Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Nov 23:2023.11.22.23298907. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.11.22.23298907

Baseline malaria infection status and RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine efficacy

Michal Juraska, Angela M Early, Li Li, Stephen F Schaffner, Marc Lievens, Akanksha Khorgade, Brian Simpkins, Nima S Hejazi, David A Benkeser, Qi Wang, Laina D Mercer, Samuel Adjei, Tsiri Agbenyega, Scott Anderson, Daniel Ansong, Dennis K Bii, Patrick BY Buabeng, Sean English, Nicholas Fitzgerald, Jonna Grimsby, Simon K Kariuki, Kephas Otieno, François Roman, Aaron M Samuels, Nelli Westercamp, Christian F Ockenhouse, Opokua Ofori-Anyinam, Cynthia K Lee, Bronwyn L MacInnis, Dyann F Wirth, Peter B Gilbert, Daniel E Neafsey
PMCID: PMC10690350  PMID: 38045387

Abstract

Background

The only licensed malaria vaccine, RTS,S/AS01 E , confers moderate protection against symptomatic disease. Because many malaria infections are asymptomatic, we conducted a large-scale longitudinal parasite genotyping study of samples from a clinical trial exploring how vaccine dosing regimen affects vaccine efficacy (VE).

Methods

1,500 children aged 5–17 months were randomized to receive four different RTS,S/AS01 E regimens or a rabies control vaccine in a phase 2b clinical trial in Ghana and Kenya. We evaluated the time to the first new genotypically detected infection and the total number of new infections during two follow-up periods in over 36K participant specimens. We performed a post hoc analysis of VE based on malaria infection status at first vaccination and force of infection.

Results

We observed significant and comparable VE (25–43%, 95% CI union 9–53%) against first new infection for all four RTS,S/AS01 E regimens across both follow-up periods (12 and 20 months). Each RTS,S/AS01 E regimen significantly reduced the number of new infections in the 20-month follow-up period (control mean 4.1 vs. RTS,S/AS01 E mean 2.6–3.0). VE against first new infection was significantly higher in participants who were malaria-infected (68%; 95% CI, 50 to 80%) versus uninfected (37%; 95% CI, 23 to 48%) at the first vaccination (P=0.0053) and in participants experiencing greater force of infection between dose 1 and 3 (P=0.059).

Conclusions

All tested dosing regimens blocked some infections to a similar degree. Improved VE in participants infected during vaccination could suggest new strategies for highly efficacious malaria vaccine development and implementation. ( ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03276962 )

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES