Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1983 Nov;73(3):778–783. doi: 10.1104/pp.73.3.778

Short and Long Term Effects of Root and Shoot Chilling of Ransom Soybean 1

Robert L Musser 1, Shirley A Thomas 1, Paul J Kramer 1
PMCID: PMC1066548  PMID: 16663300

Abstract

The immediate short term effects on some physiological processes and the long term effects on morphology and reproductive development of root- and shoot-chilled soybeans (Glycine max L. cv Ransom) were studied. Roots or shoots of 16- or 17-day-old plants were chilled at 10°C for one week, and then rewarmed to 25°C. Leaf elongation rate, net CO2 uptake rate, and stomatal conductance decreased during root or shoot chilling. Root chilling had only temporary effects on water relations, while shoot chilling caused large changes in potentials during chilling. Most processes measured returned to control levels after two days of rewarming. Root-chilled plants harvested 90 days after emergence were similar in morphology and seed weight to controls. Shoot-chilled plants showed a large increase over controls in axillary branch growth, but an early abortion of flowers and a delayed resumption of flowering caused a 78% reduction in seed weight. Root chilling in this study was found to have little or no long term effect on the plants, while shoot chilling caused significant changes in vegetative morphology, and a delay in flowering and subsequent pod filling.

Full text

PDF
778

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Giaquinta R. T., Geiger D. R. Mechanism of inhibition of translocation by localized chilling. Plant Physiol. 1973 Feb;51(2):372–377. doi: 10.1104/pp.51.2.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Patterson D. T., Bunce J. A., Alberte R. S., Van Volkenburgh E. Photosynthesis in relation to leaf characteristics of cotton from controlled and field environments. Plant Physiol. 1977 Mar;59(3):384–387. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.3.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Taylor A. O., Craig A. S. Plants under Climatic Stress: II. Low Temperature, High Light Effects on Chloroplast Ultrastructure. Plant Physiol. 1971 May;47(5):719–725. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.5.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Taylor A. O., Rowley J. A. Plants under Climatic Stress: I. Low Temperature, High Light Effects on Photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1971 May;47(5):713–718. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.5.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Teeri J. A., Patterson D. T., Alberte R. S., Castleberry R. M. Changes in the photosynthetic apparatus of maize in response to simulated natural temperature fluctuations. Plant Physiol. 1977 Sep;60(3):370–373. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.3.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Waring R. H., Cleary B. D. Plant moisture stress: evaluation by pressure bomb. Science. 1967 Mar 10;155(3767):1248–1254. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3767.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES