Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Sep 8;38(11):1153–1164. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01044-x

A comprehensive analysis of all-cause and cause-specific excess deaths in 30 countries during 2020

Gianfranco Alicandro 1,2,, Carlo La Vecchia 3, Nazrul Islam 4,5, Margherita Pizzato 3
PMCID: PMC10663248  PMID: 37684387

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 on mortality from specific causes of death remains poorly understood. This study analysed cause-of-death data provided by the World Health Organization from 2011 to 2019 to estimate excess deaths in 2020 in 30 countries. Over-dispersed Poisson regression models were used to estimate the number of deaths that would have been expected if the pandemic had not occurred, separately for men and women. The models included year and age categories to account for temporal trends and changes in size and age structure of the populations. Excess deaths were calculated by subtracting observed deaths from expected ones. Our analysis revealed significant excess deaths from ischemic heart diseases (IHD) (in 10 countries), cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) (in 10 countries), and diabetes (in 19 countries). The majority of countries experienced excess mortality greater than 10%, including Mexico (+ 38·8% for IHD, + 34·9% for diabetes), Guatemala (+ 30·0% for IHD, + 10·2% for CVD, + 39·7% for diabetes), Cuba (+ 18·8% for diabetes), Brazil (+ 12·9% for diabetes), the USA (+ 15·1% for diabetes), Slovenia (+ 33·8% for diabetes), Poland (+ 30·2% for IHD, + 19·5% for CVD, + 26 1% for diabetes), Estonia (+ 26·9% for CVD, + 34·7% for diabetes), Bulgaria (+ 22·8% for IHD, + 11·4% for diabetes), Spain (+ 19·7% for diabetes), Italy (+ 18·0% for diabetes), Lithuania (+ 17·6% for diabetes), Finland (+ 13·2% for diabetes) and Georgia (+ 10·7% for IHD, + 19·0% for diabetes). In 2020, 22 out of 30 countries had a significant increase in total mortality. Some of this excess was attributed to COVID-19, but a substantial increase was also observed in deaths attributed to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-023-01044-x.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Mortality, Excess deaths, Cardiovascular diseases, Diabetes

Introduction

During the first two years of the pandemic 5.4 million deaths were reported worldwide due to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) [1]. This figure involves uncertainty and does not cover the full burden of the pandemic, as it leaves out the number of deaths that were not officially attributed to COVID-19 and it also ignores the indirect effects resulting from the disruption and reorganization of the healthcare systems during the pandemic [2].

It soon became clear that the number of COVID-19 deaths was not a good indicator of the real impact of the pandemic. Thus, researchers turned their attention to total excess deaths, defined as the difference between the number of observed deaths from any cause and the number of deaths that would have been expected on the basis of past trends [2]. This indicator is not affected by underdiagnosis and underreporting, and it also measures the indirect effects of the pandemic on other health conditions. However, total excess, being an indicator of overall impact, cannot provide any clue on the non-COVID conditions that have been the most affected by the pandemic.

Since the start of the pandemic, international organizations and independent research groups have made several attempts to estimate total excess deaths [1, 35]. However, information on excess deaths from non-COVID-19 causes, as well as on disparities by sex and age group, remains sparse due to the limited availability of data.

It is also important to consider the impact of COVID-19 in different countries, as the excess in total mortality has varied widely, ranging from none in Australia and New Zealand to > 50% in some Latin American countries [1].

In this study, we provide estimates of excess mortality from some major non-COVID-19 causes in 2020 for 30 countries.

Data sources and methods

We used publicly available data on death counts by cause and population data by sex, age and country for the period 2011–2020. Mortality and population data were downloaded from the World Health Organization (WHO) mortality database [6]. When population data for the whole period were not available in the WHO database, we used the EUROSTAT database for the European countries and the United Nations database for the rest of the countries [7, 8].

We considered total mortality and mortality from selected major groups of causes of death, aggregated according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10): neoplasms (ICD-10 codes: C00-D48), diabetes (ICD-10 codes: E10-E14), influenza and pneumonia (ICD-10: J09-J18), dementia and Alzheimer disease (ICD-10 codes: F00-F03, G30), all circulatory system diseases (ICD-10: I00-I99), ischemic heart diseases (ICD-10 codes: I20-I25), cerebrovascular diseases (ICD-10 codes: I60-I69), transport accidents (ICD-10 codes: V01-V99, Y85), suicides (ICD-10 codes: X60-X84, Y87.0) and ill-defined causes (ICD-10 codes: R00-R94, R96-R99). These groups of causes were chosen based on previous reports that showed possible increased risks or worsening of management during the pandemic periods [914]. The ICD-10 was also used to retrieve the number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 (ICD-10 codes: U07.1, U07.2, U09.9, U10.9).

We selected countries with complete (annually reported) mortality and population data from 2011 to 2020. To mitigate the influence of random fluctuations in mortality data caused by the small number of events for some of the causes considered, we excluded countries with < 10,000 deaths reported in 2020. Additionally, we excluded countries with completeness of cause-of-death data below 90% [15]. Completeness indicates the percentage of the total number of estimated deaths in the country that has been registered with cause-of-death information in the vital registration system.

We calculated the number of excess deaths in each country and for each group of causes by comparing the observed deaths in 2020 with the number of deaths that would have been expected if the pandemic had not occurred. To estimate the expected number of deaths we used the following over-dispersed Poisson regression model:

logEDeathsi,j=β0+β1Yeari+β2Agej+logPopi,j

The model was trained on a period spanning from 2011 to 2019, separately for each sex, country and cause of death. The model included: a linear term for calendar years to capture temporal trends in mortality; age groups to account for the effect of age on mortality risk; and the natural logarithm of the population as offset term. The offset term was used to account for the size of the population and changes in its age structure over the study period.

To obtain combined estimates for all the 30 countries considered, we extended the model by adding a main effect for country and a year-by-country interaction term:

logEDeathsi,j,k=β0+β1Yeari+β2Agej+β3Countryk+β4(Countryk×Yeari)+logPopi,j,k

Estimates obtained using the described model were then aggregated to have the expected deaths in all countries.

Due to the small number of events at young ages for some causes of death, we used three different classifications for age: 1) 0–4, 5–9, …, 85 + for all causes; 2) 0–39, 40–44, …, 85 + for selected causes of deaths excluding dementia and Alzheimer disease and 3) 0–59, 60–64, …, 85 + for dementia and Alzheimer disease. The coefficients of the models were derived by fitting the models on 2011–2019 data, i.e. before the outbreak of the pandemic, and then used to compute the number of expected deaths in 2020.

Excess deaths were presented both in absolute terms (i.e. the difference between observed and expected deaths) and relative terms (i.e. the percent relative differences, also known as P-score), and with empirical 95% confidence intervals (CI) obtained through a Monte Carlo simulation. We sampled 10,000 iterations from a multivariate normal distribution for each set of the model’s coefficients using the parameter estimates and the variance–covariance matrix. For each iteration, we computed the difference between the observed and the expected deaths and obtained the 95% CI using the normal approximation. Excess death estimates were considered statistically significant when the 95% CI of the point estimates did not include zero.

Due to the varying mortality risks associated with COVID-19 and other analysed conditions across different sex and age categories [16], we conducted a stratified analysis by sex and age groups (< 75 vs ≥ 75 years) in countries with populations of at least 10 million in 2020. We presented these results separately for countries with high-income and upper-middle-income economies, according to the World Bank classification [17].

To assess the robustness of our estimates to natural fluctuations in mortality from year to year, we performed a sensitivity analysis. We calculated the difference between the number of observed deaths and the expected deaths in 2019, using historical data from the preceding period (2011–2018). The expected deaths were estimated using the same model employed in the main analysis. We obtained P-scores based on these estimates, which were then compared with the P-scores obtained in 2020.

The analysis was conducted using the statistical software R (R version 4.2.0).

Results

Among the 140 countries in the WHO mortality database, 48 had complete mortality data from 2011 to 2020. After excluding countries with incomplete population data, those with less than 10,000 deaths in 2020 and those with completeness of cause-of-death data below 90%, 30 countries were included in our analysis. The flowchart outlining the procedure for the country selection is provided in the Supplementary Information.

The study analysed 18 European countries (Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland and the UK), 3 countries from South America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile), 4 countries from Central and North America (Mexico, Cuba, Guatemala, and the USA), 4 Asian and Oceanian countries (Israel, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Australia), and one African country (Mauritius).

Table 1 shows the total number of deaths registered in 2020, those attributed to COVID-19, and the estimates of the excess deaths in each of the countries included in the study. In Bulgaria, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and the USA the mortality rates from COVID-19 were ≥ 10 per 10,000 population, while rates < 1 per 10,000 were reported in Mauritius, Cuba, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Australia. For all selected countries combined, we estimated approximately 1.4 million excees deaths from any cause in 2020, corresponding to an excess mortality in relative terms of + 12.2%. Mexico had the highest excess in all-cause mortality in 2020 (+ 43·1%). The USA, Chile, and some European countries, including Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Slovenia and Spain, had an excess of around + 15%, while an excess of around 10% was observed in Guatemala, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the UK. Austria, Estonia, Finland, Israel, Estonia, Latvia and Argentina showed lower excesses, whereas no significant excess was detected in Denmark, Georgia, Germany, Mauritius, Cuba, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Australia. These excesses were not observed in 2019 (Supplementary Information).

Table 1.

Absolute and percent differences in the number of deaths from any cause registered in 2020 relative to the expected deaths, COVID-19 deaths and 2020 population, by country

Country Observed deaths Expected deaths Absolute difference (95% CI) Percent difference (95% CI) COVID-19 deaths COVID-19 deaths/absolute difference COVID-19 mortality rate (per 10,000) Population (thousands)
Austria 91,599 85,135 6464 (5197; 7730) 7.6 (6.1; 9.1) 6491 1.00 7.3 8916.8
Bulgaria 124,735 108,018 16,717 (15,476; 17,957) 15.5 (14.3; 16.6) 8554 0.51 12.3 6934.0
Czech Republic 129,289 112,025 17,264 (15,946; 18,581) 15.4 (14.2; 16.6) 10,539 0.61 9.8 10,700.2
Denmark 54,399 54,560  − 161 (− 1042; 720)  − 0.3 (− 1.9; 1.3) 1070  − 6.65 1.8 5824.7
Estonia 15,679 15,246 433 (124; 741) 2.8 (0.8; 4.9) 203 0.47 1.5 1329.0
Finland 55,498 54,673 825 (175; 1474) 1.5 (0.3; 2.7) 558 0.68 1.0 5525.3
Georgia 50,537 50,959  − 422 (− 2799; 1955)  − 0.8 (− 5.5; 3.8) 2587  − 6.13 6.9 3722.7
Germany 985,572 975,408 10,164 (− 2125; 22,453) 1.0 (− 0.2; 2.3) 39,758 3.91 4.8 83,160.9
Italy 740,443 641,248 99,195 (92,531; 105,858) 15.5 (14.4; 16.5) 78,141 0.79 13.1 59,641.5
Latvia 28,589 27,557 1032 (582; 1481) 3.7 (2.1; 5.4) 700 0.68 3.7 1900.4
Lithuania 43,547 38,904 4643 (3932; 5353) 11.9 (10.1; 13.8) 2266 0.49 8.1 2794.9
Netherlands 168,678 153,118 15,560 (13,489; 17,630) 10.2 (8.8; 11.5) 20,173 1.30 11.5 17,512.1
Poland 477,355 408,539 68,816 (64,736; 72,895) 16.8 (15.8; 17.8) 41,451 0.60 10.9 37,929.7
Serbia 116,774 100,300 16,474 (15,419; 17,528) 16.4 (15.4; 17.5) 10,352 0.63 15.0 6899.1
Slovenia 24,016 20,718 3298 (2911; 3684) 15.9 (14.1; 17.8) 3390 1.03 16.1 2100.1
Spain 493,776 424,718 69,058 (64,177; 73,938) 16.3 (15.1; 17.4) 74,839 1.08 15.8 47,355.7
Switzerland 76,195 68,550 7645 (6931; 8358) 11.2 (10.1; 12.2) 9294 1.22 10.8 8606.0
UK 688,805 627,838 60,967 (54,076; 67,857) 9.7 (8.6; 10.8) 81,354 1.33 12.1 67,078.5
Mauritius 11,060 11,166  − 106 (− 351; 139)  − 0.9 (− 3.1; 1.2) 10  − 0.09 0.1 1265.7
Argentina 370,413 344,271 26,142 (21,977; 30,306) 7.6 (6.4; 8.8) 52,344 2.00 11.6 45,195.8
Brazil 1,554,141 1,375,064 179,077 (167,981; 190,172) 13.0 (12.2; 13.8) 212,671 1.19 10.0 212,559.4
Chile 126,150 109,942 16,208 (14,990; 17,425) 14.7 (13.6; 15.8) 18,680 1.15 9.8 19,116.2
Cuba 112,384 113,138  − 754 (− 2135; 627)  − 0.7 (− 1.9; 0.6) 143  − 0.19 0.1 11,326.6
Guatemala 95,660 87,348 8312 (6879; 9744) 9.5 (7.9; 11.2) 7980 0.96 4.5 17,915.6
Mexico 1,065,607 744,746 320,861 (311,287; 330,434) 43.1 (41.8; 44.4) 200,200 0.62 15.5 128,932.8
USA 3,383,613 2,923,919 459,694 (433,207; 486,180) 15.7 (14.8; 16.6) 350,827 0.76 10.6 331,002.6
Israel 48,797 46,474 2323 (1621; 3024) 5.0 (3.5; 6.5) 3160 1.36 3.4 9215.1
Japan 1,372,317 1,368,778 3539 (− 9330; 16,408) 0.3 (− 0.7; 1.2) 3466 0.98 0.3 123,399.0
Republic of Korea 304,921 302,146 2775 (− 1076; 6626) 0.9 (− 0.4; 2.2) 950 0.34 0.2 51,349.3
Australia 161,293 169,284  − 7991 (− 9692; − 6289)  − 4.7 (− 5.7; − 3.7) 899  − 0.11 0.4 25,655.3
All countries 12,971,842 11,561,798 1,410,044 (1,256,997; 1,563,090) 12.2 (10.9; 13.5) 1,243,050 0.88 9.2 1,354,865

In absolute terms, the USA and Mexico had the highest number of excess deaths, with approximately 460 and 321 thousand additional deaths, respectively. Among the European countries, Italy was the country with the highest number of excess deaths (~ 99.000 deaths) followed by Spain (~ 69.000 deaths) and the UK (~ 61.000 deaths).

Out of the 22 countries which had excess mortality in 2020, 12 had a ratio of COVID-19 deaths to estimated excess deaths lower than one, indicating that reported COVID-19 did not account for all the excess deaths. Conversely, in countries with ratios above one, reported COVID-19 deaths exceeded the estimated total excess deaths. Some countries showed negative values, indicating that the observed number of deaths was below the expected number.

An overall excess mortality from ischemic heart diseases of approximately 86,000 deaths (+ 7.3%) was estimated for all the 30 countries considered (Table 2). A significant excess was detected in 10 countries, including Mexico (+ 38·8%), Poland (+ 30·2%), Guatemala (+ 30·0%), Bulgaria (+ 22·8%), Georgia (+ 10·7%), Cuba (+ 8·5%), the USA (+ 6·8%), the Czech Republic (+ 6·1%), Italy (+ 5·2%) and Lithuania (+ 4·3%). Poland and Bulgaria showed higher mortality from ischemic heart diseases also in 2019 compared to what was expected (+ 13.6% in Poland and + 7.5% in Bulgaria). However, the excess mortality in 2019 was considerably lower than that observed in 2020 (Supplementary Information).

Table 2.

Absolute and percent differences in the number of deaths from ischemic heart diseases registered in 2020 relative to the expected deaths, by country

Country Observed deaths Expected deaths Absolute difference (95% CI) Percent difference (95% CI)
Austria 13,445 13,442 3 (− 418; 424) 0 (− 3.1; 3.2)
Bulgaria 15,244 12,417 2827 (2293; 3360) 22.8 (18.5; 27.1)
Czech Republic 23,353 22,002 1351 (701; 2000) 6.1 (3.2; 9.1)
Denmark 3328 3194 134 (− 18; 286) 4.2 (− 0.6; 9.0)
Estonia 2119 2400  − 281 (− 394; − 167)  − 11.7 (− 16.4; − 7.0)
Finland 8600 8764  − 164 (− 427; 99)  − 1.9 (− 4.9; 1.1)
Georgia 5787 5227 560 (110; 1009) 10.7 (2.1; 19.3)
Germany 121,462 122,219  − 757 (− 4177; 2663)  − 0.6 (− 3.4; 2.2)
Italy 63,356 60,216 3140 (1593; 4686) 5.2 (2.6; 7.8)
Latvia 6586 6350 236 (− 16; 488) 3.7 (− 0.3; 7.7)
Lithuania 14,216 13,625 591 (84; 1097) 4.3 (0.6; 8.1)
Netherlands 8037 7811 226 (− 105; 557) 2.9 (− 1.3; 7.1)
Poland 54,403 41,774 12,629 (10,783; 14,474) 30.2 (25.8; 34.6)
Serbia 8791 8782 9 (− 375; 393) 0.1 (− 4.3; 4.5)
Slovenia 1768 1856  − 88 (− 195; 19)  − 4.7 (− 10.5; 1.0)
Spain 29,654 29,220 434 (− 619; 1487) 1.5 (− 2.1; 5.1)
Switzerland 6822 6623 199 (− 19; 417) 3.0 (− 0.3; 6.3)
UK 64,050 61,879 2171 (− 428; 4770) 3.5 (− 0.7; 7.7)
Mauritius 1313 1320  − 7 (− 123; 109)  − 0.5 (− 9.3; 8.3)
Argentina 22,520 22,808  − 288 (− 1549; 973)  − 1.3 (− 6.8; 4.3)
Brazil 109,490 120,286  − 10,796 (− 19,415; − 2176)  − 9 (− 16.1; − 1.8)
Chile 7959 8341  − 382 (− 881; 117)  − 4.6 (− 10.6; 1.4)
Cuba 18,781 17,305 1476 (785; 2166) 8.5 (4.5; 12.5)
Guatemala 8050 6194 1856 (1192; 2519) 30.0 (19.2; 40.7)
Mexico 163,685 117,889 45,796 (37,640; 53,951) 38.8 (31.9; 45.8)
USA 382,803 358,268 24,535 (7421; 41,648) 6.8 (2.1; 11.6)
Israel 3701 3514 187 (− 1; 375) 5.3 (0; 10.7)
Japan 67,278 65,314 1964 (− 255; 4183) 3.0 (− 0.4; 6.4)
Republic of Korea 14,055 14,321  − 266 (− 1033; 501)  − 1.9 (− 7.2; 3.5)
Australia 16,587 17,698  − 1111 (− 1962; − 259)  − 6.3 (− 11.1; − 1.5)
All countries 1,267,243 1,180,755 86,488 (63,596; 109,379) 7.3 (5.4; 9.3)

The overall estimate indicate a 2.1% excess mortality from cerebrovascular diseases when considering all countries combined. However, 10 countries showed higher excesses, including Estonia (+ 26·9%), Poland (+ 19·5%), Guatemala (+ 10·2%), Bulgaria (+ 8·7%), Cuba (+ 6·3%), Czech Republic (+ 4·7%), Italy (+ 4·7%), Serbia (+ 4·6%), the USA (+ 4·1%) and Spain (+ 3·3%) (Table 3). Estonia showed higher mortality than expected from cerebrovascular diseases also in 2019 (+ 39.9%) (Supplementary Information). Estimates of all cardiovascular causes are given in the Supplementary Information.

Table 3.

Absolute and percent differences in the number of deaths from cerebrovascular diseases registered in 2020 relative to the expected deaths, by country

Country Observed deaths Expected deaths Absolute difference (95% CI) Percent difference (95% CI)
Austria 4737 4582 155 (− 26; 336) 3.4 (− 0.6; 7.3)
Bulgaria 22,010 20,254 1756 (1141; 2370) 8.7 (5.6; 11.7)
Czech Republic 7552 7213 339 (99; 578) 4.7 (1.4; 8.0)
Denmark 3007 3133  − 126 (− 261; 9)  − 4.0 (− 8.3; 0.3)
Estonia 1093 861 232 (164; 299) 26.9 (19.0; 34.7)
Finland 4026 3953 73 (− 93; 239) 1.8 (− 2.4; 6.0)
Georgia 10,146 10,079 67 (− 652; 786) 0.7 (− 6.5; 7.8)
Germany 53,308 53,833  − 525 (− 1894; 844)  − 1.0 (− 3.5; 1.6)
Italy 57,061 54,493 2568 (1394; 3741) 4.7 (2.6; 6.9)
Latvia 5120 5369  − 249 (− 476; − 21)  − 4.6 (− 8.9; − 0.4)
Lithuania 5226 5049 177 (− 40; 394) 3.5 (− 0.8; 7.8)
Netherlands 8850 9371  − 521 (− 850; − 191)  − 5.6 (− 9.1; − 2.0)
Poland 32,540 27,221 5319 (4214; 6423) 19.5 (15.5; 23.6)
Serbia 9851 9420 431 (121; 740) 4.6 (1.3; 7.9)
Slovenia 1939 1955  − 16 (− 111; 79)  − 0.8 (− 5.7; 4.0)
Spain 25,817 25,004 813 (157; 1468) 3.3 (0.6; 5.9)
Switzerland 3524 3396 128 (− 3; 259) 3.8 (− 0.1; 7.6)
UK 34,460 34,478  − 18 (− 1162; 1126)  − 0.1 (− 3.4; 3.3)
Mauritius 948 1001  − 53 (− 154; 48)  − 5.3 (− 15.4; 4.8)
Argentina 17,479 19,985  − 2506 (− 3628; − 1383)  − 12.5 (− 18.2; − 6.9)
Brazil 98,812 100,774  − 1962 (− 8094; 4170)  − 1.9 (− 8.0; 4.1)
Chile 7948 7806 142 (− 265; 549) 1.8 (− 3.4; 7.0)
Cuba 10,975 10,325 650 (249; 1050) 6.3 (2.4; 10.2)
Guatemala 3606 3273 333 (32; 633) 10.2 (1.0; 19.3)
Mexico 36,182 35,513 669 (− 1358; 2696) 1.9 (− 3.8; 7.6)
USA 160,262 153,993 6269 (522; 12,015) 4.1 (0.3; 7.8)
Israel 2178 2103 75 (− 45; 195) 3.6 (− 2.1; 9.3)
Japan 102,960 101,521 1439 (− 1764; 4642) 1.4 (− 1.7; 4.6)
Republic of Korea 21,858 21,491 367 (− 670; 1404) 1.7 (− 3.1; 6.5)
Australia 9469 9807  − 338 (− 704; 28)  − 3.4 (− 7.2; 0.3)
All countries 762,944 746,960 15,984 (7407; 24,560) 2.1 (1.0; 3.3)

Approximately 76,000 excess deaths were estimated for diabetes in the 30 countries included in the analysis, accounting for an excess mortality of + 18.3% (Table 4). Significant excesses were detected in 19 countries, including Guatemala (+ 39·7%), Mexico (+ 34·9%), Estonia (+ 34·7%), Slovenia (+ 33·8%), Poland (+ 26·1%), Spain (+ 19·7%), Georgia (+ 19·0%), Cuba (+ 18·8%), Italy (+ 18·0%), Lithuania (+ 17·6%), the USA (+ 15·1%), Finland (+ 13·2%), Brazil (+ 12·9%), Bulgaria (+ 11·4%), the UK (+ 8·6%), Israel (+ 6·7%), Serbia (+ 6·1%), Germany (+ 4·6%), and Japan (+ 3·7%). Slovenia, Lithuania and Georgia also experienced higher mortality from diabetes than expected in 2019, with excesses of + 24 2%, + 22 9% and + 28 6%, respectively (Supplementary Information).

Table 4.

Absolute and percent differences in the number of deaths from diabetes registered in 2020 relative to the expected deaths, by country

Country Observed deaths Expected deaths Absolute difference (95% CI) Percent difference (95% CI)
Austria 2855 3077  − 222 (− 382; − 61)  − 7.2 (− 12.4; − 2.0)
Bulgaria 1769 1588 181 (74; 287) 11.4 (4.7; 18.1)
Czech Republic 4993 4780 213 (− 58; 484) 4.5 (− 1.2; 10.1)
Denmark 1253 1368  − 115 (− 209; − 20)  − 8.4 (− 15.3; − 1.5)
Estonia 334 248 86 (46; 125) 34.7 (18.5; 50.4)
Finland 667 589 78 (19; 136) 13.2 (3.2; 23.1)
Georgia 977 821 156 (63; 248) 19.0 (7.7; 30.2)
Germany 25,807 24,673 1134 (420; 1847) 4.6 (1.7; 7.5)
Italy 25,513 21,627 3886 (3274; 4497) 18.0 (15.1; 20.8)
Latvia 700 638 62 (0; 123) 9.7 (0.0; 19.3)
Lithuania 688 585 103 (29; 176) 17.6 (5.0; 30.1)
Netherlands 2799 2690 109 (− 31; 249) 4.1 (− 1.2; 9.3)
Poland 12,160 9640 2520 (2062; 2977) 26.1 (21.4; 30.9)
Serbia 3394 3200 194 (14; 373) 6.1 (0.4; 11.7)
Slovenia 443 331 112 (74; 149) 33.8 (22.4; 45.0)
Spain 11,297 9440 1857 (1563; 2150) 19.7 (16.6; 22.8)
Switzerland 1011 1197  − 186 (− 263; − 108)  − 15.5 (− 22.0; − 9.0)
UK 8902 8200 702 (267; 1136) 8.6 (3.3; 13.9)
Mauritius 2310 2321  − 11 (− 189; 167)  − 0.5 (− 8.1; 7.2)
Argentina 9800 9582 218 (− 329; 765) 2.3 (− 3.4; 8.0)
Brazil 75,704 67,081 8623 (4880; 12,365) 12.9 (7.3; 18.4)
Chile 3665 3928  − 263 (− 604; 78)  − 6.7 (− 15.4; 2.0)
Cuba 2887 2430 457 (307; 606) 18.8 (12.6; 24.9)
Guatemala 9996 7154 2842 (1961; 3722) 39.7 (27.4; 52.0)
Mexico 148,596 110,129 38,467 (29,948; 46,985) 34.9 (27.2; 42.7)
USA 102,187 88,785 13,402 (7869; 18,934) 15.1 (8.9; 21.3)
Israel 2598 2435 163 (30; 295) 6.7 (1.2; 12.1)
Japan 13,899 13,401 498 (6; 989) 3.7 (0; 7.4)
Republic of Korea 8455 8167 288 (− 135; 711) 3.5 (− 1.7; 8.7)
Australia 5148 5098 50 (− 202; 302) 1.0 (− 4.0; 5.9)
All countries 490,807 414,864 75,943 (65,184; 86,701) 18.3 (15.7; 20.9)

An excess mortality was observed from influenza and pneumonia in Bulgaria (+ 120·2%), Mexico (+ 83·5%), and Serbia (+ 57·0%); from dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in Chile (+ 16·5%), Poland (+ 16·2%), Slovenia (+ 16·2%) and the USA (+ 6·1%). Deaths assigned to ill-defined causes also increased in 20 countries, including Mauritius (+ 302%), Latvia (+ 95·2%), the Czech Republic (+ 84·5%), Italy (+ 64·5%), Australia (+ 69·0%), Serbia (+ 57·4%), the USA (+ 39·9%), Brazil (+ 26·8%), Mexico (+ 24·5%), the Republic of Korea (+ 21·9%), the Netherlands (+ 22·8%), the UK (+ 17·7%), Argentina (+ 16·9%), Denmark (+ 14%), Bulgaria (+ 12·3%), Switzerland (+ 8·5%) and Austria (+ 8·4%) (Supplementary Information).

Figure 1 shows the percent difference between observed and expected deaths (P-score) from ischemic heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes in 2020 by sex and age group (< 75 vs. ≥ 75 years) in the 12 high-income countries with a population size ≥ 10 million. Corresponding data for upper-middle-income countries are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Percent difference between observed and expected deaths (P-score) from ischemic heart diseases, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes by sex and age group (< 75 vs. ≥ 75 years), in 12 high-income countries (gross national income per capita of $13,205 or more) with population size ≥ 10 million. CZE: Czech Republic. GER: Germany. ITA: Italy. NET: Netherlands. POL: Poland. SPA: Spain. UK: United Kingdom. CHI: Chile. USA: United States of America. JAP: Japan. KOR: Republic of Korea. AUS: Australia

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Percent difference between observed and expected deaths (P-score) from ischemic heart diseases, cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes by sex and age group (< 75 vs. ≥ 75 years), in 5 upper-middle-income countries (gross national income per capita between $4256 and $13,205) with population size ≥ 10 million. ARG: Argentina. BRA: Brazil. CUB: Cuba. GUA: Guatemala. MEX: Mexico

There were no clear differences by sex, except for diabetes in Guatemala and Mexico (only for ages < 75 years) where males had higher excess mortality. In Spain, the UK, the USA and Japan, a significant excess mortality from ischemic heart diseases was observed only at ages < 75 years, as was the case for cerebrovascular diseases in the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, and Japan. Excess mortality from diabetes was higher at ages ≥ 75 years in the Czech Republic, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the Republic of Korea compared to younger ages. Detailed estimates for all the causes considered are reported in the Supplementary Information.

Discussion

This study assessed mortality from non-COVID-19 conditions in 30 countries during the first year of the pandemic. It revealed significant increases in mortality from ischemic heart and cerebrovascular diseases in about a third of the selected countries, as well as from diabetes in the majority of the countries considered. These increases were generally more pronounced in South American countries and, for diabetes, also in Eastern European ones. It also found that in high-income countries, the excess mortality from cardiovascular diseases affected individuals aged < 75 years to a greater extent. In most countries, there were excesses in ill-defined causes of death, while no excess was observed in cancer mortality.

Substantial variation in cause-specific excess mortality emerged between countries with advanced and well-organized healthcare systems, such as Denmark, Germany, Japan, and Australia, and other high-income countries like the USA and Italy, whose healthcare systems were inadequately prepared and severely affected by the pandemic.

Consistent with previous studies, our research has revealed that a significant proportion of excess deaths in 2020 were not attributed to COVID-19 [18, 19]. For example, in the USA, a study evaluating excess mortality from March 1, 2020 to January 2, 2021, found that only 72% of the overall excess mortality has been attributed to COVID-19. Our results, which indicate that 76% of excess deaths were attributed to COVID-19, are consistent with that estimate. This underestimation, although to varying degrees, has been observed in other countries as well, raising doubts about whether the excess deaths from causes other than COVID-19 can be partly attributed to errors in the certification of the cause of death.

Data on cause-specific excess deaths are limited to a few countries where different methods have been used to estimate expected deaths [914]. Most studies rely on the average number of deaths registered in a period preceding the pandemic, thus ignoring temporal trends and changes in size and structure of the population. Despite the differences in methodologies, these studies reported a consistent excess in diabetes-related deaths in Italy (+ 19%) [10], the USA (+ 16%) [14], the Republic of Korea (+ 10·4%) [13] and Mexico (+ 36·8%) [12]. Excesses of 5% for heart and 7% for cerebrovascular diseases were estimated in the USA, [14] and similar excesses for all cardiovascular diseases were reported in Poland (+ 5·9%) [20]. Higher excesses were found in Mexico for ischemic heart (+ 32·5%) and hypertensive diseases (+ 25·0%) [12].

During the initial phase of the pandemic, it became apparent that patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases and related risk factors, such as hypertension and diabetes were at greater risk of developing severe COVID-19. Although younger patients with COVID-19 have a lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, those who have hypertension, diabetes, or pre-existing cardiovascular diseases were also at relatively higher risk of poor outcomes compared to older patients [21]. The main reasons for this remain to be clarified, but it has been suggested that young patients may have experienced a higher occurrence of inflammation-related complications and may have been less aware of cardiovascular symptoms [22]. Other major risk factors, including smoking, dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension are associated to a greater relative risk of cardiovascular events in the middle-aged than in the elderly [23].

SARS-CoV-2 infection can also lead to the development of de novo cardiovascular conditions, and a history of COVID-19 should be considered a cardiovascular risk factor per se.

COVID-19 has been linked to cardiovascular dysfunction and complications, which can occur both in the acute and post-acute phases of the infection [24]. Up to 62% of COVID-19 hospitalized patients experience acute cardiac injury, as indicated by elevated cardiac biomarkers. This condition, when associated with thromboembolic disorders, can lead to fatal outcomes during the early phase of the infection [25]. Beyond the first 30 days and up to one year, patients remained at higher risk of developing a range of cardiovascular conditions, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmias, myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke and thromboembolic disorders [26]. This increased risk may contribute to the persistently higher all-cause mortality observed in patients after the acute phase of the infection. According to a study based on UK Biobank data, COVID-19 patients are approximately 10 times more likely to die from any cause after 30 days from infection and up to an average follow-up of 141 days as compared to uninfected controls [27]. Long-term cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 have also been observed through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, showing evidence of myocardial fibrosis, and functional impairment [28].

The underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular dysfunction and heart injury are complex and multifactorial, including direct viral injury of cardiac cells and indirect pathological mechanisms such as hypoxia-induced myocardial injury, and mechanisms mediated by the immune response such as vasculitis, endotheliitis, microvascular injury and thrombosis [29].

The excess mortality from diabetes suggests the coexistence of two pathological pathways: (1) COVID-19 leads to de novo diabetes in individuals who may not have developed it otherwise; (2) COVID-19 can accelerate the progression to diabetes in patients with pre-existing metabolic disorders. The diabetogenic effect of COVID-19 has been related to inflammation and oxidative stress, which can lead to pleiotropic alterations in glucose metabolism, including impaired insulin activity and insulin resistance [30]. Additionally, high-dose corticosteroid therapy used to manage lung damage caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection may have contributed to rapid deterioration of glycaemic control, resulting in a new-onset diabetes or exacerbating pre-existing metabolic disorders [31].

As the pandemic has unfolded, health services and social care sectors have faced mounting pressure, leading to a contraction of healthcare delivery for chronic diseases. With medical resources mostly redirected to assist COVID-19 patients, non-COVID-19 ones have experienced difficulties in accessing healthcare services. Fear of contracting COVID-19 and a sense of vulnerability have also discouraged individuals from seeking healthcare services, especially during lockdown periods. The pandemic presented significant challenges for patients requiring careful daily management, such as those with diabetes. Without professional guidance, some may have struggled to control their glycaemic levels, adhere to treatment, and manage complications of the disease. For other health conditions, such as cancer, the lower screening rates, and delays in diagnosis and treatment during the pandemic may have had a negative impact on prognosis, with effects that may only be seen in the decades to come [32].

The varying impact observed in each country can be attributed to several factors, including: (1) the timing of implementing, intensity and effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical measures to contain the transmission, such as restricting internal movements and gatherings, the closing of schools, workplaces and shops and mandating mask-wearing [33]; (2) the ability to promptly track COVID-19 cases and implement epidemiological monitoring; (3) the different age structures and prevalence of comorbidities in each country; (4) the different resources available for managing and treating COVID-19 and its complications; (5) the diagnostic capacity for recognizing new cardiovascular events after infection.

When interpreting our results, it is important to note that certification of causes of death is prone to underreporting. The extent to which underreporting impacted our estimate of excess mortality is difficult to quantify, but it is likely that diabetes was particularly affected. This is because diabetes is often considered a comorbidity rather than a direct cause of death with less than 50% of the death certificates of diabetic patients reporting diabetes as cause of death [34]. During the early phases of the pandemic, proper certification of deaths became even more difficult, likely resulting in the assignment of some deaths to ill-defined causes, for example to ICD-10 codes within the chapter of symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, as well as to unspecified pneumonia. This can be inferred from the high number of excess deaths attributed to these causes in certain countries, which is unlikely to be ascribed to random fluctuations. For example, deaths from pneumonia and influenza in Bulgaria were 3025 in 2020, compared to a range of 1296 to 1497 during the previous period (2011–2019). Similarly, in Mauritius, there were 514 deaths from ill-defined causes in 2020, compared to a range of 127 to 214 deaths reported in previous years (2011–2019). In the Czech Republic, there were 3676 deaths from ill-defined causes in 2020, whereas the range in the previous years was between 1137 and 1908 deaths. Moreover, in some countries, there were fewer deaths than expected for certain groups of causes, and this could be attributed to COVID-19 having a competing effect over other causes of death. As a result, our estimates probably underestimate the true impact of the pandemic on cardiovascular mortality and mortality from diabetes.

To test the robusteness of our estimates, we compared the cause-specific expected deaths with the observed deaths in 2019. No significant differences were overall observed, except for some excesses in some Eastern European countries, which, however were lower than those estimated for 2020. Improvement in the certification of causes of death could partly account for the observed excess in 2019.

Our estimates differ from those provided by other studies. Various attempts have been made to estimate excess mortality during the pandemic period, all based on the difference between observed deaths and expected deaths. The main difference lies in how the expected deaths were calculated. Most estimates use statistical models that incorporate multiple factors known to affect mortality, such as sex, age, population size, temporal trend, seasonality, heatwaves, and influenza outbreaks. These models may consider some of these factors. Another crucial factor affecting the observed differences is the choice of the baseline period used to train the model for expected deaths [35]. In our study, we used yearly mortality data covering a period of 9 years, from 2011 to 2019. Other studies used different models and baseline periods, resulting in similar results in some countries while varying in others. For instance, in a study we published in 2021 based on weekly mortality data, using a baseline period spanning from 2016 to 2019 and excluding weeks affected by heatwaves and influenza outbreaks, the total excess deaths for Germany, Italy and Spain were estimated at 25,900, 89,100 and 84,100, respectively [5]. That study was conducted using data collected during the first months of 2021 when countries only provided provisional data that were subsequently updated in later releases. According to the WHO, the estimates of total excess deaths in 2020, obtained using annual mortality data and a baseline period of 2015–2019, were 55,648 in Germany, 100,431 in Italy, and 72,576 in Spain. While our current estimate significantly differs from the WHO's estimate for Germany, the estimates for Italy and Spain align closely with those reported in our study.

The significant variation in estimates for Germany has been previously noted by two German researchers who, using actuarial science methods, estimated approximately 4000 excess deaths for 2020 [36]. Furthermore, our estimate of excess mortality for Germany (+ 1% in relative terms) aligns with the estimate provided in the work by Levitt et al., where all possible combinations of baseline periods were averaged [35].

Determining which approach outperforms the others is challenging. Nevertheless, a longer baseline period allows for a more comprehensive assessment of the trend in mortality rate and helps mitigate the effects of perturbations caused by heatwaves and influenza outbreaks, without completely eliminating them.

Finally, we measured the impact of the pandemic on causes of deaths other than COVID-19 during a period when vaccines were not available, treatment options were limited, the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants were different from those observed in subsequent years, and healthcare systems were overwhelmed. Today, the situation has greatly improved, and the number of severe cases of COVID-19 has dramatically reduced. However, it remains to be determined whether vaccinated patients who were infected by the variants circulating in 2021 and 2022 are still at an increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases and diabetes.

Conclusions

During the first year of the pandemic, when vaccines were not available, there was a significant excess mortality in 22 out of the 30 countries considered in this study. A significant increase was also observed in deaths related to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. The specific contributions of indirect pandemic effects versus direct effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection remain uncertain and require further investigation.

Author contributors

GA, MP and CLV conceived and designed the study. GA and MP directly accessed and verified the underlying data in this study. GA performed the data analysis. GA and MP drafted the original manuscript. CLV and NI contributed with critical input and revision to the manuscript. CLV was responsible for funding acquisition. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and accept responsibility to submit for publication.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research was supported by EU funding within the NextGeneration EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).

Data availability

All data used in this study are publicly available and have been cited in detail in the appendix.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Msemburi W, Karlinsky A, Knutson V, Aleshin-Guendel S, Chatterji S, Wakefield J. The WHO estimates of excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature. 2023;613:130–137. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05522-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Islam N. “Excess deaths” is the best metric for tracking the pandemic. BMJ. 2022;4:376. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 23]. p. 7. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
  • 4.Eurostat. Excess mortality - statistics - Statistics Explained [Internet]. Eurostat Stat. Explain. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 23]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Excess_mortality_-_statistics#Excess_mortality_in_the_EU_between_January_2020_and_July_2022
  • 5.Islam N, Shkolnikov VM, Acosta RJ, Klimkin I, Kawachi I, Irizarry RA, et al. Excess deaths associated with covid-19 pandemic in 2020: Age and sex disaggregated time series analysis in 29 high income countries. BMJ. 2020;2021:373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.WHO Mortality Database [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/data-collection-tools/who-mortality-database
  • 7.Eurostat. Database - Population and demography - Eurostat [Internet]. Statistics (Ber). 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 23]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demography/demography-population-stock-balance/database
  • 8.Home Page | Data Portal [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 23]. Available from: https://population.un.org/dataportal/home
  • 9.Yao XI, Han L, Sun Y, He D, Zhao S, Ran J. Temporal variation of excess deaths from diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16:483. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fedeli U, Casotto V, Schievano E, Bonora E, Zoppini G. Diabetes as a cause of death across different COVID-19 epidemic waves. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;190:109984. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grande E, Fedeli U, Pappagallo M, Crialesi R, Marchetti S, Minelli G, et al. Variation in cause-specific mortality rates in Italy during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a study based on nationwide data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Palacio-Mejía LS, Hernández-Ávila JE, Hernández-Ávila M, Dyer-Leal D, Barranco A, Quezada-Sánchez AD, et al. Leading causes of excess mortality in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020–2021: A death certificates study in a middle-income country. Lancet Reg Heal - Am. Lancet Reg Health Am; 2022;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Oh J, Min J, Kang C, Kim E, Lee JP, Kim H, et al. Excess mortality and the COVID-19 pandemic: causes of death and social inequalities. BMC Public Health 2022;22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Ruhm CJ. Excess deaths in the United States during the first year of COVID-19. Prev Med. 2022;162:107174. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. Completeness of cause-of-death data (%) [Internet]. Glob. Heal. Obs. [cited 2023 Jul 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/completeness-of-cause-of-death-data-(-)
  • 16.Geldsetzer P, Mukama T, Jawad NK, Riffe T, Rogers A, Sudharsanan N. Sex differences in the mortality rate for coronavirus disease 2019 compared to other causes of death: an analysis of population-wide data from 63 countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022;37:797–806. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00866-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.WBD. World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk [Internet]. World Bank. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 15]. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
  • 18.Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Sabo RT, Zimmerman EB. Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes in the US, March 1, 2020, to January 2, 2021. JAMA. 2021;325:1786–1789. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alicandro G, Remuzzi G, La Vecchia C. Italy’s first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has ended: no excess mortality in May, 2020. Lancet. 2020. p. e27–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Pikala M, Krzywicka M, Burzynska M. Excess mortality in Poland during the first and second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Front Public Health. 2020;2022:10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1048659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bae SA, Kim SR, Kim MN, Shim WJ, Park SM. Impact of cardiovascular disease and risk factors on fatal outcomes in patients with COVID-19 according to age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2021;107:373–380. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Trimaille A, Ribeyrolles S, Fauvel C, Chaumont C, Weizman O, Pommier T, et al. Cardiovascular characteristics and outcomes of young patients with COVID-19. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021;8:165. doi: 10.3390/jcdd8120165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Negri E, La Vecchia C, Nobili A, D’Avanzo B, Bechi S. Cigarette smoking and acute myocardial infarction - a case-control study from the GISSI-2 trial. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994;10:361–366. doi: 10.1007/BF01719657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wan EYF, Mathur S, Zhang R, Yan VKC, Lai FTT, Chui CSL, et al. Association of COVID-19 with short- and long-term risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a prospective cohort in UK Biobank. Cardiovasc Res; 2023. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:811–818. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xie Y, Xu E, Bowe B, Al-Aly Z. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2022;28:583–590. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01689-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raisi-Estabragh Z, Cooper J, Salih A, Raman B, Lee AM, Neubauer S, et al. Cardiovascular disease and mortality sequelae of COVID-19 in the UK Biobank. Heart Heart. 2022;109:119–126. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Petersen SE, Friedrich MG, Leiner T, Elias MD, Ferreira VM, Fenski M, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for patients With COVID-19. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:685–699. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hanson PJ, Liu-Fei F, Ng C, Minato TA, Lai C, Hossain AR, et al. Characterization of COVID-19-associated cardiac injury: evidence for a multifactorial disease in an autopsy cohort. Lab Investig. 2022;102:814–825. doi: 10.1038/s41374-022-00783-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Govender N, Khaliq OP, Moodley J, Naicker T. Insulin resistance in COVID-19 and diabetes. Prim Care Diabete. 2021;15:629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fetters KB, Judge SP, Daar ES, Hatlen TJ. Burden of hyperglycemia in patients receiving corticosteroids for severe COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022;6:484–487. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Angelini M, Teglia F, Astolfi L, Casolari G, Boffetta P. Decrease of cancer diagnosis during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2023;38:31–38. doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00946-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gu J, Yan H, Huang Y, Zhu Y, Sun H, Qiu Y, et al. Comparing containment measures among nations by epidemiological effects of COVID-19. Natl Sci Rev. 2020;7:1847–1851. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheng WS, Wingard DL, Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E. Sensitivity and specificity of death certificates for diabetes: as good as it gets? Diabetes Care Am Diabetes Assoc. 2008;31:279–284. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Levitt M, Zonta F, Ioannidis JPA. Excess death estimates from multiverse analysis in 2009–2021. Eur J Epidemiol. 2023;12:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00998-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuhbandner C, Reitzner M. Estimation of Excess Mortality in Germany During 2020-2022. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e39371. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this study are publicly available and have been cited in detail in the appendix.


Articles from European Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES