Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2023 Oct 27;89(11):e01205-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.01205-23

Tetracycline resistance in Listeria monocytogenes and L. innocua from wild black bears (Ursus americanus) in the United States is mediated by novel transposable elements

Phillip Brown 1,✉,#, Kevin Hernandez 2,#, Cameron Parsons 2,#, Yi Chen 3, Nicholas Gould 4, Christopher S DePerno 4, Jeffrey Niedermeyer 2, Sophia Kathariou 1,2,
Editor: Charles M Dozois5
PMCID: PMC10686073  PMID: 37888979

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular foodborne pathogen and the causative agent of the severe disease listeriosis. It is found ubiquitously in the environment and exhibits innate resistance to certain antimicrobials, but acquired antimicrobial resistance remains relatively uncommon. Given the potentially dire health outcomes associated with listeriosis, acquisition of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) by this pathogen is of considerable public health concern. AMR in L. monocytogenes has been surveyed frequently in strains of clinical and food origin, but much less commonly in wildlife. We analyzed 158 strains of L. monocytogenes and 27 of non-pathogenic Listeria spp. isolated from wild black bears (Ursus americanus) for resistance to a panel of antimicrobials. AMR was uncommon and noted mostly for tetracycline. Tetracycline resistance was more common in Listeria innocua than in L. monocytogenes. All tetracycline-resistant L. monocytogenes strains belonged to sequence type ST1039 and harbored the Tn916-like tet(M) transposon Tn916.1039 in a conserved chromosomal location. In contrast, three different tetracycline resistance elements, i.e., the tet(M) elements Tn5801.UAM and Tn5801.551 and the tet(S) element Tn6000.205, were identified among tetracycline-resistant strains of L. innocua. The greater prevalence and diversity of tetracycline resistance elements among bear-derived non-pathogenic Listeria strains suggest the potential of the latter to serve as reservoirs for retention and diversification of AMR determinants in this wildlife host and warrant their further monitoring and study.

IMPORTANCE

Listeria monocytogenes causes severe foodborne illness and is the only human pathogen in the genus Listeria. Previous surveys of AMR in Listeria focused on clinical sources and food or food processing environments, with AMR in strains from wildlife and other natural ecosystems remaining under-explored. We analyzed 185 sequenced strains from wild black bears (Ursus americanus) from the United States, including 158 and 27 L. monocytogenes and L. innocua, respectively. Tetracycline resistance was the most prevalent resistance trait. In L. monocytogenes, it was encountered exclusively in serotype 4b strains with the novel Tn916-like element Tn916.1039. In contrast, three distinct, novel tetracycline resistance elements (Tn5801.UAM, Tn5801.551, and Tn6000.205) were identified in L. innocua. Interestingly, Tn5801.551 was identical to elements in L. monocytogenes from a major foodborne outbreak in the United States in 2011. The findings suggest the importance of wildlife and non-pathogenic Listeria species as reservoir for resistance elements in Listeria.

KEYWORDS: Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria, foodborne pathogens, antibiotic resistance, tetracyclines, bear, genome analysis, environmental microbiology, transposons

INTRODUCTION

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that is ubiquitous in the environment and responsible for the severe, invasive disease listeriosis in humans and other animals. At high risk are pregnant women and their fetuses, the elderly, and patients who are immunocompromised. Symptoms include septicemia, meningitis, abortions, and stillbirths, and case fatality rates are high, even with appropriate antimicrobial treatment (1 5). L. monocytogenes represents the sole human pathogen in the genus Listeria which includes a number of other species, with novel species being increasingly recognized (6 11). L. monocytogenes has been isolated from a wide array of both domesticated and wild animals (12 15).

With a growing human population, greater wildlife habitat fragmentation, and an increasingly porous human-wildlife interface, human-wildlife interactions are also increasing and with them the potential for zoonotic disease transmission (16). While antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants are ubiquitous among environmental microorganisms, several studies have detected an increasing correlation of the prevalence of AMR genes with human activities and anthroponotic sources (17, 18).

AMR remains relatively uncommon in Listeria spp., except for intrinsic resistance to certain antimicrobials including fosfomycin, many modern cephalosporins, oxacillin, and nalidixic acid (19 24). Given the severity and high case fatality rate of listeriosis, and the critical role of antibiotics for treatment, typically a beta-lactam paired with an aminoglycoside (21, 22), continued surveillance of the emergence and dissemination of AMR in Listeria is clearly needed. While many previous studies have surveyed AMR in L. monocytogenes, the majority examined strains from human illness, food products, and food-processing environments (19, 20, 23 26). There is a notable scarcity of data on AMR in L. monocytogenes and other Listeria species from natural ecosystems, particularly those that may serve as reservoirs for AMR genes (19, 27).

Especially noteworthy is the scarcity of studies investigating AMR in L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. from wildlife. Complicating matters further, L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. are often uncommonly recovered from wildlife (12, 27 29). The overall trend from investigations with more than 10 wildlife samples has been that L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. were largely susceptible to the antimicrobials that were tested, with the exception of occasional resistance to clindamycin and common resistance to cefuroxime and oxacillin (12, 24, 24), to which Listeria tends to exhibit innate resistance (19, 20, 23, 30). However, recent studies have demonstrated the potential for wildlife to harbor multidrug-resistant Listeria strains (31, 32).

Our laboratory has conducted a 3-year study of L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. from wild black bears (Ursus americanus) in the United States, with most samples collected from bears in urban and suburban habitats in North Carolina (33). A significant portion (105 of 231, 45%) of the black bears yielded L. monocytogenes, either alone or together with other Listeria spp. (33). Here we employed phenotypic assessments of resistance to a panel of antimicrobials and whole-genome sequence data to analyze AMR in a subset of 158 of the L. monocytogenes strains from the black bears for which whole-genome sequence data have become recently available (34). Since AMR has the potential to be disseminated from non-pathogenic Listeria spp. to L. monocytogenes (35), we furthermore analyzed AMR and the underlying determinants in a panel of non-pathogenic strains of Listeria spp., mostly Listeria innocua, which were also derived from the black bears in the same study. The above-mentioned increasing incidence of human-wildlife encounters due to animal mobility and changing human demographics, together with the important public health implications of AMR for treatment of listeriosis, mandates better understanding of current trends and enhanced surveillance of AMR in Listeria from wildlife.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth media

The Listeria panel analyzed in this study consisted of strains collected between 2014 and 2017 from black bears in the United States with the majority of the strains being isolated from bears in urban and suburban North Carolina (33). The genome sequences of 158 strains of L. monocytogenes analyzed in this study have been recently reported (34). These strains were selected for whole-genome sequencing from a larger collection of 537 isolates and were chosen to be representative of different animals and sample types (i.e., feces and rectal and nasal swabs) (33, 34). Serotypes of L. monocytogenes were originally determined by multiplex PCR (33). Analysis of whole-genome sequence data was used for confirmation of serotype designations for L. monocytogenes and for in silico-based multilocus sequence typing (MLST) designations (34). The non-pathogenic panel included 25 strains selected based on their cadmium or tetracycline resistance from a larger cohort of 240 bear-derived isolates of Listeria spp. other than L. monocytogenes from North Carolina (33), and the previously described L. innocua UAM003-1A from a wild bear in California (32).

Listeria strains were routinely grown in tryptic soy broth supplemented with 0.7% yeast extract or in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA). Agar cultures employed tryptic soy broth with 1.2% agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, TSAYE) (33). Cultures were preserved at −80°C in BHI with 20% glycerol.

Antibiotic resistance determinations

Listeria strains were screened for resistance to a panel of antibiotics (Table 1) using previously published thresholds for resistance (24, 36). In addition, a subset of the strains was screened against cefotaxime (2 µg/mL), ceftriaxone (2 µg/mL), and linezolid (4 µg/mL) (37). The strains were grown in duplicate for 24 or 36 h at 37°C in 200µL BHI in individual wells of 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC, USA). The cultures from each well were then transferred using a flame-sterilized 48-prong stainless-steel device onto Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Becton, Dickinson and Co.) supplemented with the indicated levels of antimicrobials (Table 1), as well as onto antimicrobial-free MHA. Plates were examined following incubation for 48 h at 37°C. Resistance was indicated by confluent growth in both spots, and each strain was tested in at least two independent trials. L. monocytogenes strains F2365 (serotype 4b) and 2010L-1723 (serotype 1/2a) were previously known to be pan-sensitive and were included for quality assurance on all antimicrobial-supplemented plates. In addition, a panel of strains was included each time as positive controls for resistance to selected antimicrobials. These included L. monocytogenes strains 10403S and J2E3, previously known to be resistant to streptomycin and erythromycin, respectively (38, 39), as well as strain 2011L-2858, which was found in our laboratory to be resistant to tetracycline.

TABLE 1.

Resistance in L. monocytogenes from black bears to selected antimicrobials

Antibiotic (concentration) Resistance prevalence (%)
Ampicillin (1 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Trimethoprim (1 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Vancomycin (2 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Erythromycin (2 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Rifampicin (0.5 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Gentamicin (2 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Penicillin (1 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Tetracycline (5 µg/mL) 3.77 a
Chloramphenicol (10 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Kanamycin (10 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Streptomycin (20 µg/mL) <0.63 a
Cefotaxime (2 µg/mL) 100 b
Ceftriaxone (2 µg/mL) 100 b
Linezolid (4 µg/mL) <4.3 b
a

Based on the 158 strains of L. monocytogenes that were screened.

b

Based on 23 strains of L. monocytogenes that were screened.

A subset of strains was tested for ampicillin and tetracycline minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) using MIC strips [Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi (TE), Italy]. The strips were overlaid on BHI agar lawns of the strains as suggested by the vendor, and the MIC levels were determined visually following incubation at 37°C for 24 h. Strains were tested in at least two independent trials, and results were averaged.

Bioinformatics analysis

Core-genome and whole-genome multilocus sequencing typing (MLST) was performed in silico as described (34) using the MLST package (40), which incorporates components of the PubMLST database (https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/listeria/listeria.html) curated by the Pasteur Institute. Species determinations were based on average nucleotide identity analysis performed using the pyani software package (https://github.com/widdowquinn/pyani). Phylogenetic analysis using a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) matrix among L. innocua strains was performed using the CFSAN SNP Pipeline v.2.2.1 (41) utilizing the complete genome of L. innocua CLIP 11262 (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Accession, NC_003212.1) as the reference. A maximum likelihood tree was constructed using this SNP matrix with Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis X software (42) based on the Tamura-Nei model (43). Mobile genetic elements and their corresponding genomic localization sites were determined using the proteome comparison tool in the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (PATRIC) (44), confirmed using basic local alignment search tool (BLAST), and visualized using EasyFig (45). Isolates exhibiting antibiotic resistance were further analyzed via the NCBI pathogen detection pipeline (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/isolates/) and BIGSdb-Lm hosted by the Institut Pasteur (46). Nucleotide BLASTs were conducted with the NCBI BLAST using the nucleotide and whole-genome shotgun contig databases (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (47). Minimum spanning trees using the seven-locus MLST scheme were constructed with BioNumerics v.8.1 (https://www.applied-maths.com).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Antimicrobial resistance is generally uncommon in L. monocytogenes from black bears

The 158 L. monocytogenes strains were chosen for sequencing from a previously described larger panel of 537 L. monocytogenes from the black bears (33, 34) to minimize redundancy by avoiding multiple isolates of the same serotype from the same animal, location, and date. The genome sequences of these 158 strains were recently reported (34). As previously described (34), the most prevalent serotypes were 1/2a (lineage II, 51.6%) and 4b (lineage I, 37.1%), followed by much lower prevalence of serotypes 1/2c (lineage II, 3.8%) and 1/2b (lineage I, 2.5%). The few (n = 8) remaining strains belonged to lineage III or IV, and their serotype was not determined. The lineage and serotype distributions were representative of the larger panel (33). Of the 59 strains of serotype 4b, 35 (59.3%) had the atypical multiplex PCR profile designated IVb-v1, which was also commonly encountered in the larger panel from the black bears (33, 34).

None of the 158 L. monocytogenes strains were resistant to ampicillin, penicillin, trimethoprim, vancomycin, erythromycin, rifampicin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, or kanamycin. The only encountered resistance was to tetracycline, detected in six strains, i.e., a frequency of approx. 3.8% (Table 1). Previous studies identified frequent resistance of L. monocytogenes to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and linezolid (37). Screening of a subpanel of 23 L. monocytogenes strains representative of different serotypes revealed that all were resistant to both cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, suggesting frequent intrinsic resistance to these two antibiotics, in agreement with previous studies (20, 37). However, none demonstrated resistance to linezolid (Table 1).

The panel of non-pathogenic Listeria isolates characterized here was chosen to primarily consist of those previously determined to be resistant to tetracycline (n = 19) or heavy metals, specifically cadmium (n = 8) (Table 2). Only one strain, L. innocua SKB205, was concurrently resistant to tetracycline and cadmium (Table 2). Furthermore, L. innocua strain UAM003-1A was previously found to be resistant to tetracycline and one additional antimicrobial, i.e., streptomycin (32). Resistance to ampicillin, penicillin, trimethoprim, vancomycin, erythromycin, rifampicin, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, or kanamycin was not encountered. Of note, L. innocua UAM003-1A was earlier shown to harbor mphB and thus predicted to be resistant to macrolides, but was found susceptible to erythromycin (32). Furthermore, it harbored ant(6)-Ia_2 (aminoglycoside resistance) and, as noted above, was resistant to streptomycin but susceptible to the other tested aminoglycosides, i.e., gentamicin and kanamycin, as also reported previously (32).

TABLE 2.

Listeria monocytogenes and L. innocua strains investigated in this study

Strain a Species a Bear b Isolation date Location Sample c ST d AMR, Tn e MIC f
SKB111 L. monocytogenes N044 7/30/2014 NC, USA S 1039 tet(M) (Tn916.1039), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, mprF 32
SKB121 L. monocytogenes N021* 8/20/2014 NC, USA F 1039 tet(M) (Tn916.1039), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, mprF 48
SKB297 L. monocytogenes N085* 6/12/2015 NC, USA NS 1039 tet(M) (Tn916.1039), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, mprF 32
SKB461 L. monocytogenes N117 5/12/2016 NC, USA S 1039 tet(M) (Tn916.1039), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, mprF 32
SKB537 L. monocytogenes N126* 6/14/2016 NC, USA F 1039 tet(M) (Tn916.1039), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, mprF 28
SKB542 L. monocytogenes N130* 7/6/2016 NC, USA F 1039 tet(M) (Tn916.1039), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, mprF 48
SKB115 L. innocua N049* 8/12/2014 NC, USA F 1481 tet(M) (Tn5801.551), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB205# L. innocua N065 3/20/2015 NC, USA S 603 tet(S) (Tn6000.205), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 40
SKB363 L. innocua N095* 7/3/2015 NC, USA S 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 28
SKB388 L. innocua N0128 10/9/2015 VA, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 40
SKB410 L. innocua N108/109* 4/11/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB415 L. innocua N109 4/11/2016 NC, USA S 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB453 L. innocua N116* 5/12/2016 NC, USA S 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 20
SKB551 L. innocua N121* 7/12/2016 NC, USA NS 1481 tet(M) Tn5801.551, lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 28
SKB572 L. innocua N132* 7/15/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB626 L. innocua N061* 8/10/2016 NC, USA S 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 16
SKB635 L. innocua N061* 8/10/2016 NC, USA NS 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB638 L. innocua N138* 8/10/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 28
SKB650 L. innocua N140* 8/15/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB663 L. innocua N141* 8/15/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB673 L. innocua N141* 8/16/2016 NC, USA NS 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 28
SKB687 L. innocua N143 9/15/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 20
SKB713 L. innocua N092* 9/30/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
SKB716 L. innocua N138* 9/30/2016 NC, USA F 637 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F 24
UAM003-1A L. innocua UAM003 10/10/2017 CA, USA F 1495 tet(M) (Tn5801.UAM), lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F, ant (6)-Ia, mphB 20
SKB154# L. innocua N060 2/15/2015 NC, USA F 1086 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
SKB476# L. innocua N119 5/20/2016 NC, USA F 1480 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
SKB640 L. innocua N138* 8/10/2016 NC, USA F 1482 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
SKB651## L. innocua N140* 8/15/2016 NC, USA F 1482 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
SKB662## L. innocua N141* 8/15/2016 NC, USA F 1482 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
SKB674## L. innocua N141* 8/17/2016 NC, USA NS 1482 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
SKB766# L. innocua N158 5/23/2017 NC, USA F 1485 lin, fosX, norB, sul, abc-F ND
a

Whole-genome sequence data were available for all strains. Species designations for non-pathogenic Listeria spp. were made utilizing the whole-genome sequence data as described in Materials and Methods. # Indicates strains were resistant to high levels of cadmium (70 µg/mL). ## Indicates strains were resistant to lower levels of cadmium (35 µg/mL). L. innocua UAM003-1A is also resistant to streptomycin (31).

b

*Indicates bears co-colonized with both tetracycline-resistant and tetracycline-susceptible Listeriae.

c

S, F, and NS are rectal swab, feces, and nasal swab samples, respectively.

d

Novel STs are indicated in bold. ST1495 of L. innocua UAM003-1A was reported before (31). ST, sequence type.

e

AMR determinants were derived from the analysis of the whole-genome sequence data. AMR determinants for L. innocua UAM003-1A were reported before (31).

f

MIC values are in µg/mL. ND, not determined.

Testing of a subpanel of 10 L. innocua strains for resistance to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone revealed that all were resistant to both of these antimicrobials, as also described above with L. monocytogenes. However, and similarly to the results described above with L. monocytogenes, resistance to linezolid was not encountered (data not shown).

Non-pathogenic Listeria strains from black bears are markedly more likely to be resistant to tetracycline than L. monocytogenes

Tetracycline-resistant Listeria strains belonging to species other than L. monocytogenes were isolated from 17 (32%) of the 53 bears that yielded non-pathogenic Listeria spp. (32, 33). This prevalence of tetracycline resistance among non-pathogenic Listeria spp. was noticeably higher than with L. monocytogenes, for which only 6 of the 105 L. monocytogenes-positive bears (5.7%) yielded strains with resistance to tetracycline. These six bears were captured in North Carolina in 2014 (n = 2), 2015 (n = 1), and 2016 (n = 3) (Table 2). All 19 of the non-pathogenic tetracycline-resistant Listeria strains that were sequenced were found to be L. innocua based on analysis of the whole-genome sequence data (Table 2). A higher prevalence of tetracycline resistance among L. innocua than L. monocytogenes from wildlife was also noted, albeit with lower numbers of isolates, from wild rodents in China, where tetracycline resistance was exhibited by 5 of 10 L. innocua isolates, but not among any of the 11 isolates of L. monocytogenes (27).

We did not detect any bears co-colonized by tetracycline-resistant strains of both L. monocytogenes and L. innocua (Table 2). However, the bears were often co-colonized with tetracycline-resistant and tetracycline-susceptible Listeriae (Table 2). Most of the tetracycline-resistant L. innocua strains were from feces or rectal swabs, but three bears yielded tetracycline-resistant L. innocua from nasal swabs (Table 2). For two bears (N061 and N141), tetracycline-resistant L. innocua of the same sequence type (ST) (ST637) was obtained from nasal swabs as well as feces or rectal swabs (Table 2), suggesting the possibility that tetracycline-resistant L. innocua strains had colonized multiple sites of the same animal.

L. monocytogenes and L. innocua from black bears harbor novel tetracycline resistance elements, with pronounced element diversity noted in L. innocua

Tn916.1039 in L. monocytogenes from black bears

All tetracycline-resistant L. monocytogenes strains harbored tet(M) based on PCR, and all six strains that were sequenced (one each from the six bears positive for tetracycline-resistant L. monocytogenes) belonged to ST1039 (Table 2). ST1039 has been identified relatively recently among human clinical isolates of L. monocytogenes (48), and the six bear-derived strains were closely related, with 0–28 core-genome MLST differences and 5–116 allele differences based on whole-genome MLST analysis. In the seven-locus MLST scheme (https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/listeria/), ST1039 matches ST2 at four loci and is a member of the ubiquitous hypervirulent clonal complex (CC) 2 (49). Besides tet(M), all six ST1039 strains harbored fosX, lin, norB, sul, abc-F, and mprF (Table 2), which are routinely detected in L. monocytogenes genomes with fosX mediating inherent fosfomycin resistance, at least during growth in vitro (19, 50).

All six strains harbored an identical Tn916-like, approx. 18-kb novel tetracycline resistance transposon designated Tn916.1039, in the same chromosomal insertion site in the intergenic region between rpoZ and coaBC (Fig. 1). Tn916.1039 shared 99.82% nucleotide sequence identity to Tn916 from Enterococcus faecalis. BLAST of Tn916.1039 against the NCBI nucleotide database revealed matches with 100% coverage and 100% identity with elements in Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, Selenomonas ruminantium, and E. faecalis, as well as multiple matches (100% coverage, >99.8% identity) with other Gram-positive pathogens. Highly similar elements (100% coverage, >99.8% nucleotide identity) were detected, albeit infrequently, in other strains of L. monocytogenes of various serotypes and in L. innocua. Despite the relatively uncommon natural occurrence of these Tn916-like elements in Listeria, Tn916 can be readily mobilized from E. faecalis via conjugation and has been used extensively for transposon mutagenesis in L. monocytogenes (37, 51, 52).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Genomic organization of the Tn916.1039-harboring region in the bear-derived Listeria monocytogenes strain SKB461. The Tn916-like element Tn916.1039 is indicated with the green double-pointed arrow. Open reading frames (ORFs) conserved in the reference strain L. monocytogenes F2365 are in black. The tetracycline resistance determinant tet(M) is in green. The gray scale indicates nucleotide sequence identity (%) in the flanking sequences. Comparative genomic organization was determined as described in Materials and Methods and visualized using EasyFig.

Tn5801-like and Tn6000-like elements in bear-derived L. innocua: Tn5801.UAM, Tn5801.551, and Tn6000.205

As indicated earlier, the non-pathogenic Listeria isolates characterized here were chosen based on their resistance to tetracycline and cadmium. The strains included several STs of L. innocua, of which ST637 (CC140) predominated (Fig. 2). The strains were from various types of samples, i.e., feces, rectal swabs and nasal swabs, with ST637 including strains from all three sample types (Table 2; Fig. 2A). With the exception of one strain (ST603) which exhibited resistance to both tetracycline and cadmium, strains of the other STs were resistant either only to tetracycline (n = 18, 3 STs) or only to cadmium (n = 6, 4 STs). One strain lacked resistance to either compound, and one was resistant to tetracycline as well as streptomycin, as indicated above (Fig. 2B). The latter strain, L. innocua UAM003-1A, was ST1495, with one-allele difference from ST637 and thus a member of the same CC, i.e., CC140 (Fig. 2B).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Minimum spanning trees (MSTs) of the bear-derived Listeria innocua strains investigated in this study. The MST was generated using BioNumerics version 8.1 as described in Materials and Methods. Strains of the same sequence type are grouped into circles, with each division in a circle indicating a separate strain. The circles are connected by lines that reflect relatedness using the seven-locus MLST scheme: thick black line (one allele difference) and thin dotted gray line (four or more allele differences). (A) Strains are color-coded depending on sample type; (B) strains are color-coded to indicate antimicrobial resistance profiles and tetracycline resistance elements that were encountered: Cd35 and Cd70, resistance to cadmium 35 and 70 µg/mL, respectively; Tet and Strep, resistance to tetracycline and streptomycin, respectively. Tetracycline resistance determinant tet(M) or tet(S) is indicated after the transposon designation. PS indicates a strain pan-sensitive to all tested antimicrobial compounds.

Tet(M)-harboring element Tn5801.UAM

The genetic basis of tetracycline resistance proved to be noticeably more diverse in the sequenced L. innocua strains, being mediated by two distinct tet(M) elements as well as a tet(S)-harboring element (Table 2; Fig. 2B). As indicated above for L. monocytogenes, the ubiquitous determinants lin, fosX , norB, sul, and abc-F were also identified in all L. innocua sequenced genomes (Table 2).

The most commonly encountered tetracycline resistance element, Tn5801.UAM, was approx. 20-kb with Guanine-Cytosine (GC) content of 35% and was harbored with 100% conservation by 17 of the 19 tetracycline-resistant bear-derived L. innocua strains with sequenced genomes (Table 2; Fig. 3). In all 17 genomes, Tn5801.UAM was in the same integration site, i.e., the intergenic region adjacent to guaA (Fig. 3). The 17 strains included all 16 L. innocua strains of ST637 from different bears in North Carolina as well as the closely-related L. innocua UAM003-1A (ST1495) from a bear captured in 2017 in California, thousands of kilometers away (Table 2). Phylogenetic analysis indicated that these strains were closely related, with all but one of the ST637 strains partitioning in one highly conserved cluster, while, interestingly, the other cluster consisted of the ST637 strain SKB388 and the ST1495 strain UAM003-1A (Fig. 4). As indicated above, ST637 and ST1495 are members of CC140, which also includes the tetracycline-susceptible reference strain L. innocua CLIP 11262, one of the first Listeria strains to be sequenced (53). L. innocua CLIP 11262 had ST140, and even though it exhibited a single-allele difference from ST637, it was placed clearly apart from ST637 or ST1495 in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Genomic organization of the lmo1096 (guaA) region in the bear-derived strains Listeria innocua UAM003-1a and SKB551. The corresponding region in the bear-derived L. innocua strains SKB662 and SKB476 is also shown, as is L. innocua CLIP11262 (53), used as reference strain. Flanking ORFs conserved in L. innocua CLIP11262 are in black, and the tetracycline resistance determinant tet(M) in the Listeria genomes is in green. Sequences shared specifically between SKB551 and SKB662 are in turquoise, and include a partial Listeria pathogenicity island 3 consisting of llsAGHX. Shared colors in the Listeria genomes indicate homologous ORFs. Dark gray shading across homologous regions is indicative of 99% or greater nucleotide sequence identity. The inset to the right demonstrates a comparison between Tn5801.551 in L. monocytogenes L2624 (serotype 1/2b, ST5, 2011 cantaloupe outbreak) and the canonical Tn916 in E. faecalis. Comparative genomic organizations were determined and visualized as in the legend of Fig. 1.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Phylogenetic relationships among the sequenced bear-derived Listeria innocua strains investigated in this study. The reference strain L. innocua CLIP11262 is included. Strain designations are in the format “strain name_CFSAN number.” SKB115 (ST1481) is not shown. Maximum likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA, with bootstrapping (n = 500); the scale bar indicates distance as assessed by the Tamura-Nei method. Blue, gray, and purple boxes denote the presence of Tn5801.UAM, Tn5801.551, and Tn6000.205, respectively; white boxes denote the absence of tetracycline resistance elements.

It is remarkable that Tn5801.UAM was harbored by ST637 and 1495 strains from multiple bears and all three animal sample types (Table 2; Fig. 2). The predominance of this element among the tetracycline-resistant L. innocua strains in our panel may reflect possible fitness advantages that it may confer to L. innocua colonizing the bears, or possibly the overall higher fitness of L. innocua strains of ST637/ST1495 in this wildlife host. It is also possible that these strains may have higher fitness in harborage sites in the environment (e.g., soil, rhizosphere, or aquatic niches) and thus may be more likely to be acquired by the animals.

BLAST searches identified elements highly similar to Tn5801.UAM (100% coverage, >99.7% identity) in certain strains of L. monocytogenes serotypes 1/2a and 1/2b and in L. innocua, as well as multiple other Gram-positive bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus mitis, and Mammaliicoccus sciuri. A previous genomic analysis of over 5,000 genomes of Firmicutes identified Tn5801-like elements in many of the same genera and, interestingly, in the same genomic location (54). The guaA locus has been previously identified as a genomic hotspot both in bacteria and archaea (55). In L. monocytogenes, this hotspot can harbor a wide variety of gene cassettes, including Listeria pathogenicity island 3 (LIPI-3) (56, 57), and our findings suggest that it serves as a hotspot in L. innocua as well. All strains in our L. innocua panel except SKB205 appeared to harbor additional sequences adjacent to guaA, with several distinct cassettes identified in this location (Fig. 3). Indeed, analysis of L. innocua strains from black bears and water has revealed a partial, truncated form of LIPI-3 in many of the genomes in the guaA hotspot, while full-length LIPI-3 was detected in three strains, one of which, the tetracycline-susceptible strain SKB154 (ST1086), was from a bear (58) and was included in our panel (Fig. 4). None of the examined ST637 and ST1495 strains from the bears harbored LIPI-3 in this location (58). Collectively, the findings suggest that in L. innocua, the guaA hotspot harbors the tetracycline resistance element Tn5801.UAM in tetracycline-resistant strains of ST637/ST1495, while in most other strains, this genomic hotspot harbors LIPI-3 or other, unrelated genomic content.

It is noteworthy that even though Tn5801.UAM was repeatedly encountered in L. innocua, it was absent from L. monocytogenes from the black bears. It is possible that the element was only recently acquired by L. innocua of ST637 and closely related STs and has not yet disseminated to L. monocytogenes. The temporal distribution of Tn5801.UAM-harboring L. innocua strains in black bears from North Carolina was also intriguing, since all were recovered between April and September 2016, with the exception of one strain in 2015 (Table 2). The underlying reasons remain unknown and may reflect ecological conditions favoring ST637 during one of the years of the study. Alternatively, it is possible that tetracycline-resistant L. innocua strains of ST637 became introduced in the region in 2015 and began to proliferate subsequently. Further surveillance would be needed to determine whether L. innocua ST637 harboring Tn5801.UAM continues to be repeatedly isolated from black bears in this region and to also elucidate the distribution of Tn5801.UAM in L. innocua from other sources and regions.

Tet(M)-harboring element Tn5801.551

A different chromosomal tet(M)-harboring element was identified in the bear-derived strains L. innocua SKB115 and SKB551 of the novel ST1481, phylogenetically highly distinct from ST637/ST1495 (Table 2; Fig. 2B). This approx. 21-kb element (designated Tn5801.551) was earlier detected in L. innocua SKB551 in the course of the analysis of LIPI-3 distribution and genomic content in the guaA hotspot in L. innocua from bears and surface water (58). Tn5801.551 is integrated in the same guaA site as Tn5801.UAM, and is a component of a larger genomic island of approx. 63-kb with GC content of 31.3% (Fig. 3). Interestingly, a partial LIPI-3 consisting of llsAGHX was also identified in this island, adjacent to Tn5801.551 (58). BLAST of the entire 63-kb island against the NCBI database suggested that it was unique to SKB115 and SKB551, as there were no matches with high identity and over 65% coverage. SKB115 and SKB551 were highly related, harboring only 76 core-genome MLST differences and 160 allele differences based on whole-genome MLST analysis but were isolated from two different bears almost 2 years apart (Table 2). These findings suggest that L. innocua with the novel ST1481 harboring the 63-kb island with Tn5801.551 may be established in the wild bears in this region, even though they are less commonly encountered than strains of ST637.

Tn5801.551 had high similarity with Tn5801.UAM, but two ORFs (annotated as a hypothetical protein and a transposase) were only present in SKB115 and SKB551, while two others (annotated as a DNA helicase and an endonuclease) were lacking (Fig. 3). Interestingly, Tn5801.551 was found via BLAST analysis to be identical (100% nucleotide sequence identity and coverage) to strains of L. monocytogenes ST5 (serotype 1/2b), including strain L2624 and other ST5 strains implicated in a major multistate outbreak of human listeriosis in 2011 in the United States, involving whole cantaloupe (59, 60). In the ST5 L. monocytogenes strain L2624 from this outbreak, Tn5801.551 was integrated in this same guaA location that we found to harbor Tn5801.UAM and Tn5801.551 in L. innocua (Fig. 3).

Similarly to Tn5801.UAM, Tn5801.551 was widely disseminated among Gram-positive bacteria, with highly conserved counterparts (100% coverage and >99.9% identity) in Lactobacillus amylophilus and the pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae. These findings, together with the detection of this element in outbreak-associated strains of L. monocytogenes, suggest potential roles of non-pathogenic species such as L. innocua in the acquisition and circulation of AMR among pathogenic bacteria. However, Tn5801.551 remains relatively uncommon in Listeria, and additional work is required to determine if this is due to recent acquisition, limitations on transferability, or potential fitness costs.

Interestingly, a segment of the novel genomic island that harbors Tn5801.551 in the two ST1481 strains was also identified in the guaA hotspot in L. innocua SKB662, a member of the novel ST1472, and all other ST1482 strains, and further BLAST analysis indicated that this shared segment (shown in turquoise in Fig. 3) corresponded to the partial LIPI-3 (llsAGHX) (Fig. 3 and data not shown). The ST1482 strains were isolated from three different bears in the summer of 2016 (Table 2) and were included in the analysis because three of the four exhibited the same level of resistance to cadmium, while the fourth was susceptible to cadmium but from the same animal that yielded a cadmium-resistant strain (Table 2; Fig. 2B). They are closely related to each other (Fig. 4) and phylogenetically quite distinct from ST1481, with none of the alleles in the seven-locus MLST scheme shared between STs 1481 and 1482 (Fig. 2A). The organization of this region in L. innocua SKB115, SKB551, SKB662, and the other three ST1482 strains supports the hypothesis that this chromosomal hotspot may have progressively accumulated novel genomic content, including Tn5801.551.

Novel tet(S)-harboring element in Listeria, Tn6000.205

One of the 19 tetracycline-resistant L. innocua strains (strain SKB205, ST603) was found to harbor tet(S) on an element of approx. 30-kb with a GC content of 34.6%. The tet(S)-harboring element was located in the intergenic region between lin2691 and lin2692 and was designated Tn6000.205 (Fig. 5). The Tn6000.205-harboring strain SKB205 was not closely related to any other strains in our panel (Fig. 2B; Fig. 4). BLAST analysis with Tn6000.205 indicated strong matches (100% coverage, >99.9% nucleotide identity) with certain L. monocytogenes strains of ST/CC 288 (serotype 1/2b) and CC2 (serotype 4b) from food and clinical sources, as well as exact matches with certain strains of L. innocua. Strong matches (100% coverage, >99.9% nucleotide identity) with Tn6000.205 were noted with several other Gram-positive bacteria including Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus casseliflavus, E. faecium, Enterococcus raffinosus, and Streptococcus canis.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Genomic location and genetic organization of the Tn7056-harboring region in bear-derived Listeria innocua SKB205. The Tn6000-like element Tn6000.205 is indicated with the blue double-pointed arrow. ORFs conserved in the reference strain L. innocua CLIP11262 are in black. The tetracycline resistance determinant tet(S) is in purple. The gray scale indicates nucleotide sequence identity (%) in the flanking sequences. Comparative genomic organizations were determined and visualized as in the legend of Fig. 1.

Tetracycline resistance is the most common antimicrobial resistance trait encountered in Listeria, and it is most commonly conferred by tet(M), while tet(S) and other determinants such as tet(L) and tet(A) are encountered infrequently (19, 31, 61). While there have been numerous surveys of AMR among clinical and food-related isolates of L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. (60, 62), AMR among strains from wildlife remains poorly understood. Acquired AMR in Listeria appears to be generally uncommon, regardless of the source (24). This is supported by our findings, which indicated low prevalence of acquired AMR among L. monocytogenes from black bears. Interestingly, we detected a considerably higher prevalence of tetracycline resistance among non-pathogenic Listeria spp. from the black bears than among L. monocytogenes from the same animals. The extent to which this finding may also pertain to Listeria from environmental sources such as soil or water remains to be determined. Another intriguing finding was that, in contrast to the bear-derived tetracycline-resistant L. monocytogenes strains which harbored a single tetracycline resistance element, three different elements were identified among tetracycline-resistant L. innocua from the black bears.

Of special interest was the Tn5801.UAM element harbored at the same chromosomal location in genetically related strains of L. innocua CC140 isolated thousands of kilometers apart, from multiple individuals and diverse sample types, suggesting a tetracycline-resistant L. innocua clone highly efficient in colonizing this wildlife host in the United States. Another noteworthy finding was the discovery of L. innocua that harbored Tn5801.551 identical to a tetracycline resistance element in L. monocytogenes of ST5 implicated in a major produce-associated outbreak in the United States in 2011 (59, 60). This is of particular interest, since this appears to be the first major outbreak of listeriosis involving strains with acquired AMR. This finding, together with the noticeably higher prevalence of tetracycline resistance and diversity of the corresponding genetic elements among non-pathogenic Listeria spp. than L. monocytogenes, support the hypothesis that non-pathogenic species of Listeria may contribute to the dissemination of AMR elements to L. monocytogenes strains, which may subsequently become implicated in human listeriosis. The trajectories via which strains harboring the AMR elements may eventually contaminate the human food supply currently remain poorly understood. Potential dissemination of AMR by non-pathogenic Listeria species may be also suggested by the fact that tetracycline resistance elements harbored by the bear-derived L. innocua strains were identical or highly similar to those detected among several other Gram-positive pathogens. Additionally, the average GC content of each of the three tetracycline resistance elements from L. innocua was below the average GC content of L. innocua or L. monocytogenes (approx. 38%) (52, 63), supporting acquisition via horizontal gene transfer from other organisms. While non-pathogenic Listeria species are not a direct threat to human health, they may be able to serve as reservoirs and vehicles for the retention, amplification, and dissemination of resistance elements in natural ecosystems, with serious implications for human and animal health. Further investigations are needed to elucidate the roles of wildlife and non-pathogenic Listeria species in the circulation of these AMR determinants in the natural environment (e.g., water and soil) and at the human-wildlife interface.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is partially supported by the AFRI-ELI under award # 2017–67012-26001 and 2018–67017-29581 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA. The field portion of the project was funded by the Pittman-Robertson Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Grant and is a joint research project between the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and the Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program at North Carolina State University.

We are grateful to all the homeowners who granted us permission and access to their properties for bear trapping and den work. We thank North Carolina State University biologist J. Strules for her data collection and commitment to the project. Also, we thank N. Hartsoe, A. Sadat, Z. Hanafy, and J. Jackson for their assistance with the antimicrobial resistance screening.

Contributor Information

Phillip Brown, Email: pebrown4@ncsu.edu.

Sophia Kathariou, Email: skathar@ncsu.edu.

Charles M. Dozois, INRS Armand-Frappier Sante Biotechnologie Research Centre, Laval, Quebec, Canada

DATA AVAILABILITY

Fastq reads for strains of Listeria monocytogenes SKB111, SKB121, SKB297, SKB461, SKB537, and SKB542 harboring Tn916.1039 have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) short-read archive under accession numbers SRR13643220, SRR13642654, SRR6395255, SRR6395704, SRR6397048, and SRR6395509, respectively. Listeria innocua strains SKB363, SKB410, SKB415, SKB453, SKB572, SKB626, SKB635, SKB638, SKB650, SKB663, SKB673, SKB687, SKB713, SKB716, and UAM003-1A harboring Tn5801.UAM have been deposited under accession numbers SRR1364323, SRR13643206, SRR13643216, SRR13643183, SRR13643006, SRR13642913, SRR13642681, SRR13642689, SRR13642916, SRR13642642, SRR13642647, SRR13642667, SRR13642991, SRR13642980, and SRR9827491, respectively. L. innocua strains SKB 115 (Tn5801.551), SKB551(Tn5801.551), and SKB205 (Tn6000.205) have been deposited under accession numbers SRR22299583, SRR13643008, and SRR13642649, respectively. FASTA sequences of the transposon regions for Tn916.1039, Tn5801.UAM, Tn5801.551, and Tn6000.205 were deposited in the NCBI database under accession numbers OP846513, OP846514, OP846515, and OP846516, respectively.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Painter J, Slutsker L. 2007. Listeriosis in humans, p 85–109. In Listeria, Listeriosis and food safety [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Freitag NE, Port GC, Miner MD. 2009. Listeria monocytogenes - from saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:623–628. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sauders BD, Overdevest J, Fortes E, Windham K, Schukken Y, Lembo A, Wiedmann M. 2012. Diversity of Listeria species in urban and natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4420–4433. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00282-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vivant A-L, Garmyn D, Piveteau P. 2013. Listeria monocytogenes, a down-to-earth pathogen. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3:87. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Schlech WF. 2019. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Listeria monocytogenes infection. Microbiol Spectr 7. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0014-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Leclercq A, Moura A, Vales G, Tessaud-Rita N, Aguilhon C, Lecuit M. 2019. Listeria thailandensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:74–81. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Núñez-Montero K, Leclercq A, Moura A, Vales G, Peraza J, Pizarro-Cerdá J, Lecuit M. 2018. Listeria costaricensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:844–850. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Orsi RH, Wiedmann M. 2016. Characteristics and distribution of Listeria spp., including Listeria species newly described since 2009. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5273–5287. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7552-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Quereda JJ, Leclercq A, Moura A, Vales G, Gómez-Martín Á, García-Muñoz Á, Thouvenot P, Tessaud-Rita N, Bracq-Dieye H, Lecuit M. 2020. Listeria valentina sp. nov., isolated from a water trough and the faeces of healthy sheep. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5868–5879. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Raufu IA, Moura A, Vales G, Ahmed OA, Aremu A, Thouvenot P, Tessaud-Rita N, Bracq-Dieye H, Krishnamurthy R, Leclercq A, Lecuit M. 2022. Listeria ilorinensis sp. nov., isolated from cow milk cheese in Nigeria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Carlin CR, Liao J, Weller DL, Guo X, Orsi R, Wiedmann M. 2021. Corrigendum: Listeria cossartiae sp. nov., Listeria farberi sp. nov., Listeria immobilis sp. nov., Listeria portnoyi sp. nov. and Listeria rustica sp. nov., isolated from agricultural water and natural environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71:004885. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lyautey E, Hartmann A, Pagotto F, Tyler K, Lapen DR, Wilkes G, Piveteau P, Rieu A, Robertson WJ, Medeiros DT, Edge TA, Gannon V, Topp E. 2007. Characteristics and frequency of detection of fecal Listeria monocytogenes shed by livestock, wildlife, and humans. Can J Microbiol 53:1158–1167. doi: 10.1139/W07-084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wesley IV. 2007. Listeriosis in animals, p 56–60. In Ryser ET, Marth EH (ed), Listeria, Listeriosis, and food safety, 3rd ed. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ivanek R, Gröhn YT, Wiedmann M. 2006. Listeria monocytogenes in multiple habitats and host populations: review of available data for mathematical modeling. Foodborne Pathog Dis 3:319–336. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Palacios-Gorba C, Moura A, Leclercq A, Gómez-Martín Á, Gomis J, Jiménez-Trigos E, Mocé ML, Lecuit M, Quereda JJ. 2021. Listeria spp. isolated from tonsils of wild deer and boars: genomic characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e02651-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02651-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Daszak P. 2008. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451:990–993. doi: 10.1038/nature06536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vittecoq M, Godreuil S, Prugnolle F, Durand P, Brazier L, Renaud N, Arnal A, Aberkane S, Jean‐Pierre H, Gauthier‐Clerc M, Thomas F, Renaud F, McCallum H. 2016. Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife. J Appl Ecol 53:519–529. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12596 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Balbin MM, Hull D, Guest C, Nichols L, Dunn R, Hull D, Thakur S. 2020. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors profile of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli isolated from different environments exposed to anthropogenic activity. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 22:578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Baquero F, F Lanza V, Duval M, Coque TM. 2020. Ecogenetics of antibiotic resistance in Listeria monocytogenes. Mol Microbiol 113:570–579. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Troxler R, von Graevenitz A, Funke G, Wiedemann B, Stock I. 2000. Natural antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria species: L. grayi, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L. monocytogenes, L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri strains. Clin Microbiol Infect 6:525–535. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00168.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hof H. 2004. An update on the medical management of listeriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 5:1727–1735. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.8.1727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) . 2021. Information for health professionals and laboratories. Listeria (Listeriosis). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/technical.html#patient-mgmt
  • 23. Luque-Sastre L, Arroyo C, Fox EM, McMahon BJ, Bai L, Li F, Fanning S. 2018. Antimicrobial resistance in Listeria species. Microbiol Spectr 6. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0031-2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Granier SA, Moubareck C, Colaneri C, Lemire A, Roussel S, Dao T-T, Courvalin P, Brisabois A. 2011. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from food and the environment in France over a 10-year period. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2788–2790. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01381-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Korsak D, Szuplewska M. 2016. Characterization of nonpathogenic Listeria species isolated from food and food processing environment. Int J Food Microbiol 238:274–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Brown P, Chen Y, Siletzky R, Parsons C, Jaykus L-A, Eifert J, Ryser E, Logue CM, Stam C, Brown E, Kathariou S. 2021. Harnessing whole genome sequence data for facility-specific signatures for Listeria monocytogenes: a case study with turkey processing plants in the United States. Front Sustain Food Syst 5. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.742353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wang Y, Lu L, Lan R, Salazar JK, Liu J, Xu J, Ye C. 2017. Isolation and characterization of Listeria species from rodents in natural environments in China. Emerg Microbes Infect 6:e44. doi: 10.1038/emi.2017.28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cao X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li H, Luo L, Wang P, Zhang L, Li H, Liu J, Lu L, Ye C. 2019. Prevalence and characteristics of Listeria ivanovii strains in wild rodents in China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 19:8–15. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cilia G, Turchi B, Fratini F, Bilei S, Bossù T, Cerri D, Pacini MI, Bertelloni F, ML . 2021. Prevalence, virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica and Listeria monocytogenes in European wild boar (Sus scrofa) hunted in Tuscany (central Italy). Pathogens 10:93. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Krawczyk-Balska A, Markiewicz Z. 2016. The intrinsic cephalosporin resistome of Listeria monocytogenes in the context of stress response, gene regulation, pathogenesis and therapeutics. J Appl Microbiol 120:251–265. doi: 10.1111/jam.12989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Needle DB, Marr JL, Park CJ, Andam CP, Wise AG, Maes RK, Wilkes RP, Anis EA, Sidor IF, Agnew D, Ellis JC, Tate P, Mathewson A, Benton C, Gibson R. 2020. Concurrent infection of skunk adenovirus-1, Listeria monocytogenes, and a regionally specific clade of canine distemper virus in one gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) and concurrent listeriosis and canine distemper in a second gray fox. Pathogens 9:591. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9070591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Parsons C, Chen Y, Niedermeyer J, Hernandez K, Kathariou S. 2019. Draft genome sequence of multidrug-resistant Listeria innocua strain UAM003-1A, isolated from a wild black bear (Ursus americanus). Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e01281-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01281-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Parsons C, Niedermeyer J, Gould N, Brown P, Strules J, Parsons AW, Bernardo Mesa-Cruz J, Kelly MJ, Hooker MJ, Chamberlain MJ, Olfenbuttel C, DePerno C, Kathariou S. 2020. Listeria monocytogenes at the human-wildlife interface: black bears (Ursus americanus) as potential vehicles for Listeria. Microb Biotechnol 13:706–721. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Brown P, Chen Y, Ivanova M, Leekitcharoenphon P, Parsons C, Niedermeyer J, Gould N, Strules J, Mesa-Cruz JB, Kelly MJ, Hooker MJ, Chamberlain MJ, Olfenbuttel C, DePerno C, Elhanafi D, Kathariou S, Rasko D. 2023. Draft genome sequences of 158 Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from black bears (Ursus americanus) in the United States. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0024823. doi: 10.1128/mra.00248-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Katharios-Lanwermeyer S, Rakic-Martinez M, Elhanafi D, Ratani S, Tiedje JM, Kathariou S. 2012. Coselection of cadmium and benzalkonium chloride resistance in conjugative transfers from nonpathogenic Listeria spp. to other Listeriae. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7549–7556. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02245-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Charpentier E, Gerbaud G, Jacquet C, Rocourt J, Courvalin P. 1995. Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Listeria species. J Infect Dis 172:277–281. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.1.277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Linke K, Rückerl I, Brugger K, Karpiskova R, Walland J, Muri-Klinger S, Tichy A, Wagner M, Stessl B. 2014. Reservoirs of Listeria species in three environmental ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5583–5592. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01018-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Portnoy DA, Jacks PS, Hinrichs DJ. 1988. Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes. J Exp Med 167:1459–1471. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.4.1459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Price R, Jayeola V, Niedermeyer J, Parsons C, Kathariou S. 2018. The Listeria monocytogenes key virulence determinants hly and prfA are involved in biofilm formation and aggregation but not colonization of fresh produce. Pathogens 7:18. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7010018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Seemann T. 2020. Github. Available from: https://github.com/tseemann/mlst
  • 41. Davis S, Pettengill JB, Luo Y, Payne J, Shpuntoff A, Rand H, Strain E. 2015. CFSAN SNP pipeline: an automated method for constructing SNP matrices from next-generation sequence data. PeerJ Comput Sci 1:e20. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.20 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Bun C, Conrad N, Dietrich EM, Disz T, Gabbard JL, Gerdes S, Henry CS, Kenyon RW, Machi D, Mao C, Nordberg EK, Olsen GJ, Murphy-Olson DE, Olson R, Overbeek R, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Warren A, Xia F, Yoo H, Stevens RL. 2017. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Moura A, Criscuolo A, Pouseele H, Maury MM, Leclercq A, Tarr C, Björkman JT, Dallman T, Reimer A, Enouf V, Larsonneur E, Carleton H, Bracq-Dieye H, Katz LS, Jones L, Touchon M, Tourdjman M, Walker M, Stroika S, Cantinelli T, Chenal-Francisque V, Kucerova Z, Rocha EPC, Nadon C, Grant K, Nielsen EM, Pot B, Gerner-Smidt P, Lecuit M, Brisse S. 2016. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat Microbiol 2:16185. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Lee S, Chen Y, Gorski L, Ward TJ, Osborne J, Kathariou S. 2018. Listeria monocytogenes source distribution analysis indicates regional heterogeneity and ecological niche preference among serotype 4b clones. mBio 9:e00396-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00396-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Maury MM, Tsai Y-H, Charlier C, Touchon M, Chenal-Francisque V, Leclercq A, Criscuolo A, Gaultier C, Roussel S, Brisabois A, Disson O, Rocha EPC, Brisse S, Lecuit M. 2016. Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat Genet 48:308–313. doi: 10.1038/ng.3501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Scortti M, Lacharme-Lora L, Wagner M, Chico-Calero I, Losito P, Vázquez-Boland JA. 2006. Coexpression of virulence and fosfomycin susceptibility in Listeria: molecular basis of an antimicrobial in vitro-in vivo paradox. Nat Med 12:515–517. doi: 10.1038/nm1396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kathariou S, Metz P, Hof H, Goebel W. 1987. Tn916-induced mutations in the hemolysin determinant affecting virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. J Bacteriol 169:1291–1297. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.3.1291-1297.1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Bertrand S, Huys G, Yde M, D’Haene K, Tardy F, Vrints M, Swings J, Collard J-M. 2005. Detection and characterization of tet(M) in tetracycline-resistant Listeria strains from human and food-processing origins in Belgium and France. J Med Microbiol 54:1151–1156. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46142-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Glaser P, Frangeul L, Buchrieser C, Rusniok C, Amend A, Baquero F, Berche P, Bloecker H, Brandt P, Chakraborty T, Charbit A, Chetouani F, Couvé E, de Daruvar A, Dehoux P, Domann E, Domínguez-Bernal G, Duchaud E, Durant L, Dussurget O, Entian KD, Fsihi H, García-del Portillo F, Garrido P, Gautier L, Goebel W, Gómez-López N, Hain T, Hauf J, Jackson D, Jones LM, Kaerst U, Kreft J, Kuhn M, Kunst F, Kurapkat G, Madueno E, Maitournam A, Vicente JM, Ng E, Nedjari H, Nordsiek G, Novella S, de Pablos B, Pérez-Diaz JC, Purcell R, Remmel B, Rose M, Schlueter T, Simoes N, Tierrez A, Vázquez-Boland JA, Voss H, Wehland J, Cossart P. 2001. Comparative genomics of Listeria species. Science 294:849–852. doi: 10.1126/science.1063447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. León-Sampedro R, Novais C, Peixe L, Baquero F, Coque TM. 2016. Diversity and evolution of the Tn5801-tet(M)-like integrative and conjugative elements among Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1736–1746. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01864-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Song L, Pan Y, Chen S, Zhang X. 2012. Structural characteristics of genomic islands associated with GMP synthases as integration hotspot among sequenced microbial genomes. Comput Biol Chem 36:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2012.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Cheng Y, Kim JW, Lee S, Siletzky RM, Kathariou S. 2010. DNA probes for unambiguous identification of Listeria monocytogenes epidemic clone II strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3061–3068. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03064-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kuenne C, Billion A, Mraheil MA, Strittmatter A, Daniel R, Goesmann A, Barbuddhe S, Hain T, Chakraborty T. 2013. Reassessment of the Listeria monocytogenes pan-genome reveals dynamic integration hotspots and mobile genetic elements as major components of the accessory genome. BMC Genomics 14:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lee S, Parsons C, Chen Y, Dungan RS, Kathariou S. 2023. Contrasting genetic diversity of Listeria pathogenicity islands 3 and 4 harbored by nonpathogenic Listeria spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 89:e0209722. doi: 10.1128/aem.02097-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. McCollum JT, Cronquist AB, Silk BJ, Jackson KA, O’Connor KA, Cosgrove S, Gossack JP, Parachini SS, Jain NS, Ettestad P, Ibraheem M, Cantu V, Joshi M, DuVernoy T, Fogg NW, Gorny JR, Mogen KM, Spires C, Teitell P, Joseph LA, Tarr CL, Imanishi M, Neil KP, Tauxe RV, Mahon BE. 2013. Multistate outbreak of listeriosis associated with cantaloupe. N Engl J Med 369:944–953. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Yang H, Hoffmann M, Allard MW, Brown EW, Chen Y. 2020. Microevolution and gain or loss of mobile genetic elements of outbreak-related Listeria monocytogenes in food processing environments identified by whole genome sequencing analysis. Front Microbiol 11:866. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Morvan A, Moubareck C, Leclercq A, Hervé-Bazin M, Bremont S, Lecuit M, Courvalin P, Le Monnier A. 2010. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from humans in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2728–2731. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01557-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Charpentier E, Courvalin P. 1999. Antibiotic resistance in Listeria spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2103–2108. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.9.2103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Nelson KE, Fouts DE, Mongodin EF, Ravel J, DeBoy RT, Kolonay JF, Rasko DA, Angiuoli SV, Gill SR, Paulsen IT, Peterson J, White O, Nelson WC, Nierman W, Beanan MJ, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Madupu R, Haft DH, Selengut J, Van Aken S, Khouri H, Fedorova N, Forberger H, Tran B, Kathariou S, Wonderling LD, Uhlich GA, Bayles DO, Luchansky JB, Fraser CM. 2004. Whole genome comparisons of serotype 4b and 1/2a strains of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes reveal new insights into the core genome components of this species. Nucleic Acids Res 32:2386–2395. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Fastq reads for strains of Listeria monocytogenes SKB111, SKB121, SKB297, SKB461, SKB537, and SKB542 harboring Tn916.1039 have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) short-read archive under accession numbers SRR13643220, SRR13642654, SRR6395255, SRR6395704, SRR6397048, and SRR6395509, respectively. Listeria innocua strains SKB363, SKB410, SKB415, SKB453, SKB572, SKB626, SKB635, SKB638, SKB650, SKB663, SKB673, SKB687, SKB713, SKB716, and UAM003-1A harboring Tn5801.UAM have been deposited under accession numbers SRR1364323, SRR13643206, SRR13643216, SRR13643183, SRR13643006, SRR13642913, SRR13642681, SRR13642689, SRR13642916, SRR13642642, SRR13642647, SRR13642667, SRR13642991, SRR13642980, and SRR9827491, respectively. L. innocua strains SKB 115 (Tn5801.551), SKB551(Tn5801.551), and SKB205 (Tn6000.205) have been deposited under accession numbers SRR22299583, SRR13643008, and SRR13642649, respectively. FASTA sequences of the transposon regions for Tn916.1039, Tn5801.UAM, Tn5801.551, and Tn6000.205 were deposited in the NCBI database under accession numbers OP846513, OP846514, OP846515, and OP846516, respectively.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES