Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1983 Mar;71(3):531–535. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.3.531

Transport and Metabolism of Sucrose versus Hexoses in Relation to Growth in Etiolated Pea Stem 1

Rangil Singh 1,2, Gordon Maclachlan 1
PMCID: PMC1066072  PMID: 16662861

Abstract

Sucrose, supplied to detached pea (Pisum sativum L. var Alaska) epicotyls through cut bases, supported better growth of apical tissue than supplied glucose and/or fructose. The hexoses were converted mainly to sucrose in basal regions of the epicotyl but some moved as such through the epicotyl and accumulated at the apex (plumule) at a rate faster than sucrose. A greater proportion of the carbon derived from supplied hexoses than from sucrose was used for synthesis of ethanol-insoluble products throughout the epicotyl. By use of asymmetrically labeled sucrose, it was shown that neither hexose moiety was used preferentially for the synthesis of metabolites. Supplied sucrose moved as such only up to the region of cell elongation where it was hydrolyzed and completely equilibrated before moving into more apical regions. The results indicate that better growth with supplied sucrose than hexose could not have resulted from differential effects on cell division, more rapid uptake or transport of sucrose, enhanced wall synthesis, or cleavage by sucrose synthase. It is concluded that transported sucrose versus hexoses must undergo or evoke different reactions which affect growth in the region of cell elongation.

Full text

PDF
531

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnold W. N. The selection of sucrose as the translocate of higher plants. J Theor Biol. 1968 Oct;21(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(68)90056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Giaquinta R. Sucrose Hydrolysis in Relation to Phloem Translocation in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1977 Sep;60(3):339–343. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.3.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jourdan P. S., Mansell R. L. Isolation and partial characterization of three glucosyl transferases involved in the biosynthesis of flavonol triglucosides in Pisum sativum L. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1982 Feb;213(2):434–443. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(82)90569-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kriedemann P., Beevers H. Sugar Uptake and Translocation in the Castor Bean Seedling II. Sugar Transformations During Uptake. Plant Physiol. 1967 Feb;42(2):174–180. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.2.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. NEUFELD E. F., HASSID W. Z. BIOSYNTHESIS OF SACCHARIDES FROM GLYCOPYRANOSYL ESTERS OF NUCLEOTIDES ("SUGAR NUCLEOTIDES"). Adv Carbohydr Chem. 1963;18:309–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Partridge S. M. Filter-paper partition chromatography of sugars: 1. General description and application to the qualitative analysis of sugars in apple juice, egg white and foetal blood of sheep. with a note by R. G. Westall. Biochem J. 1948;42(2):238–250. doi: 10.1042/bj0420238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sutter A., Grisebach H. Free reversibility of the UDP-glucose: flavonol 3-O-glucosyltransferase reaction. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1975 Apr;167(2):444–447. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(75)90485-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. TREVELYAN W. E., PROCTER D. P., HARRISON J. S. Detection of sugars on paper chromatograms. Nature. 1950 Sep 9;166(4219):444–445. doi: 10.1038/166444b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Trip P., Nelson C. D., Krotkov G. Selective and Preferential Translocation of C-Labeled Sugars in White Ash and Lilac. Plant Physiol. 1965 Jul;40(4):740–747. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.4.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES