Skip to main content
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1982 Summer;17(2):113–123.

Professionalism, Accountability and Peer Review

Roice D Luke 1,2, Robert E Modrow 1,2
PMCID: PMC1068670  PMID: 6954151

Abstract

Passage in April 1979 of the new hospital standard on quality assurance by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH) has given impetus to the development of an expanded literature on the organizational/behavioral aspects of quality assurance. In response to this need for new literature, several conferences on quality assurance were held resulting in the preparation for publication of the four papers included in this special issue of Health Services Research.

This paper presents the general orientation which guided selection of the papers. It suggests that if the health sector is to reconcile professional expectations for autonomy with evolving institutional accountabilities for aggregate quality and cost, there must be 1) an expansion of the domain of professional concern from quality to both cost and quality and 2) the development of explicit mechanisms of control both within and external to health institutions.

Full text

PDF
113

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson O. W., Shields M. C. Quality measurement and control in physician decision making: state of the art. Health Serv Res. 1982 Summer;17(2):125–155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Luke R. D., Boss R. W. Barriers limiting the implementation of quality assurance programs. Health Serv Res. 1981 Fall;16(3):305–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McNerney W. J. Control of health-care costs in the 1980's. N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 6;303(19):1088–1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198011063031904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES