Abstract
Influenza A virus (IAV) continues to pose a significant global health threat, causing severe respiratory infections that result in substantial annual morbidity and mortality. Recent research highlights the pivotal role of innate immunity, cell death, and inflammation in exacerbating the severity of respiratory viral diseases. One key molecule in this process is ZBP1, a well-recognized innate immune sensor for IAV infection. Upon activation, ZBP1 triggers the formation of a PANoptosome complex containing ASC, caspase-8, and RIPK3, among other molecules, leading to inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation for the maturation of IL-1β and IL-18. However, the role for other molecules in this process requires further evaluation. In this study, we investigated the role of MLKL in regulating IAV-induced cell death and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Our data indicate IAV induced inflammatory cell death through the ZBP1-PANoptosome, where caspases and RIPKs serve as core components. However, IAV-induced lytic cell death was only partially dependent on RIPK3 at later timepoints and was fully independent of MLKL throughout all timepoints tested. Additionally, NLRP3 inflammasome activation was unaffected in MLKL-deficient cells, establishing that MLKL and MLKL-dependent necroptosis do not act upstream of NLRP3 inflammasome activation, IL-1β maturation, and lytic cell death during IAV infection.
Keywords: IAV, cell death, PANoptosis, necroptosis, inflammasome, MLKL, caspase, gasdermin, executioner, pyroptosis, apoptosis, NLRP3, RIPK3
1. Introduction
Influenza A virus (IAV) causes annual upper and lower respiratory infections world-wide, resulting in considerable morbidity, mortality, and economic burden [1]. The pathogenesis of IAV infection has been linked to severe lung inflammation, and immune-mediated lung inflammation and cell death are recognized as the primary factors responsible for IAV-induced pathology [2,3,4,5,6,7]. These cell death mechanisms, including IAV-induced cell death, have been extensively studied in the last decade and have been fundamental to the establishment of crosstalk, interconnections, and redundancies among cell death pathways that have been historically considered to be distinct [8]. Due to the molecular connections that have been found, IAV has emerged as an excellent model to study cell death.
Through the studies of IAV and cell death, the innate immune sensor Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) has been identified as the key upstream sensor that is activated in response to IAV infection to induce cell death [9]. Mechanistically, upon activation, ZBP1 assembles a PANoptosome complex through heterotypic and homotypic domain interactions that promotes activation of both kinase and proteolytic signaling cascades to drive inflammation and lytic cell death [9,10,11,12]. The ZBP1-PANoptosome induces a form of cell death called PANoptosis, which is an inflammatory, lytic, innate immune programmed cell death pathway driven by RIPKs and caspases and regulated by PANoptosomes [13]. Loss of individual cell death effectors fails to provide significant protection from IAV-induced cell death, highlighting the functional redundancy among cell death components downstream of PANoptosome formation; in contrast, deletion of the key upstream sensor ZBP1 or simultaneous loss of the core PANoptosome components receptor interacting serine/threonine kinase 3 (RIPK3) and caspase-8 (CASP8) can protect bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from IAV-induced PANoptosis [9].
While it is well-established that ZBP1 acts as an innate immune sensor of IAV infection to induce robust inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, in infected macrophages, the downstream events involved in executing ZBP1-dependent PANoptosis require further investigation [9,10,11,14,15,16]. Early studies have shown that IAV induces NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3)-dependent inflammasome activation and IL-1β and IL-18 maturation, but genetic deletion of NLRP3 fails to protect the cells from death [9]. Similarly, these studies have shown that IAV also induces mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) protein activation, which is generally indicative of necroptosis, but loss of MLKL fails to provide protection from IAV-induced cell death [9,12], suggesting this is not necroptosis. However, other reports showed that MLKL activation may instead act as a standalone mechanism, and loss of MLKL provides significant delay and protection from IAV-induced cell death and inflammasome activation [14,15,16,17]. Therefore, the role of MLKL in IAV-induced cell death remains unclear. To address these discrepancies, in this study, we investigated the role of MLKL in regulating IAV-induced cell death and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. We found that both IAV-induced cell death and NLRP3 inflammasome activation were fully independent of MLKL in macrophages. Furthermore, we observed IAV induced ZBP1-dependent, but RIPK3-independent PANoptosis at extended timepoints post-IAV infection in macrophages, suggesting that RIPK3 became redundant with other cell death molecules at later timepoints. Overall, our data clarify the role of MLKL in IAV-induced cell death and provide key insights for strategies to target cell death to limit IAV immunopathogenesis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mice
Zbp1−/− [18], Ripk3−/− [19], Ripk3−/−Casp8−/− [20], Mlkl−/− [21], and Nlrp3−/− [22] mice have been reported previously, and C57/BL6J control mice (WT) used in the current study were bred at the Animal Resources Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Mice were maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle and were fed standard chow. Animal studies were conducted under protocols approved by the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Committee on the Use and Care of Animals (IACUC protocol, #482).
2.2. Primary Macrophage Differentiation and Stimulation
Freshly isolated murine bone marrow cells were plated into three 150 mm tissue culture plates, each containing a total of 20 mL of macrophage differentiation medium (BMDM medium). BMDM medium was prepared by supplementing IMDM (12440053, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) with 30% L929 cell-conditioned medium, 10% heat inactivated (HI)-FBS, 1% nonessential amino acids (11140-050, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (15070-063, Thermo Fisher Scientific). An additional 5 mL of fresh BMDM medium was added to each plate on d 3 and 5 to provide better growth and differentiation conditions. The fully matured macrophages were collected and counted on d 6, followed by seeding at 106 cells per well in 12-well culture plates in DMEM containing 10% HI-FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin for the experimental stimulations on the following day. Infections were performed with IAV (20 moi) for the indicated timepoints, and the infected BMDMs were treated with the pharmacological MLKL inhibitor GW806742X (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA, 1 μM final concentration), or the RIPK1 inhibitor Nec1s (Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA, 25 μM final concentration), starting from 1 h post-infection, as detailed in the figure legends.
2.3. Virus Stock Preparation
The IAV (A/Puerto Rico/8/34, H1N1 [PR8]) was prepared as previously described [12] and propagated from 11-d-old embryonated chicken eggs by allantoic inoculation. The IAV titer was measured by plaque assay in Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells.
2.4. Western Blotting
The samples for Western blot analyses were prepared as described previously [23]. For caspase immunoblotting, the samples were prepared by combining the cell lysates with culture supernatants (lysis buffer: 5% NP-40 solution in water supplemented with 10 mM DTT and protease inhibitor solution at 1× final concentration). The lysate samples for immunoblot analysis of all other proteins were prepared by lysing the cells in RIPA buffer, without combining with the supernatants. All samples were mixed and denatured in loading buffer containing SDS and 100 mM DTT and boiled for 12 min. SDS-PAGE-separated proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (IPVH00010, Millipore, Burlington, NJ, USA) using the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ system. Immunoblotting was performed with primary antibodies against caspase-1 (AG-20B-0042; Adipogen, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:1000), caspase-3 (#9662, Cell Signaling Technology [CST], Danvers, MA, USA, 1:1000), cleaved caspase-3 (#9661, CST, 1:1000), caspase-7 (#9492, CST, 1:1000), cleaved caspase-7 (#9491, CST, 1:1000), caspase-8 (#4927, CST, 1:1000), cleaved caspase-8 (#8592, CST, 1:1000), GSDMD (ab209845, Abcam, Waltham, MA, USA, 1:1000), GSDME (ab19859, Abcam, 1:1000), pMLKL (#37333, CST, 1:1000), tMLKL (AP14242B, Abgent, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:1000), and β-Actin (sc-47778 HRP, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA, 1:5000). Appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse [315-035-047] and anti-rabbit [111-035-047], Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) were used as described previously [24]. Immunoblot images were acquired on an Amersham Imager using Immobilon® Forte Western HRP Substrate (WBLUF0500, Millipore).
2.5. Cell Death Analysis
As described previously [24], time course analyses of cell death were performed using a two-color IncuCyte S3/SX5 incubator imaging system. Fully differentiated BMDMs were seeded in 12-well (1.0 × 106 cells/well) or 24-well (0.5 × 106 cells/well) tissue culture plates in the presence of propidium iodide (PI) (P3566, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), which leaks into the dying cells and marks them as positive for lytic cell death. The cells were infected with IAV at 20 moi, as indicated in the figure legends. Time course image acquisition was carried out using the 20× objective, and the dead cells positive for PI-uptake were marked by the mask-application provided in the IncuCyte software modules S3 and SX5. A minimum of four images per well for each condition and timepoint were acquired for the quantitative studies. The dead cells positive for PI-uptake were pseudo-colored in red for the presentation of the original imaging data in the figures. The percent dead cell counts were plotted using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 software.
2.6. ELISA Analyses
The quantification of the secreted cytokines from the cell culture supernatants was performed as per the protocols provided by the commercial Milliplex kit supplier, Millipore (#MCYTOMAG-70K).
2.7. Statistical Analyses
GraphPad Prism version 8.0 and 9.0 software packages were used for data analyses. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test for two groups or a one-way ANOVA for two or more groups (Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test).
3. Results
3.1. Loss of Necroptosis Executioner MLKL Does Not Protect Macrophages from IAV-Induced Cell Death
ZBP1, also known as DAI (DNA-dependent activator of IFN regulatory factors), has emerged as the critical innate immune sensor of IAV infection [9]. Previous studies have demonstrated that activated ZBP1 serves as a master regulator of IAV-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis [9,10,12]. PANoptosis is a unique innate immune, lytic and inflammatory cell death pathway driven by caspases and RIPKs that is regulated by the multiprotein PANoptosome complex [25]. The IAV-induced ZBP1-PANoptosome contains several components, including RIPK3 and CASP8 [9,10,12]. Previous studies demonstrated that genetic deletion or inhibition of individual components of IAV-induced PANoptosis is not sufficient to rescue the cells from undergoing cell death [9,12]. However, contrasting reports have suggested the possibility that IAV-induced necroptosis may act as a standalone, non-redundant mechanism of cell death and inflammasome activation downstream of ZBP1-RIPK3 signaling [14,15,16,17], leaving the current state of IAV-induced cell death mechanisms unclear. To address this gap in our understanding, we sought to use macrophages as a model system to address the role of MLKL in IAV-induced cell death and inflammasome activation. Fully differentiated BMDMs from WT, Zbp1−/− (ZBP1 knockout (KO)), Ripk3−/− (RIPK3 KO), and Mlkl−/− (MLKL KO) mice were infected with IAV. Then the dynamics and magnitude of the cell death was monitored using IncuCyte-based live imaging analyses, where the dead cells were marked by PI (propidium iodide) dye uptake upon the loss of membrane integrity.
We observed that IAV-induced robust cell death in wild-type (WT) macrophages, and the genetic deletion of ZBP1 rescued the cells from IAV-induced cell death (Figure 1A,B). In contrast, we found that loss of RIPK3 provided partial protection from cell death and failed to phenocopy the ZBP1-deficient cells (Figure 1A,B); this contradicts the existing concept that the ZBP1-RIPK3 axis is the key for driving IAV-induced cell death [9,12,14,15,16]. Moreover, there were key differences between RIPK3-deficient cells and MLKL-deficient cells. The Mlkl−/− BMDMs showed similar cell death kinetics and magnitude to that of WT cells and failed to phenocopy the delay in cell death observed in Ripk3−/− BMDMs (Figure 1A,B). Together, these results suggest that IAV-induced cell death is dependent on ZBP1 but not MLKL or its upstream activating kinase RIPK3.
To provide an additional line of evidence to understand the roles of MLKL and RIPK3 in IAV-induced cell death, we next treated WT, ZBP1 KO, RIPK3 KO, and MLKL KO cells with the MLKL inhibitor (MLKLi, GW806742X), starting from 1 h post-IAV infection. Consistent with our results from gene-deficient BMDMs (Figure 1A,B), we found that MLKL inhibitor treatment did not affect the IAV-induced cell death in either WT BMDMs or other gene-deficient cells, indicating that MLKL inhibition did not block the IAV-induced cell death (Figure 1C,D). Furthermore, we used a complementary approach of inhibiting necroptosis using the well-established RIPK1 kinase inhibitor, necrostatin-1s (Nec1s). Treatment with Nec1s also did not block the IAV-induced cell death (Figure 1E,F). Together, these data demonstrated that ZBP1 is the master regulator of IAV-induced cell death in BMDMs and that RIPK3 partially contributes to this process. Moreover, our data demonstrate that MLKL is not required for IAV-induced cell death.
3.2. Loss of MLKL Does Not Protect Macrophages from IAV-Induced Biochemical Activation of PANoptosis
Real-time IncuCyte imaging analysis demonstrated that IAV induced robust ZBP1-dependent lytic cell death in BMDMs (Figure 1). Previous studies have established that the IAV-induced cell death modality can be biochemically characterized by the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome as well as caspases and RIPKs, which are biochemical features of PANoptosis [9,12]. However, contrasting reports have suggested that the IAV-induced activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and cell death molecules occur, at least in part, in a necroptosis-dependent manner [14,15,16,17]. Therefore, we next sought to address whether MLKL can also contribute to the inflammasome and PANoptosis molecule activation at the biochemical level in unprimed IAV-infected BMDMs. Using immunoblotting-based biochemical analyses, we observed IAV-induced PANoptosis in BMDMs at both 12 and 24 h post-infection, as indicated by activation of CASP1, gasdermin D (GSDMD) and GSDME, along with CASP8, CASP3, and CASP7, as well as MLKL (Figure 2A,B). Consistent with our cell death data (Figure 1), we found that the activation of these PANoptosis molecules was completely abrogated at 12 h post-infection in IAV-infected Zbp1−/− BMDMs, and we observed a similar phenotype in Ripk3−/−Casp8−/− BMDMs (Figure 2A). At the same early time of 12 h post-infection, the RIPK3 KO BMDMs started to diverge from the ZBP1 KO cells and began to show the activation of caspases and GSDMD and GSDME (Figure 2A). Furthermore, the immunoblotting data showed normal activation of CASP1 in Mlkl−/− cells, but CASP1 activation was fully abrogated in NLRP3 KO cells at this early timepoint (Figure 2A).
At 24 h post-IAV infection, we observed robust PANoptosis in WT BMDMs, which was substantially reduced in ZBP1-deficient cells, although not fully abrogated; this was in contrast to Ripk3−/−Casp8−/− BMDMs, where activation of the PANoptosis molecules was still fully inhibited at 24 h post-IAV infection (Figure 2B). At the same late time of 24 h post-infection, the Ripk3−/− BMDMs showed almost WT levels of activation of many PANoptosis molecules, consistent with the cell death phenotype we observed; however, Ripk3−/− BMDMs continued to show significantly reduced CASP1 and GSDMD activation at the 24 h timepoint (Figure 2B). We also observed MLKL activation that was independent of the ZBP1-RIPK3-axis that began to emerge at this late timepoint of 24 h post-IAV infection (Figure 2B), which suggests that the loss of cellular homeostasis and/or accumulation of cellular stress could lead to activation of other compensatory cell death pathways.
Additionally, loss of MLKL failed to block the activation of PANoptosis molecules, including activation of the inflammasome components CASP1 and GSDMD, both at 12 h and 24 h post-IAV infection (Figure 2A,B). Collectively, immunoblotting analyses demonstrated that ZBP1 is the master regulator of RIPK3-CASP8-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation and PANoptosis, whereas the downstream MLKL does not act as a standalone mechanism during IAV infection under non-priming conditions.
3.3. MLKL Is Not Required for IAV-Induced Inflammatory or Inflammasome-Dependent Cytokine Production
Since expression, activation, and release of soluble inflammatory mediators are key features of inflammatory cell death and PANoptosis [9,12], we next sought to address the role of MLKL and other PANoptosis regulators in cytokine secretion at 24 h post-IAV infection. Loss of ZBP1, NLRP3, RIPK3, and RIPK3 plus CASP8 proteins caused significant reductions in the release of the IAV-induced inflammasome-dependent cytokine interleukin (IL)-1β (IL-1β), but loss of MLKL failed to affect the levels of IL-1β produced (Figure 3A). Analyses of inflammasome-independent cytokines, including IL-6, TNF, and the chemokine KC (IL-8), also demonstrated that ZBP1, RIPK3, and CASP8 are required for the release of non-inflammasome cytokines, whereas NLRP3 and MLKL are generally not required for these processes during IAV infection (Figure 3B–D). Together, these results indicate that the ZBP1-RIPK3 axis, independent of MLKL, regulates inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, and the expression of inflammasome-independent inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, as well as inflammasome-dependent, CASP1-mediated cytokine secretion during IAV infection in BMDMs.
4. Discussion
In this study, we confirmed the previous findings that ZBP1 senses IAV in BMDMs and drives PANoptosis [9], and we found that this is partially dependent on RIPK3, but fully abrogated in Ripk3−/−Casp8−/− cells. Pharmacological inhibition or genetic deletion of MLKL did not result in either reduced cell death or decreased biochemical activation of the inflammasome or PANoptosis. These findings demonstrate that MLKL does not act as a standalone mechanism of cell death at phenotypic or biochemical levels during IAV infection in unprimed primary BMDMs. These results are important in the context of inflammasome-dependent inflammatory cytokine activation, which plays crucial roles in further amplification of innate immune responses and shaping adaptive immune responses [26]. Studies showing a critical protective role for the inflammasome [27], but not for MLKL [16,17,28], in IAV-infected animals further support the concept that MLKL is dispensable for the inflammasome’s protective functions during IAV infection in vivo. Our data support a model where loss of the RIPK3-MLKL axis is not sufficient to block IAV-induced inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion, and that ZBP1-mediated PANoptosis acts as a versatile host defense mechanism against IAV infection [9,10,12]. However, a recent study showed an independent role for MLKL in driving IAV-induced cell death and inflammasome activation, particularly early in the infection cycle, in the context of TLR priming [17]. Our data suggest that the phenotype observed in that study is dependent on TLR priming rather than on the viral infection. Additionally, a previous study suggested that GSDMD activation could be an upstream regulator of necroptosis by showing that mitochondrial-ROS can promote GSDMD activation in macrophages with the disease-associated gain-of-function allele Lrrk2G2019S (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2), which in turn acts as an upstream trigger driving MLKL-dependent necroptosis [29]. However, in our study, no such cross-regulation was observed in IAV-infected BMDMs, as we found normal activation of phosphorylated MLKL in Nlrp3−/− cells, despite the lack of GSDMD activation in those cells. Together, our findings suggest that necroptosis may be limited as a fail-safe mechanism of inflammatory cell death that is often activated upon CASP8 inactivation and may be a poor activator of inflammasome-dependent cytokines during IAV infection.
As with any other pathogen, innate immunity acts as the first line of defense against influenza infections. The viral infection of epithelial cells and macrophages triggers inflammatory cell death responses, which appear to be vital for viral clearance, but their uncontrolled or excessive activation can promote pathological tissue damage, leading to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like disease, which is responsible for respiratory and multiorgan failure and can even cause death of the infected patients [6,30]. It is increasingly clear that exaggerated activation of innate immune components is responsible for the development of severe lung damage. Therefore, these molecules are viable therapeutic targets to mitigate the pathology in combination with antiviral drugs [31,32,33]. However, caution is warranted, as it is essential to delineate the protective versus detrimental innate immune responses and develop specific targeting strategies to avoid uncontrolled viral replication [31,32,33]. Moreover, it is now clear that different strains of IAV differ in replication efficiencies and ability to evade the host anti-viral immune responses. For example, studies using the mouse adapted PR8 H1N1 strain have shown that it has high pathogenicity in vivo but reduced infectivity in macrophages compared to other IAV strains such as H3N2 and the seasonal H1N1 variants [34,35,36]. These observations are important in the context of avian and other zoonotic infections, as these strains represent emerging pathogenic IAV strains that are capable of infecting and replicating in human cells, with the potential to cause pandemics via human-to-human community transmissions and excessive activation of inflammatory immunopathology [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Together, these studies further support the concept that uncontrolled inflammation and viral replication are responsible for increased mortality and morbidity in cases of severe influenza, and other viral, infections. In line with these observations, the loss of receptors for the inflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-1 reduces lung inflammation and extends the survival of influenza-infected mice [44]. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that proinflammatory cytokines, especially TNF when combined with IFNγ, can trigger robust PANoptosis in various cell types, which also drives tissue damage and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infections [45,46,47,48,49]. In this regard, it is important for future studies to determine whether the highly pathogenic influenza strains are more like SARS-CoV-2 in their ability to evade the primary innate immune responses and induce activation of robust secondary inflammatory cytokine responses, leading to cytokine storms and the induction of detrimental PANoptosis.
Beyond the specific implications for influenza infections, ZBP1 has been found to be involved in other infections [46,50], and several genetic studies have demonstrated that activated PANoptosome components are often associated with hyperactivation of ZBP1 or inflammasome assembly and IL-1β secretion in diverse pathophysiological conditions [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. The sum of data from our group and others provides a compelling rationale for therapeutic targeting of ZBP1 as an improved strategy for modulating immune responses in the context of infectious and inflammatory disease conditions. Future research aimed at deciphering the intricate cross-regulatory mechanisms that activate complementary cell death modalities and identifying key upstream sensor molecules similar to ZBP1 may aid in the development of therapeutic agents with higher efficacy and minimal toxicity.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the members of the Kanneganti laboratory for their comments and suggestions during the development of this manuscript. We thank Rebecca Tweedell and Anu Sharma, for editing support, and Katie Combs and Lauren Kneeland for mouse colony support.
Author Contributions
R.K.S.M., B.R.S. and T.-D.K. designed the study. R.K.S.M., B.R.S., R.R.B., Y.W. and J.L. performed the experiments. R.K.S.M., B.R.S., R.R.B., Y.W., J.L. and T.-D.K. analyzed the data. R.K.S.M. and B.R.S. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. T.-D.K. oversaw the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
All experiments were performed with the approval of national/local authorities, and mouse studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol #482) of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated and presented in the current study are provided within the manuscript. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to thirumala-devi.kanneganti@stjude.org.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
Work from our laboratory is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (AI101935, AI124346, AI160179, AR056296 and CA253095 to T.-D.K.) and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (to T.-D.K.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Iuliano A.D., Roguski K.M., Chang H.H., Muscatello D.J., Palekar R., Tempia S., Cohen C., Gran J.M., Schanzer D., Cowling B.J., et al. Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: A modelling study. Lancet. 2018;391:1285–1300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33293-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karki R., Kanneganti T.D. The ‘cytokine storm’: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Trends Immunol. 2021;42:681–705. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2021.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kash J.C., Tumpey T.M., Proll S.C., Carter V., Perwitasari O., Thomas M.J., Basler C.F., Palese P., Taubenberger J.K., Garcia-Sastre A., et al. Genomic analysis of increased host immune and cell death responses induced by 1918 influenza virus. Nature. 2006;443:578–581. doi: 10.1038/nature05181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Laghlali G., Lawlor K.E., Tate M.D. Die Another Way: Interplay between Influenza A Virus, Inflammation and Cell Death. Viruses. 2020;12:401. doi: 10.3390/v12040401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schulert G.S., Zhang M., Fall N., Husami A., Kissell D., Hanosh A., Zhang K., Davis K., Jentzen J.M., Napolitano L., et al. Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Mutations in Genes Linked to Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis and Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Fatal Cases of H1N1 Influenza. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;213:1180–1188. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Short K.R., Kroeze E., Fouchier R.A.M., Kuiken T. Pathogenesis of influenza-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14:57–69. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70286-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang D., Zhu W., Yang L., Shu Y. The Epidemiology, Virology, and Pathogenicity of Human Infections with Avian Influenza Viruses. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2021;11:a038620. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pandian N., Kanneganti T.D. PANoptosis: A unique innate immune inflammatory cell death modality. J. Immunol. 2022;209:1625–1633. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuriakose T., Man S.M., Malireddi R.K., Karki R., Kesavardhana S., Place D.E., Neale G., Vogel P., Kanneganti T.D. ZBP1/DAI is an innate sensor of influenza virus triggering the NLRP3 inflammasome and programmed cell death pathways. Sci. Immunol. 2016;1:aag2045. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aag2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kesavardhana S., Kuriakose T., Guy C.S., Samir P., Malireddi R.K.S., Mishra A., Kanneganti T.D. ZBP1/DAI ubiquitination and sensing of influenza vRNPs activate programmed cell death. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:2217–2229. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zheng M., Kanneganti T.D. The regulation of the ZBP1-NLRP3 inflammasome and its implications in pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis) Immunol. Rev. 2020;297:26–38. doi: 10.1111/imr.12909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zheng M., Karki R., Vogel P., Kanneganti T.D. Caspase-6 Is a Key Regulator of Innate Immunity, Inflammasome Activation, and Host Defense. Cell. 2020;181:674–687 e613. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malireddi R.K.S., Kesavardhana S., Kanneganti T.D. ZBP1 and TAK1: Master Regulators of NLRP3 Inflammasome/Pyroptosis, Apoptosis, and Necroptosis (PAN-optosis) Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:406. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shubina M., Tummers B., Boyd D.F., Zhang T., Yin C., Gautam A., Guo X.J., Rodriguez D.A., Kaiser W.J., Vogel P., et al. Necroptosis restricts influenza A virus as a stand-alone cell death mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 2020;217:e20191259. doi: 10.1084/jem.20191259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thapa R.J., Ingram J.P., Ragan K.B., Nogusa S., Boyd D.F., Benitez A.A., Sridharan H., Kosoff R., Shubina M., Landsteiner V.J., et al. DAI senses influenza A virus genomic RNA and activates RIPK3-dependent cell death. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:674–681. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang T., Yin C., Boyd D.F., Quarato G., Ingram J.P., Shubina M., Ragan K.B., Ishizuka T., Crawford J.C., Tummers B., et al. Influenza Virus Z-RNAs Induce ZBP1-Mediated Necroptosis. Cell. 2020;180:1115–1129 e1113. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lei X., Chen Y., Lien E., Fitzgerald K.A. MLKL-Driven Inflammasome Activation and Caspase-8 Mediate Inflammatory Cell Death in Influenza A Virus Infection. mBio. 2023;14:e0011023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00110-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ishii K.J., Kawagoe T., Koyama S., Matsui K., Kumar H., Kawai T., Uematsu S., Takeuchi O., Takeshita F., Coban C., et al. TANK-binding kinase-1 delineates innate and adaptive immune responses to DNA vaccines. Nature. 2008;451:725–729. doi: 10.1038/nature06537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Newton K., Sun X., Dixit V.M. Kinase RIP3 is dispensable for normal NF-kappa Bs, signaling by the B-cell and T-cell receptors, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, and Toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004;24:1464–1469. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.4.1464-1469.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oberst A., Dillon C.P., Weinlich R., McCormick L.L., Fitzgerald P., Pop C., Hakem R., Salvesen G.S., Green D.R. Catalytic activity of the caspase-8-FLIP(L) complex inhibits RIPK3-dependent necrosis. Nature. 2011;471:363–367. doi: 10.1038/nature09852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murphy J.M., Czabotar P.E., Hildebrand J.M., Lucet I.S., Zhang J.G., Alvarez-Diaz S., Lewis R., Lalaoui N., Metcalf D., Webb A.I., et al. The pseudokinase MLKL mediates necroptosis via a molecular switch mechanism. Immunity. 2013;39:443–453. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanneganti T.D., Ozoren N., Body-Malapel M., Amer A., Park J.H., Franchi L., Whitfield J., Barchet W., Colonna M., Vandenabeele P., et al. Bacterial RNA and small antiviral compounds activate caspase-1 through cryopyrin/Nalp3. Nature. 2006;440:233–236. doi: 10.1038/nature04517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Malireddi R.K.S., Bynigeri R.R., Kancharana B., Sharma B.R., Burton A.R., Pelletier S., Kanneganti T.D. Determining distinct roles of IL-1alpha through generation of an IL-1alpha knockout mouse with no defect in IL-1beta expression. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1068230. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1068230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tweedell R.E., Malireddi R.K.S., Kanneganti T.D. A comprehensive guide to studying inflammasome activation and cell death. Nat. Protoc. 2020;15:3284–3333. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0374-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tweedell R.E., Kanneganti T.D. NLRP12-PANoptosome in haemolytic, infectious and inflammatory diseases. Clin. Transl. Med. 2023;13:e1409. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dinarello C.A. Overview of the IL-1 family in innate inflammation and acquired immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2018;281:8–27. doi: 10.1111/imr.12621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thomas P.G., Dash P., Aldridge J.R., Jr., Ellebedy A.H., Reynolds C., Funk A.J., Martin W.J., Lamkanfi M., Webby R.J., Boyd K.L., et al. The intracellular sensor NLRP3 mediates key innate and healing responses to influenza A virus via the regulation of caspase-1. Immunity. 2009;30:566–575. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nogusa S., Thapa R.J., Dillon C.P., Liedmann S., Oguin T.H., 3rd, Ingram J.P., Rodriguez D.A., Kosoff R., Sharma S., Sturm O., et al. RIPK3 Activates Parallel Pathways of MLKL-Driven Necroptosis and FADD-Mediated Apoptosis to Protect against Influenza A Virus. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Weindel C.G., Martinez E.L., Zhao X., Mabry C.J., Bell S.L., Vail K.J., Coleman A.K., VanPortfliet J.J., Zhao B., Wagner A.R., et al. Mitochondrial ROS promotes susceptibility to infection via gasdermin D-mediated necroptosis. Cell. 2022;185:3214–3231 e3223. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Denney L., Ho L.P. The role of respiratory epithelium in host defence against influenza virus infection. Biomed. J. 2018;41:218–233. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Beigel J.H., Farrar J., Han A.M., Hayden F.G., Hyer R., de Jong M.D., Lochindarat S., Nguyen T.K., Nguyen T.H., Tran T.H., et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:1374–1385. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ramos I., Fernandez-Sesma A. Modulating the Innate Immune Response to Influenza A Virus: Potential Therapeutic Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:361. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tang B.M., Craig J.C., Eslick G.D., Seppelt I., McLean A.S. Use of corticosteroids in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37:1594–1603. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819fb507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tate M.D., Pickett D.L., van Rooijen N., Brooks A.G., Reading P.C. Critical role of airway macrophages in modulating disease severity during influenza virus infection of mice. J. Virol. 2010;84:7569–7580. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00291-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tate M.D., Schilter H.C., Brooks A.G., Reading P.C. Responses of mouse airway epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages to virulent and avirulent strains of influenza A virus. Viral Immunol. 2011;24:77–88. doi: 10.1089/vim.2010.0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Taylor R.M. Experimental Infection with Influenza a Virus in Mice: The Increase in Intrapulmonary Virus after Inoculation and the Influence of Various Factors Thereon. J. Exp. Med. 1941;73:43–55. doi: 10.1084/jem.73.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de Jong M.D., Simmons C.P., Thanh T.T., Hien V.M., Smith G.J., Chau T.N., Hoang D.M., Chau N.V., Khanh T.H., Dong V.C., et al. Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia. Nat. Med. 2006;12:1203–1207. doi: 10.1038/nm1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gao R., Cao B., Hu Y., Feng Z., Wang D., Hu W., Chen J., Jie Z., Qiu H., Xu K., et al. Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1888–1897. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Girard M.P., Tam J.S., Assossou O.M., Kieny M.P. The 2009 A (H1N1) influenza virus pandemic: A review. Vaccine. 2010;28:4895–4902. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kandeil A., Patton C., Jones J.C., Jeevan T., Harrington W.N., Trifkovic S., Seiler J.P., Fabrizio T., Woodard K., Turner J.C., et al. Rapid evolution of A(H5N1) influenza viruses after intercontinental spread to North America. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:3082. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38415-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Medina R.A., Garcia-Sastre A. Influenza A viruses: New research developments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:590–603. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Su S., Gu M., Liu D., Cui J., Gao G.F., Zhou J., Liu X. Epidemiology, Evolution, and Pathogenesis of H7N9 Influenza Viruses in Five Epidemic Waves since 2013 in China. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:713–728. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Van Kerkhove M.D. Brief literature review for the WHO global influenza research agenda--highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 risk in humans. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses. 2013;7((Suppl. 2)):26–33. doi: 10.1111/irv.12077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Perrone L.A., Szretter K.J., Katz J.M., Mizgerd J.P., Tumpey T.M. Mice lacking both TNF and IL-1 receptors exhibit reduced lung inflammation and delay in onset of death following infection with a highly virulent H5N1 virus. J. Infect. Dis. 2010;202:1161–1170. doi: 10.1086/656365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Karki R., Kanneganti T.D. PANoptosome signaling and therapeutic implications in infection: Central role for ZBP1 to activate the inflammasome and PANoptosis. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2023;83:102348. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2023.102348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Karki R., Lee S., Mall R., Pandian N., Wang Y., Sharma B.R., Malireddi R.S., Yang D., Trifkovic S., Steele J.A., et al. ZBP1-dependent inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, and cytokine storm disrupt IFN therapeutic efficacy during coronavirus infection. Sci. Immunol. 2022;7:eabo6294. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abo6294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Karki R., Sharma B.R., Tuladhar S., Williams E.P., Zalduondo L., Samir P., Zheng M., Sundaram B., Banoth B., Malireddi R.K.S., et al. Synergism of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma Triggers Inflammatory Cell Death, Tissue Damage, and Mortality in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Cytokine Shock Syndromes. Cell. 2021;184:149–168 e117. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Malireddi R.K.S., Karki R., Sundaram B., Kancharana B., Lee S., Samir P., Kanneganti T.D. Inflammatory Cell Death, PANoptosis, Mediated by Cytokines in Diverse Cancer Lineages Inhibits Tumor Growth. Immunohorizons. 2021;5:568–580. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2100059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Simpson D.S., Pang J., Weir A., Kong I.Y., Fritsch M., Rashidi M., Cooney J.P., Davidson K.C., Speir M., Djajawi T.M., et al. Interferon-gamma primes macrophages for pathogen ligand-induced killing via a caspase-8 and mitochondrial cell death pathway. Immunity. 2022;55:423–441.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Banoth B., Tuladhar S., Karki R., Sharma B.R., Briard B., Kesavardhana S., Burton A., Kanneganti T.D. ZBP1 promotes fungi-induced inflammasome activation and pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis) J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:18276–18283. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cuchet-Lourenco D., Eletto D., Wu C., Plagnol V., Papapietro O., Curtis J., Ceron-Gutierrez L., Bacon C.M., Hackett S., Alsaleem B., et al. Biallelic RIPK1 mutations in humans cause severe immunodeficiency, arthritis, and intestinal inflammation. Science. 2018;361:810–813. doi: 10.1126/science.aar2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Duong B.H., Onizawa M., Oses-Prieto J.A., Advincula R., Burlingame A., Malynn B.A., Ma A. A20 restricts ubiquitination of pro-interleukin-1beta protein complexes and suppresses NLRP3 inflammasome activity. Immunity. 2015;42:55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jiao H., Wachsmuth L., Kumari S., Schwarzer R., Lin J., Eren R.O., Fisher A., Lane R., Young G.R., Kassiotis G., et al. Z-nucleic-acid sensing triggers ZBP1-dependent necroptosis and inflammation. Nature. 2020;580:391–395. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2129-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lehle A.S., Farin H.F., Marquardt B., Michels B.E., Magg T., Li Y., Liu Y., Ghalandary M., Lammens K., Hollizeck S., et al. Intestinal Inflammation and Dysregulated Immunity in Patients With Inherited Caspase-8 Deficiency. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:275–278. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li Y., Fuhrer M., Bahrami E., Socha P., Klaudel-Dreszler M., Bouzidi A., Liu Y., Lehle A.S., Magg T., Hollizeck S., et al. Human RIPK1 deficiency causes combined immunodeficiency and inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:970–975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813582116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lin J., Kumari S., Kim C., Van T.M., Wachsmuth L., Polykratis A., Pasparakis M. RIPK1 counteracts ZBP1-mediated necroptosis to inhibit inflammation. Nature. 2016;540:124–128. doi: 10.1038/nature20558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Newton K., Wickliffe K.E., Maltzman A., Dugger D.L., Strasser A., Pham V.C., Lill J.R., Roose-Girma M., Warming S., Solon M., et al. RIPK1 inhibits ZBP1-driven necroptosis during development. Nature. 2016;540:129–133. doi: 10.1038/nature20559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Polykratis A., Martens A., Eren R.O., Shirasaki Y., Yamagishi M., Yamaguchi Y., Uemura S., Miura M., Holzmann B., Kollias G., et al. A20 prevents inflammasome-dependent arthritis by inhibiting macrophage necroptosis through its ZnF7 ubiquitin-binding domain. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:731–742. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0324-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schwarzer R., Jiao H., Wachsmuth L., Tresch A., Pasparakis M. FADD and Caspase-8 Regulate Gut Homeostasis and Inflammation by Controlling MLKL- and GSDMD-Mediated Death of Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Immunity. 2020;52:978–993 e976. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vande Walle L., Van Opdenbosch N., Jacques P., Fossoul A., Verheugen E., Vogel P., Beyaert R., Elewaut D., Kanneganti T.D., van Loo G., et al. Negative regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by A20 protects against arthritis. Nature. 2014;512:69–73. doi: 10.1038/nature13322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang R., Li H., Wu J., Cai Z.Y., Li B., Ni H., Qiu X., Chen H., Liu W., Yang Z.H., et al. Gut stem cell necroptosis by genome instability triggers bowel inflammation. Nature. 2020;580:386–390. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated and presented in the current study are provided within the manuscript. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to thirumala-devi.kanneganti@stjude.org.