200 variants in ClinVar and 186 in HGMD.[8,9] Here, the couple had the common p.G203S variant, causing a glycine to serine change at residue 203 in the transmembrane domain, and the rare p.D193S variant, changing aspartic acid to serine at residue 193. The p.G203S variant reduces enzyme activity by ~60% and correlates with moderate to severe phenotypes,[7,8] while the p.D193S variant has not been functionally characterized. In general, loss-of-function variants correlate with severe phenotypes, while some residual activity correlates with variable, milder phenotypes, but other factors also contribute.[8]

There are about 7000 monogenic disorders, most without effective treatment, creating substantial burdens.[10] Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) screens embryos before transfer, allowing selection of unaffected embryos.[4,5] PGT-M prevents pregnancy termination and associated trauma by identifying affected embryos preimplantation.[5,11] With improving technology, PGT-M prevents genetic disease transmission and birth of affected children.[6]

PGT-M requires genetic testing, often using whole genome amplification, SNP analysis, and next-generation sequencing to identify variants.[6,12,13] Before PGT-M, genetic counseling educates couples about the condition and options, allowing informed decisions.[14] Single embryo transfer is recommended after PGT-M.[14]

Though technology has improved, with <1% misdiagnosis risk, PGT-M remains a screening method.[15,16] Errors can occur due to technical, biological and human factors. Chinese guidelines recommend prenatal diagnosis after PGT-M to confirm results and avoid adverse outcomes or transmission of pathogenic variants missed by PGT-M.[13] Noninvasive prenatal testing is not currently recommended.[17] While prenatal diagnosis also has limitations, informing families allows maximum prevention of transmission and achievement of eugenic goals.[17]

Here, we used WES to identify SRD5A2 variants in a family with PPSH, enriching the variant spectrum and providing a precise tool for carriers seeking pregnancy, and achieved a high level of patient satisfaction. We recommend PGT-M and prenatal diagnosis for couples with adverse pregnancy history to prevent familial transmission of disease-causing variants.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the patients for participating in this study.

Author contributions

Investigation: Wenjing Shi.

Methodology: Qin Yan.

Project administration: Xingyu Bi.

Resources: Pengfei Zhu.

Supervision: Xueqing Wu.

Validation: Dongdong Zhang.

Writing – original draft: Jiayao Chen.

Writing – review & editing: Jiayao Chen, Zhiping Zhang.

Abbreviations:

CNV
copy number variation
DHT
dihydrotestosterone
HCG
human chorionic gonadotropin
PGT
preimplantation genetic testing
PGT-M
preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders
PPSH
pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias
WES
Whole-exome sequencing
WGA
Whole genome amplification

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

We obtained informed consent from the couple and their families.

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

This report was funded by Innovation plan of Medical Science and Technology of “Four in a batch” (2020TD19) and Various projects of Shanxi Province’s 2023 Graduate Education Innovation Plan (2023KY424).

How to cite this article: Chen J, Zhang Z, Shi W, Yan Q, Bi X, Zhu P, Zhang D, Wu X. Preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis in a family with pseudovaginal perineoscrotal hypospadias: A case report. Medicine 2023;102:46(e36171).

Contributor Information

Jiayao Chen, Email: chenjiayao2021@126.com.

Zhiping Zhang, Email: Zhangdd800@163.com.

Wenjing Shi, Email: 15824907915@163.com.

Qin Yan, Email: 354834954@qq.com.

Xingyu Bi, Email: 75790288@qq.com.

Pengfei Zhu, Email: pfzhu521@126.com.

Dongdong Zhang, Email: Zhangdd800@163.com.

References

  • [1].Gui B, Song Y, Su Z, et al. New insights into 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency based on a multi-centre study: regional distribution and genotype – phenotype profiling ofSRD5A2 in 190 Chinese patients. J Med Genet. 2019;56:685–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Avendaño A, Paradisi I, Cammarata-Scalisi F, et al. 5-α-Reductase type 2 deficiency: is there a genotype-phenotype correlation? A review. Hormones (Athens, Greece). 2018;17:197–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Chu GM, Li PP, Chang WJ, et al. Variant analysis on steroid 5-reductase type 2 deficiency caused by a novel SRD5A2 mutation (SRD5A2基因新型复合杂合突变致类固醇5-α还原酶2型缺乏症的遗传变异分析). Chin J Contemp Pediatr. 2020;22:790–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Wang BY, He YM, Xue YS, et al. Factors associated with the outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction (胚胎种植前遗传学检测助孕妊娠结局的影响因素研究). Chinese Gen Practice. 2023;26:160–7. [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Xu NX, Huang HF, Xu CM. Focus on the development of preimplantation genetic testing in the field of birth defects and rare diseases prevention and control (关注植入前胚胎遗传学检测技术在出生缺陷和罕见病预防与控制领域的开展). Chin J PrevMed. 2021;55:805–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Professional Committee on Reproductive Medicine, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; The Society of Medical Geneticists, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. A Chinese experts’ consensus on preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders. Chin J Reprod Contracep. 2021;41:477–85. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Fan L, Song Y, Polak M, et al. Clinical characteristics and genotype-phenotype correlations of 130 Chinese children in a high-homogeneity single-center cohort with 5α-reductase 2 deficiency. Mol Genet Genom Med. 2020;8:e1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Seo J, Shin S, Kim S, et al. The genotype-phenotype correlation in human 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency: classified and analyzed from a SRD5A2 structural perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:3297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Batista RL, Mendonca BB. The molecular basis of 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency. Sex Dev. 2022;16:171–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].An JX, Wang ZQ, Ni YL, et al. A case of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic Parkinson’s disease type 15 caused by mutation of FBXO7 (帕金森病15型基因突变携带者行胚胎植入前单基因遗传学检测助孕成功一例). J Int Reprod Health/Fam Plan. 2022;41:12–7. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Hardy T. The role of prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene conditions: a historical overview of evolving technologies and clinical practice. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40:647–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Kim S, Misra A. SNP genotyping: technologies and biomedical applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:289–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Gao C, Yang R, Wang Y, et al. Current status and new progress of the preimplantation genetic testing (植入前遗传学检测技术的现状及新进展). Chin J Reprod Contracep. 2019;39:67–74. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Bunnell ME, Dobson LJ, Lanes A, et al. Use of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and subsequent prenatal care and diagnostic testing. Prenat Diagn. 2022;42:1022–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Handyside AH KEHK. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;6268:768–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Handyside AH, Pattinson JK, Penketh RJ, et al. Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification. Lancet. 1989;1:347–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Xu CM. Professional committee on preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening techniqus (胚胎植入前遗传学诊断/筛查技术专家共识). Chinese J Prenatal Diagn (Electronic Version). 2018;10:57. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES