Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2023 Nov 20;120(48):e2305541120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305541120

Monopole-like orbital-momentum locking and the induced orbital transport in topological chiral semimetals

Qun Yang a,b,1, Jiewen Xiao b, Iñigo Robredo a,c, Maia G Vergniory a,c, Binghai Yan b,1, Claudia Felser a,1
PMCID: PMC10691347  PMID: 37983495

Significance

In this work, we reveal a monopole-like orbital angular momentum (OAM) texture on the Fermi surfaces of topological chiral semimetals with B20 structures and predict a large OAM-induced orbital Hall effect (OHE) and orbital magnetoelectric (OME) effect when an electric current is applied. By comparing five B20 compounds (CoSi, RhSi, PdGa, PtAl, and PtGa), we find that the orbital effects are insensitive to the spin–orbital coupling. The OHE and OME are much larger than their spin counterpart. Different enantiomers exhibit the same OHE but the opposite OME. Our results about the nontrivial OAM textures provide a perspective to understand the exotic orbital effects in topological chiral semimetals and pave the way for their experimental realization.

Keywords: chirality, orbital magnetoelectric, orbital Hall effect, orbital angular momentum, topological chiral semimetals

Abstract

The interplay between chirality and topology nurtures many exotic electronic properties. For instance, topological chiral semimetals display multifold chiral fermions that manifest nontrivial topological charge and spin texture. They are an ideal playground for exploring chirality-driven exotic physical phenomena. In this work, we reveal a monopole-like orbital-momentum locking texture on the three-dimensional Fermi surfaces of topological chiral semimetals with B20 structures (e.g., RhSi and PdGa). This orbital texture enables a large orbital Hall effect (OHE) and a giant orbital magnetoelectric (OME) effect in the presence of current flow. Different enantiomers exhibit the same OHE which can be converted to the spin Hall effect by spin-orbit coupling in materials. In contrast, the OME effect is chirality-dependent and much larger than its spin counterpart. Our work reveals the crucial role of orbital texture for understanding OHE and OME effects in topological chiral semimetals and paves the path for applications in orbitronics, spintronics, and enantiomer recognition.


Chirality refers to a spatial asymmetric feature enabling objects to appear in two nonsuperimposable mirror-image forms (enantiomers). Opposite enantiomers may exhibit different and even completely opposite physical/chemical properties and behave differently in response to external stimuli. This has brought significant consequences and applications in chemistry and biology (1), for example, in enantioselective catalysis and drug design. In condensed matter physics, due to the rich interplay between chiral symmetry, relativistic effects, and electronic transport, the chiral solid crystals constitute an ideal playground for exploring exotic physical phenomena. A variety of chirality-driven unconventional electronic transport, such as electrical magnetochiral anisotropy (2), chirality-induced spin selectivity (37), and unidirectional magnetoresistance (MR) (8) have been found in different systems. It is of fundamental interest to broaden the spectrum of chirality-driven physical properties and related phenomena that can lead to practical applications.

Recently, chirality was found to induce topological electronic property with orbital-momentum locking in DNA-like molecules (9) and results in chirality-induced spin selectivity (5) and anomalous circularly polarized light emission (10). Compared to molecules, chiral solid crystals may exhibit more intriguing orbital texture that brings exotic physical/chemical phenomena, yet to be explored. The topological chiral semimetals in the space group (SG) P213, such as PdGa, PtAl, and CoSi (1115), which are characterized by multifold band crossings with large Chern numbers in the bulk state and unique Fermi arcs at surfaces, are of particular interest. These crystals display promising applications in chiral catalysis (1518). Exploring the orbital effect is also helpful to understand the relation between the band structure topology and enantioselective processes, such as enantiomer recognition or chiral catalysis.

In this work, we study the orbital texture in the band structure of topological chiral semimetals. The results indicate that for the opposite enantiomers of topological chiral semimetals, the sign reverses in orbital polarization. Near the multifold band crossing points, the orbital angular momentum (OAM) texture exhibits monopole-like characteristics, similar to the Berry curvature distribution of Weyl points in momentum space. We demonstrate that such OAM texture leads to a large orbital Hall effect (OHE) and orbital magnetoelectric (OME) effect, which is insensitive to the spin-orbital coupling (SOC) strength of the materials. Among all five topological chiral semimetals that we studied, RhSi and PdGa are the most promising candidates for detecting the large orbital Hall conductivity (OHC) and current-induced orbital magnetization in the experiment. Furthermore, we point out that OHE is enantiomer-independent while the sign of the OME effect manifests the chirality. Our study reveals the exotic electronic orbital texture induced by chirality and indicates a way to utilize the orbital transport for applications in orbitronics, spintronics, and enantiomers recognition.

Results and Discussion

The widely studied topological multifold semimetals, such as CoSi, RhSi, PdGa, PtAl, and PtGa, crystallize in the B20 (FeSi-type) crystal structure with structural chirality (1114). They belong to the Sohncke nonsymmorphic SG P213 (No. 198) generated by twofold screw rotations 21x = {C2x | 0.5, 0.5, 0}, 21y = {C2y | 0, 0.5, 0.5} and diagonal threefold rotations C3,111 = {C3,111 | 0.0, 0.0, 0}. The combination of these symmetry operations gives rise to three two-fold screw rotation axes along the axes of the Cartesian coordinate system and four three-fold rotation axes along the cube's main diagonals. The material is nonmagnetic; therefore, the time-reversal symmetry (TRS) and its combination with other crystal symmetries also belong to the symmetry group. Fig. 1A depicts the crystal structures of two PdGa enantiomers (enantiomers A and B) with winding of the helices related by an inversion operation, where structural chirality determines electronic properties. Fig. 1 B and C show symmetry-protected multifold band crossings appearing at the Γ and R points in the bulk, which carry the Chern numbers of −4 and 4, respectively. The sign is reversed in the opposite enantiomer.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Chiral crystal structure in real space and chiral multifold fermions in reciprocal space in PdGa enantiomers. (A) Chiral crystal structures for the PdGa enantiomers (namely enantiomer A and enantiomer B). Blue and yellow atoms represent Pd and Ga atoms, respectively. Because of the C2 screw rotation symmetry, the opposite chiralities can be distinguished by the helix formed by Pd atoms. (B) Cubic BZ features multifold fermions in PdGa enantiomers, which are located at the Γ/R points with Chern numbers −4/+4, respectively. Different enantiomers represent opposite topological charges. (C) Band structure of PdGa calculated with SOC wherein eight bands: α1, α2, β1, β2, γ1, γ2, δ1, and δ2 intersect the Fermi energy and are marked by the colors. The subscript 1(2) represents the down (up)-shifted spin-split bands.

Herein, we present the detailed symmetry analyses of the OAM in topological chiral semimetals. Despite the atomic orbital being quenched in solids, the OAM can be estimated based on Bloch wave functions. The general Lnγ(k) component of the OAM for band n at point k is given by (1921):

Lnγ(k)=2ϵαβγmeImmn<n(k)|v^α|m(k)><m(k)|v^β|n(k)>En(k)Em(k)+iη, [1]

where α,β,γ=x,y,z, ϵαβγ is the Levi-Civita symbol. En(k) is the eigenvalue for the nth eigenstate of |nk> at the momentum k. v^α(β) is the α(β) component of the band velocity operator with v^αβ=1H^kkα(β), H^ is the Hamiltonian operator, and η = 0.1 meV represents a very small broadening for numerical reasons.

OAM is a pseudovector that transforms like spin under symmetry operations. The key OAM relationships for the materials in SG P213 are listed in SI Appendix, Table S1, which define the constraints on the OAM in the k-space. Particularly, the OAM of the opposite enantiomers is related by the inversion operation as follows: LAkLB-k, LB-k=-LBk, where the latter equality is enforced by TRS. This relation shows that the OAM changes sign on opposite enantiomers. As a consequence of TRS, the OAM changes sign on reversing the momentum. Furthermore, at any time-reversal invariant momenta, the OAM must vanish since the OAM changes sign while the momentum is left invariant. Away from the high-symmetry points, the symmetry relations for various OAM components along the high-symmetry lines or planes can be further discussed. For instance, the Γ–Χ high-symmetry line is left invariant by the 21x axis. Therefore, we have Lx(kx,0,0)0, Ly(kx,0,0)=0, and Lz(kx,0,0)=0. This relation can be translated to the other X-point-directed paths [(0, ky, 0) and (0, 0, kz)] using permutation of the indices. Another instance is of the Γ-R high-symmetry line which remains invariant under the C3 operation: Lx(k,k,k)=Ly(k,k,k)=Lz(k,k,k). More detailed OAM symmetry properties for the materials in SG P213 can be deduced directly from SI Appendix, Table S1.

We then performed the density-functional theory (DFT) calculations (22, 23) (see Methods section for calculation details) for realistic bulk compounds. Since the symmetry of Wannier functions is essential for the real material OAM calculations, we projected the ab initio DFT Bloch wavefunction into highly symmetric atomic-orbital-like Wannier functions and generated the corresponding tight-binding (TB) model Hamiltonian that fully respects the symmetry of corresponding materials. Using the obtained TB Hamiltonian, the OAM can be numerically computed based on Eq. 1. Fig. 2A shows the OAM-resolved band structure along the R–Γ–R high symmetry line for the two PdGa enantiomers. The OAM-resolved band structures for other topological chiral semimetals including CoSi, RhSi, AlPt, and PtGa, along different momentum directions [001], [111], and [110], are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S1. As expected, ab initio calculations are in good agreement with the expected OAM symmetry properties: the orbital polarization reverses sign at opposite momentum and the OAM texture changes sign for the opposite enantiomers. Furthermore, owing to the noncentrosymmetric crystal structure of the material, SOC splits the energy bands. The spin-split bands carry the opposite spin texture and approximately the same OAM, which can be observed from the plot of the OAM vector fields for spin-split Fermi surface (FS) pairs as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

OAM texture in PdGa enantiomers. (A) Band dispersion with the OAM of L111 for the electrons transmitted through [111] direction in enantiomers A (Left) and B (Right). Within one enantiomer, OAM exhibits opposite signs at +k and −k. Furthermore, OAM is enantiomer-dependent; it reverses the sign for the opposite enantiomer. The absolute value of the OAM |Lk| is indicated in the color bar. (B) OAM texture around chiral fermions in two PdGa enantiomers. The Fermi pockets are formed by the band γ2 centered at the Γ and R points, respectively. OAM texture exhibits monopole-like feature. The chemical potential was chosen as 30 meV above the nodes.

The topological chiral semimetal PdGa displays a nontrivial momentum dependence of the Berry curvature at multifold fermions Γ and R (Fig. 1B). Since the OAM has an intimate connection to the Berry curvature (24), it is of fundamental interest to study the OAM texture distributions near Γ and R. Fig. 2B shows the Fermi pockets that are around 30 meV above the chiral fermions Γ and R, respectively, which are formed by the band γ2 in Fig. 1C. Moreover, SI Appendix, Fig. S3 shows the FS pockets near the chiral fermions. The OAM texture was found to be similar to the Berry curvature monopole. In enantiomer A, the OAM texture exhibits a monopole-like feature at Γ (source) and R (drain). As expected, this OAM texture reverses in enantiomer B.

The nontrivial OAM texture in topological chiral semimetals further induces orbital transport phenomena. Here we focus on OHE and ME effect. OHE (25) is a phenomenon of the generation of transverse OAM current in response to an applied electric field, which is an orbital analog to the transverse spin angular momentum current in the spin Hall effect (SHE) (26, 27). In OHE, the applied electric field along β-direction (Eβ) and the induced orbital current along α-direction with orbital polarization along γ-direction (Jαγ) are related by the OHC tensor (σαβγ) as Jαγ=σαβγEβ. With the material-specific TB Hamiltonian, the σαβγ can be calculated by the Kubo formula (25):

σαβγ=eBZdk(2π)3nfnkΩn,αβL^γk,
Ωn,αβL^γk=-2Immn<nkjαL^γmk><mkv^βnk>(Enk-Emk)2. [2]

Here, J^αL^γ=12{v^α,L^γ} is the conventional orbital current operator, Ωn,αβL^γk is referred to as the orbital Berry curvature, L^γ is the orbital operator, and fnk is the Fermi–Dirac distribution function. For the integral in Eq. 2, the k-space integration was performed on a uniform 240 × 240 × 240 k-grid.

To illustrate the general properties of the OHE for all chiral structures, we present the OHC tensor for 11 chiral point groups using the TENSOR program from the Bilbao Crystallographic Server (28), as shown in SI Appendix, Table S2. Specially, topological chiral semimetals belong to the T point group. The existing symmetries force many tensor elements of σαβγ to be zero and relate them to each other as σxyz=σyzx=σzxy and σyxz=σzyx=σxzy, leaving only two groups of nonzero elements. Fig. 3 shows the calculated OHC as well as SHC (spin Hall conductivity) for five selected topological chiral semimetals, in which the Fermi energy lies at the charge neutral point. We found that the magnitude of OHC in these compounds is in general gigantic and insensitive to SOC, reaching approximately ~3,000(/e)(Ω cm)-1. In contrast, the SHC shows a clear correlation with the SOC strength for different compounds, whose value is of one order of magnitude smaller than OHC. This reflects that the OHE is more robust and can be converted into SHE when the SOC is present. Furthermore, we point out that different enantiomers exhibit the same OHE/SHE since the inversion operation does not change the sign of the OHC/SHC tensor.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Nonzero tensor element σxyz of the OHC and SHC for five topological chiral semimetals. The Fermi energy is set to the charge neutral point, which is close to the real chemical potential in materials.

To elucidate the origin of the OHC change in different compounds, we show the energy-dependent OHC σxyz in Fig. 4A and k-resolved orbital Berry curvature Ωxyz of the nth band in Fig. 4B, where red (blue) denotes a positive (negative) contribution. As shown clearly, for CoSi and RhSi, at the charge neutral point, the hole pockets near Γ and electron pockets near R make a dominant contribution. RhSi exhibits larger Ωxyz near Γ than CoSi and therefore shows stronger σxyz. For PtAl, PtGa, and PdGa, the hole bands at M shift above the Fermi energy compared to RhSi/CoSi, attributing to different natures between Pt/Pd-d and Rh/Co-d orbitals and consequently their electron bands at Γ shift down to balance the charge neutrality. Because electron bands at Γ contribute negative Ωxyz, PtAl, PtGa, and PdGa exhibit smaller σxyz than RhSi.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Energy-dependent OHC response and the corresponding orbital Berry curvature-resolved band structure for topological chiral semimetals. (A) OHC σxyz as a function of energy. (B) The corresponding local Ωxyz(k) -resolved band structures along high symmetry k path.

Our results reveal a large orbital Hall response in topological chiral semimetals, which is insensitive to the SOC strength, making these materials excellent candidates for detecting the OHE. It was theoretically demonstrated that the orbital current in OHE can be converted to the spin current via the SOC from the contact (29). Furthermore, the OHE can also generate large nonreciprocal magnetoresistance (MR) when employing magnetic contact. These strategies pave the way to probe the OHE in experiments. Noteworthy, the recent experiment confirmed this prediction by measuring a large effective spin Hall angle in Cu and Al through OHE to SHE conversion by the interfacial SOC (30). This will inspire experimental detection of OHE in chiral semimetals proposed in this work.

In addition to the OHE, the intrinsic OAM texture in topological chiral semimetal is also crucial for the OME effect. Generally, the ME effect requires an applied electric field in the j-direction (Ej) to induce magnetization in the i-direction (Mi), which are related via response coefficients aij by the response equations Mi=i,jaijEj. aij is the ME susceptibility, which can be derived from the standard linear response theory as follows (31, 32).

aij=-τeBZdk(2π)3nM~nk,ivnk,jdfEnkdEnk,
Mnk,i=Snk,i+mnk,i, [3]

where i,j,k=x,y,z and τ is the relaxation time. Particularly, Mnk,i is the magnetic moment of Bloch electrons for the band n at point k consisting of the spin magnetic moment Snk,i=<nk12gμBσink> and orbital magnetic moment mnk,i=-e2meLnik. Here, μB=e2me is the Bohr magneton, g denotes the Lande g-factor set to the value 2, and Lnik is the OAM defined in Eq. 1. Owing to the symmetry properties of the OAM, the total magnetic moment in topological chiral semimetals is zero in the equilibrium state because of cancellations between the contributions from k and −k. However, an electrical current can induce an imbalance between the populations at k and −k, thus generating nonzero magnetic moment and a nonzero ME susceptibility aij.

Constrained by the crystal symmetry in topological chiral semimetals, only three ME susceptibility tensor exists and they are equal as axx=ayy=azz=a0 (33). Particularly, a0 is reversed by the inversion operation, giving a0A-a0B for the opposite enantiomers. We calculated the ME coefficient, a0, based on the first-principles band structure. It is noted that the relaxation time assumption in Eq. 3 limits the prediction of a0. Experimentally, the observed relaxation time for topological chiral semimetals is approximately 0.1 ~ 4 ps (13, 3438), which depends on the crystal quality, temperature, and carrier concentration. To study the effect of intrinsic band structure on the ME response of materials, the relaxation time is assumed to be 1 ps. As shown in Fig. 5 A and B, these topological chiral semimetals exhibit a large ME response. Here we assume Ex=105 Vm-1, and the resulting total magnetization M0=a0Ex can reach the values of 0.063, 0.102, 0.077, 0.029, and −0.043 µB/nm3 for CoSi, RhSi, PdGa, PtAl, and PtGa, respectively. The current-induced magnetization here is generally ten times larger than the reported spin magnetization in the strong Rashba systems of Au (111) and Bi/Ag (111), the surface of topological insulator α-Sn (001) surface (3941), and comparable to the orbital magnetization in strained twisted bilayer graphene (0.20 µB/nm2) obtained with a large relaxation time of 10 ps, (42) as listed in SI Appendix, Table S3. Notably, M0 the varies considerably when the chemical potential is shifted. As shown in Fig. 5A, the M0 of CoSi, RhSi, PdGa, and PtAl increases monotonically as the chemical potential is lowered, reaching its maximum value of 0.097, 0.170, 0.353, and 0.354 µB/nm3 at −0.198, −0.309, −0.723, and −0.663 eV, respectively. Thus, the hole doping in these compounds is an effective way to achieve an enhanced ME response. For PtGa, it exhibits a negative M0 close to the Fermi energy. The magnitude of the M0 first increases as the chemical potential is lowered to about −0.06 eV. Further lowering of chemical potential results in a decrease of M0 to 0 µB/nm3 at −0.186 eV, where the M0 reverses sign. Then, the M0 becomes positive and increases monotonically which eventually reaches the maximum value of 0.281 µB/nm3 at −0.624 eV. The Fermi energy–dependent plot in Fig. 5A provides a general route to optimizing the ME response in these materials.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The ME response in topological chiral semimetals. (A) Energy-dependent electric current-induced magnetization (M0) in enantiomer A for all five topological multifold semimetals. (B) Electrical current-induced magnetization in enantiomers A (M0A) and B (M0B), where MxA=MyA=MzA=M0A and M0A=a0A·Ex. The corresponding orbital (M0A,O) and spin (M0A,S) contributions in enantiomer A are indicated. The total M0A (M0A=M0A,O+M0A,S) is mainly dominated by the orbital part (M0A,O). The electric field is Ex=105Vm-1. The Fermi energy is set to the charge neutral point. (C and D) are the schematics of the experimental setups to measure the chirality-dependent ME response in opposite enantiomers.

Different ME magnitudes in five materials can be understood by M0-resolved band structures as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S5. For all these compounds, large contributions to M0 were found along the Γ–X, Γ–M, and Γ–R high symmetry lines. At the charge neutral point, the hole pockets near Γ and electron pockets near R of RhSi contribute a larger M0 than CoSi and therefore RhSi shows a stronger ME response. For PtAl, PtGa, and PdGa, because the electron bands at Γ and hole bands along the Γ–M carry negative M0, PtAl, PtGa, and PdGa exhibit smaller M0 than RhSi, and especially, PtGa displays a negative value.

Being directly linked to the chirality-dependent OAM texture in topological chiral semimetals, the magnetization reverses its sign for opposite enantiomers: M0A=-M0B, as further confirmed by the numerical calculations shown in Fig. 5B. M0A was further analyzed and its orbital (M0A,O) and spin (M0A,S) contributions were calculated using Eq. 3. As shown in Fig. 5B, the orbital magnetization dominates the M0A, whereas the spin magnetization is almost negligible attributing to the antiparallel spin of spin-split bands which produces a small spin magnetization owing to the cancellations between the contributions from spin-split FSs (SI Appendix, Figs. S6 and S7). The observed phenomenon is similar to the Rashba–Edelstein effect found in the noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnets (43).

To date, studies on the bulk ME effect in chiral materials are rather limited (8, 44, 45). The electric current-induced bulk magnetization was recently observed in chiral crystals of tellurium (46) and CrNb3S6 (45) by NMR and superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), respectively. The physical origin of the observed phenomenon remains elusive, which was usually explained on the basis of the current-induced spin magnetization arising from the spin imbalance in the spin-split bands. Theoretically, we note that the ME response of some Kramers Weyl semimetals (47, 48) and chiral crystals of TaSi2 (49) was investigated and the mechanism based on spin/orbital texture was proposed. Our results reveal a dominating role of the exotic OAM texture of Bloch electrons for the ME effect, which is independent of the SOC strength. Furthermore, the evolution of the ME effect in different materials and the related mechanism was discussed. We found that among all five topological chiral semimetals, RhSi and PdGa are the most promising candidates for detecting the large ME response. We expect it can be experimentally measured using NMR (46), SQUID (45, 50), and Kerr spectroscopy (51). Particularly, we found that this ME response is enantiomer-dependent, manifesting as the opposite sign for opposite enantiomers, which paves a way for enantiomer recognition. Based on symmetry and numerical analyses, we propose a schematic to measure the current-induced magnetization in topological chiral semimetals, as illustrated in Fig. 5 C and D. By injecting the same electric current along the x-direction in PdGa enantiomers A and B, positive and negative magnetization in the x-direction can be observed for respective enantiomers.

In addition to the OAM-induced OHE and ME effect, the OAM can be further detected by the MR measurement, similar to the case in the chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) in chiral molecules. When contacting the chiral materials with the ferromagnetic (FM) electrodes, OAM can generate the MR effect. In principle, it requires SOC to couple the spin in the FM electrode with the OAM in chiral crystals (9). Therefore, we predict that the induced MR is proportional to the SOC of the materials. MR can also be measured by applying an external magnetic field parallel to the current, which corresponds to the electric magnetochiral anisotropy (52). In this case, OAM directly interacts with the magnetic field (53). Thus, we predict that MR is insensitive to SOC here. If both MR measurements can be conducted, they will be helpful to resolve the roles of OAM and SOC in chirality-driven magneto-transport. Furthermore, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) with circularly polarized photons is also a promising route to detect the OAM. Recent studies have shown that circular dichroism (CD) can probe the chiral OAM structure in the surface states of topological insulator Bi2Se3 (54). We expect that CD-ARPES can be used to probe the OAM structure in topological chiral semimetals. Moreover, the OAM texture plays an essential role in the CISS effect in molecular devices (9, 55) and anomalous circularly polarized light emission (10).

In summary, we perform both theoretical and first-principle analyses to study the OAM texture in several typical topological chiral semimetals. We find that the OAM texture displays significant chirality dependence that manifests in a sign reversal in the momentum space for opposite enantiomers. Near multifold chiral fermions, the OAM texture exhibits unique orbital-momentum locking with characteristics similar to that of the Berry curvature monopole. We demonstrate that such OAM texture in topological chiral semimetals leads to giant chirality-independent OHE and chirality-dependent OME effects, which are insensitive to the SOC strength. For five topological chiral semimetals CoSi, RhSi, PdGa, PtAl, and PtGa, RhSi shows the largest amplitudes of OHC as well as the current-induced orbital magnetization, which facilitates experimental measurements of the OHE and OME effect in this material. We expect that the induced magnetization can also induce higher-order responses such as the nonlinear anomalous Hall effect (56, 57), chirality-induced nonreciprocal MR (58, 59), orbital current-spin current conversion (30), and exotic light-matter interaction (10).

Methods

All DFT calculations were implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (22, 23). The exchange-correlation potential is described in the generalized gradient approximation, following the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof parametrization scheme (60). The k-point grid was set to 8 × 8 × 8, and the convergence of the total energy convergency was chosen to be 10−6eV. The DFT calculations combined with the Full-Potential Local-Orbital package were then applied to produce highly symmetric atomic-orbital-like Wannier functions and the corresponding TB model Hamiltonian (61).

Supplementary Material

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Acknowledgments

Q.Y. thanks Changjiang Yi and Hengxin Tan for helpful discussions. This work was financially supported by the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant No. 742068 “TOPMAT”). We also acknowledge funding from the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) through SFB 1143 (project ID. 247310070) and the Wurzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter ct.qmat (EXC2147, project ID. 390858490). M.G.V. and C.F. thank the DFG (German Research Foundation) for 5249 (QUAST). I.R. and M.G.V. acknowledge Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (grant PID2019-109905GBC21). M.G.V. thanks partial support from ERC grant agreement no. 101020833. B.Y. acknowledges the financial support by the MINERVA Stiftung, the ERC (Consolidator Grant “NonlinearTopo”, No. 815869), and the Israel Science Foundation (ISF, No. 2932/21).

Author contributions

Q.Y., B.Y., and C.F. designed research; Q.Y. performed research; Q.Y., J.X., I.R., and M.G.V. analyzed data; Q.Y. and B.Y. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

Reviewers: H.W., Institute of Physics, CAS; and H.Z., Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster.

Contributor Information

Qun Yang, Email: Qun.Yang@cpfs.mpg.de.

Binghai Yan, Email: binghai.yan@weizmann.ac.il.

Claudia Felser, Email: Claudia.Felser@cpfs.mpg.de.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

All study data are included in this article and/or SI Appendix.

Supporting Information

References

  • 1.Siegel J. S., Homochiral imperative of molecular evolution. Chirality 10, 24–27 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guo C., et al. , Switchable chiral transport in charge-ordered kagome metal CsV3Sb5. Nature 611, 461–466 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Inui A., et al. , Chirality-induced spin-polarized state of a chiral crystal CrNb3S6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166602 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shiota K., et al. , Chirality-induced spin polarization over macroscopic distances in chiral disilicide crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 126602 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Naaman R., Paltiel Y., Waldeck D. H., Chiral molecules and the electron spin. Nat. Rev. Chem 3, 250–260 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wolf Y., Liu Y., Xiao J., Park N., Yan B., Unusual spin polarization in the chirality-induced spin selectivity. ACS Nano 16, 18601–18607 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu T., et al. , Linear and nonlinear two-terminal spin-valve effect from chirality-induced spin selectivity. ACS Nano 14, 15983–15991 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Calavalle F., et al. , Gate-tuneable and chirality-dependent charge-to-spin conversion in tellurium nanowires. Nat. Mater. 21, 526–532 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu Y., Xiao J., Koo J., Yan B., Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of DNA-like materials. Nat. Mater. 20, 638–644 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wan L., Liu Y., Fuchter M. J., Yan B., Anomalous circularly polarized light emission in organic light-emitting diodes caused by orbital–momentum locking. Nat. Photon. 17, 193–199 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schröter N. B. M., et al. , Observation and control of maximal Chern numbers in a chiral topological semimetal. Science 369, 179–183 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sessi P., et al. , Handedness-dependent quasiparticle interference in the two enantiomers of the topological chiral semimetal PdGa. Nat. Commun. 11, 3507 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao M., et al. , Observation of giant spin-split Fermi-arc with maximal Chern number in the chiral topological semimetal PtGa. Nat. Commun. 11, 2033 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chang G., et al. , Unconventional photocurrents from surface fermi arcs in topological chiral semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166404 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang Q., et al. , Topological engineering of Pt-group-metal-based chiral crystals toward high-efficiency hydrogen evolution catalysts. Adv. Mater. 32, 1908518 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yakutovich A. V., Hoja J., Passerone D., Tkatchenko A., Pignedoli C. A., Hidden beneath the surface: Origin of the observed enantioselective adsorption on PdGa(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1401–1408 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stolz S., et al. , Asymmetric elimination reaction on chiral metal surfaces. Adv. Mater. 34, 2104481 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li G., et al. , Observation of asymmetric oxidation catalysis with B20 chiral crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202303296 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oppeneer P. M., Magneto-optical spectroscopy in the valence-band energy regime: Relationship to the magnetocrystalline anisotropy1Contribution presented at the ‘International Workshop on Soft X-ray Magneto-Optics’, Institut für Angewandte Physik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, 13 November 1997.1. J. Magn. Magn. Mater.188, 275–285 (1998).
  • 20.Thonhauser T., Ceresoli D., Vanderbilt D., Resta R., Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137205 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xiao D., Shi J., Niu Q., Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kresse G., Furthmüller J., Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kresse G., Furthmüller J., Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schüler M., et al. , Local Berry curvature signatures in dichroic angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy from two-dimensional materials. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2730 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Go D., Jo D., Kim C., Lee H.-W., Intrinsic spin and orbital hall effects from orbital texture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hirsch J. E., Spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834–1837 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sinova J., Valenzuela S. O., Wunderlich J., Back C. H., Jungwirth T., Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1260 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aroyo M. I., Kirov A., Capillas C., Perez-Mato J. M., Wondratschek H., Bilbao crystallographic server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Crystallogr. 62, 115–128 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xiao J., Liu Y., Yan B., “Detection of the orbital hall effect by the orbital-spin conversion” in Memorial Volume for Shoucheng Zhang, Lian B., Liu C. X., Demler E., Kivelson S., Qi X., Eds. (World Scientific, 2021), pp. 353–364. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rothschild A., et al. , Generation of spin currents by the orbital Hall effect in Cu and Al and their measurement by a Ferris-wheel ferromagnetic resonance technique at the wafer level. Phys. Rev. B 106, 144415 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xiao D., Chang M.-C., Niu Q., Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhong S., Moore J. E., Souza I., Gyrotropic magnetic effect and the magnetic moment on the fermi surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 077201 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.He W.-Y., Law K. T., Magnetoelectric effects in gyrotropic superconductors. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012073 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu X., et al. , Crystal growth and quantum oscillations in the topological chiral semimetal CoSi. Phys. Rev. B 100, 045104 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zeng X.-Y., et al. , Quantum oscillations and weak anisotropic resistivity in the chiral fermion semimetal PdGa. Phys. Rev. B 106, 205120 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Saini V., Sasmal S., Kulkarni R., Singh B., Thamizhavel A., Analysis of the unconventional chiral fermions in a non-centrosymmetric chiral crystal PtAl. Phys. Rev. B 106, 125126 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu S., et al. , Quantum oscillations and electronic structure in the large-chern-number topological chiral semimetal PtGa*. Chin. Phys. Lett. 37, 107504 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Maulana L. Z., et al. , Optical conductivity of multifold fermions: The case of RhSi. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023018 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rojas-Sánchez J.-C., et al. , Spin to charge conversion at room temperature by spin pumping into a new type of topological insulator: α-Sn films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 096602 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Johansson A., Henk J., Mertig I., Edelstein effect in Weyl semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 97, 085417 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Johansson A., Henk J., Mertig I., Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effect for anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas and topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 93, 195440 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.He W.-Y., Goldhaber-Gordon D., Law K. T., Giant orbital magnetoelectric effect and current-induced magnetization switching in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Commun. 11, 1650 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Salemi L., Berritta M., Nandy A. K., Oppeneer P. M., Orbitally dominated Rashba-Edelstein effect in noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnets. Nat. Commun. 10, 5381 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Furukawa T., Watanabe Y., Ogasawara N., Kobayashi K., Itou T., Current-induced magnetization caused by crystal chirality in nonmagnetic elemental tellurium. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023111 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nabei Y., et al. , Current-induced bulk magnetization of a chiral crystal CrNb3S6. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 052408 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Furukawa T., Shimokawa Y., Kobayashi K., Itou T., Observation of current-induced bulk magnetization in elemental tellurium. Nat. Commun. 8, 954 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.He W.-Y., Xu X. Y., Law K. T., Kramers Weyl semimetals as quantum solenoids and their applications in spin-orbit torque devices. Commun. Phys. 4, 1–8 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Flicker F., et al. , Chiral optical response of multifold fermions. Phys. Rev. B 98, 155145 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roy A., et al. , Long-range current-induced spin accumulation in chiral crystals. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 1–7 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grover S., et al. , Chern mosaic and Berry-curvature magnetism in magic-angle graphene. Nat. Phys. 18, 885–892 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu L., et al. , Quantized Faraday and Kerr rotation and axion electrodynamics of a 3D topological insulator. Science 354, 1124–1127 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rikken G. L. J. A., Fölling J., Wyder P., Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236602 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu Y., Holder T., Yan B., Chirality-induced giant unidirectional magnetoresistance in twisted bilayer graphene. The Innovation 2, 100085 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Park S. R., et al. , Chiral orbital-angular momentum in the surface states of Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 046805 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Naaman R., Waldeck D. H., Spintronics and chirality: Spin selectivity in electron transport through chiral molecules. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 263–281 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sodemann I., Fu L., Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang C.-P., et al. , Giant nonlinear Hall effect in strained twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 106, L041111 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tokura Y., Nagaosa N., Nonreciprocal responses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials. Nat. Commun. 9, 3740 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Xiao J., Yan B., Magnetochiral polarization and high order transport in DNA type chiral materials. arXiv [Preprint] (2022). 10.48550/arXiv.2201.03623 (24 December 2022). [DOI]
  • 60.Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M., Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Koepernik K., Eschrig H., Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743–1757 (1999). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix 01 (PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All study data are included in this article and/or SI Appendix.


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES