Abstract
The USP19 deubiquitinase is found in a locus associated with Parkinson’s Disease (PD), interacts with chaperonins, and promotes secretion of α-synuclein (α-syn) through the misfolding-associated protein secretion (MAPS) pathway. Since these processes might modulate the processing of α-syn aggregates in PD, we inactivated USP19 (KO) in mice expressing the A53T mutation of α-syn and in whom α-syn preformed fibrils (PFF) had been injected in the striatum. Compared to WT, KO brains showed decreased accumulation of phospho-synuclein (pSyn) positive aggregates. This improvement was associated with less activation of microglia and improved performance in a tail-suspension test. Exposure of primary neurons from WT and KO mice to PFF in vitro also led to decreased accumulation of pSyn aggregates. KO did not affect uptake of PFF nor propagation of aggregates in the cultured neurons. We conclude that USP19 instead modulates intracellular dynamics of aggregates. At an early time following PFF injection when the number of pSyn-positive neurons were similar in WT and KO brains, the KO neurons contained less aggregates. KO brain aggregates stained more intensely with anti-ubiquitin antibodies. Immunoprecipitation of soluble proteins from WT and KO brains with antibodies to pSyn showed higher levels of ubiquitinated oligomeric species in the KO samples. We propose that the improved pathology in USP19 KO brains may arise from decreased formation or enhanced clearance of the more ubiquitinated aggregates and/or enhanced disassembly towards more soluble oligomeric species. USP19 inhibition may represent a novel therapeutic approach that targets the intracellular dynamics of α-syn complexes.
Subject terms: Parkinson's disease, Cellular neuroscience
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease and is characterized by motor and non-motor dysfunctions due to the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons. Current therapies target primarily symptoms and are often hampered by adverse effects. With age as the greatest risk factor and the predicted growth in the elderly population, the prevalence of PD is expected to increase rapidly. Therefore, it is imperative to define pathogenetic mechanisms to identify new therapeutic targets.
A pathological hallmark of PD is the hierarchical and progressive spread of intracellular misfolded protein inclusions, termed Lewy bodies (LBs), between interconnected brain regions1,2. One of the major components of LBs is α-synuclein (α-syn), an abundant brain protein accumulated in both sporadic and familial forms of PD as well as in other related disorders collectively termed synucleopathies. Under normal conditions, α-syn predominantly localizes in axons where it regulates presynaptic vesicle trafficking and neurotransmitter release by acting as a SNARE complex chaperone3. A-syn is an intrinsically unstructured protein natively occurring as monomers which are prone to misfolding and fibril formation4. Mutations, posttranslational modifications as well as association with chaperones can modulate its propensity to aggregate5–7. Indeed, several α-syn missense mutations (A30P8, E46K9, A53T10, A53E11, H50Q12, and G51D13) as well as duplication14 and triplication15 of the α-syn gene SNCA all cause familial PD. Importantly, α-syn -containing aggregates can propagate between brain cells, which was initially suggested by the observation that grafted fetal mesencephalic neurons stained positively for α-syn pathology years after transplantation into the brain of PD patients16,17. Since then, several studies confirmed the transmission of α-syn aggregates in animal models18–20. Moreover, transmitted α-syn can act as seeds converting monomeric α-syn in recipient cells into toxic oligomers or fibrils, thus amplifying α-syn aggregation-associated cytotoxicity in neurons21–23. Thus, pathways that actively participate in the transmission of aggregated α-syn are of interest as targets for treatment of PD and other diseases associated with protein misfolding and prion-like spread. To date, two mechanisms have been proposed to mediate the intercellular spreading of α-syn aggregates: intercellular nanotubes or secretion of α-syn by unconventional pathways followed by its internalization by naïve neurons.
The internalization of fibrillar α-syn takes place, at least in part, via dynamin-dependent endocytosis24. Studies have reported different cell surface candidates that recruit α-syn to the plasma membrane to mediate its uptake. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) comprise several plasma membrane and extracellular glycoproteins that can mediate the recruitment and internalization of many cargos including fibrillar α-syn but not soluble oligomers in both neuronal-like cells25,26 and in primary neurons27. A-syn is constitutively acetylated at the N terminus which appears to be important for binding to membrane N-glycans in primary neurons and neuroblastoma cells but not HEK cells. The cleavage of N-glycans reduces the internalization of α-syn monomers and preformed fibrils (PFF). This study also demonstrated that the depletion of the membrane glycoprotein neurexin 1β blocked the entry of acetylated α-syn monomers and PFF28. A recent study in U2OS and iPSC-derived human dopaminergic neurons and astrocytes reported that α-syn PFF are internalized via macropinocytosis and trafficked to lysosomes and multivesicular bodies within minutes of exposure. These findings put in question previous reports that are in favor of α-syn internalization via dynamin-dependent endocytosis29.
Although significant insights have been obtained on α-syn uptake, much less is known about how it is released from cells. A-syn lacks a secretory sequence and therefore is not secreted via the conventional ER-Golgi pathway. Several lines of evidence suggest that α-syn can be secreted via non-canonical vesicle-mediated exocytosis. While a small fraction of extracellular α-syn appears to be released together with exosomes29,30, other studies suggested an exosome-independent unconventional protein secretion pathway termed as misfolding-associated protein secretion (MAPS) to specifically target misfolded proteins including α-syn and tau for secretion31–33. MAPS can be initiated when misfolded proteins are recruited by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-embedded deubiquitinase USP19. Subsequently, cargo proteins are handled by HSP70 and its co-chaperone DNAJC5, before they enter the lumen of a peri-nuclear membrane compartment and late endosomes34. Cargos are further directed to the cell exterior or to lysosomes for degradation.
In addition to protein secretion and lysosomal degradation, USP19 has also been implicated in degradation of two major autophagy players Beclin 135 and TBK136. Given the reported association of USP19 with two major cytosolic chaperones HSC70 and HSP9037,38, it is anticipated to function as a key ubiquitin processing enzyme in protein homeostasis regulation. In view of these functions of USP19 in proteostasis and the recent recognition that it is located in a locus on chromosome 3 that is associated with Parkinson’s disease39, (https://pdgenetics.shinyapps.io/GWASBrowser/), we tested whether USP19 regulates α-syn processing and/or propagation in PD pathology. We used USP19 KO mice to study the effects of USP19 depletion on PD-like pathology in vivo and in primary neurons. We report that USP19 depletion significantly reduces pSyn pathology in a mouse model expressing the human α-syn A53T disease-causing mutation as well as in primary neurons and that this effect is primarily due to altered intracellular handling of pathological species of α-syn.
Results
USP19 is expressed in the adult mouse brain
USP19 is expressed as two major isoforms – one cytoplasmic and the other ER localized - which arise from alternative splicing of the final exon that encodes a transmembrane domain. As antibodies that recognize the small differences in amino acid sequence are not available, we first characterized the expression and localization of USP19 mRNA in mouse brains by in-situ hybridization with USP19 oligo probes specifically recognizing mRNAs of different USP19 isoforms. The USP19-ER isoform (USP19-ER), which specifically mediates the MAPS pathway, was detected across multiple regions of the USP19 WT but not the KO brains (Fig. 1a, b). Specifically, USP19-ER mRNA was present in neurons (identified as NeuN positive) including dopaminergic tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive neurons (Fig. 1c). Additionally, USP19-ER mRNA was also detected in astrocytes and microglia (Fig. 1c). Similarly, oligo probes targeting specifically the USP19 cytoplasmic isoform (USP19-cyt) and well as both isoforms (USP19 common) mRNA confirmed that the cytosolic isoform is also expressed in the mouse brain (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Immunoblotting of protein from whole-brain homogenates confirmed the expression of USP19 protein in WT and its absence in KO animals (Fig. 1d). These data confirm the expression of USP19 in the mouse brain and suggest a possible role for USP19 in protein homeostasis in various cell types in this tissue.
Loss of USP19 improves pSyn and pTau pathology in a PD-like mouse brain
To explore the involvement of USP19 in PD pathology, we crossed USP19 WT and KO mice to a transgenic line expressing the human PD-causing mutant α-synA53T (M83 hemizygous transgene [M83hem]) under the CNS prion promoter40. M83hem mice spontaneously develop age-dependent motor impairment leading to paralysis between 22 and 28 months of age, but the propagation of ectopically expressed α-syn is not obvious40. To accelerate the development of α-syn propagation and the associated PD-like pathology in a robust manner in a mouse model, we injected PFF or control α-syn monomers in the dorsal striatum at 3 months of age, which typically leads to Lewy body-like pathology and motor defects within 3–4 months41. At the onset of motor symptoms (90–110 days post-injection [dpi]), mice were sacrificed, and the brains analyzed by immunohistochemistry. To detect Lewy body-like pathology, we used a validated phosphoS129-syn (pSyn) antibody (Supplementary Fig. 2a) to stain coronal brain sections, which revealed widespread accumulation of pSyn, a hallmark of Lewy body pathology in PD, in WT mice injected with α-syn PFF. Consistent with previous studies42, no pSyn-containing cells were found in KO or WT animals that had been injected with α-syn monomers (Fig. 2a, b). In general, more pSyn signals were detected on the ipsilateral side (side of injection) than the contralateral side, suggesting that the Lewy body-like pathology occurs first in the injected region and later spreads to the contralateral side of the brain. Interestingly, fewer pSyn-positive (pSyn+) cells were detected in USP19 KO mice exposed to PFF in many of the ipsilateral brain regions including the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), striatum (Str), periaqueductal gray (PAG), piriform cortex (Piri; Fig. 2a, b), cortex (Ctx), hippocampus (Hippo), hypothalamus (Hypo), midbrain, olfactory bulb (OB) and thalamus (Thal; Supplementary Fig. 2b). Similarly, the number of pSyn+ cells was significantly reduced in the KO contralateral PAG, Piri (Fig. 2a, b), and Hypo (Supplementary Fig. 2b) compared to WT counterparts. Integrating the results from all the individual regions of the brain showed that although some ipsilateral regions were more affected by USP19 KO than their contralateral counterparts (SNc, Str, and PAG) (Supplementary Fig. 2c), an overall significant reduction in pSyn pathology was found in KO ipsi- and contralateral regions compared to the counterpart regions in WT animals (Fig. 2c), suggesting a less efficient progression of the PD-like pathology in the brains of USP19 KO animals than in WT brains. Interestingly, we observed higher levels of pSyn pathology in USP19 WT females relative to WT males (Supplementary Fig. 2f, g) which could be due to the positive regulation of USP19 expression by estrogen43.
To begin exploring whether the reduction in pSyn was due to slower propagation or differential formation/clearance of α-syn aggregates over time in the KO mice, we performed the same analysis at an earlier timepoint post-PFF injection. At 60 dpi, there was no difference in the number of pSyn+ cells between WT and KO animals suggesting that pSyn pathology develops initially in similar number of cells and therefore USP19 may not be involved in the initial cell-to-cell propagation mechanism (Fig. 2d). As pSyn+ aggregates localize not only to the cell body (Lewy body-like structures) but also to neurites (Lewy neurite-like structures), we analyzed the total area of pSyn+ staining in several brain regions between WT and KO animals at both 60 and 90–110 dpi. A significantly smaller pSyn+ area was found in both ipsi- and contralateral regions of KO compared to WT animals (Fig. 2e). Interestingly, the reduction in pSyn+ area is already apparent at 60 dpi at a time when the number of pSyn+ cells are similar. These data indicate that the loss of USP19 decreases the intraneuronal accumulation of pSyn pathology and that this difference increases over time post-injection of PFFs.
To confirm and extend these findings, we quantified by immunoblotting, pSyn and total α-syn in TBS-soluble (Tris-Buffed Saline-solubilized; Supplementary Fig. 2d, e) and TBS-insoluble fractions (TBS-insoluble, SDS-solubilized) of homogenates prepared from ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres (Fig. 2f, g) as the presence of insoluble pSyn is another hallmark of Lewy body pathology. There was significantly less TBS-insoluble pSyn (15-kDa band representing SDS-solubilized pSyn) in both ipsi and contralateral KO brains when compared to WT brains. A significant reduction in high MW pSyn species (>15 kDa, reflecting likely posttranslationally-modified pSyn or complexes resistant to SDS dissociation) was also seen in the KO brain. Additionally, we detected a significant decrease in insoluble high MW total α-syn species in contra and a similar trend in ipsi KO brains (Fig. 2g). By contrast, total TBS-insoluble monomeric α-syn (15-kDa band representing SDS-solubilized α-syn) was largely unchanged between genotypes. There was no difference between WT and KO in TBS-soluble total α-syn and pSyn (Supplementary Fig. 2d, e). Thus, there were decreased levels of specifically pathological forms of α-syn (phosphorylated and insoluble) in the KO brains.
Cooccurrence of pathological accumulation of α-syn and tau has been reported in AD and PD suggesting these proteins may synergistically interact to promote the accumulation of each other44–48. Therefore, we hypothesized that USP19 could also regulate the level of tau pathology in the M83 mouse model which develops tau inclusions49. To analyze the degree of tau pathology, we first validated the specificity of the pTau antibody (Supplementary Fig. 2a) and then quantified pTau levels in SNc by immunofluorescence (IF). Interestingly, pTau inclusions were significantly reduced in ipsi SNc with a similar trend in contralateral SNc of KO mice (Fig. 2h). Western blot analysis corroborated our imaging data and revealed a significant reduction of total brain insoluble pTau in ipsilateral hemisphere with a less evident difference in the contralateral hemispheres in KO animals (Fig. 2i). Thus, USP19 regulates both α-syn and tau aggregate accumulation.
Loss of USP19 reduces PD-pathology-associated neuroinflammation in mice
Neuroinflammation is a prominent hallmark of PD and many rodent PD models and a key contributor to the pathogenesis of the disease50–53. In response to various insults, including the administration of PFF, microglia undergo deramification and exhibit an amoeboid morphology during the neuroinflammatory response54–56. To determine whether the loss of USP19 results in changes of microglia morphology post-PFF administration, we measured the mean size of Iba1-positive (Iba1+, marker of microglia) cells by immunostaining. We found that microglia were significantly smaller in the ipsilateral midbrains of KO compared to WT animals, with a trend to a similar reduction in the contralateral midbrains (Fig. 3a, b). Infiltration of microglial cells to the site of inflammation to combat infection and phagocytose cell debris is another indicator of increased neuroinflammation54–56, which can be determined by measuring the density of Iba1+ staining. Therefore, we assessed microglial density by measuring total Iba1+ area. There was a ~50% decrease in Iba1+ cell density in KO ipsi- and contralateral midbrain compared to WT brains (Fig. 3a, b). Moreover, analysis of additional brain regions revealed a decrease in both ipsi- and contralateral microglia size and density in KO + PFF mice (Fig. 3c, d). In further support of this, immunoblot analysis revealed decreased astrocytic (GFAP) and microglia (Iba1) markers in total brain homogenates of KO animals (Fig. 3e, f). Taken together, the loss of USP19 leads to a decrease in the neuroinflammatory response which is consistent with the reduced pSyn pathology in the KO animals.
Loss of USP19 improves synaptic markers and behavioral outcome in PD-like mice
The overexpression of M83 transgene and intrastriatal PFF inoculation has been previously shown to trigger a progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra characterized by lower levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), an enzyme involved in dopamine production41,42. As the loss of USP19 led to a decrease in pSyn and pTau pathology and reduced neuroinflammation in PD-like mice, we hypothesized that these changes may result in a neuroprotective phenotype and lead to decreased neurodegeneration in KO animals. To explore this, we measured markers of dopaminergic neurons. Immunoblot analysis of whole ipsi- and contralateral brain homogenates revealed in KO + PFF brains, a trend to higher protein levels in ipsilateral TH, a significant increase in ipsilateral synaptotagmin-1, a presynaptic calcium sensor, and contralateral SNAP25, a presynaptic vesicle marker and SNARE complex member (Fig. 4a, b). The higher protein levels in the KO brain suggest that USP19 loss may partially protect against neurodegeneration.
As previously shown, M83 and PFF-inoculated mice develop motor and cognitive function deficits related to PD42,52,57. To assess the effect of USP19 loss on both motor and cognitive functions in PD-like mice, we performed behavioral phenotyping. Although no differences between WT and KO mice injected with PFF were detected in wire hang, grip strength or rotarod tests (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c), KO animals showed a significant improvement in mobile time in the tail-suspension test (TST). The absence of mobility in TST relates to the inability to get to the upright position which can reflect a defect in motor function, but may also reflect decreased motivation to do so (Fig. 4c). Finally, a survival experiment showed no improvement in overall survival rate in USP19 KO mice. In addition, no differences in survival were reported between sexes (Figs. 4d, S3a). However, KO mice were smaller in weight (Fig. S3b) which may be a confounding factor that impairs survival under stress conditions. Taken together with the pathological findings described above, the loss of USP19 leads to a favorable brain phenotype in PFF-injected mice, but no apparent beneficial effect on overall survival.
The loss of USP19 in neuronal cells reduces pSyn+ fibrils without affecting uptake of fibrils or propagation to other neurons
We next used primary neurons to explore the potential mechanisms underlying USP19’s neuronal protective role against pSyn accumulation. PFF treatment of primary rodent neurons leads to a progressive accumulation of pSyn+ fibrils resulting in ~20% cells death at 11 days post treatment (dpt)27. To investigate whether the loss of USP19 affects the levels of pSyn in neuronal cells, we generated USP19 WT/M83hem and KO/M83hem primary mouse cortical neurons and performed IF imaging. As expected, PFF treatment led to a time-dependent pSyn accumulation in both USP19 WT and KO neurons. However, there was ~50% reduction in pSyn fibrils at 10 dpt in KO neurons when compared to WT (Fig. 5a, b). To verify that this effect was not due to differences in PFF internalization between WT and KO neurons, we performed live- and fixed-cell time course measurements of uptake of fluorescently labeled PFFs. We observed that uptake begins at 1 h of PFF exposure. PFFs are then gradually trafficked into LAMP1-positive lysosomes. We found no difference in the rates of internalization of PFFs between WT and KO neurons (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5a, b). We next used cell viability assays to assess differences in PFF-induced cell death between WT and KO cells which could underlie the effect on pSyn accumulation. PFF treatment led to ~20% cell death at 10 dpt in both USP19 WT and KO neurons (Fig. 5c). No differences in cell viability were observed in the absence of exposure to PFF. We also tested whether the loss of USP19 affected viability during neuronal differentiation and maturation in culture which could predispose KO neurons to lower pSyn accumulation. We did not observe any differences in maturation viability between genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 5c).
We next used immunoblot analysis to assess α-syn and pSyn species in WT and KO cells exposed to PFF. Cell lysates were subjected to centrifugation to try to isolate insoluble aggregates, but none were detectable probably due to the minimal amount of insoluble protein available from these primary neuronal cultures. In the soluble fraction, we did see a time-dependent increase in both monomeric and high molecular weight (M.W. bands >19–150 kDa) pSyn species in both WT and KO neurons. At 10 dpt, there was a small, but statistically significant increase in higher molecular weight species of pSyn in KO compared to WT neurons, possibly due to multiple posttranslational modifications, oligomerization, fragmentation of aggregates or combinations of these (Fig. 5d, e). The increase in soluble high molecular weight species in KO neurons contrasts with the decrease in insoluble high molecular weight species in KO brain (Fig. 2g) raising the possibility that USP19 regulates the dynamics between soluble and insoluble pSyn species. To further explore this, we conducted a proximity ligation assay with α-syn antibodies which can detect oligomers on these USP19 KO and WT primary neurons58. Indeed, α-syn oligomeric species were more abundant in USP19 KO neurons, particularly at 4 and 8 days post exposure to PFFs (Fig. 5f, g). The oligomers detected were not simply fragments of internalized PFFs as performing the PLA assay on cells exposed to fluorescently labeled PFFs resulted in only a small amount of overlap between the PLA signals and the fluorescent PFFs (Fig. 5h). Thus, USP19 may indeed promote the accumulation of aggregates from oligomeric species. Oligomers detected by PLA decreased over time in culture (Fig. 5g) whereas those detected by immunoblot analysis increased over time (Fig. 5d). This may reflect the fact that the two assays do not detect identical species of synuclein. The immunoblot analysis is specific to pSyn whereas PLA should detect a broader range of oligomers including oligomers that can be dissociated upon exposure to the SDS in Laemmli sample buffer and therefore not detected by the immunoblot assay. Regardless of the assay, oligomers in the soluble fraction were at a higher level in the KO neurons.
To test whether USP19 is involved in neuron-to-neuron propagation of α-syn pathology in an in vitro system, we used a microfluidic device that compartmentalizes PFF-receiving and non-receiving neurons which are in contact solely via axons. We then observed the development of pSyn pathology in the non-PFF exposed WT and KO neurons. We did not observe any differences in pSyn development in the non-exposed neurons regardless of whether WT or KO neurons were exposed to PFFs, suggesting that neuronal USP19 is not involved in neuron-to-neuron propagation mechanism of α-syn (Supplementary Fig. 6).
The loss of USP19 increases ubiquitination of α-syn containing aggregates
Since Lewy body inclusions are known to be ubiquitinated, we tested whether loss of the USP19 deubiquitinase might increase ubiquitination of α-syn. We therefore co-stained sections of WT and USP19 KO brains from animals treated with α-syn PFF with antibodies against pSyn and ubiquitin (Ub). We showed that pSyn+ aggregates are more ubiquitinated in many regions of the brains of USP19 KO animals (Fig. 6a–c). To explore this biochemically, we immunoprecipitated pSyn from the soluble fractions of brain lysates of USP19 KO and WT animals under denaturing conditions. (The insoluble fractions were solubilized in 5% SDS and so could not be immunoprecipitated under such denaturing conditions.) Immunoblotting of the immunoprecipitates with anti-ubiquitin antibodies identified bands that were also positive when stained with anti-pSyn antibodies (Fig. 6d). Several of these bands recognized by anti-ubiquitin antibodies were increased in the samples from KO brains consistent with the increased ubiquitination of pSyn seen using the immunohistochemical analyses (Fig. 6e). We also explored whether USP19 regulates the ubiquitination levels of pSyn and α-syn in WT and KO primary neurons at 10 dpt with PFF or PBS. Protein from the lysates were immunoprecipitated under non-denaturing conditions with anti-Ub antibodies and the pellets blotted with anti-pSyn or anti-syn antibodies. Multiple discrete bands 25 kDa or larger as well as high molecular weight smears were seen in PFF-treated neurons that were either not detectable or diminished in the PBS treated neurons (Fig. S7a, b). Bands at ~15 kDa, the size of monomeric α-syn, or smaller were also detected which may reflect monomers or fragments of α-syn that were in complex with ubiquitinated α-syn under these non-denaturing conditions. Quantification revealed significantly higher levels of ubiquitinated α-syn and a strong tendency to an increase in ubiquitinated pSyn in KO neurons treated with PFF (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). Reverse immunoprecipitation with anti-pSyn and blotting of the pellets with anti-Ub antibody confirmed our results of significantly higher levels of ubiquitinated pSyn in the KO (Fig. S7c). Control immunoblots confirmed that the immunoprecipitations were successful in pulling down ubiquitinated proteins and total pSyn (Supplementary Fig. 7d–f). These results indicate that USP19 regulates the ubiquitination of pSyn, but cannot exclude the modulation of ubiquitination of additional proteins including non-phosphorylated forms of α-syn.
Discussion
In this report, we demonstrate a role for the USP19 deubiquitinase in mediating the progression of Parkinson’s disease pathology in a mouse model. Using a murine model expressing the disease associated α-syn A53T mutation, we demonstrated that loss of USP19 clearly decreases the burden of pSyn-positive aggregates in the brains injected with α-syn PFF. Other deubiquitinating enzymes such as USP30 and USP35 have been implicated in Parkinson’s disease through their roles in regulating mitophagy59–61. In addition, USP8 targets α-syn K63-linked polyubiquitin chains and is upregulated in human neurons with LB pathology. Interestingly, knocking down USP8 results in accelerated lysosomal degradation of α-syn and an improved rough-eye phenotype and locomotor function in a Drosophila model of α-syn induced toxicity62. On the contrary, USP9X is downregulated in SNc of PD patients and its deubiquitination of monoubiquitinated α-syn promotes proteasomal degradation63. These studies provide evidence of deubiquitinase’s differential regulation of α-syn stability. Here we demonstrate a role for a deubiquitinating enzyme in modulating specifically the accumulation of pSyn-containing aggregates which are the hallmark of PD. The improved pathology in the USP19 KO brains was evident in many regions and included substantia nigra pars compacta, striatum, hypothalamus, thalamus, and cortex. These areas are all part of the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop which controls sensorimotor function among others and its hypofunction is directly implicated in PD. Consistent with this, we observed a significantly better performance in the tail-suspension test in the KO mice. In addition to the decrease in insoluble pSyn aggregates, we also observed a marked decrease in pTau-positive insoluble aggregates. This is in line with studies showing that α-syn promotes tau seeding and spreading in the context of PD and AD27.
We demonstrated here that USP19 was expressed in multiple cell types in the brain – neurons, astrocytes and microglia. The exact cell type(s) in which USP19 acts to support the accumulation of aggregates is unclear. However, we were able to demonstrate in primary neuronal cultures that loss of USP19 also decreases the accumulation of pSyn aggregates upon exposure to preformed fibrils indicating that USP19’s actions in neurons is at least partly responsible. Microglial activation in response to injected PFFs was also diminished significantly in USP19 KO brains (Fig. 3). This was revealed not only by decreased expression of markers such as Iba1 and GFAP, but also by the presence of phenotypically less activated microglia. Since neuroinflammation has been implicated in the progression of PD (reviewed in64), it is possible that loss of USP19’s actions in these cells may also play a role in the neuroprotection seen in the KO mice. However, previous work in peripheral mononuclear cells has shown that loss of USP19 results in a hyperinflammatory response27. Thus, it is more likely that the decreased microglial activation in the KO brains was due to the decreased pathology causing less neuroinflammation.
USP19 KO decreased accumulation of pSyn aggregates moderately, but reproducibly, and this was evident in the hemisphere injected with PFF and also in the contralateral hemisphere. This did not appear to be due to decreased uptake of the injected PFF as the number of cells affected by pSyn pathology in their cell bodies at an earlier timepoint when pSyn aggregates become detectable was similar in both WT and KO (Fig. 2d). In support of this, the rate of uptake of α-syn PFF was similar in WT and KO primary neuronal cells (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5a, b). Previous work on USP19 (ER isoform) indicated that it plays an important role in an unconventional pathway of protein secretion (MAPS) that appears specific for misfolded proteins including α-syn and tau31. We have measured levels of α-syn in the blood of these mice but did not detect any differences between WT and KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 8d). Supporting a lack of effect on secretion, we did not find any differences in the rate of propagation of pathogenic α-syn species between WT and KO cells using microfluidic chips that separate treated and nontreated neurons which connect solely by extending axons (Supplementary Fig. 6). We have attempted to measure the rate of secretion of α-syn from primary neurons derived from the WT M83 and USP19 KO M83 embryos and exposed to PFF using ELISA, immunoblot and slot blot approaches. However, these measurements have been technically difficult due to the primary neurons not tolerating well the change of media required for such studies. The variable measurements obtained may have been due to variabilities in spontaneous release by cell death, residual carry over of PFFs, or in uptake activity following the change of media. The injection of PFF also induced the accumulation of pTau aggregates and like the pSyn aggregates, their levels were decreased in the KO brains (Fig. 2h, i). Although the MAPS pathway can secrete not only α-syn but also tau and TDP-4333, it may not be the central mechanism regulating the levels of pSyn in our model.
In the absence of any effects of loss of USP19 on α-syn uptake or propagation, we conclude that USP19 regulates the intracellular economy of α-syn. In support of this, WT and KO mice examined at 60 days post-injection of PFF had similar numbers of pSyn-positive cells in multiple regions of the brain, but total pSyn pathology (area of pSyn) was reduced in the KO indicating a decrease in the amount of aggregates per neuron (Fig. 2d, e). A similar decrease in pSyn aggregates was seen by IF in KO primary neuronal cultures chronically exposed to PFF (Fig. 5a, b). This was coupled with an accumulation of soluble higher molecular weight species of pSyn (Fig. 5d, e) detected by immunoblotting, representing PTM modifications and/or oligomers of pSyn. Importantly, we found that pSyn+ aggregates were more ubiquitinated in the brains of USP19 KO animals (Fig. 6a, b). Immunoprecipitation experiments of soluble fractions of whole-brain lysates and primary neuron cell lysates confirmed that USP19 KO have higher levels of ubiquitinated pSyn (Fig. 6d, e; Fig. S7). These results provide evidence for USP19 regulation of ubiquitination of pSyn in both aggregates and soluble species. The cellular consequences of this altered ubiquitination are unclear at this time, but our results suggest at least two possible mechanisms (Fig. 7). Increased ubiquitination of the soluble species may impair formation of aggregates as has been observed in vitro65,66 and increased ubiquitination of aggregates in the KO brain may result in lower levels of aggregates due to more efficient clearance in the KO. The lysosomal system is generally believed to play an important role in α-syn degradation67–69 and ubiquitination can target proteins to this system as well as to the proteasome. It is also possible that the increased ubiquitination promotes fragmentation or disassembly of aggregates into soluble oligomeric species. USP19 can interact with Hsp70 and this chaperone has been implicated in the disassembly of α-synuclein fibrils70–72. To date we have not been able to detect a direct interaction between USP19 and α-syn species, but these assays may be limited by the relatively low expression of USP19 protein and the limited sensitivity of available antibodies. Therefore, we cannot exclude at this time the possibility that USP19 lowers ubiquitination of synuclein through an indirect effect.
Interestingly, we observed worse pSyn pathology in USP19 WT females compared to males (Supplementary Fig. 2g, h). To our knowledge, this sex specific difference has not been previously reported in this commonly used model of PD and may reflect the fact that we used a large number of animals with both sexes in our study. The male to female prevalence of PD is about 3:2, although sex specific differences in severity of Lewy body pathology in humans have not been reported. Interestingly, male PD patients present with more rigidity, difficulties with vocal pitch, writing and gait and have higher prevalence of REM sleep disorder. On the other hand, females display more postural instability, freezing, are more likely to be depressed, and need higher levodopa dose (reviewed in73). The sex differences in pSyn pathology in our mice were not uniformly present in all brain regions. Such differences occurring in a regional manner could explain the sex-based differences in symptomatology described above. USP19 expression has been shown to be higher in female muscle due to the presence of an estrogen receptor α response element in the first intron of the USP19 gene43. Expression of this receptor has been reported to be 1.6x higher in female than male adult mouse brain74. Whether these findings can explain the sex specific differences we observed remains to be explored. Nonetheless, these observations reinforce the importance of conducting studies in adequate numbers of both sexes.
Although a clear decrease in pSyn pathology was evident in the KO brains, we did not observe an improvement in survival in the KO animals. One possible explanation for this phenotype might be unrelated to the Lewy body pathology. USP19 whole body KO animals have decreased body weight (~20% reduced in females, ~10% in males75), mainly due to an ~60% reduction in the adipose tissue (ref.76 and Supplementary Fig. 3b). Thus, the reduced adipose tissue reserves in these global USP19 KO mice may have made them more prone to early death during PD-like disease progression. Future studies are needed to mitigate this confounding phenotype by knocking-out USP19 specifically in the CNS or even in specific subsets of neuronal or glial cells. The combination of PFF injection with endogenous production of mutant α-syn yielded a model in which disease progression was more rapid than what typically occurs in humans and so may also have obscured a survival benefit of loss of USP19. A clearer insight into this question is important in view of USP19 being a candidate gene for PD39 and as USP19 inhibitors have recently been described77 and might be a therapeutic approach for slowing the progression of PD or other misfolded protein associated neurodegenerative diseases.
Methods
List of antibodies and oligonucleotides used can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Methods for behavioral analyses in supplementary figures can be found in Supplementary methods.
Animals
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. Animals were housed in high efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered cages with a 12-hour light/dark cycle at 21 °C with environmental enrichment and access to food (32% protein, 14% fat, and 54% carbohydrates) and water ad libitum. The mice were generally housed in groups (maximum n = 5 per cage), but males were frequently isolated due to aggressive behavior. M83 hemizygous (M83hem) mice expressing human alpha-synuclein with the A53T mutation under the control of a prion promoter (Pmp-SNCA*A53T;40) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. M83+/+ mice were mated with Usp19−/−/C57BL/6 mice (generated in our laboratory as previously described in75) for two generations to obtain M83+/+/USP19+/−. As M83hem mice were used in this study, M83+/+/USP19+/− mice were bred with USP19+/− negative for M83 transgene to finally generate USP19+/+/M83hem (USP19 WT/M83hem) and USP19−/−/M83hem (USP19 KO/M83hem). All available animals (females and males) were used for each experiment; thus, groups were assigned based on genotype unless stated otherwise. Animals were genotyped using PCR-based amplification of M83 transgene and geo cassette present in USP19 deletion allele75.
PFF preparation
Human α-syn PFF were prepared as previously described54. It was expressed in E. coli followed by endotoxin removal after purification. Monomeric α-syn (5 mg/ml) was allowed to spontaneously form fibrillar aggregates at 37 °C in an orbital shaker for 5 days at 1000 RPM. Quality control was assessed per batch using transmission electron microscopy to examine fibrillar morphology after negative staining, and Thioflavin-T assay to verify formation of amyloid fibrils, which were then sonicated by 40 cycles of 30 s ON-OFF on a Bioruptor Pico (Denville, NJ) to yield fibrils of 50–100 nm long in hydrodynamic diameter as shown by dynamic light scattering29,78. Sonicated fibrils were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C for short periods of time. An aliquot of PFFs was thawed at room temperature immediately prior to injection or culture treatment.
Stereotaxic injection
Unilateral stereotaxic injection to deliver PFF or PBS into the right dorsal striatum was performed as previously described41. Briefly, at 3-month-old, mice were positioned in the stereotaxic frame. A hole was drilled through the skull and injection performed at the following coordinates relative to bregma: A/P(y) = +0.2 mm, M/L(x) = +2.0 mm and D/V(z) = −2.6 mm. Automatic injection (syringe: 5 μl, 75 RN, 700 Series, Hamilton) was performed to administer the PFF (2.5 μl of 5 mg/ml) at a rate 0.25 μl/min. The wound was sutured, and animals were monitored closely until full recovery. Unless otherwise indicated, mice were sacrificed at 3-month post-injection.
Histology
Mice were anesthetized and transcardially perfused with ice-cold PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) buffered in PBS. Brains were removed and post-fixed with 4% PFA in PBS at 4 °C O/N. Brains were coronally pre-sectioned into 6 equally thick rostro-caudal parts, processed (dehydration and wax infiltration) and paraffin embedded. Six-micron sections were prepared with microtome (Leica), mounted onto microscopic slides, dried at 37 °C and stored at RT until use.
Immunohistochemistry
Brain tissue on glass slides was deparaffinized and re-hydrated as follows: 3 × 5 min CitriSolv, 2 × 5 min 100% ethanol, 2 × 5 min 95% ethanol, 1 × 5 min 70% ethanol and 2 × 1 min deionized water. For antigen retrieval, slides were submerged in sodium citrate buffer (10 mM, pH = 6) and boiled for 10 min. After cooling to RT, the slides were washed with 1× Tris-buffered-saline-TritonX10 (TBST, pH = 7.6). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched for 15 min in 3% H2O2 in H2O followed by 2× TBST washes. Sections were blocked in 5% goat serum in TBST for 1 h at RT and incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber with primary antibodies. After 3 × 5 min TBST washes, sections were incubated for 1 h at RT with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies followed by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) incubation. Chromogen development was closely monitored, and reaction stopped in water. Hematoxylin was used as a counterstain; sections were then sequentially dehydrated using ethanol solution gradient (70%, 95%, and 100%) and mounted using organic mounting media (Permount, Fisher Scientific). Whole-slide images were acquired using the Leica Aperio AT Turbo digital pathology scanner (objective: 20×/0.75 Plan Apo). Image analysis was performed using QuPath digital pathology software79.
Immunofluorescence
Brain tissue was processed as described above up until primary antibody incubation. Previously validated primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence followed by secondary fluorophore-conjugated antibodies. DAPI was used to stain nuclei. Dehydration step was omitted, and sections were mounted using aqueous mounting media. Whole section images were acquired using the Zeiss AxioScan Z1 slide scanning system (10× objective). Image analysis was performed in QuPath digital pathology software79 with built-in ImageJ extension and home-made macros.
Primary neurons on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde supplemented with 30% sucrose in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were blocked and permeabilized by 5% goat serum + 1% bovine serum albumin + 0.5% saponin (Sigma: 47036) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibody was incubated overnight at 4 °C followed by secondary antibody incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Antibodies were diluted in PBS with 5% goat serum + 1% bovine serum albumin + 0.1% saponin. Where proximity ligation assays (PLA) were carried out, this was done after the above staining for other antibodies. Cells were blocked with Duolink® Blocking Solution for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by incubation overnight at 4oC with PLA probes coupled to anti-α-synuclein antibody (Abcam, 4D6). PLA probes were diluted in Duolink® Antibody Diluent for 1:750. PLA fluorescent signals was generated by Duolink® In Situ Detection Reagents Far Red (Sigma) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then stained with DAPI before mounting the slides with ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mount. PLA image analysis was processed by 3D suite (10.1093/bioinformatics/btt276) in ImageJ. Briefly, PLA puncta was detected by 3D Maxima Finder, and the PLA volume was segmented by 3D watershed based on the detected seeds. Neuronal dendrite marker, MAP2, was used to quantify PLA signals overlapped with neuronal projections. The image acquisition and thresholding parameters remained consistent throughout all experiments. Normalization was done based on the mean of the PLA at day 4 in the corresponding experiment.
RNA in-situ hybridization
RNA in-situ hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol RNAscope® Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 Assay. Briefly, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain sections were deparaffinized by sequential incubation in CitriSolv (3 × 5 min) and 100% ethanol (2× min). Slides were dried for 5 min at 60 °C. Sections were incubated in RNAscope Hydrogen Peroxide for 10 min at room temperature. Target retrieval was performed in a target retrieval buffer using a steamer at 99 °C for 15 min. Sections were rinsed in distilled water and cooled down to room temperature, then incubated in 100% ethanol and dried. RNAscope® Protease Plus buffer was applied and slides incubated for 15 min in RNAscope humidified oven at 40 °C then rinsed with water. Specific probes [USP19-ER (ACD #847951-C2), USP19-cyt (ACD #847961-C3) or USP19 common (ACD#847941)] were then hybridized for 2 h at 40 °C, then washed 2 × 2 min in a wash buffer. Sequential hybridization of amplification probes was performed. Hybridization of HRP probes was performed thereafter. Finally, hybridization of detection probes was performed using fluorescent Opal dies. Immunofluorescence for neuronal and glial markers was performed thereafter.
Behavioral phenotyping
For all behavioral evaluation, the experimenter was blinded to treatment and genotype groups.
Survival
PFF- and PBS-injected mice were subjected to a survival study to assess differences in overt pathology between USP19 WT and KO/M83hem animals. Post-surgery, mice were closely monitored (twice a week) for the presence of PD-like symptoms (decreased movement, tremors, and unbalanced gait) and drop in body weight. Closer to the 3-month post-PFF timepoint, mice were monitored daily. If mice exerted overt deficits or lost >20% of initial body weight due to inability to feed and drink, they were considered to have reached the clinical endpoint and were euthanized. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier survival curve.
Tail-suspension test
Tail-suspension test (TST) was performed to assess behavioral changes reminiscent of PD pathology. A mouse was securely fastened with a medical tape by its tail and hung head-down in obstacle-free air. Mobility was recorded using ANYmaze (Stoelting Co.) automatic movement tracking software during a single 5-min test period.
Protein biochemistry
Sequential solubilization of total brain protein
Ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres (or right and left in noninjected controls) were processed using previously established protocols80–82 with the following adjustments. Tissue was homogenized at 20,000 RPM (Polytron) in 10 volumes (w/v) of 1× TBS (Tris-buffered saline) buffer (containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail) (Sigma, USA) and PR-619 (Life Sensors, USA), a broad deubiquitinase inhibitor at 4 °C. Homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 × g to remove cell debris. Supernatant (crude homogenate) was placed in a polycarbonate centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. Resulting supernatant was retained as TBS-soluble fraction. Pellet was resuspended by sonication (10 s, 20 kHz, 40% sonicator) in 5 volumes of 1× TBS buffer containing 5% SDS at RT. Second round of ultracentrifugation was performed at 100,000 × g for 30 min at RT. Supernatant was retained as SDS-soluble fraction. Finally, the pellet was solubilized in about 50–100 μl of 1× TBS buffer containing 5% SDS and 8 M urea by water-bath sonication for 10 min to attain complete protein solubilization. Resulting fraction is termed the Urea-soluble fraction.
Western Blotting
Brain samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE using gradient gels (5–20%). Transfer was performed in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol for 2 h at a constant current of 350–400 mA at 4 °C. When different forms of α-syn were detected, membranes were washed for 5 min with PBS and incubated in a fixing buffer (4% PFA, 0.01% glutaraldehyde in PBS) for 30 min. After incubation, membrane was washed 3 × 5 min in 1× TBST buffer and blocked with 5% skimmed milk in 1× TBST for 30 min–1 h (if phosphorylated forms of proteins were detected, 50 mM NaF was added to blocking buffer). Each blot is derived from the same experiment and if more than one blot was involved, they were processed in parallel.
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitation of pSyn under denaturing conditions was carried out by adding SDS and DTT (final concentrations 2% and 5 mM respectively) to 600 μg of the TBS-soluble fraction of the brain lysates followed by incubation at 95 °C for 10 min. The samples were then diluted 20× in TBS supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, proteasome inhibitor MG132 and deubiquitination inhibitor PR-619 to bring the SDS concentration to 0.1% and DTT to 0.25 mM. The samples were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and the supernatants incubated with 4 μg of rabbit monoclonal anti-phophoSer129 α-synuclein (or the corresponding IgG as IP control) for 3 h at 4 °C and then overnight at 4 °C with 60 μl of protein G-Sepharose beads. Precipitates were washed three times with 1 ml lysis buffer and proteins were eluted by boiling the beads 5 min in βME-reducing sample buffer before SDS-PAGE. Proteins lysates from cultured neurons were sonicated at 4 °C for 10 s and clarified at 10,000 × g for 10 min. Then, proteins from supernatant were solubilized for 1 h at 4 °C under non-denaturing conditions by gentle rotation in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, proteasome inhibitor MG132 and deubiquitination inhibitor PR-619. 800 μg of proteins were incubated with 3 μg of mouse monoclonal anti-ubiquitin antibody (clone FK2) or 3 μg of rabbit monoclonal anti-phophoSer129 α-syn (or their corresponding IgGs as IP control) for 3 h at 4 °C and then overnight at 4 °C with 60 μl of protein G-sepharose beads. Precipitates were washed three times with 1 ml lysis buffer and proteins were eluted by boiling the beads 5 min in βME-reducing sample buffer before SDS-PAGE.
Primary mouse cortical cultures
Cortical neurons were prepared from embryos (E15-16) of pregnant M83+/+ USP19+/− females (mated with USP19+/− males negative for M83 transgene) as previously described83,84 with some modifications. Briefly, embryonic brains were kept in hibernation media (Hibernate-E, Invitrogen) supplemented with 2% NeuroCult™ SM1 (Cederlane) and 0.5 mM L-GlutaMAX (Gibco) for several hours at 4 °C. Single embryo genotyping was performed to identify USP19 WT and KO embryos. Cortices were then microdissected in ice-cold HBSS (Gibco, 14170-112) supplemented with 33 mM sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, and 0.5 mg/ml penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine (Gibco, 10378-16). Tissue was trypsinized and triturated using P1000 pipette in supplemented neurobasal medium (2% NeuroCult™ SM1 and 0.5 mM L-GlutaMAX). Cells (100,000 cells on 12 mm diameter coverslip or 500,000 cells on 35 mm culture plate or 6-well plate) were plated on poly-D-lysine-precoated surfaces in supplemented neurobasal media. Neurons were treated with PFF or PBS at 9–11 days in vitro (DiV) for the duration of 3, 7, and 10 days.
Immunofluorescence
Neurons treated with PBS or PFF for 3–10 days were fixed using 4% PFA, 5% sucrose in PBS for 1 h. To block free aldehyde groups, 50 mM NH4Cl in 1× PBS was applied for 10 min. Following several PBS washes, 20 min blocking (10% serum, 0.02% TritonX-100 in 1× PBS) was performed. Cells were then incubated O/N at 4 °C in primary antibodies in 1× PBS/5% serum/0.02% Triton-X100, then washed 3 × 5 min in 1× PBS at RT. Secondary antibodies were applied in 1× PBS/5% serum/0.02% Triton-X100 for 1 h at RT. Following 3 × 5 min PBS washes, coverslips were mounted on microscopic slides.
Microfluidics
Microfluidic chips (Omega, open top – eNuvio, Canada) were handled according to manufacturer recommendations. Briefly, chambers were coated with 0.1 mg/ml poly-D-lysine O/N. 70,000 cells were plated in each chamber. Fluidic separation of chamber #1 from #2 was maintained using hydrostatic pressure (higher media volume in chamber #2). PFF at 2 μg/ml were used in the cell-to-cell propagation experiment. Immunofluorescence to label pSyn and MAP2 (dendritic marker) was performed following 10-day post-PFF treatment as described above. Microfluidic chips were imaged using Zeiss LSM780 confocal system with 10X objective, z-stacking and tile configuration.
Live-cell and fixed-cell imaging of PFF uptake
WT and KO neurons (16–18 DiV) were transduced with AAV to express GFP (3–4 days expression). Live-cell imaging was performed using 22 mm coverslips in a steel cell chamber (Attofluor™, Thermo Fisher). Neurons were kept on a heated stage (37 °C) on a Zeiss LSM780 inverted microscope. GFP and 568 fluorescence were excited through a x63 oil-immersion lens (NA, 1.4) using a 488-nm (1%) and 543-nm (3%) laser light, respectively. Time series (acquisition every 2 min) were collected for 1 h as multiple image slice using the Zen software. In the fixed-cell experiment, mature spiny neurons (18–21 DiV) were treated with 568-PFF (1 μg/ml) for 1–24 h, and IF was performed as described above. Multiple slice images (0.5 μm range) were acquired on the Zeiss LSM880 microscope using x63 oil-immersion lens (NS, 1.4). The amount of internalized PFF was measured as mean fluorescence intensity in the cell body cytoplasm (avoiding membrane-attached PFF signal) using the ImageJ software.
Image analysis
Histological images stained for pSyn were quantified using QuPath software and built-in Positive cell detection analysis. Brain regions were annotated, and number of total (hematoxylin) and positive cells (DAB) calculated using custom parameters. Each sample was then inspected for the presence of false detections (due to tissue, staining or imaging artifacts) which were then removed from analysis. Sections of similar Bregma positions were used for pSyn pathology comparison between groups. Four sections per animal were used for image analysis. The experimenter was blinded to the treatment and genotype.
Availability of unique biological materials
The USP19 mutant mice used in this study have been deposited with the Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center (www.mmrrc.org; item number MMRRC:067048-UCD).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the United States Dept of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs of grant #PD170110 and by a Parkinson Canada Pilot Project Grant awarded to S.S.W., T.D., and Y.Y. and Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant # FRN 168937 and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant # RGPIN-2016-04054 to S.S.W. Y.Y. is supported by an intramural research program of NIDDK in the National Institutes of Health. L.S. and J.B.P. were recipients of fellowship awards from the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre. H.H. was the recipient of a studentship award from the McGill Healthy Brains, Healthy Lives Canada First Research Excellence Fund and J.H. was the recipient of a Canada Graduates Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Author contributions
L.S. performed all histology, immunostaining, primary culture, and imaging experiments. L.S., N.B., J.B.P., and Y.W. performed behavioral tests. L.S. and M.P. performed image analysis. L.S., N.B., and A.K. performed biochemical experiments. L.S. and H.H. prepared primary neuronal cultures and H.H. conducted P.L.A. assays. L.S. and J.H. performed cell viability assay. W.L. prepared and E.C. and I.S. validated the P.F.F. preparations. M.P. participated with animal breeding and colony maintenance. M.J.C.M., Z.Y., D.C.V., M.L., and A.K. participated in methods development. L.S., S.W., T.D., and Y.Y. contributed to hypothesis development, experimental design, and data interpretation. SW provided overall supervision. S.W., T.D., and Y.Y. provided funding. All authors discussed the data and commented on the manuscript.
Data availability
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information file.
Competing interests
S.S.W. has performed contract research for Almac Discovery for studies not involving the results presented here. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Thomas M. Durcan, Email: thomas.durcan@mcgill.ca
Simon S. Wing, Email: simon.wing@mcgill.ca
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41531-023-00601-1.
References
- 1.Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112:389–404. doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Braak H, et al. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2003;24:197–211. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Burre J, et al. Alpha-synuclein promotes SNARE-complex assembly in vivo and in vitro. Science. 2010;329:1663–1667. doi: 10.1126/science.1195227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burre J, et al. Properties of native brain alpha-synuclein. Nature. 2013;498:E4–E6. doi: 10.1038/nature12125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burmann BM, et al. Regulation of alpha-synuclein by chaperones in mammalian cells. Nature. 2020;577:127–132. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1808-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Samuel F, et al. Effects of Serine 129 phosphorylation on alpha-synuclein aggregation, membrane association, and internalization. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:4374–4385. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.705095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Flagmeier P, et al. Mutations associated with familial Parkinson’s disease alter the initiation and amplification steps of alpha-synuclein aggregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:10328–10333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604645113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kruger R, et al. Ala30Pro mutation in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Genet. 1998;18:106–108. doi: 10.1038/ng0298-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zarranz JJ, et al. The new mutation, E46K, of alpha-synuclein causes Parkinson and Lewy body dementia. Ann. Neurol. 2004;55:164–173. doi: 10.1002/ana.10795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Polymeropoulos MH, et al. Mutation in the alpha-synuclein gene identified in families with Parkinson’s disease. Science. 1997;276:2045–2047. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5321.2045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pasanen P, et al. Novel alpha-synuclein mutation A53E associated with atypical multiple system atrophy and Parkinson’s disease-type pathology. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:2180 e2181–2180.e2185. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Appel-Cresswell S, et al. Alpha-synuclein p.H50Q, a novel pathogenic mutation for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2013;28:811–813. doi: 10.1002/mds.25421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lesage S, et al. G51D alpha-synuclein mutation causes a novel Parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 2013;73:459–471. doi: 10.1002/ana.23894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chartier-Harlin MC, et al. Alpha-synuclein locus duplication as a cause of familial Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2004;364:1167–1169. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17103-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Singleton AB, et al. Alpha-synuclein locus triplication causes Parkinson’s disease. Science. 2003;302:841. doi: 10.1126/science.1090278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kordower JH, Chu Y, Hauser RA, Freeman TB, Olanow CW. Lewy body-like pathology in long-term embryonic nigral transplants in Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Med. 2008;14:504–506. doi: 10.1038/nm1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li JY, et al. Lewy bodies in grafted neurons in subjects with Parkinson’s disease suggest host-to-graft disease propagation. Nat. Med. 2008;14:501–503. doi: 10.1038/nm1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Desplats P, et al. Inclusion formation and neuronal cell death through neuron-to-neuron transmission of alpha-synuclein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:13010–13015. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903691106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hansen C, et al. Alpha-synuclein propagates from mouse brain to grafted dopaminergic neurons and seeds aggregation in cultured human cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:715–725. doi: 10.1172/JCI43366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Angot E, et al. Alpha-synuclein cell-to-cell transfer and seeding in grafted dopaminergic neurons in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aulic S, et al. Defined alpha-synuclein prion-like molecular assemblies spreading in cell culture. BMC Neurosci. 2014;15:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Peelaerts W, et al. Alpha-synuclein strains cause distinct synucleinopathies after local and systemic administration. Nature. 2015;522:340–344. doi: 10.1038/nature14547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tarutani A, et al. The effect of fragmented pathogenic alpha-synuclein seeds on prion-like propagation. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:18675–18688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.734707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Masaracchia C, et al. Membrane binding, internalization, and sorting of alpha-synuclein in the cell. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018;6:79. doi: 10.1186/s40478-018-0578-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Holmes BB, et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate internalization and propagation of specific proteopathic seeds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E3138–E3147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301440110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ihse E, et al. Cellular internalization of alpha-synuclein aggregates by cell surface heparan sulfate depends on aggregate conformation and cell type. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08720-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bassil, F. et al. Alpha-synuclein modulates tau spreading in mouse brains. J. Exp. Med.10.1084/jem.20192193 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Birol M, Wojcik SP, Miranker AD, Rhoades E. Identification of N-linked glycans as specific mediators of neuronal uptake of acetylated alpha-Synuclein. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bayati A, et al. Rapid macropinocytic transfer of alpha-synuclein to lysosomes. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111102. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fussi N, et al. Exosomal secretion of alpha-synuclein as protective mechanism after upstream blockage of macroautophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:757. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0816-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lee JG, Takahama S, Zhang G, Tomarev SI, Ye Y. Unconventional secretion of misfolded proteins promotes adaptation to proteasome dysfunction in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18:765–776. doi: 10.1038/ncb3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu Y, et al. DNAJC5 facilitates USP19-dependent unconventional secretion of misfolded cytosolic proteins. Cell Discov. 2018;4:11. doi: 10.1038/s41421-018-0012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fontaine SN, et al. DnaJ/Hsc70 chaperone complexes control the extracellular release of neurodegenerative-associated proteins. EMBO J. 2016;35:1537–1549. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee J, et al. Abnormal triaging of misfolded proteins by adult neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-associated DNAJC5/CSPalpha mutants causes lipofuscin accumulation. Autophagy. 2022;19:1–20. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2022.2065618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jin S, et al. USP19 modulates autophagy and antiviral immune responses by deubiquitinating Beclin-1. EMBO J. 2016;35:866–880. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhao X, et al. USP19 (ubiquitin specific peptidase 19) promotes TBK1 (TANK-binding kinase 1) degradation via chaperone-mediated autophagy. Autophagy. 2021;25:1–18. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1963155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee JG, Kim W, Gygi S, Ye Y. Characterization of the deubiquitinating activity of USP19 and its role in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:3510–3517. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.538934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell. 2009;138:389–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nalls MA, et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:1091–1102. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30320-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Giasson BI, et al. Neuronal alpha-synucleinopathy with severe movement disorder in mice expressing A53T human alpha-synuclein. Neuron. 2002;34:521–533. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00682-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Luk KC, et al. Intracerebral inoculation of pathological alpha-synuclein initiates a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative alpha-synucleinopathy in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:975–986. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Luk KC, et al. Pathological alpha-synuclein transmission initiates Parkinson-like neurodegeneration in nontransgenic mice. Science. 2012;338:949–953. doi: 10.1126/science.1227157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ogawa M, et al. 17beta-estradiol represses myogenic differentiation by increasing ubiquitin-specific peptidase 19 through estrogen receptor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:41455–41465. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.276824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Badiola N, et al. Tau enhances alpha-synuclein aggregation and toxicity in cellular models of synucleinopathy. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dasari AKR, Kayed R, Wi S, Lim KH. Tau interacts with the C-terminal region of alpha-synuclein, promoting formation of toxic aggregates with distinct molecular conformations. Biochemistry. 2019;58:2814–2821. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Waxman EA, Giasson BI. Induction of intracellular tau aggregation is promoted by alpha-synuclein seeds and provides novel insights into the hyperphosphorylation of tau. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:7604–7618. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0297-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Moussaud S, et al. Alpha-synuclein and tau: teammates in neurodegeneration? Mol. Neurodegener. 2014;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-9-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pan L, et al. Tau accelerates alpha-synuclein aggregation and spreading in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2022;145:3454–3471. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Giasson BI, et al. Initiation and synergistic fibrillization of tau and alpha-synuclein. Science. 2003;300:636–640. doi: 10.1126/science.1082324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dickson DW. Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism: neuropathology. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012;2:a009258. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tanriover G, et al. Prominent microglial inclusions in transgenic mouse models of alpha-synucleinopathy that are distinct from neuronal lesions. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020;8:133. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-00993-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yun SP, et al. Block of A1 astrocyte conversion by microglia is neuroprotective in models of Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Med. 2018;24:931–938. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0051-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Castro-Sanchez S, et al. Cx3cr1-deficiency exacerbates alpha-synuclein-A53T induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Glia. 2018;66:1752–1762. doi: 10.1002/glia.23338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Duffy MF, et al. Lewy body-like alpha-synuclein inclusions trigger reactive microgliosis prior to nigral degeneration. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018;15:129. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1171-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ho MS. Microglia in Parkinson’s disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1175:335–353. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9913-8_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Earls RH, et al. Intrastriatal injection of preformed alpha-synuclein fibrils alters central and peripheral immune cell profiles in non-transgenic mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019;16:250. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1636-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Paumier KL, et al. Behavioral characterization of A53T mice reveals early and late stage deficits related to Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e70274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Roberts RF, Wade-Martins R, Alegre-Abarrategui J. Direct visualization of alpha-synuclein oligomers reveals previously undetected pathology in Parkinson’s disease brain. Brain. 2015;138:1642–1657. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bingol B, et al. The mitochondrial deubiquitinase USP30 opposes parkin-mediated mitophagy. Nature. 2014;510:370–375. doi: 10.1038/nature13418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tsefou E, et al. Investigation of USP30 inhibition to enhance Parkin-mediated mitophagy: tools and approaches. Biochem J. 2021;478:4099–4118. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liang JR, et al. USP30 deubiquitylates mitochondrial Parkin substrates and restricts apoptotic cell death. EMBO Rep. 2015;16:618–627. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Alexopoulou Z, et al. Deubiquitinase Usp8 regulates alpha-synuclein clearance and modifies its toxicity in Lewy body disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E4688–E4697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523597113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rott R, et al. Alpha-synuclein fate is determined by USP9X-regulated monoubiquitination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:18666–18671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105725108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tansey MG, et al. Inflammation and immune dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022;22:657–673. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00684-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Meier F, et al. Semisynthetic, site-specific ubiquitin modification of alpha-synuclein reveals differential effects on aggregation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:5468–5471. doi: 10.1021/ja300094r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Haj-Yahya M, et al. Synthetic polyubiquitinated alpha-synuclein reveals important insights into the roles of the ubiquitin chain in regulating its pathophysiology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17726–17731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315654110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lee HJ, Khoshaghideh F, Patel S, Lee SJ. Clearance of alpha-synuclein oligomeric intermediates via the lysosomal degradation pathway. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:1888–1896. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3809-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cuervo AM, Stefanis L, Fredenburg R, Lansbury PT, Sulzer D. Impaired degradation of mutant alpha-synuclein by chaperone-mediated autophagy. Science. 2004;305:1292–1295. doi: 10.1126/science.1101738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mak SK, McCormack AL, Manning-Bog AB, Cuervo AM, Di Monte DA. Lysosomal degradation of alpha-synuclein in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:13621–13629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.074617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gao X, et al. Human Hsp70 disaggregase reverses Parkinson’s-linked alpha-synuclein amyloid fibrils. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:781–793. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schneider MM, et al. The Hsc70 disaggregation machinery removes monomer units directly from alpha-synuclein fibril ends. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5999. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25966-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Liu T, et al. USP19 suppresses inflammation and promotes M2-like macrophage polarization by manipulating NLRP3 function via autophagy. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:2431–2442. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00567-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Miller IN, Cronin-Golomb A. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease: clinical characteristics and cognition. Mov. Disord. 2010;25:2695–2703. doi: 10.1002/mds.23388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sharma PK, Thakur MK. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and beta in mouse cerebral cortex: effect of age, sex and gonadal steroids. Neurobiol. Aging. 2006;27:880–887. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bedard N, et al. Inactivation of the ubiquitin-specific protease 19 deubiquitinating enzyme protects against muscle wasting. FASEB J. 2015;29:3889–3898. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-270579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Coyne ES, et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP19 modulates adipogenesis and potentiates high-fat-diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance in mice. Diabetologia. 2019;62:136–146. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4754-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Jacq, X. et al. Abstract LB-087: Discovery and development of first-in-class orally bioavailable USP19 inhibitors [abstract]. Cancer Res.10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-LB-087 (2019).
- 78.Lackie RE, et al. Stress-inducible phosphoprotein 1 (HOP/STI1/STIP1) regulates the accumulation and toxicity of alpha-synuclein in vivo. Acta Neuropathol. 2022;144:881–910. doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02491-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bankhead P, et al. QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:16878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bandopadhyay R. Sequential extraction of soluble and insoluble alpha-synuclein from Parkinsonian brains. J. Vis. Exp. 2016;5:53415. doi: 10.3791/53415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kuan WL, et al. Systemic alpha-synuclein injection triggers selective neuronal pathology as seen in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021;26:556–567. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0608-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sasaki A, Arawaka S, Sato H, Kato T. Sensitive western blotting for detection of endogenous Ser129-phosphorylated alpha-synuclein in intracellular and extracellular spaces. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14211. doi: 10.1038/srep14211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Khayachi A, et al. Sumoylation regulates FMRP-mediated dendritic spine elimination and maturation. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:757. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03222-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Khayachi A, et al. Chronic lithium treatment alters the excitatory/ inhibitory balance of synaptic networks and reduces mGluR5-PKC signalling in mouse cortical neurons. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2021;46:E402–E414. doi: 10.1503/jpn.200185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information file.