Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1998 Sep;64(9):3539–3543. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.9.3539-3543.1998

Diversity of Frankia Strains in Root Nodules of Plants from the Families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae

Michael L Clawson 1, Margarita Carú 2, David R Benson 1,*
PMCID: PMC106764  PMID: 9726914

Abstract

Partial 16S ribosomal DNAs (rDNAs) were PCR amplified and sequenced from Frankia strains living in root nodules of plants belonging to the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae, including Colletia hystrix, Elaeagnus angustifolia, an unidentified Elaeagnus sp., Talguenea quinquenervia, and Trevoa trinervis. Nearly full-length 16S rDNAs were sequenced from strains of Frankia living in nodules of Ceanothus americanus, C. hystrix, Coriaria arborea, and Trevoa trinervis. Partial sequences also were obtained from Frankia strains isolated and cultured from the nodules of C. hystrix, Discaria serratifolia, D. trinervis, Retanilla ephedra, T. quinquenervia, and T. trinervis (Rhamnaceae). Comparison of these sequences and other published sequences of Frankia 16S rDNA reveals that the microsymbionts and isolated strains from the two plant families form a distinct phylogenetic clade, except for those from C. americanus. All sequences in the clade have a common 2-base deletion compared with other Frankia strains. Sequences from C. americanus nodules lack the deletion and cluster with Frankia strains infecting plants of the family Rosaceae. Published plant phylogenies (based on chloroplast rbcL sequences) group the members of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae together in the same clade. Thus, with the exception of C. americanus, actinorhizal plants of these families and their Frankia microsymbionts share a common symbiotic origin.


Nitrogen-fixing symbionts belonging to the actinomycete genus Frankia inhabit root nodules of woody dicots from eight families of angiosperms (3). The plants colonize soils during the early stages of plant succession (2, 3, 38). Representatives of these “actinorhizal” plants are distributed on every continent, except Antarctica (2). Although some actinorhizal plants are found in tropical and subarctic regions, most species inhabit temperate zones. They grow in a variety of environments, including range lands, bogs, sand dunes, salt marsh borders, xeric chaparral, alpine regions, alluvial regions, and arctic tundra (2, 3, 31).

Actinorhizal plants and legumes, together with many nonnodulating plants comprise a N2-fixing clade of the Rosid I lineage as assessed by phylogenetic analyses of the gene encoding the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rbcL) (33, 35, 36). The identification of this clade has led to the suggestion that plants of this lineage are genetically predisposed to form N2-fixing root nodules (33); it also has raised questions about the specificity between actinorhizal plants and Frankia microsymbionts and the degree to which actinorhizal plants and their microsymbionts may have coevolved. Coevolution can be viewed as a “stepwise reciprocal selective response” (14), in which evolutionary changes in one symbiont have selected for compensatory evolutionary changes in the other symbiont. Analyses of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences have shown that Frankia sp. strains generally cluster in host plant-specificity groups, yielding the impression that the symbionts have coevolved to a degree (4, 12, 19, 26). If so, then the path and extent of coevolution are not straightforward. For example, some Frankia strains infect plants from families other than the original host plant family (3, 20, 39), and some microsymbionts in root nodules have 16S rDNA signatures that belong to strains considered to infect plant families from outside the expected family (22a, 29).

Several 16S rDNA sequences of Frankia isolated from nodules of members of the family Elaeagnaceae are available, but, except for Ceanothus sp. (22, 30), members of the family Rhamnaceae have been neglected. Repeated attempts to isolate infective and effective Frankia strains from Ceanothus sp. root nodules have failed, leading to the notion that such Frankia strains are noncultivatable or require unidentified growth factors or specialized growth conditions (3). Many nodulated members of the family Rhamnaceae are found only in South America, especially in Chile, and are confined to the semiarid region of central Chile as part of the xerophytic matorral (32). These plants have yielded Frankia strains quite readily, suggesting that different groups of Frankia may predominate in different genera of rhamnaceous plants (711).

To determine the diversity and relationships among Frankia that infect members of the family Rhamnaceae, we isolated and sequenced partial and full-length 16S rDNAs from Frankia microsymbionts living in root nodules of members of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae, particularly those from Chile. In addition, 16S rDNA sequences were obtained from cultures of Frankia isolated from root nodules of rhamnaceous plants. These sequences were compared to published Frankia 16S rDNA sequences in a phylogenetic analysis.

Table 1 lists the sources of root nodules and strains used in this study. Root nodules were obtained from plants, washed, and suspended in 95% ethanol. Nodules were stored at −20°C until they were processed for DNA isolation.

TABLE 1.

Sources of sequences used in this study

Source of nodule or Frankia strain Location GenBank accession no. Source or reference
Elaeagnaceae
Elaeagnus angustifolia isolate Ea1-2 Ecully, France L40618 16
Elaeagnus angustifolia noda Willington, Conn. AF064144 This study
Elaeagnus sp. nod University of Chile, Santiago (nursery) AF064145 This study
Elaeagnus pungens nod Hamilton, New Zealand U82099 12
Shepherdia canadensis isolate SCN10a Cap-aux Oies, Quebec, Canada L40619 21
Hippophae rhamnoides isolate HR27-14 Foncouverte, France L40617 16
Rhamnaceae
Ceanothus americanus nod Willington, Conn. AF063639 This study
Ceanothus griseus nod Palmerston North, New Zealand (greenhouse) U54608 4
Colletia hystrix nod El Romeral, Santiago, Chile AF063640 This study
Colletia hystrix isolate ChI5 Caleu, Santiago, Chile AF064148 This study
Discaria toumatou nod Canterbury, New Zealand U54609 4
Discaria serratifolia isolate Ds12B Conception, Chile AF064149 This study
Discaria trinervis isolate DtI2 Bariloche, Argentina AF064146 This study
Retanilla ephedra isolate ReI6 Cuesta La Dormida, Santiago, Chile AF064150 This study
Talguenea quinquenervia nod Santiago, Chile AF063643 This study
Talguenea quinquenervia isolate TqI15 Rio Clarillo, Santiago, Chile AF064147 This study
Trevoa trinervis nod (n = 2) Santiago, Chile AF063644 This study
Trevoa trinervis nod Santiago, Chile AF063642 This study
Trevoa trinervis isolate TtI1 Las Vertientes, Santiago, Chile AF064151 This study
Betulaceae
Alnus rubra isolate ArI4 United States L11307 Unpublished
Alnus cordata isolate AcoN24d Canada L40610 26
Alnus rugosa isolate ARgP5 Quebec City, Canada L40612 26
Alnus crispa isolate AcN14a Tadoussac, Canada M88466 18
Alnus rugosa Sp+ nod Trois-Rivieres, Canada L40956 26
Casuarinaceae; Casuarina equisetifolia isolate CeD Senegal M55343 25
Myricaceae; Myrica nagi nod Lawjinrew, Meghalaya, India L40622 26
Coriariaceae; Coriaria arborea nod Mt. Tarawera, New Zealand AF063641 This study
Rosaceae
Purshia tridentata nod Palmerston North, New Zealand (greenhouse) U54611 4
Dryas drummondii nod Gaspé, Canada L40616 26
Other
Purshia tridentata isolate PtI1 Wyoming L41048 26
Ceanothus caeruleus isolate Cea1.3 Santo Tomás Atzinco, Mexico U72717 30
Ceanothus caeruleus isolate Cea5.1 Santo Tomás Atzinco, Mexico U72718 30
Streptomyces ambofaciens M27245 28
a

nod, obtained from a nodule. 

The procedures used for dissecting nodules, isolating DNA, and obtaining PCR products have been described previously (4). Nodules were rinsed thoroughly on a nylon mesh with a stream of cold tap water. Single lobes were dissected while being viewed with a dissecting microscope in 0.5 ml of sterile, freshly made TEA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM Na2 EDTA, 20 mM ascorbic acid [pH 7.6]) plus solid polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP [10 mg/ml]). Once the lobe periderm had been removed, the nodule was rinsed in two additional 0.5-ml drops of TEA buffer with PVPP. The nodule was placed in a third drop of TEA buffer with PVPP, and the lobes were macerated with a sterile scalpel and forceps. Vesicle clusters were collected, and DNA was extracted as described previously by Benson et al. (4).

Frankia strains in culture were stored as mycelia suspended in 95% ethanol at −20°C. A loopful of the mycelia was suspended in 100 μl of Tris-EDTA and 100 μl of 0.2 N NaOH–1% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate. The suspension was boiled, and DNA was precipitated in a manner identical to that described above.

Frankia 16S rDNA was amplified by PCR in 150-μl reaction mixtures consisting of the following: 12 μl of DNA template; 0.2 μM universal primer fD1 (40); 0.2 μM primer rDB1 (4); 200 μM (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 2.5 mM MgCl2; 3.75 U of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, Conn.); 100 μM sterile bovine albumin (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo.); 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3); and 50 mM KCl. The primers fD1 and rDB1 flank positions 28 to 419 on the Escherichia coli 16S rDNA and avoid amplification of plastid 16S rDNA that usually is present in the microsymbiont suspensions (4).

The PCR was done in a Perkin-Elmer model 2400 thermal cycler under the following conditions: primary denaturation at 95°C for two min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 57°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. After 35 cycles, the reaction mixtures were held at 72°C for 7 min, and the thermal cycling was terminated. Following the PCR, the samples were centrifuged for 5 min to pellet precipitated albumin, and the supernatant was placed in a new microcentrifuge tube. Ten-microliter portions of the PCR products were analyzed on a horizontal 1.5% (wt/vol) FMC (Rockland, Maine) agarose gel to check for the presence of a single band corresponding to the expected size of the product. The amplicons were purified on a Qiagen (Chatsworth, Calif.) column (PCR purification kit) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA in the eluted samples was quantified with a DyNA Quant 200 DNA fluorometer (Hoefer Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.).

Full-length microsymbiont 16S rDNA amplicons for Ceanothus americanus, Colletia hystrix, Coriaria arborea, and Trevoa trinervis were obtained by PCR in a final volume of 50 μl with 4 μl of Frankia DNA serving as template under the conditions described above. For this reaction, the universal primers fD1 and rD1 were used to amplify almost the entire 16S rDNA gene (40). To remove plastid DNA, 16 μl of the amplified Frankia-plastid 16S rDNA reaction mixture was digested for 1 h at 37°C with PvuII, which cleaves plastid but not Frankia 16S rDNA. Two microliters of this reaction mixture was then used as a template (in triplicate) for a second series of three 50-μl PCRs with the primers fD1 and rD1 (40). The three completed PCRs were combined, the mixtures were centrifuged for 5 min at 13,500 × g, and the supernatant was saved. The DNA was purified with a Qiagen column and quantitated.

The purified amplicons were cycle sequenced and analyzed with an Applied Biosystems (ABI) Prizm sequencer (Perkin-Elmer) with an ABI cycle sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer) with 2 pmol of primer and 100 fmol (ratio of 20:1) of double-stranded DNA. For short amplicons, sequencing was conducted in both directions with primers binding in the middle of the template and at both ends. For the longer Frankia 16S rDNA amplified from root nodules, sequencing was done in both directions with primers spaced about every 300 bp.

Sequences were aligned by using the Genetics Computer Group Pileup program and ClustalW (13, 37). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by using the programs in PHYLIP (neighbor joining) (15) and PUZZLE (maximum likelihood) (34). The trees were drawn with the program TREEVIEW (27).

To minimize the sequencing necessary to place nodule microsymbionts in a Frankia strain group, we amplified a portion of the 16S rRNA gene that provided a balance between sequence variability and length. Preliminary work with published and unpublished sequences showed that the 378-bp region proximal to the 5′ terminus (corresponding to E. coli positions 28 to 419, between primers) had about 45% of the total variable sites among Frankia strains, with the remainder found in the 1,100-bp 3′ fragment. We reasoned that if sequences from different nodules were identical in the short region, then differences in the remainder of the molecule would be unlikely to place an unknown strain in another clade. This approach was confirmed by using nearly full-length amplicons from some of the same nodules.

We obtained a total of 15 sequences. They were amplified from six nodules and six isolated strains of Frankia from six of the eight actinorhizal genera in the family Rhamnaceae, two nodules from Elaeagnus sp. (Elaeagnaceae), and one nodule from Coriaria arborea (Coriariaceae). Published sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis were from strains that infect each genus in the family Elaeagnaceae (Elaeagnus, Hippophaë, and Shepherdia) and from other Frankia strains. An alignment of Frankia 16S rDNAs showed that with the exception of microsymbionts from Ceanothus americanus and Ceanothus griseus, all microsymbionts and isolates examined from the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae had a signature 2-base deletion at positions 50 and 51 (between primers) compared to other Frankia sequences available (data not shown).

The overall diversity of Frankia strains that infect members of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae is likely to be low, since identical sequences were commonly obtained from nodules and strains. Sequence 1 (Fig. 1) is found in nodules from Elaeagnus angustifolia (accession no. AFO64144 in Table 1; Willington, Conn.), E. pungens (U82099; Hamilton, New Zealand), an Elaeagnus sp. growing in Chile (AF064145), and Trevoa trinervis (AF063644; Santiago, Chile). In cultured strains, sequence 1 is in Ea1-2 from E. angustifolia and HR27-14 from Hippophaë rhamnoides, both members of the family Elaeagnaceae that were originally isolated in France (16), and DtI2 from Discaria trinervis (Bariloche, Argentina) and TqI15 from Talguenea quinquenervia (Río Clarillo, Chile), both members of the family Rhamnaceae (8).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Neighbor-joining phylogram for Frankia 16S rDNA. Sequences were aligned by using ClustalW. The aligned sequences were then analyzed by using PHYLIP. Asterisks denote sequences obtained in this study. Sequence 1 was found in the nodule inhabitants of Elaeagnus angustifolia, Elaeagnus pungens, an unidentified Elaeagnus species, and Trevoa trinervis (accession no. AF064144, U82099, AF064145, and AF063644, respectively) and from the Frankia sp. strain DtI2, Ea1-2, HR27-14, and TqI15 (accession no. AF064146, L40618, L40617, AF064147, respectively). Sequence 2 was from microsymbionts in a Colletia hystrix nodule and the isolates ChI5, Ds12B, ReI6, and TtI1 (accession no. AF063640, AF064148, AF064149, AF064150, and AF064151, respectively). Sequence 3 was found in the root nodule inhabitants from Ceanothus griseus, Dryas drummondii, and Purshia tridentata (accession no. U54608, L40616, and U54611, respectively). The Streptomyces ambofaciens sequence was used to root the tree. Bootstrap values are shown as percent of 400 replicates. The bootstrapped samples were used to generate 400 distance matrices by using DNADIST. The assumptions made to construct the distance matrices were those of a Kimura two-parameter model with transversions weighted twice as heavily as transitions. Neighbor-joining trees were then constructed from the distance matrices by using NEIGHBOR. A consensus tree was found by using CONSENSE and viewed with TREEVIEW.

Sequence 2 (Fig. 1), which differs from sequence 1 at only one position in the 378-bp fragment, is found in microsymbionts in nodules of Colletia hystrix (AFO63640; Santiago, Chile) and the isolated strains ChI5 from C. hystrix (Santiago), Ds12B from Discaria serratifolia (Conception, Chile), ReI6 from Retanilla ephedra (Santiago), and TtI1 from T. trinervis (Santiago). This lack of diversity is noteworthy in view of the wide geographic distribution of the nodules and strains analyzed. Low diversity in Frankia 16S rDNA sequences has previously been reported for lineages that infect Coriaria species (Coriariaceae) and members of the family Rosaceae plus Ceanothus (4, 12, 24).

Variability of 16S rDNA sequences among microsymbionts that infect plants from the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae, excluding the microsymbionts of Ceanothus americanus, occurs at six sites within the 378-bp fragment. The sequences in microsymbionts from C. americanus root nodules are quite different; they differ at 15 sites from the collective sequences of strains or microsymbionts of all genera of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae examined and lack the 2-base deletion typical of sequences from strains infecting plants in these families.

To identify additional variable sites among strains in nodules from the Elaeagnaceae-Rhamnaceae group, we sequenced most of the 16S rRNA gene (1,395 nucleotides) from microsymbionts infecting Ceanothus americanus, Colletia hystrix, and Trevoa trinervis. The total variability among five widely collected sequences from the elaeagnus group of Frankia, including those from rhamnaceous plants, occurs at only 14 sites, with 6 sites (43%) located in the first 378 bp. The total variability of C. americanus with respect to all the elaeagnus sequences occurs at 34 sites, including the 2-bp deletion. As sequences from more nodules become available, additional variability will no doubt be observed, but based on the short and long sequences that have been reported here and elsewhere, the depth of the diversity within the elaeagnus group of Frankia seems likely to remain shallow.

The presence of identical Frankia 16S rDNA sequences in plants of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae supports the observation that species of Elaeagnus and Hippophaë (Elaeagnaceae) can be nodulated by isolates from Colletia sp. (Rhamnaceae) (17). Our findings also support the results of phylogenetic analyses of strains infective of Elaeagnus (isolated from genera of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae) that indicated monophyly among the isolates (23). The only exceptions found to monophyly in this group are the microsymbionts in C. americanus and C. griseus. Microsymbionts in these nodules appear to be related to Frankia sp. strains found so far only in rosaceous actinorhizal plants.

Six isolates used in this study (ChI5, Ds12B, DtI2, ReI6, TqI15, and TtI1) have been phenotypically characterized and differ in some traits, such as physiology, sporulation qualities, resistance to antibiotics, and others (6, 8, 9, 11). Despite having similar 16S rDNA sequences, strain ReI6 grows well on sucrose, whereas TtI1 grows better with pyruvate than with sucrose (6). Also, the strains exhibit some polymorphism in their electrophoretic patterns of esterases, diaphorase, and malate dehydrogenase (unpublished). Thus, strains having identical partial sequences may differ in minor physiological properties. A more precise resolution of strain diversity could be achieved by using a more rapidly evolving semantide for analysis.

A phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rDNAs was done by using sequences from the organisms listed in Table 1. Both neighbor-joining (PHYLIP) (15) and maximum likelihood (PUZZLE) (34) (not shown) were used to derive phylogenetic trees. Both methods clustered sequences from microsymbionts that nodulate plants in the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae. However, sequences from C. americanus and C. griseus formed a separate clade together with strains that inhabit nodules from members of the families Coriariaceae and Rosaceae (Fig. 1). The topology of the tree is similar to those published in previous studies (4, 12, 19, 26). Consistent features of such trees include the clustering of strains from Alnus sp. (Betulaceae) with those from Casuarina sp. (Casuarinaceae) and Myrica nagi (Myricaceae) and the distant placement of strains PtI1, Cea5.1, and Cea1.3, all Nod Fix isolates that form a clade of Frankia-like actinomycetes that are sometimes isolated from actinorhizal nodules. Cea5.1 and Cea1.3 were isolated as cosymbionts with an effective symbiont in Ceanothus caerulus root nodules (30).

To determine if longer 16S rDNA sequences would yield trees with a similar topology, we constructed trees by using published 16S rDNA sequences plus the nearly full-length sequences from the microsymbionts of C. americanus, Colletia hystrix, and Trevoa trinervis. In addition, we sequenced the 16S rDNA gene from Coriaria arborea (Coriariaceae). The resulting neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 2) has virtually the same topology as that shown in Fig. 1, with the exception that the bootstrap values are higher. The sequences from T. trinervis and C. hystrix again clustered with those from Frankia strains that infect members of the family Elaeagnaceae (Elaeagnus, Hippophaë, and Shepherdia). Also in agreement with Fig. 1, the nearest neighbor of the C. americanus microsymbiont was the sequence found in nodules of Dryas drummondii (Rosaceae) followed by the microsymbiont from Coriaria arborea (Coriariaceae).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Neighbor-joining cladogram for nearly full-length Frankia 16S rDNA. Sequences were aligned by using ClustalW. The aligned sequences were analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

A previous study using partial 16S rDNA sequences from a variable region different from those used here suggested that Ceanothus sp., like others from the family Rhamnaceae, select Frankia strains belonging to the elaeagnus group (22). To address this apparent conflict, we constructed phylogenetic trees (not shown) based on the sequences used by Murry et al. (22) plus the C. americanus sequence. In agreement with Murry et al., their sequences clustered closer to the elaeagnus Frankia strains than to the rosaceous Frankia strains (not shown). However, the C. americanus sequences still clustered with those from rosaceous plants. Another recent study that used full-length 16S rRNA genes amplified from root nodules of Ceanothus caeruleus showed that effective Frankia strains within those nodules had a short sequence that was identical to that found in C. griseus nodules and a long sequence having only four differences from the inhabitant of Dryas drummondii (Rosaceae) root nodules (30). The overall diversity of Frankia strains that inhabit Ceanothus nodules is therefore not clear at present, because different studies have analyzed different species. To resolve this issue, a more in-depth study of more species within this one genus is necessary.

The close relationship between Frankia strains that infect most plants belonging to the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae suggests that the last common ancestor of both families was nodulated by Frankia strains similar to those currently occupying the nodules. Actinorhizal plants from both families comprise a monophyletic lineage within the N2-fixing clade (based on rbcL sequences) (33, 35, 36) and have similar fossil pollen records. Both first appear in the Oligocene epoch of the Tertiary period (about 31 million years ago). The low diversity of Frankia strains in these nodules, compared to that of strains infecting plants from the families Betulaceae and Myricaceae, for example, may reflect the relatively recent divergence of this group of actinorhizal plants.

Although plants of the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae permit infection primarily by a defined group of Frankia strains, the elaeagnus group, strong conclusions about the degree to which these plants restrict the entry of other strains that normally infect other plants must await a more extensive sampling of individual species. The importance of conducting such studies is underscored by reports showing that plants such as E. angustifolia can be quite promiscuous in accepting Frankia strains when tested in the laboratory (1). The degree to which such promiscuity occurs in the field is unknown.

From the perspective of the microsymbiont, one cannot conclude that the elaeagnus group of Frankia strains specialize in infecting only plants in the families Rhamnaceae and Elaeagnaceae. In fact, Frankia strains from the elaeagnus group can nodulate some plants in the family Casuarinaceae, in particular, Gymnostoma sp., in which elaeagnus strains appear to be the primary microsymbionts (22a). Elaeagnus strains have also been shown to infect members of the families Betulaceae (5) and Myricaceae (39) in the laboratory. The situation in the field, in which competitive interactions are more intense, has not been addressed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant 95-37305-2230 from the USDA National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program (USDA-NRICGP) and by the project FONDECYT #7980049.

We thank Barney Clawson for helpful advice.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baker D D. Relationships among pure cultured strains of Frankia based on host specificity. Physiol Plant. 1987;70:245–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baker D D, Schwintzer C R. Introduction. In: Schwintzer C R, Tjepkema J D, editors. The biology of Frankia and actinorhizal plants. New York, N.Y: Academic Press, Inc.; 1990. pp. 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Benson D R, Silvester W B. Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:293–319. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.2.293-319.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Benson D R, Stephens D W, Clawson M L, Silvester W B. Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from Frankia strains in root nodules of Ceanothus griseus, Coriaria arborea, Coriaria plumosa, Discaria toumatou, and Purshia tridentata. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:2904–2909. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.8.2904-2909.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bosco M, Fernandez M P, Simonet P, Materassi R, Normand P. Evidence that some Frankia sp. strains are able to cross boundaries between Alnus and Elaeagnus host specificity groups. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:1569–1576. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.5.1569-1576.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carrasco A, Salyards J R, Berry A M. Studies of two Frankia strains isolated from Trevoa trinervis Miers. Plant Soil. 1995;171:359–363. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carrasco A, Schwencke J, Carú M. Isolation of Frankia from nodules of Trevoa trinervis: ultrastructural characterization. Can J Microbiol. 1992;38:174–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carú M. Characterization of native Frankia strains isolated from Chilean shrubs (Rhamnaceae) Plant Soil. 1993;157:137–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carú M. Sporulation of two Frankia strains in submerged cultures. Acta Microbiol. 1995;6:145–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carú M, Abarzúa M, Carrasco A. Estructura fina de Frankia, cepas ChI1 y ChI2 aisladas de Colletia hystrix (Clos) Acta Microbiol. 1990;3:55–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carú M, Sepúlveda D, Cabello A. Spore germination of Frankia strains isolated from Colletia hystrix and Retanilla ephedra (Rhamnaceae) World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;13:219–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clawson M L, Benson D R, Stephens D W, Resch S C, Silvester W B. Typical Frankia infect actinorhizal plants exotic to New Zealand. NZ J Bot. 1997;35:361–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ehrlich P R, Raven P H. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution. 1965;18:586–608. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Seattle: Department of Genetics, University of Washington; 1993. . (Distributed by the author.) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fernandez M P, Meugnier H, Grimont P A D, Bardin R. Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among members of the genus Frankia. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1989;39:424–429. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gauthier D, Frioni L, Diem H G, Dommergues Y. The Colletia spinosissima-Frankia symbiosis. Acta Oecol Oecol Plant. 1984;5:231–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnson D A. Ph.D. thesis. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: University of Ottawa; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maggia L, Bousquet J. Molecular phylogeny of the actinorhizal Hamamelidae and relationships with host promiscuity towards Frankia. Mol Ecol. 1994;3:459–467. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mirza M S, Janse J D, Hahn D, Akkermans A D L. Identification of atypical Frankia strains by fatty acid analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991;83:91–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mort A, Normand P, Lalonde M. 2-O-Methyl-D-mannose, a key sugar in the taxonomy of Frankia. Can J Microbiol. 1983;29:993–1002. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murry M A, Konopka A S, Pratt S D, Vandergon T L. The use of PCR-based typing methods to assess the diversity of Frankia nodule endophytes of the actinorhizal shrub Ceanothus. Physiol Plant. 1997;99:714–721. [Google Scholar]
  • 22a.Navarro E, Nalin R, Gauthier D, Normand P. The nodular microsymbionts of Gymnostoma spp. are Elaeagnus-infective Frankia strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1610–1616. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.4.1610-1616.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nazaret S, Cournoyer B, Normand P, Simonet P. Phylogenetic relationships among Frankia genomic species determined by use of amplified 16S rDNA sequences. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:4072–4078. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.13.4072-4078.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nick G, Paget E, Simonet P, Moiroud A, Normand P. The nodular endophytes of Coriaria sp. form a distinct lineage within the genus Frankia. Mol Ecol. 1992;1:175–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1992.tb00173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Normand P, Cournoyer B, Simonet P, Nazaret S. Analysis of a ribosomal RNA operon in the actinomycete Frankia. Gene. 1992;111:119–124. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90612-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Normand P, Orso S, Cournoyer B, Jeannin P, Chapelon C, Dawson J, Evtushenko L, Misra A K. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Frankia and related genera and emendation of the family Frankiaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:1–9. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Page R D M. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996;12:357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pernodet J-L, Boccard F, Alegre M-T, Gagnat J, Guerineau M. Organization and nucleotide sequence analysis of a ribosomal RNA gene cluster from Streptomyces ambofaciens. Gene. 1989;79:33–46. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90090-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Racette S, Torrey J G. The isolation, culture and infectivity of a Frankia strain from Gymnostoma papuanum (Casuarinaceae) Plant Soil. 1989;118:165–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ramirez-Saad H, Janse J D, Akkermans A D L. Root nodules of Ceanothus caeruleus contain both the N2-fixing Frankia endophyte and a phylogenetically related Nod−/Fix− actinomycete. Can J Microbiol. 1998;44:140–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Silvester W B. Dinitrogen fixation by plant associations excluding legumes. In: Hardy R W F, Gibson A H, editors. A treatise on dinitrogen fixation. Vol. 4. New York, N.Y: John Wiley and Sons; 1977. pp. 141–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Silvester W B, Balboa O O, Martínez J A. Nodulation and nitrogen fixation in members of the Rhamnaceae (Colletia, Retanilla, Talguenea and Trevoa) growing in the Chilean matorral. Symbiosis. 1985;1:29–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Morgan D R, Swensen S M, Mullin B C, Dowd J M, Martin P G. Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:2647–2651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Strimmer K, Haeseler A V. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13:964–969. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Swensen S M. The evolution of actinorhizal symbioses: evidence for multiple origins of the symbiotic association. Am J Bot. 1996;83:1503–1512. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Swenson S, Mullin B. Phylogenetic relationships among actinorhizal plants. The impact of molecular systematics and implications for the evolution of actinorhizal symbiosis. Physiol Plant. 1997;99:565–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thompson J D, Higgins D G, Gibson T J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tjepkema J D, Schwintzer C R, Benson D R. Physiology of actinorhizal nodules. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1986;37:209–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Torrey J G. Cross-inoculation groups within Frankia. In: Schwintzer C R, Tjepkema J D, editors. The biology of Frankia and actinorhizal plants. New York, N.Y: Academic Press, Inc.; 1990. pp. 83–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Weisburg W G, Barns S M, Pelletier D A, Lane D J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:697–703. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES