Abstract
The management of bacterial pathogens remains a key challenge of aquaculture. The marine gammaproteobacterium Piscirickettsia salmonis is the etiological agent of piscirickettsiosis and causes multi-systemic infections in different salmon species, resulting in considerable mortality and substantial commercial losses. Here, we elucidate its global diversity, evolution, and selection during human interventions. Our comprehensive analysis of 73 closed, high quality genome sequences covered strains from major outbreaks and was supplemented by an analysis of all P. salmonis 16S rRNA gene sequences and metagenomic reads available in public databases. Genome comparison showed that Piscirickettsia comprises at least three distinct, genetically isolated species of which two showed evidence for continuing speciation. However, at least twice the number of species exist in marine fish or seawater. A hallmark of Piscirickettsia diversification is the unprecedented amount and diversity of transposases which are particularly active in subgroups undergoing rapid speciation and are key to the acquisition of novel genes and to pseudogenization. Several group-specific genes are involved in surface antigen synthesis and may explain the differences in virulence between strains. However, the frequent failure of antibiotic treatment of piscirickettsiosis outbreaks cannot be explained by horizontal acquisition of resistance genes which so far occurred only very rarely. Besides revealing a dynamic diversification of an important pathogen, our study also provides the data for improving its surveillance, predicting the emergence of novel lineages, and adapting aquaculture management, and thereby contributes towards the sustainability of salmon farming.
Subject terms: Bacterial genetics, Comparative genomics, Bacterial evolution, Marine microbiology, Bacterial genomics
Introduction
The marine gammaproteobacterium Piscirickettsia salmonis was the first Gram-negative intracellular pathogenic bacterium isolated from fish. It was described more than 30 years ago during a severe disease outbreak among farmed coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in southern Chile where it caused a high mortality of fish stocks [1–3]. From 1991 onwards, the disease was also reported by salmon farms in Norway [4], Scotland and Ireland [5], and Canada [6–8]. P. salmonis (Fig. 1A) is the etiological agent of piscirickettsiosis, which continues to be the most prevalent and most lethal bacterial disease of farmed salmon in southern Chile [9], with an overall economic loss reaching US$ 500 million per year [10]. P. salmonis causes a systemic infection, particularly in salmonids, by replicating in membrane-bound cytoplasmic vacuoles of infected macrophages and inducing apoptosis [11] (Fig. 1B). Diseased fish exhibit anemia, pale gills, lesions of the skin and liver (Fig. 1C), discolored swollen kidneys and enlarged spleens, necrosis of the intestine, as well as pathological changes in the brain, heart, and ovary [2, 12]. Antibiotic treatments often fail despite the high doses that are used to combat piscirickettsiosis in aquaculture [10, 13], also raising concerns of the horizontal spread of resistance genes.
The genus Piscirickettsia and the family Piscirickettsiaceae, is still formally assigned to the order Thiotrichales, although the latter order is not a monophyletic group [14]. Both, SILVA 16S rRNA and Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) taxonomies separate the Piscirickettsiaceae into their own order, the Piscirickettsiales [15, 16]. In a recent phylogenomic study of the Gammaproteobacteria, Piscirickettsia genomes form a sister lineage to the Legionellales [17].
For the successful prevention and treatment of P. salmonis infections, the divergence, evolutionary dynamics, host specificity, and adaptation to interventions of this pathogen must be elucidated [13, 18]. So far, these questions could not be sufficiently addressed since only a very limited number of P. salmonis genomes were available [19], only single features were studied in different isolates [6, 20–24], and most strains later were not accessible for follow-up comparisons. The present analysis covers the by far largest data set of high-quality, closed P. salmonis genomes generated to date comprising 73 genome sequences, including 55 de novo sequenced genomes of publicly available strains from the new Chilean National Piscirickettsia salmonis Strain Collection and originating from Chile, Canada, and Norway.
Materials and methods
Detailed Materials and Methods can be found in the Supplementary Information (SI).
The complete genome sequences of 51 Chilean, three Canadian and one Norwegian P. salmonis isolate sampled from farmed salmonids between 1989 and 2018 were determined in a hybrid approach using long and short read sequencing (SI 1.1–1.3). They were complemented by 18 high quality genomes of Chilean P. salmonis isolates and draft genomes of two isolates from New Zealand and one from Hawaii, which were previously published (SI 1.3).
In addition to an initial automatic annotation, coding sequences (CDSs) of special interest were manually analyzed (SI 1.3), and possible virulence factors (SI 1.4), restriction-modification systems (SI 1.4), resistance genes (SI 1.5), and transposases (SI 1.8) were identified by comparison against specific databases. Detection of potential pseudogenes was performed by comparison of consecutive CDSs to identify frameshift fragments, by comparison of lengths of homologous CDSs to identify truncated genes, and by searches for potential gene fragments in intergenic regions (SI 1.4).
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ten different antibiotics were determined for 20 P. salmonis isolates, ten from the LF and ten from the EM genogroup (SI 1.5).
The core and pan genomes were calculated based on the homology of the CDSs of the 73 complete genomes (SI 1.4). The phylogenetic breadth of the genus Piscirickettsia was assessed using a Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences from the 73 genomes and all publicly available Piscirickettsia 16S rRNA gene sequences (SI 1.6). A genome phylogeny for all complete genomes in the study was reconstructed by ML using a recombination-corrected supermatrix of the concatenated alignments of all single-copy core CDSs (SI 1.6). The phylogeny for the Icm/Dot secretion system was reconstructed from the concatenated icm/dot gene alignments, also using ML (SI 1.6). To examine species affiliation, digital DNA-DNA Hybridization (dDDH) and Average Nucleotide Identities were calculated (SI 1.6) and the extent of recombination between the genomes was estimated (SI 1.7).
Transposase genes identified in the Piscirickettsia genomes were clustered by nucleotide identity, tight clusters with a common ancestor termed transposase types, and origins of transposase types analyzed by comparison against database sequences (SI 1.8). Recent transposase activity was inferred from comparisons of neighboring genes (SI 1.8), chromosome structure and gene order conservation within and between genogroups (SI 1.7).
Extrachromosomal elements (ECEs) were grouped into clusters according to their distance in a tree reconstructed from amino acid sequences. Potential homologous contigs were determined by database searches and the core content, phage content, and the presence of factors required for plasmid mobilization were examined (SI 1.8).
A branch-site model was employed to detect putative positive selection in families of homologous genes. A codon site specific approach was used to identify nucleotide positions in transposase genes exhibiting signs of purifying or diversifying selection during expansion in a single genome (SI 1.9). Gene gains and losses within specific COG categories were modeled using an ML approach. Ancestral character states for the numbers of genes and pseudogenes per homolog group and the number of extrachromosomal elements per genome were reconstructed using maximum parsimony. The correlation between the number of transposase genes and the pseudogene content within genomes was tested with a regression model (SI 1.9).
Tip-permutation tests were performed to test whether the observed character states for geographic origin, year of isolation, and host species of the Piscirickettsia isolates were distributed randomly over the topologies of the reconstructed phylogenetic trees. Results are given as p-values and retention index RI (SI 1.10). In order to determine the spread of Piscirickettsia in the oceans, metagenomes in databases were searched for matching sequences (SI 1.10).
Results and discussion
Genetic isolation causes divergence of Piscirickettsia genomes through multiple and ongoing speciation events
Sizes of the 73 P. salmonis genomes (Supplementary Table S1) ranged from 3.25 to 4.15 Mb and chromosome lengths from 3.04 to 3.58 Mb (Supplementary Table S2). Thus, P. salmonis has not undergone the extensive genome erosion observed in related intracellular pathogens of the Legionellales (1.7–2.83 Mb; SI 2.1). Between 3033 and 4025 coding sequences (CDSs) were predicted for chromosomes. The highest values were observed for Canadian strains (Supplementary Table S2). 1767 CDSs were present in all sequenced P. salmonis genomes. This core genome was well covered by our set of strains considering the asymptotic accumulation curve of orthologs (Supplementary Fig. S1). The pan genome was open and comprised 6504 CDSs, mostly due to the four non-Chilean isolates which contributed 1466 additional CDSs.
Previously, two P. salmonis clades (LF and EM) had been detected based on sequence comparisons of ribosomal genes [25] and of 19 published genomes [19]. However, additional strains of P. salmonis were isolated in Europe and North America [4–6, 8] some of which may represent distinct lineages [5]. Our 73 genomes actually grouped in three distinct and highly supported genogroups (Fig. 1D). The majority of sequences were members of the previously established LF (Fig. 1E) and EM genogroups (Fig. 1F), whereas the four Norwegian and Canadian isolates formed a separate (NC) genogroup that is related to the Chilean LF isolates and in which Canadian strains constitute a distinct subgroup. Most importantly, the present study covered a much larger number of EM isolates than any previous investigation [19, 26], and allowed the detection of four well-separated EM subgroups (EM1 to EM4) with high bootstrap support (Fig. 1F). Three additional, but incomplete genome sequences from New Zealand (Piscirickettsiaceae bacterium NZ-RLO1 and NZ-RLO2) and Hawaii (Piscirickettsia litoralis´ strain Y2) that had sufficient genome completeness (89–97% of the core genome detected) either grouped with the EM genogroup (NZ-RLO2) or were only distantly related to the established genogroups (Y2, NZ-RLO1) (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Pairwise Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values for comparisons between the LF, EM, and NC genogroups indicated that they represent up to three separate species. Since the ANI values were right at the threshold of species demarcation, the application of a conservative ANI threshold of 95% (as in GTDB [16]) rather than the established ANI species demarcation range [27] does not reveal this diversification (SI 2.2).
We estimated the timescales of this diversification within Piscirickettsia. Due to its rather recent discovery, base substitution rates could not be calculated from the fixed point mutations recorded (SI 1.9). Genomes of the related intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila accumulate base substitutions at a rate of 2.1 × 10−7 site–1 year–1 (with a 95% credibility interval of 1.7 × 10−7 to 2.4 × 10−7 site–1 year–1) [28]. Applying this rate as a proxy for Piscirickettsia, the last common ancestors of genogroups EM, LF, and NC date back to 547, 104, and 6554 years B.P., respectively. By comparison, the radiations of subgroups EM1, EM2, and EM3 commenced only 96 to 28 years ago (Fig. 1E, F).
Speciation could have been caused by geographic separation. However, strains from the LF and EM genogroups were isolated from the same region in the same year. Also the detection of the highly related NZ-RLO2 genome sequence in New Zealand revealed that even the EM genogroup is not confined to South America. Furthermore, expanding the analysis to all 238 publicly available P. salmonis 16S rRNA gene sequences showed the co-occurrence of different P. salmonis lineages even on a global scale (Supplementary Fig. S4). Tip-permutation tests (SI 1.10) showed an only slightly nonrandom distribution of the biogeographic origin of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (p = 10–4, retention index RI = 0.427), most likely caused by the overrepresentation of Chilean isolates rather than by true spatial separation.
Secondly, speciation could be an adaptation to different fish host species, but strains of the different Piscirickettsia genogroups have been isolated from the same salmonid species in the same year (e.g., Psal-003/Psal-114, Psal-011/Psal-013, Psal-072/Psal-073, AY6297B/AY6492A; Supplementary Table S1), or even the same host individual (see below). 16S rRNA sequence variants were randomly distributed across fish species (tip-permutation tests yielded p = 0.065, RI = 0.13), disproving the hypothesis [23] that different phylogenetic clades of P. salmonis are adapted to single fish species. For example, EM genotypes infect Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) as well as Pacific salmonids (O. kisutch, O. mykiss, O. tshawytscha) (Supplementary Fig. S4).
Despite the lack of geographic separation and host specialization, a phylogenetic network analysis of the core genome showed virtually no network structure between the three genogroups (Supplementary Fig. S5A), indicating that recombination between them is severely restricted, as shown for other sympatric bacterial species [29–31]. At higher resolution, even the four EM subgroups could still be recognized as separate clusters in the SplitsTree network, showing that recombination between them is also limited (Fig. 1G), which is in line with the high bootstrap support of EM subgroups in the phylogenomic tree (Fig. 1F). Indeed, homologous recombination events as detected by ClonalFrameML involved only a low number of small DNA fragments and affected only a minor fraction (<3.5%) of the Piscirickettsia genomes (SI 1.7, 2.3). Differences in restriction-modification (R-M) systems have been suggested as one mechanism of genetic isolation and speciation in bacteria [29]. Indeed, we could detect a type IC R-M system and the corresponding, highly methylated, nucleotide sequence motif in Canadian genomes (but not others), as well as a genogroup- and subgroup-specific insertional inactivation of comEC and comF competence genes in all three genogroups (SI 1.4, 2.3), which represent potential mechanisms of genetic isolation. Based on this cumulative evidence, the three Piscirickettsia genogroups represent evolutionarily separated species.
Genogroups remained genetically fully isolated even though they colonize the same host individual: genome sequencing of three supposedly pure original cultures uncovered that each harbored one LF and one EM genogroup strain (Psal-006a/Psal-006b, Psal-010a/Psal-010b, Psal-104a/Psal-104b; Supplementary Table S1). Both members grew in stable laboratory co-culture, without their genomes showing signatures of larger inter-genotype recombination events. Such co-cultures were obtained in three different years from two different salmonid species. Evidently, the three Piscirickettsia genogroups constitute distinct and genetically isolated, evolutionary units of which at least two are spatially coexisting. Within the EM genogroup, the speciation process between the four EM subgroups is nascent, while branch lengths, lower sequence identity, and the estimated times of diversification show that the separation of the Norwegian and Canadian strains within the NC genogroup is further advanced.
Extrachromosomal elements were acquired early, co-evolved with the chromosome, and rarely cause antibiotic resistance
The P. salmonis genomes contained a total of 290 extrachromosomal elements (ECEs; Supplementary Table S4A) belonging to 42 different phylogenetic types (Supplementary Fig. S7, SI 2.4). All ECE types were genogroup-specific or even EM subgroup-specific and 286 ECEs were not related to plasmid sequences in other genogroups or any other bacterium, indicating that horizontal transfer among P. salmonis genogroups or EM subgroups, or between other bacteria and P. salmonis is very rare (Fig. 1H, Supplementary Fig. S5C). Most ECEs had a GC content very similar to the chromosome (39.7-39.8%) and sequences of two ECE types were even detected in the more distant genomes of NZ-RLO1 and Y2. Therefore, ECEs likely were acquired by the ancestors of the genogroups or EM subgroups and subsequently persisted during diversification. Many of the ECEs contained virulence factors and hence may be involved in host adaptation (SI 2.4).
For most P. salmonis genomes the CARD Resistance Gene Identifier [32] did not return any perfect or strict hits to known antibiotic resistance genes (Supplementary Table S5). Only ECE type 5, present in three P. salmonis strains, carried five known antibiotic resistance markers for tetracycline (tet(31)), sulfonamides (sul2), chloramphenicol (cat2), streptothricin (sat1), and aminoglycosides (aad1). One strain contained a shorter derivative (ECE type 7) with three of these markers (Supplementary Table S4A). The high sequence similarity of ECE type 5 to plasmids of other fish pathogens [33], its successful conjugative transfer to E. coli [33], and the deviating, higher GC contents (53.1 and 55%) point to a recent acquisition of this resistance plasmid through horizontal gene transfer. The four Piscirickettsia strains containing the two antibiotic-resistance plasmids did not differ by any SNP in their recombination-corrected core genomes (AY3800B, AY3864B, AY6297B, AY6532B; Fig. 1E) and had been isolated over just three years in the same geographic region in Chile (Supplementary Table S1), suggesting a single acquisition event in this clonal and local subpopulation without spread to other populations. The low prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in P. salmonis is corroborated by a previous study of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) across 292 field isolates from multiple piscirickettsiosis outbreaks which showed a unimodal frequency distribution for oxytetracycline, indicating that resistance against this antibiotic was largely absent [24]. Our laboratory tests of a subset of 20 LF and EM strains confirmed that all strains were susceptible to oxytetracycline, florfenicol, and chloramphenicol (based on established MIC breakpoints; Supplementary Table S6). Collectively, these data contradict the proposal of an effective spread of oxytetracycline resistance among natural fish populations and aquacultures [33] that was invoked to explain the frequent failure of this antibiotic during Piscirickettsia outbreaks [7, 10, 33]. Our results were unexpected given the extensive use of oxytetracycline in Chilean salmon farming and the frequent occurrence of tet genes in many other gammaproteobacterial genera from fish farms [34]. Likely, the pronounced genetic isolation renders the acquisition rate of resistance plasmids too low to counterbalance plasmid losses, and so far prevented tet genes to sweep across Piscirickettsia.
In contrast to oxytetracycline, resistance to the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin was frequently detected (Supplementary Table S6) although it arises only rarely in aquatic environments [35, 36]. The transversion point mutation G259T in the Quinolone Resistance-Determining Region of the gyrA gene that causes a D87Y amino acid substitution in the DNA gyrase A subunit and underlies quinolone resistance [37] was observed in 67% of the LF genomes. Strains carrying this mutation also displayed higher MIC values than most other strains (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S8) and formed a single clade in the recombination-corrected core genome phylogeny which we estimated to have emerged around the year 1998 (Fig. 1E, asterisks). By contrast, the gyrA point mutation was absent in all our EM strains which also tested sensitive to ciprofloxacin with the exception of strain Psal-069 that seems to feature an unknown mechanism of ciprofloxacin resistance (Supplementary Fig. S8B).
The quinolones oxolinic acid and flumequine had been widely used as first line drugs against piscirickettsiosis in Chilean aquaculture since 1989 [37, 38]. From 2010 on, their use declined and in 2016 amounted to less than 1% of all antibiotics used in aquaculture [39]. Our data are consistent with a scenario in which application of quinolones in salmon farming caused a strong selection of a single LF genotype with a gyrA G259T point mutation that subsequently swept through two thirds of the Chilean LF population during a decade of continued usage of these drugs (1998-2010) and even prevailed in the years thereafter. Similar rapid sweeps of gyrA point mutations have been documented in human pathogens [40]. Piscirickettsia strains also had intrinsic resistances to erythromycin, gentamicin, polymyxin, and beta-lactams (SI 2.4). Contrary to many other pathogenic Gammaproteobacteria, antibiotic resistance of P. salmonis populations is thus strongly governed by vertical inheritance of chromosome-encoded resistance mechanisms rather than horizontal transfer of resistance genes.
An unprecedented diversity and expansion of transposases are hallmarks of Piscirickettsia evolution
Between 331 and 848 transposase genes were detected in Piscirickettsia chromosomes, representing 10.5 – 21.1% of all coding sequences, significantly surpassing the percentages in most other bacterial genomes (<3% [ref. [41]]) including those of related Gammaproteobacteria (Francisella, Coxiella, Legionella) (Fig. 3A). The three Canadian isolates had the highest number of transposase genes ever reported for prokaryotes.
The frequency of transposases in prokaryotic genomes increases through horizontal acquisition and by intragenomic replicative (copy-paste) transposition of insertion sequence (IS) elements. Piscirickettsia harbors an unprecedented diversity of 106 phylogenetically distinct transposase types (SI 1.8, 2.5). 16 types from four families (IS1595, IS30, IS6, IS630; marked in Supplementary Table S8) were closely related (80–100% Amino Acid Identity, AAI) to known transposases from otherwise very distant (genome similarity, 36-37% AAI) bacteria of the phyla Bacteroidota, Actinomycetota, and Bacillota which are dominant constituents of the S. salar microbiome [42] and thus likely were exchanged through recent horizontal gene transfer. Over two thirds of the transposase types were present in multiple copies and several transposase types reached copy numbers surpassing those in any other bacterial species [43] (e.g., 248 copies in the Canadian strains; SI 2.5; Supplementary Table S8). This pronounced expansion of transposases is another hallmark of Piscirickettsia genomes. Our genome sequencing also provided independent evidence for ongoing transposition events: four of the genomes comprised duplicated regions that occurred extrachromosomally (SI 2.5). The active transposases identified in our work are the most likely cause for the previously observed translocation of a chromosome fragment to a plasmid, transcriptional changes, and the attenuation of cytopathic effects during an extended two-year laboratory cultivation of a Piscirickettsia EM strain [44].
A subsequent analysis of transposase mobility and of signatures of selection pressure on transposases (SI 1.8, 1.9) revealed that transposase activity differs between the Piscirickettsia genogroups. To assess transposase mobility, their flanking regions were compared (SI 1.8). This indicated that only 15% of the transposases were stationary in the EM genogroup (insert, Fig. 3A) and high copy number transposases had retained their high mobility even after transposition bursts (Fig. 4A). In particular, all EM subgroup-specific transposases were highly mobile (Fig. 4B, upper light blue bar). In the LF genogroup and Canadian strains, however, about half of the transposases became stationary during radiation (insert, Fig. 3A) and high mobility was observed only for low copy number transposases whereas highly expanded transposases had limited mobility (Fig. 4A, C, D). This corresponds to the higher fraction of truncated transposases found in LF and NC genomes (Supplementary Table S9A). Transposition can also be attenuated by the formation of stable hairpin structures by transcripts repressing their translation. Five of the low copy number transposases contained such hairpins (see SI 2.5). Genogroups not only differed in their specific transposase inventories (dots in Fig. 4E), but also in the extent and direction of selection pressure of the 24 transposase types that occurred across genogroups (squares in Fig. 4E, F). Particularly transposases with strong expansion harbored sites that were under purifying and/or diversifying selection pressure (indicated by triangles or diamonds in Fig. 4A).
During genome evolution, copies of the same IS element can serve as recombination sites for large-scale genome rearrangements. Transposition also mediates the acquisition of novel genes, pseudogenization, or changes in the regulation of preexisting genes. Within the Piscirickettsia LF and EM genogroups, gene synteny was largely maintained and gene order conservation (GOC) values were similar to closely related bacterial species with a much lower transposase content (Supplementary Fig. S11A, B). Piscirickettsia chromosomes also lacked the highly broken GC skew patterns that are typical for species with highly active transposases like Orientia tsutsugamushi and Microcystis aeruginosa [45, 46] (Fig. 3B, Supplementary Fig. S12). However, genome synteny was unusually decreased within the NC genogroup and also between the three Piscirickettsia genogroups considering their genomic relatedness (Supplementary Fig. S11B, C). Evidently, major genome rearrangements occurred during the differentiation into three Piscirickettsia genogroups as well as during the split between Norwegian and Canadian genomes in the NC genogroup, but must have considerably slowed down during subsequent radiation of the LF and EM genogroups.
Up to 20% of the CDSs in Piscirickettsia genomes represented pseudogenes. While most prokaryotic genomes contain only few pseudogenes (1–5% of all CDSs [47]), high percentages of pseudogenes of up to 50% or more have been observed in genomes of facultative intracellular pathogens or recent symbionts [48–51] and were caused by an extreme multiplication of IS elements. Genomes of the EM genogroup had the lowest and Canadian genomes the highest numbers and percentages of pseudogenes. The dominant mechanism of pseudogenization was truncation. Transposases were found to flank pseudogenes and shorter pseudogene fragments in intergenic regions more frequently than would be expected if they were distributed randomly across the genome (Supplementary Table S9A, B; SI 2.5).
Therefore, the role of transposases in the evolution of Piscirickettsia was assessed by a phylogenetic regression analysis of the effects of transposases on overall gene and pseudogene content using BayesTraits (SI 1.9). For the EM genogroup, the numbers of functional transposases had the highest explanatory power for the variance in numbers of non-transposase genes (R2 = 0.64), suggesting that transposases were most relevant for the acquisition of novel genes. By contrast, the numbers of functional transposases in the LF genogroup had the highest explanatory power for the variance in numbers of non-transposase pseudogenes (R2 = 0.50), and hence mostly affected pseudogenization. IS elements therefore represent major drivers of genome evolution in Piscirickettsia and contributed towards the differentiation of the genogroups.
Genogroup-specific evolution of gene content and functional implications
The distribution of homolog groups across all Piscirickettsia genomes revealed considerable geno- and subgroup-specific gene inventories (SI 1.9, 2.6). Therefore, changes in gene content, pseudogenization, extrachromosomal elements, and genogroup-specific positive gene selection during Piscirickettsia evolution were quantified and the resulting group-specific gene functions were determined (Fig. 5). An initial quantification of gene gains and losses by BadiRate showed unusually large changes in the COG L gene families (encompassing transposases). Therefore, gene gains and losses were quantified separately for transposase and non-transposase genes.
Gene gains exceeded losses during the evolution of genogroups and EM subgroups all the way up to their most recent terminal radiations (Fig. 5). At the same time, the high proportion of pseudogenes indicates ongoing gene losses, so the overall dynamics of Piscirickettsia genomes is truly remarkable. The net gain of genes is in line with Piscirickettsia genome sizes (3.25–4.15 Mb) that clearly exceed that of the last common ancestor shared with the Legionellales (2 Mb [17]). Whereas in the LF genogroup most genes were gained before the divergence of its members, major gene gains in the EM genogroup were assigned to the six short branches leading to the four EM subgroups and hence were associated with subgroup diversification (Fig. 5). The largest gains of specific genes were detected for the genomes of the Norwegian and Canadian isolates. Plasmids were gained mostly during early evolution of Piscirickettsia whereas plasmid gains and losses became balanced during the recent divergence of the Canadian strains, the LF genogroup, and strains of the EM subgroups. The resulting specific gene inventories ranged from 115 genes in the EM genogroup up to 367 genes in the Canadian genomes (Fig. 5; SI 1.9). Between 8 and 13% of these genes were still detectable as pseudogenes in the genomes of at least one other genogroup. In addition, up to 12 core genes were found to contain genogroup-specific polymorphisms when employing the aBSREL tool [52], indicating a positive selection (Fig. 5).
Some Piscirickettsia strains have been shown to differ in their levels of virulence and resistance to the salmon complement system [20, 23]. In the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum, O-antigen polysaccharides have been shown to mask surface-located molecular patterns, preventing phagocytosis by skin epithelial cells of fish, and also provide resistance to antimicrobial factors [53]. In Piscirickettsia, the UDP-glucose-4-epimerase gene for O-antigen galactofuranose synthesis was positively selected in the EM genogroup (homolog family group 92; Supplementary Table S10). Only Canadian strains contained two genes involved in L-fucose synthesis (groups 2960, 2961), or in 3,6-dideoxyhexose synthesis (CDP-4-dehydro-6-deoxyglucose reductase; group 2962). In O-antigen polysaccharides, fucose can be bound by C-type mannose-specific host lectins [53]. The 3,6-dideoxyhexoses ascarylose, abequose, and tyvelose are other major antigen determinants which so far were only known from a limited number of enterobacteria (Salmonella and Yersinia) [54]. Vice versa, Canadian strains lacked the biosynthetic pathway for pseudaminic acid which has experimentally been shown to occur in Piscirickettsia lipopolysaccharides [55]. Many of the other genogroup-specific or specifically selected genes that were functionally annotated are also associated with host-pathogen surface interactions (O-antigen synthesis, OM proteins, peptidases, defense systems, transporters; Fig. 5, SI 2.6). Our findings imply distinct surface antigenic structures of individual Piscirickettsia geno- and subgroups.
Another virulence factor with group-specific distribution in Piscirickettsia is the Icm/Dot Type IVB secretion system [11, 56]. This secretion system constitutes the main virulence factor in the Legionellales, including the intracellular parasites of ruminants, arthropods, ticks, and amoebae (Aquicella, Rickettsiella/Diplorickettsia, Candidatus Berkiella´). In Piscirickettsia, its expression is increased after the uptake by macrophages and upon acidification [3, 11, 57] while mutants are attenuated in the fish host [22]. Aside from the secretion system itself, we also detected 10 different genes encoding icm/dot effectors (Supplementary Table S11A).
The unique feature of all closed P. salmonis genomes is the duplication or triplication of the icm/dot gene cluster (Supplementary Fig. S16). Higher numbers of icm/dot gene clusters in the LF strains and the Norwegian isolate in combination with a higher degree of mutational inactivation by frameshifts in the LF genogroup (SI 2.6) may at least partly explain the differences in virulence observed for different Piscirickettsia isolates [20, 21, 23]. The icm/dot gene clusters of P. salmonis had strong structural similarities to that of L. pneumophila and Coxiella burnetii and likely originated from a common ancestor (Supplementary Fig. S16A, B). Our phylogenetic reconstruction revealed two early duplication events prior to the divergence of the Piscirickettsia genogroups, yielding three gene clusters, here denoted A, B, and C (Supplementary Fig. S16B). Piscirickettsia strains Y2 and NZ-RLO1, which are less closely related to the other strains as the latter are to each other, contained the three icm/dot gene clusters. Lineage Y2 may have diverged from the other genomes about 200 million years ago [17], which is later than the occurrence of the last common ancestor of all bony fishes (Osteichthyes; 420 million years ago [58]). The acquisition of multiple icm/dot gene clusters therefore could have occurred during the colonization of bony fishes by Piscirickettsia. The presence of cluster C in strain NZ-RLO2 together with its absence in the very closely related 36 EM genomes and the three Canadian genomes (Supplementary Fig. S2) indicates two recent, independent losses of the ancient icm/dot cluster C just prior to the radiation of the EM genogroup and of the Canadian subgroup, respectively. Our observation of icm/dot gene clusters in two extrachromosomal circular translocatable units of the EM strain Psal-072 and LF strain Psal-073 (see above, Supplementary Fig. S10) indicate two ongoing, independent translocation events. Likewise, a mobilization of the icm/dot gene cluster on composite transposons may have caused the early duplication of these clusters in Piscirickettsia.
Unexpected diversity, habitat range, and worldwide distribution of Piscirickettsia
We finally assessed the geographic distribution of Piscirickettsia beyond the available isolates, and determined to which extent cultivated strains are representative for the diversity within the genus.
The set of 238 different 16S rRNA sequences of P. salmonis and related bacteria showed a broad geographic distribution (Fig. 6A, circles) and were detected mostly in farmed fish belonging to four salmonid species, but also in 14 different non-salmonid species as well as one marine sponge (Supplementary Fig. S4, Supplementary Table S12). Nearly full-length sequences (>1300 bp; n = 211) were used to determine the phylogenetic divergence. Aside from two phylotypes that originated from Hawaiian lake water (LA1-B44N and LA7-B48N; Supplementary Fig. S4), all sequence types had pairwise similarity values >94% and hence can be considered members of the genus Piscirickettsia based on the accepted similarity threshold for bacterial genera [59]. Within the genus, a considerable variety of lineages and five distinct phylogenetic clades with stable bootstrap support can be recognized (Fig. 6B). Considering that the LF and NC genogroups cannot even be distinguished with regard to their 16S rRNA gene sequences and taking into account the open Piscirickettsia pan genome, the number of species must at least be twice the number deduced from our genome comparison of the 73 available closed genomes.
P. salmonis was so far only reported sporadically and mostly for marine waters adjacent to salmon farms [60]. However, BLAST searches using all protein-coding genes of four representative genomes of Piscirickettsia LF, N, C, and EM groups against the EBI metagenome database MGnify returned hits for 76 different groups of homologs of Piscirickettsia hypothetical proteins. Also hits for nine transposase types were found, reported from 10 different locations in five distant oceanic provinces (triangles in Fig. 6A, Supplementary Table S12; all hits were in the TARA Ocean dataset). P. salmonis thus is much more wide-spread in the marine environment than previously thought. A global dispersal of different P. salmonis genogroups is in line with (i) over 150 years of successful worldwide introduction of salmonids and of extensive shipments of salmonid eggs [61], (ii) the continuous release of P. salmonis from infected fish via bile, feces, and urine into seawater [62] combined with the long-term survival of free-living cells for up to 40 days in situ [63], (iii) the rapid spread of piscirickettsiosis through surrounding waters between fish from different stocks, hatcheries, and freshwater rearing facilities [64], and (iv) the horizontal transfer of P. salmonis between fish individuals that was shown experimentally [2, 20].
An entirely unexpected finding was the detection of numerous contigs which were identical to chromosomal regions of Piscirickettsia in two draft genomes of Bacillus halotolerans, indicating a contamination of the sequenced Bacillus culture by Piscirickettsia cells that must have been present in the inoculum that originated from the rhizosphere of Limoniastrum monopetalum (Grand Statice), a native plant of Mediterranean saltmarshes and sandy beaches often in direct contact with seawater during high tides (Fig. 6A, red square). The contigs perfectly matched the genome of P. salmonis Psal-002 of the EM genogroup, comprised a large variety of different functional genes, and covered a considerable portion (35,945 and 307,389 base pairs, respectively) of the two deposited, contaminated Bacillus genomes. While this initial finding needs to be substantiated by systematic screenings in the future, it supports the notion of a very broad environmental distribution of Piscirickettsia and indicates that this fish pathogen also persists in a viable state in previously unrecognized habitats.
Implications for the future management of Piscirickettsia
Salmonid farming currently accounts for 90% of all industry-related antibiotic use in Chile [6], applying florfenicol and oxytetracycline for the prophylaxis of piscirickettsiosis [37, 39]. Despite the high dosage, antibiotics treatments often failed over the past 30 years [7, 10, 13, 33], which has been attributed to resistance formation [33, 64], but based on our results must be caused by other factors. As shown in our study, antibiotic resistance in Piscirickettsia is mostly intrinsic, clearly absent for florfenicol and oxytetracycline, and typically does not involve the horizontal acquisition of antibiotic resistance seen in other Gammaproteobacteria, that also causes concerns for human health. Instead, a continuous reinfection of farmed salmon by Piscirickettsia originating from the previously unrecognized reservoirs in coastal environments, potentially even the nutrient-rich rhizosphere [65] of marine coastal plants, may account for the repeated failure of antibiotic treatments. Once acquired, however, antibiotic resistance could sweep efficiently through Piscirickettsia populations as shown by our data on quinolone resistance in the LF genogroup. In light of the unpredictable outcome of antibiotic treatments, the worldwide increase in salmon production, and the widespread distribution of Piscirickettsia, alternative strategies were recently called for [13] and are clearly needed for the future management of piscirickettsiosis. Such strategies could encompass dedicated preventive measures including surveillance, predictions of outbreaks, and improved aquaculture design.
The pronounced genomic diversification in the genus Piscirickettsia determined in the present study was previously unknown due to the very limited number of closed genome sequences and the strong underrepresentation of EM strains. The additional groups of Piscirickettsia that were uncovered by our analysis of available 16S rRNA and metagenome sequences still await future isolation and characterization. The genomic information gathered in the current work provides the means to develop methods for the specific monitoring of these different groups. The genogroup and subgroup-specific stationary transposases offer particularly promising targets for high throughput PCR-based fingerprinting to circumvent the tedious isolation and typing of individual strains [66] and, together with other genogroup-specific genes, would allow the quantification of bacterial loads by qPCR. Furthermore, our analysis of the genogroup-specific gene contents revealed consistent differences in surface antigen synthesis pathways and other virulence-associated traits. This type of information can potentially serve to predict the severity of future piscirickettsiosis outbreaks in salmon aquaculture.
We detected Piscirickettsia genomic fragments in datasets from diverse coastal and open ocean environments. To date, the major environmental reservoirs of this important fish pathogen could not be identified. In this respect, sensitive detection methods targeting group-specific genes would also enable a systematic screening of environmental samples and could help to design and operate salmon aquacultures in suitable locations and thus improve their sustainability.
Piscirickettsia is in an intermediate stage of host adaptation and lacks the hallmarks of an obligate relationship such as a reduced genome size and absence of IS elements [67, 68]. Bacteria with high transposase content typically are intracellular pathogens or symbionts; a content >10% has only been reported for Shigella dysenteriae, the amoebae symbiont Candidatus Amoebophilus asiaticus´ (Bacteroidota), the human pathogenic alphaproteobacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi, and the mollusc pathogen Francisella halioticida [45, 69, 70]. The unusually high transposase content of Piscirickettsia indicates an earlier stage of host adaptation and likely is caused not only by genetic isolation, but also by small population sizes and population bottlenecks that render the loss of genes without selective advantage less efficient [71, 72]. Speciation is still ongoing within the NC genogroup and the EM genogroup has commenced to split into four different subgroups just over the past centuries. Transposition has been one of the drivers of early evolution of Piscirickettsia and could be shown to be ongoing particularly in the EM genogroup. Like the EM2 and EM3 subgroups that have emerged over the past decades and evolve rapidly, novel Piscirickettsia pathogens may be expected in the near future. This is of specific relevance to piscirickettsiosis outbreaks in Chilean aquaculture because of the higher virulence of EM genogroup strains which cause acute and severe systemic and hemorrhagic disease and a higher cumulative mortality [20, 21].
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Simone Severitt and Carola Berg for excellent technical assistance regarding PacBio sequencing. The Chilean team acknowledges the full commitment of Ms. Sandra Zelada and Dr. Cristian Valenzuela and their help in managing the grant. We are indebted to Professor Oystein Evensen, Norwegian University of Lives Sciences, Oslo, Norway and to Dr. Simon Jones, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada, for providing some Piscirickettsia isolates.
Author contributions
JO together with SHM and BB designed the study. IS conducted the majority of bioinformatic analyses. GC performed the quality control of strains and isolated and provided genomic DNA. CS and BB performed the genome sequencing. HMF, NO, TR, JPM-K, MG, PAF-H, GN-G, UN, and JS contributed specific bioinformatic analyses. AL provided P. salmonis strains and metadata, FG and CC provided partial sequences of old P. salmonis isolates. JF isolated and provided novel strains and helped in the delineation of Piscirickettsia genogroups. SHM recovered P. salmonis strains from Norway and Canada, JOP and FVP determined antibiotic resistance. IS and JO wrote the manuscript which was revised and approved by all coauthors.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The genomes sequenced during the current study are available on NCBI GenBank. Nucleotide accession numbers of all newly sequenced genomes and Piscirickettsia genomes downloaded from GenBank for these analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Nucleotide accession numbers of reference genomes of other species used for transposase and gene order conservation analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S13. 16S rRNA gene nucleotide accession numbers of Piscirickettsia salmonis, Piscirickettsia sp., or Rickettsia-like organisms used for the phylogeny of the genus Piscirickettsia are listed in Supplementary Table S14.
Competing interests
This work was funded by grant 201708070182 from the PGSA Program (Programa para la Gestión Sanitaria en Acuicultura) of Sernapesca and Intesal-Chile to PUCV (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso).
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41396-023-01531-9.
References
- 1.Fryer JL, Lannan CN, Garces LH, Larenas JJ, Smith PA. Isolation of a Rickettsiales-like organism from diseased coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Chile. Fish Pathol. 1990;25:107–14. doi: 10.3147/jsfp.25.107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fryer JL, Hedrick RP. Piscirickettsia salmonis: a Gram-negative intracellular bacterial pathogen of fish. J Fish Dis. 2003;26:251–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00460.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marshall SH, Gómez FA, Klose KE The genus Piscirickettsia. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (eds). The Prokaryotes, 4. ed. 2014. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 565-73.
- 4.Olsen A, Melby H, Speilberg L, Evensen Ø, Håstein T. Piscirickettsia salmonis infection in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in Norway - epidemiological, pathological and microbiological findings. Dis Aquat Organ. 1997;31:35–48. doi: 10.3354/dao031035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reid HI, Griffen AA, Birkbeck TH. Isolates of Piscirickettsia salmonis from Scotland and Ireland show evidence of clonal diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:4393–7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4393-4397.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Otterlei A, Brevik ØJ, Jensen D, Duesund H, Sommerset I, Frost P, et al. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of Piscirickettsia salmonis from Chilean and Canadian salmonids. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12:55. doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0681-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brocklebank JR, Evelyn TPT, Speare DJ, Armstrong R. Rickettsial septicemia in farmed Atlantic and chinook salmon in British Columbia: clinical presentation and experimental transmission. Can Vet J. 1993;34:745–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jones S, Markham R, Groman D, Cusack R. Virulence and antigenic characteristics of a cultured Rickettsiales-like organism isolated from farmed Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in eastern Canada. Dis Aquat Organ. 1998;33:25–31. doi: 10.3354/dao033025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.SERNAPESCA. Informe sanitario salmonicultura en centros marinos – año 2020. http://www.sernapesca.cl/sites/default/files/informe_sanitario_salmonicultura_en_centros_marinos_2020v2.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2022.
- 10.Rozas M, Enríquez R. Piscirickettsiosis and Piscirickettsia salmonis in fish: a review. J Fish Dis. 2014;37:163–88. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gómez FA, Tobar JA, Henríquez V, Sola M, Altamirano C, Marshall SH. Evidence of the presence of a functional Dot/Icm Type IV-B secretion system in the fish bacterial pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fryer JL, Lannan CN, Giovannoni SJ, Wood ND. Piscirickettsia salmonis gen. nov., sp. nov., the causative agent of an epizootic disease in salmonid fishes. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:120–6. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-1-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Figueroa J, Cárcamo J, Yañez A, Olavarria V, Ruiz P, Manríquez R, et al. Addressing viral and bacterial threats to salmon farming in Chile: historical contexts and perspectives for management and control. Rev Aquac. 2019;11:299–324. doi: 10.1111/raq.12333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharma V, Vashishtha A, Jos ALM, Khosla A, Basu N, Yadav R, et al. Phylogenomics of the phylum Proteobacteria: resolving the complex relationships. Curr Microbiol. 2022;79:224. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-02910-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, et al. The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D643–D648. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hugoson E, Guliaev A, Ammunét T, Guy L. Host adaptation in Legionellales Is 1.9 Ga, coincident with eukaryogenesis. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:msac037. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fryer JL, Lannan CN Piscirickettsia. In: Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P, Rainey P, et al. (eds). Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 2015. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd}, pp 1–8.
- 19.Nourdin-Galindo G, Sánchez P, Molina CF, Espinoza-Rojas DA, Oliver C, Ruiz P, et al. Comparative pan-genome analysis of Piscirickettsia salmonis reveals genomic divergences within genogroups. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:459. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rozas-Serri M, Ildefonso R, Peña A, Enríquez R, Barrientos S, Maldonado L. Comparative pathogenesis of piscirickettsiosis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) post-smolt experimentally challenged with LF-89-like and EM-90-like Piscirickettsia salmonis isolates. J Fish Dis. 2017;40:1451–72. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.House M, Bartholomew J, Winton J, Fryer J. Relative virulence of three isolates of Piscirickettsia salmonis for coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch. Dis Aquat Organ. 1999;35:107–13. doi: 10.3354/dao035107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mancilla M, Saavedra J, Grandón M, Tapia E, Navas E, Grothusen H, et al. The mutagenesis of a type IV secretion system locus of Piscirickettsia salmonis leads to the attenuation of the pathogen in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. J Fish Dis. 2018;41:625–34. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saavedra J, Hernandez N, Osses A, Castillo A, Cancino A, Grothusen H, et al. Prevalence, geographic distribution and phenotypic differences of Piscirickettsia salmonis EM-90-like isolates. J Fish Dis. 2017;40:1055–63. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Henríquez P, Kaiser M, Bohle H, Bustos P, Mancilla M. Comprehensive antibiotic susceptibility profiling of Chilean Piscirickettsia salmonis field isolates. J Fish Dis. 2016;39:441–8. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mauel MJ, Giovannoni SJ, Fryer JL. Phylogenetic analysis of Piscirickettsia salmonis by 16S, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and 23S ribosomal DNA sequencing. Dis Aquat Organ. 1999;35:115–23. doi: 10.3354/dao035115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bravo C, Martinez V. Whole-genome comparative analysis of the pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. Vet Microbiol. 2016;196:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.David S, Rusniok C, Mentasti M, Gomez-Valero L, Harris SR, Lechat P, et al. Multiple major disease-associated clones of Legionella pneumophila have emerged recently and independently. Genome Res. 2016;26:1555–64. doi: 10.1101/gr.209536.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fraser C, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science (1979) 2007;315:476–80. doi: 10.1126/science.1127573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wielgoss S, Didelot X, Chaudhuri RR, Liu X, Weedall GD, Velicer GJ, et al. A barrier to homologous recombination between sympatric strains of the cooperative soil bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. ISME J. 2016;10:2468–77. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shapiro BJ, Polz MF. Ordering microbial diversity into ecologically and genetically cohesive units. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22:235–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saavedra J, Grandón M, Villalobos-González J, Bohle H, Bustos P, Mancilla M. Isolation, functional characterization and transmissibility of p3PS10, a multidrug resistance plasmid of the fish pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:923. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Furushita M, Shiba T, Maeda T, Yahata M, Kaneoka A, Takahashi Y, et al. Similarity of tetracycline resistance genes isolated from fish farm bacteria to those from clinical isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5336–42. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5336-5342.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Amos GCA, Ploumakis S, Zhang L, Hawkey PM, Gaze WH, Wellington EMH. The widespread dissemination of integrons throughout bacterial communities in a riverine system. ISME J. 2018;12:681–91. doi: 10.1038/s41396-017-0030-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cheng X, Lu Y, Song Y, Zhang R, ShangGuan X, Xu H, et al. Analysis of antibiotic resistance genes, environmental factors, and microbial community from aquaculture farms in five provinces, China. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:679805. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.679805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Henríquez P, Bohle H, Bustamante F, Bustos P, Mancilla M. Polymorphism in gyrA is associated to quinolones resistance in Chilean Piscirickettsia salmonis field isolates. J Fish Dis. 2015;38:415–8. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lozano I, Díaz NF, Muñoz S, Riquelme C Antibiotics in Chilean Aquaculture: A Review. In: Savic S (ed). Antibiotic Use in Animals. 2018. InTech.
- 39.Miranda CD, Godoy FA, Lee MR. Current status of the use of antibiotics and the antimicrobial resistance in the Chilean salmon farms. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1284. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Holden MTG, Hsu LY, Kurt K, Weinert LA, Mather AE, Harris SR, et al. A genomic portrait of the emergence, evolution, and global spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pandemic. Genome Res. 2013;23:653–64. doi: 10.1101/gr.147710.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Siguier P, Filée J, Chandler M. Insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9:526–31. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Heys C, Cheaib B, Busetti A, Kazlauskaite R, Maier L, Sloan WT, et al. Neutral processes dominate microbial community assembly in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e02283–19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02283-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wagner A. Periodic extinctions of transposable elements in bacterial lineages: evidence from intragenomic variation in multiple genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:723–33. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Valenzuela-Miranda D, Valenzuela-Muñoz V, Nuñez-Acuña G, Gallardo-Escárate C. Long-term serial culture of Piscirickettsia salmonis leads to a genomic and transcriptomic reorganization affecting bacterial virulence. Aquaculture. 2020;529:735634. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nakayama K, Yamashita A, Kurokawa K, Morimoto T, Ogawa M, Fukuhara M, et al. The whole-genome sequencing of the obligate intracellular bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi revealed massive gene amplification during reductive genome evolution. DNA Res. 2008;15:185–99. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Westberg J, Persson A, Holmberg A, Goesmann A, Lundeberg J, Johansson K-E, et al. The genome sequence of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides SC type strain PG1T, the causative agent of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP) Genome Res. 2004;14:221–7. doi: 10.1101/gr.1673304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu Y, Harrison PM, Kunin V, Gerstein M. Comprehensive analysis of pseudogenes in prokaryotes: widespread gene decay and failure of putative horizontally transferred genes. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R64. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-r64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ran L, Larsson J, Vigil-Stenman T, Nylander JAA, Ininbergs K, Zheng W-W, et al. Genome erosion in a nitrogen-fixing vertically transmitted endosymbiotic multicellular cyanobacterium. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Toh H, Weiss BL, Perkin SAH, Yamashita A, Oshima K, Hattori M, et al. Massive genome erosion and functional adaptations provide insights into the symbiotic lifestyle of Sodalis glossinidius in the tsetse host. Genome Res. 2006;16:149–56. doi: 10.1101/gr.4106106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Belda E, Moya A, Bentley S, Silva FJ. Mobile genetic element proliferation and gene inactivation impact over the genome structure and metabolic capabilities of Sodalis glossinidius, the secondary endosymbiont of tsetse flies. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:449. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pinto-Carbó M, Sieber S, Dessein S, Wicker T, Verstraete B, Gademann K, et al. Evidence of horizontal gene transfer between obligate leaf nodule symbionts. ISME J. 2016;10:2092–105. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Smith MD, Wertheim JO, Weaver S, Murrell B, Scheffler K, Kosakovsky Pond SL. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:1342–53. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lindell K, Fahlgren A, Hjerde E, Willassen NP, Fällman M, Milton DL. Lipopolysaccharide O-antigen prevents phagocytosis of Vibrio anguillarum by rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) skin epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Thorson JS, Lo SF, Ploux O, He X, Liu HW. Studies of the biosynthesis of 3,6-dideoxyhexoses: molecular cloning and characterization of the asc (ascarylose) region from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serogroup VA. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:5483–93. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.17.5483-5493.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vinogradov E, Frimmelova M, Toman R. Chemical structure of the carbohydrate backbone of the lipopolysaccharide from Piscirickettsia salmonis. Carbohydr Res. 2013;378:108–13. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cortés Sobarzo MA. Study of the Type 4B Protein Secretion System (Dot/Icm) and the Effector Protein SdhA in Piscirickettsia salmonis. 2015. PhD, Universität Regensburg.
- 57.Zúñiga A, Aravena P, Pulgar R, Travisany D, Ortiz-Severín J, Chávez FP, et al. Transcriptomic changes of Piscirickettsia salmonis during intracellular growth in a salmon macrophage-like cell line. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;9:426. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Santini F, Harmon LJ, Carnevale G, Alfaro ME. Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:194. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W, Schleifer K-H, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:635–45. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mauel MJ, Fryer JL. Amplification of a Piscirickettsia salmonis-like 16S rDNA product from bacterioplankton DNA collected from the coastal waters of Oregon, USA. J Aquat Anim Health. 2001;13:280–4. doi: 10.1577/1548-8667(2001)013<0280:AOAPSL>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Arismendi I, Penaluna BE, Dunham JB, García de Leaniz C, Soto D, Fleming IA, et al. Differential invasion success of salmonids in southern Chile: patterns and hypotheses. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2014;24:919–41. doi: 10.1007/s11160-014-9351-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Contreras-Lynch S, Olmos P, Vargas A, Figueroa J, González-Stegmaier R, Enríquez R, et al. Identification and genetic characterization of Piscirickettsia salmonis in native fish from southern Chile. Dis Aquat Organ. 2015;115:233–44. doi: 10.3354/dao02892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Olivares J, Marshall SH. Determination of minimal concentration of Piscirickettsia salmonis in water columns to establish a fallowing period in salmon farms. J Fish Dis. 2010;33:261–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2009.01119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cartes C, Isla A, Lagos F, Castro D, Muñoz M, Yañez A, et al. Search and analysis of genes involved in antibiotic resistance in Chilean strains of Piscirickettsia salmonis. J Fish Dis. 2017;40:1025–39. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vieira S, Sikorski J, Dietz S, Herz K, Schrumpf M, Bruelheide H, et al. Drivers of the composition of active rhizosphere bacterial communities in temperate grasslands. ISME J. 2020;14:463–75. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0543-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Isla A, Saldarriaga‐Córdoba M, Fuentes DE, Albornoz R, Haussmann D, Mancilla‐Schulz J, et al. Multilocus sequence typing detects new Piscirickettsia salmonis hybrid genogroup in Chilean fish farms: evidence for genetic diversity and population structure. J Fish Dis. 2019;42:721–37. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tamas I, Klasson L, Canbäck B, Näslund AK, Eriksson AS, Wernegreen JJ, et al. 50 million years of genomic stasis in endosymbiotic bacteria. Science (1979) 2002;296:2376–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1071278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lerat E, Ochman H. Ψ-Φ: exploring the outer limits of bacterial pseudogenes. Genome Res. 2004;14:2273–8. doi: 10.1101/gr.2925604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Vongsawan AA, Kapatral V, Vaisvil B, Burd H, Serichantalergs O, Venkatesan MM, et al. The genome of Shigella dysenteriae strain Sd1617 comparison to representative strains in evaluating pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:fnv011. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schmitz-Esser S, Penz T, Spang A, Horn M. A bacterial genome in transition—an exceptional enrichment of IS elements but lack of evidence for recent transposition in the symbiont Amoebophilus asiaticus. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:270. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Moran NA, Plague GR. Genomic changes following host restriction in bacteria. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004;14:627–33. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wernegreen JJ. For better or worse: genomic consequences of intracellular mutualism and parasitism. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15:572–83. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Henríquez M, González E, Marshall SH, Henríquez V, Gómez FA, Martínez I, et al. A novel liquid medium for the efficient growth of the salmonid pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis and optimization of culture conditions. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sandoval R, Oliver C, Valdivia S, Valenzuela K, Haro RE, Sánchez P, et al. Resistance-nodulation-division efflux pump acrAB is modulated by florfenicol and contributes to drug resistance in the fish pathogen Piscirickettsia salmonis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363:fnw102. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The genomes sequenced during the current study are available on NCBI GenBank. Nucleotide accession numbers of all newly sequenced genomes and Piscirickettsia genomes downloaded from GenBank for these analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Nucleotide accession numbers of reference genomes of other species used for transposase and gene order conservation analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S13. 16S rRNA gene nucleotide accession numbers of Piscirickettsia salmonis, Piscirickettsia sp., or Rickettsia-like organisms used for the phylogeny of the genus Piscirickettsia are listed in Supplementary Table S14.