Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA generally becomes undetectable in upper airways after a few days or weeks postinfection. Here we used a model of viral infection in macaques to address whether SARS-CoV-2 persists in the body and which mechanisms regulate its persistence. Replication-competent virus was detected in bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) macrophages beyond 6 months postinfection. Viral propagation in BAL macrophages occurred from cell to cell and was inhibited by interferon-γ (IFN-γ). IFN-γ production was strongest in BAL NKG2r+CD8+ T cells and NKG2Alo natural killer (NK) cells and was further increased in NKG2Alo NK cells after spike protein stimulation. However, IFN-γ production was impaired in NK cells from macaques with persisting virus. Moreover, IFN-γ also enhanced the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-E on BAL macrophages, possibly inhibiting NK cell-mediated killing. Macaques with less persisting virus mounted adaptive NK cells that escaped the MHC-E-dependent inhibition. Our findings reveal an interplay between NK cells and macrophages that regulated SARS-CoV-2 persistence in macrophages and was mediated by IFN-γ.
Subject terms: Infection, SARS-CoV-2
Huot et al. show that interferon-γ (IFN-γ) regulates the persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in bronchoalveolar macrophages from cynomolgus macaques up to 18 months postinfection.
Main
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replicates in both upper and lower airways, with viral RNA detectable days before symptoms, peaking within the first week, and gradually declining due to host antiviral responses1. However, cellular and humoral immune responses, as well as the activation of neural pathways, can collectively contribute to distant inflammatory effects2. Furthermore, in some SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, complete clearance of the virus does not appear to occur over extended periods3,4.
Macrophages (Mac) and natural killer (NK) cells are frontline innate effector cells against pathogens. Mac responds to microbial threats by producing inflammatory molecules, phagocytosing pathogens and promoting tissue repair. Dysregulated Macs, as observed during SARS-CoV-2 infection, can harm the host, such as in the infection-induced Mac activation syndrome5. Mac comprises about 70% of the total leukocyte population in the lung6 and can be exploited by various viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus, for dissemination, long-term tissue persistence and virus replication7. SARS-CoV-2 can infect monocytes and Macs through different pathways, but whether the virus can complete its lifecycle in these cells is still debated8,9.
NK cells are crucial innate immune responders responsible for viral clearance and can modulate adaptive T and B cell responses10,11. However, their contribution to SARS-CoV-2 immunity remains unclear12,13. High NK cell levels in blood correlate with a rapid viral load decline, but NK cell frequency often decreases in the blood during early SARS-CoV-2 infection, and NK cells display an exhaustion phenotype14. While NK cells from healthy individuals can directly kill SARS-CoV-2-infected cells in vitro, those from moderate or severe cases exhibit impaired cytotoxic activity15–17.
Nonhuman primate (NHP) models are vital tools for understanding immune cell functioning and responses in tissues, particularly when studying human infectious diseases18. We used an NHP model (cynomolgus macaques) to investigate lung-resident Mac and NK cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 (wild-type or Omicron strains) infection. We detected replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 in bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) Mac for up to 18 months after infection. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in these BALF Mac. However, IFN-γ production was reduced in NK cells from some macaques. IFN-γ facilitated the resistance to NK cell-mediated killing through upregulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-E on the cell surface of bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) Mac, which promoted the persistence of the infected cells.
Results
SARS-CoV-2 induces long-term alterations in Mac phenotype
To explore long-term SARS-CoV-2 effects on innate immunity, we infected 25 cynomolgus macaques with wild-type (hereafter WTM, n = 15), Omicron BA.1 (n = 6) and Omicron BA.2 (n = 4) variants (hereafter OM), along with six noninfected macaques as controls (HC; Fig. 1a and Extended Data Table 1). Viral RNA loads peaked in nasal and tracheal swabs at day 3 postinfection (p.i.) in WTM and OM (7.9 × 108 and 2.78 × 107 copies per ml, respectively; Fig. 1a). Viral RNA was higher in the nasal swabs from WTM than OM (Extended Data Fig. 1a). By day 21, all macaques tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasal and tracheal swabs and remained negative by this readout up to 18 months p.i. (Fig. 1a). Immune responses were assessed at a median of 221 d p.i, with the analysis potentially extending to day 479 (Supplementary Table 1). Plasma immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA reactivities against spike and receptor-binding domain (RBD) were comparable in WTM and OM (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1b). Inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, IL-23, CXCL10) were higher in WTM and OM at 221 d.p.i. compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 1c), suggesting lasting inflammation.
Extended Data Table 1.
For all the animals the date of first sampling used to perform the analysis is indicated. The second sampling occurred 2-8 weeks later depending on the monkeys. NA means not applicable. HC are highlighted in gray, WTM in blue and OM in red.
Multiparameter flow cytometry of BALF cells at 221 d p.i. (median) indicated higher frequency of CD45+CD64+ Mac (hereafter Mac) and lower lymphocyte frequencies of CD45+ lymphocyte in WTM than HC (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 1d). Mac and lymphocyte frequencies correlated with plasma CXCL10, IL-23 and IL-6 (Extended Data Fig. 1e), indicating inflammation-linked dysregulation. BALF CD45+CD64+ Mac from WTM and OM showed distinct clustering from HCs. They displayed higher expression of CD206, CD4, CD11c, MHC-E and IL-10 and lower expression of CD16 and CXCR4 compared to HC (Fig.1d,e and Extended Data Fig. 1f,h). They also expressed MHC-E, CD11c and IL-10 more frequently, with fewer CD16+ Mac in WTM and OM compared to HC (Fig. 1f,g), suggesting an alternative activation of alveolar Mac, which may indicate lung contusion and pneumonia19.
Quantification of cytokine production by BALF Macs 8 h post-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation indicated lower IFN-γ in WTM than HC (Fig. 1h and Extended Data Fig. 2). WTM BALF Mac also exhibited reduced viability after 8 h in culture with or without LPS, compared to HC (Fig. 1i,j). Mac viability correlated positively with IFN-γ production at 8 and 12 h post-LPS stimulation (Fig. 1k), suggesting altered activation in SARS-CoV-2-infected Mac, particularly in WTM. These findings indicated a lasting SARS-CoV-2-induced phenotype change in BALF Mac, marked by increased cell frequency, increased expression of MHC-E, IL-10 and CD11c and impaired IFN-γ production in response to LPS, compared to HC.
Replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 is detected in BALF Mac
Given the persisting inflammation and phenotypic modifications of the BALF Mac, we examined the persistence of viral RNA in BALF cells using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 12 of 15 WTM and 5 of 10 OM (Fig. 2a). Viral RNA levels inversely correlated with BALF Mac survival at 24 h (Fig. 2a). Based on viral RNA levels, macaques were grouped as high expressors (>1ΔΔCt that included 6 WTM (hereafter (WTMhi) and 2 OM (hereafter OMhi)), low expressors (<1ΔΔCt, 6 WTMlo and 3 OMlo) and no expression (3 WTMneg and 5 OMneg; Extended Data Fig. 2d). This clustering unveiled that WTMhi and OMhi showed higher IL-18, CXCL10 and sCD14 levels compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 2e).
We next assessed if Mac were a viral source by quantifying spike protein in BALF CD45+CD64+ Mac using intracellular flow cytometry (Fig. 2b). Spike+ Mac was detected in 12 of 15 WCM and 8 of 10 OCM (Fig. 2c). Spike+ Mac frequency was 41% in WTMhi and OMhi, 25% in WTMlo and OMlo and 8.6% in WTMneg and OMneg (Fig. 2c). Spike+ Mac frequency correlated positively with viral RNA in total BALF cells and negatively with BALF Mac survival in culture (Fig. 2c).
To further assess SARS-CoV-2 replication in Mac, we examined double-stranded RNA and nonstructural protein 3 (NSP3) protein expression in BALF Mac over an 18-h culture period (Fig. 2d–f). At 8 h of culture, viral dsRNA and NSP3 proteins were increased in BALF Mac in all 8 WTMhi or OMhi, 5 of 9 WTMlo or OMlo and 3 of 8 WTMneg or OMneg (Fig. 2f and Extended Data Fig. 3a). Spike protein further increased over time in all WTMhi/OMhi and WTMlo/OMlo, but not in 4 of 8 OMneg macaques, suggesting SARS-CoV-2 had the ability to replicate in Mac. We also noticed an increased number of BALF Mac syncytia during the culture period, likely mediated by spike (Extended Data Fig. 3b), and filiform extensions in BALF Mac at 8 h of culture (Extended Data Fig. 3b), which facilitated connections between Macs (Fig. 2g). Confocal images showed NSP3 protein within some of these protrusions (Fig. 2d and Extended Data Fig. 3b), suggesting viral replication in BALF Mac through cell-to-cell propagation.
To study the impact of viral replication in Macs, we analyzed the transcriptome of BALF CD45+CD64+ Mac from 5 randomly selected WTM, 10 OM and 6 HC. Mac was cultured for 8 h, to allow SARS-CoV-2 protein expression. We used a NanoString nCounter codeSet targeting 753 NHP genes involved in immune responses to estimate Mac transcriptomes during viral replication in culture (Fig. 3a). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed the separation of WCM, OCM and HC (Fig. 3b). WTM and OM displayed 138 differentially regulated genes compared to HC (Fig. 3c and Extended Data Fig. 4a,b). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed one significantly enriched gene set (lipid_binding) and ten decreased gene sets (such as cytokine_acticity, chemokine_activity, signaling receptor_regulator_activity and cytokine receptor binding) in all WTM Macs and OM Macs compared to HC Macs (Fig. 3d and Extended Data Fig. 4c,d). Decreased gene sets in the Mac were associated with chemotaxis and cytokines (CXCL1, CXCL6, IFNG and TGFB1), while upregulated genes included FN1, CD1b, S100A8 and S100A9 (Fig. 3e and Extended Data Fig. 4a,b). These observations suggested that SARS-CoV-2 exhibited prolonged persistence and active replication within BALF Mac in infected macaques.
IFN-γ+ NK cells are reduced in WTM and OM BALF
To explore the potential involvement of immune mechanisms in constraining viral replication in the BALF Mac, we conducted an in-depth phenotypical analysis of lymphocytes in BALF. After using a 20-color marker flow panel on total BALF cells from WTM, OM and HC, unbiased clustering revealed nine distinct lymphocyte populations, subsequently validated through manual gating (Fig. 4a and Extended Data Fig. 4e). WTM and OM BALF had an increased frequency of Lin−NKG2R+ NK cells compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 4f). Specifically, WTM had higher counts of NKG2R+CD8+ T cells and CD3+CD4−CD8− T cells. This higher frequency of Lin−NKG2R+ NK cells and NKG2R+CD8+ T cells correlated with elevated expression of NKG2R and EOMES in total BALF cells from WTM, compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 4g). In contrast, OM showed an abundance of CD34+ cells (Extended Data Fig. 4f), potentially accounting for the heightened expression of CD34 and CD117 in total BALF cells compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 4g). Total BALF lymphocytes in OM exhibited increased expression of IFN-γ compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 4g). We observed no variations in the prevalence of other immune cell types among total BALF CD45+ cells, including CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, CD3+CD4+CD8+ T cells or Lin−HLA−DR+ cells, in both WTM and OM compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 4f). When we stratified WTM and OM based on SARS-CoV-2 viral load in total BALF cells, those with high viral loads (WTMhi and OMhi) displayed an elevated frequency of NKG2R+ NK cells (7.03 ± 1.86%) compared to HC (3.59 ± 1.18%; Fig. 4b). In contrast, WTMneg and OMneg macaques exhibited a higher frequency of NKG2R+CD8+ T cells (12.3 ± 5.11%) compared to HC (3.06 ± 1.42%; Fig. 4b).
To delve deeper into the functional profile of NKG2R+ cells, we assessed IFN-γ, GzmB and CD107a using a specialized flow cytometry panel. The frequency of IFN-γ+ NKG2R+ NK cells in WTMhi and OMhi BALF was lower than in HC, while the frequency of IFN-γ+ NKG2R+ CD8+ T cells was higher in WTMneg and OMneg compared to HC (Fig. 4c). In contrast, the frequencies of GzmB+ and CD107a+ NKG2R+ NK cells and NKG2R-T cells were increased in WTMhi and OMhi compared to HC or WTMneg/OMneg (Fig. 4d,e). In line with this, the frequency of GzmB+ and CD107a+ NKG2R+ NK and/or NKG2R+CD8+ T cells positively correlated with the frequency of Spike+ Mac, while the frequency of IFN-γ+ NKG2R+ NK cells and/or NKG2R+CD8+ T cells exhibited a negative correlation with the frequency of Spike+ Mac (Fig. 4f). Our analysis of lymphocyte phenotypes in BALF suggested a link between lower expression of IFN-γ and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in BALF Macs.
IFN-γ restrains SARS-CoV-2 replication in Macs
To gauge the impact of IFN-γ on viral replication in Macs, we cultured BALF Mac isolated from all WTM, OM and HC with 100 U ml−1 of rIFN-γ and assessed SARS-CoV-2 dsRNA levels in the Macs at 8 h of culture, before any viral cytopathic effects could emerge. IFN-γ treatment led to a significant reduction in viral dsRNA levels in treated WTM and OM compared to untreated counterpart Macs (Fig. 5a and Extended Data Fig. 5a,b), indicating effective inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication in BALF Mac by rIFN-γ over this short period. Notably, IFN-γ treatment also improved WTM and OM Mac cell survival at 12 h after culture initiation (Fig. 5b). There was a negative correlation between the expression of IFN-γ in BALF NK cells in vivo and the frequency of Spike+ Mac in BALF (Fig. 5c), further highlighting the impact of IFN-γ on viral persistence in BAL Mac.
IFN-γ treatment enhanced the cell-surface expression of MHC-E, a highly conserved nonclassical MHC class Ib molecule, on BALF Mac, whereas untreated Mac primarily stored MHC-E molecules within intracellular compartments, as expected (Fig. 5d and Extended Data Fig. 5c). Furthermore, IFN-γ treatment resulted in increased total MHC-E expression in WTM and OM Mac compared to untreated BALF Mac counterparts (Fig. 5e and Extended Data Fig. 5d). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of MHC-E on BALF Mac positively correlated with the frequency of IFN-γ+NKG2R+CD8+ T cells in BALF (Fig. 5f), suggesting that IFN-γ likely induced MHC-E expression on Macs in vivo. These findings collectively indicated that IFN-γ inhibited SARS-CoV-2 production and induced MHC-E expression on BALF Mac.
SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts the NK cell transcriptome
MHC-E interacts with the NK cell receptors NKG2A and NKG2C20. This interaction typically inhibits NK cells through NKG2A and activates them through NKG2C21,22. Because specific antibodies for NKG2C in macaques are unavailable and existing NKG2A antibodies cross-react with NKG2C on simian cells23, distinguishing between the NKG2A and NKG2C in macaques generally relies on their mRNA sequences. To investigate the impact of heightened MHC-E expression on NK cell activity, we isolated NKG2R+ NK cells from BALF in WTM and HC at approximately 221 d p.i. and analyzed the in vivo transcriptome of 753 NHP immune response-related genes, including KLRC1 (NKG2A) and KLRC2 (NKG2C) mRNA, using the NanoString nCounter codeSet for macaques, and compared them to HC (Fig. 6a). Transcriptomic analysis indicated that BALF NKG2R+ NK cells consistently showed low KLRC2 (NKG2C) transcript level compared to KLRC1 (NKG2A) transcript level in both WTM and HC (Fig. 6a).
Based on gene expression, PCA analysis showed that BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from 14 of 15 WTM distinctly separated from BALF NKG2R+ NK cells in HC (Fig. 6b). Using a significance threshold of adjusted P value (Padj = 0.05) and mRNA log2(fold change) > 2, only FOXj1, a known inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation and IFN-γ secretion in T cells24, was significantly upregulated in BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from WTM compared to HC (Fig. 6b). With less stringent criteria, including a nonadjusted P value (P = 0.05) and log2(fold change) > 1 the comparison between WTM and HC, we identified several genes (CD36, GzmB, GNLY, PIGR, CD38, SERPING1, KCNJ3, KLRC3, CLU, C3, MUC1 and FOXJ1) that displayed differential modulation in NKG2R+ NK cells from WTM compared to HC (Extended Data Fig. 6a).
Using the NanoString nCounter codeSet for analyzing genes expressed within NK cells isolated from the blood and BALF of WTM, we observed that BALF NKG2R+ NK cells formed a distinct cluster, clearly separated from blood-derived NK cells, as confirmed by PCA (Fig. 6c,d). In total, 448 genes were differentially expressed (208 upregulated and 240 downregulated) in BALF compared to blood NK cells (Fig. 6d). Notably, mRNA for NK cell receptors (KLRD1, KLRC3, CD247, KLRB1 and KLRK1), transcription factors regulating NK cell development and maturation (TCF1, ID2, T-BET, EOMES, PRDM1 and GATA3) and cytotoxic activity genes (GzM family members, PERF and IFNG) were downregulated in BALF NK cells compared to blood NK cells in WTM (Fig. 6e). Conversely, mRNA coding for CD74, the macrophage inhibitory factor receptor that inhibits NK cell activity, Fcγ receptors, toll-like receptors (TLRs), integrin, pro-inflammatory molecules and the transcription factor IRF8, linked to adaptive NK cells25, were upregulated in NKG2R+ NK cells from BALF compared to blood (Fig. 6e). These findings suggested that BALF NKG2R+ NK cells in WTM may have impaired capacity to control SARS-CoV-2 replication, and these transcriptomic changes persisted even after a median of 461 d p.i. The transcriptomic profiles also showed increased TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA in NKG2R+ BALF NK cells from WTM compared to HC (Fig. 6e).
To further evaluate how NK cells are impacted in the WTM and OM, we used a 20-color marker flow cytometry analysis to assess markers of NK cell activity in BALF NKG2R+ NK cells (Fig. 6f and Extended Data Fig. 6b–e). BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from WTM exhibited higher expression of NKG2R, CD16 and GzmB compared to OM (Extended Data Fig. 6b). NKG2R expression on bulk NK cells correlated with the percentage of Spike+ Mac in BALF (Extended Data Fig. 6c). When clustering macaques according to viral load in total BALF cells, WTMhi and OMhi had higher expressions of NKG2R, NKP30, CD16, GzmB and CD107a, but lower expression of CD226 (DNAX Accessory Molecule-1(DNAM-1)) compared to WTMneg and OMneg (Fig. 6g). The changes observed in NKG2R and CD16 expression, along with differences in GzmB expression, strongly indicated alterations in NK cell maturation.
Next, analysis of BALF NK cell maturation profiles based on CD16 and NKG2R expression indicated that both WTM and OM had lower frequencies of mature NKG2RloCD16+ NK cells in BALF compared to HC (Fig. 6h). When clustered based on viral load in total BALF cells, bulk NK cells in WTMhi, OMhi, WTMlo and OMlo had a decreased frequency of NK cell subsets with low NKG2R expression (NKG2RloCD16− and NKG2RloCD16+) compared to HC (Fig. 6i). The frequency of NKG2RloCD16− and NKG2RloCD16+ subsets among total NK cells displayed, negative correlations with the percentage of Spike+ Mac in BALF (Extended Data Fig. 6e), suggesting that viral RNA detection in BALF correlated with changes in NK cell phenotypes, population composition and cytolytic function. Overall, the transcriptomic and phenotypic profiles indicated a profound, long-lasting impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on NK cells, potentially reflecting a blockade of NK cell antiviral activity and an adaptive NK cell profile.
SARS-CoV-2 spike modulates NK cell function
Next, we analyzed if SARS-CoV-2 particles could directly modulate NK cells. SARS-CoV-2 N and spike proteins engage TLR2 and TLR4 (refs. 26,27), respectively. TLR2 and TLR4 are known to be expressed on NK cell surfaces28 and were increased on NK cells in the WTMs. To examine whether BALF NK cells could bind SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, we incubated total BALF cells from WTM, OM and HC with biotinylated recombinant trimeric spike protein (rtSpike) for 1 h (Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). BALF CD20+ B cells from OM exhibited strong SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding (19.65 ± 12%) compared to HC (2.79 ± 0.87%); (Extended Data Fig. 7c). WTM and OM BALF Spike+CD20+ B cell levels correlated with the titer of RBD IgG in plasma (Extended Data Fig. 7c), suggesting that CD20+ B cells could effectively bind trimeric spike protein, possibly as a result of the emergence of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells following the acute phase of the infection29. NK cells showed robust binding to spike protein binding (Extended Data Fig. 7b) with a median percentage of 25.8% (±8.78), 23.3% (±14.61) and 16% (±13.87) for NKG2R+ NK cells from HC, WCM and OCM, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 7d), and thus lower than binding to B cells, but notably higher than the binding to CD4+ or CD8+ T cells (Extended Data Fig. 7d).
To assess the impact of spike binding to NK cells on NK cell function, BALF NKG2R+ NK cells were exposed to rtSpike, monomeric S1 (containing the RBD), trimeric S2 domains, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (negative control) or LPS (positive controls) for 24 h (Fig. 7a and Extended Data Fig. 8a). The frequency of GzmB+NKG2Rhi and IFN-γ+NKG2Rlo NK cells increased when WTM or OM BALF NK cells were exposed to rtSpike compared to DMSO (Fig. 7b,c). IFN-γ production was primarily observed in NKG2Rlo NK cells (16.4 ± 10.14%), while GzmB production was mainly attributed to NKG2Rhi NK cells (17.2 ± 10.7%) (Extended Data Fig. 8a). Following spike protein stimulation, NKG2Rhi NK cells from WTMneg and OMneg exhibited higher expression of GzmB than NKG2Rhi NK cells from WTMhi and OMhi, while NKG2Rlo NK cells from WTMneg and OMneg had higher expression of IFN-γ compared to NKG2Rlo NK cells from WTMhi and OMhi (Fig. 7d). These observations indicated that NK cells could bind SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and that this affected their function, particularly the production of GzmB and IFN-γ in the NKG2Rhi and NKG2Rlo NK cell subsets, respectively.
MHC-E restricts NK cells in convalescent macaques
MHC-E, the ligand of NKG2R, primarily binds peptides from MHC class Ia signal peptides (SP)30–32 and can also bind pathogen-derived peptides like SARS-CoV-2 peptides16,33. To explore how NKG2R-MHC-E modulated NK cell activity, we searched for SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides resembling canonical MHC-E binding peptides34. In silico analyses considered SP-derived peptide cleavage by protease signal peptide peptidase (SPP; Extended Data Fig. 9a). The nonamer peptide, V3–11, was identified within spike protein (position 3–11) and reported to be presented by HLA-A02:01 in vivo35 (Extended Data Fig. 9b,c). Some viral peptides can bind both classical MHC-I and nonclassical MHC-E molecules, which is potentially relevant in transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP)-deficient viral infections where MHC-E-bound peptides resemble those binding to HLA-A02:01 (refs. 35,36). Despite low binding score predictions (Extended Data Fig. 9d,e), a MHC-E stabilization assay using V3–11 peptides on K562 cells transduced with MHC-E01:01 (K562-E01) indicated that V3–11 stabilized MHC-E at the cell surface, akin to VL9 and HSP60 peptides (Fig. 8a,b).
We then analyzed the NK cell activity against target cells presenting V3–11 peptide through MHC-E. Total Lin−CD56+CD16+ NK cells were isolated from frozen human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected before 2019 to ensure donors were SARS-CoV-2 naïve (Fig. 8c and Extended Data Fig. 9f). In cocultures with K562-E*01 pulsed with 30 or 300 µM V3–11 peptide, NK cell degranulation, assessed by CD107a expression 8 h later, was compared to that after pulsing with VL9 (known to inhibit NKG2A+ NK cells) and HSP60 (no NKG2A+ inhibition) control peptides. As expected, VL9 inhibited NKG2A+ NK cells more than NKG2C+NKG2A−NK cells, whereas HSP60 inhibited NKG2C+ and NKG2A− NK cells similarly (Fig. 8d). NKG2C+ NK cell degranulation was not inhibited by V3–11, while NKG2C−NKG2A+ NK cell degranulation was (Fig. 8d). Inhibition of NKG2C−NKG2A+ NK cell degranulation by V3–11 was similar to that of VL9 and higher than that of HSP60 (Fig. 8e).
Degranulation activity of BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from HC macaques was similarly inhibited by VL9 and V3–11, not by HSP60 (Fig. 8f). However, V3–11 inhibited the degranulation of BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from WTM less than VL9 (Fig. 8f). V311 strongly inhibited the degranulation of BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from WTMhi, but not that of BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from WTMneg (Fig. 8f). Inhibition by V3–11 positively correlated with the frequency of Spike+ Mac and with the amount of viral RNA in total BALF cells from WTM (Fig. 8g), suggesting that NKG2R+ NK cells from WTMlo and WTMneg as well as OMlo and OMneg evaded MHC-E-mediated inhibition. Thus, the spike protein-derived V3–11 peptide strongly inhibited the MHC-E-dependent degranulation activity of NKG2R+ NK cells from WTMhi and OMhi, whereas NKG2R+ NK cells from WTMlo, WTMneg, OMlo and OMneg were less inhibited.
Discussion
In this study, using Wuhan or Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2, we detected viral RNA in BALF of 17 of 25 infected macaques and viral antigens in the BALF Mac of 20 of 25 macaques at 6 months p.i., with the virus in the BALF Mac capable of replication up to at least 221 d p.i., even when it was undetectable in nasopharyngeal and tracheal swabs. BALF Mac from WTMhi and OMhi exhibited reduced IFN-γ production when stimulated with LPS, and BALF NKG2R+ NK cells from WTM and OM displayed decreased IFN-γ expression compared to HC. The suppressed IFN-γ expression in BALF NKG2Rlo NK cells could be rescued through stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The spike protein-derived peptide V3–11 bound to MHC-E and inhibited NK cell degranulation activity, and the extent of inhibition induced by V3–11 correlated significantly with viral load and the presence of Spike+ Mac in the BALF. NK cells from WTMlo and OMlo had a higher degree of resistance to the inhibitory effects of V3–11.
WTM had higher viral load in acute infection compared to OM, suggesting infection with Wuhan and Omicron strains mimicked SARS-CoV-2 acute infection in humans37. Several other parameters paralleled human findings, such as persistent systemic inflammation months after initial infection38. Notably, the frequency of persisting virus in BALF Mac was more elevated in WTM than in OM. Our data demonstrate an active persistent SARS-CoV-2 viral reservoir, consistent with findings of persisting viral reservoirs in humans5. It is worth noting that the frequency of macaques with persisting virus may be higher than in humans, eventually due to our high infection doses.
In vitro studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can enter human Mac9,39,40. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE-2) expression has been described in Mac from patients with COVID-19 and viral proteins have been observed in Macs from various tissues postmortem4. This suggests that Macs could be directly infected by SARS-CoV-2 in vivo. Detection of viral antigen and RNA in Mac might also result from phagocytosis of infected alveolar epithelial cells, possibly followed by lysosome escape41. Antibody-dependent enhancement of cellular infection may also be a mechanism of Mac infection, as seen in SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection42. It’s likely that other cellular reservoirs in the lung exist, but our data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 exploits Mac as a key repository for dissemination and long-term persistence.
While the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into human monocytes and Mac is documented, the release of infectious viral particles from Mac has remained unclear. Our study shows that SARS-CoV-2 is produced in primary cultures of BALF Mac. Increasing virus levels during culture corresponded to ongoing viral replication and were accompanied by virus-induced morphological changes in the cells and gene expression changes. The morphological changes include membrane ruffling and the presence of filiform extensions that connected multiple Mac in culture, with viral proteins detected within these extensions. This suggests virus dissemination through cell-to-cell mechanisms, aligning with reports on tunneling nanotubes in SARS-CoV-2 spreading43. Such mechanisms could allow the escape of immune system sensing and provide a further means for SARS-CoV-2 to persist in tissues. In some macaques, SARS-CoV-2 production was detected after BALF Mac culture even when viral RNA in BALF was undetectable ex vivo, suggesting the presence of occult infection that can be re-activated.
Transcriptomic profiles of cultured BALF Macs revealed increased expression of FN1 (fibronectin), potentially contributing to the observed morphological changes. Expression of S100A8/S100A9 (calprotectin) was also elevated, similar to reports in infected humans38. S100A8/S100A9 has been linked to chronic TLR4/RAGE signaling and chronic expression of IL-1b, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor in long COVID/Postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC)44, potentially explaining the elevated IL-6 expression in WTM and OM plasma. CD1b, a nonpolymorphic MHC class I-like glycoprotein that activates NK cells through CD36, was increased in BALF WTM and OM Mac in vitro compared to HC. Antigen processing pathways for CD1 and MHC-E-bound ligands mainly occur in endosomal compartments32,45, which SARS-CoV-2 can manipulate46. The impact of endosome manipulation on CD1 or MHC-E peptide processing remains poorly explored47. Our data, showing increased MHC-E and CD1b expression in BALF Mac, suggest upregulation of noncanonical antigen presentation pathways.
We found that IFN-γ inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in BALF Mac. IFN-γ expression was reduced in BALF Mac and NK cells in WTM and OM compared to HC. In BALF Mac from convalescent macaques, increased IL-10 expression may inhibit IFN-γ. Transcriptomic analysis indicated increased expression of FOXJ1 mRNA in WTM and OM BALF NK cells compared to HC BALF NK cells. FOXJ1 is known to inhibit NF-κB activation and IFN-γ secretion in CD4+ T cells24, but its function in NK cells is unknown. The impairment in IFN-γ production in BALF NK cells and Mac might be partly compensated by IFN-γ production in unconventional NKG2R+CD8+ T cells. Additionally, IFN-γ production by more mature NKG2Alo NK cells might be stimulated by spike protein. IFN-γ also induced the upregulation of MHC-E on BALF Mac. Because MHC-E inhibits NKG2A+ NK cells, its upregulation might protect the Mac from NK cell-mediated lysis. Thus, IFN-γ inhibited viral replication, but concomitantly rendered the SARS-CoV-2-infected cells more resistant to NK cell killing through MHC-E upregulation. Thus, IFN-γ might promote viral persistence by inhibiting the elimination of infected cells, despite the fact that it restrains viral replication.
NK cell degranulation activity was inhibited by the V3–11 peptide presented through MHC-E, suggesting a role for this spike peptide in SARS-CoV-2 evasion of the immune response. Peptides from SARS-CoV-2 spike and Nsp13 proteins can bind to MHC-E16,33. Target cells presenting V3–11 through MHC-E inhibited the degranulation of NK cells from SARS-CoV-2-naïve macaques and humans, but not that of NK cells from WTMneg and OMneg. This observation indicated the induction of adaptive NK cells in WTMneg and OMneg that escape MHC-E-mediated inhibition and further highlighted the intricate interplay between Mac and NK cells. It is unclear why NK cells with such adaptive function arouse in some, but not all macaques. The enhanced MHC-E-restricted NK cell adaptive activity may be related to early infection events, cytokine environments, prior infections, vaccinations and host genetics. In conclusion, our study showed that SARS-CoV-2 persisted in lung Mac and could disseminate through cell-to-cell channels. IFN-γ, produced by NKG2R+CD8+ T cells and NKG2Rlo NK cells, regulated SARS-CoV-2 persistence and induced the expression of MHC-E on Mac. The NK cells from some macaques could evade the MHC-E-mediated inhibition, prompting further investigation into the inducibility of such NK cells by immunotherapies and vaccines.
Methods
Human samples
Blood samples from healthy donors were obtained from the French blood bank (Etablissement Français du Sang) as part of an agreement with the Institut Pasteur (C CPSL UNT, 15/EFS/023). The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee (Comité de protection des personnes) of Île-de-France VII. Participants’ sex, number and age were not available due to the anonymous and nonremunerated nature of the blood donations. Fifty-milliliter blood samples were obtained from 12 donors. All blood samples were collected before 2019, and PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll gradient and immediately frozen.
Macaques
Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) aged 37–60 months were sourced from Mauritian AAALAC-certified breeding centers. The study was conducted at Infectious Diseases Models for Innovative Therapies (IDMIT) infrastructure facilities with appropriate containment levels in accordance with regulations. At the time of infection, all animals were seronegative for specific viruses. Following infection, the macaques were housed individually in biosafety facilities. Both male and female monkeys were included in the study, and sample collection was performed randomly. The study protocols received approval from the institutional ethical committee, ‘Comité d’Ethique en Expérimentation Animale du Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives’ (CEtEA 44), under statement numbers A20_011, 20_066 and 21_069. Authorization for the study was granted by the ‘Research, Innovation, and Education Ministry’ under registration numbers APAFIS 24434-2020030216532863v1, APAFIS 29191-2021011811505374v1 and APAFIS 33414-2021101115102064v1.
Blinding and randomization
During sample collection, the investigators were not blinded, but the animal handlers were unaware of group allocations. Data collection procedures were carefully randomized or appropriately blocked to minimize potential bias. We used randomization techniques in the organization of experimental conditions and stimulus presentation, further enhancing the reliability and validity of our findings. All animals involved in our study were included in the research, and none were excluded at any point during the study’s duration.
SARS-CoV-2 strains
For in vivo investigations, following three distinct SARS-CoV-2 isolates were used: the human wild-type (Wuhan) strain (hCoV-19/France/lDF0372/2020 strain), the Omicron BA.1 VOC (hCoV-19/USA/GAEHC-2811C/2021, EPI_ISL_7171744) and the Omicron BA.2 VOC (hCoV-19/Japan/UT-NCD1288-2 N/2022, EPI_ISL_9595604). Virus stocks used in vivo were generated through two passages on mycoplasma-free Vero E6 cells. Virus titration was performed on Vero E6 cells.
Experimental group size estimation
We followed the ‘3Rs’ principle for animal research, aiming to minimize the use of experimental subjects. Animals were selected to closely match in terms of age, weight and genotype. Sample size calculations were performed using power analysis, which accounts for effect size, s.d., type 1 error and 80% power in a two-sample t test with a 5% significance level (two-sided test). We used G power software version 3.1.9.7. for these calculations, with D determined as (difference in means)/(s.d.), estimated from our preliminary results. We considered a maximum D value of 1.8 based on previous studies for sample size calculation.
Animal infection protocol
The viral dose and route of infection were administered following previously described protocols48. Challenged macaques were exposed to a total dose of 106 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 through a combination of intranasal and intratracheal routes (day 0), using atropine (0.04 mg kg−1) as premedication and ketamine (5 mg kg−1) with medetomidine (0.042 mg kg−1) as anesthesia.
Tissue collection and processing
PBMCs were isolated using Ficoll density-gradient centrifugation. BALF samples underwent centrifugation, and mononuclear cells were separated using standard density-gradient centrifugation.
SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA quantification in nasopharyngeal and tracheal samples
Upper respiratory (nasopharyngeal and tracheal) specimens were collected using swabs (universal transport medium, Copan; or viral transport medium, CDC, DSR-052-01). Tracheal swabs were obtained by inserting the swab just above the tip of the epiglottis into the upper trachea, approximately 1.5 cm beyond the epiglottis tip. All collected specimens were stored between 2 °C and 8 °C until analysis. Viral copy numbers were determined via quantitative RT–PCR using a plasmid standard concentration range containing an RdRp gene fragment that included the RdRp-IP4 RT–PCR target sequence. The estimated limit of detection was 460 copies, as previously described48. Detailed protocols are also accessible on the World Health Organization (WHO) website (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/real-time-rt-pcr-assays-for-the-detection-of-sars-cov-2-institut-pasteur-paris.pdf?sfvrsn=3662fcb6_2). Primer sets sequence nCoV_IP2 (5′-ATGAGCTTAGTCCTGTTG-3′, 5′-CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT-3′) and nCoV_IP4 (5′-GGTAACTGGTATGATTTCG-3′, 5′-CTGGTCAAGGTTAATATAGG-3′).
SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA quantification in BALF cells
Viral copy numbers were determined via quantitative RT–PCR. Detailed protocols are accessible on the WHO website. Relative quantification of the viral genome was conducted using one-step RT–qPCR with the RNA-to-CT 1 Step Kit (Applied Biosystems, 4392938). Thermal cycling was conducted in a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) equipped with Windows 10 and 7500 Fast software version 2.3. The 2−ΔΔCt was calculated based on the mean Ct values for viral RNA using the nCoV-IP4 primers and 18S RNA Cts obtained for each monkey.
SARS-CoV-2 ELISA
ELISAs were performed as previously described49. Optical densities were measured at 405 nm, and area under the curve values were calculated.
Luminex (Bio-Plex) and ELISA assay for plasmatic inflammatory mediators
The Luminex and ELISA assay was used to measure a panel of essential plasmatic anti- and pro-inflammatory mediators including IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-23, IL-6, IL-15, IP-10, IL-18 and CD14s. The measurement process adhered to the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Measurements were conducted with the Bio-Plex 200 system.
Isolation of NK cells and Mac
For the isolation of Human CD56+ NK cells, we achieved a purity of over 90% from PBMC through positive selection using antibody-coated magnetic beads provided by Miltenyi Biotec. Specifically, the anti-NKG2A PE-conjugated monoclonal antibody (clone Z199; Beckman Coulter Life Sciences) was used, and all steps of cell staining and selection were meticulously performed following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Similarly, Simian NKG2R+ NK cells were isolated to a purity exceeding 90% from both BALF and blood samples using positive selection with antibody-coated magnetic beads from Miltenyi Biotec. In this case, we also used the anti-NKG2A PE-conjugated monoclonal antibody (clone Z199; Beckman Coulter Life Sciences), and the entire process of cell staining and selection was strictly carried out in accordance with the supplier’s instructions.
For the isolation of Mac from BALF samples, we used a positive selection strategy using the anti-CD64 PE-conjugated monoclonal antibody (clone 10.1; BD Biosciences). To identify the isolated Mac, we used anti-PE microbeads from Miltenyi Biotec. Like the previous isolations, the staining and selection procedures for Mac were conducted following the supplier’s guidelines.
Cell culture
K562 (human HLA class I–negative erythroleukemia) cells (ATCC, CCL-243) and HLA-E transduced K562 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U ml−1 penicillin and 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin.
NK cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 with Glutamax (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 μg ml−1 streptomycin, 100 IU ml−1 IL-2 and 10 ng ml−1 IL-15.
Mac, postpositive selection, were cultured at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells per ml in a 24-well tissue culture plate (Nunc) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with FBS and 10 ng ml−1 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) for up to 24 h. Macrophage stimulation was carried out at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells per ml, with options for no treatment, 100 ng ml−1 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) or 20 ng ml−1 IFN-γ (R&D Systems) for the specified duration
NK cell stimulation assays
NK cells were grown in RPMI medium 1640 (supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mmol l−1 l-glutamine, 1% penicillin–streptomycin–neomycin, 2-ME), at a concentration of 2.0 × 106 cells per ml recombinant human IL-2 (50 U ml−1). LPS or spike compounds were added to the culture at the following concentrations: 100 ng ml−1 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 µg ml−1 of spike compounds. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. Cells were then collected, fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) and stained for flow analysis.
Fluorescence quantification and cell segmentation methodology
In this study, we used a robust methodology for quantifying individual fluorescence in Mac during primary culture. This process, adapted from previous work50,51, ensured accurate and reproducible results. The following workflow, implemented using Fiji software (version 1.53 with Java1.8.0_322), was used for image segmentation: (1) image reprocessing—images underwent preprocessing using Find Edges filters. This step enhanced the subsequent thresholding process. Minimum and maximum sliders were manually adjusted to optimize image saturation, ensuring clarity and accuracy. (2) Thresholding—it was applied to create a binary mask from the preprocessed image. This step separated desired objects from the background. (3) Mask creation and manipulation—a mask, representing the segmented objects of interest, was created based on the thresholded image. The mask isolated regions of significance for analysis. (4) Selection transfer—selections were transferred from the mask to the original image. This step allowed for the extraction of quantitative data from the selected regions. (5) Data analysis—the ‘Analyze Particles’ tool was used to extract desirable objects based on the selections. Individual MFI statistics for each channel were calculated and reported for the segmented objects. These data provided insights into fluorescence levels within Mac.
Antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
The human monoclonal antibody Cv2.31942 was cloned from a patient convalescent from COVID-19, produced as a recombinant IgG1, and purified49.
SARS-CoV-2 protein production
Codon-optimized nucleotide fragments encoding stabilized versions of trimeric SARS-CoV-2 and BA.1 spike ectodomains, followed by C-terminal tags (8xHis-tag and AviTag), were synthesized and cloned into pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+) expression vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Glycoproteins were produced by transient transfection of exponentially growing Freestyle 293-F suspension cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using polyethylenimine precipitation method. Proteins were purified from culture supernatants by high-performance chromatography using the Ni Sepharose Excel Resin according to the manufacturer’s instructions (GE HealthCare), dialyzed against PBS using Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassettes (Thermo Fisher Scientific), quantified using NanoDrop 2000 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and controlled for purity by SDS–PAGE using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis–Tris gels (Life Technologies). For polychromatic flow cytometry immunofluorescence staining, SARS-CoV-2 tri-S proteins were biotinylated using Enzymatic Protein Biotinylation Kit (Sigma-Aldrich).
Search for SARS-CoV-2 peptides with potential for efficient binding to MHC-E
We used IEDB prediction tools (version 2.27) to identify peptides with the potential to bind to MHC-E. Recent studies have revealed that SARS-CoV-2 NSP13 contains peptides capable of binding to MHC-E16. While many of these peptides were initially identified in silico and subsequently validated in vitro, it is important to recognize that MHC-E peptide presentation can occur independently of TAP, particularly in cells with deficiencies in components of the MHC class I processing pathway, such as TAP or Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 (IRF1)32,52,53. Such deficiencies may arise during SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to an alternative HLA-E peptide repertoire32,54.
Intriguingly, most HLA class I molecules contribute their leader sequences for binding to the nonclassical HLA-E, with the cleavage of these signal sequences mediated by SPas and SPP31,55,56. These leader peptides, in fact, represent the dominant source of peptides for HLA-E. The essential intramembrane proteolysis of signal peptides is a crucial step in generating MHC class I signal peptides32,52. However, the precise loading mechanism for TAP-independent signal peptides into MHC class I molecules remains elusive57.
In eukaryotic cells, secretory and membrane proteins contain a signal sequence crucial for guiding protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)58,59. Following insertion into the protein-conduction channel, signal peptides are typically cleaved from the preprotein by signal peptidase (SPas)60. Subsequently, these signal peptides, confined as small domains within the ER membrane, may undergo intramembrane proteolysis via cleavage within their transmembrane region, facilitated by the presenilin-type aspartic protease SPP32,61,62. Given that processing by SPas and SPP is believed to occur outside the peptide-loading complex, this intricate machinery has a pivotal role in optimizing ligand length and quality, thus facilitating peptide loading onto nascent MHC class I molecules. Additionally, it ‘edits’ the repertoire of bound peptides to maximize their affinity. Peptide ligands suitable for MHC class I binding are thought to be generated following intramembrane proteolysis by SPP, which promotes the release of signal peptide fragments from the ER membrane32.
Therefore, our investigation led us to explore additional peptides with the potential to bind to MHC-E using nonclassical pathways. In this context, we performed a signal peptide structural analysis using SignalP 6.0 (ref. 63). Using signalp software (version 6.0), we scrutinized the N-terminal region of the spike protein from MERS-CoV (A0A140AYZ5), SARS-CoV-1 (P59594) and SARS-CoV-2 (P0DTC2). This analysis strongly indicates that the signal peptide of the SARS spike protein can be cleaved by signal peptidase (SPas) and SPP. Typically, signal peptide sequences consist of the following three domains: a hydrophobic core (h region) in blue, spanning 6–15 amino acids; a polar C-terminal end (c region) in green, characterized by small uncharged amino acids; a polar N-terminal region (n region) in red, with a positive net charge. It is also worth noting that Sec/SPI signal peptides, classified as ‘standard’ secretory signal peptides, undergo transport through the Sec translocon and are cleaved by signal peptidase I. Among these peptides, three have been described in the immune epitope database (IEDB) and experimentally validated. Notably, the V3–11 peptide sequence bears the closest resemblance to the canonical MHC-E binding motif.
Peptides and HLA-E stabilization assay
Synthetic peptides biotinylated or not were purchased from Proimmune and dissolved in DMSO at the concentration of 2 mg ml−1. The control peptides used were VL9 (VMAPRTVLL) and HSP60 (QMRPVSRVL). K562 and K562-E*0101 cells were incubated with synthetic peptides (3–300 μM) at 37 °C for 15–20 h in serum-free AIM-V medium (GIBCO BRL) at a concentration of 1–3 × 106 cells per ml. Control cultures were kept at 37 °C for over 16 h without peptides. Cells were then collected, washed in PBS and cell-surface expression of HLA-E was determined by incubation with PE-conjugated anti-HLA-E antibody, washed twice with PBS and fixed in 100 μl of Cyto x (BD Biosciences). Cells were acquired using a Fortessa (BD Biosciences) equipped with DIVA software (version 8.0), and FlowJo software (version 10.4.2; Tree Star) was used for all analyses. Results were expressed directly as MFI.
Polychromatic flow cytometry immunofluorescence staining
The antibodies used for flow cytometry and immunofluorescence staining are listed in Supplementary Table 1. PBMCs and BALF lymphocytes were stained as described previously64, with crystal violet65 used to minimize alveolar macrophage autofluorescence. The anti-NKG2A antibody recognizes NKG2A, NKG2C and NKG2E on simian cells and NKG2A on human cells. Flow cytometry was conducted using an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences), and intracellular staining was achieved with BD Cyto x/Cytoperm. Data analysis was performed with FlowJo 10.4.2 software (FlowJo, LLC), using FlowJo plugins Phenograph (version 3.0) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP; version 3.1). Phenograph used a K mean of 50, while UMAP used nearest neighbors with a value of 25 and a minimal value of 0.25.
Immunofluorescence staining involved fixing Mac in 4% PFA after various culture periods, followed by staining. Membrane permeabilization was achieved with Triton X-100, and primary antibodies were applied. After a 2-h incubation, unbound primary antibodies were washed with PBS. Secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:200) coupled with fluorescent dyes were used for detection for 1 h at 37 °C. Sections were mounted with Vectashield containing DAPI (4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Vector Laboratories). Immunofluorescence analysis was conducted using a CELENA X High Content Imaging System (Logos Biosystems) equipped with the CELENA X Explorer (version 1.6.0) or a spinning-disk Ti2E Microscope (Nikon—Yokogawa CSU-W1).
NanoString NHP immunology V2 panel multiplex gene expression profiling
We conducted gene expression profiling using the NanoString nCounter analysis system (NanoString Technologies) with whole cell lysates in RNA Later Tissue (RLT) buffer (20,000 cells per µl) following supplier instructions. RNA transcripts were analyzed with the nCounter NHP Immunology V2 Panel, encompassing 754 genes and 16 internal reference genes for data normalization. Data analysis used ROSALIND (https://rosalind.bio/) with HyperScale architecture by ROSALIND. Quality control involved read distribution percentages, violin plots, identity heatmaps and sample MDS plots. Normalization was performed by dividing counts within a lane by the geometric mean of normalizer probes from the same lane, selecting housekeeping probes via geNorm. Fold changes and P values were computed using the fast method from the nCounter Advanced Analysis 2.0 User Manual, with P value adjustment via the Benjamini–Hochberg method for false discovery rates (FDRs). Clustering of differentially expressed genes into the final heatmap used the partitioning around medoids method, considering factors like signal direction, gene position, role and type, among others, with the fpc R library.
MHC-E-dependent NK cell viral suppressor assays
NK cell activity was determined through the expression of cell surface CD107a, as previously described66. K562-E*0101 cells were incubated with 30–300 μM of a given peptide at 26 °C for 15–20 h. NK cells were cocultured with 2 × 104 K562-E*0101 target cells pulsed or not with peptides at an NK cell/target cell ratio of 5:1. Target cells were in parallel cultured in the absence of NK cells. Anti-CD107a antibody was added at the start of the assay, and GolgiStop and GolgiPlug (both BD Biosciences) were added 1 h after start of the stimulation. After 8 h of culture, cell suspensions were stained for viability and cytotoxic activity was analyzed through measurement of CD107a expression by flow cytometry. The percentage of inhibition was calculated as follows: % of inhibition = 100 − specific lysis. The specific lysis was calculated as described66,67 using the following formula: (E − S)/(M − S) × 100 (where E = NK cells degranulation against target cells loaded with peptides, S = spontaneous NK cells degranulation and M = NK cells degranulation against target cells without peptides).
Statistics
Data analysis and statistical tests were conducted using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, version 10.0.2). Various statistical analyses were applied in the study, including the Mann-Whitney Test, utilized in Figs. 1b, 4a, and 7; the Kruskal-Wallis Test with Dunn’s post hoc test, employed in Figs. 1c,g,h, 2a,c, 3, 4a,g, 5–7, and 8d,e; the Non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, applied in Fig. 1k; Linear Regression, used in Figs. 1b, 3d, 5c, 6h,i, and 8f; and Spearman Correlation Analysis, conducted in Figs. 1k, 4f, 5c,f, 6h,i, 7f, and 8l. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was considered. FDRs and Padj corrections were applied for multiple comparisons.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41590-023-01661-4.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the excellent help from the veterinarians and staff at the IDMIT Center (B. Delache, E. Burban, J. Demilly, N. Dhooge, S. Langlois, P. Le Calvez, M. Potier, F. Relouzat, J. M. Robert and C. Dodan) for help with animal studies, Q. Pascal for performing the necropsies, and F. Ducancel and Y. Gorin for help with the logistics and safety management. C. Petitdemange was supported by the Pasteur-Roux Cantarini fellowship, the Young Investigator Sidaction fellowship and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant (R01AI143457). A.O.R. and E.B. received a doctoral fellowship from the Université Paris Cité and the Ministère français de lʼEnseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de lʼInnovation. This work was supported by the ‘URGENCE COVID-19’ fundraising campaign of Institut Pasteur. H.M. received core funding from the Institut Pasteur and the INSERM and was supported by grants from the ANR REACTing Covid19 (20RR028-00), the European Commission Horizon 2020 program (RECoVER project, 101003589), the Institut Pasteur Task Force COVID-19 (2019-NCOV THERAMAB project) and the Fondation de France (00106077). Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge the support from NIH under grants R01DK130472 and R01AI143457 to R.K.R. We gratefully acknowledge the support of Institut Pasteur and Gilead for the purchase of the Fortessa equipment. We are grateful for the support of IDMIT by the French government—Investments for the Future program for infrastructures (PIA) through the ANR-11-INBS-0008 grant as well as from the PIA grant ANR-10-EQPX-02-01 to the FlowCyTech facility at IDMIT. We equally acknowledge the Investments for Future grant ANR-10-INSB-04 to support the UtechS Photonic BioImaging (Imagopole) and C2RT facilities at Institut Pasteur.
Extended data
Author contributions
N.H. designed the experiments. N.H., B.J., M.L., C. Petitdemange, C. Planchais, E.B., A.O.R. and P.R. performed the experiments. V.C. and R.L. coordinated the animal studies. B.J. was in charge of the ethical and safety protocols and coordinated the sample transports. N.H., C. Planchais, P.R., E.B. and C. Petitdemange analyzed the data and discussed them with all authors. H.M. and C. Planchais provided the anti-spike Abs and the recombinant spike protein. M.M.T. designed the initial project. M.M.T., F.R. and R.K.R. obtained the funding. N.H. and M.M.T. wrote the manuscript and all co-authors reviewed it.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Immunology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Ioana Visan, in collaboration with the Nature Immunology team. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its raw data files or are available from the authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The source code and related materials are available for access and download at Gene Expression Omnibus under references GSE243731, GSE243732, GSE243733 and GSE243734 for further examination and utilization.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41590-023-01661-4.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41590-023-01661-4.
References
- 1.Lamers MM, Haagmans BL. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:270–284. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00713-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Choudhary S, Sharma K, Silakari O. The interplay between inflammatory pathways and COVID-19: a critical review on pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Microb. Pathog. 2021;150:104673. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Patterson BK, et al. Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 protein in CD16+ monocytes in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 months post-infection. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:746021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.746021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stein SR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy. Nature. 2022;612:758–763. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05542-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Merad M, Martin JC. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:355–362. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0331-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hou F, Xiao K, Tang L, Xie L. Diversity of macrophages in lung homeostasis and diseases. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:53940. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.753940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nikitina E, Larionova I, Choinzonov E, Kzhyshkowska J. Monocytes and macrophages as viral targets and reservoirs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2821. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yao Y, et al. Surface translocation of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 upon TLR4/7/8 activation is required for SARS-CoV-2 infection in circulating monocytes. Cell Discov. 2022;8:89. doi: 10.1038/s41421-022-00453-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sefik E, et al. Inflammasome activation in infected macrophages drives COVID-19 pathology. Nature. 2022;606:585–593. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04802-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Björkström NK, Strunz B, Ljunggren H-G. Natural killer cells in antiviral immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022;22:112–123. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00558-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cook KD, Waggoner SN, Whitmire JK. NK cells and their ability to modulate T cells during virus infections. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2014;34:359–388. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2014010604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Manickam C, Sugawara S, Reeves RK. Friends or foes? The knowns and unknowns of natural killer cell biology in COVID-19 and other coronaviruses in July 2020. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008820. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schultze JL, Aschenbrenner AC. COVID-19 and the human innate immune system. Cell. 2021;184:1671. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bi J. NK cell dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2022;19:127–129. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00825-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maucourant C, et al. Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity. Sci. Immunol. 2020;5:eabd6832. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hammer Q, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 encodes for an HLA-E-stabilizing peptide that abrogates inhibition of NKG2A-expressing NK cells. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110503. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee MJ, et al. SARS-CoV-2 escapes direct NK cell killing through Nsp1-mediated downregulation of ligands for NKG2D. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111892. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Estes JD, Wong SW, Brenchley JM. Nonhuman primate models of human viral infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18:390–404. doi: 10.1038/s41577-018-0005-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bain CC, MacDonald AS. The impact of the lung environment on macrophage development, activation and function: diversity in the face of adversity. Mucosal Immunol. 2022;15:223–234. doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00480-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kaiser BK, et al. Interactions between NKG2x immunoreceptors and HLA-E ligands display overlapping affinities and thermodynamics. J. Immunol. 2005;174:2878–2884. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.5.2878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee N, et al. HLA-E is a major ligand for the natural killer inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:5199–5204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Braud VM, et al. HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C. Nature. 1998;391:795–799. doi: 10.1038/35869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ram DR, et al. Tracking KLRC2 (NKG2C)+ memory-like NK cells in SIV+ and rhCMV+ rhesus macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007104. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lin L, Spoor MS, Gerth AJ, Brody SL, Peng SL. Modulation of Th1 activation and inflammation by the NF-κB repressor Foxj1. Science. 2004;303:1017–1020. doi: 10.1126/science.1093889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Adams NM, et al. Transcription factor IRF8 orchestrates the adaptive natural killer cell response. Immunity. 2018;48:1172–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zheng M, et al. TLR2 senses the SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein to produce inflammatory cytokines. Nat. Immunol. 2021;22:829–838. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00937-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fontes-Dantas FL, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces TLR4-mediated long-term cognitive dysfunction recapitulating post-COVID-19 syndrome in mice. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112189. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Noh J-Y, Yoon SR, Kim T-D, Choi I, Jung H. Toll-like receptors in natural killer cells and their application for immunotherapy. J. Immunol. Res. 2020;2020:2045860. doi: 10.1155/2020/2045860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jeffery-Smith A, et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells can persist in the elderly who have lost detectable neutralizing antibodies. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132:e152042. doi: 10.1172/JCI152042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lemberg MK, Bland FA, Weihofen A, Braud VM, Martoglio B. Intramembrane proteolysis of signal peptides: an essential step in the generation of HLA-E epitopes. J. Immunol. 2001;167:6441–6446. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.11.6441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Braud V, Yvonne Jones E, McMichael A. The human major histocompatibility complex class Ib molecule HLA-E binds signal sequence-derived peptides with primary anchor residues at positions 2 and 9. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997;27:1164–1169. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oliveira CC, van Hall T. Alternative antigen processing for MHC class I: multiple roads lead to Rome. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:298. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bortolotti D, Gentili V, Rizzo S, Rotola A, Rizzo R. SARS-CoV-2 spike 1 protein controls natural killer cell activation via the HLA-E/NKG2A pathway. Cells. 2020;9:1975. doi: 10.3390/cells9091975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Walters LC, McMichael AJ, Gillespie GM. Detailed and atypical HLA-E peptide binding motifs revealed by a novel peptide exchange binding assay. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020;50:2075–2091. doi: 10.1002/eji.202048719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sensi M, et al. Peptides with dual binding specificity for HLA-A2 and HLA-E are encoded by alternatively spliced isoforms of the antioxidant enzyme peroxiredoxin 5. Int. Immunol. 2009;21:257–268. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lampen MH, et al. Alternative peptide repertoire of HLA-E reveals a binding motif that is strikingly similar to HLA-A2. Mol. Immunol. 2013;53:126–131. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Doremalen N, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 are attenuated in rhesus macaques as compared to Delta. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eade1860. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Holms RD. Long COVID (PASC) is maintained by a self-sustaining pro-inflammatory TLR4/RAGE-loop of S100A8/A9 > TLR4/RAGE signalling, inducing chronic expression of IL-1b, IL-6 and TNFa: anti-inflammatory ezrin peptides as potential therapy. Immuno. 2022;2:512–533. doi: 10.3390/immuno2030033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Keidar S, Strizevsky A, Raz A, Gamliel-Lazarovich A. ACE2 activity is increased in monocyte-derived macrophages from prehypertensive subjects. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2007;22:597–601. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Abassi Z, Knaney Y, Karram T, Heyman SN. The lung macrophage in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a friend or a foe? Front. Immunol. 2020;11:1312. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Uribe-Querol E, Rosales C. Control of phagocytosis by microbial pathogens. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:1368. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rockx B, et al. Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model. Science. 2020;368:1012–1015. doi: 10.1126/science.abb7314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pepe A, Pietropaoli S, Vos M, Barba-Spaeth G, Zurzolo C. Tunneling nanotubes provide a route for SARS-CoV-2 spreading. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabo0171. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mellett L, Khader SA. S100A8/A9 in COVID-19 pathogenesis: impact on clinical outcomes. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2022;63:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2021.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chancellor A, Gadola SD, Mansour S. The versatility of the CD1 lipid antigen presentation pathway. Immunology. 2018;154:196–203. doi: 10.1111/imm.12912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Arshad N, et al. SARS-CoV-2 accessory proteins ORF7a and ORF3a use distinct mechanisms to down-regulate MHC-I surface expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2023;120:e2208525120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208525120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Verweij MC, et al. Modulation of MHC-E transport by viral decoy ligands is required for RhCMV/SIV vaccine efficacy. Science. 2021;372:eabe9233. doi: 10.1126/science.abe9233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Maisonnasse P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine use against SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human primates. Nature. 2020;585:584–587. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2558-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Planchais C, et al. Potent human broadly SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing IgA and IgG antibodies effective against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2. J. Exp. Med. 2022;219:e20220638. doi: 10.1084/jem.20220638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Healy S, McMahon J, Owens P, Dockery P, FitzGerald U. Threshold-based segmentation of fluorescent and chromogenic images of microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in FIJI. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2018;295:87–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saad J, Fomich M, Día VP, Wang T. A novel automated protocol for ice crystal segmentation analysis using Cellpose and Fiji. Cryobiology. 2023;111:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Aldrich CJ, et al. Identification of a tap-dependent leader peptide recognized by alloreactive T cells specific for a class Ib antigen. Cell. 1994;79:649–658. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90550-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tey S-K, Khanna R. Autophagy mediates transporter associated with antigen processing-independent presentation of viral epitopes through MHC class I pathway. Blood. 2012;120:994–1004. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-402404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bland FA, Lemberg MK, McMichael AJ, Martoglio B, Braud VM. Requirement of the proteasome for the trimming of signal peptide-derived epitopes presented by the nonclassical major histocompatibility complex class I molecule HLA-E. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:33747–33752. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305593200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee N, Goodlett DR, Ishitani A, Marquardt H, Geraghty DE. HLA-E surface expression depends on binding of TAP-dependent peptides derived from certain HLA class I signal sequences. J. Immunol. 1998;160:4951–4960. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.160.10.4951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kraemer T, et al. HLA-E: presentation of a broader peptide repertoire impacts the cellular immune response—implications on HSCT outcome. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:346714. doi: 10.1155/2015/346714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Weinzierl AO, et al. Features of TAP-independent MHC class I ligands revealed by quantitative mass spectrometry. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008;38:1503–1510. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dalbey RE, Lively MO, Bron S, Dijl JMV. The chemistry and enzymology of the type I signal peptidases. Protein Sci. 1997;6:1129–1138. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Martoglio B, Dobberstein B. Signal sequences: more than just greasy peptides. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:410–415. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01360-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Auclair SM, Bhanu MK, Kendall DA. Signal peptidase I: cleaving the way to mature proteins. Protein Sci. 2012;21:13–25. doi: 10.1002/pro.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Weihofen A, Lemberg MK, Ploegh HL, Bogyo M, Martoglio B. Release of signal peptide fragments into the cytosol requires cleavage in the transmembrane region by a protease activity that is specifically blocked by a novel cysteine protease inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:30951–30956. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005980200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lyko F, Martoglio B, Jungnickel B, Rapoport TA, Dobberstein B. Signal sequence processing in rough microsomes. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:19873–19878. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.34.19873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Teufel F, et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;40:1023–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huot N, et al. Natural killer cells migrate into and control simian immunodeficiency virus replication in lymph node follicles in African green monkeys. Nat. Med. 2017;23:1277–1286. doi: 10.1038/nm.4421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Halldén G, Sköld CM, Eklund A, Forslid J, Hed J. Quenching of intracellular autofluorescence in alveolar macrophages permits analysis of fluorochrome labelled surface antigens by flow cytofluoremetry. J. Immunol. Methods. 1991;142:207–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(91)90108-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Huot N, et al. SIV-induced terminally differentiated adaptive NK cells in lymph nodes associated with enhanced MHC-E restricted activity. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1282. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21402-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wu X, Zhang Y, Li Y, Schmidt-Wolf IGH. Improvements in flow cytometry-based cytotoxicity assay. Cytometry A. 2021;99:680–688. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.24242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its raw data files or are available from the authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
The source code and related materials are available for access and download at Gene Expression Omnibus under references GSE243731, GSE243732, GSE243733 and GSE243734 for further examination and utilization.