Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 2023 Nov 29;383:p2774. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p2774

Phasing out fossil fuels would save millions of lives worldwide

Heli Lehtomäki 1,, Shilpa Rao 2, Otto Hänninen 1
PMCID: PMC10686099  PMID: 38030218

Abstract

A rapid and just transition to cleaner energy is needed


Fossil fuels are the principal driver of the climate change currently damaging human health, wellbeing, and ecosystems, and posing a threat to overall planetary health.1 2 Fossil fuels are also a major source of particulate matter and ozone.3 These air pollutants are responsible for a wide range of adverse health outcomes, including an estimated 6.7 million deaths globally in 2019.3 However, deaths are only one part of the problem. Improved air quality would reduce the burden of several major diseases leading to healthier and longer lives, fewer patients requiring admission to hospital and other treatments, and decreasing the burden on health systems worldwide.

Accumulating evidence shows that air pollution causes systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, leading to deterioration of cardiovascular and respiratory health, and adverse effects on nervous systems, metabolism, and mental and reproductive health.4 Air pollution might work as a trigger, accelerating disease progression, and worsening people’s health and prognosis. Young children, pregnant women, elderly people, and people who have chronic diseases are especially susceptible to the effects of air pollution.

In a linked study, Lelieveld and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077784) quantified the potential effect of fossil fuel phase-out on human lives.5 They estimate that in 2019, 8.3 million (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 11.2) deaths worldwide were attributable to fine particles (PM2.5) and ozone (O3). Overall, fossil fuels were linked to 61% (5.1 million; 95% confidence interval 3.6 to 6.3) of all deaths related to PM2.5 and O3. The proportion of fossil fuel related deaths from all deaths related to air pollution varied from 25% to 85% among different regions of the world. The lowest proportions (in Sub-Saharan and North Africa and the Middle East) are mainly explained by the higher proportion of deaths related to natural emissions, such as desert dust, in these regions.

Lelieveld and colleagues’ estimates of fossil fuel-related deaths are larger than most previously reported values suggesting that the phasing out of fossil fuels might have a greater impact on mortality than previously thought.6 7 They used a new model to quantify the associations between exposure and health outcome, which led to larger estimates.8 Their model was based solely on studies of ambient air pollution whereas some earlier models included other exposures as well. Differences in the models used have been identified as one of the main factors contributing to variations in health risk assessments.9 10

Phasing out the use of fossil fuels would have health benefits far beyond reducing premature mortality. Although numbers of attributable deaths provide an estimate of the health effects of fossil fuels, they do not account for the morbidity associated with air pollution. Quantifying the health burden using disability adjusted life years would account for loss of health, in addition to loss of life.

Clean renewable energy sources are needed to replace fossil fuels. The share of renewable energy in global electricity generation was 28% in 2020.11 To get a more complete picture of the health and climate benefits of the fossil fuel phase-out, the effects of switching to alternative technologies need to be accounted for. Transition to renewable biofuels is not emission free, and while other approaches such as wind, sun, and geothermal power, remove air pollutants efficiently, they might also introduce other adverse effects on the environment and human health. These effects will need to be explored in further research.

As the 28th UN climate summit (COP28) begins on 30 November 2023, we urge country leaders to commit to an accelerated, just, and equitable phase-out of fossil fuels.12 High income countries must agree to lead the way. Although climate related impacts of such a transition are evident, Lelieveld and colleagues show that such a strategy would also save lives by reducing air pollution. The benefits of fossil fuel phase-out on global health, in addition to the climate, must be recognised and play a key role in shaping discussions at COP28.

Acknowledgments

We thank chief physician Mikaela Grotenfelt-Enegren and research, development and innovation programme director Jaana Halonen for their valuable comments.

Competing interests: The BMJ has judged that there are no disqualifying financial ties to commercial companies. The authors declare the following other interests: none. Further details of The BMJ policy on financial interests are here: https://www.bmj.com/sites/default/files/attachments/resources/2016/03/16-current-bmj-education-coi-form.pdf

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned, not peer reviewed.

References

  • 1. IPCC . Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. International Panel for Climate Change, 2023: 1-34, 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.00. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Halonen JI, Erhola M, Furman E, et al. The Helsinki Declaration 2020: Europe that protects. Lancet Planet Health 2020;4:e503-5. 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30242-4  [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fuller R, Landrigan PJ, Balakrishnan K, et al. Pollution and health: a progress update. Lancet Planet Health 2022;6:e535-47. 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0  [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.US Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for particulate matter, final report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-19/188, Dec 2019.
  • 5. Lelieveld J, Haines A, Burnett R, et al. Air pollution deaths attributable to fossil fuels: modelling study. 2023;383:e077784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lelieveld J, Klingmüller K, Pozzer A, Burnett RT, Haines A, Ramanathan V. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116:7192-7. 10.1073/pnas.1819989116  [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Romanello M, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, et al. The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels. Lancet 2022;400:1619-54. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9  [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Burnett RT, Spadaro JV, Garcia GR, Pope CA. Designing health impact functions to assess marginal changes in outdoor fine particulate matter. Environ Res 2022;204:112245. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112245  [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pozzer A, Anenberg SC, Dey S, Haines A, Lelieveld J, Chowdhury S. Mortality attributable to ambient air pollution: a review of global estimates. GeoHealth 2023;7:e2022GH000711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lehtomäki H, Geels C, Brandt J, et al. Deaths attributable to air pollution in Nordic countries: Disparities in the estimates. Atmosphere 2020;11:467 10.3390/atmos11050467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. IEA . World energy outlook 2021. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA), 2021. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/4ed140c1-c3f3-4fd9-acae-789a4e14a23c/WorldEnergyOutlook2021.pdf.
  • 12. Global Health Leadership Organisation . Open Letter on fossil fuels from the Global Medical and Health Community. Biomol Biomed 2023. 10.17305/bb.2023.9996. https://www.bjbms.org/ojs/index.php/bjbms/article/view/9996 [DOI]

Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES