Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1984 Jul;75(3):766–772. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.3.766

Theoretical and Experimental Errors for In Situ Measurements of Plant Water Potential 1

Kenneth A Shackel 1
PMCID: PMC1066990  PMID: 16663701

Abstract

Errors in psychrometrically determined values of leaf water potential caused by tissue resistance to water vapor exchange and by lack of thermal equilibrium were evaluated using commercial in situ psychrometers (Wescor Inc., Logan, UT) on leaves of Tradescantia virginiana (L.). Theoretical errors in the dewpoint method of operation for these sensors were demonstrated. After correction for these errors, in situ measurements of leaf water potential indicated substantial errors caused by tissue resistance to water vapor exchange (4 to 6% reduction in apparent water potential per second of cooling time used) resulting from humidity depletions in the psychrometer chamber during the Peltier condensation process. These errors were avoided by use of a modified procedure for dewpoint measurement. Large changes in apparent water potential were caused by leaf and psychrometer exposure to moderate levels of irradiance. These changes were correlated with relatively small shifts in psychrometer zero offsets (−0.6 to −1.0 megapascals per microvolt), indicating substantial errors caused by nonisothermal conditions between the leaf and the psychrometer. Explicit correction for these errors is not possible with the current psychrometer design.

Full text

PDF
766

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrs H. D. Psychrometric Measurement of Leaf Water Potential: Lack of Error Attributable to Leaf Permeability. Science. 1965 Jul 2;149(3679):63–65. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3679.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rawlins S. L. Systematic Error in Leaf Water Potential Measurements with a Thermocouple Psychrometer. Science. 1964 Oct 30;146(3644):644–646. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3644.644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Savage M. J., Wiebe H. H., Cass A. In situ field measurement of leaf water potential using thermocouple psychrometers. Plant Physiol. 1983 Nov;73(3):609–613. doi: 10.1104/pp.73.3.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Turner N. C., Spurway R. A., Schulze E. D. Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species. Plant Physiol. 1984 Feb;74(2):316–319. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.2.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Twente J. W., Twente J. A. Regulation of hibernating periods by temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Oct;54(4):1044–1051. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wiebe H. H., Prosser R. J. Influence of temperature gradients on leaf water potential. Plant Physiol. 1977 Feb;59(2):256–258. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES