Abstract
The usefulness of an action-research model is demonstrated in the evaluation and improvement of ambulatory medical care in a variety of settings: solo office practice, prepaid capitation multiple-specialty group practice, and medical school hospital-based outpatient clinic practice. Improvements in the process of medical care are found to relate directly to the intensity and duration of planned interventions by the study group and are demonstrated to follow organizational changes in the participating sites--primarily managerial and support services initiated by policy decisions in each study site. Improvement in performance approaching one standard deviation results from the most intense intervention, about one-half standard deviation at the next level of intervention, and virtually no change from a simple feedback of performance measures. On the basis of these findings and other operational and research efforts to improve physician performance, it is unlikely that simple feedback of performance measures will elicit a change in behavior. However, noncoercive methods involving health care providers in problem identification, problem solving, and solution implementation are demonstrated to be effective.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bloom B. S., Peterson O. L. End results, cost and productivity of coronary-care units. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jan 11;288(2):72–78. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197301112880205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helfer R. E. Estimating the quality of patient care in a pediatric emergency room. J Med Educ. 1967 Mar;42(3):244–248. doi: 10.1097/00001888-196703000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hulka B. S., Cassel J. C. The AAFP-UNC study of the organization, utilization, and assessment of primary medical care. Am J Public Health. 1973 Jun;63(6):494–501. doi: 10.2105/ajph.63.6.494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inui T. S., Yourtee E. L., Williamson J. W. Improved outcomes in hypertension after physician tutorials. A controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1976 Jun;84(6):646–651. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-6-646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorn S. D., Williamson J. W. Statistical methods for reliability and validity testing: an application to nominal group judgments in health care. Med Care. 1977 Nov;15(11):922–928. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197711000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahne M. J. Suicides in mental hospitals: a study of the effects of personnel and patient turnover. J Health Soc Behav. 1968 Sep;9(3):255–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuhaus E., Lyons T. F., Payne B. C. Patient responses to request for written permission to review medical records. Am J Public Health. 1976 Nov;66(11):1090–1092. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.11.1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuhaus E., Lyons T. F., Payne B. C. Problems of case finding and data collection in ambulatory care settings. Am J Public Health. 1980 Mar;70(3):282–283. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.3.282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williamson J. W., Braswell H. R., Horn S. D., Lohmeyer S. Priority setting in quality assurance: reliability of staff judgments in medical institutions. Med Care. 1978 Nov;16(11):931–940. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197811000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williamson J. W., Braswell H. R., Horn S. D. Validity of medical staff judgments in establishing quality assurance priorities. Med Care. 1979 Apr;17(4):331–346. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197904000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williamson J. W. Formulating priorities for quality assurance activity. Description of a method and its application. JAMA. 1978 Feb 13;239(7):631–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]