Abstract
The majority of oncogenic drivers are intracellular proteins, constraining their immunotherapeutic targeting to mutated peptides (neoantigens) presented by individual human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allotypes1. However, most cancers have a modest mutational burden that is insufficient for generating responses using neoantigen-based therapies2,3. Neuroblastoma is a paediatric cancer that harbours few mutations and is instead driven by epigenetically deregulated transcriptional networks4. Here we show that the neuroblastoma immunopeptidome is enriched with peptides derived from proteins essential for tumorigenesis. We focused on targeting the unmutated peptide QYNPIRTTF discovered on HLA-A*24:02, which is derived from the neuroblastoma-dependency gene and master transcriptional regulator PHOX2B. To target QYNPIRTTF, we developed peptide-centric chimeric antigen receptors (PC-CARs) through a counter panning strategy using predicted potentially cross-reactive peptides. We further proposed that PC-CARs can recognize peptides on additional HLA allotypes when presenting a similar overall molecular surface. Informed by our computational modelling results, we show that PHOX2B PC-CARs also recognize QYNPIRTTF presented by HLA-A*23:01, the most common non-A2 allele in people with African ancestry. Finally, we demonstrate potent and specific killing of neuroblastoma cells expressing these HLAs in vitro and complete tumour regression in mice. These data suggest that PC-CARs have the potential to expand the pool of immunotherapeutic targets to include non-immunogenic intracellular oncoproteins and allow targeting through additional HLA allotypes in a clinical setting.
Subject terms: MHC class I, Cancer immunotherapy
Peptide-centric chimeric antigen receptors (PC-CARs) provide a platform to address the challenges involved in targeting intracellular oncoproteins, and PC-CARs based on the neuroblastoma-dependency gene PHOX2B induce elimination of aggressive tumors.
Main
The curative potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-based cancer immunotherapies has been established in leukaemias, but such application in solid tumours has been limited by the paucity of known tumour-specific membrane proteins5. Although membrane proteins represent up to one quarter of the proteome, only a fraction of these are specifically expressed on tumour cells and not on normal tissues, and a smaller proportion are essential for tumour homeostasis6. Rather, most cancer-driver proteins reside in the cytoplasm or nucleus of the cell where they are accessible to the immune system only through the presentation of peptides on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
MHC class I proteins, encoded by the highly polymorphic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A, B and C genes, present a snapshot of the intracellular proteome on the cell surface (immunopeptidome) where T cells surveil peptide–MHC (pMHC) complexes for antigens derived from foreign pathogens. T cell recognition of mutation-derived pMHC neoantigens as non-self is the basis of curative responses achieved through immune checkpoint blockade and complete remissions using adoptive transfer of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes7. Nonetheless, only about 5% of these neoantigens are predicted to bind a given HLA allotype8, and only 1.6% of neoantigens are reported to be immunogenic3. Subclonal mutations and downregulation of mutated non-essential genes further constrain the pool of therapeutically relevant neoantigens. Consequently, a mutational threshold for effective neoantigen-based therapies is necessary, which is not surpassed in most cancers9. Tumour cells also present a plethora of unmutated self-peptides on MHC10, but these are largely immunogenically silent owing to negative thymic selection of T cells. We proposed that a subset of the immunopeptidome consists of tumour-specific peptides derived from essential oncoproteins and that these can be targeted using synthetic PC-CARs.
Peptides presented in the MHC groove make up only a small fraction of the extracellular pMHC molecular surface. The typical 8–14 amino acid peptide presented on MHC class I is composed of only about 2–3% of the amino acids in the pMHC complex and is spatially confined within the adjacent α-helices of the MHC groove. This poses major challenges for engineering peptide-specific single-chain antibody variable fragment (scFv) binders11. Furthermore, cross-reactivity of engineered receptors with peptides of biophysically similar molecular surfaces presented in normal tissues have resulted in significant toxicity and death12,13.
Neuroblastoma is a childhood cancer derived from tissue of the developing sympathetic nervous system and is often lethal despite intensive cytotoxic therapy14. These tumours are low in mutational burden15 and MHC expression16, which makes neuroblastoma both a challenging tumour to target with MHC-based immunotherapies and an ideal model for addressing the major problems currently hindering the wider advancement of cancer immunotherapies. As a tumour-derived from neural crest progenitor cells, neuroblastomas express a set of core regulatory circuit (CRC) transcription factors involved in maintaining cell fate, metabolism, migration, epigenetic states, growth and proliferation4. These genes are epigenetically silenced after terminal differentiation of normal neural tissues, but these developmental pathways are aberrantly hyperactivated in neuroblastoma. Here we present the discovery of recurring lineage-restricted oncoproteins presented on MHC, focusing on immunotherapeutic targeting of the neuroblastoma CRC master regulator PHOX2B using PC-CARs.
Identification of tumour-specific antigens
First, we surveyed the landscape of peptides accessible to T cells by performing MHC capture, peptide elution and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry17 (LC–MS/MS; immunopeptidomics) on eight neuroblastoma cell-derived xenografts (CDX) and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). These xenografts have a wide range of MHC expression and encompass the array of rare recurring mutations found in high-risk neuroblastoma18,19 (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Table 1a). We identified a total of 7,608 peptides from 8 tumours (1% false discovery rate (FDR); Supplementary Table 1). We did not find any of the 4,105 potential 8–14-amino-acid-long neoantigens imputed from tumour mutational data in the immunopeptidome, consistent with expected rates of neoantigen presentation and limited detection using ligandomics in low mutational tumours20. We first filtered the 7,608 peptides to select HLA binders with sufficient affinity to act as T cell epitopes using a predicted pMHC complex IC50 threshold of 500 nM, which produced 2,286 predicted strong binders. We then filtered for peptides derived from differentially expressed parent genes as determined from RNA sequencing data from 153 neuroblastoma tumours compared with 1,641 normal tissues (from the TARGET21 and GTEx17 databases, respectively). This analysis resulted in 61 peptides derived from genes with mRNA expression levels that were one log fold greater in the tumour for each normal tissue (P < 0.01). Finally, we filtered the remaining tumour peptides against a database of MHC peptides empirically characterized on 190 normal tissues22, removing any peptide with a parent gene represented in the normal tissue immunopeptidome. Although this last step does not absolutely exclude potential presentation of a peptide in normal tissues, it enabled us to narrow our list to 13 peptides derived from 9 genes expressed in neuroblastoma that have not been previously detected in any normal tissue.
Extended Data Table 1.
a. Annotation of CDX (cell line derived xenograft), PDX (patient derived xenograft), and high-risk primary patient tumors selected for immunopeptidomics. Age in years. Stage 4 = metastatic at diagnosis, Stage 3 = large unresectable primary tumor but no hematogenous metastases. Protein coding mutations in known neuroblastoma oncogenes. b. Peptides derived from CRC genes detected in neuroblastoma immunopeptidome. High confidence indicates spectra were detected in multiple replicates and possess high coverage across b and y ions. Spectra containing peptides from ASCL1, HAND2, and ISL1 were observed in at least one replicate and/or with partial coverage across B and Y ions, necessitating further validation to confirm presentation of peptides.
We then performed immunopeptidomics on eight high-risk diagnostic neuroblastoma primary tumours, focusing on HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-A*24:02 allotypes (Extended Data Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Using the same filtering steps as described for xenograft tumours, we identified 56 peptides (33 unique peptides derived from 29 unique proteins), with strong HLA binding affinity derived from differentially expressed genes in neuroblastoma and not previously detected in the benign tissue ligandome (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1). We confirmed the presence of 7 out of the 13 peptides from the xenografts in primary tumours, which suggested that PDX and CDX tumours can be used as predictive models for primary tumour ligandomes. Notably, the most enriched gene ontologies of the peptide parent genes not previously observed in the normal tissues ligandomic dataset were noradrenergic neuron differentiation (P = 3.42 × 10−4, FDR = 0.0389) and sympathetic nervous system development (P = 2.95 × 10−5, FDR = 0.00665; Fig. 1c, green bar). These findings highlight the distinctiveness of the neuroblastoma ligandome and suggest that MHC-presented peptides are enriched for those derived from aberrantly expressed lineage-restricted genes.
To select peptides with the highest potential as putative immunotherapeutic targets, we prioritized peptides on the basis of pMHC complex binding affinity, HLA allele frequency, degree of differential expression of parent genes, relative abundance on MHC compared with other peptides, recurrence across multiple neuroblastoma tumours and relevance to neuroblastoma biology based on the published literature23–25. One peptide each from CHRNA3, GFRA2, HMX1, IGFBPL1, PHOX2B and TH was selected for preclinical development (Fig. 1d,e and Supplementary Table 1). The presence of these peptides in tumours was validated by performing LC–MS/MS on synthetic peptides (Extended Data Fig. 2), which produced complete concordance across b and y ions. In addition, we validated peptide binding to predicted HLA alleles by refolding the pMHC complex and solving the crystal structures of one PHOX2B peptide–HLA-A*24:02 (Protein Data Bank (PDB) identifier: 7MJA) and three IGFBPL1 peptide–HLA-A*02:01 (PDB identifiers 7MJ6, 7MJ67 and 7MJ8) protein complexes (Fig. 1f and Extended Data Fig. 3b). Of note, we detected three distinct IGFBPL1 peptides as 9, 11 and 12 amino acids long (all with the same core 9 amino acids) as stable pMHC class I complexes (Extended Data Fig. 3). This result provides support for a previous study26 demonstrating that multiple peptides with distinct conformations may arise from the same region of a protein and present multiple opportunities for therapeutic targeting.
We then inferred the ability of a tumour to evade the immune response through the downregulation of target genes by examining the binding of neuroblastoma CRC transcription factors (MYCN, ASCL1, HAND2, ISL1, PHOX2B, GATA3 and TBX2; Extended Data Fig. 4a) to the parent gene locus of the prioritized antigens4. All six CRC proteins bound regulatory elements at each parent gene loci within H3K27ac super-enhancer elements (Fig. 1g and Extended Data Fig. 4b), which suggested that transcriptional redundancy and dependency should mitigate the risk of antigen loss in response to immunotherapy due to downregulation of the parent gene. In addition, peptides from each of the six CRC proteins were represented in the neuroblastoma immunopeptidome (Extended Data Table 1b). Indeed, the most significantly enriched gene groups in the immunopeptidome were nucleic acid-binding proteins (Extended Data Fig. 5c; P = 9.5 × 10−17). Finally, we interrogated the dynamics of gene expression during development using temporal transcriptomics data27. Consistent with its function in orchestrating neural crest progenitor development28, PHOX2B was expressed exclusively during fetal development and was completely silenced in normal tissues before birth (Fig. 1h), as were IGFBPL1, TH and CHRNA3 (Extended Data Fig. 6). PHOX2B is a key CRC protein that is among the most specifically expressed genes in neuroblastoma29. PHOX2B expression was not detected in normal tissue, in constrast with many solid tumour immunotherapy targets, including HER2, or chemotherapy (such as camptothecin) targets in neuroblastoma, including TOP1, each of which demonstrates significant expression in normal tissue (Fig. 1e). PHOX2B expression is routinely used in diagnostic assays for neuroblastoma30, is one of two highly penetrant susceptibility genes in this tumour31 and is the third most significant dependency in neuroblastoma as reported in DepMap32. Taken together, we suggest that PHOX2B is a highly specific tumour antigen in neuroblastoma and an ideal candidate for therapeutic targeting.
Before developing an immunotherapeutic construct that targets the PHOX2B peptide, we validated that low MHC expression in neuroblastoma16 did not prohibit T cell engagement and activation using an influenza antigen model (experimental details in Extended Data Fig. 7).
PC-CAR T cell engineering for PHOX2B
Owing to the lack of immunogenicity of self-antigens, we pursued the development of scFv-based CARs rather than engineered T cell receptors (TCRs) for PHOX2B after no high-affinity TCRs were identified in multiple screens (Extended Data Fig. 8). We reasoned that immunogenicity could be induced to otherwise immunogenically inert pMHC complexes using synthetic, peptide-centric receptors. Our first generation of pMHC-directed CARs demonstrated insignificant cross-reactivity to the MHC, which we were able to abrogate using saturation mutagenesis techniques (described in Extended Data Figs. 9–11).
To screen for PHOX2B peptide-specific clones, we adapted the Retained Display33 (ReD) system, a protein display platform that enables the flow cytometric selection of pMHC-binding scFvs in permeabilized bacterial cells, with a >1011-member scFv library. Clones that demonstrated apparent selectivity by flow cytometry were further tested against a panel of 95 unrelated peptides and 4 highly similar peptides presented on the same HLA allotype to select for clones with the highest selectivity (example of selective clone 10LH is shown in Fig. 2a). This selection step resulted in 25 scFv binders for screening in CAR T constructs. To address cross-reactivity with pMHC complexes in normal tissue, we developed an algorithm to predict potential selective cross-reactive antigen presentation (sCRAP; https://marisshiny.research.chop.edu/sCRAP/) on the same HLA allotype (Extended Data Fig. 12), which enabled pre-emptive selectivity filtering in early stages of scFv screening without the need of a previous alanine scan or receptor34. We benchmarked the sCRAP algorithm by testing its ability to predict the cross-reactivity of the MAGE-A3 peptide presented on HLA-A*01:01. The targeting of this peptide using an affinity-enhanced TCR previously resulted in fatal cross-reaction with another peptide derived from the TITIN protein presented on HLA-A*01:01 in myocardial tissue12. We predicted the cross-reactivity of MAGE-A3 with the TITIN peptide as the fourth ranked prediction out of 1,143,861 potential self-peptides presented in heart tissue (Extended Data Fig. 13).
We then screened our panel of PHOX2B-directed CARs against the top seven pMHC complexes predicted by sCRAP (Fig. 2b), which enabled us to eliminate cross-reactive CARs and to prioritize those with the highest degree of target selectivity (Fig. 2c). Out of 25 CARs screened, we selected clone 10LH, which had the highest specificity profile, for further development, showing only two peptides with >10% relative binding to 10LH compared with PHOX2B (Fig. 2d).
To test the functional significance of the binding to potential off-target pMHC complexes predicted by sCRAP, we pulsed HLA-matched, PHOX2B− SW620 colon adenocarcinoma cells with the PHOX2B peptide and potential cross-reactive peptides across a range of concentrations. Pulsing with the PHOX2B peptide resulted in cytotoxicity when cultured together with 10LH at the lowest tested concentration of 0.1 µM. 10LH CAR T cells did not induce cytotoxicity with the most cross-reactive predicted peptide ABCA8 at 10 µM, and only induced killing at the supraphysiological concentration of 50 µM. The second most cross-reactive peptide with 10LH (MYO7B) showed no CAR cytotoxicity at concentrations up to 50 µM (Fig. 2e). Neither ABCA8 nor MYO7B has been detected in the normal tissue immunopeptidome10, and none of the peptides previously detected in the normal tissue immunopeptidome displayed any cross-reactivity with PC-CAR 10LH (Fig. 2d). These screens demonstrate the utility of sCRAP to pre-emptively identify off-target effects, efficiently screen their functional consequences and identify binders with highly selective binding to tumour targets.
The lead scFv 10LH bound the PHOX2B pMHC complex with a binding affinity (Kd) of 13 nM and a slow off-rate (Fig. 2f; Kd = 7.6 × 10−4 s–1). We next performed an alanine scan for the 10LH CAR, characterizing binding to PHOX2B pMHC tetramers prepared with amino acid substitutions at each non-anchor position of the peptide34. The alanine scan revealed significant interactions of the PC-CAR receptor, with 5 out of 7 non-anchor residues of the PHOX2B peptide, including key residues protruding from the MHC cleft (interaction interface of 10LH with the PHOX2B pMHC complex mapped on crystal structures in Fig. 2h). This result highlights the improved selectivity of PC-CARs compared with the 3 or 4 residues that typically interact with the TCR35.
PC-CAR T cells can recognize peptides across HLAs
Given the prerequisite of antigen processing and presentation necessary for detection of a given MHC peptide by immunopeptidomics, we proposed that identical peptides could be presented on additional HLA allotypes capable of binding anchor residues of a peptide. Moreover, some of these peptide–HLA complexes could present a sufficiently similar molecular surface to be recognized by 10LH (Extended Data Fig. 14a). We tested this hypothesis using PHOX2B-specific CARs engineered to bind the PHOX2B 9-amino-acid-long fragment presented HLA-A*24:02 in a peptide-centric fashion. We used our population-scale antigen presentation tool ShinyNAP8 to identify additional HLA allotypes that could present the same PHOX2B peptide. The tool identified eight additional common HLAs predicted to bind the PHOX2B 9 amino acid residues (Extended Data Fig. 14b). We then used our pMHC complex structural modelling software RosettaMHC36 to model the structure of peptide complexes encompassing additional HLA alleles. The software identified HLA-A*23:01 as an additional top-scoring candidate for recognition by PC-CARs targeting the PHOX2B peptide originally discovered on HLA-A*24:02 (Fig. 3a,b). After validating stable complex formation between QYNPIRTTF and HLA-A*23:01 and HLA-C*07:02, and poor complex formation with HLA-B*14:02 by in vitro refolding with a synthetic peptide (Extended Data Fig. 14c), we measured the ability of 10LH to recognize these pMHC complexes using tetramer staining experiments. In addition to HLA-A*24:02, 10LH bound the PHOX2B 9-amino-acid-long QYNPIRTTF presented by HLA-A*23:01 (Fig. 3c). Moreover, although QYNPIRTTF formed a stable complex with HLA-C*07:02, the PHOX2B–HLA-C*07:02 tetramer did not bind 10LH CAR, which may result from presenting a distinct pMHC molecular surface in which side chains along the MHC α2-helix (R151 and Q155) protrude by 15 Å at the position axially aligned with the key 10LH binding residues of QYNPIRTTF (I5 and R6) (Fig. 3b). To demonstrate functionally relevant recognition of our prediction of PHOX2B presentation on HLA-A*23:01, we pulsed the HLA-A*23:01–PHOX2B− melanoma cell line WM873 with the QYNPIRTTF peptide. Antigen-specific killing was induced in peptide-pulsed cells, whereas no cytotoxicity was induced in cells pulsed with a mismatched peptide (Extended Data Fig. 14d). HLA-A*23:01 is the most common non-A2 allele in people of African ancestry, which highlights the potential of PC-CARs to expand clinical application to underserved populations. Finally, we reanalysed our immunopeptidomics data, performing a matched peptide analysis to identify lower confidence potential peptide matches to QYNPIRTTF in additional samples in which the peak was not fragmented. We identified m/z matches within 1 min of retention time across 6 out of 8 PDX lines and 7 out of 8 patient samples, each expressing one of the HLA alleles predicted by our analyses. This result suggests that this peptide is ubiquitously expressed in neuroblastoma (Extended Data Fig. 14f). Together, these findings warrant additional investigation into targeting tumour self-antigens and neoantigens in the context of different HLA allotypes and demonstrate the potential to significantly expand the eligible patient population receiving peptide-centric scFv-based immunotherapies.
PC-CAR T cells selectively eliminate tumours
We next tested the on-target killing potential of 10LH using available HLA-A*24:02 and HLA-A*23:01 neuroblastoma cell lines (SKNAS, NBSD and SKNFI). Complete tumour cell killing and potent IFNγ release was induced after 24 h at an effector-to-target ratio of 5:1 (Fig. 4a–c and Supplementary Video 1). We tested the functional cross-reactivity of PC-CARs against the milieu of peptides presented by off-target tissues, and no activity occurred in three HLA-A*24:02 cell lines that do not express PHOX2B (SW620, a colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line; KATO III, a gastric adenocarcinoma cell line; and HEPG2, a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line) (Fig. 4a–c, Extended Data Fig. 10b and Supplementary Video 2). To validate the specificity of PC-CAR killing, we pulsed HLA-matched, PHOX2B– cancer cell lines with the PHOX2B peptide and forcibly overexpressing PHOX2B. Specific killing occurred only in cells pulsed with the PHOX2B peptide and those transduced with full-length PHOX2B mRNA, and not in cells pulsed with a nonspecific CHRNA3, ABCA8 or MYO7B peptides presented on the same HLA, nor in cells transduced with full-length PRAME mRNA (Fig. 4b). This result demonstrates that native PHOX2B is processed and presented on MHC where it is specifically recognized by PC-CARs. To detect PHOX2B pMHC complexes on the cell surface, we generated a tetramerized 10LH scFv and stained on-target and off-target cell lines. The results showed significant surface PHOX2B pMHC in neuroblastoma cells and not in HLA-matched controls (Fig. 4f and Extended Data Fig. 15a), which suggested that these reagents have the potential to be used to assess the presence of antigen in biopsied tissue samples. Notably, CARs also flagged as cross-reactive by sCRAP demonstrated significant cross-reactivity, which validated the functional consequences of cross-reactivities predicted using our algorithm (Extended Data Fig. 15b).
We next treated immunodeficient mice engrafted with HLA-A*24:02 (SKNAS and COG-564x) and HLA-A*23:01 (NBSD) xenografts with 106 10LH and 302LH transduced CAR T cells once tumours reached 100–250 mm3. Mice treated with 10LH or 302LH PC-CARs showed complete tumour responses in both HLA-A*24:02 xenografts (Fig. 4g). However, complete responses occurred only for the 10LH-treated mice with the HLA-A*23:01 NBSD xenografts. This correlated directly with the relative affinity of these two constructs against the PHOX2B peptide presented on HLA-A*23:01 (Extended Data Fig. 14c). This result suggests that a threshold affinity or distinct mode of binding by different scFvs may contribute to the ability to recognize the peptide in slightly altered conformations when presented by different HLA alleles. We also observed that CAR treatment induced substantial upregulation of MHC in tumours. The COG-564x PDX model was generated from a post-mortem blood-draw from a patient with high-risk MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma who had suffered multiple relapses. And tumours in this mouse model show an extremely rapid growth rate. In this experiment, one mouse treated with the 10LH construct had a tumour reach the end point size of 2 cm3 just 1 week after PC-CAR T cell therapy and was available for analysis, whereas all other tumours in this group nearly reached end point size and then all regressed (Fig. 4g and Extended Data Figs. 16 and 17). The lone COG-564x and NBSD tumours that reached end point showed significant PC-CAR T cell infiltrate and substantial upregulation of MHC expression compared with end point tumours treated with non-transduced CAR T cells (Fig. 4h and Extended Data Fig. 17b). This upregulation is probably due to the high levels of IFNγ release, as measured in vitro, which suggests that these therapies can activate T cell expansion at low antigen density to initiate a feed-forward cascade that increases MHC and antigen presentation.
Discussion
Here we presented a process for identifying tumour-specific antigens derived from non-mutated oncoproteins, engineering PC-CARs against these tumour self-peptides and screening for cross-reactivity against MHC and the normal immunopeptidome. These methods resulted in PC-CARs that induced tumour cell killing across multiple HLA alleles in neuroblastoma and provide a roadmap for addressing the major challenges of therapeutic targeting of intracellular oncoproteins. These approaches demonstrate the value of pairing genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic and immunopeptidomics datasets of normal and tumour tissues for the discovery of immunotherapy targets, and the utility of the ReD system paired with sCRAP to select ultra-rare scFv clones with desired binding and specificity profiles. Targeting of non-immunogenic self-antigens through pMHC-directed PC-CARs can expand the landscape of actionable immunotherapeutic targets and enable the development of personalized immunotherapies in neuroblastoma and other cancers. Owing to the limitations in ionization and canonical search spaces of our immunopeptidomics, the prioritized peptides described here are probably a fraction of the potential pMHC complexes available for immunotherapeutic targeting. In addition, neuroblastomas in general, and especially those harbouring MYCN amplification37, have a highly immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment such that future iterations of PC-CARs may require additional engineering to enable T cells to navigate to the pMHC complex target. However, our demonstration of significant upregulation of MHC (and therefore target) in our models may help alleviate this therapeutic obstacle.
We also highlighted the utility of pairing ShinyNAP with RosettaMHC to identify HLA allotypes capable of presenting identical peptides in a similar conformation. We suggest that these tools, in addition to matched peptide searches of immunopeptidomics data across multiple tumour samples, have the potential to appreciably expand the identification of tumour-specific peptides presented on multiple HLAs. We also showed that these algorithms generate incomplete predictions and that orthogonal methods are necessary for evaluating cross-HLA presentation and targeting. The potential ability to target these antigens beyond canonical HLA restriction can significantly increase the population of patients eligible to receive each PC-CAR construct and reach underserved populations, but this will need to be verified with other PC-CARs in development. The use of the sCRAP algorithm can rapidly exclude constructs with safety liabilities and prioritize those constructs with optimal safety profiles in contrast to alanine scanning, which determines construct-specific cross-reactivities post hoc34.
We demonstrated several distinct advantages of PC-CARs to target MHC peptides compared to TCRs. PC-CARs can be used to target essential unmutated oncoproteins by inducing immunogenicity using synthetic PC receptors, opening the possibility for higher degrees of peptide specificity and targeting through multiple HLAs. PC-CARs may also have an advantage over CARs that target membrane proteins in their ability to initiate a feed-forward loop of MHC upregulation and increased antigen density. These findings build on recent studies that demonstrate the ability to target neoantigens from mutated TP53 and RAS on MHC using scFv-based approaches and further demonstrate the utility of these approaches in targeting intracellular proteins38,39. We anticipate that the methods presented herein will facilitate the discovery of tumour-specific targets in other human cancers with high unmet need and envision a library of scFv-based synthetic immunotherapies that provides wider population-scale coverage of HLA genotypes for both neoantigens and self-antigens.
Methods
Neuroblastoma samples and cell lines
Five neuroblastoma CDX and three PDX that show a range of HLA expression by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry were selected for the initial immunopeptidomics experiment (Extended Data Table 1). All had whole exome sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism array data available in addition to RNA sequencing18. Eight high-risk tumours with a mean mass of 0.56 g, ranging from 0.17 to 1.7 g, were obtained from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG; https://childrensoncologygroup.org/) with matched sequencing from Therapeutically Applicable Research To Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET; https://ocg.cancer.gov/programs/target). Informed consent from each research participant or legal guardian was obtained for each deidentified tumour and blood sample used in this study through the COG neuroblastoma biobanking study ANBL00B1.
Human-derived neuroblastoma cell lines, including SKNAS, SKNFI and NBSD, were obtained from the Maris Laboratory cell line bank. Neuroblastoma cell lines were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. Other human cancer cell lines, including Jurkat, SW620, HEPG2 and KATO III, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Jurkat cells were cultured in IMDM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. SW620 cells were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. HEPG2 cells were cultured in EMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. KATO III cells were cultured in IMDM supplemented with 20% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. Packaging cell lines, including platinum-A cells and HEK293T cells were obtained from Cell BioLabs and ATCC, respectively. Both packaging cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine. All cell lines were grown under humidified conditions in 5% CO2 at 37 °C, and samples were regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination.
Primary human T cells
Primary human T cells were obtained from anonymous donors through the Human Immunology Core at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) under a protocol approved by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Institutional Review Board. Cells were cultured using AIM-V (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U ml–1 penicillin, 100 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 2 mM l-glutamine under humidified conditions in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. T cell donors provided informed consent through the University of Pennsylvania Immunology Core.
Isolation of HLA ligands by immunoaffinity purification
HLA class I molecules were isolated using standard immunoaffinity purification methods as previously described1,2. In brief, cell pellets were lysed in 10 mM CHAPS/PBS (AppliChem/Lonza) containing 1× protease inhibitor (Complete; Roche). Mouse MHC molecules were removed using a 1 h immunoaffinity purification method with H-2K-specific monoclonal antibody 20-8-4S, covalently linked to CNBr-activated sepharose (GE Healthcare). Remaining HLA molecules were purified overnight using the pan-HLA class I-specific monoclonal antibody W6/32 or a mix of the pan-HLA class-II-specific monoclonal antibody Tü39 and the HLA-DR-specific monoclonal antibody L243, covalently linked to CNBr-activated. pMHC complexes were eluted by the repeated addition of 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid (Merck). Elution fractions E1–E4 were pooled, and free MHC ligands were isolated by ultrafiltration using centrifugal filter units (Amicon, Merck Millipore). MHC ligands were extracted and desalted from the filtrate using ZipTip C18 pipette tips (Merck Millipore). Extracted peptides were eluted in 35 µl acetonitrile (Merck)/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, centrifuged to complete dryness and resuspended in 25 µl 1% acetonitrile/0.05% trifluoroacetic acid. Samples were stored at −20 °C until analysis by LC–MS/MS.
Analysis of HLA ligands by LC–MS/MS
Peptide samples were separated by reverse-phase LC (nanoUHPLC, UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano, Dionex) and subsequently analysed in an online coupled Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were analysed in three technical replicates. Sample volumes of 5 µl (sample shares of 20%) were injected onto a 75 µm × 2 cm trapping column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC, Dionex) at 4 µl min–1 for 5.75 min. Peptide separation was subsequently performed at 50 °C and a flow rate of 300 nl min–1 on a 50 µm × 25 cm separation column (Acclaim PepMap RSLC, Dionex), applying a gradient ranging from 2.4 to 32.0% acetonitrile over the course of 90 min. Eluting peptides were ionized by nanospray ionization and analysed in a mass spectrometer implementing the TopSpeed method. Survey scans were generated in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 120,000. Precursor ions were isolated in quadrupole, fragmented by collision induced dissociation (CID) in the dual-pressure linear ion trap for MHC class I-purified peptides. Finally, fragment ions were recorded in the Orbitrap. An AGC target of 1.5 × 105 and a maximum injection time of 50 ms was used for MS1. An AGC target of 7 × 104 and a maximum injection time of 150 ms was used for MS2. The collision energy for CID fragmentation was 35%. For fragmentation, mass ranges were limited to 400–650 m/z with charge states 2+ and 3+ for MHC class I.
Synthetic peptides were analysed using a 30-min gradient owing to the simplicity of the sample. Full scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with a scan range of 300–1,200 at 120,000 resolution. The AGC target was 5.0 × 105 with a maximum injection time of 50 ms. Precursor ions were isolated in quadrupole, fragmented (CID, HCD and ETD) and analysed in the Orbitrap. MS2 were also acquired in the Orbitrap with 30,000 resolution, collision energy of 35%, AGC of 5 × 104 and maximum injection time of 150 ms. As the discovery analysis was completed using CID, synthetic peptides fragmented with CID were compared for validation.
The MS proteomics data have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange Consortium through the PRIDE40 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD027182.
HLA typing
FASTQ files from TARGET DNA and RNA sequencing data from cell lines were processed using the PHLAT algorithm, as previously validated on 15 HLA alleles8.
Database search and spectral annotation
Data were processed against the human proteome per the Swiss-Prot database (https://www.uniprot.org, release 27 May 2021; 20,395 reviewed protein sequences contained) using the SequestHT algorithm41 in Proteome Discoverer (v.2.1; Thermo Fisher Scientific) software. Precursor mass tolerance was set to 5 ppm and the fragment mass tolerance to 0.02 Da. The search was not restricted to an enzymatic specificity. Oxidized methionine was allowed as a dynamic modification. FDR was determined using the Percolator algorithm based on processing against a decoy database consisting of shuffled sequences. FDR was set to 1%. Peptide lengths were limited to 8–14 amino acids for MHC class I. HLA annotation was performed using NetMHC-4.0 for HLA class I. For peptide matching, data were reprocessed using Proteome Discoverer (v.2.4; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the same parameters but with the addition of the feature mapper node to allow peptide matching between samples. Synthetic peptides were searched using a similar approach, but Percolator was replaced with the fixed value PSM validator owing to the simplicity of the synthetic peptide sample. Gene ontology analyses were performed using PANTHER42 (http://geneontology.org/), and P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test.
HLA binding predictions
HLA binding predictions were performed using NetMHC (v.4.0)43, NetMHCpan (v.4.1)44 and HLAthena45 on HLA class I.
scFv biopanning and CAR design
scFv binders against MHC-presented peptides were retrieved from a large (2 × 1010) naive phage display scFv library46. A competitive panning process was developed to identify specific binders targeting the pMHC complex based on previous protocols47. Biotinylated pMHC monomers (target antigens) and non-biotinylated tetramers (decoy competitors) were obtained from the NIH tetramer core facility. A total of 1012 copies of phages were depleted against magnetic beads (Invitrogen Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin T1) for 30 min before incubation for 1.5 h with 5 µg biotinylated pMHC-conjugated beads in the presence of 20 µg irrelevant decoy competitors. After incubation, the beads were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST buffer) 5 times followed by 2 PBS washes. The remaining bound phage were recovered by log-phase TG1 and rescued using the M13KO7 helper phage. The amplified phage was collected the next day by PEG–NaCl precipitation and used for the next round of panning. The target antigen input was decreased from 5 µg for the first round of panning to 2 µg and 0.5 µg for the second and third rounds, respectively, and the washing conditions were more stringent along with the panning rounds. After three rounds of panning, polyclonal phage ELISA was performed to evaluate enrichment. TG1 cells from the second and third rounds were randomly spotted into 96-well plates for soluble expression-based monoclonal ELISA as previously described47,48. Clones producing signals binding to target antigens but not the decoy competitors were amplified and sequenced. For protein preparation, these clones were transformed into HB2151 cells for expression, and proteins were purified by one-step Ni-NTA resin. Protein purity and homogeneity were analysed by SDS–PAGE. Protein concentration was measured spectrophotometrically (NanoVue, GE Healthcare). Second-generation CAR constructs were synthesized using scFv sequences with 4-1BB and CD3ζ co-stimulatory domains and cloned into a pMP71 vector for screening.
ReD library panning
The Ruby scFv library (>1011 diversity) was constructed using fully germline IGLV3-1 and IGLV6-57 scaffolds paired with the IGHV3-23 scaffold, as previously described33, with fully synthetic amino acid diversity in both VL and VH CDR3 loops.
The Ruby library was panned for two rounds using PHOX2B(43–51)–MHC complex bound to MyOne Streptavidin C1 Dynabeads (Thermo Fisher, 65002). Panned library outputs were transferred into the ReD cell-display platform33 and cells were permeabilized using 0.5% n-octyl β-d-thioglucopyranoside (Anatrace, 0314) and labelled using recombinant PHOX2B pMHC complex ligated to fluorophores excitable by 405 nm and 488 nm lasers. Cells that were positive for target binding were isolated using a FACSMelody sorter (Becton-Dickinson).
After two rounds of positive selection for binding to the PHOX2B–MHC complex, two further FACS rounds were conducted using counter-labelled A*24:02–MHC complexes with unrelated peptides. After four rounds of FACS, individual colonies were picked and grown in 96-well plates before scFv induction, cell permeabilization and PHOX2B–MHC labelling and detection by CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter).
Clones that were identified as binding specifically to the PHOX2B(43–51)–MHC complex were sequenced, and unique scFvs were expressed as fusions to the AviTag biotinylation motif in Escherichia coli. Biotinylated scFv protein was released through permeabilization with 0.5% n-octyl β-d-thioglucopyranoside and purified to about 90% purity on Nickel NTA agarose resin (ABT, 6BCL-NTANi).
Binding kinetics
Affinity measurements were performed using a BLItz system (ForteBio) and analysed using BLItz Pro software. Streptavidin biosensors (ForteBio, 18–5019) were loaded with AviTag-biotinylated scFv, blocked with biotin, washed in PBS and then associated with pMHC ligand in PBS.
Steady-state binding assay
An equilibrium binding assay to target pMHC complexes was also established using MyOne Streptavidin C1 Dynabeads. In brief, 50 µg of Streptavidin C1 Dynabeads were incubated with excess biotinylated scFv before being blocked with free biotin and washed in PBS. Fluorophore-labelled pMHC complex was added to a concentration of 3.5 nM and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C followed by 10 min at 25 °C. Binding of the free MHC complex to the beads was quantitated using CytoFLEX at 488 nm (excitation) and 525 nm (emission). Binding was normalized to beads without scFv and with unrelated control MHC complex.
This bead-binding assay was used to quantitate the binding of scFv to MHC complexes with alanine-scan substitutions of the PHOX2B peptides and to a plate of 95 unrelated 9-amino-acid peptide A*24:02–MHC complexes. The degree of cross-reactivity of binding of MHC complexes with peptides identified as having high homology to the PHOX2B peptide was analysed using eXpitope 2.0.
Viral production and transduction of Jurkat and primary T cells
Retrovirus for transduction of Jurkat cells and primary CD4/8T cells was produced using platinum-A cells, a retroviral packaging cell line. Cells were plated in 6-well plates at 7 × 105 cells per well and transfected with 2.5 µg of the appropriate TCR or CAR construct in the retroviral vector pMP71 using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies, Invitrogen). After 24 h, medium was replaced with IMDM-10% FBS or AIM-V-10% FBS for Jurkat cells or primary cells, respectively. Supernatants were collected and filtered through 0.2 μm filters after 24 h of incubation.
A second-generation lentiviral system was used to produce replication-deficient lentivirus. The day preceding transfection, 15 million HEK293T cells were plated in a 15-cm dish. On the day of transfection, 80 µl Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies, Invitrogen) was added to 3.5 ml room-temperature Opti-MEM medium (Gibco). Concurrently, 80 µl P3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 12 µg psPAX2 (Gag/Pol), 6.5 µg pMD2.6 (VSV-G envelope) and a matching molar quantity of transfer plasmid were added to 3.5 ml room-temperature Opti-MEM medium. Virus supernatant was collected after 24 and 48 h and briefly centrifuged at 300g and passed through a 0.45 µm syringe.
Jurkat cells were plated in 6-well plates pre-treated with 1 ml well/retronectin (20 mg ml–1, Takara) at 1 × 106 cells per well and spinoculated with 2 ml retroviral supernatant at 800g for 30 min at room temperature. After 24 h, cells were collected and grown in IMDM with 10% FBS.
Primary T cells were thawed and activated in culture for 3 days in the presence of 100 U ml–1 IL-2 and anti-CD3/CD28 beads (Dynabeads, Human T-Activator CD3/CD28, Life Technologies) at a 3:1 bead:T cell ratio. On days 4 and 5, activated cells were plated in 6-well plates pre-treated with 1 ml well/retronectin (20 mg ml–1, Takara) at 1 × 106 cells per well and spinoculated with 2 ml retroviral supernatant at 2,400 r.p.m. for 2 h at 32 °C. On day 6, cells were collected and washed, beads were magnetically removed, and cells were expanded in AIM-V and 10% FBS supplemented with 25 U ml–1 IL-2.
Primary human T cells were thawed and activated in culture for 1 day in the presence of 5 ng ml–1 recombinant IL-7, 5 ng ml–1 recombinant IL-15 and anti-CD3/CD28 beads (Dynabeads, Human T-Activator CD3/CD28, Life Technologies) at a 3:1 bead:T cell ratio in G-Rex system vessels (Wilson Wolf). On day 2, thawed lentiviral vector was added to cultured T cells with 10 µg ml–1 polybrene (Millipore Sigma), and 24 h later, vessels were filled with complete AIM-V medium supplemented with indicated concentrations of IL-7 and IL-15. On day 10, cells were collected and washed. Activation beads were magnetically removed, and cell viability was determined before freezing.
Human neuroblastoma cell lines were plated in 6-cm dishes, and 2 ml of thawed lentiviral vector produced with transfer plasmid pLenti-CMV-eGFP-Puro (Addgene, plasmid 17448) was added with 10 µg ml–1polybrene (Millipore Sigma). Cells were selected for eGFP expression using flow-assisted cell sorting (BD FACSJazz, BD Biosciences) followed by 10 µg ml–1 puromycin selection.
sCRAP prediction
Tumour antigens were compared against the entire normal human proteome on the matched HLA (85,915,364 total normal peptides among HLA 84 HLAs). Each residue in the same position of the tumour and human peptides was assigned a score for perfect match, similar amino acid classification or different polarity, scoring 5, 2 or –2, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 12). Similarity scores were calculated based on amino acid classification and hydrophobicity was determined using residues one and three until eight and excluding MHC anchor residues. Next, the maximum normal tissue RPKM values were identified from 1,643 normal tissues in GTEx. Normal peptides were compared with a database of normal tissue immunopeptidomes49. The overall cross-reactivity score for each normal peptide was then calculated using the following equation:
where n is the peptide length, P is the score of each amino acid of the normal peptide compared to the tumour antigen, b is the pMHC binding affinity of the normal peptide, and Emax is the maximum normal tissue expression. The algorithm is available at https://marisshiny.research.chop.edu/sCRAP.
Tetramer and dextramer staining and flow cytometric analysis
Surface expression and binding of TCR-transduced and CAR-transduced Jurkat cells and primary T cells was measured by staining with PE-conjugated or APC-conjugated dextramers carrying NB antigen pMHC (Immudex). Cells were collected from culture, washed with 2 ml PBS at 800g for 5 min, incubated with 1 µl dextramer for 10 min in the dark, washed again and resuspended in 300 µl PBS for analysis. Typically, 5 × 105 cells were used for staining and analysed on a BD LSR II (BD Biosciences) or an Attune Acoustic Focusing cytometer (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies). Flow cytometry data were collected using CytExpert (Beckman Coulter) and FACSDiva (BD Biosciences). The gating strategy for all tetramer and dextramer staining is shown in Extended Data Fig. 9f.
Cross-reactivity pMHC screen
Potential cross-reactive peptides (GenScript) were suspended at a 200 µM working concentration. For each test, 0.5 µl of peptide was added to 5 µl HLA-A*24:02 empty loadable tetramer (Tetramer Shop) before incubating on ice for 30 min or using TAPBR peptide exchange as previously described50. Following preparation, pMHC tetramers were used to stain cells (described above). CAR construct cross-reactivity values were determined using Jurkat cells transduced with CAR clones followed by staining with HLA-A*24:02 tetramers loaded with cross-reactive peptides. Mean fluorescent intensity was compared across peptides to determine cross-reactivity.
Antigen-specific CD8 T cell enrichment and expansion
Normal donor monocytes were plated on day 1 in 6-well plates at 5 × 106 per well in RPMI-10 FBS supplemented with 10 ng ml–1 IL-4 (Peprotech) and 800 IU ml–1 GM-CSF (Peprotech) and incubated at 37 °C overnight. On day 2, fresh medium supplemented with 10 ng ml–1 IL-4 and 1,600 IU ml–1 GM-CSF was added to the monocytes and incubated at 37 °C for another 48 h. On day 4, non-adherent cells were removed, and immature dendritic cells washed and pulsed with 5 µM peptide in AIM-V-10% FBS supplemented with 10 ng ml–1 IL-4, 800 IU ml–1 GM-CSF, 10 ng ml–1 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 IU ml–1 IFNγ (Peprotech) at 37 °C overnight. Day 1 was repeated on days 4 and 8 to generate dendritic cells for the second and third stimulations on days 8 and 12, respectively.
On day 5, normal donor-matched CD8+ T cells were enriched using the protein kinase inhibitor dasatinib (Sigma-Aldrich), dextramers and anti-PE or anti-APC beads (Miltenyi Biotec) as previously described51. Enriched T cells were co-incubated with the appropriate pulsed dendritic cells in AIM-V-10% FBS. Day 5 protocol was repeated on day 8 and day 12 using dendritic cells generated on days 4 and 8 for the second and third stimulation, respectively. Expanded T cells were validated for antigen-specificity by staining with the appropriate dextramers and for activation marker 41BB/CD137 (BioLegend).
Antigen-specific T cell sorting, sequencing and cloning
Expanded T cells were stained with CD3, CD8, CD14, CD19, live/dead, and matched and mismatched dextramer, and single-antigen-specific T cells were sorted using a FACSAria Fusion (BD Biosciences).
Sorted cells were loaded onto 10x Genomics 5′ V(D)J chips and libraries prepared according to manufacturer’s protocols. TCRα/β amplicons were run on MiSeq using 5,000 reads per cell. Sequencing data were processed using Cell Ranger and analysed using Loupe VDJ Browser. TCRα and β chains were codon optimized and synthesized into bicistronic expression cassettes using engineered cysteine residues in the TCR constant domains, using F2A ribosomal skip sites and furin cleavage sites52. TCR cassettes were cloned into pMP71 retroviral vector.
Incucyte cytotoxicity assay
A total of 0.5 × 105 tumour cell targets were incubated with varying ratios of transduced primary cells (5 × 105, 2.5 × 105, 1 × 105, 0.5 × 105 and 2.5 × 104 for 10:1, 5:1, 2:1, 1:1 and 1:2 effector-to-target ratios, respectively) in 96-well plates at 37 °C in the presence of 0.05 µM caspase-3/7 red (Incucyte, Essence BioScience). Plates were run on an Incucyte Zoom or S3 for 24–72 h and measured for apoptosis activity through caspase cleavage and comparison of relative confluency. Following the assay, supernatants were collected for ELISA. Total GFP integrated intensity (total GCU × μm2 per image) was assessed as a quantitative measure of live, GFP+ tumour cells. Values were normalized to the t = 0 measurement.
Cytokine secretion assays
Cell supernatant collected from cell cytotoxicity assays was thawed and plated in triplicate for each condition. IFNγ and IL-2 levels were determined using ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BioLegend).
Antigen processing and presentation
Neuroblastoma cell lines were titrated with H1N5 influenza virus and infectivity was measured by flow cytometry using virus nucleoprotein (NP) antibody. HLA-A2 neuroblastoma cell lines were cultured with either 5 μM CEF1 or 50 HAU of H1N5 virus then cultured with M1 antigen-specific T cell hybridoma provided by D. Canaday53. T cell activation was measured using IL-2 ELISA (Abcam).
Expression, refolding and purification of recombinant pHLA molecules
HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*24:02:01, HLA-A*23:01, HLA-B*14:02 and HLA-C*07:02 constructs for bacterial expression were cloned into pET24a+ plasmids. DNA plasmids encoding HLA heavy chain and human β2M (light chain) were transformed into E. coli BL21-DE3 (Novagen), expressed as inclusion bodies and refolded using previously described methods54. E. coli cells were grown in autoinduction medium for (16–18 h)55. Afterwards, the E. coli cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended with 25 ml BugBuster (Milipore Sigma) per litre of culture. The cell lysate was sonicated and subsequently pelleted by centrifugation (5,180g for 20 min at 4 °C) to collect inclusion bodies. The inclusion bodies were washed with 25 ml of wash buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA and 0.01% v/v deoxycholate), sonicated and pelleted by centrifugation. A second wash was done using 25 ml Tris-EDTA buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.0 and 2 mM EDTA). The solution was once again resuspended by sonication then centrifuged. The inclusion bodies were then solubilized by resuspending in 6 ml of resuspension buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT and 6 M guanidine-HCl). Solubilized inclusion bodies of the heavy and light chain were mixed in a 1:3 molar ratio and then added dropwise over 2 days to 1 litre of refolding buffer (100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA, 0.4 M arginine-HCl, 4.9 mM l-glutathione reduced, and 0.57 mM l-glutathione oxidized) containing 10 mg of synthetic peptide at >98% purity confirmed by MS (Genscript). Refolding was allowed to proceed for 4 days at 4 °C without stirring. Following this incubation period, the refolding mixture was dialysed into size-exclusion buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8.0 and 150 mM NaCl). After dialysis, the sample was concentrated first using a Labscale Tangential Flow Filtration system and then using an Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal 10 kDa MWCO Filter Unit (Millipore Sigma) to a final volume of 5 ml. Purification was performed using size-exclusion chromatography on a HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 75 column. The purified protein was exhaustively exchanged into 20 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.2 and 50 mM NaCl. The final sample was validated using SDS–PAGE to confirm the formation of a pMHC complex containing both the heavy and light chains.
Differential scanning fluorimetry
To measure the thermal stability of the pMHC class I molecules, 2.5 μM protein was mixed with 10× Sypro Orange dye in matched buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.2, 100 mM NaCl) in MicroAmp Fast 96well plates (Applied Biosystems) at a final volume of 50 μl. Differential scanning fluorimetry was performed using an Applied Biosystems ViiA qPCR machine with excitation and emission wavelengths at 470 nm and 569 nm, respectively. Thermal stability was measured by increasing the temperature from 25 °C to 95 °C at a scan rate of 1 °C min–1. Melting temperatures (Tm) were calculated in GraphPad Prism 7 by plotting the first derivative of each melt curve and taking the peak as the Tm.
Protein crystallization
Purified HLA-A*02:01–LLLPLLPPL, HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSP, HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSPS, HLA-A*02:01–LLPRLPPL and HLA-A*24:02–QYNPIRTTF complexes were used for crystallization. Proteins were concentrated to 10–12 mg ml–1 in 50 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris pH 8.0, and crystal trays were set up using a 1:1 protein-to-buffer ratio at room temperature. Optimal crystals for HLA-A*02:01–LLLPLLPPL, HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSP and HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSPS were obtained with 1 M sodium citrate dibasic and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate pH 6.5. For HLA-A*02:01–LLPRLPPL, diffracting crystals were obtained with 0.2 M magnesium chloride, 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.0 and 20% PEG 6000. HLA-A*24:02–QYNPIRTTF diffracting crystals were obtained with 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.0 and 10% PEG 6000. Diffraction-quality crystals were collected and incubated from the above conditions plus glycerol as a cryoprotectant and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen before data collection. All crystals used in this study were grown using the hanging drop vapour diffusion method. Data were collected from single crystals under cryogenic conditions at Advanced Light Source (beam lines 8.3.1 and 5.0.1). Diffraction images were indexed, integrated and scaled using MOSFLM and Scala in CCP4 Package56. Structures were determined by Phaser57 using previously published structures of HLA-A*02:01 (PDB identifier 5C07)58 and HLA-A*24:02 (PDB identifier 3VXN)59. Model building and refinement were performed using COOT60 and Phenix61, respectively.
Homology modelling of pHLA complexes using RosettaMHC
Three-dimensional structural models of HLA-A*23:01 and HLA-C*07:02 bound to the peptide QYNPIRTTF were generated using RosettaMHC, an in-house method for modelling the α1/α2 peptide binding domains of pMHC class I molecules36. In brief, the amino acid sequences of HLA-A*23:01 and HLA-C*07:02 were first obtained from the IPD-IMGT/HLA Database62. The sequence of HLA alleles of interest was aligned against the sequences of 318 HLA curated template structures available in RosettaMHC. For each allele, all candidate templates were selected according to a 70% sequence identity criterion between aligned residues within the peptide-binding groove (within 3.5 Å of any peptide heavy atom). Generation of 3D models was performed using a Monte Carlo sampling of sidechain rotamer conformations, followed by gradient-based optimization of all backbone and side chain degrees of freedom. For each pHLA complex, the top five models with the lowest Rosetta binding energy were selected as the final structural ensemble. The quality of the final models was assessed using the Molprobity webserver63. Analysis of polar contacts and surface area were performed using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System (v.2.4.1).
Immunohistochemistry
CD3 (Dako A0452), PHOX2B (Abcam ab183741) and HLA-ABC (Abcam ab70328) antibodies were used to stain formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue slides. Staining was performed on a Bond Max automated staining system (Leica Biosystems). A Bond Refine polymer staining kit (Leica Biosystems, DS9800) was used. The standard protocol was followed with the exception of the primary antibody incubation, which was extended to 1 h at room temperature. CD3, PHOX2B and HLA-ABC antibodies were used at 1:100, 1:500 and 1:1,200 dilutions, respectively. Antigen retrieval was performed with E1 (Leica Biosystems) retrieval solution for 20 min (E2 for PHOX2B). Slides were rinsed, dehydrated through a series of ascending concentrations of ethanol and xylene, then coverslipped. Stained slides were then digitally scanned at ×20 magnification on an Aperio CS-O slide scanner (Leica Biosystems).
Mouse PC-CAR T cell preclinical trials
NOD SCID Gamma (NSG) female (6–8 weeks of age) mice from Jackson Laboratory (stock number 005557) were used to propagate subcutaneous xenografts. All mice were maintained under barrier conditions and experiments were conducted using protocols and conditions approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Treatment was initiated through lateral tail intravenous injection. The dose administered was 100 µl per animal of vehicle or CAR T cells as a single treatment. Treatment was administered at weeks 8–10 when tumour volumes reached 150–250 mm3. Six mice were enrolled per group based on previous experience and randomized based on tumour size. The mouse technician was blinded to T cell engineering. Tumour volume and survival were monitored through bi-weekly measurements until the tumours reached a size of 2.0 cm3 or mice showed signs of graft versus host disease (GVHD). Animals were removed from study and studies terminated following onset of GVHD when animals display hunched posture, rapid breathing, urine staining, weight loss and a body condition score of 2, as determined by visual inspection. Onset of GVHD defined as urine staining and weight loss of 20% or weight loss of 10–15% if accompanied by hunched posture, laboured breathing or poor body condition.
Statistics and reproducibility
Box and whisker plot representations of data show the median as centre, 25th percentile and 75th percentile as bounds of boxes for plots shown in Fig. 1e and Extended Data Figs. 1 and 13b.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06706-0.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a St Baldrick’s Foundation-Stand Up to Cancer Dream Team Translational Research Grant (SU2C-AACR-DT-27-17). The St Baldrick’s Foundation collaborates with Stand Up To Cancer. Research Grants are administered by the American Association for Cancer Research, the Scientific Partner of SU2C. Stand Up To Cancer is a programme of the Entertainment Industry Foundation administered by the American Association for Cancer Research (J.M.M.). This work was also supported by NIH grants U54 CA232568 as part of the Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot Program (J.M.M.) and NIH R35 CA220500 (J.M.M.), R01 AI143997 (N.G.S.), R35 GM125034 (N.G.S.), the Science Center Quod Erat Demonstrandum (QED) programme at the Philadelphia Science Center (J.M.M. and M.Y.), the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Cell and Gene Therapy Collaborative (J.M.M., M.Y.), and the Giulio D’Angio Endowed Chair (J.M.M.). Diffraction data for protein crystallography were collected at the Advanced Light Source, which is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and the US Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. We thank D. Canaday, A. Wolpaw, E. Hooijberg and H. Goldstein for providing reagents, and M. Young (CHOP) for performing additional protein refolding and differential scanning fluorimetry experiments. Fig. 1a,d and Extended Data Figs. 7a, 11b, 12a,c and 14a were created using BioRender (https://www.biorender.com).
Extended data figures and tables
Author contributions
Conceptualization: M.Y. Methodology: M.Y., Q.F.M., J.M.W., H.S., T.N., E.R., M.d.M., D.M., K.R.B., H.T., L.E., S.T., S.N., A.W., R.W., M.C., D.M., S.S. and D.G. Immunopeptidomics: M.Y. and M.d.M. scFv screening: R.P., N.L.C., W.L., D.S.D. and B.R.K. Algorithm development: M.Y., N.G.S. and A.F. X-ray crystallography: J.S.T., S.T. and M.Y. Structural modelling: H.T. and M.Y. Analyses: M.Y., Q.F.M., H.T., N.K. and J.M.M. Investigation: M.Y. and J.M.M. Funding acquisition: M.Y., N.G.S. and J.M.M. Writing: M.Y. and J.M.M. Supervision: M.Y. and J.M.M.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Lélia Delamarre, Naomi Taylor and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
Neuroblastoma HLA class I immunopeptidomics data are available through PRIDE (accession PXD027182). Sample files are annotated in Supplementary Table 2. All proteins structures are available in the PDB under accession codes 7MJ6 (HLA-A*02:01–LLLPLLPPL), 7MJ7 (HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSP), 7MJ8 (HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSPS), 7MJ9 (HLA-A*02:01/LLPRLPPL) and 7MJA (HLA-A*24:02–QYNPIRTTF). The sCRAP algorithm is accessible to the scientific community through a web portal (https://marisshiny.research.chop.edu/sCRAP/). All other data are available within the article and supplementary information files or by request from the corresponding author.
Competing interests
J.M.M. and M.Y. have equity stake in Tantigen Bio and HuLA Therapeutics. Both companies have interest in commercializing technologies described herein. B.R.K. is an employee of and has equity interests in Myrio Therapeutics. R.P. and N.L.C. are employees of Myrio Therapeutics. J.M.M., M.Y., N.G.S. and B.R.K. are co-inventors on a patent filed regarding the PHOX2B PC-CAR.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Mark Yarmarkovich, Email: mark.yarmarkovich@nyulangone.org.
John M. Maris, Email: maris@chop.edu
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-023-06706-0.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06706-0.
References
- 1.Pearlman AH, et al. Targeting public neoantigens for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Cancer. 2021;2:487–497. doi: 10.1038/s43018-021-00210-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alexandrov LB, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–421. doi: 10.1038/nature12477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leko V, Rosenberg SA. Identifying and targeting human tumor antigens for T cell-based immunotherapy of solid tumors. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:454–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Durbin AD, et al. Selective gene dependencies in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma include the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry. Nat. Genet. 2018;50:1240–1246. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0191-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Majzner RG, Mackall CL. Clinical lessons learned from the first leg of the CAR T cell journey. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1341–1355. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0564-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tsherniak A, et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell. 2017;170:564–576.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yossef R, et al. Enhanced detection of neoantigen-reactive T cells targeting unique and shared oncogenes for personalized cancer immunotherapy. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e122467. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.122467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yarmarkovich, M. et al. Immunogenicity and immune silence in human cancer. Front. Immunol.10.3389/fimmu.2020.00069 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science. 2015;348:69–74. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shao W, et al. The SysteMHC Atlas project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1237–D1247. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maus, M. V. et al. An MHC-restricted antibody-based chimeric antigen receptor requires TCR-like affinity to maintain antigen specificity. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics10.1038/mto.2016.23 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Linette GP, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity and titin cross-reactivity of affinity-enhanced T cells in myeloma and melanoma. Blood. 2013;122:863–871. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morgan RA, et al. Cancer regression and neurological toxicity following anti-MAGE-A3 TCR gene therapy. J. Immunother. 2013;36:133–151. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182829903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matthay KK, et al. Neuroblastoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016;2:16078. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pugh TJ, et al. The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:279–284. doi: 10.1038/ng.2529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Burr ML, et al. An evolutionarily conserved function of polycomb silences the MHC class I antigen presentation pathway and enables immune evasion in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:385–401.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.The GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science369, 1318–1330 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Rokita JL, et al. Genomic profiling of childhood tumor patient-derived xenograft models to enable rational clinical trial design. Cell Rep. 2019;29:1675–1689.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kowalewski DJ, Stevanović S. Biochemical large-scale identification of MHC class I ligands. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;960:145–157. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-218-6_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bassani-Sternberg M, et al. Direct identification of clinically relevant neoepitopes presented on native human melanoma tissue by mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13404. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ma X, et al. Pan-cancer genome and transcriptome analyses of 1,699 paediatric leukaemias and solid tumours. Nature. 2018;555:371–376. doi: 10.1038/nature25795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freudenmann LK, Marcu A, Stevanović S. Mapping the tumour human leukocyte antigen (HLA) ligandome by mass spectrometry. Immunology. 2018;154:331–345. doi: 10.1111/imm.12936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Raabe EH, et al. Prevalence and functional consequence of PHOX2B mutations in neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 2007;27:469. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee NH, et al. Clinical significance of tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA transcripts in peripheral blood at diagnosis in patients with neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;48:1399–1407. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marachelian A, et al. Expression of five neuroblastoma genes in bone marrow or blood of patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma provides a new biomarker for disease and prognosis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:5374–5383. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Toor, J. S. et al. A Recurrent mutation in anaplastic lymphoma kinase with distinct neoepitope conformations. Front. Immunol.10.3389/fimmu.2018.00099 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Cardoso-Moreira M, et al. Gene expression across mammalian organ development. Nature. 2019;571:505–509. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1338-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pattyn A, Morin X, Cremer H, Goridis C, Brunet J-F. The homeobox gene Phox2b is essential for the development of autonomic neural crest derivatives. Nature. 1999;399:366–370. doi: 10.1038/20700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang L, et al. ASCL1 is a MYCN- and LMO1-dependent member of the adrenergic neuroblastoma core regulatory circuitry. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5622. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13515-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hata JL, et al. Diagnostic utility of PHOX2B in primary and treated neuroblastoma and in neuroblastoma metastatic to the bone marrow. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2015;139:543–546. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0255-OA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mosse YP, et al. Germline PHOX2B mutation in hereditary neuroblastoma. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;75:727–730. doi: 10.1086/424530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dharia NV, et al. A first-generation pediatric cancer dependency map. Nat. Genet. 2021;53:529–538. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00819-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Beasley MD, Niven KP, Winnall WR, Kiefel BR. Bacterial cytoplasmic display platform Retained Display (ReD) identifies stable human germline antibody frameworks. Biotechnol. J. 2015;10:783–789. doi: 10.1002/biot.201400560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kunert A, Obenaus M, Lamers CHJ, Blankenstein T, Debets R. T-cell receptors for clinical therapy: in vitro assessment of toxicity risk. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:6012–6020. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rudolph MG, Stanfield RL, Wilson IA. How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006;24:419–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nerli, S. & Sgourakis, N. G. Structure-based modeling of SARS-CoV-2 peptide/HLA-A02 antigens. Front. Med. Technol.10.3389/fmedt.2020.553478 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Asgharzadeh S, et al. Clinical significance of tumor-associated inflammatory cells in metastatic neuroblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:3525–3532. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.9169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Douglass J, et al. Bispecific antibodies targeting mutant RAS neoantigens. Sci. Immunol. 2021;6:eabd5515. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd5515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hsiue, E. H.-C. et al. Targeting a neoantigen derived from a common TP53 mutation. Science10.1126/science.abc8697 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D442–d450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tabb, D.L. The SEQUEST family tree. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.26, 1814–1819 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D, Huang X, Thomas PD. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D419–d426. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nielsen M, et al. Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Sci. 2003;12:1007–1017. doi: 10.1110/ps.0239403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reynisson B, Alvarez B, Paul S, Peters B, Nielsen M. NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:W449–w454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sarkizova S, et al. A large peptidome dataset improves HLA class I epitope prediction across most of the human population. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020;38:199–209. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhu, Z. & Dimitrov, D. S. Construction of a large naïve human phage-displayed Fab library through one-step cloning. In Therapeutic Antibodies (ed. Dimitrov, A.) 129–142 (Humana, 2009); 10.1007/978-1-59745-554-1_6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Zhang, M. Y. & Dimitrov, D. S. Sequential antigen panning for selection of broadly cross-reactive HIV-1-neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies. In Antibody Phage Display (ed. Aitken, R.) 143–154 (Humana, 2009); 10.1007/978-1-60327-302-2_11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Chen, W., Xiao, X., Wang, Y., Zhu, Z. & Dimitrov, D. S. Bifunctional fusion proteins of the human engineered antibody domain m36 with human soluble CD4 are potent inhibitors of diverse HIV-1 isolates. Antiviral Res.88, 107–115 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Shao, W., Caron, E., Pedrioli, P. & Aebersold, R. in Bioinformatics for Cancer Immunotherapy: Methods and Protocols (ed. Boegel, S.) 173–181 (Springer, 2020).
- 50.Overall SA, et al. High throughput pMHC-I tetramer library production using chaperone-mediated peptide exchange. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1909. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15710-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dolton G, et al. Optimized peptide–MHC multimer protocols for detection and isolation of autoimmune T-cells. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1378–1378. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yang, S. et al. Development of optimal bicistronic lentiviral vectors facilitates high-level TCR gene expression and robust tumor cell recognition. Gene Ther.15, 1411–1423 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Canaday DH. Production of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell hybridomas. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;960:297–307. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-218-6_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Garboczi DN, Hung DT, Wiley DC. HLA-A2–peptide complexes: refolding and crystallization of molecules expressed in Escherichia coli and complexed with single antigenic peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:3429–3433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Studier FW. Stable expression clones and auto-induction for protein production in E. coli. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1091:17–32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-691-7_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Winn MD, et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2011;67:235–242. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.McCoy AJ, et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cole DK, et al. Hotspot autoimmune T cell receptor binding underlies pathogen and insulin peptide cross-reactivity. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:2191–2204. doi: 10.1172/JCI85679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shimizu A, et al. Structure of TCR and antigen complexes at an immunodominant CTL epitope in HIV-1 infection. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:3097. doi: 10.1038/srep03097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Adams PD, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maccari G, et al. IPD-MHC 2.0: an improved inter-species database for the study of the major histocompatibility complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D860–D864. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Davis IW, et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W375–W383. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Andreatta M, Lund O, Nielsen M. Simultaneous alignment and clustering of peptide data using a Gibbs sampling approach. Bioinformatics. 2012;29:8–14. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Alvarez B, et al. NNAlign_MA; MHC peptidome deconvolution for accurate MHC binding motif characterization and improved T-cell epitope predictions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2019;18:2459–2477. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Neuroblastoma HLA class I immunopeptidomics data are available through PRIDE (accession PXD027182). Sample files are annotated in Supplementary Table 2. All proteins structures are available in the PDB under accession codes 7MJ6 (HLA-A*02:01–LLLPLLPPL), 7MJ7 (HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSP), 7MJ8 (HLA-A*02:01–LLPLLPPLSPS), 7MJ9 (HLA-A*02:01/LLPRLPPL) and 7MJA (HLA-A*24:02–QYNPIRTTF). The sCRAP algorithm is accessible to the scientific community through a web portal (https://marisshiny.research.chop.edu/sCRAP/). All other data are available within the article and supplementary information files or by request from the corresponding author.