Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0295012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295012

In vitro antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of thiosemicarbazones based on (-)-camphene and R-(+)-limonene in human melanoma cells

Paula Roberta Otaviano Soares 1,#, Débora Cristina Souza Passos 1,#, Francielly Moreira da Silva 2, Ana Paula B da Silva-Giardini 3, Narcimário Pereira Coelho 4, Cecília Maria Alves de Oliveira 2, Lucília Kato 2, Cleuza Conceição da Silva 3, Lidia Guillo 1,*
Editor: Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna5
PMCID: PMC10688736  PMID: 38032914

Abstract

A series of 38 thiosemicarbazone derivatives based on camphene and limonene were evaluated for their antiproliferative activity. Among them, 19 were synthesized and characterized using proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (1H and 13C NMR). For initial compound selection, human melanoma cells (SK-MEL-37) were exposed to a single concentration of a compound (100 μM) for 24, 48, and 72 hours, and cell detachment was visually observed. Cell viability was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. Nineteen compounds (4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, 31, 3’, 4’, 6’, and 9’) yielded cell viability below 20%. Subsequently, IC50 values for these compounds were determined, ranging from 11.56 to 55.38 μM, after 72 hours of treatment. Compound 17 (o-hydroxybenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone) demonstrated the lowest IC50 value, followed by compound 4 (benzaldehyde (-) camphene-based thiosemicarbazone) at 12.84 μM. Regarding compound 4, we observed the induction of a characteristic ladder pattern of DNA fragmentation through gel electrophoresis. Furthermore, fluorescence, flow cytometry and scanning microscopy assays revealed morphological changes consistent with apoptosis induction. Additionally, the measurement of caspase 6 and 8 activity in cellular extracts after treatment for 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours suggested the potential involvement of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in the mechanism of action of compound 4. Further investigations, including molecular docking studies, are required to fully explore the potential of compound 4 and the other selected compounds, highlighting their promising role in future melanoma therapy research.

Introduction

Cancer encompasses a diverse group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth, necessitating the exploration of antiproliferative strategies. Globally, cancer accounted for approximately 19.3 million new cases and nearly 10.0 million cancer-related deaths in 2020 [1]. Skin cancer, in particular, merits significant attention, as it accounts for approximately 7.9% of total cancer-related deaths. In 2020, 1,500,000 new cases were diagnosed, resulting in approximately 120,000 deaths [2].

Among skin cancers, cutaneous melanoma is an exceptionally aggressive tumor, contributing to nearly 47% of new global skin cancer deaths. The aggressiveness of melanoma arises from its capacity to spread to various organs, including the lungs, liver, brain, bones, and lymph nodes. This is coupled with its remarkable ability to evade the immune system [3]. Melanoma cells share numerous cell surface molecules with vascular cells, which enhances the tumor’s angiogenic potential. Additionally, these cells exhibit a significantly greater degree of stem cell-like properties than other solid tumors. These distinctive features collectively characterize melanoma as an exceptionally challenging neoplasm.

Fortunately, therapeutic options have expanded in recent years due to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that lead to the malignant transformation of melanocytes [4, 5]. Consequently, new avenues of treatment, including immunotherapies and oncolytic vaccines, have emerged alongside the currently approved therapies involving monoclonal antibodies and synthetic kinase inhibitors [69]. Nevertheless, the development of toxicity and resistance continues to pose a significant challenge [10], emphasizing the need to explore new chemotherapeutic agents, whether in combination with immunotherapy or in conjunction with the current inhibitors targeting signaling pathways.

Thiosemicarbazones are synthetic compounds developed for the treatment of various diseases owing to their versatile activities, including antiviral, antibacterial, antiparasitic, and anticancer activities [11, 12]. Their antineoplastic activities are well documented in the literature across various tumor cell lines and some animal models [13, 14]. For instance, 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxyaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (Triapine®), advanced to phase II clinical trials. However, due to adverse effects observed with that compound, extensive research has been conducted to explore other derivatives that exhibit enhanced activity and selectivity. Concurrently, investigations into their mechanisms of action have made significant progress in recent years. Beyond the well-established pathways, such as ribonucleotide reductase activity inhibition and the generation of reactive oxygen species, apoptosis has emerged as a proposed mechanism [15]. We previously chose natural products such as camphene and limonene as starting materials for synthesizing thiosemicarbazide and thiosemicarbazone derivatives with antifungal [1618], antibacterial [19, 20] and anticancer activities [21]. In this study, we expanded the series of thiosemicarbazones containing camphene and limonene, synthesizing novel derivatives that were characterized using spectroscopic methods. As our specific focus was on identifying potential anti-melanoma agents, we utilized the human melanoma cell line SK-MEL-37 derived from cutaneous metastatic melanoma. These cells notably express numerous antigens associated with melanoma [22], including those crucial for metastasis [23], making them an invaluable cellular model for screening potential therapeutic agents against this aggressive cancer.

This work achieved its objective by demonstrating that several derivatives, including novel compounds, exhibited antiproliferative activity. Evidence of apoptosis was obtained through DNA fragmentation, flow cytometry, and scanning electron microscopy techniques. We also demonstrated the induction of caspase enzymatic activity.

Materials and methods

Chemistry

In this study, we investigated a total of 38 compounds, and their molecular structures are illustrated in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Synthetic route and reaction conditions for the target compounds.

Fig 1

The synthesis of the target compounds was accomplished through a series of reactions. The reactions were carried out as follows: (a) KHSO4, KSCN, CHCl3, at room temperature for 24 hours; (b) NH2NH2, HCl/NaCO3/H2O, in EtOH, refluxed at 90°C for 3 hours; (c) CHCl3, HCl, at room temperature; (d) SiO2, HSO4 5%; and (e) EtOH, HSO4 25%. All compounds whose structures are presented were tested in this study, except for compounds 1’ and 2’. The bold numbers in the figure correspond to novel compounds, whose structural characterization can be found in the S1 File.

The specifications of all solvents and reagents, including the natural monoterpenes camphene 1 and limonene 1’, used in the synthesis of the studied compounds were previously described [2426]. The synthesis of (-)-camphene 2 and R-(+)-limonene 2’ isothiocyanates followed the methods described in the literature [27, 28], and their infrared, mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were determined [18, 2426]. The preparation and structural characterization of (-)-camphene 3 and R-(+)-limonene 3’ thiosemicarbazides were also previously detailed [18, 2426].

The aldehyde series of camphene-based thiosemicarbazones was initiated based on the synthesis of benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazones (4–14, Fig 1) by Barbosa da Silva, 2010 [24]. Among these, the syntheses of benzaldehyde -(-)- camphene-based (4), p-methoxy(6), o-chloro (7), p-chloro (9), p-nitro (12), p-dimethylamine (13) and p-hydroxy (14) were previously published, and the compounds were evaluated for anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. activity [19, 20]. The remaining compounds (5, 8, 10, 11) synthesized by da Silva et al. [24], are still unpublished and are highlighted in bold in Fig 1. Next, another three compounds of the camphene-based benzaldehyde series were synthesized (15, 16, 17; Fig 1) [25], among which p-fluoro (16) and o-hydroxy (17) have already been evaluated for anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity [20].

The synthesis procedures for the newly synthesized camphene-based derivatives are detailed below.

Experimental procedures for synthesis of the new benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazones (5, 8, 10, 11, and 15)

Equimolar amounts of the following aldehydes were added to a flask with a magnetic stirrer and containing 1.1 mmol of camphene thiosemicarbazide solubilized in chloroform: p-tolualdehyde, m-chlorobenzaldehyde, o-nitrobenzaldehyde, and m-nitrobenzaldehyde. The mixture was stirred for 15 minutes at room temperature in the presence of a catalytic amount of concentrated hydrochloric acid. The progress of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) using a 30% hexane/ethyl acetate mixture as the eluent. Subsequently, the solvent was evaporated, and the product was recrystallized from ethanol, with a 90–95% yield. The synthesis of compound 15 was carried out using the following procedure. A total of 0.44 mmol of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde was added to a round-bottomed flask with a magnetic stirrer. Absolute ethyl alcohol and one drop of 25% sulfuric acid were added, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. After this period, 100 mg (0.44 mmol) of thiosemicarbazide was added to the reaction mixture. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using n-hexane/ethyl acetate (7:3) as the eluent and resublimated iodine as the developer. All reactions were performed at room temperature. The solvent was rotary evaporated, and the product was purified by crystallization from absolute ethanol.

Experimental procedures for the synthesis of the new substituted acetophenone (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazones (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24)

The ketone series of camphene-based thiosemicarbazones was prepared and characterized by Coelho, 2011 [25]. It consists of seven compounds (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24; Fig 1), all of which have yet to be published. The experimental procedure is outlined below, with characterization and spectra provided in the Supporting Information (S1 File).

Ten milligrams of silica gel:5% H2SO4 and 2 mmol of one of the following carbonyl compounds were added to a test tube: acetophenone, p-nitroacetophenone, p-chloroacetophenone, p-methoxyacetophenone, p-methylacetophenone, p-fluoroacetophenone, and p-hydroxyacetophenone. The mixture was stirred for 1 minute, and then an equimolar amount of (-)-camphene thiosemicarbazide was added. The mixture was manually shaken for a period of 5–20 minutes under microwave irradiation for 1-min intervals at minimum power. To monitor the reaction, a small amount was removed, solubilized in methanol and subjected to TLC using 7:3 n-hexane:ethyl acetate as the eluent and resublimated iodine as the developer. After completion of the reaction, the product was extracted with absolute ethyl alcohol and then filtered to remove the silica gel. Thiosemicarbazones were obtained by crystallization with yields of 85–97% without the need for purification.

Experimental procedures for the synthesis of the new camphene-based thiosemicarbazones with heterocyclic aldehyde nuclei (25, 26, and 27)

Three novel thiosemicarbazones bearing heterocyclic aldehyde moieties and derived from (-)-camphene (25, 26, 27, Fig 1) were synthesized following the method described by Coelho in 2011 [25]. The detailed experimental procedure can be found below, while characterization data and spectra are provided in the Supporting Information (S1 File). Notably, these results have not yet been published.

A total of 0.44 mmol of one of the following aldehydes, thiophene-2-carboxaldehyde, 1H-pyrrole carboxaldehyde, or 2-furaldehyde, was added to a round-bottomed flask with a magnetic stirrer. Absolute ethyl alcohol and one drop of 25% sulfuric acid were then added, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. After this period, 100 mg (0.44 mmol) of thiosemicarbazide (30) was added to the reaction mixture. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC using n-hexane/ethyl acetate (7:3) as the eluent and resublimated iodine as the developer. All reactions were performed at room temperature. The solvent was rotary evaporated, and the products were purified by crystallization from absolute ethanol.

Experimental procedures for the synthesis of the new camphene-based thiosemicarbazones 28, 29, 30, and 31

Thiosemicarbazones derived from (-)-camphene with the substituents benzophenone (28), cinnamic aldehyde (29), menthone (30), and ethyl pyruvate (31), all of which are novel, were synthesized based on the methodology described in [25] and have not been published to date. The experimental procedure is detailed below, with molecular characterization and spectra available in S1 File.

Ten milligrams of silica gel:5% H2SO4 and 2 mmol of one of the following carbonyl compounds were added to a test tube: benzophenone and cinnamic aldehyde. The mixture was stirred for 1 minute, and then an equimolar amount of previously ground (-)camphene thiosemicarbazide was added. The mixture was manually stirred for a period of 5–20 minutes under microwave irradiation for 1-min intervals at minimum power. To monitor the reaction, a small amount was removed, solubilized in methanol and subjected to TLC using 7:3 n-hexane:ethyl acetate as the eluent and resublimated iodine as the developer. After completion of the reaction, the product was extracted with absolute ethyl alcohol and then filtered to remove the silica gel. Thiosemicarbazones were obtained by crystallization, with yields of 85–97% without the need for purification. Compounds 30 and 31 were prepared by a procedure identical to that described for the synthesis of compounds with heterocycle aldehyde nuclei, with the addition of menthone and ethylpyruvate, respectively, to the carbonyl compound.

The series of limonene-based thiosemicarbazones derived from benzaldehyde (4’, 5’, 6’, 7’, 8’, 9’; Fig 1) were prepared by the method described by Barbosa da Silva, 2010 [24], and have been previously published and assessed for their antitumor and antileishmanial activities [21, 29]. Details of the synthesis procedures can be found in the cited articles.

Preparation and dilution of test compounds

Solid compounds were first solubilized in a small volume of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) followed by the addition of absolute ethanol (1:14, v/v). The stock concentration of all compounds was 20 mM. Serial dilutions (1:1) were then prepared in absolute ethanol, and new stock concentrations were prepared: 10 mM, 5 mM, 25 mM, 12.5 mM, 6.25 mM and 3.125 mM. These solutions were stored at room temperature in a humidified chamber until use. A constant volume of these serial solutions was added directly to cultured cells so that the final concentration of ethanol was kept constant at 1% for all compound concentrations, and the maximum final concentration of DMSO was 0.035%. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (Sigma‒Aldrich) was prepared in sterile distilled water at a 20 mM stock concentration and was used as a reference compound [30].

Cell culture growth conditions

The human melanoma cell line SK-MEL-37 was kindly provided by Dr Lloyd Old (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA) in 2000 [22]. The cells were maintained in Gibco Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) from Thermo Fisher Scientific Walthan MA, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Cultilab, Brazil) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (Invitrogen, USA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The cells were routinely screened for mycoplasma contamination with a MycoFluor™ Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Invitrogen, USA).

Growth characteristics were periodically checked by calculating the population doubling time (PDT) with the formula: N = 2z x No, where N = the cell number on the established day, No = the cell number on day 0 (inoculation day) and z = the number of generations, where z = T/PDT. Cells were counted using a handheld automated cell counter (Scepter, Millipore) and inoculated into 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks on day 0. At 24, 48, 72, 96, 100 and 120 h, the cells were harvested and counted, and the PDT was calculated. For experiments, cell densities were adjusted according to the PDT to 2.5 x 104, 1.5 x 104 and 8 x 103 cells/well for 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. All experiments were conducted during the exponential growth phase.

Prescreening and cell viability studies

All tested compounds were first screened at a single dose (100 μM) in quadruplicate wells and monitored over 24, 48, and 72 hours by observing the detachment of cells with an inverted microscope. At the end of 72 h, the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltatrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma‒Aldrich) test (see below) was performed to quantify the percentage of detached cells in relation to that among cells treated with the solvent (control), and the values were plotted on a graph of cell viability (% of control). Cell viability was calculated by the formula: absorbance (treated cells)/absorbance (solvent-treated cells) x 100. The experiments were conducted on three independent occasions. Compounds that induced more than 80% detachment of cells (resulting in less than 20% cell viability) were chosen for further experimentation to determine their inhibitory concentration (IC50), which is the drug concentration that reduces survival by 50%. The selected compounds were added in six different dilutions (with final concentrations of 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25.0, 50.0, and 100 x 10−6 M) in quadruplicate wells. These experiments were performed on three separate occasions. After treatment, cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay, which detects mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity in viable cells [31], with slight modifications. Briefly, MTT solution was added directly to the culture medium, and the plates were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The medium was aspirated, and a 300 μL aliquot of pure cold methanol was added and incubated with slight agitation for 10 minutes in the dark at RT. A 200 μL aliquot was transferred to a 96-well microplate, and absorbance readings at 570 nm were performed on a microplate reader (ELX 800, Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.). Control cells were treated with final maximum DMSO/ethanol concentrations of 0.035% and 1%, respectively. This solvent concentration had no cytotoxic effect on the cells. The concentration response curves were generated by plotting cell viability versus log concentration to obtain the inhibitory concentration (IC50).

DNA fragmentation analysis

SK-MEL-37 cells were seeded in 100 mm dishes and grown at 37°C until 80% confluence when they were treated with 100 μM test compounds. The treated cells were harvested at 24, 48, or 72 hours, depending on the observed cell detachment time, and lysed in buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA and 0.5% Triton X-100. The cell lysate was then treated with RNase A (100 μg/ml, final) for 30 min and proteinase K (200 μg/mL, final) for 30 min at 37°C in a water bath. Total DNA was extracted with an equal volume of saturated phenol‒chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) (Sigma Aldrich, USA), precipitated with two volumes of cold ethanol and 0.5 M sodium chloride, and pelleted by centrifugation. The DNA pellet was resuspended in 30 μL of 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and analyzed in a 2% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide for visualization of the DNA fragments (DNA ladders).

Fluorescence microscopy

Staining with propidium iodide

Cells were seeded on 35 mm culture dishes and incubated in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37°C until they adhered. Next, the cells were treated with compounds 4, 8, and 11 at a concentration of 50 μM for 6, 10 and 24 hours. Four hours after the completion of each treatment period, a propidium iodide (PI) solution was added, and the cells were monitored for growth using an inverted fluorescence microscope. Images were captured using a Nikon E6000 Eclipse fluorescence microscope. Compounds 13 and 6 were also evaluated; however, their effects were observed only after 48 and 72 h of treatment, respectively (images not shown).

In vivo Caspase-3 fluorescence

Caspase-3 activity in vivo was detected using a NucView 488 Caspase-3 Kit for Live Cells from Biotium (Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Melanoma cells (SK-MEL-37) were seeded in 3.5 cm2 petri dishes (Nunc Brand Products, USA) at a concentration suitable to reach confluency within 48 hours. Twenty-four hours after seeding, benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (100 μM) was added; 8 hours later, the medium was removed and replaced with a culture medium containing NucViewTM solution (1 μM). Fifteen minutes after the addition of the NucViewTM solution, the cells were monitored and photographed using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Eclipse TE 2000S, NIKON) to detect caspase activity in real time.

Caspase activity assay

Caspase 2, 3, 6, 8 and 9 activity was determined using a Caspase Colorimetric Protease Assay Kit, Apo Target™ (Invitrogen, USA). For each protease assayed, exponentially growing cells (3 x 105 cells/mL) were cultured in 100-mm dishes and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and with 5% CO2 for cell adhesion. The medium was then aspirated and replaced by fresh medium containing a fixed concentration of 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4). The cells were treated for 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours at 37°C and with 5% CO2. At the end of each incubation period, cells were harvested and collected by centrifugation for 3 min at 2,000 rpm and washed twice in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were transferred to a 1.5 mL microfuge tube and collected again by centrifugation for 3 minutes at 2,000 rpm. The cell pellet was resuspended in 110 μL of cold cell lysis buffer provided by the kit, the suspension was incubated on ice for 10 minutes, and the suspension was clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. Ten microliter aliquots of the supernatant were removed for protein concentration determination. All further steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with slight modifications. To standardize the optimal incubation time for the enzymatic reaction, duplicate aliquots of 50 μL of the supernatant were combined with 50 μL of the reaction buffer containing 10 mM DTT. The mixture was then incubated in the dark at 37°C for 2, 15, and 30 hours with 200 μM peptide substrates. The substrates were VDVAD (Val-Asp-Val-Ala-Asp- for caspase-2), DEVD (Asp-Glu-Val-Asp for caspase-3), VEID (Val-Glu-Ile-Asp for caspase-6), IETD (Ile-Glu-Thr-Asp- for caspase-8), and LEHD (Leu-Glu-His-Asp- for caspase-9), and they were labeled at their C-terminal region with the chromophore p-nitroaniline (pNA). Samples (100 μL) were transferred in duplicate to wells of a microtiter plate. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader (Biotek, USA). The experiments were performed on two separate occasions. Additionally, a standard curve was plotted to calculate the concentration of the chromophore p-nitroaniline released by caspase activity. A 10 mM stock solution of p-nitroaniline in DMSO was prepared, and solutions containing 200 μM, 100 μM, 50 μM, 20 μM, 10 μM and 5 μM of the standard were made in the lysis buffer provided by the kit. The results were plotted using GraphPad Prism 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA). The graph of the enzymatic kinetics obtained for each caspase, as well as the standard curve, are presented in the Supporting Information (S2 File).

The protein concentration in each sample was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay [32], with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard protein. The standards were prepared by serial dilutions resulting in concentrations ranging from 200 μg/mL to 6.25 μg/mL. Each sample was diluted (1:100) in PBS (pH 7.2), and 50 μL was added to a 4% copper sulfate and BCA solution at a 1:50 ratio. The samples were transferred to triplicate wells of a microtiter plate and incubated at 60°C for 30 minutes, followed by incubation at room temperature for 15 minutes. The absorbance of the samples was then measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (ELX-800, Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.).

The concentration of both p-nitroaniline and protein in each sample was determined using the respective standard curves generated with the GraphPad Prism program, version 4.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA, www.graphpad.com). Subsequently, the activity of caspases was calculated by dividing the concentration of p-nitroaniline by the concentration of protein. These values were then plotted in the graphs as μM/μg protein.

Flow cytometric assays

Annexin staining

For this experiment, a TACSTM Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (R&D System) was employed according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Cells were seeded in 10 cm2 Petri dishes and incubated for 24 hours before being treated with either 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone or 100 μM benzaldehyde R-(+)-limonene-based thiosemicarbazone. After 8 hours of treatment, the cells were detached using a cell scraper, washed with DPBS (4°C), and collected by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 3 minutes. The resulting pellet was washed twice with DPBS and then labeled with Annexin and PI solution (10 μL of 10x buffer, 10 μL of PI, 1 μL of Annexin V-FITC, 79 μL of Milli-Q water) and incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. After incubation, 400 μL of 1x buffer (50 μL of 10x buffer and 450 μL of Milli-Q water) was added, and the sample was allowed to rest for 30 minutes. Acquisition was performed in a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Frankilin Lakes, New Jersey, USA), with 10,000 events registered. Early and late apoptotic events were analyzed using CellQuestTM software.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells were cultured on 3.5 cm2 petri dishes (Nunc Brand Products, USA) coated with 0.1% gelatin. Benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (100 μM) was added to the cells, and the cells were incubated for 8 hours. The cells were then fixed with Karnovsky’s fixative solution at 4°C for 72 hours, followed by washing with DPBS containing Ca++ and Mg++. The cells were subsequently washed twice with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 5 minutes each time, dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol (30%-100%), and embedded in 1 mL of hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) for 30 minutes at room temperature. The samples were coated with a thin layer of gold and imaged using a scanning electron microscope (Jeol, JSM—6610) equipped for energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and with the Thermo Scientific NSS Spectral Imaging system, operating at 4 kV. As a control, the same experimental procedure was performed on SK-MEL-37 cells treated with the solvent only, consisting of DMSO/ethanol concentrations of 0.035% and 1%, respectively.

Data calculations

The prescreening study results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel software, version 365, and are presented graphically as a percentage relative to the cells treated with the solvent, using the formula: cell viability = absorbance (treated cells)/absorbance (solvent-treated cells) x 100. For these experiments, the mean and the standard deviation (SD) for quadruplicate wells from triplicate experiments are presented. The inhibitory concentration value (IC50) was obtained using a nonlinear regression model based on a sigmoidal dose‒response curve. This calculation was performed for 4 wells in triplicate samples using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows, GraphPad software (San Diego, California, USA, www.graphpad.com). Results are expressed as the arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) for three independent experiments. The caspase activity data are presented as the arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) from two separate experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc Dunnett’s test for comparisons with the control group.

Results

Cell culture characteristics and antiproliferative activity

First, we established the growth curve for the cell line under investigation (not shown), following the protocol outlined in the Materials and methods section. A PDT value of 30 hours was obtained, which was then used to calculate the number of cells seeded for each time point (24, 48, and 72 hours) of drug treatment. This approach ensured that the cells were maintained in the exponential growth phase during drug treatment at the different time points.

The determination of the IC50 value is an important step in the study of cytotoxicity [24]. These investigations were preceded by experiments that assessed cell viability using a single concentration for treatment. In this study, cells were treated with a concentration of 100 μM compound and visually monitored for 24, 48 and 72 hours. After 72 hours, cell viability was determined using the MTT method. The results of this prescreening process for 38 compounds are shown in Fig 2 (left axis), and 19 compounds yielded cell viability below 20% and were selected for further IC50 determination studies. Among these selected compounds, visual observations revealed that cell detachment occurred within different timeframes. Specifically, compound 13 (p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based) produced cell detachment after 48 hours of treatment, whereas compound 6 (p-methoxybenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone) induced this effect after 72 hours. In contrast, the remaining compounds exhibited this effect within 24 hours of treatment. Fig 2 illustrates the results after 72 hours of treatment. The IC50 values for the 19 selected compounds are presented in Table 1 and are displayed on the right axis of Fig 2. The compounds in Table 1 are ordered by their numbering, not by their IC50 values.

Fig 2. Effect of camphene- and limonene-based thiosemicarbazones on the viability of human SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells.

Fig 2

The left y-axis indicates the percentage cell viability for the compounds. The columns in the figure represent the mean and standard deviation (SD) for quadruplicate wells from three independent experiments. Compounds inducing cell viability below 20% (on the left axis) were selected for determining IC50 values (on the right axis). The IC50 values shown in the figure were calculated from the mean and SD for three independent experiments. Please note that the standard deviation of IC50 values is not displayed in the figure. The compound chosen for further experiments assessing the DNA fragmentation profile, morphological alterations, flow cytometry profile and caspase activity is represented by a blank column. The compounds named "camphene-based thiosemicarbazone" have been abbreviated as "camphene-based" on the x-axis. The number of each compound is indicated in parentheses.

Table 1. Selected compounds with their respective IC50 values obtained.

Compound Number in Fig 1 IC50 (μM), Mean (SD) Ref *
Benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 4 12.84 (1.14) [20]
p-Methoxybenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 6 32.18 (2.01) [20]
m-Chlorobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 8 13.1 (1.15)
m-Nitrobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 11 23.1 (2.13)
p-Dimethylaminebenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 13 34.55(1.22) [20]
p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 14 15.39 (2.77) [19, 20]
m-Methoxy-p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 15 55.38 (3.03)
p-Fluorobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 16 12.90 (1.07) [20]
o-Hydroxybenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 17 11.56 (1.21) [20]
Acetophenone (-)-camphene-based 18 17.54 (1.52)
p-Chloroacetophenone (-)-camphene-based 20 48.69 (2.88)
p-Methylacetophenone (-)-camphene-based 22 52.26 (2.75)
Thiophene-2-carboxyaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 25 14.38 (1.86)
Furaldehyde (-)-camphene-based 26 24.78 (1.67)
Ethylpyruvate (-)-camphene-based 31 26.95(2.03)
Limonene thiosemicarbazide 3’ 15.89 (1.35) [21, 29]
Benzaldehyde R-(+)-limonene-based 4’ 49.26 (2.34) [21]
m-Nitrobenzaldehyde R-(+)- limonene based 6’ 14.17 (1.54) [21]
p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde R-(+)- limonene based 9’ 24.75 (1.97) [21]
Doxorubicin (reference compound) - 30.21 (2.12) [30] #

The compounds highlighted in bold are novel.

*References were evaluated for biological activities, such as antituberculosis, antibacterial, and antileishmanial activities.

The compounds mentioned were tested on melanoma cells of the UACC-62 lineage in ref. 12, and the reported values for 3’, 4’, 6’, and 9’ were as follows: not tested, 31.6 μM, >100 μM, and >100 μM, respectively.

#The reported value for SK-MEL-37 cells was 35 μM.

We observed that the IC50 values were distributed between approximately 56 μM and 11 μM. Of the 19 compounds selected, 9 were novel compounds (compounds 8, 11, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, and 31), which have not been previously reported in the literature. The remaining 10 compounds listed in Table 1 were previously evaluated for different activities, such as antibacterial activity [19], anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis activity [20], antileishmanial activity [20], or anticancer activity against other tumor cell lines [21].

Evaluation of apoptotic DNA ladder induction

In the following set of experiments, we aimed to investigate the mechanism of cell death induced by the selected compounds. As shown in Fig 3 and S1 Raw image, treatment with compounds 4, 8 and 11 induced a typical DNA “laddering” pattern, which is indicative of apoptotic events, after 24 hours of continuous drug exposure. Additionally, compounds 14, 13, and 6 elicited a similar effect at different time points (24, 48 and 72 hours of incubation, respectively; results not shown). The remaining compounds were not tested in this study of the mode of cell death induction.

Fig 3. Analysis of DNA fragmentation.

Fig 3

Exponentially growing SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells were treated with 100 μM concentrations of the indicated compounds: (4) benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone; (8) m-chlorobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone; and (11) m-nitrobenzaldehyde(-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone. After 24 hours of incubation, attached and floating cells were collected, and DNA was extracted and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis as detailed in the Materials and Methods section. Molecular weight (MW): DNA 100 bp ladder (Invitrogen).

Morphological changes determined by different techniques

Fluorescence microscopy analysis

Fluorescence microscopy revealed morphological changes in detached cells as early as 6 hours of drug exposure for compound 8,as depicted in Fig 4A. These changes persisted after 10 hours (Fig 4B) and 24 hours (Fig 4C). Likewise, compounds 4, 11, and 14 demonstrated similar effects, although not illustrated in the figure. Morphological alterations were observed with compounds 13 and 6; however, these changes became apparent only after 48 and 72 hours of incubation, respectively (results not shown). The remaining compounds were not subjected to this testing.

Fig 4. Morphological assessment of apoptotic changes observed through different techniques.

Fig 4

Panels A to C show fluorescence microscopy images of SK-MEL-37 cells exposed to m-chlorobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 8) at a concentration of 50 μM. Propidium iodide was added to the culture medium 4 hours after treatment and remained in the medium throughout the incubation period. After 6 hours of treatment, a few cells with fragmented nuclei were observed in panel A (indicated by arrows), and their numbers increased after 10 (panel B) and 24 hours (panel C) of treatment. The addition of propidium iodide did not affect the untreated cells. All observed cells were floating in the culture medium. Panels D to G show scanning electron microscopy images of cells cultured for 8 hours and treated with the solvent only (panels D and E) or with 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (panels F and G), which resulted in a reduction in the number of membrane projections and the appearance of vacuoles in treated cells. Panels J and K show SK-MEL-37 cells treated with benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4) at a concentration of 100 μM for 6 hours, and panels H and I display control cells. All cells were stained with NucViewTM for caspase-3 activity detection using fluorescence microscopy. The images in panels H and J were captured without a fluorescent filter to enhance the visibility of morphological distinctions between control cells and treated cells. Overall, this figure demonstrates the morphological changes induced by compounds 4 and 8 in SK-MEL-37 cells as visualized through fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy.

In vivo fluorescence-based caspase 3 activity analysis

Caspase 3 activity was measured in SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells treated with 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4) for 8 hours using a NucViewTM kit. This kit contains a fluorogenic substrate that specifically detects activated caspases in apoptotic cells by labeling the nuclei with a green fluorescent signal. Fig 4, shows a clear distinction between the control cells and the treated cells (compare panels H versus J; I versus K respectively) These results suggest that caspase-3 is activated in living treated cells, providing further evidence that the cellular death mechanism may be primarily due to induction of apoptosis.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis

SEM analysis revealed changes on the surface of cells following treatment with 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4). Untreated cells showed numerous cytoplasmic projections (Fig 4, panels D and E), whereas cells treated with compound 4 for 8 hours exhibited a reduction in the number of these projections and the formation of vacuoles (Fig 4, panels F and G), consistent with apoptotic changes.

Colorimetric assay for measuring the activity of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9

To gain a better understanding of the mechanism of action of the compounds under investigation, we performed a colorimetric assay to measure the activity of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9. Notably, this assay was conducted exclusively with compound 4, which was chosen as a representative based on the IC50 value obtained.

Fig 5 displays the results of the colorimetric assay measuring the activity of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9. Our findings indicated that caspases 6 and 8 exhibited activity within the first 2 hours of treatment with compound 4. Only caspases 6 and 8 were significantly activated in relation to the level in the control, but the activity of caspase 8 rapidly decreased to low levels after 4 h, remaining low at 6 and 24 h of incubation. The activity of caspase 6 remained elevated, reaching its peak at 6 hours and declining at 24 hours of incubation. These results suggested that compound 4 could selectively activate mainly caspases 6 and 8 and that their activation is time-dependent during the period of incubation.

Fig 5. Caspase 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 activity in SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells.

Fig 5

Exponentially growing cells were treated with 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone for 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours, as specified in the figure. The activity of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 was determined by incubation with 200 μM peptide substrates at 37°C under reaction conditions that were standardized as detailed in the Materials and methods section. The kinetics graphs obtained can be found in S2 File. The values presented in the figure correspond to the activity obtained at the optimal incubation time, which was 15 or 30 hours. This figure displays columns representing the mean and standard deviation of duplicate wells from two independent experiments. Statistical significance (*, p < 0.05) is indicated in the figure. The values were compared with those for the control using ANOVA with a Dunnett post hoc test.

Annexin V-FITC/PI staining assessment by flow cytometry

In Fig 6, treatment with benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4) for just 8 hours resulted in the detection of recent and late apoptotic features in 3.7% and 62% of cells, respectively. Similarly, for benzaldehyde R-(+)-limonene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4’), the percentages of cells exhibiting early and late apoptotic events were 16% and 23%, respectively. These findings suggest that both compounds have the potential to induce apoptosis in cells, although compound 4 appears to be more effective in inducing late apoptotic events than compound 4’. The high proportion of cells in late apoptosis observed for compound 4 is consistent with the DNA fragmentation profile observed by agarose gel electrophoresis, further supporting its potency in inducing apoptosis.

Fig 6. Early and late apoptotic events in SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells.

Fig 6

Exponentially growing cells were treated with (A) solvent (DMSO), (B) 100 μM benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4) or (C) 100 μM benzaldehyde R-(+)-limonene-based thiosemicarbazone (compound 4’). After 8 hours of treatment, the cells were labeled with Annexin and propidium iodide (PI) for flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis. The results showed that treatment with both substances induced early and late apoptotic events.

Discussion

In this study, we synthesized and structurally characterized 19 thiosemicarbazone compounds based on (-)-camphene using 1H and 13C-NMR techniques. The structure of these compounds is illustrated in Fig 1, and structural characterization is provided in S1 File. This is the first time that the biological activity of these compounds has been evaluated. The antiproliferative activity of these thiosemicarbazones was investigated in SK-MEL-37 melanoma cells. Among these newly synthesized compounds, nine compounds, m-chlorobenzaldehyde (8), m-nitrobenzaldehyde (11), m-methoxybenzaldehyde (15), acetophenone (18), p-chloroacetophenone (20), p-methylacetophenone (22), thiophene-2-carboxyaldehyde (25), furaldehyde (26) and ethylpyruvate (31) (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone, exhibited antiproliferative activity, with cell viability below 20% and IC50 values ranging from 13–55 μM. They have shown promising antiproliferative activity against human melanoma cells and warrant further evaluation in future studies.

Additionally, thirteen (-)-camphene and six R-(+)-limonene-based thiosemicarbazones (see structure in Fig 1) were previously assessed for various biological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal and antileishmanial properties. Here, they were evaluated for their antiproliferative activity against SK-MEL-37 cells, and ten compounds produced cell viability lower than 20%, with IC50 values ranging from 11 to 49 μM.

Thus, (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone containing p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (14) and o-hydroxybenzaldehyde (17) exhibited IC50 values of 15.39 and 11.56 μM against SK-MEL-37 cells, respectively. Notably, compound 17 demonstrated the lowest IC50 value among all the compounds examined in our study. In a previously reported study, these same two compounds were found to have the best minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against M. tuberculosis and were also the most cytotoxic toward Vero cells, with IC50 values of 18.5 and 6.7 mg/mL, respectively [20], equivalent to 55 μM and 20 μM, based on their molecular weight. Additionally, compound 14 was found to be active against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. in another study [19]. Interestingly, p-nitrobenzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based (12) exhibited poor antiproliferative activity against SK-MEL-37 cells (Fig 2, left y-axis) and no anti-tuberculosis activity [20]. Importantly, the presence of antimicrobial/antifungal activities in a compound does not guarantee anticancer potential, and conversely, the absence of antimicrobial/antifungal activities does not imply the absence of anticancer activity.

When examining the antiproliferative activity against human melanoma cells of another cell line, we observed that the compound benzaldehyde R-(+)-limonene-based thiosemicarbazone (4’) exhibited antiproliferative activity against SK-MEL-37 cells (in this study) and UACC-62 cells in a previously published study [21], with IC50 values of 49.26 μM and 31.6 μμM, respectively. However, the compounds m-nitrobenzaldehyde limonene-based (6’) and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde limonene-based thiosemicarbazone (9’) were not active against UACC-62 melanoma cells in a previous study [21] but showed activity against SK-MEL-37 cells in our study, with IC50 values of 14.17 and 24.75 μM, respectively.

Next, we prioritized compound 4 in our attempt to explore the mechanism of action of this class of compounds, as it exhibited one of the lowest IC50 values among the 38 compounds evaluated and was also easily synthetized.

Using the DNA ladder assay, we observed DNA fragments that are highly indicative of apoptotic cell death. Although this technique is simple and does not require specialized equipment, it is worth noting that internucleosomal DNA fragmentation typically occurs in the latter stages of apoptotic processes [33]. Additionally, the absence of the "smear" pattern typically observed in necrotic processes suggests that necrosis is less likely to be a prominent event. These findings were further corroborated by flow cytometry, which detected a proportion of such events. Further analysis using fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy revealed numerous morphological alterations, including nuclear fragmentation and cell shrinkage. Activation of caspase 3 in living cells was also easily observed by fluorescence, further confirming the occurrence of apoptotic processes.

To identify the possible signaling pathways involved, we conducted an assay to detect the activity of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 in cell lysates, and we found that the tested compound 4 induced the activity of caspases 6 and 8 as early as 2 hours after drug treatment. Notably, the induction of caspase 6 activity persisted for 4 hours and reached a peak after 6 hours, a trend not observed with caspase 8. The early and abrupt activation of caspase 8 suggested that compound 4 may initiate the death receptor (DR) pathway, leading to caspase 3 activation and subsequent cell death [34]. The activation of caspase 6 suggests that compound 4 may also elicit intracellular signaling, leading to the activation of the intrinsic pathway. However, importantly, despite caspase 6’s well-known role as an executioner caspase in the intrinsic pathway, it may also possess an initiation function, potentially priming the cell for the receptor-mediated pathway [35]. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the tested compound 4 may act through an extrinsic apoptotic pathway, although the involvement of the intrinsic pathway cannot be completely ruled out. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanism of action not only of compound 4 but also of the preselected compounds with low IC50 values, which was not possible due to budgetary constraints.

These findings indicated the promising potential of the investigated compounds as therapeutic agents for cancer treatment, as they exhibited IC50 values below those found for the reference compound, doxorubicin. Further investigation into their precise mechanisms is crucial to fully comprehend their therapeutic properties. The discovery of compounds that induce apoptotic cell death holds significant value, as this mode of cell death is frequently associated with a reduced likelihood of drug resistance and improved clinical outcomes [36]. Moreover, to our knowledge, the activation of caspase 8 has not been previously observed, as the intrinsic pathway involving the formation of reactive oxygen species predominates in the mode of action of various other thiosemicarbazone derivatives, according to previous reports [37].

Conclusions

Thiosemicarbazone derivatives, synthesized from (-)-camphene and R(+)-limonene, demonstrated significant antiproliferative activity against human metastatic melanoma cells, emphasizing their potential for further exploration in the context of aggressive melanoma therapy. Benzaldehyde (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazone, devoid of substituents on the benzene ring, induced apoptotic events, as confirmed by DNA fragmentation, flow cytometry, and scanning electron microscopy assays. These findings were accompanied by observation of the activation of caspase 6 and 8 enzymatic activities, suggesting the involvement of the extrinsic pathway. Subsequent studies should encompass a variety of cancer cell lines, in vivo models, and docking studies to elucidate the mode of action of these compounds.

Supporting information

S1 File. Structural characterization of new thiosemicarbazone derivatives.

Structural characterization by 1H and 13C NMR of the new (-)-camphene-based compounds.

(PDF)

S2 File. Standardization for the colorimetric enzymatic assay of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8 and 9.

Optimization of kinetic conditions for the enzymatic reaction of caspases.

(PDF)

S1 Raw image. Raw electrophoresis gel image.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Elisangela Ribeiro, Immunophenotyping Laboratory, Cancer Combat Association in Goiás, Brazil, for help with and expertise in flow cytometry. We thank Dr. Fabio Vandresen, State University of Maringá, for suggestions regarding manuscript organization.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was made possible through the research fellowships awarded to PROS and DCSP by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) of Brazil. These fellowships supported PROS during her master's studies and DCSP during her doctoral studies, covering personal expenses during the research period, and they did not include direct salaries. CNPq played no additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation. No additional external finding was received for this study.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. 2021;149: 778–789. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71: 209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Braeuer RR, Watson IR, Wu CJ, Mobley AK, Kamiya T, Shoshan E, et al. Why is melanoma so metastatic? Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;27: 19–36. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo W, Wang H, Li C. Signal pathways of melanoma and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6: 424. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00827-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kalaora S, Nagler A, Wargo JA, Samuels Y. Mechanisms of immune activation and regulation: lessons from melanoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22: 195–207. doi: 10.1038/s41568-022-00442-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nguyen K, Hignett E, Khachemoune A. Current and emerging treatment options for metastatic melanoma: a focused review. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26: 13030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Skudalski L, Waldman R, Kerr PE, Grant-Kels JM. Melanoma: an update on systemic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86: 515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.09.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sullivan RJ, Flaherty KT. Major therapeutic developments and current challenges in advanced melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170: 36–44. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chanda M, Cohen MS. Advances in the discovery and development of melanoma drug therapies. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2021;16: 1319–1347. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2021.1942834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ernst M, Giubellino A. The current state of treatment and future directions in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Biomedicines. 2022;10: 822. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10040822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beraldo H, Gambino D. The wide pharmacological versatility of semicarbazones, thiosemicarba-zones and their metal complexes. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2004;4: 31–39. doi: 10.2174/1389557043487484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pelosi G. Cheminform abstract: thiosemicarbazone metal complexes: from structure to activity. ChemInform. 2010;41. doi: 10.1002/chin.201047228 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heffeter P, Pape VFS, Enyedy ÉA, Keppler BK, Szakacs G, Kowol CR. Anticancer thiosemicarbazones: chemical properties, interaction with iron metabolism, and resistance development. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019;30: 1062–1082. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pitucha M, Korga-Plewko A, Czylkowska A, Rogalewicz B, Drozd M, Iwan M, et al. Influence of complexation of thiosemicarbazone derivatives with Cu (II) ions on their antitumor activity against melanoma cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22: 3104. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shakya B, Yadav PN. Thiosemicarbazones as potent anticancer agents and their modes of action. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2020;20: 638–661. doi: 10.2174/1389557519666191029130310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Borba J, Tauhata SBF, Oliveira CMA, Marques MF, Bailão AM, Soares CMA, et al. Chemoproteomic identification of molecular targets of antifungal prototypes, thiosemicarbazide and a camphene derivative of thiosemicarbazide, in paracoccidioides brasiliensis. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0201948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.do Carmo Silva L, Ossa DPT, Castro SVDC, Pires LB, de Oliveira CM, da Silva CC, et al. Transcriptome profile of the response of paracoccidioides spp. To a camphene thiosemicarbazide derivative. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0130703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yamaguchi MU, da Silva APB, Ueda-Nakamura T, Filho BPD, da Silva CC, Nakamura CV. Effects of a thiosemicarbazide camphene derivative on trichophyton mentagrophytes. Molecules. 2009;14: 1796–1807. doi: 10.3390/molecules14051796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Freitas BC, Queiroz PA, Baldin VP, do Amaral PH, Rodrigues LL, Vandresen F, et al. (-)-Camphene-based derivatives as potential antibacterial agents against staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus spp. Future Microbiol. 2020;15: 1527–1534. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2020-0131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Souza MRP, Coelho NP, Baldin VP, Scodro RBL, Cardoso RF, da Silva CC, et al. Synthesis of novel (-)-camphene-based thiosemicarbazones and evaluation of anti-mycobacterium tuberculosis activity. Nat Prod Res. 2019;33: 3372–3377. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1478829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vandresen F, Falzirolli H, Batista SAA, da Silva-Giardini AP, de Oliveira DN, Catharino RR, et al. Novel R-(+)-limonene-based thiosemicarbazones and their antitumor activity against human tumor cell lines. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;79: 110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.03.086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shiku H, Takahashi T, Oettgen HF. Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma. II. Serological typing with immune adherence assays and definition of two new surface antigens. J Exp Med. 1976;144: 873–881. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.4.873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Suriano R, Rajoria S, George AL, Geliebter J, Wallack M, Tiwari RK. Ex vivo derived primary melanoma cells: implications for immunotherapeutic vaccines. J Cancer. 2013;4: 371–382. doi: 10.7150/jca.6625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.da Silva AB. Síntese e atividade antileishmania de benzaldeídotiossemicarbazonas derivadas do (-)-canfeno e do R-(+)-limoneno e dos seus complexos de cobre (II). Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Maringá. 2010. Available from: http://www.pqu.uem.br/Teses-Dissertacoes/teses/defesas-doutorado-2010.
  • 25.Coelho N. Síntese de tiossemicarbazonas aldeídicas e cetônicas. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Maringá. 2011. Available from: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/3904.
  • 26.Vandresen F. Síntese e atividades antileishmania e antitumoral de tiossemicarbazonas e 1,3,3-tiadizóis derivados do R-(+)-limoneno. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Maringá. 2011. Available from: http://www.pqu.uem.br/Teses-Dissertacoes/teses/defesas-doutorado-2011
  • 27.da Silva CC, Almagro V, Marsaioli AJ. A direct route to terpene isothiocyanates. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34: 6717–6720. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Silva C. Uma metodologia eficiente para a síntese de isotiocianoterpenos. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. 1995. Available from https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12733/1582374.
  • 29.Batista SAA, Vandresen F, Falzirolli H, Britta E, de Oliveira DN, Catharino RR, et al. Synthesis and comparison of antileishmanial and cytotoxic activities of S-(−)-limonene benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazones with their R-(+)-analogues. J Mol Struct. 2019;1179: 252–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vieira CR, Marques MF, Soares PR, Matuda L, de Oliveira CM, Kato L, et al. Antiproliferative activity of pterodon pubescens benth. Seed oil and its active principle on human melanoma cells. Phytomedicine. 2008;15: 528–532. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2007.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65: 55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985;150: 76–85. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Majtnerová P, Roušar T. An overview of apoptosis assays detecting DNA fragmentation. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45: 1469–1478. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4258-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stupack DG. Caspase-8 as a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013;332: 133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.07.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25: 486–541. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dogan E, Kara HG, Kosova B, Cetintas VB. Targeting apoptosis to overcome chemotherapy resistance. In: Sergi CM, editor. Metastasis. Brisbane, AU: Exon Publications; 2022. pp 163–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang Y, Wang Z, Kuang H, Zhang Y, Gu W, Zhu Y, et al. Synthesis and antitumor activity of 2-isocamphanyl thiosemicarbazone derivatives via ROS-enhanced mitochondrial damage. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2019;94: 1281–1291. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna

30 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-14168In vitro antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of thiosemicarbazones based on (-)-camphene and R-(+)-limonene in human melanoma cellsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Guillo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 14 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna, Ph.d

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico"

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

One or more authors are affiliated with the funder, but authors state that the funder had no role

Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"Authors  PROS and DCSP were supported by a scholarship from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript "

We note that one or more of the authors is affiliated with the funding organization, indicating the funder may have had some role in the design, data collection, analysis or preparation of your manuscript for publication; in other words, the funder played an indirect role through the participation of the co-authors. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please do the following:

           1. Review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. These amendments should be made in the online form.

          2. Confirm in your cover letter that you agree with the following statement, and we will change the online submission form on your behalf:

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear editor,

Have a nice day. The authors synthesized some thiosemicarbazone derivatives as anticancer agents. The synthesized compounds were evaluated in vitro for their anti-proliferative effect.

The manuscript need extensive modifications as follows.

1- The language of the manuscript should be extensively revised.

2- Some symbols and words should be italic form as heteroatoms of the chemical names and in vitro.

3- Abstract should be more concise.

4- Some words start with capital letters although being in the middle of the sentence. Please, check all manuscript.

5- The introduction section is not comprehensive. It should comprise the background, aim of the work, the problems, and the rational of the work.

6- 1H NMR and 13 C NMR charts should be provided in supplementary data.

7- Fig. 1, 2, 3 have poor resolution.

8- The biological target (receptor or enzyme) should be determined. Then docking studies should be carried out against the target receptor.

Reviewer #2: The work exerted is so appreciated. However, some points need to be addressed. So, a major revision may be required to improve the manuscript.

1- The abstract has to be improved. The abstract should illustrate your work in an attractive way and briefly removing all redundant data.

2- Some typos and grammatical errors need to be corrected.

3- In the introduction part, some short paragraphs need to be united into one paragraph.

4- The overall introduction is too short. Many points have to be discussed in the introduction part such as impact of cancer and its global statistics, attempts for melanoma treatment, literature of compounds bearing thiosemicarbazone for cancer treatment, and so on….

5- “Please note that in the manuscript, all compounds will be highlighted in bold for readability purposes.” Please remove this sentence!

6- “characterized by one of the coauthors”. Please remove this sentence!

7- At lines 377-379 and 459-471, please remove highlights.

8- The resolution of most figures have to be enhanced.

9- The experimental chemistry part of the synthesized compounds along with chemical synthesis procedures should be transferred from supplementary to the main manuscript.

10- Conclusion part have to be improved.

11- Some references have to be updated.

12- Where are the charts of IR, 1HNMR, 13CNMR and mass spectrometry?? They have to be shown in the supplementary material.

13- The work presented is so valued. However, the overall writing pattern of the manuscript has to be improved.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ibrahim Eissa

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0295012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295012.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 Oct 2023

Reviewers #1 and #2: We are pleased to inform you that all the suggested revisions and modifications have been meticulously addressed, and you can find our detailed responses in the file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. Thank you both for dedicating your time and effort in reviewing our work. Your contributions have been invaluable in improving the quality and clarity of our manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna

14 Nov 2023

In vitro antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of thiosemicarbazones based on (-)-camphene and R-(+)-limonene in human melanoma cells

PONE-D-23-14168R1

Dear Dr. Guillo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna, Ph.d

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Dear editor,

Have a nice day. The authors carried out all the requested modifications. Accordingly, I recommend the publication of the manuscript in the current form.

Best regards

Reviewer #2: The paper entitled by "In vitro antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of thiosemicarbazones 1 based on (-)-

2 camphene and R-(+)-limonene in human melanoma cells" can be accepted

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna

20 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-14168R1

In vitro antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of thiosemicarbazones based on (-)-camphene and R-(+)-limonene in human melanoma cells

Dear Dr. Guillo:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Wagdy Mohamed Eldehna

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Structural characterization of new thiosemicarbazone derivatives.

    Structural characterization by 1H and 13C NMR of the new (-)-camphene-based compounds.

    (PDF)

    S2 File. Standardization for the colorimetric enzymatic assay of caspases 2, 3, 6, 8 and 9.

    Optimization of kinetic conditions for the enzymatic reaction of caspases.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw image. Raw electrophoresis gel image.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES