Abstract
Using a combination of both ethyl methanesulfonate and site-directed mutagenesis, we have identified a region in DNA helicase II (UvrD) from Escherichia coli that is required for biological function but lies outside of any of the seven conserved motifs (T. C. Hodgman, Nature 333:22–23, 1988) associated with the superfamily of proteins of which it is a member. Located between amino acids 403 and 409, alterations in the amino acid sequence DDAAFER lead to both temperature-sensitive and dominant uvrD mutations. The uvrD300 (A406T) and uvrD301 (A406V) alleles produce UV sensitivity at 44°C but do not affect sensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). In contrast, the uvrD303 mutation (D403AD404A) causes increased sensitivity to both UV and MMS and is dominant to uvrD+ when present at six to eight copies per cell. Several of the alleles demonstrated a strong antimutator phenotype. In addition, conjugal recombination is reduced 10-fold in uvrD303 strains. Of all of the amino acid substitutions tested, only an alanine-to-serine change at position 406 (uvrD302) was neutral. To determine the biochemical basis for the observed phenotypes, we overexpressed and purified the UvrD303 protein from a uvrDΔ294 deletion background and characterized its enzymatic activities. The highly unusual UvrD303 protein exhibits a higher specific activity for ATP hydrolysis than the wild-type control, while its Km for ATP binding remains unchanged. More importantly, the UvrD303 protein unwinds partial duplex DNA up to 10 times more efficiently than wild-type UvrD. The DNA binding affinities of the two proteins appear comparable. Based on these results, we propose that the region located between amino acids 403 and 409 serves to regulate the unwinding activity of DNA helicase II to provide the proper balance between speed and overall effectiveness in the various DNA repair systems in which the protein participates.
Double-stranded DNA needs to be unwound in order for replication, repair, and recombination to proceed. A class of enzymes, designated DNA helicases, accomplish this task by using the energy of nucleoside 5′-triphosphate hydrolysis to disrupt the hydrogen bonds between the Watson-Crick base pairs of duplex DNA. There are at least 12 helicases in Escherichia coli (24, 25). One of these, DNA helicase II, the product of the uvrD gene, has been demonstrated to play a role in at least two distinct DNA repair pathways: nucleotide excision repair and methyl-directed mismatch repair (29, 39). Analysis of more than a dozen mutant alleles of uvrD has suggested that DNA helicase II may also be involved in homologous recombination and replication (5, 12, 53).
DNA helicase II is a single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase that unwinds double-stranded DNA with a 3′-to-5′ polarity with respect to the DNA strand on which the enzyme initially binds (23). At low protein concentrations, DNA helicase II preferentially unwinds duplex DNA possessing 3′-flanking single-stranded DNA. At much higher concentrations of DNA helicase II, unwinding of blunt-ended or nicked duplex DNA is observed (37). While it has been reported that DNA helicase II is monomeric in solution (1, 35), dimers or oligomers can be formed upon binding DNA (20), and it is proposed that the dimeric helicase is the functionally active form in DNA unwinding (3).
Computer analysis of the uvrD coding sequence has indicated that it contains seven conserved motifs that are shared by a superfamily of proteins involved in DNA metabolism (16). Motifs IA, IB, and II, previously identified as Walker A and Walker B sequences, respectively, are conserved segments found in many nucleoside triphosphate-binding proteins and all helicases characterized to date (14, 15, 46). Mutations within these two motifs of DNA helicase II result in proteins with significantly reduced ATP-binding and/or ATP hydrolysis activity (8, 12, 48). In addition, there is genetic evidence that all of the remaining motifs (III to VI) are also required for the biological functions of DNA helicase II (8–10, 51).
While study of the seven conserved motifs can lead to a better understanding of the universal structure-function relationships among this family of proteins, identification of important regions unique to UvrD could help better explain the specialization among DNA helicases and provide a deeper insight into the specific roles of DNA helicase II in vivo. For example, while DNA helicase II and the Rep helicase share 40% homology at the amino acid level (13), the Rep enzyme works catalytically (4), while the UvrD protein is required in stoichiometric amounts (2, 17).
In this communication, we report the identification of a new region of DNA helicase II that is required for in vivo function. Located between amino acids 403 and 409, mutations in this region lead to both temperature-sensitive and dominant phenotypes. Among the five mutant alleles identified, the substitution of two adjacent aspartic acid residues with alanines (uvrD303) resulted in a dominant negative phenotype for UV and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) sensitivity while exhibiting reduced levels of spontaneous mutagenesis and homologous recombination. The purified UvrD303 protein exhibits a higher specific activity for DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis and unwinds DNA partial duplexes up to 10 times more efficiently than the wild-type DNA helicase II protein. The implications of these results are discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and plasmids.
The E. coli strains used in this work are listed in Table 1. All strains were constructed in this laboratory by bacteriophage P1-mediated transduction (50) or plasmid transformation unless otherwise described. The plasmids used are described in Table 2. The various uvrD genes were inserted into pWSK29 (47), such that they could be transcribed from a bacteriophage T7 promoter.
TABLE 1.
Strains | Genotype (strain/plasmid) | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
SK707 | F−uvrD+ rep+ argH1 hisG4 ilvD188 metE46 lacMS286φ80dIIlacBK1 | 52 |
SK4090 | F−uvrDΔ294::kana rep+ argH1 hisG4 ilvD188 metE46 lacMS286φ80dIIlacBK1 | 51 |
SK9040 | SK4090 transformed with pWSK29 (uvrDΔ294) | This work |
SK9041 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK20 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD+) | This work |
SK9052 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK28 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD300) | This work |
SK9053 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK29 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD301) | This work |
SK9054 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK30 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD302) | This work |
SK9055 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK31 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD303) | This work |
SK9056 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK32 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD304) | This work |
SK9060 | SK707 transformed with pWSK29 (uvrD+) | This work |
SK9061 | SK707 transformed with pGZK20 (uvrD+/uvrD+) | This work |
SK9062 | SK707 transformed with pGZK28 (uvrD+/uvrD300) | This work |
SK9063 | SK707 transformed with pGZK29 (uvrD+/uvrD301) | This work |
SK9064 | SK707 transformed with pGZK30 (uvrD+/uvrD302) | This work |
SK9065 | SK707 transformed with pGZK31 (uvrD+/uvrD303) | This work |
SK9066 | SK707 transformed with pGZK32 (uvrD+/uvrD304) | This work |
SK9067 | SK4090 transformed with pGZK33 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD+) | This work |
SK9070 | SK4090 transformed with pGP1-3 | This work |
SK9071 | SK9071 transformed with pGZK20 | This work |
SK9072 | SK9072 transformed with pGZK31 | This work |
uvrDΔ294::kan is a complete deletion of the uvrD coding sequence replaced by a kan cassette. For the sake of simplicity, it is given in the text as uvrDΔ294.
TABLE 2.
Plasmid | Descriptiona | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
pGP1-3 | Tcr plasmid carrying T7 RNA polymerase gene under λcI857 control | 44 |
pWSK29 | Apr low-copy-number vector | 47 |
pGZK20 | Apr low-copy-number uvrD+ plasmid | uvrD+ cloned in SalI site of pWSK29 |
pGZK28 | ApruvrD300 (A406T) substitution in pGZK20 | Isolated by EMS mutagenesis |
pGZK29 | ApruvrD301 (A406V) substitution in pGZK20 | Site-directed mutagenesis |
pGZK30 | ApruvrD302 (A406S) substitution in pGZK20 | Site-directed mutagenesis |
pGZK31 | ApruvrD303 (D403AD404A) substitution in pGZK20 | Site-directed mutagenesis |
pGZK32 | ApruvrD304 (E408AR409A) substitution in pGZK20 | Site-directed mutagenesis |
pGZK33 | ApruvrD+ (T406A) substitution in pGZK28 | Site-directed mutagenesis |
Mutationally altered uvrD genes were isolated as described in Materials and Methods. The positions of amino acid substitutions are indicated in parentheses.
Media and growth conditions.
Cells were grown in Luria broth (21) unless otherwise described. Ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (20 μg/ml), and chloramphenicol (20 μg/ml) were added when necessary. Agar was added to 2% for solid medium. The minimal medium used for P1 transduction was M56/2 (18) containing 2% agar, glucose, and appropriate amino acids and vitamins. Glucose was replaced with lactose (glucose free; Sigma) for lactose minimal medium.
For assays of temperature-sensitive phenotypes, we used 30 and 44°C as the incubation temperatures. Otherwise, the cells were grown at 37°C.
DNA techniques.
Plasmid DNA was isolated according to the alkaline lysis method (38) for mini-scale preparations. The Qiagen Midikit from Qiagen was used for larger-scale plasmid preparations. Competent cells were prepared and transformed by electroporation (28) with a Gene Pulser manufactured by Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.
Random in vivo mutagenesis was carried out as follows: SK9041[pGZK20 (uvrD+)] was grown to 108 cells per ml in Luria broth followed by the addition of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to 1.5% (vol/vol). Incubation was continued with shaking at 37°C for 2.5 h. Mutagenized plasmid DNA was subsequently extracted and transformed into SK4090 (uvrDΔ294). The transformants were screened by replica plating (11) for UV sensitivity at 30 and 44°C following exposure to 25 J/m2 from a General Electric 15-W germicidal lamp. Among 18,000 transformants screened, we isolated 16 nonconditional UV-sensitive mutants and one conditional UV-sensitive mutant (uvrD300).
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out with the U.S.E. Mutagenesis Kit from Pharmacia Biotech. A 2.9-kb SalI DNA fragment containing the uvrD gene cloned in pWSK29 (47) was the target for site-directed mutagenesis. The oligonucleotide primers used in this work, with the altered codons underlined, were as follows. Oligonucleotide 5′-CACGCTCAAAGGCCGCGTCGTCGTTGC-3′ was used to revert the uvrD300 allele to wild type, oligonucleotide 5′-CACGCTCAAAGACCGCGTCGTCGTTGC-3′ was used to alter codon 406 to generate uvrD301, oligonucleotide 5′-CACGCTCAAAGGACGCGTCGTCGTTGC-3′ was used to alter codon 406 to generate uvrD302, oligonucleotide 5′-CTCAAAGGCCGCGGCGGCGTTGCGGTTG-3′ was used to alter codons 403 and 404 to generate uvrD303, and oligonucleotide 5′-CGTATTCACCACAGCCGCAAAGGCCGCGTC-3′ was used to alter codons 408 and 409 to generate uvrD304.
All of the mutations were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis. Sequencing was performed with the fmol sequencing system from Promega.
Genetic assays.
The UV survival of bacterial strains was measured as described by Zhang et al. (51). MMS sensitivity assays were performed in liquid medium by the method of Siegel (42).
Intrachromosomal recombination was analyzed by measuring the number of lac+ revertant colonies resulting from genetic recombination between two partially deleted lactose operons (lacMS286φ80dIIlacBK1) in the bacterial chromosome (52). Cells were grown to 108 cells per ml in Luria broth and resuspended in M56/2 buffer after being washed twice with the same buffer. Various dilutions were plated on lactose minimal agar plates. Appropriate dilutions were also plated on Luria agar plates to determine the number of viable cells. After 48 h of incubation at 37°C, the numbers of colonies on both sets of plates were counted.
Determination of conjugational recombination frequencies was performed as described by Willetts and Clark (50). SK7712, the Hfr donor, transferred hisG1 early, while the recipient strains carried a hisG4 allele. Following a 50-min mating period, cells were vigorously vortexed, washed and resuspended in M56/2 buffer, and plated onto minimal medium containing the necessary supplements but no histidine. The resulting colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation at 37°C.
Mutation frequencies for the appearance of spectinomycin resistance were determined by the method of Luria and Delbruck (21) employing the modifications of Zhang et al. (51).
DNA and nucleotides.
All unlabeled deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and ATP, adenosine-5′-O-thiotriphosphate, and bacteriophage M13mp19 were from Boehringer Mannheim. Single- and double-stranded M13 phage DNAs were prepared according to the method described by Yanisch-Perron et al. (34). [γ-32P]ATP (6,000 mCi/μmol) and [α-32P]dCTP (3,000 mCi/μmol) were provided by Dupont.
Protein purification.
The UvrD303 and UvrD+ proteins were purified according to the method described by Washburn and Kushner (48) with the following modifications. Six liters of either SK9071 or SK9072 cells was grown at 30°C in Luria-Bertani medium containing 25 μg of kanamycin and 100 μg of ampicillin per ml to an optical density at 595 nm of about 1.5. The T7 RNA polymerase-directed expression of uvrD was induced by a 30-min temperature shift to 42°C. After 90 min of additional incubation with shaking at 37°C, cells were collected by centrifugation and frozen as cell paste at −20°C for storage.
Cells were lysed and treated with 30% (wt/vol) ammonium sulfate for protein precipitation as described by Washburn and Kushner (48). The pellet was subsequently redissolved in 400 ml of buffer AP (20 mM potassium phosphate [pH 7.5], 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 20% [vol/vol] glycerol) as fraction I. Fraction I was applied to a phosphocellulose column (5 by 11 cm [Whatman P11]) equilibrated with buffer AP. After being washed with 500 ml of the same buffer, proteins were eluted with a 0 to 0.5 M NaCl linear gradient (total volume, 500 ml) in buffer AP. Immuno dot blotting and Western blotting were used to detect the uvrD gene product. The peak fractions (0.17 M NaCl) were pooled (fraction II) and dialyzed overnight against 2 liters of buffer P (20 mM potassium phosphate [pH 6.5], 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM PMSF, 20% [vol/vol] glycerol). The dialyzed fraction II was applied to a phosphocellulose column (2.5 by 10 cm [Whatman P11]) preequilibrated with buffer P. The column was washed with 250 ml of buffer P and eluted with a 0.2 to 1.0 M NaCl linear gradient (total volume, 120 ml) in buffer P. Immunoblotting was performed, and the peak fractions (0.6 M NaCl) were pooled (fraction III) and dialyzed against buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM PMSF, 20% [vol/vol] glycerol). The dialyzed fraction III was subsequently applied to a single-stranded DNA agarose column (1.2 by 8 cm [Life Technologies]) and eluted with a 40-ml NaCl linear gradient (0.2 to 1.0 M). The peak fractions (0.6 M NaCl), detected by immunoblotting, were pooled, dialyzed against buffer A containing 50% glycerol, and stored at −20°C (fraction IV). The columns were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Both the UvrD+ and UvrD303 proteins were stable during the process of purification. Protein concentrations were determined with the Bradford assay (7) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Immunological methods.
For immuno dot blotting, 200 to 400 μl of each fraction was vacuum blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride Immobilon-P transfer membranes (Millipore) with a Schleicher & Schuell dot blotter. For Western blotting, 15 μl of each fraction was applied to a 10% polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, the proteins in the gel were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride transfer membranes as described previously (32). The membranes were probed with anti-UvrD antibodies (48) and developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting kit from Amersham Life Science. Western blot analysis of the UvrD protein in various mutant strains was carried out as described by Zhang et al. (51).
DNA-dependent ATPase assays.
The hydrolysis of ATP to ADP was measured as previously described (19). The standard ATPase reaction mixture (75 μl) contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 3 mM MgCl2, 15 μg of bovine serum albumin, 2.5 μg of heat-denatured calf thymus DNA, [γ-32P]ATP (2 × 104 to 10 × 104 cpm/reaction) and UvrD protein as indicated. For kcat determinations, the ATP concentration was 500 μM. For Km determinations, the ATP concentration ranged from 2 to 100 μM.
DNA helicase substrate preparation.
DNA helicase substrates consisted of single-stranded M13mp19 DNA to which 32P-labeled fragments of various sizes were annealed. The 24-nucleotide oligomer was an M13/pUC forward primer supplied by Promega. It was end labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase (Boehringer Mannheim) and [γ-32P]ATP and annealed to M13 single-stranded DNA as previously described (48).
The 96- and 448-bp fragments were obtained by digestion of double-stranded M13mp19 DNA with the restriction enzyme PvuII. After electrophoresis, the DNA fragments were recovered from a 1.5% agarose gel, annealed to M13 DNA, and labeled with Klenow DNA polymerase and [α-32P]dCTP as described by Matson (23). Unreacted radioactive nucleotide and the complementary strand of the restriction fragment were removed by gel filtration through a 1.5-ml Sepharose 6B-CL column equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)–0.2 mM EDTA–50 mM NaCl. The void volume was used directly in the helicase assays. The 346-bp blunt-ended full duplex substrate was constructed as previously described (12).
DNA helicase assays.
The helicase assays measured either the displacement of a 32P-labeled DNA fragment from a single-stranded circular partial duplex or the denaturation of a full duplex 32P-labeled DNA fragment by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Reaction mixtures (20 μl) contained 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 μg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 3 mM ATP, and approximately 2 μM DNA substrate (for assays with the 346-bp full duplex DNA fragment, the substrate was approximately 0.5 μM). Reactions were carried out at 37°C for 10 min and terminated by addition of 10 μl of stop solution (50 mM EDTA, 40% glycerol, 0.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 0.03% bromphenol blue). The reaction mixtures were loaded onto 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. To quantitate unwinding levels, the gels were exposed to X-ray films, which were then scanned on a Molecular Dynamics scanning densitometer. The percentage of unwinding was calculated by the formula [(U − C)/(B − C)] × 100, where U is the intensity (scan units) of the band produced by the unwinding reaction, C is the amount (scan units) of unwound DNA in the absence of the enzyme, and B is the amount (scan units) of unwound DNA produced by heating the reaction mixture at 95°C for 8 min before loading the gel.
DNA-binding assay.
A nitrocellulose filter-binding assay was used to measure binding of the UvrD proteins to DNA (26). The binding reaction mixture was identical to the helicase assay reaction mixture, except the ATP was replaced with 3 mM γ-S–ATP. The DNA substrate was the 448-bp partial duplex as described above. The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 10 min, followed by dilution with 1 ml of prewarmed buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 μg of bovine serum albumin per ml). The reaction mixtures were then passed through nitrocellulose filters (Whatman [0.45-μm pore diameter]). The filters were subsequently washed three times with 1× 3 ml of reaction buffer before drying. The dried filters were counted in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman). Background radioactivity was subtracted from the total radioactivity measured.
RESULTS
Identification of a new temperature-sensitive uvrD mutation.
Historically, the isolation and characterization of temperature-sensitive alleles in the structural gene of a protein involved in multiple pathways has proven useful as a means of helping understand its function. With DNA helicase II playing important roles in excision repair, mismatch repair, and genetic recombination, the uvrD gene is a perfect candidate for such an approach. However, although Richet et al. (36) isolated a DNA helicase II protein with temperature-sensitive ATPase activity in vitro, it demonstrated no in vivo phenotype.
Accordingly, we have sought for some time to isolate and characterize new temperature-sensitive uvrD alleles by a variety of genetic approaches. As described in Materials and Methods, here we used EMS mutagenesis on a low-copy-number plasmid carrying the uvrD+ gene to generate potential temperature-sensitive uvrD alleles. After searching through 18,000 individual colonies carrying mutagenized uvrD plasmids, we isolated a mutant allele (uvrD300) which led to increased UV sensitivity at 44°C. In a host strain with a complete chromosomal deletion of the uvrD coding sequence [SK4090 (uvrDΔ294)], the UV survival rate of the uvrD300 mutant decreased significantly at 44°C (Fig. 1). However, the uvrD300 allele did not fully complement uvrDΔ294 at 30°C (Fig. 1). In contrast, the presence of the uvrD+ allele on the same low-copy-number plasmid led to a small increase in UV resistance at 44°C (Fig. 1). To our surprise, when plasmid pGZK28 (uvrD300) was transformed into SK707 (uvrD+), we again observed UV sensitivity at both 30 and 44°C (Fig. 1). In fact, at 44°C, the UV sensitivities of SK9052 (uvrDΔ294/uvrD300 [strain/plasmid]) and SK9062 (uvrD+/uvrD300) were strikingly close.
DNA sequence analysis of the complete uvrD gene in pGZK28 revealed a single G-to-A change in the coding region, resulting in the substitution of alanine with threonine at amino acid 406 (A406T). When we subsequently reverted the A to G by using site-directed mutagenesis, the UV sensitivity of the strain carrying pGZK33 was identical to that observed with SK9041(pGZK20 [Fig. 1]).
Identification of a new region required for normal in vivo DNA helicase II function.
After determining the exact location of the uvrD300 allele, we realized that it was not located within any of the seven previously identified conserved motifs (16) (Fig. 2). Interestingly, however, we noticed that there were four charged amino acids flanking the alanine (position 406) residue (DDAAFER [Fig. 2]). To determine if these charged amino acids were important for normal biological function, we used the approach of Bennett et al. (6) to change the two aspartic acids to alanine to create uvrD303 and the glutamic acid and arginine residues to alanine to generate uvrD304. In addition, we made two additional substitutions of valine (uvrD301) and serine (uvrD302) at position 406 (Fig. 2). As judged by Western blot analysis, all of the mutant alleles produced stable UvrD protein in amounts comparable to those of a wild-type control (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the uvrD302, uvrD303, and uvrD304 alleles led to small changes in the electrophoretic mobility of the full-length protein (Fig. 3).
The uvrD301 allele (A406V) also exhibited temperature sensitivity to UV irradiation in the uvrDΔ294 genetic background (Fig. 4), but consistently resulted in less UV sensitivity than uvrD300 (Fig. 1). The uvrD302 allele, on the other hand, appeared to be a neutral mutation (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the uvrD303 and uvrD304 alleles showed various levels of increased UV sensitivity (Fig. 5A), which were not affected by temperature (data not shown). The uvrD303 strain was almost as UV sensitive as a uvrDΔ294 control (Fig. 5A).
We also investigated the possibility of phenotypic dominance of these mutations by transforming them into SK707, which carried the wild-type uvrD allele on the chromosome. Of the five alleles tested, uvrD300, uvrD301, and uvrD303 were clearly dominant to the wild-type gene when present in six to eight copies per cell (Fig. 1, 4, and 5B). In contrast, six to eight copies of the wild-type gene did not cause any significant increase in UV sensitivity (Fig. 5B).
MMS sensitivity.
Previous studies have shown that the DNA lesions caused by alkylating agents like MMS can be repaired by a pathway that somehow involves DNA helicase II. These mutations in uvrD can result in moderate (uvrDΔ288 [49] and uvrD252 [48]) or strong (uvrD3 [43]) MMS sensitivity. To assess the effect of our new uvrD mutations in this regard, we measured the viability of the strains harboring each of these mutant uvrD alleles in the presence of MMS (Fig. 6). Interestingly, although uvrD300 and uvrD301 were temperature sensitive in the UV sensitivity assay (Fig. 1 and 4), their MMS sensitivity was temperature independent (data not shown) and was similar to that of a uvrDΔ294/uvrD+ control (Fig. 6).
As previously reported for more limited deletions of the uvrD coding sequence (49), the uvrDΔ294 strain (SK9040) exhibited an increase in MMS sensitivity (Fig. 6). However, the presence of the uvrD303 allele in the uvrDΔ294 genetic background significantly increased the MMS sensitivity (Fig. 6). This result is in contrast to those of the UV sensitivity tests, in which the presence of uvrD303 in the uvrDΔ294 background led to slightly decreased resistance (Fig. 5A). In addition, when pGZK31 (uvrD303) was transformed into SK707 (uvrD+), the MMS sensitivity of the resulting strain (SK9065) was also greater than that of the uvrDΔ294 strain (Fig. 6).
Spontaneous mutation frequencies.
DNA helicase II is known to be required in the methyl-directed DNA mismatch repair pathway (29). Its functional inactivation results in increased frequencies of spontaneous mutagenesis (49). However, although most of the previously reported uvrD alleles result in increased UV sensitivity, the uvrD3 and uvrD252 alleles do not increase spontaneous mutation rates (43, 48). These observations suggest that DNA helicase II might play different roles in mismatch repair versus excision repair. Since our new uvrD alleles displayed interesting phenotypes regarding excision repair (Fig. 1, 4, and 5), we also tested the effect of these mutants on the mismatch repair pathway. As a test for increased levels of spontaneous mutagenesis, we measured the appearance of spectinomycin-resistant cells, as described in Materials and Methods. In agreement with previous results with partial deletion mutants (49), the complete deletion of the uvrD coding sequence (uvrDΔ294) resulted in an almost 250-fold increase in spontaneous mutations (Table 3). Of the five new alleles tested, uvrD300 and uvrD302 were neutral, while uvrD301, uvrD303, and uvrD304 led to 5- to 10-fold reductions in mutation frequencies, suggesting a strong antimutator effect for these alleles.
TABLE 3.
Strain | Genotype | Mutation frequency (10−10)a | Relative mutabilityb |
---|---|---|---|
SK707 | uvrD+ | 1.9 ± 1.1 | 1.0 |
SK9040 | uvrDΔ294/pWSK29 | 490 ± 230 | 258 |
SK9041 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK20 (uvrD+) | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0.7 |
SK9052 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK28 (uvrD300) | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 1.3 |
SK9053 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK29 (uvrD301) | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.2 |
SK9054 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK30 (uvrD302) | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 1.0 |
SK9055 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK31 (uvrD303) | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.2 |
SK9056 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK32 (uvrD304) | 0.27 ± 0.13 | 0.1 |
Mutation frequencies for spectinomycin resistance were calculated by dividing the number of colonies growing on each spectinomycin plate by the number of total cells originally applied to the plate. The data are presented as the average of three independent experiments. All experiments were performed at 37°C as described in Materials and Methods. The viabilities of all the strains tested were identical within the experimental error.
Relative mutability was calculated by comparing the average mutation frequency with that of strain SK707 (uvrD+).
Homologous recombination.
Beyond its well-documented roles in DNA repair pathways, uvrD has also been implicated in homologous recombination by a series of genetic and biochemical studies (5, 22, 27, 30). A uvrD null mutant exhibited a hyperrecombination phenotype (49), which fit the hypothesized role of DNA helicase II in the proposed antirecombinase model (33, 34). However, the details of UvrD function in this process have not been well defined. Moreover, at least one uvrD allele (uvrD3) showed no effect on recombination frequency, although it severely inhibited excision repair (53).
It was therefore of interest to determine if our newly isolated mutant alleles affected recombination rates. We employed two different systems to measure homologous recombination. One was to test conjugational recombination by using genetic markers transferred from an Hfr strain (50). The other was to measure the appearance of lac+ recombinants formed by intrachromosomal recombination between two partially deleted lactose operons (52). The results, summarized in Tables 4 and 5, indicate that these mutations do not increase homologous recombination in the cells when present at six to eight copies per cell. In fact, the uvrD303 allele led to a 10-fold reduction in conjugal recombination (Table 4) and a 2-fold decrease in intrachromosomal recombination (Table 5).
TABLE 4.
Strains | Genotype | No. of his+ recombinants/ml | Relative recombination proficiencya |
---|---|---|---|
SK707 | uvrD+ | (5.1 ± 0.7) × 103 | 1.0 |
SK9040 | uvrDΔ294/pWSK29 | (8.5 ± 0.7) × 104 | 16.9 |
SK9041 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK20 (uvrD+) | (3.0 ± 0.7) × 103 | 0.6 |
SK9052 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK28 (uvrD300) | (1.5 ± 0.1) × 103 | 0.3 |
SK9053 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK29 (uvrD301) | (1.3 ± 0.3) × 103 | 0.3 |
SK9054 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK30 (uvrD302) | (2.9 ± 0.5) × 103 | 0.6 |
SK9055 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK31 (uvrD303) | (0.5 ± 0.4) × 103 | 0.1 |
SK9056 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK32 (uvrD304) | (2.4 ± 0.7) × 103 | 0.5 |
Recombination assays were performed at 37°C as described in Materials and Methods. Relative recombination proficiency is determined as the recombination frequency divided by that of SK707 (uvrD+). Data represent the average of three independent experiments. The viabilities of all of the strains tested were identical within the experimental error.
TABLE 5.
Strain | Genotype | No. of lac+ recombinants/plate | Relative recombination proficiencya |
---|---|---|---|
SK707 | uvrD+ | 76 ± 10 | 1.0 |
SK9040 | uvrDΔ294/pWSK29 | 502 ± 35 | 6.4 |
SK9041 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK20 (uvrD+) | 96 ± 16 | 1.2 |
SK9052 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK28 (uvrD300) | 70 ± 14 | 0.9 |
SK9053 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK29 (uvrD301) | 84 ± 18 | 1.1 |
SK9054 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK30 (uvrD302) | 108 ± 24 | 1.4 |
SK9055 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK31 (uvrD303) | 42 ± 16 | 0.5 |
SK9056 | uvrDΔ294/pGZK32 (uvrD304) | 50 ± 19 | 0.6 |
Recombination tests were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Equal amounts of cells for each strain were plated (approximately 107 cells/plate) on lactose minimal plates. All experiments were conducted at 37°C. The viabilities of all of the strains tested were identical within the experimental error.
Purification of UvrD+ and UvrD303 proteins.
A 2.9-kb SalI DNA fragment containing either the wild-type uvrD gene or uvrD303 was cloned into a low-copy-number vector, pWSK29 (47), to generate plasmids pGZK20 and pGZK31 (Table 2). The direction of the insertion was selected so that the uvrD gene was under the control of a bacteriophage T7 promoter from the vector. For purposes of protein amplification, a uvrDΔ294::kan strain (51) containing the plasmid carrying T7 RNA polymerase under the control of λc1857 (pGP1-3) was transformed with either pGZK20 (uvrD+) or pGZK31 (uvrD303). The cells were grown as described in Materials and Methods. Following a 30-min induction at 42°C, the cells were incubated for another 90 min with shaking at 37°C prior to harvesting. The UvrD+ and UvrD303 proteins were purified to greater than 95% homogeneity based on silver staining (Fig. 7), as described in Materials and Methods. Both the wild-type and mutant proteins were detected on the basis of immunoreactivity during the purification process. Interestingly, the purified UvrD303 protein migrated slightly slower in the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 7). This result confirmed a similar observation made in crude extracts (Fig. 3). The purified UvrD303 protein was stable for up to 6 months under the storage conditions described above.
ATPase activity.
The ATPase assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. For specific activity determinations, the ATP concentration was 500 μM and the UvrD protein concentration ranged between 0.2 and 20 nM. For Km determinations, the ATP concentration ranged between 20 and 500 μM and the UvrD concentration was 1.1 nM. The non-DNA-dependent ATPase activity was typically less than 5% and was subtracted from the total measurement. As shown in Table 6, the kcat for ATP hydrolysis by the UvrD303 mutant protein was approximately 129 (s−1), a 60% increase compared with the result for wild-type protein, which had a kcat value of 81 (s−1). In contrast, there was no significant difference for the Km values between the two proteins (Table 6), indicating that the nucleotide binding ability was not affected by the mutation. The specific activity (656 U/μg) and Km (55 μM) of the wild-type UvrD were in excellent agreement with previous reports (48).
TABLE 6.
Enzyme | Sp act (U/μg)a | kcat (s−1) | Km (μM) |
---|---|---|---|
UvrD+ | 656 ± 29 | 81 ± 4 | 55 ± 5 |
UvrD303 | 888 ± 71 | 129 ± 11 | 59 ± 8 |
The unit for specific activity is defined as the amount of protein hydrolyzing 1 nmol of ATP in 10 min at 37°C.
DNA helicase activity.
We subsequently compared the unwinding activity of the UvrD303 and UvrD+ proteins by using various partially duplex DNA molecules. The DNA substrates, prepared by annealing of radiolabeled complementary single-stranded DNA oligomers to single-stranded covalently closed M13 DNA as described in Materials and Methods, were incubated with either UvrD+ or UvrD303 proteins. Subsequently the reaction mixtures were separated on 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 8). Under the conditions specified in Materials and Methods, 0.58 ng (0.36 nM) of wild-type UvrD protein was required to produce 50% unwinding of a 24-bp duplex, while only 0.17 ng (0.10 nM) of UvrD303 protein was needed to achieve the same level of unwinding (Fig. 9A).
The enhanced unwinding activity of the UvrD303 protein was also observed with 96- and 448-bp DNA partial duplexes (Fig. 9B and C). Of particular interest was the fact that for the longer substrates, the UvrD303 protein exhibited a higher increase in unwinding activity relative to the wild-type protein. For instance, it required 1.6 ng (1.0 nM) of UvrD303 to unwind 50% of the 96-bp partial duplex substrate, while 13 ng (8.1 nM) of UvrD+ protein was required to unwind the same amount of DNA substrate (Fig. 9B). With the 448-bp partial duplex DNA, 50% unwinding required 6.1 ng (3.8 nM) of UvrD303 versus 60 ng (38 nM) of UvrD+ (Fig. 9C). These data indicated that the UvrD303 protein unwound partial duplex DNA up to 10 times more efficiently than the wild-type UvrD enzyme.
Previous work has shown that at higher UvrD protein concentrations, blunt-ended duplex DNA can be unwound (37). Employing a 346-bp blunt-ended duplex DNA molecule (12), we observed that both the wild-type UvrD and UvrD303 proteins were able to initiate unwinding of the substrate. It required 24 ng (15 nM) of UvrD303 protein to achieve 10% unwinding, while 122 ng (75 nM) of wild-type protein was required for the same effect (data not shown).
UvrD303 retains DNA-binding ability.
Since the UvrD303 protein exhibited both higher ATPase and helicase activities than wild-type UvrD, the increased UV and MMS sensitivity observed in strains carrying uvrD303 (Fig. 5 and 6) could not be explained simply by the loss of DNA helicase II activity. However, the deficiency in excision repair in uvrD303 strains could possibly be the result of altered DNA-binding affinity. If the mutant protein fails to bind to the DNA substrate, it will not be able to carry out its function to unwind DNA and turn over UvrC protein. Alternatively, if the mutant protein binds at the damage site with exceptionally high affinity, it may physically interfere with the access of DNA polymerase I or DNA ligase to the substrate. Either way, the excision repair process could be aborted. To address these possibilities, we conducted a nitrocellulose filter-binding assay to compare the binding of the two proteins to a partial-duplex DNA substrate. The reaction was carried out as described in Materials and Methods. The results, shown in Fig. 10, demonstrate similar overall DNA binding characteristics for the wild-type and UvrD303 proteins.
DISCUSSION
uvrD, the gene encoding DNA helicase II in E. coli, is involved in multiple DNA metabolic pathways, including excision repair, mismatch repair, and homologous recombination. Consequently, it has not been surprising that the phenotypes of various uvrD alleles have sometimes differed (41, 43). Isolation and characterization of new uvrD alleles with distinct phenotypes can help to dissect the biological function of the UvrD protein in each pathway and to further understanding of its role in vivo.
Here we have used random mutagenesis in the uvrD coding region to generate a mutation resulting in a temperature-sensitive phenotype for UV survival. The location of the mutation site (A406T) was of considerable interest, because it did not fall into any of the seven conserved motifs described by Hodgman (16) (Fig. 2). When we introduced other amino acid substitutions in the region of amino acids 403 to 409, we generated a series of alleles that exhibited a range of phenotypes (Fig. 1 and 4 to 6 and Tables 3 to 5) distinct from that of a uvrD null mutation, and from most of the other previously characterized uvrD alleles. All of the mutants produced stable UvrD protein (Fig. 3).
The first distinctive feature of mutations in this region is that they exhibit differential UV sensitivities, and all of them except uvrD302 (A406S) are dominant to the uvrD+ allele when present at six to eight copies per cell (Fig. 1, 4, and 5). Interestingly, although they exhibited various levels of UV sensitivity (Fig. 1, 4, and 5), they showed no significant change in sensitivity to MMS, with the exception of uvrD303 (D403AD404A). In this case, MMS sensitivity was more pronounced than that of uvrD deletion strains (Fig. 6). The exceptionally strong increase in MMS sensitivity associated with uvrD303 suggests that a gain of function, rather than protein interaction, could be responsible for this unusual phenomenon.
Another feature of these mutations is that they seem to retain the biological activity required for successful mismatch repair. Their normal or even lower spontaneous mutation frequency compared to that of the wild-type strain (Table 3) demonstrates that none of them can be classified as mutator, a phenotype which is associated with ΔuvrD and most other uvrD alleles (41–43, 49). In fact, the uvrD301, uvrD303, and uvrD304 alleles all showed a strong antimutator phenotype, with 5- to 10-fold reductions in spontaneous mutation frequency for spectinomycin resistance (Table 3). Although it remains to be tested whether this kind of decrease in mutation frequency can be observed at other genetic loci, the results clearly suggest that the mutant proteins may increase the efficiency of mismatch repair.
Equally striking, the mutants we describe here showed no hyperrecombination phenotype. In fact, some of the mutants had significantly lower recombination frequencies than that of a uvrD+ strain (Tables 4 and 5). It has been proposed that the methyl-directed mismatch repair system functions as an antirecombinase (33), causing recombination to be aborted if the invading strand contains mismatches (34). Thus, a dysfunctional mismatch repair system caused by defective UvrD results in not only increased spontaneous mutagenesis, but also an increase in the frequency of homologous recombination, which is observed in most uvrD mutant strains (5, 49, 51). In other words, there is a correlation between a mutator phenotype and an increased level of genetic recombination in uvrD mutants. Our results support this hypothesis from the opposite perspective. Namely, if a uvrD mutation does not impair mismatch repair, it also has no effect on DNA homologous recombination. Furthermore, the observation of antimutator and hyporecombination phenotypes for the uvrD303 and uvrD304 alleles (Tables 4 and 5) suggests that these two mutant proteins lead to an increased efficiency of the mismatch repair pathway, and consequently a reduction in homologous recombination.
The purification of the UvrD303 mutant protein has enabled us to quantitatively characterize its enzymatic properties and deduce the effect of the mutation on its biological functions. What is truly remarkable about the UvrD303 protein is that it actually is both a better ATPase and a better helicase than the wild-type UvrD control. Increased efficiency of unwinding (up to 10-fold) becomes more apparent with longer substrates (Fig. 9) and is even observed with blunt-ended DNA substrates. Furthermore, the data described here provide biochemical support that this region (amino acids 403 to 409) represents a unique feature of DNA helicase II that is critical for both helicase and ATPase activities. This portion of the protein may play some type of regulatory role in maintaining a balance between the unwinding efficiency of the protein versus the optimization of the complex systems (excision repair and mismatch repair) in which it participates.
For most uvrD mutants, increased UV sensitivity can be easily explained by the impairment of the excision repair pathway caused by the loss or reduced ATPase or helicase activity associated with the mutant proteins. We initially thought the same explanation would apply to the uvrD303 allele, which exhibits a significant increase in UV and MMS sensitivity (Fig. 5 and 6). Since UvrD proteins are thought to usually function as dimers (12), the apparent dominance of the mutant allele could result from forming nonfunctional heteromultimers. However, the characterization of UvrD303 protein indicates that it is a hyperactive enzyme, with both enhanced ATPase and helicase activities (Table 6 and Fig. 9). These results effectively rule out the possibility that the observed phenotype arises from the formation of nonfunctional heteromultimers. What are possible hypotheses to explain the increase in UV and MMS sensitivity associated with the uvrD303 allele?
It should be noted that most models of DNA excision repair in E. coli propose that DNA helicase II is only required in the postincision step (39). The suggested function for DNA helicase II is to remove the incised DNA oligomer and turn over the UvrB and UvrC proteins. It has been reported that DNA helicase II alone is enough to release the photoproduct-containing oligonucleotide and the UvrC protein, while DNA polymerase I is necessary to begin resynthesis and turn over the UvrB protein (31). Although there is some disagreement about the details of these reactions, it is generally accepted that under physiological conditions, the concerted action of DNA helicase II and DNA polymerase I accomplishes the turnover reaction. Proper protein-protein interactions may be required to coordinate the process. Thus, it is possible that the blocking of essential intermolecular interactions involving DNA helicase II could lead to a failure of the concerted reaction, even when the enzyme’s catalytic activities remain intact. Given the empirical notion that clustered charged amino acids tend to reside on the protein surface as part of possible functional domains, the two neighboring aspartic acids (D403 and D404) could represent an essential part of a UvrD protein-protein interaction site.
However, the elevated helicase activity associated with the UvrD303 protein raises a possible alternative explanation. Previous studies of the length of repair patches have shown that excision repair is achieved with minimal nick translation (40, 45). Since the elongation rate of DNA polymerase I is very slow, increasing the unwinding efficiency of DNA helicase II could uncouple the repair synthesis reaction. Alternatively, the conformation of the incised DNA substrate could be changed by aberrant unwinding, so that it is not recognized by the repair machinery. Additional experiments will be necessary to test these hypotheses.
Of particular interest is the fact that the uvrD303 allele actually decreased the frequency of both spontaneous mutagenesis and genetic recombination (48), contrary to most other uvrD alleles, including uvrD deletion alleles (8, 10, 42, 43, 49, 51). This observation suggests that UvrD303 may increase the efficiency of mismatch repair, which is at odds with its effect on excision repair. However, although the unwinding activity of DNA helicase II is presumed to be required in both excision repair and mismatch repair pathways, the other proteins involved in these two processes are different. For example, DNA polymerase III, which is responsible for DNA resynthesis in mismatch repair, is much faster and more processive than DNA polymerase I and should be capable of keeping up with the rapid unwinding associated with UvrD303 protein. In addition, the MutS and MutL proteins, which remain bound at the mismatch site and have unknown function after the incision step (29), might be able to prevent the overunwinding of UvrD303. Consequently, the higher efficiency of mismatch repair observed in uvrD303 strains (Table 3) could arise from the increased rate of displacement of the incised DNA strand from the GATC site to the actual mismatch.
Although the precise role of UvrD in homologous genetic recombination is not yet defined, it has been proposed that the methyl-directed mismatch repair system acts as an antirecombinase, causing recombination to be aborted if the invading strand contains mismatches (33, 34). In this process, the unwinding activity of DNA helicase II is required for uncoupling the invading strand. This model is supported by the fact that the elimination of DNA helicase II protein or its enzymatic activity results in elevated spontaneous mutation and recombination frequencies within the cell (49). Our results support the antirecombinase model by showing that enhanced unwinding efficiency leads to reduced levels of both spontaneous mutagenesis and homologous recombination.
In conclusion, the use of both random and site-directed mutagenesis has revealed a new region in the uvrD coding sequence that is unique to this helicase and is required for normal biological function. Mutations in amino acids 403 to 409 exhibit distinctive phenotypes that are different from the properties associated with most uvrD mutant alleles. Since DNA helicase II is involved in multiple pathways of DNA metabolism, mutations in uvrD usually generate pleiotropic phenotypes that are difficult to interpret. Isolation of uvrD mutants such as these can facilitate the dissection of functions of DNA helicase II, as well as the elucidation of the specific role it plays in each pathway. The results obtained with the mutants we describe here suggest that there are different UvrD functions required in excision repair and mismatch repair.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Stanley Tabor for his generous gift of plasmid pGP1-3, Valerie F. Maples for helpful technical advice, Caroline Ingle and Eileen O’Hara for critically reading the manuscript, and members of this laboratory for stimulating discussions.
This work was partly supported by NIH grants (GM27997 and GM28760) to S.R.K.
REFERENCES
- 1.Abdel-Monem M, Chanal M-C, Hoffman-Berling H. DNA unwinding enzyme II of Escherichia coli. 1. Purification and characterization of the ATPase activity. Eur J Biochem. 1977;79:33–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abdel-Monem M, Durwald H, Hoffman-Berling H. DNA unwinding enzyme II of Escherichia coli. 2. Characterization of the DNA unwinding activity. Eur J Biochem. 1977;79:39–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11781.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ali J A, Lohman T M. Kinetic measurement of the step size of DNA unwinding by Escherichia coli UvrD helicase. Science. 1997;275:377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arai N, Kornberg A. Rep protein as a helicase in an active, isolatable replication fork of duplex φX174 DNA. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:5294–5298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arthur H M, Lloyd R G. Hyper-recombination in uvrD mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Gen Genet. 1980;180:185–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00267368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bennett W F, Paoni N F, Keyt B A, Botstein D, Jones A J, Presta L, Wurm F M, Zoller M J. High resolution analysis of functional determinants on human tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:5191–5201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brosh R M, Jr, Matson S W. Mutations in motif II of Escherichia coli DNA helicase II render the enzyme nonfunctional in both mismatch repair and excision repair with differential effects on the unwinding reaction. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:5612–5621. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.19.5612-5621.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brosh R M, Jr, Matson S W. A partially functional DNA helicase II mutant defective in forming stable binary complexes with ATP and DNA. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:25360–25368. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brosh R M, Jr, Matson S W. A point mutation in Escherichia coli DNA helicase II renders the enzyme nonfunctional in two DNA repair pathways. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:572–579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.1.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clark A J, Margulies A D. Isolation and characterization of recombination-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1965;53:451–459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.2.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.George J W, Brosh R M, Matson S W. A dominant negative allele of the Escherichia coli uvrD gene encoding DNA helicase II. A biochemical and genetic characterization. J Mol Biol. 1994;235:424–435. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gilchrist C A, Denhardt D T. Escherichia coli rep gene: sequence of the gene, the encoded helicase, and its homology with uvrD. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:465–475. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.2.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gorbalenya A E, Koonin E V. Superfamily of UvrA-related NTP-binding proteins: implications for rational classification of repair/recombination systems. J Mol Biol. 1990;213:583–591. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gorbalenya A E, Koonin E V, Donchenko A P, Blinov V M. A novel superfamily of nucleoside triphosphate-binding motif containing proteins which are probably involved in duplex unwinding in DNA and RNA replication and recombination. FEBS Lett. 1988;235:16–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81226-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hodgman T C. A new superfamily of replicative proteins. Nature. 1988;333:22–23. doi: 10.1038/333022b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kuhn B, Abeld-Monem M, Krell H, Hoffman-Berling H. Evidence for two mechanisms for DNA unwinding catalyzed by DNA helicases. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:11343–11350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kushner S R. In vivo studies of temperature-sensitive recB and recC mutants. J Bacteriol. 1974;120:1213–1218. doi: 10.1128/jb.120.3.1213-1218.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kushner S R, Maples V F. Purification and properties of the UvrD helicase. In: Friedberg E C, Hanawalt P C, editors. DNA repair: a laboratory manual. Vol. 3. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1988. pp. 509–527. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lohman T M, Bjornson K P. Mechanisms of helicase-catalyzed DNA unwinding. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:169–214. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.001125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Luria S E, Delbruck M. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics. 1943;28:491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Maples V F, Kushner S R. DNA repair in Escherichia coli: identification of the uvrD gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:5616–5620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matson S W. Escherichia coli DNA helicase II (uvrD gene product) translocates unidirectionally in a 3′ to 5′ direction. J Biol Chem. 1986;262:10169–10175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Matson S W, Bean D W, George J W. DNA helicases: enzymes with essential roles in all aspects of DNA metabolism. Bioessays. 1994;16:13–22. doi: 10.1002/bies.950160103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matson S W, Kaiser-Rogers K A. DNA helicases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:289–329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.001445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Matson S W, Richardson C C. Nucleotide-dependent binding of the gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7 to single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:2281–2287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mendonca V M, Kaiser-Rogers K, Matson S W. Double helicase II (uvrD)-helicase IV (helD) deletion mutants are defective in the recombination pathways of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:4641–4651. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.15.4641-4651.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miller, J. F. 1988. Bacterial electroporation. Bio-Rad Lab. Rep. 5.
- 29.Modrich P. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Morel P, Hejna J A, Ehrlich S D, Cassuto E. Antipairing and strand transferase activities of E. coli helicase II (UvrD) Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:3205–3209. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.14.3205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Orren D K, Selby C P, Hearst J E, Sancar A. Postincision steps of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Disassembly of the UvrBD-DNA complex by helicase II and DNA polymerase I. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:780–788. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Peluso R W, Rosenberg G H. Quantitative electrotransfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels onto positively charged nylon membranes. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:389–398. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90409-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Radman M. Mismatch repair and genetic recombination. In: Kucherlapati R, Smith G R, editors. Genetic recombination. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1988. pp. 169–192. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rayssingyier C, Thaler D S, Radman M. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature. 1989;342:396–401. doi: 10.1038/342396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Richet E, Kohiyama M. Purification and characterization of a DNA-dependent ATPase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1976;251:808–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Richet E, Nishimura Y, Hirota Y, Kohiyama M. Escherichia coli uvrD mutants with thermosensitive DNA-dependent adenosine triphosphatase I (helicase II) Mol Gen Genet. 1983;192:378–385. doi: 10.1007/BF00392178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Runyon G T, Bear D G, Lohman T M. Escherichia coli helicase II (uvrD) protein initiates DNA unwinding at nicks and blunt ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:6383–6387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sancar A. Mechanisms of DNA excision repair. Science. 1994;266:1954–1956. doi: 10.1126/science.7801120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sibghat-Ullah A, Sancar A, Hearst J E. The repair patch of E. coli (A)BC exinuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:5051–5053. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.17.5051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Siegel E C. Complementation studies with the repair-deficient uvrD3, uvrE156 and recL152 mutations in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;184:526–530. doi: 10.1007/BF00352533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Siegel E C. Ultraviolet-sensitive mutator strain of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1973;113:145–160. doi: 10.1128/jb.113.1.145-160.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Siegel E C, Race H. Phenotypes of UV-sensitive uvrD3, recL152, and uvrD156 mutants of Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 1981;83:49–59. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(81)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tabor S, Richardson C C. A bacteriophage T7 polymerase/promoter system for controlled exclusive expression of specific genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:1074–1078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.4.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Van Houten B, Gamper H, Hearst J E, Sancar A. Analysis of sequential steps of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli using synthetic substrates containing single psoralen adducts. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:16553–16560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Walker J M, Sarsate M, Runswick M J, Gay N J. Distantly related sequences in the A- and B-subunits of ATP synthase, myocin, kinases, and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982;1:945–951. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang R-F, Kushner S R. Construction of versatile low-copy-number vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1991;100:195–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Washburn B K, Kushner S R. Characterization of DNA helicase II from a uvrD252 mutant of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:341–350. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.2.341-350.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Washburn B K, Kushner S R. Construction and analysis of deletions in the structural gene (uvrD) for DNA helicase II of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:2569–2575. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.8.2569-2575.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Willetts N S, Clark A J. Characteristics of some multiply recombination-deficient strains of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1969;100:231–239. doi: 10.1128/jb.100.1.231-239.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang G, Baugh L R, Deng E, Hamilton C M, Maples V F, Kushner S R. Conserved motifs II to VI of DNA helicase II from Escherichia coli are all required for biological activity. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7544–7550. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.23.7544-7550.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zieg J, Kushner S R. Analysis of genetic recombination between two partially deleted lactose operons of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1977;131:123–132. doi: 10.1128/jb.131.1.123-132.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zieg J, Maples V F, Kushner S R. Recombination levels of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants deficient in various replication, recombination, or repair genes. J Bacteriol. 1978;134:958–966. doi: 10.1128/jb.134.3.958-966.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]