Skip to main content
Injury Prevention logoLink to Injury Prevention
. 1995 Sep;1(3):177–181. doi: 10.1136/ip.1.3.177

The New Zealand graduated driver licensing system: teenagers' attitudes towards and experiences with this car driver licensing system.

D J Begg 1, J D Langley 1, A I Reeder 1, D J Chalmers 1
PMCID: PMC1067588  PMID: 9346022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the attitudes of teenagers towards the New Zealand graduated driver licensing system (GDLS), and the extent to which it affected them. METHOD: Teenagers, who are members of a longitudinal study of a birth cohort, were interviewed at 15 years of age when the GDLS was first introduced and before they had begun licensure, and again at 18 years of age after they had experience with this licensing system. RESULTS: At both ages the majority (over 70%) agreed with the driving restrictions imposed by this system. After experience with the restrictions, however, significantly more reported being affected a lot by them, than had expected to be at age 15. This was especially true of the restrictions on the carrying of passengers and the night time curfew (10 pm - 5 am). However, few reported that they were affected by the alcohol restriction. Sixty eight per cent of those with a graduated licence reported breaking at least one of the conditions, most frequently carrying passengers. Very few were penalised by the police for this. CONCLUSIONS: Generally these young drivers were positively disposed towards the driving restrictions, but noncompliance was common. A full evaluation of all aspects of this licensing system is recommended.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jonah B. A. Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1986 Aug;18(4):255–271. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90041-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Robertson L. S. Patterns of teenaged driver involvement in fatal motor vehicle crashes: implications for policy choice. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1981 Summer;6(2):303–314. doi: 10.1215/03616878-6-2-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Silva P. A. The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: a 15 year longitudinal study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;4(1):76–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1990.tb00621.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Williams A. F. Fatal motor vehicle crashes involving teenagers. Pediatrician. 1983;12(1):37–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Williams A. F. Nighttime driving and fatal crash involvement of teenagers. Accid Anal Prev. 1985 Feb;17(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(85)90002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams A. F., Preusser D. F., Lund A. K. High school students' views of laws restricting teenage driving. J Public Health Policy. 1984 Sep;5(3):387–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES