Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2023 Nov 28;11(12):e8146. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8146

Prenatal sirenomelia diagnosis in the first trimester: A case report and literature review

Xiaqing Shi 1,2, Fengbei Kong 3, Guoru Wu 3, Yu Shi 3,
PMCID: PMC10683041  PMID: 38033683

Abstract

Key Clinical Message

Sirenomelia is a lethal condition in the perinatal period. The sonographic examination in the first trimester can effectively detect sirenomelia with a high degree of accuracy. Furthermore, vascular examinations using color flow imaging and augmented imaging techniques such as 3D sonography can improve diagnostic accuracy. Parents should get advice from a multidisciplinary team concerning sirenomelia care and prognosis as soon as possible.

Abstract

Sirenomelia is a rare condition with an uncommon congenital malformation; its most remarkable feature is lower extremity fusion with multiple visceral anomalies. Accordingly, the appearance resembles a mermaid's tail, hence mermaid syndrome. Sirenomelia has an incidence rate of 1.5–4.2 per 100,000 births, a male‐to‐female 2.7:1 ratio, and shows no differences across races. The condition is generally associated with renal agenesis, exterior genitalia defects, a single umbilical artery, and an imperforate anus. Here, we describe the first sirenomelia case in our hospital; a 13‐week‐old fetus with conjoined lower limbs was identified by ultrasound in the first trimester. We discuss this rare case with reference to the literature and provide insights on diagnosing this condition by ultrasound.

Keywords: caudal regression, fetal malformation, literature review, mermaid syndrome, sirenomelia


Grayscale cross‐sectional ultrasound imaging using a high‐frequency probe showing the fetus had two femurs (bold arrow), two tibiae (small arrow), and fibulae (large arrow).

graphic file with name CCR3-11-e8146-g005.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Sirenomelia is a rare, lethal congenital abnormality. It is distinguished by hypoplastic or atrophic inferior extremities with acute visceral malformations (genitourinary and gastrointestinal), vascular anomalies, and a single umbilical artery, which are manifested as multisystemic malformations associated with considerable phenotypic variability. 1 The incidence rate is reported to range from 1.5 to 4.2 per 100,000 births, with no differences between races, and a male‐to‐female 2.7:1 ratio. Approximately 2% of mothers have maternal diabetes, and the sirenomelia prevalence in monozygotic twins is 100–150 times higher when compared with single births. 1 , 2 Fetal survival predominantly relies on appropriate kidney function and adequate renal outflow. 3 However, for most fetuses with sirenomelia, death typically occurs during pregnancy or immediately after delivery.

Sirenomelia can be identified at any gestational age; the earliest abnormalities identified in fetal limb structures were determined by transvaginal ultrasound at approximately 9 weeks. 4 , 5 In China, according to fertility policies, pregnant women must attend hospital between 11 and 13 weeks to test for first‐trimester nuchal translucency (NT) thickness to screen for fetal deformities. Before the 11th week of gestation, we routinely observe for embryo or fetal viability, not for structural abnormalities. Here, we describe a case of sirenomelia diagnosed at the 13th week of gestation and characterize the condition with reference to the literature.

2. CASE REPORT

A 26‐year‐old primigravida female attended the Fetal Medicine Department of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital for a prenatal consultation at 13 + 5 weeks of gestation. She and her husband were nonconsanguineous and reported no conditions or congenital abnormalities in their family history. No previous history of drug abuse or radiation exposure was also recorded. This was the first time a primigravida female had been referred to the Ultrasound Department for routine NT screening. During the ultrasonographic scan, the length of the crown‐rump was 53 mm, which corresponded to a 12‐week and 3‐day gestation period, and the NT measured 3.2 mm, which exceeded the normal NT range (normal: 2.5–3.0 mm). Unusually, the fetus had a severe caudal malformation, with the ultrasound showing that the lower limbs were conjoined and moved in synchrony (Figure 1, right image). A single umbilical artery was detected by color flow imaging, and a single umbilical artery derived from the iliac vessel was identified (Figure 2). Also, renal tissue was not indicated, but amniotic fluid volume was normal, as were the four heart chambers and the stomach. The decision to terminate the pregnancy was proposed due to a mermaid malformation, and informed parental consent was obtained. After termination, an external examination of the fetus showed normal ears, tongue, and bilateral upper extremities with 10 thumbs, but the fetus lacked exterior genitalia and had a perforation of the anus. Following autopsy, bones in the lower limbs were fused below the knees, resulting in two complete feet that resembled a mermaid's tail (Figure 1, left image). A grayscale cross‐sectional and midline sagittal ultrasound image showed the fetus had two femurs, two tibiae, and fibulae (Figures 3 and 4). Furthermore, a postmortem chromosomal spread was normal; the gender of the fetus was not revealed. For academic research purposes, the parents did not consent to a clinical autopsy.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Autopsy showed that bones in the lower extremities below the knee had fused and ultimately formed two full feet, comparable to a mermaid's tail (left image, black arrows). A three‐dimensional ultrasound scan showed the fused lower extremity (right image, white hands).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Color Doppler imaging of the fetus showing an umbilical artery (small arrow) emanating from the iliac artery (large arrow).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Grayscale midline sagittal ultrasound imaging performed using a vaginal probe showed on separate view that the fetus had two tibiae and fibulae (red circles).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Grayscale cross‐sectional ultrasound imaging using a high‐frequency probe showing the fetus had two femurs (bold arrow), two tibiae (small arrow), and fibulae (large arrow).

3. DISCUSSION

Sirenomelia is a rare condition characterized by malformation of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems, fusion and skeletal abnormalities of the lower extremities, a single exceptional umbilical artery, and Potter's facies. 6 However, etiological mechanisms underlying this deformity remain unclear. Although several mechanisms have been proposed to explain mermaid syndrome, for example, maternal diabetes, genetic vulnerability, caudal mesoderm deficiency, lateral compression by amniotic folds, and a lack of blood supply in the posterior region leading to mechanical defects, the vascular theft hypothesis remains the most plausible. 7 , 8 , 9 It is believed that sirenomelia is caused by vitelline artery stealing in early embryonic development; the umbilical artery is directly attached to the higher‐positioned abdominal aorta. Stealing blood vessels from the abnormal vitelline artery can result in decreased blood flow to the embryo tail, which inhibits embryonic development and causes embryonic malformation in the affected legs and organs. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 Consequently, different visceral defects arise and are manifested as heart defects, lung hypoplasia, absence of genitalia, and anorectal anus. 13 However, unlike previous cases in the literature, our ultrasound observations showed that the umbilical artery was derived from the iliac artery and not from the high abdominal aorta. However, owing to parental disapproval of a clinical autopsy for academic research, our theory could not be corroborated. In sirenomelia cases without vascular theft, several studies have suggested other factors could be involved in sirenomelia pathogenesis. 14 Teratogens such as retinoic acid, cyclophosphamide, and cadmium have been identified in animal research. 15 , 16 Several genetic factors associated with sirenomelia, which contributed to caudal degeneration syndrome, were also reported, with possible multifactorial polygenic inheritance, dominant sex‐linked inheritance, and autosomal dominant inheritance with variable expression and attenuated epistasis. 17

Essentially, a sirenomelia diagnosis is difficult to establish during the second trimester due to diminished amniotic fluid volumes, which are linked to urinary tract agenesis or dysgenesis. 18 Insufficient amniotic fluid may limit the diagnosis of a lower limb deformity because renal hypoplasia results in anuria, which is critical for determining the amount of amniotic fluid, so severe oligohydramnios cases are diagnosed as malformations after birth. 4 In cases where oligohydramnios occurs due to bilateral renal hypoplasia, this may hinder the precise scanning of fetal malformations. 19 Color and power Doppler ultrasound are important for determining a prenatal diagnosis by showing a single greater vitelline artery, which arises from the proximal abdominal aorta, enters the iliac vessels without branches in the fetal pelvis, and enters the umbilical cord ventrally. 20 More importantly, two‐ or three‐dimensional ultrasound has shown success in the first trimester, particularly the latter technique, as it provides practical clinical value for a sirenomelia prognosis. 21 , 22 , 23

A sirenomelia diagnosis may be easier in the first trimester because amniotic fluid volume levels are comparatively normal and are secreted in the first trimester from the amniotic membrane covering the placenta and umbilical cord. 24 , 25 , 26 The sirenomelia case reported here, which was diagnosed during the 13th week, was readily explored at this gestational age, fetus is enveloped by amniotic fluid, and the fetal head, heart, kidneys, umbilical cord, and extremities can be better displayed. Additionally, the most typical findings for sirenomelia include lower extremity fusion, thus our case was consistent with the literature. 27 , 28 Currently, the most widely used sirenomelia classification system is that proposed by Stocker and Heifetz 29 (Table 1); therefore, our case was assigned to category 1.

TABLE 1.

Sirenomelia classification by Stocker and Heifetz. 29

Type Characteristics
I All thigh and leg bones present
II Single fibula
III Absent fibula
IV Partially fused femurs, fused fibula
V Partially fused femurs, absent fibula
VI Single femur, single tibia
VII Single femur, absent tibia

In terms of a differential diagnosis, it is vital to consider bilateral renal agenesis, megacystis, VACTER (vertebral, anal, cardiac, tracheal, esophageal, renal, and limb [congenital pattern]) association, and caudal regression syndrome (CRS). 6 , 30 , 31 Currently, the majority of studies perceive sirenomelia and CRS as different nosologic conditions that require exclusive genetic counseling. 32 In mermaid syndrome, the vagal blood vessels that arise from the vitelline artery in the fetus originate from the upper abdominal aorta and perform umbilical artery functions, transporting blood from the umbilical cord to the placenta, due to acute hypoperfusion of tissue in distal regions supplied by the abdominal aorta, resulting in extreme deformities of the spine, kidneys, lower gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, and genitalia. 9 Additionally, some studies have proposed that mermaid syndrome is more serious than CRS, with both sharing common vascular features. 33 Sirenomelia manifests with more severe caudal hypoplasia when compared with CRS; it presents with a single abnormal umbilical artery, absence of an anus, and lower extremity fusion into a single limb, which causes the typical mermaid‐like appearance. Additionally, acute renal hypoplasia contributes to oligohydramnion. In contrast, CRS manifests with two umbilical arteries, hypoplasia of both lower extremities, nonlethal kidney manifestations, and an imperforate or normal anus. 7 , 8 , 30 , 34 , 35

Sirenomelia is a rare congenital anomaly, the prognosis of which depends on the extent of the deformity. A fetal prognosis may be improved as long as there are no severe cardio or neurological deficiencies. Additionally, survival and short‐term prognosis depend largely on adequate renal functions and outflow. 3 Long‐term problems incorporate bladder nerve dysfunction, progressive kidney damage, and paralysis caused by neuromuscular defects in the lower extremities. 36 , 37 Our case demonstrated that bone fusion below the knee and multiple absent pelvic organs were not compatible with postpartum life.

4. CONCLUSIONS

Mermaid syndrome is a rare disorder with a poor prognosis. Much debate has ensued on disease pathogenesis and the etiology that predispose to the condition. Ultrasound, although difficult, can be used to make an antenatal diagnosis. When combined with prenatal screening and related fertility policies in China, we conclude that the NT period is the most appropriate time to recognize the condition. Although not part of routine screening for six common lethal malformations, the conventional inspection of fetal extremities during this period could facilitate the earlier recognition of fused extremity malformations and provide clues for ultrasonographers to diagnose this rare condition. Similarly, a greater emphasis should be placed on proper prenatal diagnosis and care, with early termination recommended if sirenomelia is detected.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Xiaqing Shi: Writing – original draft. Fengbei Kong: Resources. Guoru Wu: Resources. Yu Shi: Supervision.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

CONSENT

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.

Shi X, Kong F, Wu G, Shi Y. Prenatal sirenomelia diagnosis in the first trimester: A case report and literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e8146. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8146

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Davies J, Chazen E, Nance WE. Symmelia in one of monozygotic twins. Teratology. 1971;4(3):367‐378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sirtori M, Ghidini A, Romero R, Hobbins JC. Prenatal diagnosis of sirenomelia. J Ultrasound Med. 1989;8(2):83‐88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Pinette MG, Hand M, Hunt RC, Blackstone J, Wax JR, Cartin A. Surviving sirenomelia. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(11):1555‐1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Monteagudo A, Mayberry P, Rebarber A, Paidas M, Timor‐Tritsch IE. Sirenomelia sequence: first‐trimester diagnosis with both two‐ and three‐dimensional sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(8):915‐920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Timor‐Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Peisner DB. High‐frequency transvaginal sonographic examination for the potential malformation assessment of the 9‐week to 14‐week fetus. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992;20(4):231‐238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Garrido‐Allepuz C, Haro E, Gonzalez‐Lamuno D, et al. A clinical and experimental overview of sirenomelia: insight into the mechanisms of congenital limb malformations. Dis Model Mech. 2011;4(3):289‐299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Twickler D, Budorick N, Pretorius D, Grafe M, Currarino G. Caudal regression versus sirenomelia: sonographic clues. J Ultrasound Med. 1993;12(6):323‐330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Duhamel B. From the mermaid to anal imperforation: the syndrome of caudal regression. Arch Dis Child. 1961;36(186):152‐155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Stevenson RE, Jones KL, Phelan MC, et al. Vascular steal: the pathogenetic mechanism producing sirenomelia and associated defects of the viscera and soft tissues. Pediatrics. 1986;78(3):451‐457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ramphul K, Mejias SG, Ramphul‐Sicharam Y. Mermaid syndrome: a case report in mauritius. Cureus. 2018;10(2):e2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kavunga EK, Bunduki GK, Mumbere M, Masumbuko CK. Sirenomelia associated with an anterior abdominal wall defect: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2019;13(1):213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Morales‐Rosello J, Loscalzo G, Buongiorno S, et al. Sirenomelia, case report and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(6):1203‐1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stevenson RE. Common pathogenesis for sirenomelia, OEIS complex, limb‐body wall defect, and other malformations of caudal structures. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185(5):1379‐1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jaiyesimi F, Gomathinayagam T, Dixit A, Amer M. Sirenomelia without vitelline artery steal. Ann Saudi Med. 1998;18(6):542‐544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hilbelink DR, Kaplan S. Sirenomelia: analysis in the cadmium‐ and lead‐treated golden hamster. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1986;6(5):431‐440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Padmanabhan R. Retinoic acid‐induced caudal regression syndrome in the mouse fetus. Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12(2):139‐151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Welch JP, Aterman K. The syndrome of caudal dysplasia: a review, including etiologic considerations and evidence of heterogeneity. Pediatr Pathol. 1984;2(3):313‐327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sepulveda W, Romero R, Pryde PG, Wolfe HM, Addis JR, Cotton DB. Prenatal diagnosis of sirenomelus with color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(5 Pt 1):1377‐1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. McCoy MC, Chescheir NC, Kuller JA, Altman GC, Flannagan LM. A fetus with sirenomelia, omphalocele, and meningomyelocele, but normal kidneys. Teratology. 1994;50(2):168‐171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zeki YM, Yusuf AA, Hassan FM, et al. Mermaid syndrome: a case report in somalia. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;76:103533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sepulveda W, Martinez JL, Moenne K. Sirenomelia (symelia dipus). Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35(9):931‐933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Patel S, Suchet I. The role of color and power Doppler ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of sirenomelia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(6):684‐691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sepulveda W, Corral E, Sanchez J, Carstens E, Schnapp C. Sirenomelia sequence versus renal agenesis: prenatal differentiation with power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11(6):445‐449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Clemente CM, Farina M, Cianci A, Iraci Sareri M. Sirenomelia with oligodactylia: early ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic embryoscopic diagnosis during the first trimester of gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;28(1):43‐45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Akbayir O, Gungorduk K, Sudolmus S, Gulkilik A, Ark C. First trimester diagnosis of sirenomelia: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(6):589‐592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lind T, Kendall A, Hytten FE. The role of the fetus in the formation of amniotic fluid. BJOG. 1972;79(4):289‐298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Schiesser M, Holzgreve W, Lapaire O, et al. Sirenomelia, the mermaid syndrome – detection in the first trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23(6):493‐495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Valenzano M, Paoletti R, Rossi A, et al. Sirenomelia. Pathological features, antenatal ultrasonographic clues, and a review of current embryogenic theories. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(1):82‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Stocker JT, Heifetz SA. Sirenomelia. A morphological study of 33 cases and review of the literature. Perspect Pediatr Pathol. 1987;10:7‐50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Boer LL, Morava E, Klein WM, Schepens‐Franke AN, Oostra RJ. Sirenomelia: a multi‐systemic polytopic field defect with ongoing controversies. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(10):791‐804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Contu R, Zoppi MA, Axiana C, Ibba RM, Monni G. First trimester diagnosis of sirenomelia by 2D and ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;26(1):41‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schuler L, Salzano FM. Patterns in multimalformed babies and the question of the relationship between sirenomelia and VACTERL. Am J Med Genet. 1994;49(1):29‐35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Seidahmed MZ, Abdelbasit OB, Alhussein KA, Miqdad AM, Khalil MI, Salih MA. Sirenomelia and severe caudal regression syndrome. Saudi Med J. 2014;35(Suppl 1):S36‐S43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Das BB, Rajegowda BK, Bainbridge R, et al. Caudal regression syndrome versus sirenomelia: a case report. J Perinatol. 2002;22(2):168‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Blaicher W, Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. Sirenomelia: early prenatal diagnosis with combined two‐ and three‐dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(6):542‐543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ayaz UY, Dilli A, Api A. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of congenital hydrometrocolpos in prenatal and newborn period: a case report. Med Ultrason. 2011;13(3):234‐236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yıldırım G, Gungorduk K, Aslan H, Sudolmus S, Ark C, Saygın S. Prenatal diagnosis of imperforate hymen with hydrometrocolpos. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(5):483‐485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES