Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Dec 1;18(12):e0295320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295320

Associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

Ting Zou 1, Xiaohui Zhou 1,*, Qinwen Wang 2, Yongjie Zhao 1, Meisheng Zhu 1, Lei Zhang 1, Wei Chen 1, Pari Abuliz 1, Haijun Miao 1, Keyimu Kabinur 1, Kader Alimu 1
Editor: Masaki Mogi3
PMCID: PMC10691689  PMID: 38039290

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in elderly people in Xinjiang, China, and to screen out genes whose DNA methylation could distinguish AD and MCI.

Materials and methods

37 AD, 40 MCI and 80 controls were included in the present study. DNA methylation assay was done using quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). Genotyping was done using Sanger sequencing.

Results

DNA methylation levels of ADCY2, MAP2K1 and AKT1 were significantly different among AD, MCI and controls. In the comparisons of each two groups, AKT1 and MAP2K1’s methylation was both significantly different between AD and MCI (p < 0.05), whereas MAP2K1’s methylation was also significantly different between MCI and controls. Therefore, AKT1’s methylation was considered as the candidate serum marker to distinguish AD from MCI, and its association with AD was independent of APOE ε4 allele (p < 0.05). AKT1 hypermethylation was an independent risk factor for AD and MAP2K1 hypomethylation was an independent risk factor for MCI in logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study found that the serum of AKT1 hypermethylation is related to AD independently of APOE ε4, which was differentially expressed in the Entorhinal Cortex of the brain and was an independent risk factor for AD. It could be used as one of the candidate serum markers to distinguish AD and MCI. Serum of MAP2K1 hypomethylation is an independent risk factor for MCI.

Introduction

The incidence of aging-related diseases has increased significantly with the rapid progression of aging in society, which has increased the prevalence of neurological degenerative diseases rapidly, such as MCI and AD. MCI is a transitional stage of healthy aging to AD, which extent of cognitive decline and the clinical prophase has not reached the severity of AD yet [1]. 10% to 20% of MCI patients with clinical manifestations of memory impairment progress to AD each year [2, 3]. Since no efficient serum markers have been identified, cognitive function-related scales are usually used to distinguish AD and MCI.

DNA methylation is a major component of epigenetics, which is influenced by environmental factors leading to progression of diseases and providing new directions on pathogenesis and diagnosis of diseases. It could be the most promising blood marker for AD diagnosis in the future, and more effort should be devoted to the study of post-cellular DNA methylation [4]. Several studies have shown that the pathogenesis of AD and MCI is influenced by DNA methylation [59], but there are still few studies on DNA methylation of the same gene for comparison between AD and MCI.

Neuroimmune inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD [10], and it has been found that it might be developed during the MCI phase [11, 12]. Chemokine signaling pathway is simultaneously conducted in astrocytes and microglia, which are the main sites of neuroinflammation responses. Therefore, it is an important correlated pathway in the mechanism of neuroimmune inflammation in AD [1315].

At present, most research is on TREM2-DAP12 and CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in chemokine signaling pathway, which play an important role in neurodegenerative diseases and can regulate cognitive function and synaptic plasticity, especially in the hippocampus [16]. CXCR5 gene of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis has been found related to cognitive impairment [17], but its relationship with MCI or AD is still unclear, and there are few studies on DNA methylation differences of other genes in this pathway in AD and MCI.

Therefore, we used keywords to screen all the genes in the chemokine signaling pathway in the KEGG PATHWAY Database, and further selected the genes that had not been studied in DNA methylation through literature review and checked whether their CpG islands had methylation research value. Then seven genes (CXCL5, ADCY2, HCK, MAP2K1, AKT1, WASL, RAP1B) were screened out. Afterwards, in order to explore the associations of serum DNA methylation levels of the seven chemokine signaling pathway genes with AD and MCI, and further to screen out the genes which could distinguish AD from MCI, we investigated the associations of the serum DNA methylation levels in the promoter regions of the 7 genes with AD and MCI in Xinjiang, China. The genes whose DNA methylation levels were significantly different in AD were screened out and their expressions in the different brain regions in AD were verified by the AlzData database.

Materials and methods

Subjects

A total of 157 subjects were selected for the study, including 37 in the AD group, 40 in the MCI group and 80 in the control group. All of them were from a community-based epidemiological survey of cognitive impairment elderly people aged ≥60 years in Urumqi, Xinjiang from 2017 to 2018. The general conditions and clinical data of the three groups were shown in Table 1. Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University examined the project and found that it met the ethical requirements and approved the declaration. All the enrolled subjects had signed written informed consent forms.

Table 1. The baseline clinical data of the included subjects.

Characteristics AD (n = 37) MCI (n = 40) Controls (n = 80) p
Male / Female 20 / 17 20 / 20 40 / 40 0.911
Hypertension (Yes / No) 22 / 15 19 / 21 49 / 31 0.341
Diabetes (Yes / No) 16 / 21 13 / 27 44 / 36 0.060
Age (years) 77 (74, 82) 74.19 ± 8.03 75 (71.50, 81.00) 0.128
FBG (mmol / L) 5.32 (5.06, 6.28) 5.56 (5.05, 6.14) 5.48 (4.90, 6.32) 0.772
TG (mmol / L) 1.35 (0.93, 2.04) 1.23 (0.98, 1.42) 1.14 (0.91, 1.77) 0.489
TC (mmol / L) 4.46 ± 1.28 4.70 ± 1.15 4.40 ± 1.08 0.416
HDL (mmol / L) 1.44 ± 0.40 1.62 ± 0.52 1.54 (1.30, 1.82) 0.095
LDL (mmol / L) 3.03 ± 0.91 3.12 ± 0.84 2.90 ± 0.91 0.444
MMSE 19 (14,21) 22 (20,24) 27 (25,28) <0.001
MoCA 11 (5,15) 18 (15, 20) 23 (21, 25) <0.001

All participants received neuropsychological tests to assess the level of cognitive. Neuropsychological tests in Chinese version included: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Form (MoCA), Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Scale, the overall Deterioration Scale (GDS), the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and Kazakhstan Kinski ischemic Score (HIS) screening. Diagnosis criteria: A clinical diagnosis of AD or MCI was established according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Ⅳ(DSM-Ⅳ) [18]. Exclusion criteria for the current study were: (1) to exclude those with mental illness; (2) to exclude the brain dysfunction can cause neurological diseases such as cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, Parkinson’s disease, intracranial tumors; (3) to exclude depression; (4) to exclude patients with severe cardiopulmonary liver and kidney dysfunction, severe infectious diseases, severe endocrine disease patients and toxic encephalopathy patients.

Collection of blood samples and clinical data

Two venous blood samples were taken in the morning on an empty stomach from 157 subjects. One was used for the detection of general biochemical indicators, and the other whole blood was anticoagulated and stored in the refrigerator at -80°C for subsequent genomic DNA extraction. Clinical information was also collected from all subjects.

Screening genes

All genes of the chemokine signaling pathway were screened out from the KEGG PATHWAY Database website. In PubMed, the keyword "Alzheimer’s disease and gene name methylation" was used to search for all genes in the chemokine signaling pathway, and genes’ DNA methylation that had not been studied in previous studies were retained. All retained genes were checked CpG islands in UCSC. The genes with CpG islands and a single band in the gel running experiment were selected through the gel running experiment. Seven genes which were CXCL5, ADCY2, HCK, MAP2K1, AKT1, WASL and RAP1B in the chemokine signaling pathway were finally selected.

DNA preparation, methylation assay and genotyping

All the subjects’ fasting venous blood was extracted in the morning, added with EDTA anticoagulant and stored in a refrigerator at -80°C. We extracted DNA of blood samples using a blood genomic DNA extraction kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc. USA). The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were measured with an ND1000 ultra-micro UV spectrophotometer (Nanodrop1000, Wilmington, USA).

The structure and CpG island (CGI) near by the promoter region of the seven genes were searched by PubMed and UCSC databases, and the corresponding DNA sequences were obtained to design gene primer sequences (S1 Table). Bisulfite transformation method was used to transform genomic DNA (EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit) for accurate and rapid bisulfite methyl modification of DNA. Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP) was used to detect the level of DNA methylation (Roche LightCycler®480 instrument and LightCycler®480 SYBR Green I Master Mix kit). Genotyping of APOE rs7412 rs429358 was performed using Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing. Annealing temperatures of qMSP and PCR were shown in S1 Table.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software and R software (version 4.1.3) were used for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables are represented by X±S or M(IQR) depending on whether they are normally distributed or not. Two independent sample t-tests are used to compare normally distributed variables or continuous variables with data converted into a normal distribution. The Wilcox test was used for data that did not conform to normal distribution after conversion, and the chi-square test was used for comparison between classified variables. Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to analyze the association between gene methylation and subjects’ serum biochemical indicators.

Validation of expressions of AD-related chemokine signaling pathway genes in different brain regions

The expressions of AD-related chemokine signaling pathway genes in different brain regions between AD and normal brain tissues were validated by AlzData (www.alzdata.org). AlzData is a useful database that provides a large number of human brain gene expression profiling [19, 20].

Results

As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in gender, age, serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among AD group, MCI group and control group (p>0.05).

We compared the seven genes’ DNA methylation levels among three groups first. DNA methylation levels of ADCY2, MAP2K1, and AKT1 were significantly different among three groups (Table 2, p < 0.05); Breakdown analysis by gender showed that DNA methylation levels of ADCY2, MAP2K1, and AKT1 were significantly different in males, and DNA methylation levels of MAP2K1 and AKT1 were significantly different in females (Table 2, p < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis by carrying APOE ε4 allele showed that AKT1 methylation was significantly different in the non-APOE ε4 group (Table 2, p < 0.05).

Table 2. Comparisons of seven genes’ DNA methylation levels among AD group, MCI group and control group.

Genes Methylation levels p
AD MCI Control
Total
CXCL5 0.061(0.033, 0.108) 0.054(0.011, 0.094) 0.057(0.034, 0.085) 0.568
ADCY2 0.018(0.010, 0.032) 0.017(0.007, 0.044) 0.026(0.013, 5.697) 0.013
HCK 0.007(0.002, 0.016) 0.011(0.005, 0.023) 0.013(0.007, 0.020) 0.063
MAP2K1 1.369(1.063, 1.822) 0.328(0.192, 0.590) 0.724(0.462, 1.394) <0.001
AKT1 1.453(1.051,1.727) 0.616(0.334, 0.938) 0.765(0.380, 1.104) <0.001
WASL 5.276(1.808, 12.215) 4.064(0.820, 9.223) 7.140(4.741, 10.380) 0.06
RAP1B 8.854(4.225, 12.100) 6.047(2.345, 8.893) 7.376(4.116, 11.770) 0.145
Males
CXCL5 0.057(0.031, 0.080) 0.052(0.012, 0.094) 0.050(0.036, 0.094) 0.820
ADCY2 0.016(0.010, 0.026) 0.028(0.012, 0.050) 0.036(0.016, 7.298) 0.022
HCK 0.011(0.002, 0.022) 0.016(0.005, 0.032) 0.012(0.006, 0.021) 0.369
MAP2K1 1.345(1.103, 1.820) 0.313(0.229, 0.574) 1.192(0.559, 1.486) <0.001
AKT1 1.215(1.036, 1.578) 0.740(0.380, 0.903) 0.881(0.500, 1.178) <0.001
WASL 3.084 (1.245, 10.529) 3.716(0.688, 7.077) 7.545(4.662, 10.260) 0.067
RAP1B 10.208(4.191, 11.848) 6.564(0.919, 9.735) 7.611(4.321, 11.570) 0.200
Females
CXCL5 0.086(0.042, 0.132) 0.057(0.006, 0.148) 0.063(0.031, 0.084) 0.298
ADCY2 0.028(0.008, 0.036) 0.013(0.003, 0.029) 0.022(0.011, 1.552) 0.153
HCK 0.007 ± 0.006 0.010(0.005, 0.018) 0.013(0.008, 0.018) 0.056
MAP2K1 1.561 ± 0.889 0.353(0.082, 0.737) 0.504(0.378, 1.276) <0.001
AKT1 1.518(1.014, 1.826) 0.664 ± 0.462 0.765(0.384, 1.109) <0.001
WASL 5.815(3.133, 14.985) 4.945(1.155, 10.970) 6.745(4.749, 10.778) 0.663
RAP1B 6.777(3.905, 15.355) 5.420(4.016, 6.971) 6.956(2.684, 11.838) 0.665
APOE ε4+
CXCL5 0.059 ± 0.046 0.091(0.026, 0.151) 0.073(0.048, 0.102) 0.434
ADCY2 0.006(0.000, 0.019) 0.030 ± 0.026 0.020(0.015, 8.418) 0.061
HCK 0.002(0.001, 0.023) 0.011(0.007, 0.064) 0.013(0.008, 0.045) 0.276
MAP2K1 2.033 ± 1.572 0.401 ± 0.280 0.699(0.332, 1.336) 0.003
AKT1 1.508 ± 1.087 0.763 ± 0.451 0.648(0.376, 0.934) 0.071
WASL 3.088(1.102, 13.854) 5.309 ± 4.379 10.514 ± 6.938 0.087
RAP1B 4.900(2.381, 16.105) 6.371(3.509, 14.050) 7.073(3.541, 11.045) 0.998
APOE ε4-
CXCL5 0.064(0.033, 0.108) 0.049(0.010, 0.091) 0.050(0.032, 0.084) 0.168
ADCY2 0.023(0.013, 0.037) 0.016(0.010, 0.040) 0.029(0.012, 4.900) 0.062
HCK 0.008(0.003, 0.015) 0.011(0.005, 0.020) 0.013 (0.006, 0.018) 0.105
MAP2K1 1.344(1.042, 1.818) 0.328(0.197, 0.590) 0.799(0.471, 1.409) <0.001
AKT1 1.463(1.068, 1.726) 0.622(0.327, 0.913) 0.770(0.392, 1.128) <0.001
WASL 5.311(2.095, 12.438) 3.871(0.827, 8.914) 6.579(4.662, 9.306) 0.26
RAP1B 8.964(5.143, 11.848) 5.552 ± 3.902 7.473(4.315, 11.990) 0.057

In the comparisons of each two groups, it showed that ADCY2, MAP2K1 and AKT1’s methylation levels were significantly different between AD and control (Fig 1, p < 0.05). We found that ADCY2 methylation was significantly decreased in AD group, while MAP2K1 methylation and AKT1 methylation were significantly increased in AD group. Further subgroup analysis by carrying APOE ε4 allele showed that DNA methylation levels of MAP2K1 and AKT1 were both associated with AD independent of APOE ε4 (Fig 1B and 1C, p < 0.05). ADCY2 and MAP2K1’s methylation levels were significantly different between MCI and control, and both of them were decreased in MCI group (Fig 1A and 1C, p < 0.05). AKT1 and MAP2K1’s methylation levels were significantly different between AD and MCI, and both of them were increased in AD group (Fig 1B and 1C, p < 0.05). Therefore, MAP2K1 methylation was both significantly different in AD and MCI (Fig 1C, p < 0.05), while AKT1 methylation was only significantly different in AD (Fig 1B, p < 0.05). That meant AKT1 methylation was helpful to distinguish AD from MCI, and its association with AD was also independent of APOE ε4 allele.

Fig 1. Comparisons of ADCY2, AKT1 and MAP2K1’s DNA methylation levels between any two groups.

Fig 1

ε4 refers to subject carrying at least one APOE ε4 allele; non-ε4 refers to subject carrying no APOE ε4 allele.

The three AD-related genes’ expressions were validated in the normalized brain gene expression profile of AlzData (www.alzdata.org). It showed that ADCY2 didn’t have significantly different expressions in the brain between AD and normal people (Fig 2, p > 0.05), while AKT1 had significantly different expressions in Entorhinal Cortex and MAP2K1 had significantly different expressions in Entorhinal Cortex, Temporal Cortex, Hippocampus and Frontal Cortex in AD (Fig 2, p < 0.05).

Fig 2. Validation of the ADCY2, MAP2K1’s and AKT1 brain expression in AlzData (http://www.alzdata.org/index.html).

Fig 2

The AD-related and MCI-related genes were included in the logistic regression equation analysis, and it showed that AKT1 hypermethylation was an independent risk factor for AD, and MAP2K1 hypomethylation was an independent risk factor for MCI (Table 3, p < 0.05). Since DNA methylation is affected by environmental factors, in order to explore whether there are any related biochemical indicators affect their DNA methylation levels, we further analyzed correlations of AKT1 and MAP2K1’s methylation levels and serum biochemical indexes in AD and MCI respectively. We found that AKT1 hypermethylation was not associated with serum biochemical indicators in AD (S1 Fig, p > 0.05), and MAP2K1 hypomethylation was negatively correlated with serum TG levels in the MCI female group (S2 Fig, p = 0.0084, r = -0.58).

Table 3. The logistics regression of ADCY2, MAP2K1 and AKT1’s DNA methylation in AD and MCI respectively.

β Std. Error Wald p Exp(B) 95% CI
AD (Intercept) -0.276 1.062 0.068 0.795
ADCY2 -0.896 2.097 0.183 0.669 0.408 0.007–24.859
MAP2K1 0.081 0.332 0.059 0.808 1.084 0.565–2.081
AKT1 1.550 0.566 7.501 0.006 4.713 1.554–14.292
MCI (Intercept) 1.080 1.144 0.892 0.345
ADCY2 -1.810 1.505 1.446 0.229 0.164 0.009–3.128
MAP2K1 -4.560 0.903 25.474 0.000 0.010 0.002–0.061
AKT1 0.994 0.619 2.579 0.108 2.703 0.803–9.098

Discussion

Numerous studies have confirmed that neuroinflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AD [2124], and anti-neuroinflammation can reduce cognitive impairment in AD animal models [25] MCI is the preclinical stage of AD, and studies have found that the neuropathological changes of MCI partially overlap with those of AD, and neuroinflammatory lesions have gradually been confirmed to have formed in the MCI stage [11, 12]. This early inflammation promotes and exacerbates the production of Aβ and NFT, and further leads to neuronal toxicity and death [2628], which could make progress from MCI to AD.

Chemokine signaling pathway plays an important role in neuroinflammation, which is involved in signal transduction in astrocytes and microglia, and then participates in or directly leads to the occurrence of neuroinflammation, which leads to cognitive decline. As mentioned above, most current studies focus on TREM2-DAP12 and CX3Cl1-CX3CR1 axes. It has been found that the functional changes of the CX3CL1/CX3CR1 in different pathological conditions may promote the activation of microglia and stimulate the release of inflammatory factors [2931]. TREM2 gene acts downstream of CD33 and is involved in the regulation of Aβ pathology and neurodegeneration associated with AD risk [32]. However, there are few studies on other genes of this pathway and fewer studies on DNA methylation associated with AD and MCI. The seven genes selected in this study are all from chemokine signaling pathways and are directly or indirectly involved in neuroinflammation. However, there are still few studies on these genes, and the mechanism through which they act on neuroinflammatory response and the relationship between them are still to be explored.

Our results showed that the serum DNA methylation levels of three genes (ADCY2, MAP2K1 and AKT1) in the chemokine signaling pathway were correlated with AD, and expressions of MAP2K1 and AKT1 were both verified differently in the brain of AD, which could be used as serum candidate markers for AD. We found that the DNA methylation levels of AKT1 can be considered as one of the candidate markers to distinguish AD from MCI. Since carrying the APOE ε4 allele is an important risk factor for AD, we also conducted a further stratified analysis according to carry APOE ε4 whether or not. The results showed that AKT1 serum DNA hypermethylation was associated with AD independent of APOE ε4.

AKT1 encodes a serine/threonine kinase that is a central node in signaling pathways that regulate cell survival. Insufficient activity of the kinase Akt1 can lead to neuronal death, and it is one of the important proteins involved in the neuroinflammatory response of Alzheimer’s disease. Recent studies have shown that its neuroinflammation was regulated by microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, and controlled by interacting networks with other proteins [33]. AKT1 methylation has been found to promote AKT kinase activity, and its effect on the histone methyltransferase SETDB1 can cause tumorigenesis [34]. However, there have been no studies linking AKT1 methylation with neuroinflammation or cognitive dysfunction. The present study firstly found that its serum DNA methylation levels were significantly associated with AD independent of APOE ε4 and were differentially expressed in the Entorhinal Cortex of the brain in AD patients, but the sample size of this study is moderate and it needs to be verified in a large sample size.

Another finding of present study was that MAP2K1 methylation was significantly different both in AD and MCI, and it was differentially expressed in multiple regions of the brain in AD, including Entorhinal Cortex, Temporal Cortex, Hippocampus and Frontal Cortex. Although it couldn’t be used as a marker to distinguish AD from MCI, logistic regression showed that it was an independent risk factor for MCI, so it could be used as one of the serum candidate markers for MCI. The MAP2K1 gene encodes MAP2K1 protein, one of the signaling proteins of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) which regulated almost all stimulated cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and stress responses [35, 36]. Dysregulation of these kinases participated in many pathological process, including neurological diseases [37], such as Huntington’s disease, multiple sclerosis, ischemia and cerebral hypoxia. However, few studies have been conducted on its association with cognitive dysfunction. This study firstly found that its DNA methylation is significantly different in AD and MCI, which can be further verified in larger samples and functional experiments to clarify its role.

However, due to the impact of funds, sample storage and logistics during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study could not further determine the protein expression levels of AKT1 and MAP2K1 genes in blood, nor could it conduct a complete detection of chemokines in the chemokine signaling pathway in blood, so it could not fully explore their role and mechanism in the pathogenesis of AD or MCI, which were limitations of this study.

Conclusions

The present study found that the serum of AKT1 hypermethylation is related to AD independently of APOE ε4, which was differentially expressed in Entorhinal Cortex of the brain and was an independent risk factor for AD. It could be used as one of the candidate genes to distinguish AD and MCI. Serum of MAP2K1 hypomethylation is an independent risk factor for MCI and serum TG levels have negative correlation with it.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Correlation of AKT1 DNA methylation and biochemical criterion in AD.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Correlation of MAP2K1 DNA methylation and biochemical criterion in MCI.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Primer sequences for qMSP and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of APOE.

(DOCX)

S1 Data

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to staff who joined in the epidemiological survey in 2018 in Urumqi, Xinjiang province, China.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81360064), which had role in study design, data collection. the Key project of Xinjiang Natural Science Foundation (No. 2022D01D63), which had role in decision to publish. National Key research and development program (2016YFC1305900), which were in charge of preparation of the manuscript in the study.

References

  • 1.Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, Wahlund LO, et al. Mild cognitive impairment—beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004. 256: 240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR, Harvey D, DeCarli C. Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic- vs community-based cohorts. Arch Neurol. 2009. 66:1151–1157. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Petersen RC, Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Geda YE, Ivnik RJ, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Arch Neurol. 2009. 66:1447–1455. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martínez-Iglesias O, Carrera I, Carril JC, Fernández-Novoa L, Cacabelos N, Cacabelos R. DNA Methylation in Neurodegenerative and Cerebrovascular Disorders. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. 21:2220. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coppieters N, Dragunow M. Epigenetics in Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on DNA modifications. Curr Pharm Des. 2011. 17:3398–3412. doi: 10.2174/138161211798072544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Bergen JM, Li X, Hua J, Schreiner SJ, Steininger SC, Quevenco FC, et al. Colocalization of cerebral iron with Amyloid beta in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sci Rep. 2016. 6:35514. doi: 10.1038/srep35514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mancera-Páez O, Estrada-Orozco K, Mahecha MF, Cruz F, Bonilla-Vargas K, Sandoval N, et al. Differential Methylation in APOE (Chr19; Exon Four; from 44,909,188 to 44,909,373/hg38) and Increased Apolipoprotein E Plasma Levels in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. 20:1394. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pathak GA, Silzer TK, Sun J, Zhou Z, Daniel AA, Johnson L, et al. Genome-Wide Methylation of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Mexican Americans Highlights Genes Involved in Synaptic Transport, Alzheimer’s Disease-Precursor Phenotypes, and Metabolic Morbidities. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019. 72:733–749. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li QS, Vasanthakumar A, Davis JW, Idler KB, Nho K, Waring JF, et al. Association of peripheral blood DNA methylation level with Alzheimer’s disease progression. Clin Epigenetics. 2021.13:191. doi: 10.1186/s13148-021-01179-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Calsolaro V, Edison P. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: Current evidence and future directions. Alzheimers Dement. 2016. 12:719–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Knezevic D, Mizrahi R. Molecular imaging of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018. 80:123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bradburn S, Murgatroyd C, Ray N. Neuroinflammation in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2019. 50:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.González-Reyes RE, Nava-Mesa MO, Vargas-Sánchez K, Ariza-Salamanca D, Mora-Muñoz L. Involvement of Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease from a Neuroinflammatory and Oxidative Stress Perspective. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017. 10:427. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Finneran DJ, Nash KR. Neuroinflammation and fractalkine signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation. 2019. 16:30. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1412-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sung PS, Lin PY, Liu CH, Su HC, Tsai KJ. Neuroinflammation and Neurogenesis in Alzheimer’s Disease and Potential Therapeutic Approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 21:701. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mecca C, Giambanco I, Donato R, Arcuri C. Microglia and Aging: The Role of the TREM2-DAP12 and CX3CL1-CX3CR1 Axes. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. 19:318. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shen Y, Zhang Y, Du J, Jiang B, Shan T, Li H, et al. CXCR5 down-regulation alleviates cognitive dysfunction in a mouse model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy: potential role of microglial autophagy and the p38MAPK/NF-κB/STAT3 signaling pathway. J Neuroinflammation. 2021. 18:246. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02300-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gmitrowicz A, Kucharska A. (1994). Developmental disorders in the fourth edition of the American classification: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM IV—optional book). Psychiatr Pol 28:509–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu M, Zhang DF, Luo R, Wu Y, Zhou H, Kong LL, et al. A systematic integrated analysis of brain expression profiles reveals YAP1 and other prioritized hub genes as important upstream regulators in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. (2018). 14:215–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.08.012 Epub 2017 Sep 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang DF, Fan Y, Xu M, Wang G, Wang D, Li J, et al. Complement C7 is a novel risk gene for Alzheimer’s disease in Han Chinese. Natl Sci Rev. 2019. 6:257–274. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eikelenboom P, Bate C, Van Gool WA, Hoozemans JJM, Rozemuller JM, Veerhuis R, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease and prion disease. Glia. 2002. 40:232–239. doi: 10.1002/glia.10146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hensley K. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: mechanisms, pathologic consequences, and potential for therapeutic manipulation. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010. 21:1–14. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cai Z, Hussain MD, Yan LJ. Microglia, neuroinflammation, and beta-amyloid protein in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Neurosci. 2014. 124:307–321. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2013.833510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Rev Neurol. 2021. 17:157–172. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-00435-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cai M, Lee JH, Yang EJ. Electroacupuncture attenuates cognition impairment via anti-neuroinflammation in an Alzheimer’s disease animal model. J Neuroinflammation. 2019. 16:264. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1665-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Veerhuis R, Van Breemen MJ, Hoozemans JM, Morbin M, Ouladhadj J, Tagliavini F, et al. Amyloid beta plaque-associated proteins C1q and SAP enhance the Abeta1-42 peptide-induced cytokine secretion by adult human microglia in vitro. Acta Neuropathol. 2003. 105:135–144. doi: 10.1007/s00401-002-0624-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hoozemans JJ, Veerhuis R, Rozemuller JM, Eikelenboom P. Neuroinflammation and regeneration in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2006. 24:157–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2005.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garwood CJ, Pooler AM, Atherton J, Hanger DP, Noble W. Astrocytes are important mediators of Aβ-induced neurotoxicity and tau phosphorylation in primary culture. Cell Death Dis. 2011. 2:e167. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prinz M, Priller J. Tickets to the brain: role of CCR2 and CX3CR1 in myeloid cell entry in the CNS. J Neuroimmunol. 2010. 224:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mattison HA, Nie H, Gao H, Zhou H, Hong JS, Zhang J. Suppressed pro-inflammatory response of microglia in CX3CR1 knockout mice. J Neuroimmunol. 2013. 257:110–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pawelec P, Ziemka-Nalecz M, Sypecka J, Zalewska T. The Impact of the CX3CL1/CX3CR1 Axis in Neurological Disorders. Cells. 2020. doi: 10.3390/cells9102277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Griciuc A, Patel S, Federico AN, Choi SH, Innes BJ, Oram MK, et al. TREM2 Acts Downstream of CD33 in Modulating Microglial Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron. 2019. 103:820–835.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.El Idrissi F, Gressier B, Devos D, Belarbi K. A Computational Exploration of the Molecular Network Associated to Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Pharmacol. 2021. 12:630003. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.630003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guo J, Dai X, Laurent B, Zheng N, Gan W, Zhang J, et al. AKT methylation by SETDB1 promotes AKT kinase activity and oncogenic functions. Nat Cell Biol. 2019. 21:226–237. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0261-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Keshet Y, Seger R. The MAP kinase signaling cascades: a system of hundreds of components regulates a diverse array of physiological functions. Methods Mol Biol. (2010). 661:3–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-795-2_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Flores K, Yadav SS, Katz AA, Seger R. The Nuclear Translocation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases: Molecular Mechanisms and Use as Novel Therapeutic Target. Neuroendocrinology. 2019. 108:121–131. doi: 10.1159/000494085 Epub 2018 Sep 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Collins LM, Downer EJ, Toulouse A, Nolan YM. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase (MKP)-1 in Nervous System Development and Disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2015. 51:1158–1167. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-8786-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Masaki Mogi

7 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-21380Associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zou,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

This paper in its present form does not reach enough level for acceptance in the Journal.  Major revisions are needed according to the Reviewers' comments.  Respond to them appropriately.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 21 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Masaki Mogi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"This research was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81360064), the Key project of Xinjiang Natural Science Foundation (No. 2022D01D63), National Key research and development program (2016YFC1305900)"

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript entitled “Associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD),” the authors investigated the change of DNA methylation levels in the serum of MCI and AD patients. The subject of this study is interesting; however, several concerns were raised as follows:

Major comments:

1. In the introduction, the authors did not summarize the previous research precisely. The authors should mention previous studies and describe the significance of the subject of this study clearly.

2. The authors determined the DNA methylation levels of the seven genes; however, their logic and bases were unclear. The authors should describe it clearly. In addition, did these protein levels change in the blood of MCI and AD patients? Were these changes related to the pathogenesis of these diseases? What’s the specificity?

3. The authors identified significant difference of ADCY2, MAP2K1 and AKT1’s DNA methylation levels. Were these levels related to the seriousness or score of MCI and AD patients? How about the duration of these diseases?

4. In the title of this manuscript, “chemokine signaling pathway” was described. Were chemokines changed in the MCI and AD patients of the present study? Was the change in ADCY2, MAP2K1, and AKT1’s DNA methylation levels related to these cytokines?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Dec 1;18(12):e0295320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295320.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Oct 2023

DearReviewers:

Thank you for your letter and for the comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)”. (ID: PONE-D-23-21380). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope meet with approval. Revised portions are marked with highlights in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments were written on the letter of Response to reviewers. We look forward to your attention.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Masaki Mogi

20 Nov 2023

Associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)

PONE-D-23-21380R1

Dear Dr. Zou,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Masaki Mogi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I am fully satisfied with the response of the authors. Therefore, I would like to recommend the publication of this manuscript.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Masaki Mogi

23 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-21380R1

Associations of serum DNA methylation levels of chemokine signaling pathway genes with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)

Dear Dr. Zou:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Masaki Mogi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Correlation of AKT1 DNA methylation and biochemical criterion in AD.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Correlation of MAP2K1 DNA methylation and biochemical criterion in MCI.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Primer sequences for qMSP and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of APOE.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES