Highlights
A systematic review of latest developments of untethered micro/nanorobots-based remote sensing systems with an emphasis on designing new coordinated control and sensing approaches.
The propulsion/motion control, functionalization of micro/nanorobots, sensing mechanisms, and applications are reviewed based on the up-to-date works.
The design and application of micro/nanorobot-based sensing platforms are discussed with the goal of building intelligent remote sensing systems.
Keywords: Micro/nanorobot, Remote sensing, Wireless control, Self-propulsion, Actuation at small scales
Abstract
Untethered micro/nanorobots that can wirelessly control their motion and deformation state have gained enormous interest in remote sensing applications due to their unique motion characteristics in various media and diverse functionalities. Researchers are developing micro/nanorobots as innovative tools to improve sensing performance and miniaturize sensing systems, enabling in situ detection of substances that traditional sensing methods struggle to achieve. Over the past decade of development, significant research progress has been made in designing sensing strategies based on micro/nanorobots, employing various coordinated control and sensing approaches. This review summarizes the latest developments on micro/nanorobots for remote sensing applications by utilizing the self-generated signals of the robots, robot behavior, microrobotic manipulation, and robot-environment interactions. Providing recent studies and relevant applications in remote sensing, we also discuss the challenges and future perspectives facing micro/nanorobots-based intelligent sensing platforms to achieve sensing in complex environments, translating lab research achievements into widespread real applications.
Introduction
Hazardous pollutants are released into the environment due to the increasing anthropogenic activity and rapid industrialization. Exposure to these substances can be highly toxic, potentially fatal to humans, and harm the aquatic ecosystem. Thus, methods to sense and detect these pollutants, such as bacterial endotoxin, virus, and heavy metal ions, become essential in food safety and health monitoring. Detection techniques provide information on the presence and concentration of the target analyte (higher than the limit of detection), while sensing methods monitor changes in the target analyte under varying conditions. Conventional methods typically involve direct evaluation of specific toxins (e.g., mass spectrum) or indirect detection using probe techniques (e.g., DNA probes). These methods usually require sampling, extensive specimen purification, and qualified personnel to operate advanced instruments [1, 2]. In the case of hard-to-reach and easily contaminated samples, in situ sensing is advantageous, particularly for real-time monitoring of rapidly changing properties of the target analytes. Besides, active operation-based sensing, such as local mechanical properties measurement of cells and tissues, finds hard to conduct when applying conventional sensing strategies. In recent years, the rapid development of control systems and functionalization technology on micro/nanoscale objects has greatly promoted the application of micro/nanomachines in sensing tasks [3–8]. Consequently, this advancement leads to improved sensing resolution and accuracy as well as the miniaturization of sensing systems, enabling effective substances detection that traditional sensing methods find hard to achieve [9–13].
Untethered micro/nanorobots have come to the forefront as advanced tools due to their wireless operation capabilities and diverse functionalities. They are defined as mobile miniature devices in dimensions from several micro-/nanometer to millimeter scale that are capable of performing tasks in a controlled manner. Micro/nanorobots employ a variety of propulsion mechanisms, broadly classified into two main types: self-propulsion and external field-propulsion [14, 15]. Self-propelled microrobots derive their power from interactions with the surrounding environment, typically by catalyzing the breakdown of chemical fuels or through their self-degradation [16]. Their propulsion is specifically achieved through various strategies, including bubble generation [17], self-diffusiophoresis [18], self-electrophoresis [19, 20], Marangoni effect [21], and self-thermophoresis [22]. Micro/nanorobots can also be powered by external fields, such as magnetic field [23, 24], acoustic field [25, 26], electric field [27, 28], and light [29, 30]. Field-driven micro/nanorobots are designed with materials or structures that respond to external fields, thereby eliminating the need for chemical fuels in their environment [31, 32]. Combining different propulsion methods to develop hybrid-driven micro/nanorobots represents a promising approach for overcoming the limitations of a single propulsion method and expanding application scenarios [33–36]. Due to the synergistic effect of their motion characteristics and inherent physicochemical properties, micro/nanorobots find wide application in micromanipulation and targeted delivery [37–42].
Recently, micro/nanorobots have garnered significant attention as promising candidates for remote sensing due to their autonomous motion capabilities in various media, including solutions, biofluids, and even intracellular matrices [43–45]. Their small size makes them especially suitable as mobile sensors in complex media, and their controlled motion ability also contributes to micromixing, which is primarily governed by passive diffusion due to the laminar nature of flows at low Reynolds numbers [46]. The mobility of micro/nanorobots has demonstrated their capability in facilitating efficient micromixing and improving mass transfer, surpassing the limitations imposed by passive diffusion [47, 48]. However, these tiny robots are often restricted to specific operations or limited in certain application scenarios. It is essential to further functionalize them to meet a wide range of control and sensing requirements [49]. Combined with their motile features, functionalized micro/nanorobots can achieve enhanced performance due to real-time sensing capabilities and accelerated ‘on-the-fly’ reactions. Besides, micro/nanorobots-based sensing systems or platforms can perform in situ sensing in various media and even in cells [50, 51], thereby avoids sampling processes that might introduce errors in sensing precision and accuracy. Taking advantage of the mobile sensing capability, real-time bio-sensing and in vivo detection can be implemented in a controlled manner.
Self-generated Signal-based Sensing
Self-generated signal-based sensing relies on detecting signals generated by the robot, such as on–off fluorescence detection of toxins, on–off luminescence for chemical sensing, and electrochemiluminescent for biosensing (Fig. 2). This type of sensing or detection mechanism typically depends on the functionalization of robots, with a particular emphasis on surface functionalization, given that chemistry plays a pivotal role in determining the physicochemical properties of micro/nanorobots. The surfaces can be modified to function as reaction sites, thereby significantly influencing the interaction between micro/nanorobots and various analyte molecules in the environment (Fig. 1).
Fig. 2.
Self-generated signal-based sensing. a Peptide-modified self-propelled WS2/Pt and MoS2/Pt microrobots for on–off detection of E. coli [56]. Copyright (2020) American Chemical Society. b Fluorescent magnetic spore-based microrobots for remote detection of C. diff toxins [57]. Copyright (2020) The Authors. c Self-propelled unmodified graphene microrobots for quantitative analysis of mycotoxins in food samples [52]. Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society. d Enzyme-driven microrobot for fluorescence HCl and NH3 gases sensing [58]. Copyright (2016) Royal Society of Chemistry. e Ultrasound-driven nanorobot for single cell real-time miRNAs sensing [59]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society. f Self-sensing enzyme-powered microrobot equipped with pH-responsive DNA nanoswitches [60]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society
Fig. 1.
The outline of this review from four critical and closely related factors, including the propulsion/motion control of micro/nanorobots, functionalization of robots, sensing mechanism, and applications. Figures are adapted from the following references: toxin/gas detection [52], copyright (2017) American Chemical Society; chemical sensing [53], copyright (2019) American Chemical Society; biosensing [54], copyright (2022) Elsevier; fluid/physical property sensing [55], copyright (2016) Springer Nature
Toxin Sensing
In toxin detection, micro/nanorobots are commonly used for the detection of substances such as ricin B, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Clostridium difficile (C. diff), and others. Aptamer-mediated catalytic microrobots have been proposed for real-time on–off fluorescent detection of ricin B toxin [61]. The motion capability is achieved by designing the robot body using reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/Pt and synthesized through a standard membrane-template electrodeposition protocol. The Pt component of the microrobot serves as a catalyst for the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the solution, generating oxygen bubbles that create a recoil force propelling the microrobot. These microrobots are modified with a specific ricin B aptamer tagged with a fluorescein-amidine (FAM) dye, and the fluorescence emitted by the FAM dye is effectively quenched due to the π–π interactions with the rGO surface. In contrast to conventional binding processes, a moving microrobot accelerates the specific binding of the toxin to the dye conjugate, resulting in real-time fluorescent “On" detection, demonstrating the efficiency of microrobot-based sensing. “On-the-fly" sensing platforms are also proposed for detecting E. coli in bioassays. WS2/Pt and MoS2/Pt microrobots exhibit bubble-propulsion in 2% H2O2 solution, and they are functionalized with affinity peptide probe for on–off toxin detection [56]. The sensing performance is significantly influenced by the distinct surface characteristics of the microrobots. Due to improved peptide probe loading and release, WS2/Pt microrobot with a comparatively higher outer surface exhibits a 3.5-fold increase in sensitivity compared to MoS2/Pt microrobot (Fig. 2a). Therefore, the peptide-modified WS2/Pt microrobots are employed as a cost-effective sensing tool for the high-throughput determination of E. coli endotoxin, with a detection limitation of 1.9 ng mL−1. In addition to the tubular-shaped microrobot-based sensing method, a spherical fluorophore fluoresceinamine (FLA)/silica-NH2/Pt microrobot is proposed for “on-the-fly" sensing of sarin and soman simulants, based on the on–off fluorescent strategy [62]. The motion of multiple microrobots within a contaminated sample induces continuous mixing, significantly enhancing mass transfer. As a result, the reaction rates between the contaminated solution and the microrobots are increased compared to static microrobot counterparts. Moreover, the mobility of FLA-coated microrobots facilitates their real-time fluorescence quenching upon interaction with reactive nerve agents, enabling rapid and dynamic response.
In addition to the self-propelled microrobot-based sensing strategy, fluorescent magnetic spore-based microrobots have been designed as mobile sensors for detecting toxins secreted by C. diff in patients’ stool [57]. The synthesis procedure involves the direct deposition of magnetic nanoparticles and the encapsulation of sensing probes on porous natural spores, specifically magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for actuation and functionalized carbon nanodots for selective fluorescence sensing (Fig. 2b). The fabricated paramagnetic spore-based microrobot becomes magnetized along its long axis when an external magnetic field is applied and demonstrates three motion modes: spinning, rotation-translation, and tumbling, depending on different magnetic field parameters. The microrobot can autonomously navigate along a pre-determined path by controlling the input magnetic field, and its fluorescence trajectories are recorded. Thus, real-time evaluation of C. diff toxins is accomplished by directly monitoring the fluorescence change. Compared with static sensing methods, the continuous movement in microrobots leads to an enhanced detection ability by facilitating a significant increase in the mass transfer of detected toxins. Such a quantum dots (QDs)-based microrobotic sensing strategy is also proposed using a magnetocatalytic hybrid Janus microrobot [63]. One side of the microrobot is modified with a large number of magnetic Fe3O4 and Pt nanoparticles, which endows the microrobot with magnetism and catalytic properties, respectively. This hybrid actuation design (two active areas) allows the microrobot to perform effective propulsion in the presence of H2O2 solution or magnetic fields. The sensing mechanism for lipopolysaccharides (LPS) relies on graphene QDs-based fluorescence quenching: the quenching effect occurs due to the highly specific recognition ability of the phenylboronic acid tags, which serve as receptors for the core polysaccharide region of the LPS. This strategy has been validated for the screening of complex urine and human serum samples.
Taking advantage of the mobile and high-sensitivity features, self-propelled microrobots have been utilized for food-safety diagnosis. The continuous movement of rGO/nickel/platinum nanoparticle microrobots around the sample enhances mixing and increases the contacts between targets and receptors [64]. The outer rGO layer and the internal Pt nanoparticle layer equip the microrobot with adsorption and catalytic propulsion features, enabling the on-the-move capture of free aptamers. Additionally, the intermediate Ni layer provides a magnetic response to external fields, ensuring precise control of the microrobots. Fumonisin B1 (FB1) determination can be detected with a limit of detection of 0.70 ng mL−1, and the system achieves concurrent FB1 and ochratoxin A (OTA) mycotoxin analysis. The “on-the-move” fluorescence quenching of the free aptamer in the rGO sensing layer also enables limits of detection for OTA and FB1 of 7 and 0.4 ng mL−1, respectively [52]. Functionalized QDs-based microrobots are proposed as mobile sensors for detecting food contamination [65]. Microrobot preparation involves utilizing a Pickering emulsion approach: simultaneous encapsulation of platinum nanoparticles to enhance bubble-propulsion as well as receptor-functionalized QDs for selective binding with the 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid, targeting the LPS from Salmonella enterica. The endotoxin sensing is based on the quenching of the native fluorescence of the QDs in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2c). The use of microrobot-based detection reduces the detection time from several hours (the existing Gold Standard) to approximately 15 min, with the lowest detection concentration reaching 0.07 ng mL−1, well below the toxic level for the human body (275 μg mL−1). The studies discussed above demonstrate the successful application of micro/nanorobots in toxin detection and sensing, including mycotoxin, endotoxin, and ochratoxin. By integrating signal monitoring and motion control of micro/nanorobots, highly sensitive detection of raw samples can be achieved with ease.
Gas Sensing
Toxic gas sensing strategies have been proposed using a microrobot-based sensing scheme. A polymer microrobot is constructed using a biodegradable polycaprolactone single crystal and catalase. These two components play distinct roles in sensing and self-propulsion, respectively [58]. Similar to Pt-based catalytic micro/nanorobots, propulsion is achieved through bubble recoil resulting from the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 by catalase. Utilizing the motion-induced solution mixing process and the pH-sensitive fluorescence molecule, the microrobot can effectively detect hazardous gases, such as HCl and NH3. Compared to its static counterpart, the dynamic microrobot demonstrates superior sensing performance, rendering it highly suitable for accurate and efficient gas detection (Fig. 2d). Taking advantage of the biodegradable nature of polycaprolactone, this microrobot has the ability to gradually degrade when immersed in a solution. Besides toxic gas sensing applications, microrobot can be applied as an oxygen sensor for intraocular measurements, which helps understand how oxygen affects various ophthalmological complications since intraocular oxygen measurements are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Ergeneman et al. propose a magnetically controlled wireless microrobot for minimally invasive intraocular oxygen concentration measurements [66]. The robot operates on the principle of luminescence quenching in the presence of oxygen, and the system integrates a luminescence optical sensor and a magnetic steering system, aiming at mobile sensing tasks at locations that are too invasive for human intervention. The microrobot can be inserted into the eye through a small incision in the sclera. Closed-loop position control within the vitreous humor can be achieved using applied magnetic fields and visual tracking through the pupil. This scheme system shows potential in mapping oxygen concentration within the eye, particularly in the preretinal area. Microrobot coated with luminescence oxygen sensor has been applied for in vitro sensing. The magnetic body enables magnetic control capability, and the coating consists of Pt (II) octaethylporphyrin (PtOEP) dyes as the luminescent material, enabling wireless excitation and optical readout [67]. Intraocular measurements can be taken based on the quenching of luminescence in the presence of oxygen.
Biosensing
Intracellular biosensing plays an essential role in disease detection. For example, microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate important biological processes through the modulation of gene expression [68]. A nanorobot-based intracellular miRNA sensing scheme has been proposed at the single-cell level [59]. Nanorobots are designed using dye-labeled single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) coated with graphene oxide (GO) on gold nanowires. These nanorobots have the ability to penetrate intact cancer cells under the influence of ultrasound fields (Fig. 2e). The ultrasound actuation is achieved based on the concave end of the nanowire, where the scattering of ultrasound waves creates a pressure gradient and causes the nanorobot’s propulsion. Upon internalization of the nanorobot into the cell, the initially quenched fluorescence signal, resulting from the π–π interaction between GO and a dye-labeled ssDNA, is restored. This recovery is attributed to the displacement of the dye-ssDNA probe from the GO-quenching surface when it binds to the target miRNA-21, triggering the intracellular on–off fluorescence switching phenomenon. This miRNA sensing scheme is validated in MCF-7 and HeLa cancer cells, in which the fluorescence signals can be measured in real-time, demonstrating real-time intracellular miRNA expression monitoring. It is noteworthy that the biocompatibility of materials is critical for cellular sensing. Potential materials for intracellular biosensing include nucleic acid materials [69], graphene hybrid nanomaterials [70], and two-dimensional materials [71, 72].
Enzymatic glucose sensing is achieved by using bipolar electrochemistry-driven electrochemiluminescent (ECL) microrobot [73]. The propulsion (chemomechanical motion) mechanism operates by generating hydrogen bubbles at the cathodic end of the bipolar electrodes, which are directed toward the feeder anode. Simultaneous oxidation of the luminophore and enzymatically produced NADH results in ECL emission, which shows a direct correlation between glucose concentration and light intensity. This enzymatic sensing strategy combines wireless propulsion with enzymatic selectivity, demonstrating that the ECL-based readout method can be applied to moving objects. Procalcitonin (PCT) is recognized as a specific biomarker in the early clinical diagnosis of severe infectious diseases and bacterial sepsis. It is increasingly used in clinical practice to guide antibiotic therapy decisions. A microrobot-based fluorescence immunoassay is employed for PCT determination [74]. The Pt nanoparticle and Ni layers of the microrobot contribute to the catalytic self-propulsion and magnetic guidance, respectively, and the polymeric polypyrrole (PPy) outer layer enables binding capacity of the specific antibodies (anti-PCT). This strategy holds a sensitive PCT detection (0.07 ng mL−1) in clinical samples obtained from very low-birth-weight infants with suspected sepsis.
Chemical Sensing
The coupling of optical properties of QDs and motion capability of micro/nanorobots enables mobile chemical sensing that provides real-time optical visualization of the analyte recognition events. Integrating fluorescence CdTe QDs onto the surface of a self-propelled tubular microrobot enables real-time detection, as the motion of the robot accelerates the binding process between trace amounts of mercury (Hg) and the QDs [97]. Selective fluorescence quenching by Hg enables effective discrimination between different mercury species and other co-existing ions, offering enhanced detection capabilities. Ag-C3N4 microrobots decompose H2O2 into oxygen bubbles under visible light irradiation, offering light-controllable motion capabilities [98]. As a metal-free microrobot, the inherent fluorescence and adsorptive capability are visualized because of the translucent body. Interestingly, the swimming capabilities of the microrobots are enhanced when exposed to prevalent toxic pollutants commonly found in wastewater, such as Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cr2+. This is mainly caused by the binding interactions on the robot’s surface since transition metal ions can potentially facilitate fuel decomposition. Moreover, this property is utilized to effectively remove heavy metal from contaminated water while simultaneously monitoring its adsorption through fluorescence quenching. The fluorescence quenching mechanism has also been applied for explosive detection. A fluorescent self-propelled covalent-organic-frameworks (COFs) microrobot is proposed for nitro explosive detection [75]. These microrobots can autonomously move in aqueous solutions under magnetic guidance, utilizing oxygen bubbles generated through the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 as the propulsive force. The robot exhibits fluorescence quenching in several minutes when the functionalized Py-Azine COF interacting 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) through hydrogen bond formation, in which the moving robot-induced mixing increases the detection efficiency. A Janus upconverting nanoparticle (UCNP)-functionalized polyelectrolyte microrobot displays on–off luminescence when contacting 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) [99]. The amino groups of the poly (acrylic acid) chains on the UCNPs recognize the TNT molecules and form a Meisenheimer complex. The robot’s luminescence intensity is reduced because the fluorescence resonance energy transfer from the excited UCNPs to the complex. The limit of detection reaches 2.4 ng mL−1 because the collision probability between the mobile microrobot and TNT molecules is increased, and the detection can be conducted within 1 min.
Biocatalytic micro/nanorobots exhibit self-propulsion through enzymatic reactions, which can be utilized for real-time environment monitoring. The surface of mesoporous silica-based microrobots is modified with FRET-labeled triplex DNA nanoswitch for pH sensing [60]. This urease-powered microrobot can sense pH changes through FRET imaging while in motion. Its self-propulsion is achieved by urease converting urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide (Fig. 2f). During self-propulsion, the decomposition of urea and the subsequent release of ammonia led to a rapid increase in pH. This pH change is monitored in real time by assessing the FRET efficiency through confocal laser scanning microscopy. This sensing scheme enables rapid and quantitative pH detection in a matter of microseconds. A self-propelled laser microrobot is designed for the detection of extracellular vesicles and binding dynamics in complex biological fluids [100]. The microlasers are fabricated by micellar solubilization of liquid crystal, and the sensing functionality is obtained by tailoring with antibodies to capture specific proteins on extracellular vesicles. Nile red-labeled extracellular vesicles served as the gain medium to report binding events on the surface of the microcavity. When binding events take place, both radiative and nonradiative energy transfer occurs at the interface of the cavity, resulting in a shift of laser emissions from green to red bands. By monitoring the spectrally integrated laser intensities influenced by interfacial cavity energy transfer, the analysis of exosomes and biomarkers can be performed. Table 1 summarizes the recent progress on self-generated signal-based sensing strategies according to the types of micro/nanorobots, actuation methods, sensing targets, and mechanisms.
Table 1.
Representative micro/nanorobot self-generated signal-based sensing and behavior-based sensing
System type | Micro/nanorobots | Actuation | Sensing targets | Sensing mechanism | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Self-generated signal-based sensing | rGO/Pt microrobots | Chemically driven | Ricin B toxin | Fluorescence quenching | [61] |
WS2/Pt MoS2/Pt microrobots | Chemically driven | E. coli endotoxin | On–off fluorescence | [56] | |
Magnetic spore-based microrobots | Magnetic field-driven | C. diff toxins | Fluorescence changes | [57] | |
rGO/Pt microrobots | Chemical-magnetic hybrid | Fumonisin B1 | Fluorescence quenching | [52] | |
Polymer microrobots | Chemically driven | HCl, NH3 | pH sensitive fluorescence molecule | [58] | |
PtOEP-coated CoNi microrobots | Magnetic field-driven | Intraocular oxygen concentration | Luminescence quenching | [67] | |
ssDNA/GO-coated gold nanowires | Ultrasound waves | miRNAs | Fluorescence quenching | [59] | |
Covalent-organic-frameworks microrobots | Chemical-magnetic hybrid | Nitro explosive | Fluorescence quenching | [75] | |
DNA microrobots | Chemically driven | pH sensing | FRET-labeled triplex DNA nanoswitch | [60] | |
Behavior-based sensing | Au-Pt nanorobots | Chemically driven | Ag ions and nucleic acid | Ag ions induced accelerating | [76–78] |
PEDOT-Au microtubes | Chemically driven | DNA | DNA hybridization induced accelerating | [79] | |
Pt nanoparticles | Chemically driven | Zika virus | Antibody-receptor interaction induced accelerating | [80] | |
Cartridge-case-like microrobot | Chemically driven | pH sensing | pH increasing induced accelerating | [81] | |
Fish-like microrobot | Marangoni effect-driven | Glucose | Glucose molecules induced accelerating | [82] | |
Enzyme-powered microtubes | Chemically driven | Contaminants and chemical vapor | Biocatalytic activity inhibition | [83, 84] | |
Pt-based micro/nanorobots | Chemically driven | Heavy metal ions | Catalytic activity reduction | [85, 86] | |
Catalases-based microbots | Chemically driven | DNA | Catalases release by DNA hybridization | [87–89] | |
Pt microrobots | Chemically driven | HIV-1 RNA | DNA amplicons induced decelerating | [90] | |
Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | Viscosity | Velocity varies with viscosity | [91] | |
Au nanorods | Optical tweezers-driven | Viscosity | Viscosity-dependent rotating frequency | [92, 93] | |
Helical microrobots | Magnetic field-driven | Flow viscosity and velocity | Environment-influenced motion | [94, 95] | |
Ferrofluid droplets | Magnetic field-driven | Mechanical properties | Interact with environments through deformation | [55] | |
Fe3O4 nanoparticle swarm | Magnetic field-driven | Viscosity and ionic strength | Interact with environments through deformation | [96] |
Behavior-Based Sensing
Behaviors of micro/nanorobots change when subjected to external influences (e.g., changes in applied fields and surrounding environments), which can be directly observed by simple methods like optical microscopy. The behavior change caused specifically by objects that need to be detected can serve as visual signals for sensing. Behavior-based sensing of micro/nanorobots is generally achieved by establishing a quantitative relationship between the analyte and a specific micro/nanorobots behavior characteristic, and the desired information is obtained by observing the micro/nanorobots’ behaviors, such as motion and deformation.
Accelerating Motion-Based Sensing
The motion of micro/nanorobots is directly or indirectly influenced by analytes, leading to either an increase or decrease in speed. This phenomenon can be readily detected for motion-based sensing [101]. Wang et al. first report a chemical sensing platform based on the motion of fuel-driven nanorobots in 2009 [76]. They report that the velocity of Au-Pt catalytic nanorobots in H2O2 solution increases significantly in the presence of silver ions, while most other cations (e.g., K+, Pd2+, and Mn2+) cause speed reduction. The velocity of nanorobots is positively correlated with the concentration of silver ions, so this selective acceleration phenomenon is applied to trace measurements of silver ions [76] and the location of silver source [77]. Based on the same mechanism, they further develop a motion-based specific DNA and RNA sensing platform using catalytic nanorobots [78]. As shown in Fig. 3a, silver nanoparticle-tagged detector probes (SH-DP-Ag NPs) are captured on the gold electrode due to duplex formation of complementary nucleic acid target, and the concentration of the nucleic acid target is proportional to the amount of Ag nanoparticles captured. The silver ions are released into the H2O2 solution from the Ag nanoparticle tags, increasing the speed of catalytic nanorobots in the solution. Therefore, the motion signal of nanorobots observed by optical microscopy is connected with the target nucleic acid concentration, enabling DNA detection down to the attomole level as well as direct detection of raw bacterial ribosomal RNA. Micro/nanorobots can acquire their motion capability by specifically binding with external power sources or units, and their motion behaviors serve as signals for specific sensing. Minteer et al. design a motion-based DNA sensor with DNA-functionalized Pt nanoparticles as catalysts [79]. The first type of DNA (DNA 1) is attached to a PEDOT-Au microtube, and another type of DNA (DNA 2) is conjugated to Pt nanoparticles as catalysts for the microtube, as shown in Fig. 3b. Only in the presence of the DNA target (DNA 2) will the catalyst bind to the microtube by specific DNA hybridization. The catalyst-modified microtube exhibits movement in the H2O2 solution, and the velocity increases with the concentration of DNA 3. Shafiee et al. fabricate Pt nanoparticles and polystyrene microbeads conjugated with anti-Zika virus monoclonal antibody [80]. Pt nanoparticles accumulate on the surface of the bead when Zika virus is present in the sample, resulting in the movement of the bead. The moving velocity of the microbead is positively correlated with virus concentration.
Fig. 3.
Micro/nanorobot’s behavior-based sensing. a DNA and RNA sensing based on the Ag nanoparticle-induced nanorobot acceleration [78]. Copyright (2010) Springer Nature. b The catalyst-modified PEDOT-Au microtube as a DNA sensor through specific DNA hybridization [79]. Copyright (2015) Royal Society of Chemistry. c Enzyme-powered microtubes used for water quality sensing based on inhibition of the catalase biocatalytic [83]. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society. d Chemically powered jellyfish-like microrobot for motion-based DNA sensing [89]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society. e Local mechanical properties measurement of developing tissues and organs based on deformable ferrofluid droplets [55]. Copyright (2016) Springer Nature. f Pattern transformation of microrobot swarms used for sensing local fluidic viscosity and ionic strength [96]. Copyright (2022) American Chemical Society
Some micro/nanorobots have pH-dependent motion behavior and thus can serve as pH sensors. Dong and colleagues report two pH sensing methods based on the motion of micro/nanorobots [81, 102]. The first is a cartridge-case-like microrobot with a gelatin shell and inner Pt nanoparticles [81]. The variation in pH value affects the volume of gelatin, the catalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles, and the volumetric decomposition of H2O2, resulting in a change in the speed of the microrobot. Another pH sensor they designed is a metal-free polymer-based microrobot consisting of polycaprolactone (PCL) and sodium 1-dodecanesulfonate (DSS) [102]. Since the structure of the microrobot is asymmetric and particles on its surfaces are unevenly distributed, the release of DSS will cause asymmetric surface tension. The side that releases more DSS has lower surface tension, causing the microrobot to move toward the high surface tension side (Marangoni effect). The release of surfactant (DSS) is affected by the pH conditions, changing the speed of the microrobot. Both microrobots move faster with larger pH values over the entire pH range and can therefore be used as pH sensors. It is worth noting that microrobot speed is negatively correlated with hydrogen ion concentration. Based on a similar principle, they also design a fish-like microrobot composed of hydrogel and surfactant [82]. Glucose molecules cause the hydrogel to swell and release the surfactant, leading to the motion of microrobots on the water surface at speed proportional to the glucose concentration. Therefore, this enzymeless microrobot can be applied to glucose sensing in human serum or urine, which may serve as an alternative to the common enzyme-based glucose detection methods.
Decelerating Motion-Based Sensing
The presence of sensing objects may also impede the motion of micro/nanorobots, leading to a negative correlation between their motion speed and the concentration of these sensing objects. The biocatalytic activity of enzymes is susceptible to inhibition by toxins, resulting in weakened signals. This principle has been employed in the development of enzyme-based inhibition assays [103]. Similarly, the motion of enzyme-based micro/nanobots is impaired by specific agents. An enzyme-powered microtube is developed to assess the water quality based on this phenomenon [83]. As shown in Fig. 3c, the inner gold surface of the microtube is bonded with catalase, which decomposes H2O2 to generate bubbles for propulsion. The biocatalytic activity of catalase is inhibited by contaminants in water (e.g., heavy metals, pesticides, and herbicides), reducing the generation rate of bubbles. The water-quality testing platform is established according to the quantitative analysis of adverse effects of various toxins on the speed and survival time of microtubes. This type of microtube is employed for remote detection of chemical vapor threats based on the inhibition of biocatalytic catalase activity by the dissolution of chemical vapor in water inhibits [84]. Considering the challenges in pinpointing the precise cause of motion reduction in enzyme-based micro/nanorobots, this sensing approach is designed to detect a broader category of substances, including water pollutants and chemical vapors, rather than focusing on a specific object. Bubble-propelled Pt catalytic micro/nanorobots have low efficiency in generating bubbles due to the absorption of heavy metal ions that cover the active site. As a result, their motion behaviors have been utilized to build sensing platforms for heavy metal ions in water. Pumera et al. find that the reduction in the movement speed of Pt microrobots due to Pb2+ is more significant than that caused by Cd2+, enabling selective detection of Pb2+ over Cd2+ in water [85]. They further explore the negative impact of various heavy metal ions on Pt-Halloysite nanorobots with more available active sites [86]. Their findings reveal that larger ions (Hg2+ and Pb2+) have a greater influence on the nanorobots’ motion due to better platinum adsorption compared to smaller ions (Zn2+ and Cd2+). The Pt-Halloysite nanorobots are employed to selectively detect and remove heavy metal ions in water solutions, following the sequence: Hg2+ > Pb2+ > Zn2+ > Cd2+. While Pt-based micro/nanorobots enable the selective detection of heavy metal ions with a low limit of detection, it may be challenging to ascertain the type and concentration of ions when multiple ions across various concentration ranges are present in the solution. One possible solution involves employing two or more types of micro/nanorobots for collaborative sensing to improve sensitivity and accuracy.
Enzyme-actuated micro/nanorobots have also been applied to DNA sensing. Wu and colleagues synthesize a microtube with catalases on its inner surface through DNA conjugate, which exhibits a significant speed reduction in the presence of target DNA [87]. Unlike sensing methods that decrease the movement of micro/nanorobots by reducing the catalytic activity of enzymes [83], DNA sensing here is achieved by reducing the amount of enzyme assembled on the microtube. Target DNA releases catalases from microtubes by DNA strand-replacement hybridization, resulting in slower self-propelled motion. They improve the DNA sensing sensitivity by constructing multiple DNA layers on the inner surface of microtubes with a cyclic alternate hybridization assembly method [88]. Each power unit contains a higher amount of catalase than before, and thus the microtube exhibits efficient propulsion even in low-concentration H2O2 solutions. When the multilayer DNA and catalases are released due to hybridization with target DNA, decreases in microtube velocity are more easily observed. In further work, they improve the structure of the DNA sensor and design a jellyfish-like microrobot consisting of a multimetallic shell and DNA architecture with catalase on the concave surface (Fig. 3d) [89]. Although the detection principle is still displacement hybridization-triggered catalase release, the jellyfish-like microrobot has higher sensing sensitivity because the open surface allows the target DNA to bind better to the sensing unit than the tubular surface. It is reported in another study that DNA-engineered Pt microrobots are used for HIV-1 RNA detection [90]. Large-sized DNA amplicons are formed from HIV-1 through loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction and then hybridized into DNA probes on the microrobots. Unlike their proposed Zika virus sensing method [80], DNA amplicons captured by microrobots provide no additional power but rather act as a burden that hinders motion. The large DNA tail results in an obvious velocity reduction of the microrobot, which establishes the connection between the motion of Pt microrobots and HIV-1 RNA concentrations. A shared characteristic of these sensing methods is that they establish a connection between the concentration of target nucleic acid molecules and the motion speed of micro/nanorobots through DNA hybridization, yielding excellent specificity and sensitivity. This design concept is expected to be extended to micro/nanorobots driven by various methods, providing a straightforward visualization approach for DNA/RNA sensing.
Surrounding environments have significant influences on the motion behaviors of micro/nanorobots. Therefore, in addition to specific substances such as ions and DNA molecules, motion behaviors of micro/nanorobots are also used to detect the physical properties of their surrounding environments. Generally, it is more difficult for micro/nanorobots to move in fluids with higher viscosity due to smaller Reynolds numbers. Zhang et al. investigate the motion behavior of Pt microtubes in H2O2 solutions with different viscosities and establish a hydrodynamic model [91]. The microtubes are used as viscometers due to the negative linear correlation between their motion speed and fluid viscosity. The optical tweezers-driven rotation of micro/nanorobots is influenced by the viscosity of surrounding fluids. Käll et al. report the extremely fast rotation of gold nanorods in aqueous solutions through optical torques and find that the rotating frequency decreases with increasing viscosity [92]. The optical tweezer generates a microvortex by driving SiO2 particles or yeast cells along a fixed circular trajectory, indirectly rotating cells within the trajectory [93]. The rotation of micro/nanorobots results from viscous stress and has a frequency that is negatively correlated with ambient fluid viscosity. Ghosh et al. estimate fluid viscosity by observing the position and orientation of a helical microrobot driven by external magnetic fields [94]. They treat the helical microrobot as a ferromagnetic rod and establish a relationship among the critical frequency (), the rotating frequency of the magnetic field (), and the precession angle () as . Therefore, the critical frequency can be obtained by measuring the precession angle, and then, the viscosity of the local fluid is calculated. This method is validated in both Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids, allowing viscosity measurements in the range of 100 cP. Micro/nanorobots designed for liquid viscosity sensing require a stable motion state and motion behavior correlated with viscosity, which are crucial factors for obtaining accurate viscosity measurements. The small size of micro/nanorobots makes them particularly well-suited for measuring the viscosity of minute liquid samples, such as viscosity sensing in micro/nanoelectromechanical systems or even in vivo environments. In addition, microrobots moving in dynamic environments can also reflect flow information. The local flow velocity is obtained by comparing the actual velocity of a magnetic helical microrobot in flow with its theoretical velocity in the absence of flow, benefiting the optimization of motion control [95].
Deformation-Based Sensing
The magnetic field can not only drive the motion of micro/nanorobots but also induce their deformation behavior, which is influenced by the surrounding environment [104]. Campàs et al. propose a strategy to directly measure the local mechanical properties using deformation of micro/nanorobots, with biocompatible magnetic ferrofluid microdroplets as sensors (Fig. 3e) [55]. The ferrofluid droplet can elongate into an ellipsoid under a uniform magnetic field with its major axis along the field direction [105]. The strain of the droplet is related to the mechanical properties (viscous or elastic elements) of the surrounding materials. They establish a 1D description of the complex mechanical properties of surrounding materials and droplet deformation. The feasibility of using ferrofluid droplets as micro-rheometers and micro-tensiometers is validated in materials with known properties. Finally, in vivo quantitative spatiotemporal measurements of tissue-level mechanical properties in developing zebrafish embryos are demonstrated. Yu and colleagues develop a vortex-like nanoparticle swarm with reversible pattern reconfiguration ability [106] and use the deformation behavior of the microrobot swarm to detect local fluidic viscosity and ionic strength [96]. The influence of fluidic properties on the spreading and elongation of the vortex-like swarm is investigated, and data models for sensing fluidic viscosity and ionic strength are established. By measuring the rates of spreading and elongation, the viscosity and ionic strength of porcine whole blood are successfully measured (Fig. 3f). Furthermore, the deformation of microrobots has also been used for force sensing, which is achieved by observing the degree of deformation of elastic structures in microrobotic systems [107, 108]. The methods enable the measurement of forces at the micro-Newton level or lower, e.g., forces for manipulating biological cells.
In addition to behaviors like locomotion, rotation, and deformation, the tactic behavior of micro/nanorobots holds potential for the development of intelligent sensing platforms. Here, tactic behavior refers to micro/nanorobots behaving like many biological organisms and moving toward or away from certain signal sources, such as chemical gradient, light source, gravity, flow, and magnetic field [109, 110]. For instance, chemically driven micro/nanorobots exhibit chemotaxis in response to varying fuel concentrations [111, 112]. It has been reported that platinum-gold microrods spontaneously move toward areas with higher H2O2 concentrations when there is a gradient present [113]. A polymer microsphere with catalytic palladium randomly distributed on its surface shows tactic behavior in H2O2 solutions with a pH gradient, which is attributed to the solute pressure imbalance across its surface [114]. The microsphere can perform specific behaviors, including random walking, translation, vertical movement, jumping, and pulsating movement, when adjusting the pH gradient or its size. Mou et al. develop a ZnO-based Janus microrobot powered by the biocompatible fuel CO2, which displays intelligent positive chemotaxis to CO2 gradient [115]. The propulsion is a result of the electrolyte self-diffusiophoresis induced by the CO2 dissolution-caused ZnO corrosion, while the tactic behavior arises from the phoretic torque generated by the unbalanced electro-osmotic slips when the microrobot’s axis is misaligned with the chemical gradient. These tactic behaviors of micro/nanorobots can be employed to sense information about their surroundings, such as local gradients of H2O2, pH, and CO2. Consequently, developing intelligent micro/nanorobots with tactic behavior as sensors in complex and variable environments signifies a promising avenue for building micro/nanorobot-based intelligent sensing platforms. In conclusion, Table 1 provides a summary of representative sensing strategies based on behaviors of micro/nanorobots.
Micro/Nanorobots Selectively Capture and Transport Targets for Sensing
The isolation of target analytes from raw samples is a necessary preliminary step in many common sensing methods, often requiring time-consuming and intricate procedures. Micro/nanorobots are emerging as alternative tools for effectively isolating target analytes, thereby enhancing the efficiency of sample pretreatment in sensing. The isolation process based on micro/nanorobots typically involves two steps: capture and transportation. Micro/nanorobots utilize specific reactions to recognize and capture target analytes, which are then transported to the desired location through active motion. This allows for the isolation of target analytes from complex raw samples, enabling precise and quantitative sensing. In subsequent sensing processes, external stimuli can be applied to trigger the release of the captured analytes. With their small size and controllable active motion, micro/nanorobots demonstrate exceptional capability in isolating targets from intricate samples, especially when dealing with small volumes and low concentrations. This section presents research studies in which micro/nanorobots are utilized to selectively capture, transport (and release) targets for sensing tasks.
Biological Motor-Based Capture
Motor proteins (such as kinesin and myosin) consume energy from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis to move along the cytoplasm of cells and transport specific substances (e.g., proteins and vesicles) [116]. The unique mechanism enables micro/nanorobots actuated by biomolecular motors to serve as carriers for capturing and transporting target analytes in sensing tasks [117, 118]. In a “smart dust” sensing microdevice, the wash steps in traditional double-antibody sandwich assays are replaced by transport steps based on molecular shuttle (Fig. 4a) [119]. The target analytes (streptavidin or glutathione-S-transferase) are captured by kinesin-powered antibody-functionalized microtubules and transported to bind fluorescent markers, and the microtubules loaded with both analytes and markers move finally into the detection region. DNA hybridization technique is incorporated into biomolecular motor transport-based sensing systems to achieve target loading and unloading [120, 121]. The microtubules and cargo modified with complementary DNA bind to each other at specific sites by DNA hybridization, and the cargo is subsequently unloaded at the location where the DNA complementary to that labeled on the cargo is attached.
Fig. 4.
Micro/nanorobots selectively capture and transport targets for sensing. a A “smart dust” microdevice based on biomolecular motors for capturing and transporting target analytes [119]. Copyright (2009) Springer Nature. b Bubble-propelled catalytic Ti/Ni/Au/Pt microtubes for isolating nucleic acid from raw biological samples. The optical images show the microtube capturing target DNA from a sample reservoir and transporting it through a 6 mm-long channel into a clear well [122]. Copyright (2011) American Chemical Society. c The Ti/Fe/Au/Pt microtubes selectively capture target cancer cells through specific antigen recognition. The optical images show the microtube capturing and transporting a CEA+ pancreatic cancer cell in diluted human serum [123]. Copyright (2011) John Wiley and Sons. d Magnetic microrobots capture SARS-CoV-2 virus and Ag-AuNR tags and self-assemble into 3D-staggered chains through immuno-sandwich assay. Subsequent detection is achieved based on the hydrogen evolution reaction of Ag-AuNR tags [124]. Copyright (2022) Elsevier. e Ultrasound-powered magnetically guided Au-Ni-Au nanowires for selective capture and transport of bacteria. The optical images show capture and transport of a magnetic bead, E. coli bacteria, and S. aureus bacteria, respectively [125]. Copyright (2013) American Chemical Society. f Light-powered MXene-derived γ-Fe2O3/Pt/TiO2 microrobots for capture and detection of nanoplastics. The SEM images show microrobots with nanoplastics captured [126]. Copyright (2022) Springer Nature
Chemically Catalytic Micro/Nanorobots-Based Capture
The limited lifespan and isolating efficiency of biological motors in complex raw samples limit their application in sensing tasks. Taking advantage of their excellent motion ability, ease of functionalization, and wide actuation environments, synthetic micro/nanorobots have become a promising option for capturing and transporting target analytes [127]. Among them, chemically catalytic micro/nanorobots, especially tubular micro/nanorobots (microtubes), have been widely reported for the isolation of nucleic acids, proteins, cells, bacteria, etc. [128]. Spherical mesoporous silica particles functionalized with catalase on one side and single-stranded DNA on another side are fabricated for DNA capture [129]. The catalase catalyzes the breakdown of H2O2 to generate bubbles for actuation of the asymmetrically functionalized microspheres, while the modified DNA allows rapid isolation and subsequent detection of the target oligonucleotide sequence. Wang and colleagues fabricate bubble-propelled catalytic Ti/Ni/Au/Pt microtubes for isolating nucleic acid targets from a variety of untreated biological samples (e.g., serum, urine, and saliva), as shown in Fig. 4b [122]. The external gold layer of the microtube is modified with single-strand DNA, which binds with the target nucleic acid through DNA hybridization. These microtubes are able to transport the captured nucleic acid to a clean area for subsequent analysis.
Bubble-propelled microtubes have been reported to isolate target proteins from complex raw biological samples [130]. The Ti/Ni/Au/Pt microtube is functionalized with thiolated thrombin aptamer (SH-TBA) onto its outer gold surface, endowing the microtube with the ability to capture and transport the target thrombin protein. To achieve controlled release of the captured thrombin protein, the TBA receptor is replaced by a mixed binding aptamer (MBA) receptor, followed by the addition of ATP. The added ATP can bind and replace the immobilized MBA aptamer, triggering the release of captured thrombin. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP) are used to synthesize microtubes capable of selectively transporting proteins [131]. The electropolymerization of the microtube outer polymeric layer is carried out in the presence of the target protein (avidin), and the obtained microtube surface has selective recognition sites of the target protein through complementary nanocavities. After the electrodeposition of Pt and Ni in the inner layer, MIP-based microtubes with abilities to recognize, capture, and directional transport target proteins without functionalization of additional receptors are obtained. The MIP-based micro/nanorobots can be extended to the selective transport of various target analytes. Antibody-modified Fe3O4@ SiO2/Pt nanoparticles are fabricated to cruise and capture immunoglobulin (IgG) via self-propelled motion [132]. Core–shell Au@Ag nanocubes that serve as labels of secondary antibodies bind with captured IgG to amplify electrochemical signals. The sandwich immune-complex is formed through self-assembly and can transfer rapidly on the electrode under magnetic actuation, enabling the sensing of IgG by using differential pulse voltammetry. Micro/nanorobots can capture target proteins and serve as labels for electrochemical detection [133]. Self-propelled IrO2/Pt bilayer microtube and tosyl-activated magnetic beads are modified with anti-rabbit IgG, and they are coupled in the presence of target rabbit IgG. The self-propelled motion of the microtube facilitates the capture, while the magnetic beads make the immune sandwich assay easy to separate and fix on the electrode. The electrocatalytically active IrO2 outer layer can enhance hydrogen evolution reaction for electrochemical detection of target proteins. A rapid on-the-fly C-reactive protein (CRP) sensing method is developed based on magnetic graphene microtubes [134]. The microtube has an outer rGO layer, a middle Ni layer, and an inner Pt nanoparticles layer, which are responsible for antibody functionalization, magnetic guidance, and propulsion, respectively. The rGO layer is first immobilized with streptavidin and then modified with CRP antibody. The antibody-modified microtubes are actuated in solutions containing the CRP targets and anti-CRP detection antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) to form the sandwich immunocomplex for electrochemical measurements. This method allows rapid (5 min) and accurate determination of CRP in small-volume plasma samples (< 10 μL). Ma et al. fabricate microtubes with an outer layer of mesoporous silica (mSiO2) and an inner layer of TiO2 modified with Fe3O4 and Pt nanoparticles [135]. The presence of the outer mSiO2 layer endows the TiO2@mSiO2 microtube with water pollutants adsorption ability three times higher than that of common TiO2 microtubes. Microtubes that absorb pollutants can be collected by magnetic attraction and then placed in deionized water to release their absorbates. The composition of pollutants is further analyzed for environmental monitoring.
Larger targets, such as cells and bacteria, can also be selectively captured and transported by micro/nanorobots. The Ti/Fe/Au/Pt microtube is modified with anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (anti-CEA) monoclonal antibody on its external gold surface [123], where the CEA is one of the most common antigens among cancer cells [136]. The antibody-modified microtubes are able to selectively capture target cancer cells through specific antigen recognition in PBS and serum (Fig. 4c). The microtubes can generate enough force (> 13 pN) to overcome the additional resistance after capturing the cells and perform continuous directional transport under the guidance of the magnetic field. Although the chemical fuel (hydrogen peroxide) required for the propulsion of the microtubes affects the viability of the cells, the low H2O2 concentration (2%) allows most isolated cells to survive for a certain period of time (1 h) for subsequent analysis. Besides, even dead target cells or fragments of their cellular membrane can be identified and captured by the microtube. Another boronic acid-based microtube demonstrates the ability to capture yeast cells through selective monosaccharide recognition [137]. The outer layer of the polymer/Ni/Pt microtube is poly (3-aminophenyl boronic acid) (PAPBA), which can form complex with monosaccharides and is widely used for glucose sensing [138, 139]. The PAPBA outer layer endows the microtube with “built-in” monosaccharide recognition ability without the need for additional functionalization and has no significant effect on the catalytic propulsion. Yeast cells with sugar residues on their walls are successfully captured and transported by the microtubes. The release of captured yeast cells can be triggered by the addition of fructose, which has a stronger affinity for boronic acid. A lectin receptor-functionalized microtube has been reported for the capture, transport, and release of E. coli [140]. Concanavalin A (ConA) lectin bioreceptor modified on the surface of Au/Ni/polyaniline/Pt microtube can selectively recognize and bind carbohydrate constituents on the bacterial surface (such as polysaccharides on the surface of E. coli) [141], enabling the microtube to capture E. coli in various complex real samples (e.g., drinking water, apple juice, and seawater). The release of captured E. coli is achieved by dissociating the lectin-bacteria complex using a low-pH glycine solution.
External Field-Driven Micro/Nanorobots-Based Capture
While the capture and transport abilities of typical catalytic micro/nanorobots for various targets have been demonstrated in numerous studies, their reliance on additional chemical fuels can restrict their application in sensing scenarios involving analytes sensitive to such fuels. In addition to chemically driven micro/nanorobots, there are external field-driven micro/nanorobots, including those driven by magnetic fields, acoustic fields, and light fields, which have also been reported to possess selective capturing and transportation capabilities.
Paramagnetic nanoparticles are modified with antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to selectively capture and pre-concentrate SARS-CoV-2 virus under applied rotating magnetic fields (Fig. 4d) [124]. Silver-shell/gold-core nanorods (Ag-AuNRs) modified with antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are used as electro-catalytic labels. The nanoparticles self-assemble into 3D-staggered chains through immuno-sandwich assay instead of individual or linear chains, significantly enhancing the capture and transport abilities. Linear sweep voltammetry is conducted to measure hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis of Ag-AuNRs in the magnetic immuno-sandwich assay, and enhanced current intensity is detected in the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles. Ultrasound-powered magnetically guided three-segment Au-Ni-Au nanowires exhibit the ability to isolate bacteria [125]. A sphere lithography technique is used to create concavity at the end of the nanowire to optimize the asymmetric acoustic pressure distribution, significantly improving the acoustic actuation performance (Fig. 4e). The Ni part allows the nanowire to navigate under an applied magnetic field. The surface of the gold part is functionalized with specific bioreceptors to selectively capture and transport target bacteria, such as E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), in complex samples. Pumera et al. design light-powered MXene-derived γ-Fe2O3/Pt/TiO2 microrobots to capture and detect nanoplastics [126]. The MXene multilayered structure offers an engineered electrostatic attraction to trap nanoplastics on the slits between multilayer stacks of the microrobots [142]. The microrobots perform effective 3D negative photogravitactic motion to capture nanoplastics in the whole space under the irradiation of ultraviolet (UV) light due to Pt deposition on the flat sides of the TiO2 microparticles (Fig. 4f). The decoration of magnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles allows the microrobots to be collected from treated water for the preconcentration and further detection of nanoplastics by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using low-cost and miniaturized screen-printed electrodes. Star-shaped BiVO4 microrobots perform self-propulsion under the irradiation of visible light in pure water due to asymmetrical photogeneration of chemical ions [143]. The local chemical gradient induced by light enables the BiVO4 microrobots to capture and transport surrounding objects (e.g., passive particles and living microorganisms) through phoretic attraction, and the release can be achieved by turning off the light field. Moreover, the BiVO4 microrobots tended to move toward and capture yeast cells in the presence of other microorganisms (e.g., E. coli) without additional surface functionalization and magnetic guidance. The selective capture is attributed to the rough surface, hydrophobicity, and intrinsic surface interactions of BiVO4 microrobots and yeast cells. Recently, another light-powered titanium dioxide-silica Janus particle is reported, capable of capturing and transporting passive microparticles and E. coli bacteria in the aqueous solution through dominant attractive van der Waals forces [144].
It is worth mentioning that micro/nanorobots as capturers perform rapid motion to increase contact with targets and significantly improve capture efficiency. The convection of surrounding fluid induced by the micro/nanorobots plays an important role in the rapid capture as well. In particular, the bubble-propelled micro/nanorobots generate bubbles to induce strong convection while providing sufficient propulsion for transporting captured cargoes. Compared with static capturer-based analytes isolating methods, active micro/nanorobots provide a promising method for faster and more efficient capture and transport of analytes in three-dimensional space for sensing. Related research works are summarized, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Representative studies on utilizing micro/nanorobots to capture and transport targets for sensing purposes and micro/nanorobot-assisted sensing
System type | Micro/nanorobots | Actuation | Sensing targets | Sensing mechanism | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selective capture and transport for sensing | Antibody-modified microtubules | Kinesin-powered | Protein and enzyme | Antibody-receptor interactions | [119] |
Antibody-modified microtubules | Kinesin-powered | DNA | DNA hybridization | [120, 121] | |
Spherical mesoporous silica particles | Chemically driven | DNA | DNA hybridization | [129] | |
Ti/Ni/Au/Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | Nucleic acid | DNA hybridization | [122] | |
Ti/Ni/Au/Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | Thrombin protein | Antibody-receptor interactions | [130] | |
MIP-based microtubes | Chemically driven | Avidin | Nanocavities enabled recognition | [131] | |
Fe3O4@SiO2/Pt nanoparticles | Chemically driven | Immunoglobulin | Sandwich immunoassay | [132] | |
IrO2/Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | Immunoglobulin | Sandwich immunoassay | [133] | |
Magnetic graphene microtubes | Chemically driven | C-reactive protein | Sandwich immunoassay | [134, 145] | |
TiO2@mSiO2 microtubes | Chemically driven | Pollutants | Surface absorption | [135] | |
Ti/Fe/Au/Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | Cancer cells | Antibody-receptor interactions | [123] | |
Boronic acid-based microtubes | Chemically driven | Yeast cells | Monosaccharide recognition | [137] | |
Au/Ni/polyaniline/Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | E. coli | Antibody-receptor interactions | [140] | |
Paramagnetic nanoparticles | Magnetic field-driven | SARS-CoV-2 virus | Antibody-receptor interactions | [124] | |
Au-Ni-Au nanowires | Acoustic field-driven | Bacteria | Antibody-receptor interactions | [125] | |
γ-Fe2O3/Pt/TiO2 microrobots | Light field-driven | Nanoplastics | Electrostatic trapping | [126] | |
Micro/-nanorobot-assisted sensing | Polyaniline-Pt microrobots | Chemically driven | Proteins | Enhancing mixing | [146] |
Fe3O4 nanoparticle chains | Magnetic field-driven | E. coli O157:H7 DNA and PSA | Enhancing mixing | [147] | |
Mg/Pt Janus microrobots | Chemically driven | Glucose | Enhancing mixing | [53] | |
Functional silk-based microrobots | Chemically driven and Marangoni effect-driven | Apolipoprotein E | Enhancing mixing | [148] | |
Mg-Ni-Au Janus microrobots | Chemically driven | Organophosphorus nerve agents | Enhancing mixing | [149] | |
Mg/Au Janus microrobots | Chemically driven | Diphenyl phthalate | Promoting degradation | [150] | |
γ-Fe2O3/SiO2 nanoparticles | Magnetic field-driven | H2O2 and glucose | Triggering colorimetric reaction | [151] | |
Enzyme-based microtubes | Marangoni effect-driven | H2O2 | Triggering colorimetric reaction | [152] | |
PEDOT/Ni/Pt microtubes | Chemically driven | Cortisol | Triggering colorimetric reaction | [153] | |
SW-Fe2O3/MnO2 microrobots | Chemically driven | Phenylenediamine isomers | Triggering colorimetric reaction | [154] | |
Fe3O4/Au/Ag nanoparticles | Magnetic field-driven | SARS-CoV-2 RNA | Hybridized duplex release | [54] | |
Pt/Ag3VO4 Janus particles | Light field-driven | Citric acid | Ag irons release | [155] | |
Magnetic nanoparticles | Magnetic field-driven | E. coli | Offering Raman labels | [156] | |
Au/SiO/Ti/Ag microtubes | Chemically driven | Rhodamine 6G | Enrichment of analytes | [157] | |
Bimetallic Au/Ag core/shell nanorods | Chemically driven | Picric acid | Enrichment of analytes | [158] | |
Match-like one-dimensional nanorobots | Light field-driven | Crystal violet and cancer cells | Enrichment of analytes | [159] | |
Gold nanorods | Acoustic field-driven | DNA | Enrichment of analytes | [160] | |
Au/SiO/Fe microtubes | Magnetic field-driven | Rhodamine 6G | Hotspots-based SERS enhancement | [161] | |
Silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles | Magnetic field-driven | Dye and biomolecules | Hotspots-based SERS enhancement | [162] |
Micro/Nanorobots-Assisted Sensing
Micro/nanorobots can play an auxiliary role in conventional sensing methods, such as electrochemical sensing, colorimetric sensing, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) sensing, to enhance the sensing performance. We classify methods in which micro/nanorobots assist sensing by exerting influence on environments, including enhancing mass transfer, triggering reactions, and accelerating reaction rates, as micro/nanorobot-assisted sensing (Table 2).
Enhancing Mixing
As mentioned above, micro/nanorobots moving in a fluid environment inevitably affect surrounding fluids. Wang et al. quantitatively characterize the fluid convection and mixing induced by bubble-propelled microrobots using passive polystyrene microbeads as tracers [48]. The mean squared displacement (MSD) of passive tracers becomes significantly larger under the influence of bubble-propelled microrobots, providing evidence for enhanced fluid transport resulting from the motion of microrobots. The efficiency of induced mass transfer can be further enhanced through special design of micro/nanorobots. Guan et al. design a bowl-shaped Janus polystyrene/Pt microrobot featuring an axis-asymmetric hollow structure, which is able to perform unique precession, synchronistic translation, and rotation [163]. Compared with typical Janus microrobots, the “on-the-fly” mass transfer generated by the axis-asymmetric microrobot is considerably multiplied due to the unusual motion mode. The enhanced fluid convection and mixing induced by micro/nanorobots show promising potential for improving sensing efficiency, and micro/nanorobots enhanced mixing-assisted sensing methods have been developed. In these methods, micro/nanorobots do not generate sensing signals or act as carriers for analytes; rather, their active movement is solely employed to improve the effectiveness of sensing through enhancing mixing.
The microarray technique is widely used in high-throughput analysis of small molecules such as DNA and proteins, however, the diffusion speed of molecules from solution to the surface of immobilized probes is relatively slow [164, 165]. Merkoçi and colleagues study the enhancement of solution mixing by self-propelled microrobots in microarray-based immunosensing [146]. Polyaniline-Pt microrobots generate bubbles in the H2O2 solution for propulsion, inducing local convection and vortex streams to promote mass transfer. The binding between molecular receptors (immobilized antibody microarrays) and target molecules (protein biomarkers) is enhanced with the assistance of microrobots, resulting in a relative increase in the detected signal intensity of up to 3.5-fold. In another study, polydopamine-crosslinked magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle chains are used as nanomixers to facilitate solution mixing in a microarray-based sensing system (Fig. 5a) [147]. The nanoparticle chains perform synchronous rotation under an external rotating magnetic field, generating steady circular fluid flowing around them. The movement of the molecules is significantly accelerated by the generated flow, increasing the detection sensitivity of E. coli O157:H7 DNA and prostate specific antigen (PSA) by more than four-fold. In addition, the enhanced mixing reduces spot-to-spot variability in the microarray system to less than 10%.
Fig. 5.
Micro/nanorobot-assisted sensing. a Polydopamine-crosslinked magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle chains enhance mixing in a microarray-based sensing system through rotating [147]. Copyright (2018) John Wiley and Sons. b Mg/Pt Janus microrobots accelerate oxidation of glucose for electrochemical sensing through enhancing mass transfer [53]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society. c PEDOT/Ni/Pt microtubes for rapid naked-eye cortisol sensing [153]. Copyright (2017) Elsevier. d Plasmonic-magnetic Fe3O4/Au/Ag nanorobots for SARS-CoV-2 RNA sensing [54]. Copyright (2022) Elsevier. e Au/SiO/Ti/Ag microtubes for enhanced SERS sensing through molecule enrichment. Reproduced with permission from [157]. Copyright (2016) Royal Society of Chemistry. f Au/SiO/Fe microrobots serve as mobile hotspots to enhance SERS signals [161]. Copyright (2020) American Chemical Society
Electrochemical sensing of glucose in human serum is reported to be enhanced by microrobot-induced mixing [53]. A glucose biosensor system is developed based on the enzymatic oxidation of glucose by glucose oxidase and electrochemical detection of the mediator (FcMeOH). Mg/Pt Janus microrobots are able to generate hydrogen bubbles for self-propulsion in human serum without additional chemical fuels [166]. The rapid movement of the microrobots and bubble-induced convection enhance the mass transfer, resulting in accelerated oxidation of glucose and FcMeOH on the electrode surface (Fig. 5b). The intensity of the measured current signal is proportional to the number of Mg/Pt Janus microrobots, and the limit of detection is improved when the microrobots concentration becomes higher. Zhao et al. use reactive inkjet printing to fabricate two microrobot stirrers capable of performing autonomous rotation for enhancing mixing, where the rotation is achieved through the Marangoni effect and the catalytic bubble generation, respectively [148]. Enzyme-blended regenerated silk fibroin inks are used to print the bubble-propelled microrobots, which endows the microrobots with the ability to decompose H2O2 for propulsion. They find that more defined circular rotation can be obtained by distributing catalase at both ends of the microrobot. Based on the rapid leaching of the additive (polyethylene glycol) contained in the ink to generate a surface tension gradient, they fabricate Marangoni effect-driven microrobots by using inks without enzymes. The Marangoni effect-driven microrobots generate rotation (600 rpm) 75–100 times faster than the enzyme-driven microrobots without additional chemical fuel, but their lifetime is shorter than that of the enzyme-powered microrobots. These two microrobot stirrers are expected to be used in sensing methods that require stirring to conveniently improve the sensing efficiency.
Triggering/Promoting Sensing Reactions
In addition to speeding up mass transfer through enhancing mixing, micro/nanorobots can trigger or promote the reactions required for sensing. In electrochemical measurements of organophosphorus (OP) nerve agents, Mg-Ni-Au Janus microrobots confined on the surface of sensor strips play the role of enhancing the amperometric signal [149]. While enhancing mass transfer through bubble generation, the microrobots also promote the degradation of non-detectable OP nerve agents (paraoxon) into electroactive compounds (p-nitrophenol) for electrochemical sensing without the need for additional reagents or instruments. The accelerated hydrolysis of paraoxon is attributed to the dramatic increase of pH by Mg-generated hydroxyl ions in the aqueous solution. Such dual-action microrobots significantly improve the sensitivity of paraoxon sensing by up to 15-fold. Based on a similar mechanism, Escarpa and colleagues design an Mg/Au Janus microrobot-based method for the sensing of organic pollutants (diphenyl phthalate, DPP) in food and biological samples [150]. On the one hand, the microrobot generated hydrogen bubbles for propulsion and enhanced mass transfer with NaCl acting as fuel and supporting electrolyte; on the other hand, the hydroxyl ions generated by Mg promote the rapid degradation of the non-electroactive DPP to electroactive phenol, which can be directly measured by differential pulse voltammetry on disposable screen-printed electrodes. This sensing method based on the dual action of Mg/Au Janus microrobots enables fast detection (~ 5 min) and high recovery (~ 100%), increasing the sensing sensitivity of DPP by about 20 times. Besides paraoxon and phenol, the increase in environmental pH induced by Mg-based micro/nanorobots is expected to be extended to the sensing and degradation of other pollutants, e.g., the degradation of non-electroactive carbofuran to electroactive carbofuran phenol in alkaline solution. Moreover, micro/nanorobots based on other catalytic materials (e.g., Zn and Pt) can also play a role in changing the pH of the environment while enhancing mixing.
Micro/nanorobots are able to change the color of solutions through reactions with analytes to achieve colorimetric detection. Ying et al. fabricate multifunctional asymmetric hematite-silica hybrid Janus γ-Fe2O3/SiO2 nanoparticles for sensitive colorimetric detection of H2O2 and glucose [151]. These magnetic Janus nanoparticles have intrinsic peroxidase-like catalytic activity and can maintain stable performance in a wider range of pH and temperature than natural enzymes. In the presence of H2O2, the chromogenic peroxidase substrate (3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine, TMB) is oxidized to blue products by the catalyzed hydroxyl ions from H2O2 degradation, which enables the detection of H2O2 by the naked eye or the change of absorbance at 652 nm. The SiO2 surface of the Janus particles is modified with glucose oxidase without affecting the catalytic activity of H2O2. Glucose is first oxidized to gluconic acid and H2O2, and the detection of glucose is achieved through a colorimetric reaction in the presence of TMB. Self-propelled tubular microrobots based on the Marangoni effect are also used for H2O2 sensing [152]. The surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate) is released from the tip of the microrobot, causing a surface tension gradient for propulsion. Meanwhile, HRP is released from the microrobot into the solution to decompose H2O2, causing TMB to be oxidized into blue color for visual or optical detection. The concentration of H2O2 is directly proportional to that of the TMB oxidation products, which can also be detected electrochemically by using chronoamperometry. A naked-eye cortisol sensing strategy is developed based on PEDOT/Ni/Pt microtubes modified with anti-cortisol antibody (Fig. 5c) [153]. The microtubes bind fast with HRP tag-labeled cortisol and then make the tetramethylbenzidine and H2O2 solution display deep blue color, which enables rapid naked-eye sensing (2 min) of cortisol with a low concentration (0.1 μg mL−1) and small volume (50 μL). Single-wall carbon nanotube (SW)-Fe2O3/MnO2 microrobots are designed for colorimetric sensing of pollutants (phenylenediamine isomers) in water [154]. The inner MnO2 layer catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2 as fuel to generate oxygen bubbles and hydroxyl radicals, and then the hydroxyl radicals cause the oxidation and dimerization of phenylenediamine isomers to change the color of the solution for colorimetric sensing. The Fe2O3 particles attached to the outer layer can accelerate fuel decomposition and endow the microrobot with magnetism and reusability.
The reaction between the micro/nanorobot and the target may lead to changes in its own composition or the composition of the environment, which provides information for sensing. Plasmonic-magnetic nanorobots consisting of Fe3O4/Au/Ag nanoparticles offer a simple and efficient method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA [54]. The Fe3O4/Au/Ag nanoparticles self-assemble into rod-shaped microaggregates under rotating magnetic fields, and the formed nanorobot is capable of performing controllable motion. Single-stranded DNA probes are modified on the nanoparticles, which hybridize with the complementary target RNA (Fig. 5d). After the hybridization reaction, the hybridized duplex is released from the nanorobot due to electrostatic repulsion. Quantitative measurement of residual DNA probes on the nanorobots is conducted by using differential pulse voltammetry on screen-printed electrodes, and the decrease in oxidation peak intensity is proportional to the concentration of target SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Pt/Ag3VO4 Janus particles are reported to have the ability to detect citric acid present in pollutants [155]. The Pt/Ag3VO4 microrobots perform self-propulsion under the irradiation of UV light without chemical fuels and effectively degrade pollutants (e.g., rhodamine B). The microrobots corrode in the presence of citric acid, in which Ag ions reacted with citric acid to form Ag nanoparticles. Sensing of citric acid is achieved by monitoring the position of the surface plasmon resonance maximum absorption of the released Ag nanoparticles.
Assisting SERS Sensing
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering is considered a powerful spectroscopic sensing technique capable of detecting low concentrations of analytes with exceptional sensitivity and specificity [167]. Micro/nanorobots actuated in different methods are used to assist in enhancing SERS sensing. For example, in a SERS-based E. coli enumeration method, antibody-coated magnetic nanoparticles and gold nanorods bind with E. coli through sandwich immunoassay [156]. Magnetic particles allow the separation of the sandwich complexes by magnetic attraction, while gold nanorods act as Raman labels. The nanorods are assembled with 5,5-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) for generating strong Raman signals. A calibration curve is obtained according to the detected SERS signal for calculating the amount of E. coli in the sample, and the result has no significant difference from that obtained from the traditional plate count method.
Observation of SERS signals requires a rough conductive material surface, and thus SERS probes are generally passive nanoparticles (such as gold and silver nanoparticles), which can only approach the analytes through passive diffusion [168]. Micro/nanorobot-based SERS probes have been reported in many studies as active analyte enrichment tools to enhance SERS detection. Mei et al. fabricate Au/SiO/Ti/Ag microtubes using rolled-up nanotechnology to enhance SERS signals (Fig. 5e) [157]. The Ag inner layer acts as a catalyst to decompose H2O2 into water and oxygen for propulsion, while the Au outer layer allows analytes adsorption. Rhodamine 6G as the analyte is a nitrogen-containing cationic dye and adsorbed on the gold surface through electrostatic force and N-Au interaction. Finally, enhanced SERS signals from the microtubes with R6G absorbed are observed. Another H2O2 fuel-driven bimetallic Au/Ag core/shell nanorod robots demonstrate the capability of SERS detection of explosives [158]. The fast self-propelled motion, as well as the highly reactive and curved Ag surface of the nanorobots, enhances Raman scattering, based on which the real-time SERS detection of trace explosives (picric acid) in solution is realized. A match-like light-powered nanorobot consisting of a core–shell Ag@SiO2 nanowire body and a spherical AgCl tail is used for active SERS sensing [159]. Ag@SiO2 nanowire serves as the SERS probe, and its inert SiO2 shell protects it from contamination and oxidation, which improves the SERS sensing ability via shell-isolated enhanced Raman spectroscopy [169]. Irradiation of UV light on the nanorobot causes the photocatalytic decomposition of the AgCl tail to produce hydrogen ions and chloride ions. The faster diffusion of hydrogen ions than chloride ions results in an overall electric field directed toward the head of the nanorobot, propelling the positively charged nanorobot forward. Under the irradiation of UV light, the nanorobot spontaneously gathered toward the center of the beam, and its motion can be remotely controlled by adjusting the light source. Enhanced Raman signals are obtained in SERS sensing of crystal violet and breast cancer cells with the assistance of the match-like nanorobot. The ultrasound-induced aggregation has been reported to enhance SERs detection [160]. The gold nanorods move randomly in the ultrasound field at a specific frequency to adsorb the analytes and then quickly gather to the position of the acoustic pressure node when reducing the frequency. The ultrasound-driven enrichment method facilitates sensitive and rapid SERS detection of ultra-trace biomolecules (DNA).
The interstitial junctions of plasmonic nanostructures are called “hotspots”, which can significantly enhance the SERS signal of surrounding analytes [170]. In addition to enriching analytes, micro/nanorobots can also be combined with hotspots engineering to improve SERS performance. Qiu and colleagues use nanoimprint and rolling origami techniques to fabricate Au/SiO/Fe hierarchically structured tubular microrobot with high-density plasmonic nanostructure-supported hotspots incorporated on its surface, as shown in Fig. 5f [161]. The microrobots can not only actively enrich analytes through magnetic field-driven motion but also act as “mobile hotspots” to enhance the intensity of SERS signals. Magnetic nanorobots based on silica-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles are modified with Ag nanoparticles to serve as SERS probes, where the Ag nanoparticles endow the nanorobots with SERS hotspots [162]. The nanorobots move to the target position under the actuation of external magnetic fields and then rotate to enhance SERS sensing. Moreover, this microrobot has the self-cleaning ability for repeated use and can enter cells through endocytosis to realize SERS sensing of biomolecules in the cytoplasm.
Conclusion and Outlook
The advantages of employing micro/nanorobots in the field of sensing manifest in several key aspects: First, the active motion of micro/nanorobots increases the mixing effect and contact opportunity with the targets, which enhances mass transport and accelerates the reaction rates for sensing [171, 172]. Besides, their tiny size enables detecting microscopic objects and substances with ultra-small sample volumes [81, 173]. Second, micro/nanorobots can be driven by various mechanisms and exhibit diverse types of motion and deformation capabilities. They can adapt to different environments, and these behaviors can serve as indicators for real-time detection and sensing tasks [174]. Among them, swarming micro/nanorobots with environment adaptability can actively navigate in complex environments and collectively map out local conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, concentration), showing advantageous in remotely sensing tasks [175, 176]. Third, the structure, functionality, and actuation behavior of micro/nanorobots can be designed and customized to meet the specific requirements of different sensing tasks [177, 178]. These tiny robots can be applied as a remote sensor across scales, from DNA, proteins, to cells, and bacteria. The sensing objects vary from inorganic metal ions, chemical pollutants, and organic substances to physical and chemical properties of the environment (e.g., liquid viscosity, ion strength, and flow rate). Fourth, micro/nanorobots enable in situ detection. Direct detection of the original samples can be conducted without complex preparations and operations, which simplifies the detection process and reduces the associated costs [179, 180]. Lastly, in a swarm of micro/nanorobots, each individual is capable of directly or indirectly generating detection signals, thereby reducing the randomness of detection results and enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of detection [96, 181].
We categorize sensing schemes based on the different roles of micro/nanorobots in sensing, including self-generated signal-based sensing, robot behavior-based sensing, targets capture and transport for sensing, and micro/nanorobot-assisted sensing (Tables 1 and 2). Self-generated signal-based sensing relies on detecting the robot-generated signals, such as on–off fluorescence detection of toxins and on–off luminescence for chemical sensing. This type of sensing mechanism is widely applied for sensing tasks in medium, and usually relies on the functionalization of robots since chemistry plays an essential role in determining the physicochemical properties of micro/nanorobots. Behavior-based sensing obtains signals from robot behaviors caused by the presence of targets, in which the behaviors can be directly observed using optical microscopy. Currently, most related research focuses on the motion behavior of robots where the working principle relies on establishing a correlation between the motion speed of robots and the target analytes (e.g., type and concentration). Micro/nanorobot’s deformation-based detection, especially swarm transformation-based sensing is a notable research opportunity since micro/nanorobots interact with surrounding environments through deformation, which is an effective method for acquiring information about the environment [182–185]. Benefiting from active motion and diverse functionalization features, micro/nanorobots can selectively capture and transport target analytes, enabling the separation of target analytes from complex samples and simplifying the sensing process. Micro/nanorobots actuated by different types of methods have been developed to provide promising options for various sensing targets and environments. Micro/nanorobots can also assist in common sensing processes by enhancing the micro-mixing effect, accelerating or triggering required reactions, and providing labels for the target analytes. In Table 3, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of these sensing mechanisms and list the critical factors that should be considered when applying these mechanisms to sensing tasks.
Table 3.
Advantages and disadvantages of different sensing mechanisms and critical factors that need consideration for sensing tasks
Sensing mechanisms | Advantages and disadvantages | Critical factors and challenges |
---|---|---|
Self-generated signal | High sensitivity for toxins and chemical sensing | Integrated sensing and actuation capabilities for targeted sensing |
Relatively easy to process signal | Fast signal processing scheme | |
Require robot’s functionalization and modification | Require biocompatible and biodegradable materials | |
Robot behavior | Directly observe robot behaviors in different environments | Require a real-time robot behavior recognition scheme |
No complex functionalization involved | Require a correlation model between robot behavior and target analytes | |
Relatively low sensitivity and larger applications range | Advanced robot design to enhance cross sensitivity | |
Targets capture and transport | On-demand manipulation of targeted analytes | Require a closed-loop operation system |
Separation of target analytes from samples | High manipulation precision | |
Relatively low efficiency for dealing a large amount of sample | Require batch operation or collective control strategy | |
Micro/nanorobot-assisted sensing | Provide enhanced mixing effect to increase sensing efficiency | Require locally controlled active behavior |
Accelerate reactions by active control robots | Trigger required actions in a controlled manner | |
The materials of robot may interference sensing results | Comparison study with and without the robot is required |
Although the fundamental sensing principles remain unchanged, the introduction of micro/nanorobots improves the sensing efficiency and sensitivity with the potential for application in various traditional detection techniques. Although significant progress has been made in the research on micro/nanorobot-based sensing, most of the research work focuses on the design of micro/nanorobots and the exploration of sensing mechanisms, which only stays at the proof-of-concept stage. Building micro/nanorobot-based sensing platforms for wide practical applications is an essential step in the development of this field. Some studies have reported the integration of micro/nanorobots into microchip systems. For example, polymer/Ni/Pt microtubes are used to sequentially capture and transport target antigens and secondary antibodies in a microchip [187]. The system greatly simplifies and accelerates the detection process, enabling the sensing of various analytes, including proteins and bacteria, to be carried out efficiently and conveniently. In an on-chip concentrating system, self-propelled catalytic microrobots functionalized with streptavidin selectively bind with biotinylated components [188]. The microrobots are trapped by V-shaped and ratchet-shaped physical boundaries when moving in a heart-shaped microfluidic chip, and the concentration process is then completed. As shown in Fig. 6a, rGO-based magnetic microrobots are coupled to an electrochemical microfluidic chip for CRP sensing [145]. The antibody-functionalized microrobots perform sandwich immunocomplex with CRP and HRP-labeled anti-CRP secondary antibody in an external reservoir. Subsequently, they are magnetically retained in the metallic channel, where enzymatic substrates flow through, facilitating the process of electrochemical detection. The microrobotic system combined with microfluidic electrochemical detection technology allows automated, accurate, and rapid CRP detection with no loss of performance and sensitivity compared to other work [134] while achieving miniaturization and integration for on-site/bedside clinical analysis. In addition to microchips, micro/nanorobots are integrated into cellphone systems to build fast, portable, and low-cost disease diagnosis tools. Two sensing micro/nanorobots we introduced in Sect. 3, i.e., Pt-base microrobots for Zika virus [80] and HIV-1 RNA [90] sensing, are combined with cellphone-based optical sensing technology. Figure 6b shows the schematic diagram and actual image of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification and microrobot motion (CALM) cellphone system for HIV-1 sensing [90]. Qualitative HIV-1 sensing with a threshold of 1000 virus particles mL−1 and high specificity (99.1%) and sensitivity (94.6%) is achieved using this system without the need for expensive fluorescent optical components. Emaminejad et al. construct an individually addressable ferrobotic system and apply it within a microfluidic architecture framework, as shown in Fig. 6c [186]. Ferrofluid droplets, serving as cargo carriers, are manipulated by the electromagnetic navigation floor and millimeter-scale permanent magnets to perform a variety of microfluidic operations, such as droplet dispensing, generation, merging, and filtering. This multifunctional ferrobotic system is highly robust and enables fully automated quantification of analytes, such as active matrix metallopeptidases in human plasma, through cross-cooperation of ferrobots. Recently, the same group has developed an automated viral sensing platform based on ferrobotic swarms, in which magnetic nanoparticle-spiked droplets are precisely and robustly manipulated by a swarm of individually addressable millimeter-sized magnets (Fig. 6d) [10]. Fluidware, hardware, and software are integrated into the platform, enabling the detection of samples under the guidance of a square matrix pooled testing algorithm. The whole system is only palm-sized and capable of batch sample processing, including transfer, aliquoting, merging, mixing, and heating of sample droplets. This platform is expected to be used as a commercial virus detection tool, which can reduce the cost of reagents and instruments by 10–300 times and three orders of magnitude, respectively. These sensing platforms integrated with micro/nanorobots represent the future direction of development for micro/nanorobot-based sensing, aiming for practicality and commercialization. Therefore, there is a need to develop advanced sensing platforms that fully leverage the advantages of micro/nanorobots, with the potential to revolutionize traditional sensing methods.
Fig. 6.
Micro/nanorobot-based sensing platforms. a Magnetic rGO-based microrobots are integrated into electrochemical microfluidic chips for CRP sensing [145]. Copyright (2020) American Chemical Society. b DNA-engineered Pt microrobots integrated into a cellphone system for HIV-1 sensing [90]. Copyright (2018) Springer Nature. c Multifunctional ferrobotic system for fully automated assay [186]. Copyright (2020) The American Association for the Advancement of Science. d Automated viral sensing platform based on ferrobotic swarms [10]. Copyright (2022) Springer Nature
Most micro/nanorobots-based sensing and detection are currently conducted in vitro. However, there are challenges in controlling and imaging micro/nanorobots within a living body, where the precision of signal detection and observation of robot behavior is hampered by the complex operational environment. Additionally, strategies for the controllable deployment and recycling of the robots need further investigation. Leveraging micro/nanorobots for in vivo monitoring, especially within the complex environments of a living organism, enables real-time acquisition of in vivo information through robot-generated signals and behaviors. This capitalizes on the advantages of their small size and controllable motion. It allows us to gather information about target locations without involving complex procedures, benefiting early disease diagnosis. However, challenges exist in implementing chemical fuel-driven micro/nanorobots for in vivo applications due to potential biocompatibility issues. These challenges can be addressed by developing alternative propulsion methods, such as ultrasound or magnetic propulsion, and employing biocompatible materials (e.g., natural biomimetic templates) for robot fabrication. Additionally, achieving high imaging contrasts is essential for real-time in vivo observation of micro/nanorobots, which requires the integration of diverse medical imaging modalities to visualize the mobile micro/nanorobots and obtain signals for sensing [189–195]. After completing their tasks, strategies for recycling, metabolizing, or degrading the robots should be included in the system design [196]. Currently, most micro/nanorobots are designed for sensing a single target. Developing multifunctional sensing platforms will enable convenient and rapid detection of multiple targets. To overcome these challenges, future efforts will focus on building intelligent sensing platforms that require a series of technological breakthroughs in micro/nanorobots and collaboration across diverse disciplines (Fig. 7). The design and functionalization of micro/nanorobots should be considered as a priority since they play an essential role in defining the suitable actuation type and imaging modality. Given the sensing task and manipulation environment, a strategy for the sensing mechanism and signal processing should be evaluated, which also guides the robot system design. From the perspective of system integration, a trade-off between different factors should be considered to obtain an efficient and sensitive system with a certain level of automation. By continually evaluating the system’s performance for each sensing case, the sensing platform will keep learning and improving itself toward a more intelligent level. With continuous efforts to improve robotic control, functionalization, sensing mechanisms, and system integration, we believe that the research achievements in the lab will lead to widespread real-world sensing applications of micro/nanorobots, significantly enhancing our quality of life.
Fig. 7.
Key factors for designing micro/nanorobots-based intelligent sensing platforms for practical applications
Acknowledgements
Q.W is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation under Project No. 52205590, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Project No. BK20220834, the Start-up Research Fund of Southeast University under Project No. RF1028623098, and the Xiaomi Foundation/Xiaomi Young Talents Program. L.Z is supported by the Research Impact Fund (project no. R4015-21), Research Fellow Scheme (project no. RFS2122-4S03), the EU-Hong Kong Research and Innovation Cooperation Co-funding Mechanism (project no. E-CUHK401/20) from the Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong, the SIAT-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent Systems, and the Multi-Scale Medical Robotics Center (MRC), InnoHK, at the Hong Kong Science Park.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no interest conflict. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Footnotes
Qianqian Wang and Shihao Yang have contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Qianqian Wang, Email: qqwang@seu.edu.cn.
Li Zhang, Email: lizhang@mae.cuhk.edu.hk.
References
- 1.Y. Orooji, H. Sohrabi, N. Hemmat, F. Oroojalian, B. Baradaran et al., An overview on SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and other human coronaviruses and their detection capability via amplification assay, chemical sensing, biosensing, immunosensing, and clinical assays. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 18 (2021). 10.1007/s40820-020-00533-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.L. Alder, K. Greulich, G. Kempe, B. Vieth, Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides: better by GC–MS or LC–MS/MS? Mass Spectrom. Rev. 25(6), 838–865 (2006). 10.1002/mas.20091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.A. Brakat, H. Zhu, Nanocellulose-graphene hybrids: advanced functional materials as multifunctional sensing platform. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 94 (2021). 10.1007/s40820-021-00627-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.W.T. Duan, W. Wang, S. Das, V. Yadav, T.E. Mallouk et al., Synthetic nano- and micromachines in analytical chemistry: sensing, migration, capture, delivery, and separation. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 8, 311–333 (2015). 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071114-040125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.X. Fang, B.Y. Zong, S. Mao, Metal-organic framework-based sensors for environmental contaminant sensing. Nano-Micro Lett. 10, 64 (2018). 10.1007/s40820-018-0218-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.H. Ye, Y. Wang, D.D. Xu, X.J. Liu, S.M. Liu et al., Design and fabrication of micro/nano-motors for environmental and sensing applications. Appl. Mater. Today 23, 101007 (2021). 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101007 [Google Scholar]
- 7.J. Parmar, D. Vilela, K. Villa, J. Wang, S. Sánchez, Micro-and nanomotors as active environmental microcleaners and sensors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(30), 9317–9331 (2018). 10.1021/jacs.8b05762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.L.J. Cai, D.Y. Xu, Z.Y. Zhang, N. Li, Y.J. Zhao, Tailoring functional micromotors for sensing. Research 6, 0044 (2023). 10.34133/research.0044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.L. Kong, J.G. Guan, M. Pumera, Micro-and nanorobots based sensing and biosensing. Curr. Opin. Electroche. 10, 174–182 (2018). 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.06.004 [Google Scholar]
- 10.H.S. Lin, W.Z. Yu, K.A. Sabet, M. Bogumil, Y.C. Zhao et al., Ferrobotic swarms enable accessible and adaptable automated viral testing. Nature 611, 570–577 (2022). 10.1038/s41586-022-05408-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.J.J. Zhuang, J.X. Yin, S.W. Lv, B. Wang, Y. Mu, Advanced “lab-on-a-chip” to detect viruses–Current challenges and future perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron. 163, 112291 (2020). 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.J.Y. Cheong, H. Yu, C.Y. Lee, J.U. Lee, H.J. Choi et al., Fast detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA via the integration of plasmonic thermocycling and fluorescence detection in a portable device. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4(12), 1159–1167 (2020). 10.1038/s41551-020-00654-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Q.Q. Wang, J.C. Zhang, J.F. Yu, J. Lang, Z.Y. Lyu et al., Untethered small-scale machines for microrobotic manipulation: from individual and multiple to collective machines. ACS Nano 17(14), 13081–13109 (2023). 10.1021/acsnano.3c05328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.B. Wang, K. Kostarelos, B.J. Nelson, L. Zhang, Trends in micro-/nanorobotics: materials development, actuation, localization, and system integration for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 33(4), 2002047 (2021). 10.1002/adma.202002047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Z.G. Wu, Y. Chen, D. Mukasa, O.S. Pak, W. Gao, Medical micro/nanorobots in complex media. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(22), 8088–8112 (2020). 10.1039/D0CS00309C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.S. Sánchez, L. Soler, J. Katuri, Chemically powered micro-and nanomotors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(5), 1414–1444 (2015). 10.1002/anie.201406096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.A.A. Solovev, Y.F. Mei, E. Bermúdez Ureña, G.S. Huang, O.G. Schmidt, Catalytic microtubular jet engines self-propelled by accumulated gas bubbles. Small 5(14), 1688–1692 (2009). 10.1002/smll.200900021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.M.E. Ibele, P.E. Lammert, V.H. Crespi, A. Sen, Emergent, collective oscillations of self-mobile particles and patterned surfaces under redox conditions. ACS Nano 4(8), 4845–4851 (2010). 10.1021/nn101289p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.W.F. Paxton, P.T. Baker, T.R. Kline, Y. Wang, T.E. Mallouk et al., Catalytically induced electrokinetics for motors and micropumps. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(46), 14881–14888 (2006). 10.1021/ja0643164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.D.K. Zhou, Y.C. Li, P.T. Xu, L.Q. Ren, G.Y. Zhang et al., Visible-light driven Si-Au micromotors in water and organic solvents. Nanoscale 9(32), 11434–11438 (2017). 10.1039/C7NR04161F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.H. Zhang, W.T. Duan, L. Liu, A. Sen, Depolymerization-powered autonomous motors using biocompatible fuel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(42), 15734–15737 (2013). 10.1021/ja4089549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.H.R. Jiang, N. Yoshinaga, M. Sano, Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(26), 268302 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.268302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.U. Bozuyuk, A. Aghakhani, Y. Alapan, M. Yunusa, P. Wrede et al., Reduced rotational flows enable the translation of surface-rolling microrobots in confined spaces. Nat. Commun. 13, 6289 (2022). 10.1038/s41467-022-34023-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.C.Y. Huang, Z.Y. Lai, X.Y. Wu, T.T. Xu, Multimodal locomotion and cargo transportation of magnetically actuated quadruped soft microrobots. Cyborg. Bionic. Syst. 2022, 0004 (2022). 10.34133/cbsystems.0004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.A. Aghakhani, O. Yasa, P. Wrede, M. Sitti, Acoustically powered surface-slipping mobile microrobots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 3469–3477 (2020). 10.1073/pnas.1920099117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.L.Q. Ren, N. Nama, J.M. McNeill, F. Soto, Z.F. Yan et al., 3D steerable, acoustically powered microswimmers for single-particle manipulation. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax3084 (2019). 10.1126/sciadv.aax3084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.P. Calvo-Marzal, S. Sattayasamitsathit, S. Balasubramanian, J.R. Windmiller, C. Dao et al., Propulsion of nanowire diodes. Chem. Commun. 46(10), 1623–1624 (2010). 10.1039/B925568K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.J. Yan, M. Han, J. Zhang, C. Xu, E. Luijten et al., Reconfiguring active particles by electrostatic imbalance. Nat. Mater. 15(10), 1095–1099 (2016). 10.1038/nmat4696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.R.F. Dong, Y. Hu, Y.F. Wu, W. Gao, B.Y. Ren et al., Visible-light-driven BiOI-based Janus micromotor in pure water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(5), 1722–1725 (2017). 10.1021/jacs.6b09863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.L.L. Xu, F.Z. Mou, H.T. Gong, M. Luo, J.G. Guan, Light-driven micro/nanomotors: from fundamentals to applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(22), 6905–6926 (2017). 10.1039/C7CS00516D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Q.Q. Wang, L. Zhang, External power-driven microrobotic swarm: from fundamental understanding to imaging-guided delivery. ACS Nano 15(1), 149–174 (2021). 10.1021/acsnano.0c07753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.H.J. Zhou, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, S. Pané, L. Zhang, M. Pumera, Magnetically driven micro and nanorobots. Chem. Rev. 121(8), 4999–5041 (2021). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.H.Y. Zhang, Z.S. Li, C.Y. Gao, X.J. Fan, Y.X. Pang et al., Dual responsive biohybrid neutrobots for active target delivery. Sci. Robot 6(52), eaaz9519 (2021). 10.1126/scirobotics.aaz9519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.C.K. Schmidt, M. Medina-Sánchez, R.J. Edmondson, O.G. Schmidt, Engineering microrobots for targeted cancer therapies from a medical perspective. Nat. Commun. 11, 5618 (2020). 10.1038/s41467-020-19322-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.J.H. Li, L. Dekanovsky, B. Khezri, B. Wu, H.J. Zhou et al., Biohybrid micro and nanorobots for intelligent drug delivery. Cyborg. Bionic. Syst. 2022, 9824057 (2022). 10.34133/2022/9824057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.D.K. Zhou, Y. Gao, J.J. Yang, Y.C. Li, G.B. Shao et al., Light-ultrasound driven collective “firework” behavior of nanomotors. Adv. Sci. 5(7), 1800122 (2018). 10.1002/advs.201800122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.B.J. Nelson, I.K. Kaliakatsos, J.J. Abbott, Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 55–85 (2010). 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-010510-103409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.M. Sitti, H. Ceylan, W.Q. Hu, J. Giltinan, M. Turan et al., Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc. IEEE 103(2), 205–224 (2015). 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2385105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.T.L. Li, S.M. Yu, B. Sun, Y.L. Li, X.L. Wang et al., Bioinspired claw-engaged and biolubricated swimming microrobots creating active retention in blood vessels. Sci. Adv. 9(18), eadg4501 (2023). 10.1126/sciadv.adg4501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.M. Ye, Y. Zhou, H.Y. Zhao, X.P. Wang, Magnetic microrobots with folate targeting for drug delivery. Cyborg. Bionic. Syst. 4, 0019 (2023). 10.34133/cbsystems.0019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.S. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, Mobile nanotweezers for active colloidal manipulation. Sci. Robot. 3(14), eaaq0076 (2018). 10.1126/scirobotics.aaq0076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.D.D. Jin, Q.L. Wang, K.F. Chan, N. Xia, H.J. Yang et al., Swarming self-adhesive microgels enabled aneurysm on-demand embolization in physiological blood flow. Sci. Adv. 9(19), 9278 (2023). 10.1126/sciadv.adf9278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.J.J. Wang, R.F. Dong, H.Y. Wu, Y.P. Cai, B.Y. Ren, A review on artificial micro/nanomotors for cancer-targeted delivery, diagnosis, and therapy. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 11 (2020). 10.1007/s40820-019-0350-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.J.X. Li, B. Esteban-Fernández de Ávila, W. Gao, L.F. Zhang, J. Wang, Micro/nanorobots for biomedicine: delivery, surgery, sensing, and detoxification. Sci. Robot. 2(4), eaam6431 (2017). 10.1126/scirobotics.aam6431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Q.Q. Wang, K.F. Chan, K. Schweizer, X.Z. Du, D.D. Jin et al., Ultrasound Doppler-guided real-time navigation of a magnetic microswarm for active endovascular delivery. Sci. Adv. 7(9), eabe5914 (2021). 10.1126/sciadv.abe5914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.J.B. Knight, A. Vishwanath, J.P. Brody, R.H. Austin, Hydrodynamic focusing on a silicon chip: mixing nanoliters in microseconds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(17), 3863 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3863 [Google Scholar]
- 47.L. Soler, V. Magdanz, V.M. Fomin, S. Sanchez, O.G. Schmidt, Self-propelled micromotors for cleaning polluted water. ACS Nano 7(11), 9611–9620 (2013). 10.1021/nn405075d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.J. Orozco, B. Jurado-Sanchez, G. Wagner, W. Gao, R. Vazquez-Duhalt et al., Bubble-propelled micromotors for enhanced transport of passive tracers. Langmuir 30(18), 5082–5087 (2014). 10.1021/la500819r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.F. Soto, E. Karshalev, F.Y. Zhang, B. Esteban Fernandez de Avila, A. Nourhani et al. (2021) Smart materials for microrobots. Chem. Rev. 122(5), 5365–5403. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00999 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50.F. Peng, Y.F. Tu, D.A. Wilson, Micro/nanomotors towards in vivo application: cell, tissue and biofluid. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(17), 5289–5310 (2017). 10.1039/C6CS00885B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.P.L. Venugopalan, B. Esteban-Fernandez de Ávila, M. Pal, A. Ghosh, J. Wang, Fantastic voyage of nanomotors into the cell. ACS Nano 14(8), 9423–9439 (2020). 10.1021/acsnano.0c05217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.A. Molinero-Fernández, M. Moreno-Guzmán, M.A. López, A. Escarpa, Biosensing strategy for simultaneous and accurate quantitative analysis of mycotoxins in food samples using unmodified graphene micromotors. Anal. Chem. 89(20), 10850–10857 (2017). 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.L. Kong, N. Rohaizad, M.Z.M. Nasir, J.G. Guan, M. Pumera, Micromotor-assisted human serum glucose biosensing. Anal. Chem. 91(9), 5660–5666 (2019). 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.J. Kim, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, J. Vyskočil, D. Ruzek, M. Pumera, Plasmonic magnetic nanorobots for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection through electronic readout. Appl. Mater. Today 27, 101402 (2022). 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.F. Serwane, A. Mongera, P. Rowghanian, D.A. Kealhofer, A.A. Lucio et al., In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues. Nat. Med. 14(2), 181–186 (2017). 10.1038/nmeth.4101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.V.d. la Asunción-Nadal, M. Pacheco, B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, Chalcogenides-based tubular micromotors in fluorescent assays. Anal. Chem. 92(13), 9188–9193 (2020). 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01541 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 57.Y.B. Zhang, L. Zhang, L.D. Yang, C.I. Vong, K.F. Chan et al., Real-time tracking of fluorescent magnetic spore–based microrobots for remote detection of C. diff toxins. Sci. Adv. 5(1), eaau9650 (2019). 10.1126/sciadv.aau9650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.M. Liu, Y.Y. Sun, T.P. Wang, Z.R. Ye, H. Zhang et al., A biodegradable, all-polymer micromotor for gas sensing applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 4(25), 5945–5952 (2016). 10.1039/C6TC00971A [Google Scholar]
- 59.B. Esteban-Fernández de Ávila, A. Martín, F. Soto, M.A. Lopez-Ramirez, S. Campuzano et al., Single cell real-time miRNAs sensing based on nanomotors. ACS Nano 9(7), 6756–6764 (2015). 10.1021/acsnano.5b02807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.T. Patino, A. Porchetta, A. Jannasch, A. Lladó, T. Stumpp et al., Self-sensing enzyme-powered micromotors equipped with pH-responsive DNA nanoswitches. Nano Lett. 19(6), 3440–3447 (2019). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.B. Esteban-Fernandez de Ávila, M.A. Lopez-Ramirez, D.F. Báez, A. Jodra, V.V. Singh et al., Aptamer-modified graphene-based catalytic micromotors: off–on fluorescent detection of ricin. ACS Sens. 1(3), 217–221 (2016). 10.1021/acssensors.5b00300 [Google Scholar]
- 62.V.V. Singh, K. Kaufmann, J. Orozco, J. Li, M. Galarnyk et al., Micromotor-based on–off fluorescence detection of sarin and soman simulants. Chem. Commun. 51(56), 11190–11193 (2015). 10.1039/C5CC04120A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.B. Jurado-Sánchez, M. Pacheco, J. Rojo, A. Escarpa, Magnetocatalytic graphene quantum dots Janus micromotors for bacterial endotoxin detection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(24), 6957–6961 (2017). 10.1002/anie.201701396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Á. Molinero-Fernández, A. Jodra, M. Moreno-Guzmán, M.Á. López, A. Escarpa, Magnetic reduced graphene oxide/nickel/platinum nanoparticles micromotors for mycotoxin analysis. Chem. Eur. J. 24(28), 7172–7176 (2018). 10.1002/chem.201706095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.M. Pacheco, B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, Sensitive monitoring of enterobacterial contamination of food using self-propelled Janus microsensors. Anal. Chem. 90(4), 2912–2917 (2018). 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.O. Ergeneman, G. Dogangil, M.P. Kummer, J.J. Abbott, M.K. Nazeeruddin et al., A magnetically controlled wireless optical oxygen sensor for intraocular measurements. IEEE Sens. J. 8(1), 29–37 (2008). 10.1109/JSEN.2007.912552 [Google Scholar]
- 67.O. Ergeneman, G. Chatzipirpiridis, J. Pokki, M. Marin-Suárez, G.A. Sotiriou et al., In vitro oxygen sensing using intraocular microrobots. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59(11), 3104–3109 (2012). 10.1109/TBME.2012.2216264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.H.F. Dong, J.P. Lei, L. Ding, Y.Q. Wen, H.X. Ju et al., MicroRNA: function, detection, and bioanalysis. Chem. Rev. 113(8), 6207–6233 (2013). 10.1021/cr300362f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.S. Shi, J. Chen, X.W. Wang, M.S. Xiao, A.R. Chandrasekaran et al., Biointerface engineering with nucleic acid materials for biosensing applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(37), 2201069 (2022). 10.1002/adfm.202201069 [Google Scholar]
- 70.T.H. Kim, D. Lee, J.W. Choi, Live cell biosensing platforms using graphene-based hybrid nanomaterials. Biosens. Bioelectron. 94, 485–499 (2017). 10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.N. Rohaizad, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, M. Fojt, N.M. Latiff, M. Pumera, Two-dimensional materials in biomedical, biosensing and sensing applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(1), 619–657 (2021). 10.1039/D0CS00150C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.A. Bolotsky, D. Butler, C.Y. Dong, K. Gerace, N.R. Glavin et al., Two-dimensional materials in biosensing and healthcare: from in vitro diagnostics to optogenetics and beyond. ACS Nano 13(9), 9781–9810 (2019). 10.1021/acsnano.9b03632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.M. Sentic, S. Arbault, B. Goudeau, D. Manojlovic, A. Kuhn, L. Bouffier, N. Sojic, Electrochemiluminescent swimmers for dynamic enzymatic sensing. Chem. Commun. 50(71), 10202–10205 (2014). 10.1039/C4CC04105D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.A. Molinero-Fernandez, M. Moreno-Guzmán, L. Arruza, M.A. López, A. Escarpa, Polymer-based micromotor fluorescence immunoassay for on-the move sensitive procalcitonin determination in very low birth weight infants’ plasma. ACS Sens. 5(5), 1336–1344 (2020). 10.1021/acssensors.9b02515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.K. Wang, W.J. Wang, S.H. Pan, Y.M. Fu, B. Dong et al., Fluorescent self-propelled covalent organic framework as a microsensor for nitro explosive detection. Appl. Mater. Today 19, 100550 (2020). 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100550 [Google Scholar]
- 76.D. Kagan, P. Calvo-Marzal, S. Balasubramanian, S. Sattayasamitsathit, K.M. Manesh et al., Chemical sensing based on catalytic nanomotors: motion-based detection of trace silver. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(34), 12082–12083 (2009). 10.1021/ja905142q [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.B. Ezhilan, W. Gao, A. Pei, I. Rozen, R.F. Dong et al., Motion-based threat detection using microrods: experiments and numerical simulations. Nanoscale 7(17), 7833–7840 (2015). 10.1039/C4NR06208F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.J. Wu, S. Balasubramanian, D. Kagan, K.M. Manesh, S. Campuzano et al., Motion-based DNA detection using catalytic nanomotors. Nat. Commun. 1, 36 (2010). 10.1038/ncomms1035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.K. Van Nguyen, S.D. Minteer, DNA-functionalized pt nanoparticles as catalysts for chemically powered micromotors: toward signal-on motion-based DNA biosensor. Chem. Commun. 51(23), 4782–4784 (2015). 10.1039/C4CC10250A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.[M.S. Draz, N.K. Lakshminaraasimulu, S. Krishnakumar, D. Battalapalli, A. Vasan et al., Motion-based immunological detection of Zika virus using Pt nanomotors and a cellphone. ACS Nano 12(6), 5709–5718 (2018). 10.1021/acsnano.8b01515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 81.Y.J. Su, Y. Ge, L.M. Liu, L.N. Zhang, M. Liu et al., Motion-based pH sensing based on the cartridge-case-like micromotor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(6), 4250–4257 (2016). 10.1021/acsami.6b00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.M.T. Li, H. Zhang, M. Liu, B. Dong, Motion-based glucose sensing based on a fish-like enzymeless motor. J. Mater. Chem. C 5(18), 4400–4407 (2017). 10.1039/C7TC01122A [Google Scholar]
- 83.J. Orozco, Victor García-Gradilla, M. D’Agostino, W. Gao, A. Cortés et al., Artificial enzyme-powered microfish for water-quality testing. ACS Nano 7(1), 818–824 (2013). 10.1021/nn305372n [DOI] [PubMed]
- 84.V.V. Singh, K. Kaufmann, B.E.F. de Ávila, M. Uygun, J. Wang, Nanomotors responsive to nerve-agent vapor plumes. Chem. Commun. 52(16), 3360–3363 (2016). 10.1039/C5CC10670B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.J.G.S. Moo, H. Wang, G.J. Zhao, M. Pumera, Biomimetic artificial inorganic enzyme-free self-propelled microfish robot for selective detection of Pb2+ in water. Chem. Eur. J. 20(15), 4292–4296 (2014). 10.1002/chem.201304804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.T. Maric, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, M.Z.M. Nasir, M. Pumera, Platinum halloysite nanoclay nanojets as sensitive and selective mobile nanosensors for mercury detection. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4(2), 1800502 (2019). 10.1002/admt.201800502 [Google Scholar]
- 87.Y.Z. Xie, S.Z. Fu, J. Wu, J.P. Lei, H.X. Ju, Motor-based microprobe powered by bio-assembled catalase for motion detection of DNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 87, 31–37 (2017). 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.S.Z. Fu, X.Q. Zhang, Y.Z. Xie, J. Wu, H.X. Ju, An efficient enzyme-powered micromotor device fabricated by cyclic alternate hybridization assembly for DNA detection. Nanoscale 9(26), 9026–9033 (2017). 10.1039/C7NR01168G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.X.Q. Zhang, C.T. Chen, J. Wu, H.X. Ju, Bubble-propelled jellyfish-like micromotors for DNA sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(14), 13581–13588 (2019). 10.1021/acsami.9b00605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.M.S. Draz, K.M. Kochehbyoki, A. Vasan, D. Battalapalli, A. Sreeram et al., DNA engineered micromotors powered by metal nanoparticles for motion based cellphone diagnostics. Nat. Commun. 9, 4282 (2018). 10.1038/s41467-018-06727-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.L. Wang, T.L. Li, L.Q. Li, J.Y. Wang, W.P. Song et al., Microrocket based viscometer. Ecs J. Solid State Sci. 4(10), S3020 (2015). 10.1149/2.0051510jss [Google Scholar]
- 92.L. Shao, Z.J. Yang, D. Andrén, P. Johansson, M. Käll, Gold nanorod rotary motors driven by resonant light scattering. ACS Nano 9(12), 12542–12551 (2015). 10.1021/acsnano.5b06311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.S. Yuan, Q. Zheng, B.J. Yao, M.C. Wen, W.N. Zhang et al., Bio-compatible miniature viscosity sensor based on optical tweezers. Biomed. Opt. Express 13(3), 1152–1160 (2022). 10.1364/BOE.452615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.A. Ghosh, D. Dasgupta, M. Pal, K.I. Morozov, A.M. Leshansky, A. Ghosh, Helical nanomachines as mobile viscometers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(25), 1705687 (2018). 10.1002/adfm.201705687 [Google Scholar]
- 95.A. Barbot, D. Decanini, G. Hwang, Local flow sensing on helical microrobots for semi-automatic motion adaptation. Int. J. Rob. Res. 39(4), 476–489 (2020). 10.1177/0278364919894374 [Google Scholar]
- 96.H. Chen, Y.B. Wang, Y.Z. Liu, Q. Zou, J.F. Yu, Sensing of fluidic features using colloidal microswarms. ACS Nano 16(10), 16281–16291 (2022). 10.1021/acsnano.2c05281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, J. Wang, Lighting up micromotors with quantum dots for smart chemical sensing. Chem. Commun. 51(74), 14088–14091 (2015). 10.1039/C5CC04726A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.K. Villa, C.L. Manzanares Palenzuela, Z. Sofer, S. Matějková, M. Pumera, Metal-free visible-light photoactivated C3N4 bubble-propelled tubular micromotors with inherent fluorescence and on/off capabilities. ACS Nano 12(12), 12482–12491 (2018). 10.1021/acsnano.8b06914 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 99.Y. Yuan, C.Y. Gao, D.L. Wang, C. Zhou, B.H. Zhu et al., Janus-micromotor-based on–off luminescence sensor for active TNT detection. Beilstein J. Nanotech. 10(1), 1324–1331 (2019). 10.3762/bjnano.10.131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Z.H. Wang, G.C. Fang, Z.H. Gao, Y.K. Liao, C.Y. Gong et al., Autonomous microlasers for profiling extracellular vesicles from cancer spheroids. Nano Lett. 23(7), 2502–2510 (2023). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.S. Campuzano, D. Kagan, J. Orozco, J. Wang, Motion-driven sensing and biosensing using electrochemically propelled nanomotors. Analyst 136(22), 4621–4630 (2011). 10.1039/C1AN15599G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.L.M. Liu, Y.G. Dong, Y.Y. Sun, M. Liu, Y.J. Su et al., Motion-based pH sensing using spindle-like micromotors. Nano Res. 9, 1310–1318 (2016). 10.1007/s12274-016-1026-9 [Google Scholar]
- 103.S. Solé, A. Merkoçi, S. Alegret, Determination of toxic substances based on enzyme inhibition. part I. electrochemical biosensors for the determination of pesticides using batch procedures. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 33(2), 89–126 (2003). 10.1080/727072334
- 104.S.H. Yang, Q.Q. Wang, D.D. Jin, X.Z. Du, L. Zhang, Probing fast transformation of magnetic colloidal microswarms in complex fluids. ACS Nano 16(11), 19025–19037 (2022). 10.1021/acsnano.2c07948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.M.M. Sun, B. Hao, S.H. Yang, X. Wang, C. Majidi et al., Exploiting ferrofluidic wetting for miniature soft machines. Nat. Commun. 13, 7919 (2022). 10.1038/s41467-022-35646-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.J.F. Yu, L.D. Yang, X.Z. Du, H. Chen, T. Xu et al., Adaptive pattern and motion control of magnetic microrobotic swarms. IEEE Trans. Robot. 38(3), 1552–1570 (2021). 10.1109/TRO.2021.3130432 [Google Scholar]
- 107.W.M. Jing, D.J. Cappelleri, A magnetic microrobot with in situ force sensing capabilities. Robotics 3(2), 106–119 (2014). 10.3390/robotics3020106 [Google Scholar]
- 108.W.M. Jing, D.J. Cappelleri, Micro-force sensing mobile microrobots. Proc. SPIE 9494, 949405 (2015). 10.1117/12.2183259 [Google Scholar]
- 109.M. You, C.R. Chen, L.L. Xu, F.Z. Mou, J.G. Guan, Intelligent micro/nanomotors with taxis. Accounts. Chem. Res. 51(12), 3006–3014 (2018). 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.F.T. Ji, Y.L. Wu, M. Pumera, L. Zhang, Collective behaviors of active matter learning from natural taxes across scales. Adv. Mater. 35(8), 2203959 (2023). 10.1002/adma.202203959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.M.N. Popescu, W.E. Uspal, C. Bechinger, P. Fischer, Chemotaxis of active Janus nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 18(9), 5345–5349 (2018). 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.J.X. Li, W.J. Liu, J.Y. Wang, I. Rozen, S. He et al., Nanoconfined atomic layer deposition of TiO2/Pt nanotubes: toward ultrasmall highly efficient catalytic nanorockets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(24), 1700598 (2017). 10.1002/adfm.201700598 [Google Scholar]
- 113.Y.Y. Hong, N.M. Blackman, N.D. Kopp, A. Sen, D. Velegol, Chemotaxis of nonbiological colloidal rods. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(17), 178103 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.178103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.K.K. Dey, S. Bhandari, D. Bandyopadhyay, S. Basu, A. Chattopadhyay, The pH taxis of an intelligent catalytic microbot. Small 9(11), 1916–1920 (2013). 10.1002/smll.201202312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.F.Z. Mou, Q. Xie, J.F. Liu, S.P. Che, L. Bahmane et al., ZnO-based micromotors fueled by CO2: the first example of self-reorientation-induced biomimetic chemotaxis. Natl. Sci. Rev. 8(11), nqab066 (2021). 10.1093/nsr/nwab066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.R.D. Vale, The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell 112(4), 467–480 (2003). 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00111-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.G.D. Bachand, H. Hess, B. Ratna, P. Satir, V. Vogel, “Smart dust” biosensors powered by biomolecular motors. Lab Chip 9(12), 1661–1666 (2009). 10.1039/B821055A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.C.T. Lin, M.T. Kao, K. Kurabayashi, E. Meyhofer, Self-contained, biomolecular motor-driven protein sorting and concentrating in an ultrasensitive microfluidic chip. Nano Lett. 8(4), 1041–1046 (2008). 10.1021/nl072742x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.T. Fischer, A. Agarwal, H. Hess, A smart dust biosensor powered by kinesin motors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4(3), 162–166 (2009). 10.1038/nnano.2008.393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.C. Schmidt, V. Vogel, Molecular shuttles powered by motor proteins: loading and unloading stations for nanocargo integrated into one device. Lab Chip 10(17), 2195–2198 (2010). 10.1039/C005241H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.S. Hiyama, T. Inoue, T. Shima, Y. Moritani, T. Suda et al., Autonomous loading, transport, and unloading of specified cargoes by using DNA hybridization and biological motor-based motility. Small 4(4), 410–415 (2008). 10.1002/smll.200700528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.D. Kagan, S. Campuzano, S. Balasubramanian, F. Kuralay, G.U. Flechsig et al., Functionalized micromachines for selective and rapid isolation of nucleic acid targets from complex samples. Nano Lett. 11(5), 2083–2087 (2011). 10.1021/nl2005687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.S. Balasubramanian, D. Kagan, C.M. Jack Hu, S. Campuzano, M.J. Lobo-Castañon et al., Micromachine-enabled capture and isolation of cancer cells in complex media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(18), 4161–4164 (2011). 10.1002/anie.201100115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 124.C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, J. Vyskočil, F. Novotný, P. Bednar, D. Ruzek et al., Collective behavior of magnetic microrobots through immuno-sandwich assay: On-the-fly COVID-19 sensing. Appl. Mater. Today 26, 101337 (2022). 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.V. Garcia-Gradilla, J. Orozco, S. Sattayasamitsathit, F. Soto, F. Kuralay et al., Functionalized ultrasound-propelled magnetically guided nanomotors: toward practical biomedical applications. ACS Nano 7(10), 9232–9240 (2013). 10.1021/nn403851v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.M. Urso, M. Ussia, F. Novotný, M. Pumera, Trapping and detecting nanoplastics by MXene-derived oxide microrobots. Nat. Commun. 13, 3573 (2022). 10.1038/s41467-022-31161-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.J. Wang, Can man-made nanomachines compete with nature biomotors? ACS Nano 3(1), 4–9 (2009). 10.1021/nn800829k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.M. Zarei, M. Zarei, Self-propelled micro/nanomotors for sensing and environmental remediation. Small 14(30), 1800912 (2018). 10.1002/smll.201800912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.J. Simmchen, A. Baeza, D. Ruiz, M.J. Esplandiu, M. Vallet- Regí, Asymmetric hybrid silica nanomotors for capture and cargo transport: towards a novel motion-based DNA sensor. Small 8(13), 2053–2059 (2012). 10.1002/smll.201101593 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 130.J. Orozco, S. Campuzano, D. Kagan, M. Zhou, W. Gao et al., Dynamic isolation and unloading of target proteins by aptamer-modified microtransporters. Anal. Chem. 83(20), 7962–7969 (2011). 10.1021/ac202029k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.J. Orozco, A. Cortés, G. Cheng, S. Sattayasamitsathit, W. Gao et al., Molecularly imprinted polymer-based catalytic micromotors for selective protein transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(14), 5336–5339 (2013). 10.1021/ja4018545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.E. Ma, K. Wang, H. Wang, An immunoassay based on nanomotor-assisted electrochemical response for the detection of immunoglobulin. Microchim. Acta 189(1), 47 (2022). 10.1007/s00604-021-05158-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, M. Pumera, Self-propelled tags for protein detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(6), 1906449 (2020). 10.1002/adfm.201906449 [Google Scholar]
- 134.Á. Molinero- Fernández, L. Arruza, M.Á. López, A. Escarpa, On-the-fly rapid immunoassay for neonatal sepsis diagnosis: C-reactive protein accurate determination using magnetic graphene-based micromotors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 158, 112156 (2020). 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112156 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 135.C.Y. Liang, C. Zhan, F.Y. Zeng, D.D. Xu, Y. Wang et al., Bilayer tubular micromotors for simultaneous environmental monitoring and remediation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(41), 35099–35107 (2018). 10.1021/acsami.8b10921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.V. Zieglschmid, C. Hollmann, O. Böcher, Detection of disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood. Crit. Rev. Cl. Lab. Sci. 42(2), 155–196 (2005). 10.1080/10408360590913696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.F. Kuralay, S. Sattayasamitsathit, W. Gao, A. Uygun, A. Katzenberg et al., Self-propelled carbohydrate-sensitive microtransporters with built-in boronic acid recognition for isolating sugars and cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(37), 15217–15220 (2012). 10.1021/ja306080t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.H. Fang, G. Kaur, B.H. Wang, Progress in boronic acid-based fluorescent glucose sensors. J. Fluoresc. 14, 481–489 (2004). 10.1023/B:JOFL.0000039336.51399.3b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.S. Park, H. Boo, T.D. Chung, Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors. Anal. Chim. Acta 556(1), 46–57 (2006). 10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.S. Campuzano, J. Orozco, D. Kagan, M. Guix, W. Gao et al., Bacterial isolation by lectin-modified microengines. Nano Lett. 12(1), 396–401 (2012). 10.1021/nl203717q [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.O.A. Loaiza, P.J. Lamas-Ardisana, E. Jubete, E. Ochoteco, I. Loinaz et al., Nanostructured disposable impedimetric sensors as tools for specific biomolecular interactions: sensitive recognition of concanavalin A. Anal. Chem. 83(8), 2987–2995 (2011). 10.1021/ac103108m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Y. Gogotsi, B. Anasori, The rise of MXenes. ACS Nano 13(8), 8491–8494 (2019). 10.1021/acsnano.9b06394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.K. Villa, F. Novotny, J. Zelenka, M.P. Browne, T. Ruml et al., Visible-light-driven single-component BiVO4 micromotors with the autonomous ability for capturing microorganisms. ACS Nano 13(7), 8135–8145 (2019). 10.1021/acsnano.9b03184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.S. Debata, N.A. Kherani, S.K. Panda, D.P. Singh, Light-driven microrobots: capture and transport of bacteria and microparticles in a fluid medium. J. Mater. Chem. B 10(40), 8235–8243 (2022). 10.1039/D2TB01367C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Á. Molinero-Fernández, M.Á. López, A. Escarpa, Electrochemical microfluidic micromotors-based immunoassay for C-reactive protein determination in preterm neonatal samples with sepsis suspicion. Anal. Chem. 92(7), 5048–5054 (2020). 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.E. Morales-Narváez, M. Guix, M. Medina-Sánchez, C.C. Mayorga-Martinez, A. Merkoçi, Micromotor enhanced microarray technology for protein detection. Small 10(13), 2542–2548 (2014). 10.1002/smll.201303068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Q.R. Xiong, A.E. Lim, Y. Lim, Y.C. Lam, H.W. Duan, Dynamic magnetic nanomixers for improved microarray assays by eliminating diffusion limitation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8(6), 1801022 (2019). 10.1002/adhm.201801022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Y. Zhang, D.A. Gregory, Y. Zhang, P.J. Smith, S.J. Ebbens et al., Reactive inkjet printing of functional silk stirrers for enhanced mixing and sensing. Small 15(1), 1804213 (2019). 10.1002/smll.201804213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.S. Cinti, G. Valdés-Ramírez, W. Gao, J.X. Li, G. Palleschi et al., Microengine-assisted electrochemical measurements at printable sensor strips. Chem. Commun. 51(41), 8668–8671 (2015). 10.1039/C5CC02222C [DOI] [PubMed]
- 150.D. Rojas, B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, “Shoot and sense” Janus micromotors-based strategy for the simultaneous degradation and detection of persistent organic pollutants in food and biological samples. Anal. Chem. 88(7), 4153–4160 (2016). 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.C. Lu, X.J. Liu, Y.F. Li, F. Yu, L.H. Tang et al., Multifunctional Janus hematite–silica nanoparticles: mimicking peroxidase-like activity and sensitive colorimetric detection of glucose. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(28), 15395–15402 (2015). 10.1021/acsami.5b03423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.M. Moreno-Guzman, A. Jodra, M.A. López, A. Escarpa, Self-propelled enzyme-based motors for smart mobile electrochemical and optical biosensing. Anal. Chem. 87(24), 12380–12386 (2015). 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.B.E.F. de Ávila, M. Zhao, S. Campuzano, F. Ricci, J.M. Pingarrón et al., Rapid micromotor-based naked-eye immunoassay. Talanta 167, 651–657 (2017). 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.02.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.R. María-Hormigos, B. Jurado- Sánchez, A. Escarpa, Self-propelled micromotors for naked-eye detection of phenylenediamines isomers. Anal. Chem. 90(16), 9830–9837 (2018). 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01860 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 155.M. Palacios-Corella, D. Rojas, M. Pumera, Photocatalytic Pt/Ag3VO4 micro-motors with inherent sensing capabilities for corroding environments. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 631, 125–134 (2023). 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.B. Guven, N. Basaran-Akgul, E. Temur, U. Tamer, İH. Boyacı, SERS-based sandwich immunoassay using antibody coated magnetic nanoparticles for Escherichia coli enumeration. Analyst 136(4), 740–748 (2011). 10.1039/C0AN00473A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.D. Han, Y.F. Fang, D.Y. Du, G.S. Huang, T. Qiu et al., Automatic molecular collection and detection by using fuel-powered microengines. Nanoscale 8(17), 9141–9145 (2016). 10.1039/C6NR00117C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.F. Novotnỳ, J. Plutnar, M. Pumera, Plasmonic self-propelled nanomotors for explosives detection via solution-based surface enhanced Raman scattering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(33), 1903041 (2019). 10.1002/adfm.201903041 [Google Scholar]
- 159.Y. Wang, C. Zhou, W. Wang, D.D. Xu, F.Y. Zeng et al., Photocatalytically powered matchlike nanomotor for light-guided active SERS sensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 130(40), 13294–13297 (2018). 10.1002/anie.201807033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.T.L. Xu, Y. Luo, C.H. Liu, X.J. Zhang, S.T. Wang, Integrated ultrasonic aggregation-induced enrichment with Raman enhancement for ultrasensitive and rapid biosensing. Anal. Chem. 92(11), 7816–7821 (2020). 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.X.C. Fan, Q. Hao, M.Z. Li, X.Y. Zhang, X.Z. Yang et al., Hotspots on the move: active molecular enrichment by hierarchically structured micromotors for ultrasensitive SERS sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(25), 28783–28791 (2020). 10.1021/acsami.0c05371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Y. Wang, Y.H. Liu, Y. Li, D.D. Xu, X. Pan et al., Magnetic nanomotor-based maneuverable SERS probe. Research 2020, 7962024 (2020). 10.34133/2020/7962024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 163.K. Xiong, J.W. Lin, Q. Chen, T.Y. Gao, L.L. Xu et al., An axis-asymmetric self-driven micromotor that can perform precession multiplying “on-the-fly” mass transfer. Matter 6(3), 907–924 (2023). 10.1016/j.matt.2023.01.005 [Google Scholar]
- 164.E.F. Petricoin III., J.L. Hackett, L.J. Lesko, R.K. Puri, S.I. Gutman et al., Medical applications of microarray technologies: a regulatory science perspective. Nat. Genet. 32(Suppl 4), 474–479 (2002). 10.1038/ng1029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.T.J. Albert, M.N. Molla, D.M. Muzny, L. Nazareth, D. Wheeler et al., Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat. Med. 4(11), 903–905 (2007). 10.1038/nmeth1111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.F.Z. Mou, C.R. Chen, Q. Zhong, Y.X. Yin, H.R. Ma et al., Autonomous motion and temperature-controlled drug delivery of Mg/Pt-poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) Janus micromotors driven by simulated body fluid and blood plasma. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(12), 9897–9903 (2014). 10.1021/am502729y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.S.M. Nie, S.R. Emory, Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 275(5303), 1102–1106 (1997). 10.1126/science.275.5303.1102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.S.Y. Ding, J. Yi, J.F. Li, B. Ren, D.Y. Wu et al., Nanostructure-based plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for surface analysis of materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16021 (2016). 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.21 [Google Scholar]
- 169.J.F. Li, Y.F. Huang, Y. Ding, Z.L. Yang, S.B. Li et al., Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nature 464(7287), 392–395 (2010). 10.1038/nature08907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.E. Hutter, J.H. Fendler, Exploitation of localized surface plasmon resonance. Adv. Mater. 16(19), 1685–1706 (2004). 10.1002/adma.200400271 [Google Scholar]
- 171.F. Risso, Agitation, mixing, and transfers induced by bubbles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 25–48 (2018). 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045003 [Google Scholar]
- 172.Q.Q. Wang, D.D. Jin, B. Wang, N. Xia, H. Ko et al., Reconfigurable magnetic microswarm for accelerating tPA-mediated thrombolysis under ultrasound imaging. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 27(4), 2267–2277 (2022). 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3103994 [Google Scholar]
- 173.W.W. Gao, B.E.F. de Ávila, L.F. Zhang, J. Wang, Targeting and isolation of cancer cells using micro/nanomotors. Adv. Drug. Deliver. Rev. 125, 94–101 (2018). 10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.M. Pal, N. Somalwar, A. Singh, R. Bhat, S.M. Eswarappa et al., Maneuverability of magnetic nanomotors inside living cells. Adv. Mater. 30(22), 1800429 (2018). 10.1002/adma.201800429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.L.L. Li, Z. Yu, J.F. Liu, M.Y. Yang, G.P. Shi et al., Swarming responsive photonic nanorobots for motile-targeting microen-vironmental mapping and mapping-guided photothermal treatment. Nano-Micro Lett. 15(1), 141 (2023). 10.1007/s40820-023-01095-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Z. Yu, L.L. Li, F.Z. Mou, S.M. Yu, D. Zhang et al., Swarming magnetic photonic-crystal microrobots with on-the-fly visual pH detection and self-regulated drug delivery. InfoMat 5(10), e12464 (2023). 10.1002/inf2.12464 [Google Scholar]
- 177.Z.M. Li, X.Y. Yi, J.K. Yang, L. Bian, Z.H. Yu et al., Designing artificial vibration modes of piezoelectric devices using programmable, 3D ordered structure with piezoceramic strain units. Adv. Mater. 34(2), 2107236 (2022). 10.1002/adma.202107236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.K.S. Yuan, C. Cuntín-Abal, B. Jurado-Sánchez, A. Escarpa, Smartphone-based Janus micromotors strategy for motion-based detection of Glutathione. Anal. Chem. 93(49), 16385–16392 (2021). 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 179.Y.F. Zhang, F. Yang, W. Wei, Y.Y. Wang, S.S. Yang et al., Self-propelled Janus mesoporous micromotor for enhanced microRNA capture and amplified detection in complex biological samples. ACS Nano 16(4), 5587–5596 (2022). 10.1021/acsnano.1c10437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.L.J. Cai, D.Y. Xu, H.X. Chen, L. Wang, Y.J. Zhao, Designing bioactive micro-/nanomotors for engineered regeneration. Eng. Regen. 2, 109–115 (2021). 10.1016/j.engreg.2021.09.003 [Google Scholar]
- 181.X. Wang, T.C. Wang, X. Chen, J.H. Law, G.Q. Shan et al., Microrobotic swarms for intracellular measurement with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. ACS Nano 16(7), 10824–10839 (2022). 10.1021/acsnano.2c02938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Y.B. Wang, H. Chen, J.H. Law, X.Z. Du, J.F. Yu, Ultrafast miniature robotic swimmers with upstream motility. Cyborg. Bionic. Syst. 4, 0015 (2023). 10.34133/cbsystems.0015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 183.Q.Q. Wang, N. Xiang, J. Lang, B. Wang, D.D. Jin et al., Reconfigurable liquid-bodied miniature machines: Magnetic control and microrobotic applications. Adv. Intell. Syst. (2023). 10.1002/aisy.202300108 [Google Scholar]
- 184.Z.Y. Ren, R.J. Zhang, R.H. Soon, Z.M. Liu, W.Q. Hu et al., Soft-bodied adaptive multimodal locomotion strategies in fluid-filled confined spaces. Sci. Adv. 7(27), eabh2022 (2021). 10.1126/sciadv.abh2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.J.C. Zhang, Z.Y. Ren, W.Q Hu, R.H. Soon, I.C. Yasa et al., Voxelated three-dimensional miniature magnetic soft machines via multimaterial heterogeneous assembly. Sci. Robot. 6(53) (2021). 10.1126/scirobotics.abf0112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 186.W.Z. Yu, H.S. Lin, Y.L. Wang, X. He, N. Chen et al., A ferrobotic system for automated microfluidic logistics. Sci. Robot. 5(39), eaba4411 (2020). 10.1126/scirobotics.aba4411 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 187.M. García, J. Orozco, M. Guix, W. Gao, S. Sattayasamitsathit et al., Micromotor-based lab-on-chip immunoassays. Nanoscale 5(4), 1325–1331 (2013). 10.1039/C2NR32400H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.L. Restrepo-Pérez, L. Soler, C. Martínez-Cisneros, S. S´anchez, O.G. Schmidt, Biofunctionalized self-propelled micromotors as an alternative on-chip concen-trating system. Lab Chip 14(16), 2914–2917 (2014). 10.1039/C4LC00439F [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 189.M.Y. Yang, X. Guo, F.Z. Mou, J.G. Guan, Lighting up micro-/nanorobots with fluorescence. Chem. Rev. 123(7), 3944–3975 (2022). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Q.Q. Wang, X.Z. Du, D.D. Jin, L. Zhang, Real-time ultrasound doppler tracking and autonomous navigation of a miniature helical robot for accelerating thrombolysis in dynamic blood flow. ACS Nano 16(1), 604–616 (2022). 10.1021/acsnano.1c07830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.S. Jeon, S. Kim, S. Ha, S. Lee, E. Kim et al., Magnetically actuated microrobots as a platform for stem cell transplantation. Sci. Robot. 4(30), aav4317 (2019). 10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 192.D.F. Li, C. Liu, Y.Y. Yang, L.D. Wang, Y.J. Shen, Micro-rocket robot with all-optic actuating and tracking in blood. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 84 (2020). 10.1038/s41377-020-0323-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.L.S. Xie, X. Pang, X.H. Yan, Q.X. Dai, H.R. Lin et al., Photoacoustic imaging-trackable magnetic microswimmers for pathogenic bacterial infection treatment. ACS Nano 14(3), 2880–2893 (2020). 10.1021/acsnano.9b06731 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Z.G. Wu, L. Li, Y.R, Yang, P. Hu, Y. Li et al., A microrobotic system guided by photoacoustic computed tomography for targeted navigation in intestines in vivo. Sci. Robot. 4(32), eaax0613 (2019). 10.1126/scirobotics.aax0613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 195.Q.Q. Wang, L.D. Yang, J.F. Yu, P.W.Y. Chiu, Y.P. Zheng et al., Real-time magnetic navigation of a rotating colloidal microswarm under ultrasound guidance. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 67(12), 3403–3412 (2020). 10.1109/TBME.2020.2987045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.J. Llacer-Wintle, A. Rivas-Dapena, X.Z. Chen, E. Pellicer, B.J. Nelson et al., Biodegradable small-scale swimmers for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 33(42), 2102049 (2021). 10.1002/adma.202102049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]