Skip to main content
BMC Public Health logoLink to BMC Public Health
. 2023 Nov 29;23:2370. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17074-9

Common myths and misconceptions about breast cancer causation among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study

Mohamedraed Elshami 1,2,✉,#, Islam Osama Ismail 2,#, Mohammed Alser 3, Ibrahim Al-Slaibi 4, Roba Jamal Ghithan 5, Faten Darwish Usrof 6, Malak Ayman Mousa Qawasmi 7, Heba Mahmoud Okshiya 8, Nouran Ramzi Shaban Shurrab 5, Ibtisam Ismail Mahfouz 9, Aseel AbdulQader Fannon 9, Mona Radi Mohammad Hawa 10, Narmeen Giacaman 5, Manar Ahmaro 5, Rula Khader Zaatreh 11, Wafa Aqel AbuKhalil 5, Noor Khairi Melhim 12, Ruba Jamal Madbouh 5, Hala Jamal Abu Hziema 9, Raghad Abed-Allateef Lahlooh 5, Sara Nawaf Ubaiat 5, Nour Ali Jaffal 5, Reem Khaled Alawna 5, Salsabeel Naeem Abed 9, Bessan Nimer Ali Abuzahra 5, Aya Jawad Abu Kwaik 13, Mays Hafez Dodin 5, Raghad Othman Taha 5, Dina Mohammed Alashqar 9, Roaa Abd-al-Fattah Mobarak 5, Tasneem Smerat 14, Shurouq I Albarqi 15, Nasser Abu-El-Noor 16,#, Bettina Bottcher 9,#
PMCID: PMC10688078  PMID: 38031084

Abstract

Background

The discussion about breast cancer (BC) causation continues to be surrounded by a number of myths and misbeliefs. If efforts are misdirected towards reducing risk from false mythical causes, individuals might be less likely to consider and adopt risk-reducing behaviors for evidence-based BC causes. This national study aimed to assess the awareness of BC causation myths and misbeliefs among Palestinian women, and examine the factors associated with having good awareness.

Methods

This national cross-sectional study recruited adult women from government hospitals, primary healthcare centers, and public spaces in 11 governorates in Palestine. A modified version of the Cancer Awareness Measure-Mythical Causes Scale was used to collect data. The level of awareness of BC causation myths was determined based on the number of myths recognized to be incorrect: poor (0–5), fair (6–10), or good (11–15).

Results

A total of 5,257 questionnaires were included. Only 269 participants (5.1%) demonstrated good awareness (i.e., recognizing more than 10 out of 15 BC mythical causes). There were no notable differences in displaying good awareness between the main areas of Palestine, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank and Jerusalem (5.1% vs. 5.1%). Having chronic disease as well as visiting hospitals and primary healthcare centers were associated with a decrease in the likelihood of displaying good awareness.

Myths related to food were less frequently recognized as incorrect than food-unrelated myths. ‘Eating burnt food’ was the most recognized food-related myth (n = 1414, 26.9%), while ‘eating food containing additives’ was the least recognized (n = 599, 11.4%). ‘Having a physical trauma’ was the most recognized food-unrelated myth (n = 2795, 53.2%), whereas the least recognized was ‘wearing tight bra’ (n = 1018, 19.4%).

Conclusions

A very small proportion of Palestinian women could recognize 10 or more myths around BC causation. There is a substantial need to include clear information about BC causation in future educational interventions besides focusing on BC screening, signs and symptoms, and risk factors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-17074-9.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Causation, Causes, Myths, Misconceptions, Health promotion, Health education, Palestine

Background

Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. In 2020, The International Agency for Research on Cancer reported an estimated number of 2.26 million new BC cases, accounting for 24.5% of all female cancer cases, and about 684 thousand BC deaths, accounting for 15.5% of all female cancer-related deaths [1]. In Palestine, BC accounts for 35.6% of all reported female cancer cases, with estimated age-standardized incidence and mortality rates of 53.5 and 22.6 per 100,000 female population, respectively [2].

BC burden is heavier in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and its incidence is increasing due to higher trends for risk factors related to lifestyle modifications [3]. These factors include smoking, increased body mass index, physical inactivity, and changes in reproductive patterns (e.g., older age at first childbirth, fewer childbirths). Furthermore, BC mortality rates are higher in LMICs [3]. This could be attributed to diagnosis of BC at more advanced stages and difficulties in access to healthcare services [3, 4]. Primary prevention remains a cornerstone in mitigating BC burden [5]. Cancer awareness has been shown to be a major contributor to substantial improvement in cancer outcomes [6]. However, several studies demonstrated low awareness levels among Palestinian women about BC risk factors, symptoms, and screening methods [79].

Health beliefs are strong determinants of health behaviors [10], and accurate knowledge may play a key role in shaping protective health behaviors [11]. Around the world, the discussion about cancer causation, BC causation in particular, continues to be surrounded by a significant number of myths, such as stress, food additives, microwave ovens use, physical trauma, and exposure to electromagnetic frequencies [1214]. If efforts are misdirected towards reducing risk from false mythical cancer causes, individuals might be less likely to consider and adopt risk-reducing behaviors for evidence-based BC causes [12, 14].

Therefore, this national cross-sectional study aimed to assess the level of awareness of BC causation myths and misbeliefs among Palestinian women and to compare it between women from the two main areas of Palestine, the West Bank and Jerusalem (WBJ) and the Gaza Strip. In addition, it aimed to analyze factors associated with having good awareness level of BC mythical causes.

Methods

Study design and population

This was a national cross-sectional study conducted between July 2019 and March 2020. The target population was adult (≥ 18 years) Palestinian women. Participants were excluded if they were visitors or patients admitted to the oncology departments, had a background in health sciences, were healthcare workers, had nationalities other than the Palestinian, or were unable to complete the questionnaire.

Sampling size calculation

In 2019, the female population aging 15 years or older was 1,534,371 in Palestine [15]. With a confidence level of 95.0%, a type I error rate of 5.0% and an absolute error of 1.0%, the minimum sample size needed to detect a 10% good overall awareness of BC causation myths was 900 participants.

Sampling methods

The Palestinian Ministry of Health has 466 primary healthcare centers; among them, 26 are of the highest level (i.e., level IV), which provides all primary care services. Out of the 26 primary healthcare centers, 17 are located in the WBJ and nine are located in the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Ministry of Health also has 43 hospitals; 29 of them are in the West Bank and 14 are in the Gaza Strip. Of note, there are only 11 general hospitals with a bed capacity of more than 100: six in the West Bank and five in the Gaza Strip. There is no Ministry of Health hospital in Jerusalem. However, non-governmental organizations own three general hospitals with a bed capacity of more than 100 [16].

Convenience sampling was utilized to recruit women who fulfilled the eligibility criteria from 12 hospitals with bed capacity of more than 100, 11 level-four primary healthcare centers, and public spaces in 11 Palestinian governorates. These governorates included seven in the WBJ (Hebron, Nablus, Ramallah, Tulkarm, Bethlehem, Jenin, and Jerusalem) and four in the Gaza Strip (North of Gaza, Gaza, Middle Zone, and Khanyounis). Supplementary Table 1 summarizes the hospitals and primary healthcare centers included in this study. Public spaces included marketplaces, parks, malls, trade streets, mosques, transportation stations, and others. Recruiting participants from a variety of governorates and locations across Palestine was intended to increase the representativeness of the study cohort [8, 9, 1727].

Questionnaire and data collection

The Cancer Awareness Measure-Mythical Causes Scale (CAM-MYCS) [28] was adapted for the purpose of data collection. In a back-to-back translation, two bilingual healthcare experts, who were fluent in both English and Arabic, first translated the CAM-MYCS into Arabic and then two other bilingual healthcare experts back-translated it into English. All those healthcare experts had relevant expertise in BC, public health, and survey design. This was followed by assessing the questionnaire’s content validity by five independent healthcare professionals and researchers. A pilot study (n = 35) was then conducted to evaluate the clarity of the Arabic version of the questionnaire. The questionnaires of the pilot study were not included in the final analysis. Internal consistency was evaluated utilizing Cronbach’s Alpha, which reached an acceptable level of 0.74.

The questionnaire comprised two sections. The first section described the sociodemographic characteristics of participants, while the second section evaluated the prompt recognition of 15 myths around BC causation as being incorrect. Out of the 15 myths, 12 were adapted from the original CAM-MYCS. ‘Eating burnt food’, ‘using deodorant’ and ‘wearing tight bra’ were added as they were deemed important in the context of the Palestinian community. The original CAM-MYCS questions with correct/incorrect/unsure responses were changed into 5-point Likert scale questions (1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree"). This was done to reduce the potential of participants answering questions at random. Responses with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ were considered correct; all others were considered incorrect. The awareness of myths about BC causation was evaluated using a scoring system that was utilized in previous studies [8, 9, 1727]. The participant was given one point for each recognized myth to be incorrect. The total score was calculated and ranged from 0 to 15. The awareness level was determined based on the number of myths recognized to be incorrect: poor (0 to 5), fair (6 to 10), and good awareness (11 to 15).

Trained data collectors invited eligible participants to complete the questionnaire in a face-to-face interview. Data were collected using Kobo Toolbox, a reliable and user-friendly tool that can be utilized on smartphones [29].

Statistical analysis

Palestinian women are first invited to undergo BC screening at the age of 40 [30]. Therefore, this cutoff was utilized to dichotomize the continuous variable of age into two categories: 18–39 years and ≥ 40 years. In addition, the minimum wage in Palestine is 1450 NIS (about $450) [31], therefore, this cutoff was utilized to dichotomize the continuous variable of monthly income into two categories: < 1450 NIS and ≥ 1450 NIS.

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe categorical variables, while the median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to describe continuous variables with non-normal distribution. Kruskal–Wallis or Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare baseline characteristics of participants from the Gaza Strip versus those from the WBJ if they were continuous or categorical, respectively.

The assessed myths around BC causation were classified into food-related and food-unrelated myths. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe the recognition of each myth, and Pearson's Chi-square test was used to compare the recognition of participants from the Gaza Strip to that of those from the WBJ. Pearson’s Chi-square test was also used to compare the awareness level between participants from the Gaza Strip versus those from the WBJ.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to examine the association between participant characteristics and recognizing each myth around BC causation. The multivariable analyses adjusted for age-group, educational level, occupation, monthly income, marital status, place of residency, having a chronic disease, knowing someone with cancer, and site of data collection. This model was determined a priori based on previous studies [8, 9, 12, 14, 28, 3234].

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was also utilized to examine the association between participant characteristics and displaying good awareness of BC causation myths. The same aforementioned multivariable model was used.

Missing data were hypothesized to be missed completely at random and thus, complete case analysis was utilized to handle them. Data were analyzed using Stata software version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas Gaza, United States).

Results

Characteristics of participants

Out of 6269 potential participants approached, 5434 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 86.7%), and 5257 were included in the final analysis (164 had missing data and 13 did not match the inclusion criteria): 2551 were from the Gaza Strip and 2706 were from the WBJ. Participants from the WBJ were older, earned higher monthly income, and suffered from more frequent chronic illnesses than those from the Gaza Strip (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants

Characteristic Total
(n = 5257)
Gaza Strip
(n = 2551)
WBJ
(n = 2706)
p-value
Age, median [IQR] 31.0 [24.0, 43.0] 30.0 [24.0, 40.0] 33.0 [24.0, 45.0]  < 0.001
Age group, n (%)
 18 to 39 3615 (68.8) 1859 (72.9) 1756 (64.9)  < 0.001
 40 or older 1642 (31.2) 692 (27.1) 950 (35.1)
Educational level, n (%)
 Secondary or below 3030 (57.6) 1457 (57.1) 1573 (58.1) 0.46
 Post-secondary 2227 (42.4) 1094 (42.9) 1133 (41.9)
Occupation, n (%)
 Unemployed/housewife 3581 (68.1) 1873 (73.4) 1708 (63.1)  < 0.001
 Employed 1052 (20.0) 380 (14.9) 672 (24.9)
 Student 624 (11.9) 298 (11.7) 326 (12.0)
Monthly income ≥ 1450 NIS, n (%) 3055 (58.1) 716 (28.1) 2339 (86.4)  < 0.001
Having a chronic disease, n (%) 1058 (20.1) 397 (15.6) 661 (24.4)  < 0.001
Knowing someone with cancer, n (%) 2520 (47.9) 1083 (42.5) 1437 (53.1)  < 0.001
Marital status, n (%)
 Single 1301 (24.7) 626 (24.5) 675 (24.9)  < 0.001
 Married 3658 (69.6) 1812 (71.0) 1846 (68.2)
 Divorced/widowed 298 (5.7) 113 (4.5) 185 (6.9)
Site of data collection, n (%)
 Public spaces 1821 (34.6) 809 (31.7) 1012 (37.4)  < 0.001
 Hospitals 2116 (40.3) 919 (36.0) 1197 (44.2)
 Primary healthcare centers 1320 (25.1) 823 (32.3) 497 (18.4)

n number of participants, IQR interquartile range, WBJ West Bank and Jerusalem

Recognition of BC causation myths

Regarding myths related to food, there were fewer respondents who answered ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ than food-unrelated myths. ‘Eating burnt food’ was the most recognized food-related myth (n = 1414, 26.9%) followed by ‘drinking from plastic bottles’ (n = 1317, 25.1%) (Table 2). ‘Eating food containing additives’ was the least recognized food-related myth (n = 599, 11.4%). ‘Having a physical trauma’ was the most recognized food-unrelated myth (n = 2795, 53.2%), whereas the least recognized was ‘wearing tight bra’ (n = 1018, 19.4%).

Table 2.

Summary of the assessment of public beliefs in mythical causes of breast cancer

Mythical cause Total
(n = 5257)
n (%)
Gaza Strip
(n = 2551)
n (%)
WBJ
(n = 2706)
n (%)
p–value
Food-related myths
 Eating burnt food (e.g., bread or barbeque) 1414 (26.9) 525 (20.6) 889 (32.9)  < 0.001
 Drinking from plastic bottles 1317 (25.1) 680 (26.7) 637 (23.5) 0.009

 Eating food containing artificial sweeteners

(e.g., saccharine)

1106 (21.0) 576 (22.6) 530 (19.6) 0.008
 Using microwave ovens 837 (15.9) 388 (15.2) 449 (16.6) 0.17

 Eating genetically modified food

(e.g., hybrid vegetables)

707 (13.5) 355 (13.9) 352 (13.0) 0.33
 Eating food containing additives 599 (11.4) 275 (10.8) 324 (12.0) 0.17
Food-unrelated myths
 Having a physical trauma 2795 (53.2) 1311 (51.4) 1484 (54.8) 0.012
 Using aerosol containers 2070 (39.4) 961 (37.7) 1109 (41.0) 0.014
 Using cleaning products 1747 (33.2) 911 (35.7) 836 (30.9)  < 0.001
 Feeling stressed 1634 (31.1) 832 (32.6) 802 (29.6) 0.020

 Exposure to electromagnetic frequencies

(e.g., Wi-Fi and Radio/TV frequencies)

1450 (27.6) 663 (26.0) 787 (29.1) 0.012
 Living near power lines 1238 (23.6) 618 (24.2) 620 (22.9) 0.26
 Using deodorants 1222 (23.3) 571 (22.4) 651 (24.1) 0.15
 Using mobile phones 1115 (21.2) 542 (21.2) 573 (21.2) 0.95
 Wearing tight bra 1018 (19.4) 498 (19.5) 520 (19.2) 0.78

Answers with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ were considered correct; all other answers were considered incorrect

n number of participants, WBJ West Bank and Jerusalem

Good awareness of BC causation myths and its associated factors

Only 269 participants (5.1%) demonstrated good awareness of BC causation myths (i.e., responding with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ to more than 10 out of 15 BC mythical causes) (Table 3). Participants from both the WBJ and the Gaza Strip had similar likelihood to display good awareness (5.1% vs. 5.1%). On the multivariable analysis, having a chronic disease as well as visiting hospitals and primary healthcare centers were all associated with a decrease in the likelihood of displaying good awareness of BC causation myths (Table 4).

Table 3.

Awareness level of breast cancer mythical causes among study participants

Level Total
n (%)
Gaza Strip
n (%)
WBJ
n (%)
p–value
Poor (0–5 myths) 3771 (71.7) 1837 (72.0) 1934 (71.5) 0.88
Fair (6–10 myths) 1217 (23.2) 583 (22.9) 634 (23.4)
Good (11–15 myths) 269 (5.1) 131 (5.1) 138 (5.1)

Answers with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ were considered correct; all other answers were considered incorrect

n number of participants, WBJ West Bank and Jerusalem

Table 4.

Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyzing factors associated with having good recognition of the mythical causes of breast cancer

Characteristic Good recognition
No (N = 4988)
n (%)
Yes (N = 269)
n (%)
COR (95% CI) p-value AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 3410 (68.4) 205 (76.2) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 40 or older 1578 (31.6) 64 (23.8) 0.67 (0.51- 0.90) 0.007 0.78 (0.56- 1.10) 0.16
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2874 (57.6) 156 (58.0) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Post-secondary 2114 (42.4) 113 (42.0) 0.98 (0.77- 1.26) 0.90 0.79 (0.59- 1.06) 0.11
Occupation
 Housewife 3411 (68.4) 170 (63.2) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Employed 998 (20.0) 54 (20.1) 1.09 (0.79- 1.48) 0.61 0.98 (0.68- 1.40) 0.90
 Student 579 (11.6) 45 (16.7) 1.56 (1.11- 2.19) 0.01 1.11 (0.71- 1.73) 0.66
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 2081 (41.7) 121 (45.0) Ref Ref Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 2907 (58.3) 148 (55.0) 0.88 (0.68- 1.12) 0.29 0.79 (0.56- 1.09) 0.15
Marital status
 Single 1215 (24.4) 86 (32.0) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Married 3492 (70.0) 166 (61.7) 0.67 (0.51- 0.88) 0.004 0.89 (0.63- 1.27) 0.53
 Divorced/Widowed 281 (5.6) 17 (6.3) 0.85 (0.50- 1.46) 0.57 1.15 (0.64- 2.10) 0.64
Residency
 Gaza Strip 2420 (48.5) 131 (48.7) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 WBJ 2568 (51.5) 138 (51.3) 0.99 (0.78- 1.27) 0.95 1.16 (0.84- 1.60) 0.38
Having a chronic disease
 No 3966 (79.5) 233 (86.6) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 1022 (20.5) 36 (13.4) 0.60 (0.42- 0.86) 0.005 0.67 (0.45- 1.00) 0.050
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 2601 (52.1) 136 (50.6) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Yes 2387 (47.9) 133 (49.4) 1.07 (0.83- 1.36) 0.61 1.06 (0.82- 1.36) 0.65
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1687 (33.8) 134 (49.8) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Hospitals 2037 (40.8) 79 (29.4) 0.49 (0.37- 0.65)  < 0.001 0.52 (0.38- 0.70)  < 0.001
 Primary healthcare centers 1264 (25.4) 56 (20.8) 0.56 (0.40- 0.77)  < 0.001 0.57 (0.41- 0.81) 0.001

Answers with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ were considered correct; all other answers were considered incorrect

COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, WBJ West Bank and Jerusalem

aAdjusted for age-group, educational level, occupation, monthly income, marital status, residency, having a chronic disease, knowing someone with cancer, and site of data collection

Association between participant characteristics and recognizing food-related myths about BC causation

Participants recruited from hospitals or primary healthcare centers were less likely than those recruited from public spaces to recognize all BC food-related myths (Table 5). In addition, older participants (≥ 40 years) were less likely than younger participants to recognize all BC food-related myths except ‘eating food containing artificial sweeteners’ and ‘using microwave ovens,’ where no associated differences were found. Furthermore, participants who had chronic diseases were less likely than those who did not to recognize half of BC food-related myths. Education level was not associated with recognition of BC food-related myths except for ‘eating genetically modified food’ and ‘eating food containing additives’, where participants with higher education (i.e., post-secondary) were less likely to recognize them (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50–0.73 and OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.83, respectively).

Table 5.

Multivariable logistic regression analyzing factors associated with the recognition of each food-related mythical cause of breast cancer

Characteristic Eating burnt food Drinking from plastic bottles

No (N = 3843)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1414)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value

No (N = 3940)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1317)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 2557 (66.5) 1058 (74.8) Ref Ref 2638 (67.0) 977 (74.2) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1286 (33.5) 356 (25.2) 0.64 (0.55- 0.76)  < 0.001 1302 (33.0) 340 (25.8) 0.78 (0.66- 0.93) 0.005
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2258 (58.8) 772 (54.6) Ref Ref 2301 (58.4) 729 (55.4) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1585 (41.2) 642 (45.4) 0.96 (0.83- 1.11) 0.55 1639 (41.6) 588 (44.6) 0.98 (0.85- 1.14) 0.81
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 2698 (70.2) 883 (62.4) Ref Ref 2725 (69.2) 856 (65.0) Ref Ref
 Employed 740 (19.3) 312 (22.1) 1.01 (0.85- 1.21) 0.89 793 (20.1) 259 (19.7) 0.95 (0.79- 1.14) 0.55
 Student 405 (10.5) 219 (15.5) 1.17 (0.92- 1.48) 0.21 422 (10.7) 202 (15.3) 1.07 (0.84- 1.35) 0.60
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 1724 (44.9) 478 (33.8) Ref Ref 1614 (41.0) 588 (44.6) Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 2119 (55.1) 936 (66.2) 1.08 (0.92- 1.28) 0.35 2326 (59.0) 729 (55.4) 0.88 (0.74- 1.04) 0.13
Marital status
 Single 880 (22.9) 421 (29.8) Ref Ref 899 (22.8) 402 (30.5) Ref Ref
 Married 2750 (71.6) 908 (64.2) 0.95 (0.79- 1.14) 0.56 2815 (71.4) 843 (64.0) 0.83 (0.69- 0.99) 0.041
 Divorced/Widowed 213 (5.5) 85 (6.0) 1.18 (0.86- 1.61) 0.30 226 (5.8) 72 (5.5) 0.92 (0.66- 1.26) 0.59
Residency
 Gaza Strip 2026 (52.7) 525 (37.1) Ref Ref 1871 (47.5) 680 (51.6) Ref Ref
 WBJ 1817 (47.3) 889 (62.9) 1.76 (1.49- 2.07)  < 0.001 2069 (52.5) 637 (48.4) 0.91 (0.78- 1.07) 0.27
Having a chronic disease
 No 3042 (79.2) 1157 (81.8) Ref Ref 3113 (79.0) 1086 (82.5) Ref Ref
 Yes 801 (20.8) 257 (18.2) 0.99 (0.82- 1.18) 0.88 827 (21.0) 231 (17.5) 0.98 (0.82- 1.18) 0.85
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 2039 (53.1) 698 (49.4) Ref Ref 2026 (51.4) 711 (54.0) Ref Ref
 Yes 1804 (46.9) 716 (50.6) 1.07 (0.94- 1.21) 0.30 1914 (48.6) 606 (46.0) 0.91 (0.80- 1.03) 0.14
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1209 (31.5) 612 (43.3) Ref Ref 1264 (32.1) 557 (42.3) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1569 (40.8) 547 (38.7) 0.76 (0.65- 0.88)  < 0.001 1647 (41.8) 469 (35.6) 0.70 (0.60- 0.81)  < 0.001
 Primary healthcare centers 1065 (27.7) 255 (18.0) 0.55 (0.46- 0.66)  < 0.001 1029 (26.1) 291 (22.1) 0.65 (0.54- 0.77)  < 0.001
Characteristic Eating food containing artificial sweeteners Using microwave ovens

No (N = 4151)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1106)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value

No (N = 4420)

n (%)

Yes (N = 837)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 2823 (68.0) 792 (71.6) Ref Ref 2997 (67.8) 618 (73.8) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1328 (32.0) 314 (28.4) 0.90 (0.76- 1.08) 0.26 1423 (32.2) 219 (26.2) 0.85 (0.70- 1.04) 0.11
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2380 (57.3) 650 (58.8) Ref Ref 2570 (58.1) 460 (55.0) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1771 (42.7) 456 (41.2) 0.85 (0.72- 1.00) 0.06 1850 (41.9) 377 (45.0) 0.97 (0.81- 1.16) 0.73
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 2846 (68.6) 735 (66.5) Ref Ref 3058 (69.2) 523 (62.5) Ref Ref
 Employed 852 (20.5) 200 (18.1) 0.89 (0.73- 1.09) 0.25 863 (19.5) 189 (22.6) 1.14 (0.92- 1.41) 0.24
 Student 453 (10.9) 171 (15.4) 1.31 (1.01- 1.69) 0.041 499 (11.3) 125 (14.9) 1.00 (0.76- 1.33) 0.98
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 1702 (41.0) 500 (45.2) Ref Ref 1845 (41.7) 357 (42.7) Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 2449 (59.0) 606 (54.8) 0.93 (0.78- 1.11) 0.44 2575 (58.3) 480 (57.3) 0.79 (0.65- 0.97) 0.024
Marital status
 Single 997 (24.0) 304 (27.5) Ref Ref 1037 (23.5) 264 (31.5) Ref Ref
 Married 2928 (70.5) 730 (66.0) 1.09 (0.90- 1.34) 0.38 3130 (70.8) 528 (63.1) 0.83 (0.67- 1.03) 0.09
 Divorced/Widowed 226 (5.5) 72 (6.5) 1.43 (1.02- 2.00) 0.036 253 (5.7) 45 (5.4) 0.84 (0.58- 1.23) 0.37
Residency
 Gaza Strip 1975 (47.6) 576 (52.1) Ref Ref 2163 (48.9) 388 (46.4) Ref Ref
 WBJ 2176 (52.4) 530 (47.9) 0.83 (0.70- 0.99) 0.034 2257 (51.1) 449 (53.6) 1.24 (1.02- 1.50) 0.030
Having a chronic disease
 No 3280 (79.0) 919 (83.1) Ref Ref 3500 (79.2) 699 (83.5) Ref Ref
 Yes 871 (21.0) 187 (16.9) 0.79 (0.65- 0.96) 0.020 920 (20.8) 138 (16.5) 0.85 (0.68- 1.07) 0.16
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 2154 (51.9) 583 (52.7) Ref Ref 2265 (51.2) 472 (56.4) Ref Ref
 Yes 1997 (48.1) 523 (47.3) 0.95 (0.83- 1.09) 0.45 2155 (48.8) 365 (43.6) 0.77 (0.66- 0.90) 0.001
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1334 (32.1) 487 (44.0) Ref Ref 1445 (32.7) 376 (44.9) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1687 (40.6) 429 (38.8) 0.70 (0.60 -0.82)  < 0.001 1804 (40.8) 312 (37.3) 0.71 (0.59- 0.85)  < 0.001
 Primary healthcare centers 1130 (27.3) 190 (17.2) 0.43 (0.35- 0.52)  < 0.001 1171 (26.5) 149 (17.8) 0.51 (0.41- 0.63)  < 0.001
Characteristic Eating genetically modified food Eating food containing additives

No (N = 4550)

n (%)

Yes (N = 707)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value

No (N = 4658)

n (%)

Yes (N = 599)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 3065 (67.4) 550 (77.8) Ref Ref 3143 (67.5) 472 (78.8) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1485 (32.6) 157 (22.2) 0.58 (0.47- 0.73)  < 0.001 1515 (32.5) 127 (21.2) 0.59 (0.47- 0.76)  < 0.001
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2588 (56.9) 442 (62.5) Ref Ref 2664 (57.2) 366 (61.1) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1962 (43.1) 265 (37.5) 0.61 (0.50- 0.73)  < 0.001 1994 (42.8) 233 (38.9) 0.67 (0.55- 0.83)  < 0.001
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 3121 (68.6) 460 (65.1) Ref Ref 3178 (68.2) 403 (67.3) Ref Ref
 Employed 917 (20.2) 135 (19.1) 1.06 (0.83- 1.34) 0.66 950 (20.4) 102 (17.0) 0.73 (0.56- 0.95) 0.018
 Student 512 (11.2) 112 (15.8) 1.19 (0.88- 1.60) 0.27 530 (11.4) 94 (15.7) 0.79 (0.57- 1.08) 0.13
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 1870 (41.1) 332 (47.0) Ref Ref 1949 (41.8) 253 (42.2) Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 2680 (58.9) 375 (53.0) 0.77 (0.62- 0.95) 0.016 2709 (58.2) 346 (57.8) 0.93 (0.74- 1.17) 0.53
Marital status
 Single 1087 (23.9) 214 (30.3) Ref Ref 1094 (23.5) 207 (34.6) Ref Ref
 Married 3206 (70.5) 452 (63.9) 0.98 (0.78- 1.23) 0.85 3299 (70.8) 359 (59.9) 0.60 (0.47- 0.76)  < 0.001
 Divorced/Widowed 257 (5.6) 41 (5.8) 1.15 (0.77- 1.73) 0.49 265 (5.7) 33 (5.5) 0.81 (0.52- 1.25) 0.33
Residency
 Gaza Strip 2196 (48.3) 355 (50.2) Ref Ref 2276 (48.9) 275 (45.9) Ref Ref
 WBJ 2354 (51.7) 352 (49.8) 1.05 (0.85- 1.29) 0.67 2382 (51.1) 324 (54.1) 1.22 (0.97- 1.52) 0.09
Having a chronic disease
 No 3596 (79.0) 603 (85.3) Ref Ref 3685 (79.1) 514 (85.8) Ref Ref
 Yes 954 (21.0) 104 (14.7) 0.78 (0.61- 1.00) 0.049 973 (20.9) 85 (14.2) 0.75 (0.57- 0.98) 0.038
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 2363 (51.9) 374 (52.9) Ref Ref 2420 (52.0) 317 (52.9) Ref Ref
 Yes 2187 (48.1) 333 (47.1) 0.95 (0.81- 1.12) 0.54 2238 (48.0) 282 (47.1) 0.98 (0.82- 1.17) 0.80
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1481 (32.5) 340 (48.1) Ref Ref 1556 (33.4) 265 (44.2) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1860 (40.9) 256 (36.2) 0.60 (0.50- 0.73)  < 0.001 1891 (40.6) 225 (37.6) 0.75 (0.61- 0.92) 0.005
 Primary healthcare centers 1209 (26.6) 111 (15.7) 0.38 (0.30- 0.48)  < 0.001 1211 (26.0) 109 (18.2) 0.55 (0.43- 0.71)  < 0.001

Answers with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ were considered correct; all other answers were considered incorrect

AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, WBJ West Bank and Jerusalem

aAdjusted for age-group, educational level, occupation, monthly income, marital status, residency, having a chronic disease, knowing someone with cancer, and site of data collection

Association between participant characteristics and recognizing food-unrelated myths about BC causation

Participants recruited from hospitals or primary healthcare centers were less likely than those recruited from public spaces to recognize eight out of nine food-unrelated myths as incorrect (Table 6). In contrast, employed participants were less likely than the unemployed/housewives to recognize five out of nine BC food-unrelated myths. In addition, participants with higher education were less likely to recognize ‘using cleaning products’ (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74–0.97), ‘exposure to electromagnetic frequencies’ (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98), and ‘wearing tight bra’ (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56–0.81) and had similar likelihoods to recognize five out of nine BC food-unrelated myths as compared to participants with lower education.

Table 6.

Multivariable logistic regression analyzing factors associated with the recognition of each food-unrelated mythical cause of breast cancer

Characteristic Having a physical trauma Using aerosol containers

No (N = 2462)

n (%)

Yes (N = 2795)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value

No (N = 3187)

n (%)

Yes (N = 2070)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 1653 (67.1) 1962 (70.2) Ref Ref 2105 (66.0) 1510 (72.9) Ref Ref
 40 or older 809 (32.9) 833 (29.8) 0.90 (0.78- 1.03) 0.14 1082 (34.0) 560 (27.1) 0.73 (0.63- 0.84)  < 0.001
Educational level
 Secondary or below 1480 (60.1) 1550 (55.5) Ref Ref 1861 (58.4) 1169 (56.5) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 982 (39.9) 1245 (44.5) 1.23 (1.08- 1.41) 0.002 1326 (41.6) 901 (43.5) 0.92 (0.80- 1.05) 0.20
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 1671 (67.9) 1910 (68.3) Ref Ref 2202 (69.1) 1379 (66.6) Ref Ref
 Employed 496 (20.1) 556 (19.9) 0.84 (0.71- 0.98) 0.028 635 (19.9) 417 (20.1) 0.84 (0.71- 0.99) 0.038
 Student 295 (12.0) 329 (11.8) 0.88 (0.71- 1.10) 0.26 350 (11.0) 274 (13.3) 0.77 (0.62- 0.96) 0.023
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 1087 (44.2) 1115 (39.9) Ref Ref 1398 (43.9) 804 (38.8) Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 1375 (55.8) 1680 (60.1) 1.09 (0.95- 1.26) 0.22 1789 (56.1) 1266 (61.2) 1.23 (1.06- 1.43) 0.007
Marital status
 Single 627 (25.5) 674 (24.1) Ref Ref 709 (22.2) 592 (28.6) Ref Ref
 Married 1685 (68.4) 1973 (70.6) 1.20 (1.02- 1.42) 0.025 2292 (71.9) 1366 (66.0) 0.81 (0.69- 0.96) 0.013
 Divorced/Widowed 150 (6.1) 148 (5.3) 1.09 (0.83- 1.44) 0.54 186 (5.9) 112 (5.4) 0.88 (0.66- 1.18) 0.39
Residency
 Gaza Strip 1240 (50.4) 1311 (46.9) Ref Ref 1590 (49.9) 961 (46.4) Ref Ref
 WBJ 1222 (49.6) 1484 (53.1) 1.12 (0.98- 1.29) 0.10 1597 (50.1) 1109 (53.6) 1.02 (0.88- 1.17) 0.83
Having a chronic disease
 No 1938 (78.7) 2261 (80.9) Ref Ref 2515 (78.9) 1684 (81.4) Ref Ref
 Yes 524 (21.3) 534 (19.1) 0.92 (0.79- 1.08) 0.32 672 (21.1) 386 (18.6) 1.02 (0.86- 1.19) 0.86
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 1314 (53.4) 1423 (50.9) Ref Ref 1663 (52.2) 1074 (51.9) Ref Ref
 Yes 1148 (46.6) 1372 (49.1) 1.08 (0.97- 1.21) 0.16 1524 (47.8) 996 (48.1) 0.96 (0.86- 1.08) 0.54
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 813 (33.0) 1008 (36.1) Ref Ref 952 (29.9) 869 (42.0) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1028 (41.8) 1088 (38.9) 0.84 (0.73- 0.96) 0.009 1349 (42.3) 767 (37.0) 0.64 (0.55- 0.73)  < 0.001
 Primary healthcare centers 621 (25.2) 699 (25.0) 0.89 (0.76- 1.03) 0.12 886 (27.8) 434 (21.0) 0.54 (0.46- 0.63)  < 0.001
Characteristic Using cleaning products Feeling stressed

No (N = 3510)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1747)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value

No (N = 3623)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1634)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 2324 (66.2) 1291 (73.9) Ref Ref 2479 (68.4) 1136 (69.5) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1186 (33.8) 456 (26.1) 0.66 (0.57- 0.77)  < 0.001 1144 (31.6) 498 (30.5) 0.96 (0.82- 1.11) 0.57
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2013 (57.4) 1017 (58.2) Ref Ref 2058 (56.8) 972 (59.5) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1497 (42.6) 730 (41.8) 0.85 (0.74- 0.97) 0.017 1565 (43.2) 662 (40.5) 0.88 (0.77- 1.01) 0.08
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 2377 (67.7) 1204 (68.9) Ref Ref 2445 (67.5) 1136 (69.5) Ref Ref
 Employed 705 (20.1) 347 (19.9) 0.95 (0.80- 1.12) 0.51 757 (20.9) 295 (18.1) 0.83 (0.70- 0.99) 0.037
 Student 428 (12.2) 196 (11.2) 0.70 (0.56- 0.88) 0.003 421 (11.6) 203 (12.4) 0.99 (0.79- 1.26) 0.96
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 1447 (41.2) 755 (43.2) Ref Ref 1493 (41.2) 709 (43.4) Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 2063 (58.8) 992 (56.8) 1.11 (0.95- 1.30) 0.18 2130 (58.8) 925 (56.6) 1.06 (0.90- 1.23) 0.50
Marital status
 Single 847 (24.1) 454 (26.0) Ref Ref 902 (24.9) 399 (24.4) Ref Ref
 Married 2451 (69.8) 1207 (69.1) 0.95 (0.80- 1.12) 0.53 2518 (69.5) 1140 (69.8) 1.15 (0.96- 1.37) 0.13
 Divorced/Widowed 212 (6.1) 86 (4.9) 0.88 (0.65- 1.20) 0.43 203 (5.6) 95 (5.8) 1.22 (0.90- 1.65) 0.19
Residency
 Gaza Strip 1640 (46.7) 911 (52.1) Ref Ref 1719 (47.4) 832 (50.9) Ref Ref
 WBJ 1870 (53.3) 836 (47.9) 0.76 (0.66- 0.88)  < 0.001 1904 (52.6) 802 (49.1) 0.83 (0.71- 0.96) 0.015
Having a chronic disease
 No 2771 (78.9) 1428 (81.7) Ref Ref 2872 (79.3) 1327 (81.2) Ref Ref
 Yes 739 (21.1) 319 (18.3) 1.03 (0.87- 1.21) 0.76 751 (20.7) 307 (18.8) 0.88 (0.74- 1.04) 0.13
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 1831 (52.2) 906 (51.9) Ref Ref 1872 (51.7) 865 (52.9) Ref Ref
 Yes 1679 (47.8) 841 (48.1) 1.03 (0.91- 1.15) 0.68 1751 (48.3) 769 (47.1) 0.93 (0.83- 1.05) 0.24
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1143 (32.6) 678 (38.8) Ref Ref 1173 (32.4) 648 (39.7) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1462 (41.7) 654 (37.4) 0.73 (0.64- 0.85)  < 0.001 1471 (40.6) 645 (39.5) 0.74 (0.64- 0.85)  < 0.001
 Primary healthcare centers 905 (25.7) 415 (23.8) 0.70 (0.60- 0.82)  < 0.001 979 (27.0) 341 (20.8) 0.56 (0.47- 0.66)  < 0.001
Characteristic Exposure to electromagnetic frequencies Living near power lines

No (N = 3807)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1450)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value

No (N = 4019)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1238)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)a p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 2626 (69.0) 989 (68.2) Ref Ref 2720 (67.7) 895 (72.3) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1181 (31.0) 461 (31.8) 0.95 (0.81- 1.11) 0.51 1299 (32.3) 343 (27.7) 0.86 (0.73- 1.02) 0.09
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2136 (56.1) 894 (61.7) Ref Ref 2336 (58.1) 694 (56.1) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1671 (43.9) 556 (38.3) 0.85 (0.73- 0.98) 0.026 1683 (41.9) 544 (43.9) 1.02 (0.88–1.19) 0.76
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 2536 (66.6) 1045 (72.1) Ref Ref 2746 (68.3) 835 (67.4) Ref Ref
 Employed 796 (20.9) 256 (17.7) 0.78 (0.65- 0.94) 0.009 816 (20.3) 236 (19.1) 0.88 (0.73- 1.06) 0.17
 Student 475 (12.5) 149 (10.2) 0.74 (0.58- 0.95) 0.019 457 (11.4) 167 (13.5) 0.96 (0.75- 1.24) 0.77
Monthly income
  < 1450 NIS 1605 (42.2) 597 (41.2) Ref Ref 1677 (41.7) 525 (42.4) Ref Ref
  ≥ 1450 NIS 2202 (57.8) 853 (58.8) 1.02 (0.87- 1.20) 0.83 2342 (58.3) 713 (57.6) 1.00 (0.84- 1.18) 0.96
Marital status
 Single 963 (25.3) 338 (23.3) Ref Ref 962 (23.9) 339 (27.4) Ref Ref
 Married 2621 (68.8) 1037 (71.5) 0.99 (0.82- 1.19) 0.90 2813 (70.0) 845 (68.3) 0.96 (0.80- 1.16) 0.69
 Divorced/Widowed 223 (5.9) 75 (5.2) 0.84 (0.61- 1.15) 0.28 244 (6.1) 54 (4.4) 0.74 (0.52- 1.05) 0.09
Residency
 Gaza Strip 1888 (49.6) 663 (45.7) Ref Ref 1933 (48.1) 618 (49.9) Ref Ref
 WBJ 1919 (50.4) 787 (54.3) 1.15 (0.98- 1.35) 0.08 2086 (51.9) 620 (50.1) 0.93 (0.79- 1.10) 0.41
Having a chronic disease
 No 3048 (80.1) 1151 (79.4) Ref Ref 3187 (79.3) 1012 (81.7) Ref Ref
 Yes 759 (19.9) 299 (20.6) 0.97 (0.81- 1.15) 0.69 832 (20.7) 226 (18.3) 0.97 (0.80- 1.17) 0.74
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 1993 (52.4) 744 (51.3) Ref Ref 2084 (51.9) 653 (52.7) Ref Ref
 Yes 1814 (47.6) 706 (48.7) 1.02 (0.90- 1.15) 0.78 1935 (48.1) 585 (47.3) 0.96 (0.84- 1.09) 0.54
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1307 (34.3) 514 (35.4) Ref Ref 1332 (33.1) 489 (39.5) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1495 (39.3) 621 (42.8) 0.95 (0.82- 1.10) 0.52 1637 (40.7) 479 (38.7) 0.81 (0.69- 0.94) 0.007
 Primary healthcare centers 1005 (26.4) 315 (21.8) 0.74 (0.63- 0.88) 0.001 1050 (26.2) 270 (21.8) 0.68 (0.57- 0.81)  < 0.001
Characteristic Using deodorants Using mobile phones

No (N = 4035)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1222)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)* p-value

No (N = 4142)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1115)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)* p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 2758 (68.4) 857 (70.1) Ref Ref 2763 (66.7) 852 (76.4) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1277 (31.6) 365 (29.9) 0.91 (0.77- 1.08) 0.27 1379 (33.3) 263 (23.6) 0.75 (0.62- 0.90) 0.002
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2312 (57.3) 718 (58.8) Ref Ref 2451 (59.2) 579 (51.9) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1723 (42.7) 504 (41.2) 0.89 (0.76- 1.03) 0.13 1691 (40.8) 536 (48.1) 0.97 (0.83- 1.14) 0.74
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 2753 (68.2) 828 (67.8) Ref Ref 2918 (70.4) 663 (59.5) Ref Ref
 Employed 820 (20.4) 232 (19.0) 0.87 (0.72- 1.05) 0.14 790 (19.1) 262 (23.5) 1.19 (0.98- 1.44) 0.07
 Student 462 (11.4) 162 (13.2) 0.92 (0.71- 1.18) 0.50 434 (10.5) 190 (17.0) 1.12 (0.87- 1.43) 0.38
Monthly income
 < 1450 NIS 1701 (42.2) 501 (41.0) Ref Ref 1761 (42.5) 441 (39.6) Ref Ref
 ≥ 1450 NIS 2334 (57.8) 721 (59.0) 1.01 (0.85- 1.20) 0.88 2381 (57.5) 674 (60.4) 1.07 (0.89- 1.27) 0.48
Marital status
 Single 958 (23.7) 343 (28.1) Ref Ref 916 (22.1) 385 (34.5) Ref Ref
 Married 2843 (70.5) 815 (66.7) 0.82 (0.68- 0.98) 0.034 2982 (72.0) 676 (60.6) 0.74 (0.61- 0.89) 0.001
 Divorced/Widowed 234 (5.8) 64 (5.2) 0.76 (0.54- 1.05) 0.10 244 (5.9) 54 (4.9) 0.75 (0.53- 1.06) 0.11
Residency
 Gaza Strip 1980 (49.1) 571 (46.7) Ref Ref 2009 (48.5) 542 (48.6) Ref Ref
 WBJ 2055 (50.9) 651 (53.3) 1.07 (0.91- 1.27) 0.41 2133 (51.5) 573 (51.4) 0.96 (0.81- 1.14) 0.67
Having a chronic disease
 No 3229 (80.0) 970 (79.4) Ref Ref 3265 (78.8) 934 (83.8) Ref Ref
 Yes 806 (20.0) 252 (20.6) 1.09 (0.91- 1.31) 0.33 877 (21.2) 181 (16.2) 0.98 (0.80- 1.20) 0.87
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 2117 (52.5) 620 (50.7) Ref Ref 2135 (51.5) 602 (54.0) Ref Ref
 Yes 1918 (47.5) 602 (49.3) 1.05 (0.92- 1.19) 0.49 2007 (48.5) 513 (46.0) 0.89 (0.77- 1.02) 0.09
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1335 (33.1) 486 (39.8) Ref Ref 1308 (31.6) 513 (46.0) Ref Ref
 Hospitals 1647 (40.8) 469 (38.4) 0.79 (0.67- 0.92) 0.003 1774 (42.8) 342 (30.7) 0.58 (0.49- 0.68) <0.001
 Primary healthcare centers 1053 (26.1) 267 (21.8) 0.72 (0.60- 0.86) <0.001 1060 (25.6) 260 (23.3) 0.70 (0.58- 0.84) <0.001
Characteristic Wearing tight bra

No (N = 4239)

n (%)

Yes (N = 1018)

n (%)

AOR (95% CI)* p-value
Age group
 18 to 39 2884 (68.0) 731 (71.8) Ref Ref
 40 or older 1355 (32.0) 287 (28.2) 0.85 (0.71- 1.02) 0.08
Educational level
 Secondary or below 2384 (56.2) 646 (63.5) Ref Ref
 Post–secondary 1855 (43.8) 372 (36.5) 0.68 (0.56- 0.81) <0.001
Occupation
 Unemployed/housewife 2867 (67.6) 714 (70.1) Ref Ref
 Employed 882 (20.8) 170 (16.7) 0.80 (0.65- 0.99) 0.042
 Student 490 (11.6) 134 (13.2) 0.92 (0.71- 1.21) 0.57
Monthly income
 < 1450 NIS 1742 (41.1) 460 (45.2) Ref Ref
 ≥ 1450 NIS 2497 (58.9) 558 (54.8) 0.86 (0.71- 1.03) 0.10
Marital status
 Single 1024 (24.2) 277 (27.2) Ref Ref
 Married 2972 (70.1) 686 (67.4) 0.88 (0.72- 1.08) 0.22
 Divorced/Widowed 243 (5.7) 55 (5.4) 0.88 (0.62- 1.26) 0.49
Residency
 Gaza Strip 2053 (48.4) 498 (48.9) Ref Ref
 WBJ 2186 (51.6) 520 (51.1) 1.09 (0.91- 1.30) 0.36
Having a chronic disease
 No 3356 (79.2)  843 (82.8)  Ref  Ref 
 Yes 883 (20.8) 175 (17.2)  0.79 (0.64- 0.97) 0.022
Knowing someone with cancer
 No 2196 (51.8) 541 (53.1) Ref Ref
 Yes 2043 (48.2) 477 (46.9) 0.95 (0.82- 1.09) 0.48
Site of data collection
 Public Spaces 1403 (33.1) 418 (41.1)  Ref  Ref 
 Hospitals 1725 (40.7)  391 (38.4)  0.72 (0.61- 0.85)  <0.001 
 Primary healthcare centers 1111 (26.2) 209 (20.5) 0.59 (0.48- 0.72) <0.001

Answers with ‘disagree’ or ‘strongly disagree’ were considered correct; all other answers were considered incorrect

AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, WBJ West Bank and Jerusalem

aAdjusted for age-group, educational level, occupation, monthly income, marital status, residency, having a chronic disease, knowing someone with cancer, and site of data collection

Discussion

In this study, the overall awareness of BC causation myths was very low with only about 5% displaying good awareness (i.e., recognition of more than 10 out of 15 BC causation myths to be incorrect). There were no notable differences in awareness levels between the Gaza Strip and the WBJ. Participants with chronic diseases as well as visitors to hospitals or primary healthcare centers had a lower likelihood of displaying good awareness. Myths related to food were generally less recognized than food-unrelated myths. The most recognized food-related myths were ‘eating burnt food’ and ‘drinking from plastic bottles’, while the least recognized was ‘eating food containing additives. The most recognized food-unrelated myth was ‘having a physical trauma’, whereas the least recognized was ‘wearing tight bra’.

More than 60% of BC cases in Palestine are diagnosed at advanced stages despite the efforts of the Palestinian Ministry of Health and other organizations to improve early diagnosis and treatment [35]. Niksic and colleagues found out that low cancer awareness was associated with poor cancer survival [6]. Previous national studies from Palestine found that only 41.7% and 38.4% of Palestinian women displayed good BC symptom and risk factor awareness, respectively [8, 9]. The current study assessed the level of recognition of BC causation myths and misconceptions among Palestinian women since health beliefs may shape individuals’ health behavior [10]. Active endorsement of myths instead of established risk factors may cause confusion for the public and may negatively impact their health behavior [14], hindering the efforts to mitigate cancer burden.

This study shows poor recognition of BC myths, which aligns with previous studies [10, 14, 28]. In the present study, 80.6% and 46.8% believed that wearing a tight bra and having a physical trauma could increase the risk for developing BC, respectively. Ryan and colleagues surveyed 748 Irish participants and found a lower proportion (29%) believing of wearing a tight bra as a BC risk factor but a similar proportion (48%) thinking so of a blow to the breast [10]. In addition, the authors found a high proportion of participants (86%) who believed that using mobile phones strongly increases the risk of cancer [10], similar to this study (78.8%). Moreover, Palestinian women could recognize the myths as incorrect causes of BC less than the actual risk factors of BC [8], similar to the results of a previous study that demonstrated the difficulty to distinguish the actual causes of cancer from mythical causes as a result of misinformation on the news and social networks [32].

Food related myths were less recognized as false causes of BC in this study. The relationship between diet and cancer is well-established. About one-third of cancer deaths could be attributed to diet and lifestyle [36], and 30 to 50% of all cancer cases are estimated to be preventable through healthy choices such as avoiding tobacco coupled with healthy diet and maintaining a normal body weight [37]. The Third Expert Report from the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) suggested that low intake of fruits and vegetables, high consumption of alcohol, and red processed meat are associated with increased cancer risk [37, 38]. National studies from Palestine found that 46.0% and 62.6% of participants recognized that being overweight and consuming fatty food could be risk factors for BC, respectively [8], and 42.9% and 53.4% recognized consuming red meat once or more per day and having a diet low in fibers as risk factors for colorectal cancer [22]. While in the present study, 88.6% and 86.5% of respondents believed that eating food containing additives and genetically modified food could increase BC risk. The discrepancy between the level of awareness of actual and mythical dietary factors can be problematic because dietary choices can affect health and the likelihood of developing BC [38].

At a time when the internet and social networks are considered a major source of health information, which is sometimes incorrect, the public now has access to information more easily than ever, and as a largely unregulated source for health information, myths about BC are still being replicated [39, 40]. According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, 79.6% of the public in Palestine had internet access, 86.2% used social media, and 55.0% used the internet to seek health information in 2019 [41]. A previous study from Saudi Arabia found that 93.9% of the participants used at least one platform of social media to obtain health information, and 50.0% believed that the obtained health information from social media was reliable [42]. Johnson and colleagues reviewed 200 of the most popular social media articles about four of the most common cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate) posted on Facebook and other social networks, and they found that nearly one third of those articles contained misinformation, and 76.9% contained harmful information. The authors also found that engagement for articles with misinformation was greater than evidence-based articles [43]. Misinformation is thought to spread faster than true information because their content is usually novel and elicits more disgust, fear, or surprise [44]. The official website for the Palestinian Ministry of Health focuses on BC screening programs, early detection, signs and symptoms, and risk factors with no clear information addressing BC myths and misinformation [45]. Therefore, it is critical to make evidence-based information about BC causation available to Palestinian women with clear, evidence-based advice on how to reduce personal risks of BC. Such information may contribute to the efforts of women to make healthy lifestyle choices and prevent them from diverting their efforts to non-evidence-based interventions [46].

Surprisingly, in this study, visiting hospitals and primary healthcare centers was associated with lower likelihood of displaying good awareness as well as recognizing all BC causation myths. This contradicts with a previous study from Palestine that found that visiting governmental hospitals and primary healthcare centers was associated with an increase in likelihood of recognizing BC risk factors [8]. Higher education level and employment were also not associated with improved recognition of most BC myths. This was another unexpected finding, as postsecondary education was found to be associated with an increase in the likelihood of displaying good awareness of BC risk factors [8]. Health literacy is a distinct concept from literacy in general [47]. While the latter refers to being well-educated [47], health literacy specifically relates to an individual's ability to obtain, communicate, process, and understand basic health information and services necessary for making informed health decisions [48]. However, education is not the only factor that determines an individual's health literacy. Culture and society, the health system, and education are all crucial components of health literacy. These domains provide opportunities for intervention and improvement in health literacy, but they also present challenges [49]. Therefore, efforts to enhance health literacy, and hence health behavior, must consider the broader social and cultural contexts in which individuals live and access health information and services.

Additionally, we found that participants with chronic diseases were less likely to display good level of recognition of BC causation myths compared to those without such conditions. A previous national study from Palestine found that having a chronic disease was not associated with good awareness of BC risk factors [8]. Another previous study also demonstrated that participants with no chronic diseases held significantly more positive beliefs about cancer than those with poor/fair health [50]. These observations are especially important because many previous studies have shown that women with BC were more likely to die from cancer as well as all-cause mortality if they had other comorbidities [5153], and that individuals who rated their health as fair or poor were more likely to have barriers to seeking healthcare [54]. This, combined with the negative association between low BC awareness and BC risk [55], can add to the cancer burden in this subgroup [53].

Future directions

In the presence of low uptake of BC screening programs in Palestine [8], cancer prevention through public education on BC risk-reduction strategies and mitigating the stigma and myths surrounding the disease are essential for BC control. In fact, health promotion and early detection are the first pillar of the World Health Organization's Global Breast Cancer Initiative [56]. Despite numerous BC awareness campaigns in Palestine, there is a substantial need to promote Palestinian women’s knowledge about BC causation myths utilizing more innovative and culturally tailored methods. In addition, training healthcare professionals on how to educate women to be able to distinguish between evidence-based versus mythical BC causes is warranted [32]. Moreover, more information about BC mythical causes should be available to the Palestinian public through reliable websites such as the website of the Ministry of Health. Finally, university and school curricula should be enriched with more materials about well-established BC risk factors.

Strengths and limitations

The main strengths of this study include the large sample size, the high response rate, and the wide coverage of the Palestinian community. This study has some limitations though. The exclusion of patients or visitors to oncology departments and those with medical backgrounds may have resulted in a smaller number of participants with higher awareness. Nevertheless, their exclusion was intended to ensure that the study accurately evaluated the public awareness of BC causation myths. A further limitation could be the use of convenience sampling that does not guarantee the generalizability of the study findings. Nonetheless, the high response rate coupled with the large sample size and the recruitment from various geographic locations may have mitigated this limitation. Moreover, our study did not capture data on some BC risk factors (e.g., smoking, high body mass index, older age at first childbirth..etc.) and assessing the awareness of BC causation myths in sub-groups based on these factors could be of interest. However, the primary scope of our study was to assess the overall public awareness of BC causation myths among Palestinian women. Finally, it was thought that participants recruited from hospitals and primary healthcare centers may have a health seeking behavior. In order to minimize the impact of this behavior on study findings, participants were also recruited from public spaces of the governorates corresponding to the included hospitals and primary healthcare centers. However, this may not be a perfect way to account for this. We also attempted to address this issue further by including the site of data collection (hospitals vs. primary healthcare centers vs. public spaces) in all our multivariable analyses. Notably, our findings indicate that participants recruited from hospitals and primary healthcare centers were less likely to demonstrate good awareness of BC causation myths.

Conclusions

This study found a poor awareness of BC causation myths among Palestinian women with only 5% recognizing more than 10 out of 15 BC mythical causes. There were no notable differences in awareness levels between participants from the Gaza Strip and the WBJ. Having a chronic disease and visiting hospitals and primary healthcare centers were associated with a decrease in the likelihood of displaying good awareness. Myths related to food were generally less recognized than other food-unrelated myths. The results of this study suggest that there is a substantial need to include clear information about BC causation in future educational intervention beside focusing on BC screening, signs and symptoms, and risk factors.

Supplementary Information

12889_2023_17074_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.5KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. Summary of the data collection sites included in the study.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants who took part in the survey.

Abbreviations

BC

Breast cancer

LMICs

Low- and middle-income countries

WBJ

West Bank and Jerusalem

CAM-MYCS

Cancer awareness measure-mythical causes scale

CI

Confidence interval

OR

Odds ratio

Authors’ contributions

ME and IOI contributed to the design of the study, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. MA1, IA, RJG, FDU, MAMQ, HMO, NRSS, IIM, AAQF, MRMH, NG, MA2, RKZ, WAA, NKM, RJM, HJAH, RAL, SNU, NAJ, RKA, SNA, BNAA, AJAK, MHD, ROT, DMA, RAM, TS, and SIA contributed to the design of the study, data collection, data entry, and data interpretation. NAE and BB contributed to the design of the study, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, and supervision of the work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Each author has participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Helsinki Committee in the Gaza Strip, the Human Resources Development department at the Palestinian Ministry of Health, and the Islamic University of Gaza Ethics Committee. Written informed consents were obtained from the study participants before starting the interview. All study methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants were given a detailed explanation about the study with the emphasis that participation was completely voluntary, and their decision would not affect the medical care they receive.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mohamedraed Elshami and Islam Osama Ismail contributed equally as a first co-author.

Nasser Abu-El-Noor and Bettina Bottcher contributed equally as a senior co-author.

References

  • 1.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2020: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the Gaza strip and the West Bank in 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/275-gaza-strip-and-west-bank-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 3.Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global Cancer in Women: Burden and Trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(4):444–457. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP). Breast Cancer in Occupied Palestine. https://www.map.org.uk/downloads/map-breast-cancer-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 5.Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M. Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1784–1793. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67725-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Niksic M, Rachet B, Duffy SW, Quaresma M, Moller H, Forbes LJ. Is cancer survival associated with cancer symptom awareness and barriers to seeking medical help in England? An ecological study. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(7):876–886. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elshami M, Kmeil HA, Abu-Jazar M, Mahfouz I, Ashour D, Aljamal A, Mohareb N, Elbalaawi R, Dabbour R, Ghaith J, et al. Breast Cancer Awareness and Barriers to Early Presentation in the Gaza-Strip: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Global Oncol. 2018;4:1–13. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elshami M, Usrof FD, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Okshiya HM, Ghithan RJ, Shurrab NRS, Ismail IO, Mahfouz II, Fannon AA, et al. Awareness of Palestinian Women About Breast Cancer Risk Factors: A National Cross-Sectional Study. JCO Global Oncol. 2022;8:e2200087. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elshami M, Al-Slaibi I, Ghithan RJ, Alser M, Shurrab NR, Ismail IO, Mahfouz II, Fannon AA, Qawasmi MA, Hawa MR, et al. Women's awareness of breast cancer symptoms: a national cross-sectional study from Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13224-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ryan AM, Cushen S, Schellekens H, Bhuachalla EN, Burns L, Kenny U, Power DG. Poor awareness of risk factors for cancer in Irish adults: results of a large survey and review of the literature. Oncologist. 2015;20(4):372–378. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilkinson AV, Vasudevan V, Honn SE, Spitz MR, Chamberlain RM. Sociodemographic characteristics, health beliefs, and the accuracy of cancer knowledge. J Cancer Educ. 2009;24(1):58–64. doi: 10.1080/08858190802664834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daher M. Cultural beliefs and values in cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 3):66–69. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gansler T, Henley SJ, Stein K, Nehl EJ, Smigal C, Slaughter E. Sociodemographic determinants of cancer treatment health literacy. Cancer. 2005;104(3):653–660. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shahab L, McGowan JA, Waller J, Smith SG. Prevalence of beliefs about actual and mythical causes of cancer and their association with socio-demographic and health-related characteristics: Findings from a cross-sectional survey in England. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:308–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). The Palestinians at the end of the year 2019. https://bit.ly/2WBXVBO. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 16.Palestinian Ministry of Health. Annual Health Report 2019. https://tinyurl.com/MOHReport2019. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 17.Elshami M, Abukmail H, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Radaydeh A, Alfuqaha A, Thalji M, Khader S, Khatib L, Fannoun N, et al. Awareness of human papillomavirus and acceptability of the vaccine among women in Palestine: is it time for policy adjustment? BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01930-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Elshami M, Abukmail H, Aqel W, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Shurrab H, Qassem S, Usrof FD, Alruzayqat M, Nairoukh R, et al. Awareness of Palestinians about lung cancer symptoms: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01923-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elshami M, Al-Slaibi I, Abukmail H, Alser M, Radaydeh A, Alfuqaha A, Thalji M, Khader S, Khatib L, Fannoun N, et al. Knowledge of Palestinian women about cervical cancer warning signs: a national cross- sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1779. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11792-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Elshami M, Ayyad M, Hamdan FK, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Naji SA, Mohamad BM, Isleem WS, Shurrab A, Yaghi B, et al. Perceived barriers to early presentation and symptom-specific time to seek medical advice for possible colorectal cancer symptoms among Palestinians. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34136-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elshami M, Ayyad MM, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Ahmed Naji S, Mohamad BM, Sudki Isleem W, Shurrab A, Yaghi B, Qabaja YA, et al. Awareness of colorectal cancer signs and symptoms: a national cross-sectional study from Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13285-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elshami M, Dwikat MF, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Mohamad BM, Isleem WS, Shurrab A, Yaghi B, Qabaja YA, Naji SA, et al. Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors in Palestine: Where Do We Stand? JCO Glob Oncol. 2022;8:e2200070. doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elshami M, Mansour A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Abukmail H, Shurrab H, Qassem S, Usrof FD, Alruzayqat M, Aqel W, et al. Current situation and future directions of lung cancer risk factor awareness in Palestine: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1):e061110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Elshami M, Thalji M, Abukmail H, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Radaydeh A, Alfuqaha A, Khader S, Khatib L, Fannoun N, et al. Knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01510-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Elshami M, Tuffaha A, Yaseen A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Jabr H, Ubaiat S, Khader S, Khraishi R, Jaber I, et al. Awareness of ovarian cancer risk and protective factors: A national cross-sectional study from Palestine. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0265452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elshami M, Yaseen A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Jabr H, Ubaiat S, Tuffaha A, Khader S, Khraishi R, Jaber I, et al. Knowledge of ovarian cancer symptoms among women in Palestine: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1992. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12044-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elshami M, Al-Madhoun S, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Yaseen A, Tuffaha A, Jabr H, Ubaiat S, Khader S, Khraishi R, et al. Anticipated time to seek medical advice for possible ovarian cancer symptoms and perceived barriers to early presentation among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):975. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11484-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Smith SG, Beard E, McGowan JA, Fox E, Cook C, Pal R, Waller J, Shahab L. Development of a tool to assess beliefs about mythical causes of cancer: the Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale. BMJ Open. 2018;8(12):e022825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. KoBoToolbox. https://www.kobotoolbox.org. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 30.AlWaheidi S, McPherson K, Chalmers I, Sullivan R, Davies EA. Mammographic Screening in the Occupied Palestinian Territory: A Critical Analysis of Its Promotion, Claimed Benefits, and Safety in Palestinian Health Research. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:1772–1790. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). On the occasion of the International Workers' Day, H.E. Dr. Ola Awad, President of PCBS, presents the current status of the Palestinian labour force. https://www.pcbs.gov.ps/post.aspx?lang=en&ItemID=3730. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 32.Paytubi S, Benavente Y, Montoliu A, Binefa G, Brotons M, Ibáñez R, Ochoa C, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Serrano B, Travier N, et al. Everything causes cancer? Beliefs and attitudes towards cancer prevention among anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, and reptilian conspiracists: online cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2022;379:e072561. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cunningham SA, Yu R, Shih T, Giordano S, McNeill LH, Rechis R, Peterson SK, Cinciripini P, Foxhall L, Hawk E, et al. Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(3):486–494. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Domínguez M, Sapiña L. From sweeteners to cell phones-Cancer myths and beliefs among journalism undergraduates. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020;29(1):e13180. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.United Nations Population Fund. Pathway to survival: the story of breast cancer in Palestine, analytical mapping of breast cancer care in Palstine: current services, challenges and recommendations for improvement. https://palestine.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Breast%20Cancer%20Report%20Final_0.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 36.Hurtado-Barroso S, Trius-Soler M, Lamuela-Raventós RM, Zamora-Ros R. Vegetable and Fruit Consumption and Prognosis Among Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(6):1569–1582. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR). World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: a Global Perspective. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. https://www.wcrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Summary-of-Third-Expert-Report-2018.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 38.Buja A, Pierbon M, Lago L, Grotto G, Baldo V. Breast Cancer Primary Prevention and Diet: An Umbrella Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(13). 10.3390/ijerph17134731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Dydjow-Bendek D, Zagożdżon P. Selected dietary factors and breast cancer risk. Przegl Epidemiol. 2019;73(3):361–368. doi: 10.32394/pe.73.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fahy E, Hardikar R, Fox A, Mackay S. Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape. Australas Med J. 2014;7(1):24–28. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. Household Survey on Information and Communications Technology, 2019: Main Findings Report. Ramallah - Palestine. https://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Downloads/book2510.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 42.Sumayyia MD, Al-Madaney MM, Almousawi FH. Health information on social media. Perceptions, attitudes, and practices of patients and their companions. Saudi Med J. 2019;40(12):1294–1298. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.12.24682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Johnson SB, Parsons M, Dorff T, Moran MS, Ward JH, Cohen SA, Akerley W, Bauman J, Hubbard J, Spratt DE, et al. Cancer Misinformation and Harmful Information on Facebook and Other Social Media: A Brief Report. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(7):1036–1039. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018;359(6380):1146–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Palestinian Ministry of Health. Health Education. https://shorturl.at/cegD9. Accessed 23 Oct 2023.
  • 46.Lykins EL, Graue LO, Brechting EH, Roach AR, Gochett CG, Andrykowski MA. Beliefs about cancer causation and prevention as a function of personal and family history of cancer: a national, population-based study. Psychooncology. 2008;17(10):967–974. doi: 10.1002/pon.1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Oldach BR, Katz ML. Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(2):149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Institute of Medicine Committee on Health L. In: Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. edn. Edited by Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2004 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 2004. [PubMed]
  • 50.Shi F, Shaver LG, Kong Y, Yi Y, Aubrey-Bassler K, Asghari S, Etchegary H, Adefemi K, Wang PP. Sociodemographics and their impacts on risk factor awareness and beliefs about cancer and screening: results from a cross-sectional study in Newfoundland and Labrador. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09616-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Land LH, Dalton SO, Jensen MB, Ewertz M. Impact of comorbidity on mortality: a cohort study of 62,591 Danish women diagnosed with early breast cancer, 1990–2008. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131(3):1013–1020. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1819-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ording AG, Cronin-Fenton DP, Jacobsen JB, Nørgaard M, Thomsen RW, Christiansen P, Søgaard M. Comorbidity and survival of Danish breast cancer patients from 2000–2011: a population-based cohort study. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5(Suppl 1):39–46. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S47152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tu H, Wen CP, Tsai SP, Chow W-H, Wen C, Ye Y, Zhao H, Tsai MK, Huang M, Dinney CP, et al. Cancer risk associated with chronic diseases and disease markers: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2018;360:k134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hvidberg L, Wulff CN, Pedersen AF, Vedsted P. Barriers to healthcare seeking, beliefs about cancer and the role of socio-economic position A Danish population-based study. Prev Med. 2015;71:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li H, Zeng H, Zheng R, Zou X, Cao M, Sun D, Zhou J, Luo P, Jia S, Zha Z, et al. Association of cancer awareness levels with the risk of cancer in rural China: A population-based cohort study. Cancer. 2020;126(20):4563–4571. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Anderson BO, Ilbawi AM, Fidarova E, Weiderpass E, Stevens L, Abdel-Wahab M, Mikkelsen B. The Global Breast Cancer Initiative: a strategic collaboration to strengthen health care for non-communicable diseases. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(5):578–581. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00071-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12889_2023_17074_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.5KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. Summary of the data collection sites included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES