Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2023 Oct 28;129(11):1707–1716. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02468-8

The Cyclin-dependent kinase 1: more than a cell cycle regulator

Giorgia Massacci 1, Livia Perfetto 2, Francesca Sacco 1,
PMCID: PMC10667339  PMID: 37898722

Abstract

The Cyclin-dependent kinase 1, as a serine/threonine protein kinase, is more than a cell cycle regulator as it was originally identified. During the last decade, it has been shown to carry out versatile functions during the last decade. From cell cycle control to gene expression regulation and apoptosis, CDK1 is intimately involved in many cellular events that are vital for cell survival. Here, we provide a comprehensive catalogue of the CDK1 upstream regulators and substrates, describing how this kinase is implicated in the control of key ‘cell cycle-unrelated’ biological processes. Finally, we describe how deregulation of CDK1 expression and activation has been closely associated with cancer progression and drug resistance.

Subject terms: Bioinformatics, Phosphorylation, Regulatory networks, Cellular signalling networks

Introduction

Progression throughout the cell cycle requires complex regulatory mechanisms that mainly rely on the oscillation of protein level and activity of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), respectively. Widespread compensation among approximately 20 CDKs and 30 cyclins has been reported in mammals [1]. Interestingly, knock-out mice of several CDK genes (e.g., CDK2, CDK3, CDK4, CDK6) have been generated and found to be viable. In contrast, CDK1 conditional knockout mice are embryonic lethal, suggesting an essential role of this gene in cell cycle progression [2]. CDK1, the first identified member of the Cdk family, is conserved in all organisms and regulates the transition between the G2 phase and mitosis. The activity of CDK1 is modulated by its binding to cyclin B1 and by its phosphorylation on crucial residues. Specifically, during the late G2 phase, the gradual accumulation of cyclin B1 promotes the formation of the cyclin B1-CDK1 complex, the pre-Mitosis Promoting Factor (or pre-MPF), which is maintained in an inactive state in the cytoplasm by the phosphorylation of CDK1 on Tyr15 and Thr14 mediated by the WEE1 and MYT1 kinases, respectively [3, 4]. This preparatory step prevents premature entry into mitosis, allowing the cells to check for DNA replication errors through the G2/M checkpoint control governed by the ATM/ATR kinases and grants a ready-to-use pool of cyclin B1-CDK1 complex to use if the cell successfully passes the checkpoints. At the end of the G2 phase, the MPF is activated by two consequent events: the dephosphorylation of Tyr15 and Thr14 residues mediated by the CDC25B/C phosphatases and the phosphorylation of Thr161 mediated by the cyclin H-CDK7 complex [5]. Interestingly, although more than 13,000 reports have been published in the last decades, many questions about CDK1 are still open. By taking advantage of manually annotated signalling resources and recently reported findings, here we provide a comprehensive catalogue of CDK1 upstream regulators and substrates. Our literature screening confirmed that CDK1 is more than a cell cycle regulator, as it was originally identified, and it is involved in a variety of crucial biological processes. Interestingly, these functions are controlled by CDK1 alone or in complex with cyclin B1 and additional cyclins such as cyclin A and cyclin E, suggesting alternative modalities of activation [6]. Finally, alteration of CDK1 expression level has been widely associated to cancer progression, as already extensively reviewed [7, 8]. Here we exploited pan-cancer (phospho)proteomic dataset stored in different databases to clarify the correlation between the phosphorylation of specific regulatory sites of CDK1 and consequently its activation with tumorigenesis.

The CDK1 upstream kinome

Phosphorylation is the fundamental mechanism controlling CDK1 kinase activity. The concerted activity of WEE1 and PKMYT1 kinases and CDC25A, CDC25B and CDC25C phosphatases controls the phosphorylation level of the two inhibitory Thr14 and Tyr15 residues whereas CDK7 phosphorylates the activatory Thr361 (Fig. 1a). Many others phosphorylation sites, mainly located on the kinase domain of CDK1, have been identified in large-scale high-throughput experiments [9]. Apart from Tyr4 and Ser39 phosphorylated by EIF2AK2 and CK2, respectively, the upstream kinases as well as the functional role of the remaining 16 phosphorylation sites are still unknown (Table 1). Interestingly, Johnson and collaborators recently embarked on the characterisation of the human kinome atlas, a very recent tour-de-force study to profile the substrate specificities for 300 human serine/threonine kinases, and were able to identify high-confidence kinases capable of phosphorylating every reported phosphorylation site in the human Ser/Thr phosphoproteome [10]. In Fig. 1a we display for each uncharacterised phosphosite of CDK1 the top predicted kinases (with a percentile score greater than 90%) in the kinome atlas (Fig. 1a). As shown, 12 out of 33 predicted CDK1 kinases are understudied and classified as dark genes [11] GO biological processes enrichment analysis of the CDK1 kinases reveals that many kinases are involved in RTK signalling pathways, including MAPKs, AKT-mTOR as well as DNA repair. By taking advantage of GEPIA, a database of RNA-seq expression data from tumour samples and normal tissues derived from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), upstream CDK1 regulators sharing a highly correlated expression profile across cancer tissues were reported. As shown in Fig. 1b, correlated genes include both well-characterised modulators of the CDK1 activity (eg. PKMYT1, CDC25A/C and WEE1) and some of the kinome atlas-predicted kinases (GSK3A and GRK6). Interestingly, the receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2 was also found among the CDK1-related genes. This is in line with the study of Tan and colleagues which demonstrates that ERBB2 binds to and colocalizes with cyclin B-CDK1 complexes and phosphorylates Tyr15 of CDK1 in breast cancer cells [12]. These observations suggest that CDK1 may be activated by alternative pathways.

Fig. 1. The CDK1 upstream kinome.

Fig. 1

a Schematic representation of the CDK1 regulatory sites and upstream regulators. Known regulatory kinases and phosphatases are represented in green and blue, respectively. Predicted Ser/Thr kinases are represented in light green and white (dark kinases). b Heatmap displaying the Log2 fold-change of gene expression level between tumour and healthy tissues of CDK1 and its upstream regulators according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) GEPIA database.

Table 1.

The CDK1 regulatory kinome.

Gene name CDK1 phosphosite Effect Evidence (PMID)
CDK7 Thr161 up-regulates activity 8344251
CDC25A Thr14-Tyr15 up-regulates activity 10454565
CDC25C Thr14-Tyr15 up-regulates activity 19574738
EIF2AK2 Tyr4 down-regulates 20395957
PKMYT1 Thr14-Tyr15 down-regulates 9001210
ERBB2 Tyr15 down-regulates activity 12049736
WEE1 Tyr15 down-regulates activity 16096060
GRK7 Thr5 unknown 36631611
PLK2/3 Thr5 unknown 36631611
OSR1 Thr240 unknown 36631611
SLK Thr240 unknown 36631611
TAO1/3 Thr240 unknown 36631611
DYRK4 Thr222 unknown 36631611
JNK1/2/3 Thr222 unknown 36631611
MOK Thr222 unknown 36631611
MEKK2 Thr141 unknown 36631611
MST4 Thr141 unknown 36631611
MYO3A Thr141 unknown 36631611
GSK3A Ser46 unknown 36631611
PRP4 Ser46 unknown 36631611
TTBK2 Ser46 unknown 36631611
FAM20C Ser39 unknown 36631611
GRK6 Ser39 unknown 36631611
AURC Ser277 unknown 36631611
MYLK4 Ser277 unknown 36631611
PKG2 Ser277 unknown 36631611
ERK5 Ser265 unknown 36631611
TTBK1 Ser265 unknown 36631611
NDR2 Ser2498 unknown 36631611
MTOR Ser248 unknown 36631611
PAK4/5/6 Ser248 unknown 36631611
CK1G3/2 Ser233 unknown 36631611
IKKA Ser233 unknown 36631611
PLK2 Ser233 unknown 36631611
CAMK2B Ser208 unknown 36631611
CHK1 Ser208 unknown 36631611
CK2A1/2 Ser208 unknown 36631611
CDKL5 Ser178 unknown 36631611
DSTYK Ser178 unknown 36631611
ERK1/5/7 Ser178 unknown 36631611
CDK12/13/19 Ser171 unknown 36631611
CDK8/9 Ser171 unknown 36631611
P38A Ser171 unknown 36631611
CSNK2A1 Ser39 up-regulates 15788687

Well-established and predicted kinases phosphorylating specific residues of CDK1 were extracted from SIGNOR and PhosphositePlus databases are reported [9, 13] .

The CDK1 substrates landscape

CDK1 is a hub kinase that directly phosphorylates approximately 200 proteins, as reported in the Signor database (Table 2) [13]. GO-term enrichment analysis reveals that CDK1 substrates are significantly associated with molecular functions mostly implicated in signalling propagation (eg. kinase, GTPase and protein binding activities) and gene expression modulation (DNA and RNA binding activities) (Fig. 2a). In addition, many of the CDK1 substrates are implicated in the regulation of transcription and to a lesser extent translation. The analysis reveals that besides its well-characterised role in cell division, CDK1 regulates different biological processes, phosphorylating proteins implicated in apoptosis, Golgi organisation and protein transport (Fig. 2b). Although the canonical cell cycle-dependent activity of CDK1 mainly occurs in the nucleus and in the cytosol [14], the ability to coordinate many different processes relies on the complex and dynamin shuttling of CDK1 through the different subcellular compartments. The subcellular compartmentalisation analysis of CDK1 substrates revealed that some of the CDK1 substrates are located in the mitochondria, ER and Golgi compartments (Fig. 2c). As the functional role of CDK1 in the regulation of mitosis has been already extensively reviewed, here we describe how CDK1 alone or in complex with cyclin B1 controls crucial ‘unconventional’ biological functions through the phosphorylation of a highly connected signalling network (Fig. 2d).

Table 2.

The CDK1 substrates.

Gene name Effect Phosphosite Evidence (PMID)
ABI1 inhibition S216 21900237
AKAP12 activation T767 23063527
ANAPC1 activation S355 14657031
APLP2 unknown T736 9109675
AR activation S83 21799006
ATAD5 inhibition S653 31875566
BAD activation S91 24677263
BCL2 activation T56 10766756
BCL2L11 activation S104 22071694
BIRC5 activation T34 11861764
BRCA1 activation S1191-S1189-S1497 19683496
BUB1 activation T609 16760428
BUB1B activation T620 17785528
CASP8 inhibition S387 20937773
CASP9 inhibition T125 16287866
CC2D1A activation S208 20171170
CDC16 activation S560 14657031
CDC23 activation T565 14657031
CDC25A activation S116-S18 12411508
CDC25B activation S321-S160 20801879;12107172
CDC25C opposite effects S214-S168-T48-T67-S122-T130 10864927; 10037602
CDC27 activation T446-S426 14657031
CDC7 activation T376 10846177
CDKN1B inhibition T187 10931950
CEP55 inhibition S428-S425 16198290
CHEK1 activation S301-S286 21765472
CKAP2 activation T623 19369249
CSNK2A1 activation S362-S370-T360-T344 19941816;7592773
CSNK2B activation S209 7578274
CUX1 inhibition S1237-S1270 11584018
DCTN6 activation T186 23455152
DDX3X inhibition T323-T204 16280325
DLG1 unknown S443-S158 19066288
DNMT1 activation S154 21565170
DUT activation S11 8631817
E2F1 activation S337-S332 8087847
ECT2 opposite effects T848-T444-T373 16247472; 16170345
EEF1D unknown S133 12551973
EEF2K inhibition S359 18337751
EGFR inhibition S1026 8360196
EIF4EBP1 inhibition T70 11553333
EIF4G2 activation T508 29530922
EPN1 inhibition S382 10764745
ERCC6L activation T1063 17218258
ESPL1 inhibition S1126 11747808
EZH2 inhibition T487-T345 21659531
FANCG activation S387 15367677
FEN1 inhibition S187 12853968
FOXK2 activation S428-S373 20810654
FOXM1 activation T611-S251 19737929
FOXO1 inhibition S249 18408765
GOLGA2 inhibition S37 9753325
GORASP1 inhibition S274 15834132
HMGA1 inhibition T53-T78-S36 17960875;1939057
HMGA2 inhibition S59-S44 10636877
INCENP activation T412 16378098
IREB2 inhibition S157 18574241
KAT5 activation S90-S86 16103124
KAT7 activation T88-T85 18250300
KHDRBS1 unknown T317 9315091
KIF11 activation T926 9235942
KIF20B activation T1644 11470801
KIF22 activation T463 12727876
KIF2C inhibition T537 20368358
KIF4A activation T1161 29771379
KMT5A activation S100 20966048
KRT18 activation S34 9524113
KRT8 activation S432 9524113
LATS1 activation S613 12372621
LBR inhibition S71 14718546
LIG1 activation S76 12851383
LMNA activation S390-S392-S22 18815303
MAP2K1 inhibition T292-T286 8114697
MAP4 inhibition S696-S787 9398320;10791892
MAPK6 activation S684-T698-S688-ST05 20236090
MASTL activation T194-T207 22354989
MCL1 inhibition T92 20526282
MCM4 inhibition T19 12714602
MDM4 inhibition S96 15735705
MPLKIP activation T120-S104-S93 17310276
MYOD1 inhibition S200-S5 21902831;14749395
NCOA3 inhibition S728 22163316
NFAT5 activation T135 21209322
NIFK activation T238 16244663
NINL activation S185 20890132
NME1 activation S120 18234856
NPM1 inhibition S70-T237-T234-T199 19933706;12058066;
NSFL1C inhibition S140 12810701
NUCKS1 inhibition S181 12413487
NUMA1 inhibition T2055 23921553
NUP210 activation S1881 8672508
NUP50 inhibition S221 19767751
NUP98 inhibition S612-S623-T670 21335236
NUSAP1 inhibition T338-T300 22101338
ORC1 activation T375-S258-S273 11931757
PAPOLA activation S537-S558-S545 34048556
PBK unknown T9 15541388
PIK3C2A inhibition S259 12719431
PIK3C3 inhibition T159 20513426
PITPNM1 activation S382-T287 15125835
PLEC inhibition T4539 8626512
PPP1CA inhibition T320 12202491
PRDX1 inhibition T90 11986303
PRPS1 activation S103 31253668
PTHLH inhibition T121 10373465
PTPN1 unknown S386 8491187
PTPN2 unknown S304 15030318
PTTG2 activation S165 10656688
RAB5B unknown S123 10403367
RAD9A activation S277-S328-T355-S336-T292 12734188
RANBP2 activation S2276-S2251-S2246-S2280 26051540
RANGAP1 activation S428-T409-S442-T2153 15037602
RAP1GAP unknown S484 1406653
RB1 inhibition S249-S811-S807-T252-T373 1756735
RCC1 activation S2-S381-S11-T274 15014043
REPS2 inhibition S463 10764745
RFC1 inhibition T506 12930972
RNMT activation T77 26942677
RPA2 activation S23-S29 1318195
RPS3 activation T221 21871177
RPS6KB1 activation T444-S434-S394 11705993;12586835;9271440
RPTOR unknown S696-T706 20169205
RRM2 inhibition S20-T33 9990288;22632967
RUNX1 opposite effects S276-S21-T273-S266-S249-S397 1705873; 12058866; 11278991
RUNX2 activation S465 16407259
SAMHD1 inhibition T592 23602554
SGO1 activation T346 24055156
SIRT1 activation S540 19107194
SIRT2 inhibition S368 17488717
SLBP inhibition T62 18490441
SP1 activation T739 20150555
SQSTM1 activation T269-S272 20974803
SREBF1 activation S439 16880739
STIM1 inhibition S668 19881501
STIP1 inhibition T332-S189-T198 14754904
SUN1 inhibition S334-S48 25482198
SYN3 activation S470 14732590
TK1 inhibition S13 14697231
TOP2A unknown S1247-S1361-S1354-S1393 7635160
TP53 activation S315 24173284
TP53BP1 inhibition S1678 30685087
TP73 inhibition T86 12676926
TPX2 inhibition T72 25688093
TSC1 inhibition T1047-T417-S584 14551205
UBA1 activation S835-S4 7724583;9099746
UBE2A activation S120 11953320
UBXN2B inhibition S56-T59 23500464
USP16 activation S552 24013421
VCPIP1 inhibition T761-S768 23500464
VIM inhibition S55 7983050
WAC activation T244-T471-T482-T457 30021153
WEE1 inhibition S123 16085715
ZC3HC1 inhibition S395 17389604

CDK1 direct substrates were extracted from the SIGNOR database [13] and reported.

Fig. 2. The CDK1 substrates landscape.

Fig. 2

ac Circular bar plots showing the GO-term enrichment analysis of the CDK1 substrates in terms of molecular function (a), biological processes (b) and cell compartment (c). d Signalling network of CDK1 substrates extracted from SIGNOR database and connected in Cytoscape. GO-term enrichment analysis was performed to group and classify the substrates according to the biological processes and cell compartment localisation. The edges connecting CDK1 to its substrates are red if the interaction is annotated as inhibitory, blue if activatory, black if unknown.

Gene expression regulation

During mitosis, the nuclear envelope breakdown and the chromatin condensation globally downregulate transcription. Consistently, CDK1 controls a network of transcription factors and chromatin regulators, regulating the expression of about 8,000 mitosis-specific genes [15]. Interestingly, recent studies revealed that CDK1 phosphorylates and modulates the activity of crucial transcription factors, including RUNX2, SIRT1/2, NPM1 and SREBF1 (Fig. 2d). The resultant stabilisation and activation of these transcription factors by CDK1 mediates cell proliferation and apoptosis by modulating differentiation and metabolic processes [16, 17].

Signal transduction

CDK1 plays a crucial role in promoting cell proliferation by directly phosphorylating key signalling proteins, such as MAPK6, or ERK3, and MAP2K2 [18]. The CDK1-mediated phosphorylation of MAPK6 leads to the activation of the cascade of MAPKs signalling pathways. Additionally, CDK1 is known to phosphorylate serine residues on RPTOR and RPS6KB1, indicating a key role of CDK1 in regulating mTORC1 activity [19, 20]. Tendentially, phosphorylation by CDK1 can modulate the activity, localisation, and interactions of signalling kinases, promoting downstream signalling events involved in cell growth, differentiation, and survival.

Apoptosis

The cyclinB1-CDK1 complex localises in the mitochondria, playing a crucial and complex role in the regulation of apoptosis. Contrasting observations have been reported about the pro-apoptotic or anti-apoptotic role of the cyclinB1-CDK1 complex. While it inhibits apoptosis through the phosphorylation of caspase-9 and BIRC5 proteins [21, 22], it has been reported that the complex promotes cell death by directly phosphorylating and activating Bcl-2 family members. Specifically, CDK1 activates BAD by phosphorylating it on Ser128 and impairing its interaction with 14-3-3 proteins. Consequently, BAD can translocate to the mitochondria promoting mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis [23, 24]. Moreover, CDK1 phosphorylates BCL2L1, BCL2 and MCL1, suppressing their anti-apoptotic functions. Based on these data, the conflicting role of CDK1 in either protecting cells from apoptosis or inducing apoptosis can be affected by different experimental conditions and specific cellular contexts. From a clinical point of view, understanding the contradictory role of CDK1 in apoptosis could be an important achievement in identifying new therapeutic strategies. However, data from animal models and clinical trials are incomplete and the CDK1-mediated regulation of apoptosis remains still poorly investigated.

Mitochondrial processes

Beyond apoptosis, CDK1 regulates other crucial mitochondrial processes, including mitochondrial dynamics through the phosphorylation of specific proteins involved in mitochondrial fusion and fission. For instance, CDK1 phosphorylates Ser585 of Drp-1, inducing its mitochondrial translocation and triggering fission [25]. CDK1 contributes to maintaining cellular redox balance and protects cells from oxidative stress. Indeed, mitochondria-translocated CDK1 phosphorylates Ser106 of the Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (MnSOD) enzyme, stabilising its protein level and enhancing its antioxidant activity [26]. Additionally, it has been shown that CDK1 mediates the upregulation of the oxidative phosphorylation process by phosphorylating Thr150 and Ser159 of SIRT3 [27] and activating a cluster of subunits of the Complex I, which increases the mitochondrial metabolism and ATP production [28].

Golgi remodelling

Evidence also suggests a role of the CDK1 in modulating Golgi-related topological and structural changes. Golgi-located CDK1 phosphorylates GRASP65, GM130 and the small RAS GTPase RAB1 inducing the disassembly of the Golgi network and blocking the vesicle fusion with the ER. CDK1 can also regulate N-glycosylation enzymes, such as MANI. During mitosis, Golgi fragmentation blocks the intra-Golgi transport causing the accumulation of cargo molecules and enzymes. The inhibitory phosphorylation on S12 by CDK1 inhibits MANI activity to limit the aberrant glycosylation of the molecular entities trapped together in the Golgi compartment [29, 30].

Transport

CDK1 phosphorylates and modulates the activity of different transport-related proteins. CDK1-mediated phosphorylation of Rab5B regulates the dynamics and the maturation of early endosomes, impacting the sorting and recycling of internalised membrane proteins. Moreover, CDK1 phosphorylates EPN1, a key regulator of the endocytic processes [31]. Specifically, the CDK1-dependent phosphorylation EPN1 affects its interaction with clathrin and other endocytic proteins, modulating the assembly and dynamics of clathrin-coated pits and vesicles. Additionally, CDK1 phosphorylates nuclear transport factors, including importins and exportins, which are responsible for the recognition and transport of cargo molecules into and out of the nucleus. For instance, the CDK1-mediated phosphorylation of RANBP2 and NUP50, which are compliant with the nuclear export and import pathways, respectively, influences the efficiency and dynamics of nucleocytoplasmic transport processes.

Intermediate-filament organisation

Finally, CDK1 can phosphorylate several intermediate-filament proteins, including vimentin (VIM), lamin A/C (LMNA), and keratin 8 (KRT8). These phosphorylation events serve as crucial regulatory mechanisms that not only influence cell cycle-related alterations in cell morphology and structure but can also play a pivotal role in facilitating cell migration during immune responses or metastasis [32].

In summary, recent studies have implicated CDK1 in a wide variety of cell cycle-independent roles. Although it was originally believed that CDK1 must partner with cyclin B1 to become active, ample demonstration of functions for CDK1 alone has been reported.

CDK1 in cancer

Deregulation of CDK1 has been closely associated with cancer. Interestingly, oncogenic alterations of CDK1 can be considered rare genetic events, suggesting that complex molecular mechanisms contribute to the aberrant regulation of CDK1 in cancer. Indeed, CDK1 mutations (mostly SNPs) were identified in 0.74% of cancer patients, with the highest frequency in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC), Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) and Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) (Fig. 3a). According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (Fig. 2a) and Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) (Fig. 3b, c), CDK1 is upregulated in many cancerous tissues compared to normal tissues, at both transcript and protein levels. Its overexpression has been correlated with inferior survival rate and poor clinical outcome [3338]. Noteworthy, thanks to the growing availability of patient-specific phosphoproteomic data, it is possible to evaluate the activation of the state of CDK1 by monitoring the phosphorylation level of its regulatory residues. Specifically, by comparing Thr14, Tyr15 and Thr161 levels in different cancer types, it appears that CDK1 is likely to be fully active only in breast cancer tissue (BRCA in Fig. 3b), where the two inhibitory residues appear hypo-phosphorylated, whereas it seems to be inactive (with Thr14 and Tyr15 hyper-phosphorylated or Thr161 hypo-phosphorylated) in the remaining cancer types. Altogether, these observations suggest that while the CDK1 protein level is high in most of the cancer tissues, its activity, as revealed by its phosphorylation status on regulatory sites, seems to be suppressed. Although these observations may seem contradictory, it is important to consider that the biological significance of CDK1 phosphorylation on its function is more complex than previously thought. Despite the expected inhibitory effect on CDK1 activity, the phosphorylation of Tyr15 has been found to be increased in several cancer types and has been associated with the development of drug resistance. This discovery suggests that the impact of CDK1 phosphorylation on its function goes beyond simple inhibition. The upregulation of Tyr15 phosphorylation in cancer may contribute to the dysregulation of CDK1 activity and potentially play a role in the acquisition of resistance to anticancer drugs. The receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2 receptor, SRC kinase and the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Breast Tumour Kinase (BRK) have been shown to phosphorylate Tyr15 of CDK1 [12]. In breast cancer cell lines and primary tumours, the ERRB2-mediated increased phosphorylation of Tyr15 of CDK1 leads to the inactivation of BAD and consequently resistance to taxol-induced apoptosis and drive cells to mitotic slippage and prolonged cell cycle arrest. This allows breast cancer cells to survive microtubule-targeting agent treatment. Additionally, signalling and cell growth and consequently to the onset of drug resistance. Interestingly, the results of our recent study demonstrated a clear link between increased phosphorylation levels of CDK1 at Tyr15 and the development of resistance to FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukaemia cells carrying FLT3-ITD mutations, the most common genetic alterations [39]. Collectively, this evidence reveals the complex interplay between CDK1 phosphorylation, activation and crucial cancer-related processes such as apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, drug resistance, and invasive potential.

Fig. 3. Pan-cancer analysis of CDK1 alteration.

Fig. 3

a Bar plot showing the most common alterations in CDK1 and their frequency in cancer according to the UCSC Genome Browser. b Boxplots representing the mRNA, the total protein and the phosphorylation levels of CDK1 according to data available in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) GEPIA and CPTAC databases. Data are reported as z-score between primary tissues of the selected tumours and normal tissues.

Despite its unclear activation state in cancer, CDK1 has emerged as an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. Although first-generation pan-CDK inhibitors (e.g., flavopiridol and roscovitine) have demonstrated efficacy in inducing G1/G2 phase arrest and ultimately apoptosis of cancer cells [2729], their low specificity and high toxicity have hindered their clinical approval. Recently, highly selective, second-generation inhibitors, RO-3306 and NU6102, have been developed [40, 41]. Despite their potential, to date, limited preclinical studies have been performed to assess their efficacy in targeting alterations of CDK1 in cancer. Combination therapy seems to be an effective approach to enhance the efficacy of CDK1-associated inhibitors in clinical trials. The inhibition of CDK1 induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase where cells are most vulnerable to radiation-induced DNA damage (i) and dysfunction of the DNA repair process, leading to the accumulation of DNA damage and increasing the susceptibility to DNA-damaging agents [42, 43].

Conclusions

Over the past 2 decades, growing evidence has shown that CDK1 possesses functions that extend beyond its traditional role in regulating cell cycle progression. In this review, we interrogate signalling databases to obtain a comprehensive catalogue of CDK1 substrates. The “CDK1 substratome” is implicated in a variety of crucial biological processes, ranging from gene expression regulation, apoptosis, mitochondrial fission and fusion and Golgi structural remodelling. Interestingly, these substrates are not localised in the nucleus and cytosol compartments, suggesting the mitochondrial and Golgi translocation of CDK1 in certain conditions. In this review, we also examined proteins controlling the phosphorylation and consequently the activity of CDK1. Besides the well-characterised modulators of CDK1, our analysis highlights a novel potential role for MYO3A, GSK3A and GRK6 kinases, whose expression profile is highly correlated with CDK1 itself and its modulators across cancer tissues. Finally, by taking advantage of cancer patient-specific transcriptomic, proteomic and phosphoproteomic data stored in different databases, we report that while CDK1 protein is clearly upregulated in tumours, its activity seems to be suppressed, as revealed by its phosphorylation status on regulatory sites. Indeed, CDK1-associated inhibitors failed to demonstrate sufficient efficacy in cancer patients. Future studies will be necessary to understand the functional consequences of targeting CDK1 and its upstream modulators in combination with standard chemotherapeutic drugs. Finally, our perspective highlights that the study of the non-canonical functions of CDK1 is certainly a far cry from being a mature field and the continuous pursuit towards identifying the complete repertoire of its modulators can bring many surprises along the way.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Veronica Venafra for her help in the plots showed in Fig. 2A-B-C. This research was funded by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) with a grant to FS (Start-Up Grant n. 21815) and by the Italian Minister of University and Research (MUR) with a PRIN grant (n. 2022L8RAKN). GM is supported by the AIRC Start-up grant number 21815.

Author contributions

GM, FS designed the study and wrote the manuscript; GM, FS performed the analyses; LV revised the study; FS provided funding.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Martínez-Alonso D, Malumbres M. Mammalian cell cycle cyclins. In: Clotet J, Dodding M, Fagotto F, editors. Seminars in cell and developmental biology. vol. 107. Elsevier Ltd; 2020. p. 1–190. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Santamaría D, Barrière C, Cerqueira A, Hunt S, Tardy C, Newton K, et al. Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature. 2007;448:811–5. doi: 10.1038/nature06046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gavet O, Pines J. Progressive activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 coordinates entry to mitosis. Dev Cell. 2010;18:533–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Krek W, Nigg EA. Differential phosphorylation of vertebrate p34(cdc2) kinase at the G1/S and G2/M transitions of the cell cycle: Identification of major phosphorylation sites. EMBO J. 1991;10:305–16. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07951.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Solomon MJ, Lee T, Kirschner MW. Role of phosphorylation in p34cdc2 activation: Identification of an activating kinase. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:13–27. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development (Cambridge) 2013;140:3079–93. doi: 10.1242/dev.091744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang Y, Liu Q, Guo X, Yuan Q, Nian S, Kang P, et al. Systematic pan-cancer analysis identifies cdk1 as an immunological and prognostic biomarker. J Oncol. 2022;2022:8115474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Liu X, Wu H, Liu Z. An integrative human pan-cancer analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1). Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:2658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D512–20. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Johnson JL, Yaron TM, Huntsman EM, Kerelsky A, Song J, Regev A, et al. An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome. Nature. 2023;613:759–66. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05575-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Berginski ME, Moret N, Liu C, Goldfarb D, Sorger PK, Gomez SM. The dark kinase knowledgebase: an online compendium of knowledge and experimental results of understudied kinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D529–35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tan M, Jing T, Lan KH, Neal CL, Li P, Lee S, et al. Phosphorylation on tyrosine-15 of p34Cdc2 by ErbB2 inhibits p34Cdc2 activation and is involved in resistance to taxol-induced apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2002;9:993–1004. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00510-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lo Surdo P, Iannuccelli M, Contino S, Castagnoli L, Licata L, Cesareni G, et al. SIGNOR 3.0, the SIGnaling network open resource 3.0: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D631–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gavet O, Pines J. Activation of cyclin B1-Cdk1 synchronizes events in the nucleus and the cytoplasm at mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:247–59. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200909144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palozola KC, Donahue G, Liu H, Grant GR, Becker JS, Cote A, et al. Mitotic transcription and waves of gene reactivation during mitotic exit. Science. 2017;358:119–22. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen YJ, Dominguez-Brauer C, Wang Z, Asara JM, Costa RH, Tyner AL, et al. A conserved phosphorylation site within the forkhead domain of FoxM1B is required for its activation by cyclin-CDK1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:30695–707. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.007997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Slee EA, Lu X. Requirement for phosphorylation of P53 at Ser312 in suppression of chemical carcinogenesis. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3105. doi: 10.1038/srep03105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tanguay PL, Rodier G, Meloche S. C-terminal domain phosphorylation of ERK3 controlled by Cdk1 and Cdc14 regulates its stability in mitosis. Biochem J. 2010;428:103–11. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Papst PJ, Sugiyama H, Nagasawa M, Lucas JJ, Maller JL, Terada N. Cdc2-cyclin B phosphorylates p70 S6 kinase on Ser411 at mitosis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:15077–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.24.15077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gwinn DM, Asara JM, Shaw RJ. Raptor is phosphorylated by cdc2 during mitosis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O’ Connor DS, Grossman D, Plescia J, Li F, Zhang H, Villa A, et al. Regulation of apoptosis at cell division by p34 cdc2 phosphorylation of survivin [Internet]. Available from: 10.1073/pnas.240390697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Allan LA, Clarke PR. Phosphorylation of caspase-9 by CDK1/Cyclin B1 protects mitotic cells against apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2007;26:301–10. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhou L, Cai X, Han X, Xu N, Chang DC. CDK1 switches mitotic arrest to apoptosis by phosphorylating Bcl-2/Bax family proteins during treatment with microtubule interfering agents. Cell Biol Int. 2014;38:737–46. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Konishi Y, Lehtinen M, Donovan N, Bonni A. Cdc2 phosphorylation of BAD links the cell cycle to the cell death machinery. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1005–16. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00524-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Taguchi N, Ishihara N, Jofuku A, Oka T, Mihara K. Mitotic phosphorylation of dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 participates in mitochondrial fission. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:11521–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607279200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Candas D, Fan M, Nantajit D, Vaughan AT, Murley JS, Woloschak GE, et al. CyclinB1/Cdk1 phosphorylates mitochondrial antioxidant MnSOD in cell adaptive response to radiation stress. J Mol Cell Biol. 2013;5:166–75. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjs062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu R, Fan M, Candas D, Qin L, Zhang X, Eldridge A, et al. CDK1-mediated SIRT3 activation enhances mitochondrial function and tumor radioresistance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015;14:2090–102. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Z, Fan M, Candas D, Zhang TQ, Qin L, Eldridge A, et al. Cyclin B1/Cdk1 coordinates mitochondrial respiration for cell-cycle G2/M progression. Dev Cell. 2014;29:217–32. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang Y, Seemann J, Pypaert M, Shorter J, Warren G. A direct role for GRASP65 as a mitotically regulated Golgi stacking factor. EMBO J. 2003;22:3279–90. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang s, Haga y, Li J, Zhang J, Kweon HK, Seino J, et al. Mitotic phosphorylation inhibits the Golgi mannosidase MAN1A1. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111679. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kariya K, Koyama S, Nakashima S, Oshiro T, Morinaka K, Kikuchi A. Regulation of complex formation of POB1/Epsin/adaptor protein complex 2 by mitotic phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18399–406. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000521200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kraxner J, Köster S. Influence of phosphorylation on intermediate filaments. Biol Chem. 2023; 404:821–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Xing Z, Wang X, Liu J, Zhang M, Feng K, Wang X. Expression and prognostic value of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene clusters in human breast cancer. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:300060520980647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Bednarek K, Kiwerska K, Szaumkessel M, Bodnar M, Kostrzewska-Poczekaj M, Marszalek A, et al. Recurrent CDK1 overexpression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:11115–26. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-4991-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li M, He F, Zhang Z, Xiang Z, Hu D. CDK1 serves as a potential prognostic biomarker and target for lung cancer. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:0300060519897508. doi: 10.1177/0300060519897508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sung WW, Lin YM, Wu PR, Yen HH, Lai HW, Su TC, et al. High nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of cdk1 expression predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dong S, Huang F, Zhang H, Chen Q. Overexpression of BUB1B, CCNA2, CDC20, and CDK1 in tumor tissues predicts poor survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Biosci Rep. 2019;39:BSR20182306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Yang Y, Liu Q, Guo X, Yuan Q, Nian S, Kang P, et al. Systematic pan-cancer analysis identifies CDK1 as an immunological and prognostic biomarker. 2022;2022:8115474. 10.1155/2022/8115474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Massacci G, Venafra V, Latini S, Bica V, Pugliese GM, Graziosi S, et al. A key role of the WEE1-CDK1 axis in mediating TKI-therapy resistance in FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia. 2023;37:288–97. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01785-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davies TG, Bentley J, Arris CE, Boyle FT, Curtin NJ, Endicott JA, et al. Structure-based design of a potent purine-based cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Nat Struct Biol. 2002;9:745–9. doi: 10.1038/nsb842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vassilev LT, Tovar C, Chen S, Knezevic D, Zhao X, Sun H, et al. Selective small-molecule inhibitor reveals critical mitotic functions of human CDK1 [Internet]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10660-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Liao H, Ji F, Geng X, Xing M, Li W, Chen Z, et al. CDK1 promotes nascent DNA synthesis and induces resistance of cancer cells to DNA-damaging therapeutic agents [Internet]. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 90662–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Prevo R, Pirovano G, Puliyadi R, Herbert KJ, Rodriguez-Berriguete G, O’Docherty A, et al. CDK1 inhibition sensitizes normal cells to DNA damage in a cell cycle dependent manner. Cell Cycle. 2018;17:1513–23. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2018.1491236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES