Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1984 Feb;74(2):316–319. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.2.316

Comparison of Water Potentials Measured by In Situ Psychrometry and Pressure Chamber in Morphologically Different Species 1

Neil C Turner 1,2,3, R A Spurway 1,2,3, E-D Schulze 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1066675  PMID: 16663415

Abstract

Leaf water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry were compared with leaf water potentials measured by the pressure chamber technique at various values of water potential in Helianthus annuus, Helianthus nuttallii, Vigna unguiculata, Nerium oleander, Pistacia vera, and Corylus avellana. In V. unguiculata, the leaf water potentials measured by the in situ psychrometer oscillated at the same periodicity as, and proportional to, the leaf conductance. In all species, potentials measured by in situ psychrometers operating in the psychrometric mode were linearly correlated with potentials measured with the pressure chamber. However, the in situ psychrometers underestimated the leaf water potential in the two Helianthus species at low water potentials and overestimated the water potential in P. vera, N. oleander, and C. avellana. The underestimation in the two Helianthus species at low water potentials resulted from differences in water potential across the leaf. The overestimation in P. vera, N. oleander, and C. avellana was considered to arise from low epidermal conductances in these species even after abrasion of the cuticle. Pressure-volume studies with Lycopersicon esculentum showed that less water was expressed from distal than proximal leaflets when the whole leaf was slowly pressurized. The implication of this for water relations characteristics obtained by pressure-volume techniques is discussed. We conclude that in situ psychrometers are suitable for following dynamic changes in leaf water potential, but should be used with caution on leaves with low epidermal conductances.

Full text

PDF
316

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyer J. S. Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber. Plant Physiol. 1967 Jan;42(1):133–137. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Savage M. J., Wiebe H. H., Cass A. In situ field measurement of leaf water potential using thermocouple psychrometers. Plant Physiol. 1983 Nov;73(3):609–613. doi: 10.1104/pp.73.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Turner N. C. Correction of flow resistances of plants measured from covered and exposed leaves. Plant Physiol. 1981 Nov;68(5):1090–1092. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.5.1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Twente J. W., Twente J. A. Regulation of hibernating periods by temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Oct;54(4):1044–1051. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES