Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2023 Nov 27;10(Suppl 2):ofad500.088. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad500.088

1928. Trends In Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) In Seven US sites, 2016─2020

Nadezhda Duffy 1, Rongxia Li 2, Christopher A Czaja 3, Helen Johnston 4, Sarah J Janelle 5, Jesse T Jacob 6, Gillian Smith 7, Lucy E Wilson 8, Elisabeth Vaeth 9, Ghinwa Dumyati 10, Rebecca Tsay 11, Christopher Wilson 12, Daniel Muleta 13, Jacquelyn Mounsey 14, Ruth Lynfield 15, Sean O’Malley 16, Paula S Vagnone 17, Rebecca Pierce 18, P Maureen Cassidy 19, Heather Hertzel 20, Sandra N Bulens 21, Julian E Grass 22, Alice Guh 23,1,2
PMCID: PMC10678466

Abstract

Background

Preventing CRE spread is a U.S. public health priority. We described changes in 2016─2020 CRE incidence rates in 7 U.S. sites that conduct population-based CRE surveillance for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Emerging Infections Program.

Methods

An incident CRE case from 2016 onwards was defined as the 1st isolation of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., or Enterobacter spp. resistant to ≥1 carbapenem from a sterile site or urine in a surveillance area resident in a 30-day period. We reviewed medical records to classify cases as hospital-onset (HO) if the culture was obtained >3 days after hospital admission; healthcare-associated, community-onset (HACO) if the culture was obtained in a non-hospital setting or < 3 days after hospital admission in a person with healthcare exposures in the prior year; and community-associated (CA) if there were no healthcare risk factors. We calculated incidence rates using Census data. We used Poisson mixed effects regression models to perform 2016─2020 trend analyses, adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, and age. We compared adjusted incidence rates between 2016 and subsequent years using incidence rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We also repeated the analysis using a pre-2016 CRE surveillance case definition that was more specific for carbapenemase-producing CRE and required carbapenem nonsusceptibility (excluding ertapenem) and third-generation cephalosporin resistance.

Results

Of 4996 CRE cases, 62% were HACO, 25% CA, and 14% HO. The crude CRE incidence rate per 100,000 was 7.51 in 2016 and 6.08 in 2020 and was highest for HACO, followed by CA and HO (Figure 1). Compared to 2016, the adjusted overall CRE incidence rate declined since 2018, with a decrease of 24% (RR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70−0.83) in 2020 (Figure 2). HACO and CA CRE rates significantly decreased in 2020, but the HO rate did not. Similar trends were seen using the other case definition, except the decline in CA CRE rate since 2016 was not significant (Figure 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Crude CRE incidence rates, overall and by epidemiologic class, 2016─2020*

*Current CRE surveillance case definition (from 2016 onwards) applied to all years

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Adjusted rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals comparing annual 2017-2020 CRE incidence rates to the 2016 CRE incidence rate, using the current surveillance case definition* * Current CRE surveillance case definition (from 2016 onwards) applied to all years starting in 2016

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Adjusted rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals comparing annual 2017-2020 CRE incidence rates to the 2016 CRE incidence rate, using pre-2016 surveillance case definition* * Pre-2016 CRE surveillance case definition applied to all years starting in 2016

Conclusion

Adjusted CRE incidence rates declined from 2016 to 2020 using current and prior case definitions but changes over time varied by epidemiologic class. Continued surveillance and effective control strategies are needed to prevent CRE in all settings.

Disclosures

Ghinwa Dumyati, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Rebecca Tsay, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support


Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES