Wearable biosensors offer noninvasive, real-time, and continuous monitoring of diverse human health data, making them invaluable for remote patient tracking, early diagnosis, and personalized medicine. Breakthroughs in biosensing technologies have made it possible to detect both biophysical parameters, such as heart rate [1,2], body temperature [3,4], blood pressure [5,6,7], and ECG [8,9,10], as well as biochemical parameters, including glucose [11,12], lactate [13,14], cortisol [15,16,17], Na+ [18,19], and K+ [20,21], within various biofluids (like sweat, tears, saliva, and interstitial fluid) [22]. Biosensors have been seamlessly incorporated into a wide range of wearable platforms, such as contact lenses [23,24], wristbands [25,26], patches [27,28], tattoos [29,30], and retainers [31]. While these advances are promising, there remain challenges in terms of accuracy, stability, multiplexed sensing, energy harvesting, and system integration that require further technical innovations [32]. The potential for commercialization and the anticipated healthcare benefits continue to drive rapid progress in wearable biosensor research.
This Special Issue, “Frontiers of Wearable Biosensors for Human Health Monitoring”, presents ten research articles and three reviews showcasing the latest advancements in wearable biosensing technology development, validation studies, and healthcare applications. The research papers cover a diverse spectrum of wearable biosensor research, ranging from the sensing of electrical impedance, transcutaneous gas, heart rate, capillary oxygen desaturation, ECG waveform, intracranial pressure, intra-abdominal pressure, and sleep patterns to the mitigation of data loss in the wearable healthcare ecosystem. Additionally, the reviews in this Special Issue provide comprehensive insights into flexible wearable sensors in medical monitoring, biosensors based on electromyography (EMG), force myography (FMG), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT), and the utilization of wearables for remote healthcare among the elderly.
Respiratory rate is a fundamental vital sign that offers essential information about a person’s overall health and lung function. Historically, spirometry has been the standard for respiratory rate monitoring, but its bulkiness and complexity pose challenges [33]. Yan et al. introduced a wearable head-mounted system that monitors respiration by measuring electrical impedance in the subpapillary pharynx of the mastoid bone [34]. They successfully simulated impedance changes in the pharynx during breathing, integrated a head-mounted device, and confirmed its effectiveness. Test results showed a high correlation with commercial respiratory monitoring devices, making this system a promising solution for real-time continuous personalized respiratory monitoring in healthcare.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals are widely used for diagnosing heart conditions and assessing emotional and psychological states [35]. However, in many wearable ECG systems, only prominent R peaks are evaluated for heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring, while smaller peaks (P, Q, S, and T) are often overlooked. Research indicates that this fine-grained variability data are essential for measuring emotional and stress responses. Arquilla et al. developed various woven textile electrodes (eight different sizes, four different patterns, and two different thread types), testing their performance on 10 participants. They suggest that woven textile electrodes are a viable option for garment-integrated ECG monitoring systems to capture the complete ECG waveform [36]. This research offers valuable guidelines for future woven textile ECG electrode development. Recent research suggests that HRV is an indicator of cognitive fatigue. Continuous monitoring of heart rate through wearable ECG devices is a viable method of assessing cognitive fatigue. However, wearable ECG devices often compromise the sampling rate, affecting HRV signal quality. To explore if lower sampling rates impact HRV features in predicting cognitive fatigue, Lee et al. collected ECG data at 2000 Hz during a typical cognitively fatiguing task, systematically down-sampled the data to various rates, extracted frequency domain features, and developed predictive models [37]. They discovered that a sampling rate of 125 Hz is sufficient for an accurate assessment of cognitive fatigue using frequency domain features. These findings are valuable for designing cost-effective wearables to detect cognitive fatigue.
Bio-pressure measurement plays a vital role in diagnosing various medical conditions. Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) can be indicative of head injuries, hydrocephalus, or infections [38]. However, monitoring ICP in infants is challenging due to the risks (hemorrhage and infection) associated with invasive techniques and the limitations (low accuracy and high cost) of noninvasive methods. Zhang et al. introduced a novel noninvasive approach using a wearable pressure sensor that measures ICP changes by detecting the electrical resistance variation in a liquid metal (Ga)-filled microchannel when it deforms due to inflation [39]. This innovative ICP sensor, fabricated through a freeze-casting method, can be applied directly to infants like a band-aid. Their results showed a high linear correlation and demonstrated the potential for cost-effective noninvasive ICP monitoring in clinical or point-of-care settings. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a crucial factor in diagnosing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) [40]. The existing IAP monitoring method is labor-intensive and provides only a single-point measurement. Kumar et al. introduced a stretchable pressure-sensing sleeve enabling continuous IAP monitoring while significantly reducing the complexity of the process [41]. This sleeve’s sensitivity in low-pressure ranges (<2.7 kPa) is clinically relevant for early IAH and ACS diagnosis. Benchtop testing validated the sleeve’s performance. This stretchable capacitive pressure sensor could potentially reduce the personnel and time needed for continuous IAP monitoring and can be easily adapted with intrabody catheter balloons for on-site intra-abdominal pressure measurement.
Blood oxygen and carbon dioxide levels are essential parameters for evaluating respiratory and metabolic health. Monitoring blood CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) is critical for diagnosing and treating respiratory and metabolic conditions [42]. Instead of invasive arterial blood gas sampling, noninvasive transcutaneous CO2 monitoring provides a promising alternative approach [43]. Cascales and colleagues reported the development of a highly breathable CO2-sensing film for transcutaneous CO2 monitoring through fluorescence quantification [44]. They investigated various HPTS-based ion pairs in diverse support matrices and found the (HPTS)/(TOA)4-embedded PPMA matrix was highly sensitive within the physiological CO2 range (0–50 mmHg). These CO2-sensing films exhibited inherent resistance to humidity variations and maintained photostability during extended continuous sampling. This work holds great potential for commercial, miniaturized wearable devices for transcutaneous CO2 monitoring. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder [45] for which continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most effective treatment [46]. Simple, low-cost, at-home diagnostic tools are needed to improve CPAP adherence. Wearable devices, like smartwatches, measure oxygen saturation in arm or wrist tissues. However, it is unclear if arm oxygen desaturation can gauge CPAP effectiveness. Zhang et al. investigated oxygen desaturation in arm muscles using gold-standard frequency domain multi-distance near-infrared spectroscopy (FDMD-NIRS) during CPAP titration in OSA patients [47]. They found only fingertip SpO2, not arm StO2 (muscle tissue oxygen saturation), reflected reduced desaturation during CPAP titration, likely due to the contribution of venous blood to StO2. This suggests that muscular oxygen desaturation may not be an ideal indicator of CPAP effectiveness. This study advises caution in using these wearables until they have been clinically validated.
Wireless communication is a vital feature in wearables, with Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) being a common choice for data transmission [48,49]. Ensuring reliable and secure data transfer in a wearable healthcare ecosystem requires a systematic evaluation of BLE packet loss and the development of mitigation strategies. Tipparaju et al. conducted a comprehensive assessment of packet losses in Android and iOS-based wearable systems and proposed a mitigation solution that included a reduction in transmission frequency, data bundling, and a queue-based packet transmission protocol [50]. Their approach reduces packet losses to less than 1% and can benefit various applications, such as body sensor networks (BSNs), the Internet of Things (IoT), and smart homes within BLE-based wearable ecosystems.
Machine learning techniques are powerful tools for processing data from wearable sensors, enabling precise disease prediction and early detection [51,52]. In a recent study, Guo et al. developed a 1D-Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based evaluation model using self-designed wearable smart bracelets to assess teenagers’ physical fitness [53]. They collected 1024 photoplethysmography (PPG) data from teenagers, applied noise reduction techniques, and constructed a deep learning model to classify physical fitness levels. This deep learning model demonstrates excellent accuracy in predicting physical fitness for both boys and girls. This study highlights the potential of integrating machine learning techniques with wearable devices for well-being prediction.
The articles in this Special Issue demonstrate the latest advancements in wearable biosensor research. Overcoming challenges such as accuracy, stability, selectivity, motion artifacts, power management, regulatory compliance, and commercialization of these biosensors demands further innovative engineering solutions. Moreover, integrating smart materials [54,55], additive manufacturing (3D printing) [56,57,58], artificial intelligence [59,60], the Internet of Things (IoT) [61,62], and big data [63,64] can further enhance the potential of wearable biosensors for human health monitoring.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the FY23 Competitive Research Grant (CRG) from the South Dakota Board of Regents and the FY24 RSCA Challenge Fund of South Dakota State University.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Chen S., Qi J., Fan S., Qiao Z., Yeo J.C., Lim C.T. Flexible wearable sensors for cardiovascular health monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021;10:2100116. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shen S., Xiao X., Chen J. Wearable triboelectric nanogenerators for heart rate monitoring. Chem. Commun. 2021;57:5871–5879. doi: 10.1039/D1CC02091A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Geng Y., Cao R., Innocent M.T., Hu Z., Zhu L., Wang L., Xiang H., Zhu M. A high-sensitive wearable sensor based on conductive polymer composites for body temperature monitoring. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2022;163:107269. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thiyagarajan K., Rajini G., Maji D. Cost-effective, disposable, flexible, and printable MWCNT-based wearable sensor for human body temperature monitoring. IEEE Sens. J. 2021;22:16756–16763. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lin H., Xu W., Guan N., Ji D., Wei Y., Yi W. Noninvasive and continuous blood pressure monitoring using wearable body sensor networks. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2015;30:38–48. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2015.72. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim J., Chou E.F., Le J., Wong S., Chu M., Khine M. Soft wearable pressure sensors for beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019;8:1900109. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yi Z., Liu Z., Li W., Ruan T., Chen X., Liu J., Yang B., Zhang W. Piezoelectric dynamics of arterial pulse for wearable continuous blood pressure monitoring. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:2110291. doi: 10.1002/adma.202110291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang Z., Zhou Q., Lei L., Zheng K., Xiang W. An IoT-cloud based wearable ECG monitoring system for smart healthcare. J. Med. Syst. 2016;40:286. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0644-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pani D., Dessì A., Saenz-Cogollo J.F., Barabino G., Fraboni B., Bonfiglio A. Fully textile, PEDOT: PSS based electrodes for wearable ECG monitoring systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015;63:540–549. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2465936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang N., Zhou J., Dai G., Huang J., Xie Y. Energy-efficient intelligent ECG monitoring for wearable devices. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2019;13:1112–1121. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2019.2930215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim J., Campbell A.S., Wang J. Wearable non-invasive epidermal glucose sensors: A review. Talanta. 2018;177:163–170. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee H., Song C., Hong Y.S., Kim M., Cho H.R., Kang T., Shin K., Choi S.H., Hyeon T., Kim D.-H. Wearable/disposable sweat-based glucose monitoring device with multistage transdermal drug delivery module. Sci. Adv. 2017;3:e1601314. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saha T., Songkakul T., Knisely C.T., Yokus M.A., Daniele M.A., Dickey M.D., Bozkurt A., Velev O.D. Wireless wearable electrochemical sensing platform with zero-power osmotic sweat extraction for continuous lactate monitoring. ACS Sens. 2022;7:2037–2048. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.2c00830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang R., Zhai Q., An T., Gong S., Cheng W. Stretchable gold fiber-based wearable textile electrochemical biosensor for lactate monitoring in sweat. Talanta. 2021;222:121484. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.An J.E., Kim K.H., Park S.J., Seo S.E., Kim J., Ha S., Bae J., Kwon O.S. Wearable cortisol aptasensor for simple and rapid real-time monitoring. ACS Sens. 2022;7:99–108. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.1c01734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sekar M., Sriramprabha R., Sekhar P.K., Bhansali S., Ponpandian N., Pandiaraj M., Viswanathan C. Towards wearable sensor platforms for the electrochemical detection of cortisol. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020;167:067508. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab7e24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang B., Zhao C., Wang Z., Yang K.-A., Cheng X., Liu W., Yu W., Lin S., Zhao Y., Cheung K.M. Wearable aptamer-field-effect transistor sensing system for noninvasive cortisol monitoring. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabk0967. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk0967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghoorchian A., Kamalabadi M., Moradi M., Madrakian T., Afkhami A., Bagheri H., Ahmadi M., Khoshsafar H. Wearable potentiometric sensor based on Na0. 44MnO2 for non-invasive monitoring of sodium ions in sweat. Anal. Chem. 2022;94:2263–2270. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parrilla M., Ferré J., Guinovart T., Andrade F.J. Wearable potentiometric sensors based on commercial carbon fibres for monitoring sodium in sweat. Electroanalysis. 2016;28:1267–1275. doi: 10.1002/elan.201600070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pirovano P., Dorrian M., Shinde A., Donohoe A., Brady A.J., Moyna N.M., Wallace G., Diamond D., McCaul M. A wearable sensor for the detection of sodium and potassium in human sweat during exercise. Talanta. 2020;219:121145. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu X., Zhao L., Miao B., Gu Z., Wang J., Peng H., Li J., Sun W., Li J. Wearable Multiparameter Platform Based on AlGaN/GaN High-electron-mobility Transistors for Real-time Monitoring of pH and Potassium Ions in Sweat. Electroanalysis. 2020;32:422–428. doi: 10.1002/elan.201900405. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharma A., Badea M., Tiwari S., Marty J.L. Wearable biosensors: An alternative and practical approach in healthcare and disease monitoring. Molecules. 2021;26:748. doi: 10.3390/molecules26030748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim J., Kim M., Lee M.-S., Kim K., Ji S., Kim Y.-T., Park J., Na K., Bae K.-H., Kyun Kim H. Wearable smart sensor systems integrated on soft contact lenses for wireless ocular diagnostics. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Elsherif M., Hassan M.U., Yetisen A.K., Butt H. Wearable contact lens biosensors for continuous glucose monitoring using smartphones. ACS Nano. 2018;12:5452–5462. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hwang S., Lee S. Wristband-type wearable health devices to measure construction workers’ physical demands. Autom. Constr. 2017;83:330–340. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Escobedo P., Ramos-Lorente C.E., Martínez-Olmos A., Carvajal M.A., Ortega-Muñoz M., de Orbe-Payá I., Hernández-Mateo F., Santoyo-González F., Capitán-Vallvey L.F., Palma A.J. Wireless wearable wristband for continuous sweat pH monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021;327:128948. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Silva A.F., Tavakoli M. Domiciliary hospitalization through wearable biomonitoring patches: Recent advances, technical challenges, and the relation to COVID-19. Sensors. 2020;20:6835. doi: 10.3390/s20236835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gong S., Lai D.T., Wang Y., Yap L.W., Si K.J., Shi Q., Jason N.N., Sridhar T., Uddin H., Cheng W. Tattoolike polyaniline microparticle-doped gold nanowire patches as highly durable wearable sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:19700–19708. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b05001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bandodkar A.J., Jia W., Wang J. Tattoo-based wearable electrochemical devices: A review. Electroanalysis. 2015;27:562–572. doi: 10.1002/elan.201400537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim J., Jeerapan I., Imani S., Cho T.N., Bandodkar A., Cinti S., Mercier P.P., Wang J. Noninvasive alcohol monitoring using a wearable tattoo-based iontophoretic-biosensing system. Acs Sens. 2016;1:1011–1019. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brandl M., Grabner J., Kellner K., Seifert F., Nicolics J., Grabner S., Grabner G. A low-cost wireless sensor system and its application in dental retainers. IEEE Sens. J. 2009;9:255–262. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2008.2012205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim J., Campbell A.S., de Ávila B.E.-F., Wang J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:389–406. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu H., Allen J., Zheng D., Chen F. Recent development of respiratory rate measurement technologies. Physiol. Meas. 2019;40:07TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab299e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yan H., Yang X., Liu Y., He W., Liao Y., Yang J., Gao Y. Feasibility analysis and implementation of head-mounted electrical impedance respiratory monitoring. Biosensors. 2022;12:934. doi: 10.3390/bios12110934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lampert R. ECG signatures of psychological stress. J. Electrocardiol. 2015;48:1000–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arquilla K., Devendorf L., Webb A.K., Anderson A.P. Detection of the complete ECG waveform with woven textile electrodes. Biosensors. 2021;11:331. doi: 10.3390/bios11090331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee K.F.A., Chan E., Car J., Gan W.-S., Christopoulos G. Lowering the sampling rate: Heart rate response during cognitive fatigue. Biosensors. 2022;12:315. doi: 10.3390/bios12050315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nag D.S., Sahu S., Swain A., Kant S. Intracranial pressure monitoring: Gold standard and recent innovations. World J. Clin. Cases. 2019;7:1535. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i13.1535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang B., Huang Z., Song H., Kim H.S., Park J. Wearable Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Sensor for Infants. Biosensors. 2021;11:213. doi: 10.3390/bios11070213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Prasad G.R., Rao J.S., Aziz A., Rashmi T. The role of routine measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in preventing abdominal compartment syndrome. J. Indian Assoc. Pediatr. Surg. 2017;22:134. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_222_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Senthil Kumar K., Xu Z., Sivaperuman Kalairaj M., Ponraj G., Huang H., Ng C.-F., Wu Q.H., Ren H. Stretchable capacitive pressure sensing sleeve deployable onto catheter balloons towards continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Biosensors. 2021;11:156. doi: 10.3390/bios11050156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Umeda A., Ishizaka M., Ikeda A., Miyagawa K., Mochida A., Takeda H., Takeda K., Fukushi I., Okada Y., Gozal D. Recent insights into the measurement of carbon dioxide concentrations for clinical practice in respiratory medicine. Sensors. 2021;21:5636. doi: 10.3390/s21165636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Huttmann S.E., Windisch W., Storre J.H. Techniques for the measurement and monitoring of carbon dioxide in the blood. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014;11:645–652. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-387FR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cascales J.P., Li X., Roussakis E., Evans C.L. A Patient-Ready Wearable Transcutaneous CO2 Sensor. Biosensors. 2022;12:333. doi: 10.3390/bios12050333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Senaratna C.V., Perret J.L., Lodge C.J., Lowe A.J., Campbell B.E., Matheson M.C., Hamilton G.S., Dharmage S.C. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population: A systematic review. Sleep Med. Rev. 2017;34:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sharma S.K., Agrawal S., Damodaran D., Sreenivas V., Kadhiravan T., Lakshmy R., Jagia P., Kumar A. CPAP for the metabolic syndrome in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:2277–2286. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang Z., Qi M., Hügli G., Khatami R. Quantitative changes in muscular and capillary oxygen desaturation measured by optical sensors during continuous positive airway pressure titration for obstructive sleep apnea. Biosensors. 2021;12:3. doi: 10.3390/bios12010003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xian X. Wireless Computing in Medicine: From Nano to Cloud with Ethical and Legal Implications. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2016. Diagnostic Improvements: Treatment and Care; pp. 79–105. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang T., Lu J., Hu F., Hao Q. Bluetooth low energy for wearable sensor-based healthcare systems; Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC); Seattle, WA, USA. 8–10 October 2014; pp. 251–254. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tipparaju V.V., Mallires K.R., Wang D., Tsow F., Xian X. Mitigation of data packet loss in bluetooth low energy-based wearable healthcare ecosystem. Biosensors. 2021;11:350. doi: 10.3390/bios11100350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Beniczky S., Karoly P., Nurse E., Ryvlin P., Cook M. Machine learning and wearable devices of the future. Epilepsia. 2021;62:S116–S124. doi: 10.1111/epi.16555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kubota K.J., Chen J.A., Little M.A. Machine learning for large-scale wearable sensor data in Parkinson’s disease: Concepts, promises, pitfalls, and futures. Mov. Disord. 2016;31:1314–1326. doi: 10.1002/mds.26693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Guo J., Wan B., Zheng S., Song A., Huang W. A Teenager Physical Fitness Evaluation Model Based on 1D-CNN with LSTM and Wearable Running PPG Recordings. Biosensors. 2022;12:202. doi: 10.3390/bios12040202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Trovato V., Sfameni S., Rando G., Rosace G., Libertino S., Ferri A., Plutino M.R. A review of stimuli-responsive smart materials for wearable Technology in Healthcare: Retrospective, perspective, and prospective. Molecules. 2022;27:5709. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jin H., Jin Q., Jian J. Wearable Technologies. Volume 2. InTech; Rijeka, Italy: 2018. Smart materials for wearable healthcare devices; p. 64. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu C., Huang N., Xu F., Tong J., Chen Z., Gui X., Fu Y., Lao C. 3D printing technologies for flexible tactile sensors toward wearable electronics and electronic skin. Polymers. 2018;10:629. doi: 10.3390/polym10060629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kalkal A., Kumar S., Kumar P., Pradhan R., Willander M., Packirisamy G., Kumar S., Malhotra B.D. Recent advances in 3D printing technologies for wearable (bio) sensors. Addit. Manuf. 2021;46:102088. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yin X.-Y., Zhang Y., Cai X., Guo Q., Yang J., Wang Z.L. 3D printing of ionic conductors for high-sensitivity wearable sensors. Mater. Horiz. 2019;6:767–780. doi: 10.1039/C8MH01398E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang Y., Hu Y., Jiang N., Yetisen A.K. Wearable artificial intelligence biosensor networks. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023;219:114825. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nahavandi D., Alizadehsani R., Khosravi A., Acharya U.R. Application of artificial intelligence in wearable devices: Opportunities and challenges. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;213:106541. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Surantha N., Atmaja P., Wicaksono M. A review of wearable internet-of-things device for healthcare. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021;179:936–943. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hiremath S., Yang G., Mankodiya K. Wearable Internet of Things: Concept, architectural components and promises for person-centered healthcare; Proceedings of the 2014 4th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare-Transforming Healthcare Through Innovations in Mobile and Wireless Technologies (MOBIHEALTH); Athens, Greece. 3–5 November 2014; pp. 304–307. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wu J., Li H., Cheng S., Lin Z. The promising future of healthcare services: When big data analytics meets wearable technology. Inf. Manag. 2016;53:1020–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mezghani E., Exposito E., Drira K., Da Silveira M., Pruski C. A semantic big data platform for integrating heterogeneous wearable data in healthcare. J. Med. Syst. 2015;39:185. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0344-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]