Abstract
Objectives: Breastfeeding during pregnancy has unintended repercussions that have yet to be determined. Previous research employed various approaches and reached varied outcomes, with some emphasizing on advantages and others focusing on hazards. With this study we aim at shedding light on the effects of breastfeeding during pregnancy on the outcome of pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage.
Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review of relevant papers which have been published in English between 2014 and 2022 by using the PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines. Databases identified 257 records, which were checked for their relatedness to the topic (title and abstract), and compliance with the selection criteria. Only 10 records met all requirements and were included in the present review.
Results:The results revealed that breastfeeding during pregnancy appeared to be unrelated to pregnancy outcome and miscarriage risk, notwithstanding the need for caution in women at risk of preterm birth and high-risk pregnancies.
Conclusion:All studies recognized the high nutritional requirements of lactating pregnant women as well as the importance of proper nutrition for a safe breastfeeding for both the mother and child (children). Further research, with larger samples and adequate methodology, is expected to lead to safer conclusions for breastfeeding during pregnancy.
Keywords:breastfeeding, breastfeeding during pregnancy, miscarriage, pregnancy, lactation.
INTRODUCTION
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nation Children’s Fund (UNICEF), breastfeeding is the ideal form of nutrition that promotes child health and survival (1-2). Breastfeeding has many short- and long-term health benefits for infants and their mothers (2-6). Recommendations support starting nursing within one hour after delivery, exclusive breastfeeding for six months, and breastfeeding until at least two years after birth, supplemented with other foods (7). However less than half of newborns in low- and middle-income countries are optimally nursed according to these guidelines (8).
There are mothers who breastfeed throughout their second pregnancy. This practice is known as breastfeeding during pregnancy (BDP) (9-10). In this case, mothers have to decide about weaning their breastfed child or continue breastfeeding (11-12). In either Europe or the United States, mothers do not frequently engage in this practice (9). When nursing coincides with pregnancy, there is frequently a significant cultural taboo and many women wean their infants when they become pregnant again (14-16). Besides, because of expected criticism, this practice may not be discussed with health professionals (17-18).
There are considerable factors which may discourage mothers from attempting BDP (19-23). Mothers and health care professionals worry about the impact of breastfeeding on premature birth, miscarriage or low birth weight (24). Additionally, mothers usually wonder whether breastfeeding is going to affect their energy reserves or the nutrition of the fetus (25-26). According to previous studies, pregnant women who are properly nourished can support their body, the nursing child and the fetus (27). On the other hand, some studies showed that malnourishment could negatively affect the development of the fetus and the nutrients he/she needs for a smooth development (28).
There is much consideration about milk quality and quantity for the breastfeeding child. Although mother's milk remains beneficial (29), it changes in taste and quantity (30-31). This is usually the reason why most children who are breastfed by their pregnant mother stop breastfeeding on their own (26). Additionally, health care professionals seem to worry about the impact of BDP on infant nutrition, since the newborns needs are more important (32). Because of this fact and its potential impact on pregnancy outcomes, health experts do not suggest or prevent BDP in pregnant women. There is no doubt that BDP promotes mother–child attachment (29, 33-35), while it also facilitates the adjustment of the toddler to the new infant. The breastfed child does not need to be weaned abruptly, while he/she receives the valuable components of mother's milk (36). As long as the mother experiences a low-risk pregnancy and is healthy, she has the opportunity to remain in this close relationship with her child, as his/her sibling grows inside her. Some of the benefits of BDP for the mother comprise the acquisition of self-respect, self-satisfaction and confidence in her offering. Therefore, BDP can maintain the pregnant woman's calmness and emotional relaxation (37).
Since the available studies have focused on isolated aspects of BDP, the consequences of BDP have not been clearly determined yet (38-39). This systematic review sheds light on the effects of BDP on the outcome of pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Our objective was to compile and synthesize the available evidence in order to determine whether BDP can lead to premature birth, miscarriage or low birth weight.
METHODS
Study design
We conducted a systematic literature review to find all data related to BDP and the consequences it has for the outcome of pregnancy. Information about BDP benefits and risks was collected and analyzed from the available publications, following the PRISMA guidelines for reporting the review (40). Articles identified via the PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar search engines had to be published in English between 2014 and 2022.
We used the following search terms using multiple combinations: “breastfeeding OR lactation” AND “pregnancy OR gestation” AND “Breastfeeding During Pregnancy OR Breastfeeding While Pregnant AND “benefits OR profits OR advantages” AND “risks OR drawbacks OR miscarriage” AND “mother OR toddler OR infant”.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
We selected articles published in internationally recognized scientific journals. All cohort cross-sectional studies and position papers that investigated the effects of breastfeeding during pregnancy were evaluated. The research outcomes had to address the topic of pregnancy outcomes, including the number of preterm births (babies delivered alive before week 37 of pregnancy) and spontaneous abortions (the loss of an embryo or fetus before week 22 of pregnancy) as well as infant’s weight at birth. We excluded studies that (a) were not quantitative, including editorial letters and review papers (whether systematic or not); (b) focused exclusively on either breastfeeding or the pregnancy period; and (c) did not report any effect or finding that could justify their selection.
Study selection
All articles that emerged from the initial search were screened based on their titles and abstracts. First, we removed duplicate articles and then we applied exclusion criteria as mentioned above. We used the same exclusion criteria for the full-text screening of papers. Data extracted included the authors’ names and publication year, the title of the article in English, the study design, and research aims, outcome measures and main findings. In order to process the data and findings, we used the method of narrative analysis due to the heterogeneity of studies that emerged from the systematic review in terms of design and method, results and form of each study (9, 25, 27).
Quality assessment of the articles
Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically assessing the outcome of scientific research to judge its trustworthiness, value and relevance. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) Systematic Review Checklist 201725 was used to assess the quality of each publication (41) (Table 1). The ten criteria are classified as “yes’, “no” or “can’t tell”.
RESULTS
Search outcomes
Two hundred fifty-seven records came from databases: 135 from Google Scholar, 66 from PubMed and 56 from Scopus. A total of 220 records, which remained after deduplication, were screened; 92 records not related to the subject were excluded during the initial screening based on their title and abstract. We excluded 15 more records for not having full text availability. Finally, we included 113 records in the data extraction and data analysis phase: full-text articles were assessed for full reading. Only five studies met the inclusion criteria and their full text was reviewed for further assessment.
Selected studies referred to breastfeeding during pregnancy and focused on pregnancy outcome and risk of miscarriage. They compared the effects of BDP on pregnant lactating women with pregnant women who did not breastfeed their toddler.
PRISMA diagram
The detailed selection process with the flow of information during the search and screening phases is illustrated in Figure 1.
BDP effects on the outcome of the pregnancy
Most studies did not find any correlation between BDP and pregnancy outcome, pointing out that there was insufficient data. Ayrim (37) conducted a study by classifying two groups of women (subjects who became pregnant while breastfeeding and others who became pregnant after discontinuation of lactation). During pregnancy, all participants in the nursing group maintained breastfeeding. Members of the lactating group gained less weight during pregnancy than those of the non-lactating group, and this difference was statistically significant. Even though adverse pregnancy outcomes such as hyperemesis gravidarum, threatened abortion, preterm labor, and delivery were found to be higher in the lactating group than in the non-lactating one, this was not statistically significant, most likely due to the small number of subjects in each group.
Also, according to Cetin (25), there is not enough research to suggest that women of reproductive age who continue to breastfeed while pregnant have an increased risk of miscarriage or premature birth in the wider population as a whole. It is also improbable that the pregnancybreastfeeding overlap would result in considerable intrauterine growth restriction, especially in healthy and properly nourished women from prosperous countries. Cetin pointed out that more research was needed in order to better understand the physiological and pathological consequence when a new pregnancy overlapped with breastfeeding.
Two studies highlighted some risks related to BDP (28, 38). Molitoris concluded that there was a positive association during the first five months of pregnancy and that the miscarriage rate was higher when mothers exclusively breastfed during pregnancy. In addition, Molitoris pointed out that the risk of miscarriage in case of subsequent pregnancy was heightened and it was relatively large compared to that attributed to other characteristics with known associations. However, no increased risk was found with complementary breastfeeding, but more research is necessary in order to associate the benefits from breastfeeding for both the mother and toddler with the estimated risk of miscarriage. The intensity of breast-feeding should also be considered as an important factor in the association between BDP and miscarriage risk, since breastfeeding duration differs between mothers, as well as the quantity of milk expressed. Finally, Shaaban et al (27) concluded that BDP was not related to a substantial rise in miscarriage rates but it was associated with an increased risk of maternal anemia, delayed fetal growth, extended labor, low birth weight, and lastly, a greater likelihood of having a caesarian section. When previous miscarriages where concerned, the risk of a miscarriage was increased. Table 2 illustrates the possible effect of DBF on pregnancy outcome, as pointed out by the relevant studies.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this review provide an overview of the most recent conclusions about BDP, since most selected articles are dated within the last eight years. In most cases, BDP does not pose a risk to the pregnancy and the fetus, especially if the pregnancy is normal. It cannot be considered that BDP is contraindicated, since there is not enough scientific data on the safety of BDF to support this reasoning (9, 25, 37).
Research questions were answered relating to the effect that BDP can have on the fetus and the outcome of the pregnancy itself. Given the numerous benefits of breastfeeding, the scarcity of research on the effect of BDP on fetal and newborn growth, and the fact that the most recent studies show no association or negative effect, BDP is recommended, but with the caveat that more research will be conducted. The risk of miscarriage is pointed out in case of a high-risk pregnancy (28, 38). Mothers who experience BDP need to be consistent with an adequate diet, enriched in vitamins and nutrients, sleep more hours and seek the advice and guidance of their gynecologist.
Additionally, literature does not justify stopping breastfeeding when the mother becomes pregnant again, since there is no correlation of BDP with the reduced fetal and neonatal weight and growth. The continued contact with the mother, the companionship of the newborn sibling, the joint experience of breastfeeding will strengthen the emotional and family bonds, while offering the nursing child all the benefits of breastfeeding. Provided that breastfeeding is complementary and the breastfed child is properly fed, there is no risk to its development. Nevertheless, further research is expected to lead to safer conclusions (9, 25, 42).
Breastfeeding during pregnancy could not have negative effects on the outcome of pregnancy under physiological conditions (9, 33, 43-44), and therefore the present study highlights the importance and necessity of the practice of BDP based on the desire of the mother, the safe state of the pregnancy and the numerous positive effects on both the breastfeeding mother and child (children) (45).
In case of a high-risk pregnancy, individual advice may differ, and healthcare professionals might decide to discourage breastfeeding in pregnant women with an insufficient nutrition, severe intrauterine growth restriction, or a history of recurrent miscarriage or a threat of premature delivery, to prevent a potential higher likelihood of uterine contractions (25). Mothers and health care professionals should cooperate in order to decide whether the mother is safe to breastfeed while pregnant. In addition, given the nutritional and energy requirements of both lactation and pregnancy, nursing mothers should be properly informed about the indicative diet they should follow. It remains a pious desire to properly inform and train health professionals so that they will be able to support lactating pregnant women by providing them with information, advice and breastfeeding techniques (46-47).
It is encouraged that nursing be supported during pregnancy, particularly during the first and second trimesters, by advising an adequate diet and nutrition to mothers who choose to continue breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is also considered safe in the third trimester of pregnancy, unless there is a risk of preterm birth (4).
The need of increasing new parents' understanding of BDP is undeniable in order to normalize it in the social context, acknowledge its usefulness, and recognize the consequent and significant contribution of the mothers who practice it (48).
CONCLUSION
Breastfeeding during pregnancy appears to be unrelated to pregnancy outcome and miscarriage risk, notwithstanding the need for caution in women at risk of preterm birth and high-risk pregnancies. All studies recognized the high nutritional requirements and the importance of proper nutrition of the lactating pregnant woman, for a safe breastfeeding, for both the mother and child (children). Health care providers who offer pregnancy screening and breastfeeding support are required to be able to counsel women regarding BDP and give professional advice supported by scientific data. Most studies included in the present research support BDP provided that the mother is consistent with an adequate diet and she is willing and supported to continue breastfeeding. The studies also stress the fact that mothers could breastfeed during the third trimester of pregnancy unless there is a risk of premature delivery.
Undoubtedly, more research is needed using well-designed observational prospective studies which will compare mothers who experience BDP with others that do not, in order to clarify the outcome for the mother and the fetus. Further research, with larger samples and adequate methodology, is expected to lead to safer conclusions for BDP.
Conflicts of interest: none declared.
Financial support: The article processing charge of this review has been funded by the Special Account for Research Grants of the University of West Attica.
TABLE 1.
Methodological quality of studies according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)
TABLE 2.
Possible effect of breastfeeding during pregnancy on the outcome of pregnancy
FIGURE 1.
Flow diagram: structure search strategy
Contributor Information
Violeta STALIMEROU, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 12243 Egaleo, Greece.
Maria DAGLA, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 12243 Egaleo, Greece.
Victoria VIVILAKI, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 12243 Egaleo, Greece.
Eirini OROVOU, Department of Midwifery, University of Western Macedonia, Keptse, 50200 Ptolemaida, Greece.
Evangelia ANTONIOU, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 12243 Egaleo, Greece.
Maria ILIADOU, Department of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, 12243 Egaleo, Greece.
References
- 1.WHO, UNICEF. A Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42590/1/9241562218.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2022).
- 2.UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. In: Van Esterik P, editor. Celebrating the Innocenti declaration on the protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding. Past achievements, present challenges and priority actions for infant and young child feeding. 2nd ed. Florence: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 2006.
- 3.Iliadou M, Lykeridou K, Prezerakos P, et al. Short- and long-term health benefits of breastfeeding for infants and mothers: A review. Epitheorese Klinikes Farmakologias kai Farmakokinetikes. 2019;37:29–34. [Google Scholar]
- 4.North K, Gao M, Allen G, et al. Breastfeeding in a global context: epidemiology, impact, and future directions. Clinical Therapeutics. 2022;44:228–244. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gartner L, Morton J, Lawrence R, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115:496–506. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Victora C, Bahl R, Barros A, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet. 2016;387:475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu H, Zhao M, Magnussen C, et al. Global prevalence of WHO infant feeding practices in 57 LMICs in 2010–2018 and time trends since 2000 for 44 LMICs. E Clinical Medicine. 2021;37:100971. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sinkiewicz-Darol E, Bernatowicz-Łojko U, Łubiech K, et al. Tandem Breastfeeding: A Descriptive Analysis of the Nutritional Value of Milk When Feeding a Younger and Older Child. Nutrients. 2021;13:277. doi: 10.3390/nu13010277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Krishnendu M, Devaki G. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Towards Breastfeeding Among Lactating Mothers in Rural Areas of Thrissur District of Kerala, India: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2017;10:683–690. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tracz J, Gajewska D. Factors Influencing the Duration of Breastfeeding among Polish Women. J Mother Child. 2020;24:39–46. doi: 10.34763/jmotherandchild.2020241.2006.000007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van Dellen S, Wisse B, Mobach M, et al. The effect of a breastfeeding support programme on breastfeeding duration and exclusivity: a quasi-experiment. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:993. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7331-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.O'rourke M. P, Spatz D. Women's experiences with tandem breastfeeding. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 2019;44:220–227. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.López-Fernández G, Barrios M, Goberna-Tricas J, et al. Breastfeeding during pregnancy: A systematic review. Women and Birth. 2017;30:e292–e300. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Çınar N, Suzan Ö, Topal S, et al. Mothers’ breastfeeding attitudes when lactation overlaps with a new pregnancy. Malawi Medical Journal. 2022;34:53–59. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v34i1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ishii H. Does breastfeeding induce spontaneous abortion? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:864–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moscone S, Moore M. Breastfeeding during pregnancy. J Hum Lact. 1993;9:83–88. doi: 10.1177/089033449300900219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marquis G S, Penny M, Diaz J, et al. Postpartum consequences of an overlap of breastfeeding and pregnancy: reduced breast milk intake and growth during early infancy. Pediatrics. 2002;109:e56–e56. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.e56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brown C, Dodds L, Legge A, et al. Factors influencing the reasons why mothers stop breastfeeding. Can J Public Health. 2014;105:79–185. doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Madarshahian F, Hassanabadi M. A comparative study of breastfeeding during pregnancy: impact on maternal and newborn outcomes. J Nurs Res. 2012;20:74–80. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0b013e31824777c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Albadran M. Effect of Breastfeeding during Pregnancy on the Occurrence of Miscarriage and Preterm Labour. Iraqi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;11:3. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Minh L, Tawfik G, Ghozy S, et al. Feto-Maternal Outcomes of Breastfeeding during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Trop Pediatr 2021. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Baranowska B, Malinowska M, Stanaszek E, et al. Extended Breastfeeding in Poland: Knowledge of Health Care Providers and Attitudes on Breastfeeding Beyond Infancy. J Hum Lact. 2019;35:371–380. doi: 10.1177/0890334418819448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cetin I, Assandro P, Massari M, et al. Breastfeeding during pregnancy: position paper of the Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine and the Task Force on Breastfeeding, Ministry of Health, Italy. J Hum Lact. 2014;30:20–27. doi: 10.1177/0890334413514294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Çınar N, Suzan Ö, Topal S, et al. Mothers’ breastfeeding attitudes when lactation overlaps with a new pregnancy. Malawi Medical Journal. 2022;34:53–59. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v34i1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shaaban O, Abbas A, Abdel Hafiz H, et al. Effect of pregnancy-lactation overlap on the current pregnancy outcome in women with substandard nutrition: a prospective cohort study. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2015;7:213–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Molitoris J. Breastfeeding during pregnancy and its association with childhood malnutrition and pregnancy loss in low- and middle-income countries. Lund Papers in Economic Demography. 2018;3:1–81. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cunniff A, Spatz D. Mothers' Weaning Practices when Infants Breastfeed for More Than One Year. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2017;4:88–94. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perrin M, Fogleman A, Newburg D, et al. A longitudinal study of human milk composition in the second year postpartum: implications for human milk banking. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13:12239. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosenberg G, Mangel L, Mandel D, et al. Tandem Breastfeeding and Human Milk Macronutrients: A Prospective Observational Study. J Hum Lact. 2021;37:723–729. doi: 10.1177/08903344211003827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Victora C, Bahl R, Barros A, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.O’Rourke M, Spatz D. Women's Experiences with Tandem Breastfeeding. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2019;44:220–227. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Floricica C, Luminita S, Roxana N. The importance of breastfeeding on the development of the mother-child relationship from an emotional point of view. Technium Soc Sci J. 2021;23:467. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peñacoba C, Catala P. Associations between breastfeeding and mother–infant relationships: a systematic review. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2019;14:616–629. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2019.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.López-Fernández G, Barrios M, Goberna-Tricas J. Breastfeeding during pregnancy: A systematic review. Women Birth. 2017;30:292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ayrim A, Gunduz S, Akcal B. Breastfeeding throughout pregnancy in Turkish women. Breastfeed Med. 2014;9:157–160. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2013.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Molitoris J. Breast-feeding During Pregnancy and the Risk of Miscarriage. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019;51:153–163. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Monasta L, Cetin I, Davanzo R. Breastfeeding during pregnancy: safety and socioeconomic status. Breastfeed Med. 2014;9:322. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:2535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Singh J. Critical appraisal skills programme. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2013;4:76–76. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Demilew Y. Factors associated with mothers’ knowledge on infant and young child feeding recommendation in slum areas of Bahir Dar City, Ethiopia: cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2510-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Melika F, Allah N. Counseling Program about Tandem Breastfeeding for Pregnant Lactating Mothers. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2019;8:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Erdoğan Ç, Turan T. Determination of breast milk insufficiency perceptions of tandem breastfeeding mothers; A case-control study. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 2022:1355–1841. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pareja R, Marquis G, Penny M, et al. A case-control study to examine the association between breastfeeding during late pregnancy and risk of a small-for-gestational-age birth in Lima, Peru. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11:190–201. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Amir L, Bearzatto A. Overcoming challenges faced by breastfeeding mothers. Australian Family Physician. 2016;45:552–556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McLelland G, Hall H, Gilmour C, et al. Support needs of breast-feeding women: views of Australian midwives and health nurses. Midwifery. 2015;31:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Naja F, Chatila A, Ayoub J, et al. Prenatal breastfeeding knowledge, attitude and intention, and their associations with feeding practices during the first six months of life: a cohort study in Lebanon and Qatar. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;15 doi: 10.1186/s13006-022-00456-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]