Skip to main content
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B logoLink to Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B
. 2023 Aug 25;13(12):4856–4874. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.08.023

Immunogenicity of mucosal COVID-19 vaccine candidates based on the highly attenuated vesicular stomatitis virus vector (VSVMT) in golden syrian hamster

Yong Ke a,, En Zhang b,c,, Jianming Guo b,c, Xiaoxiao Zhang b,c, Lei Wang a, Duo Chen b,c, Xinkui Fang b, Jianwei Zhu a, Feng Li d,, Tao Sun b,c,, Baohong Zhang a,
PMCID: PMC10692390  PMID: 38045049

Abstract

COVID-19 is caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Current systemic vaccines generally provide limited protection against viral replication and shedding within the airway. Recombinant VSV (rVSV) is an effective vector which inducing potent and comprehensive immunities. Currently, there are two clinical trials investigating COVID-19 vaccines based on VSV vectors. These vaccines were developed with spike protein of WA1 which administrated intramuscularly. Although intranasal route is ideal for activating mucosal immunity with VSV vector, safety is of concern. Thus, a highly attenuated rVSV with three amino acids mutations in matrix protein (VSVMT) was developed to construct safe mucosal vaccines against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. It demonstrated that spike protein mutant lacking 21 amino acids in its cytoplasmic domain could rescue rVSV efficiently. VSVMT indicated improved safeness compared with wild-type VSV as the vector encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. With a single-dosed intranasal inoculation of rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21, potent SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralization antibodies could be stimulated in animals, particularly in term of mucosal and cellular immunity. Strikingly, the chimeric VSV encoding SΔ21 of Delta-variant can induce more potent immune responses compared with those encoding SΔ21 of Omicron- or WA1-strain. VSVMT is a promising platform to develop a mucosal vaccine for countering COVID-19.

Key words: COVID-19, Vesicular stomatitis virus, Matrix protein mutant, Mucosal Vaccine, Spike protein, Variants of concerns, Intranasal inoculation, Cellular immunity

Graphical abstract

Attenuated VSVMT-based vaccines successfully induce fast, endurable humoral and cellular immune responses in hamsters and hACE2-mouse, thus serving as promising candidates to develop next-generation mucosal vaccines against COVID-19.

Image 1

1. Introduction

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, it has resulted in the loss of over 6 million people1. The COVID-19 pandemic is caused by SARS-CoV-2, a human coronavirus that primarily infects and transmits through the respiratory tract. SARS-CoV-2 gains enter into host cells by utilizing angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) as the receptor2,3. Its spike protein is in charge of the attachment with ACE2, triggering the production of neutralizing protective antibodies, and is considered to be the primary antigens for current vaccine development4,5.

Vaccines have proved to be the most effective method for controlling the epidemic of COVID-19. Varieties of platforms have been utilized to deliver the S protein of parental strain, including inactivated virion, lipid nanoparticle encapsulated mRNA and viral-vectored vaccines6, 7, 8, 9. To date, the emergence of at least five variants of concerns (VOCs), particularly the Delta and Omicron, has raised significant attention due to their virulence and transmissibility10. Of note, both have the ability to evade the protection provided by current vaccines11,12. In addition to the challenge of existing vaccines due to emerging VOCs, their inability to effectively elicit mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection may also be another key reason11,13. Systemic respiratory vaccines typically provide limited protection against SARS-CoV-2, which requires a local mucosal secretory IgA response within the airway14.

Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has emerged as a distinguished vaccine vector against microbial pathogens. The advantages of recombinant VSV (rVSV) lie in its robust growth in approved mammalian cell lines and its capability to elicit potent cellular and humoral immune responses15. In 2019, a VSV-based vaccine (known as Ervebo) against Ebola Virus has been approved by FDA16. Currently, there have been at least two clinical trials involved in the evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines developed with VSV vector17,18. Of note, there is currently no available report regarding VSV-based vaccine candidates specifically targeting the Delta and Omicron variants. VSV vector-based vaccine delivered by nasal route is ideal for immunization. However, the main obstacle to its application is the concern of safety, such as potential neurotoxicity19, 20, 21. Previously, a mutant VSV(VSVMT) with triple mutations (S226R, V221F, and ΔM51) occurring at its matrix protein (M) was constructed by the lab, which demonstrated a significant attenuation compared to wild-type VSV and VSVΔM51 with a single amino acid deletion in M protein. The attenuation of VSVMT lies in its significantly diminished ability to inhibit type I interferon signaling and host gene expression22. In our study, S protein mutant of SARS-CoV-2 with 21 amino acids deleted in the cytoplasmic domain (SΔ21) was capable of incorporating into VSV particles with high efficiency. Thus, we rescued a series of chimeric rVSVMT encoding SΔ21 mutant of the parental strain of WA1, Delta, and Omicron variants, with VSV glycop-rotein (G) deleted. Their immunogenicity was evaluated and compared in the animal model, including the golden syrian hamster and hACE2 mouse, via mucosal routes of intranasal (IN) and per oral (PO) administration. Importantly, SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral, mucosal as well as T cell-mediated immune responses can be effectively and comprehensively stimulated with one shot of the intranasal administration. Strikingly, the candidate vaccine encoding Delta strain S protein exhibited more efficient replication in vitro and stimulate more potent immune responses in vivo, particularly when administered via the intranasal route. The study demonstrated that VSVMT encoding Spike protein can induce potent immune responses in vivo. Therefore, VSVMT can be the promising platform to develop novel mucosal vaccines for countering COVID-19.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cell lines and viruses

Huh-7 cells (NIBIO, China), baby hamster kidney cells (BHK-21) (ATCC) and African green monkey cells (VeroE6) (ATCC) were cultured in 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) DMEM medium. Cells were grown in 5% CO2 37 °C humidified air. Replication of incompetent virus G-rVSVΔG-GFP was made and kept in the lab.

2.2. Plasmid construction

To characterize the optimal cytoplasmic tail of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for constructing retargeting VSV virus, we initially constructed plasmids encoding the spike protein gene as well as its mutants with sequential deletions of carboxyl-terminal amino acids. The human codon-optimized sequences of the S protein gene of prototype-WA1 and VOCs (Delta and Omicron) were utilized (GenBank: ON872488.1, MW408785.1, and OW996240.1). SFL, SΔ19, SΔ20, SΔ21, SΔ22, SΔ23, SΔ24, SΔ25 and SΔ26 represented the full-length Spike protein or Spike corresponding mutants with 19–26 amino acids truncated from the cytoplasmic tail. The PCR primers were shown in Supporting Information Table S1. The mutated genes were inserted into the eukaryotic expression plasmid pIRES. These plasmids were named pIRES-SΔ19–26 or -SFL (Table S1).

2.3. Flow cytometry

HEK293T cells were transfected with pIRES-SΔ19–26 or -SFL through Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher). After 24 h, the transfected cells were assessed with rabbit anti-spike protein polyclonal Ab (Sino Biological). After incubation for 30 min, the cells were washed with DPBS, and stained with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488. S protein expression levels were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD).

2.4. Recovery of replication-defective spike-rVSVΔG-GFP

The replication-incompetent VSV particles pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein mutants were constructed as described previously23. Briefly, the recombinant plasmids pIRES-SFL or pIRES-SΔ19–SΔ26 were transfected into HEK293T cells, with transfection occurring 24 h prior to infection with G-rVSVΔG-GFP at a MOI of 1. After 24 h, the pseudotyped VSV particles, namely SFL-rVSVΔG-GFP or SΔ19–26-rVSVΔG-GFP, were harvested from the cell culture supernatants and subsequently used to infect hACE2-293T cells. The number of infected cells was quantified, enabling the determination of the infective units (IU) of the VSV pseudotypes.

2.5. Recovery of replication-competent chimeric rVSV encoding spike protein

A mutated spike protein gene with optimal cytoplasmic tail (SΔ21) was cloned between MluI and XhoI restriction sites of pVSVMT-GFP or pVSV-GFP plasmid to replace the G protein gene of VSV. The above plasmids were constructed and kept in the lab. The recovery of the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 (WA1, Delta, and Omicron) or rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses was carried out by Fang et al.22. Briefly, BHK21 cells were infected with recombinant vaccinia virus (vTF7-3) for an hour. Subsequently, these cells were co-transfected with plasmid pVSVΔGMT-SΔ21-GFP or pVSVΔG-SΔ21-GFP together with four helper plasmids (pBS-G, L, P, and N). After 48 h, the culture supernatants were collected, filtered through the 0.2 μm membrane and used to infect BHK21. The cells were observed daily until the typical cytopathic effect (CPE) appeared, and the culture supernatants were collected. The rescued viruses were initially amplified in BHK-21 cells transfected with pMD2G plasmid. Subsequently, the rVSVs were plaque-purified and expanded in Vero E6 cells.

2.6. Virion ultracentrifugation purification and negative staining

The chimeric VSVs expressing SARS-CoV2 spike protein were amplified in VeroE6 cells. The supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 780 × g for 30 min to remove debris and then the supernatants were filtered with a 0.45 μm filter. Samples were ultracentrifuged through a 20% (w/w) sucrose cushion at 90,000 × g for 1.5 h at 4 °C. The pelleted virions were then resuspended in DPBS and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by a silver staining kit (Beyotime).

Negative staining was performed to observe the intact morphology of the ultracentrifugation-purified rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions. Briefly, virions were adsorbed to Formvar-coated copper mesh grids, negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid solution and air dried. Digital images of virions were captured with an electron microscope (HITACHI 7800).

2.7. Genetic stability of M gene in VSVMT vector

The M gene with triple mutations plays a key role in the attenuation of the VSVMT vector. As the classical protocol to study the genetic stability of the viral vector, analysis including viral stock passaging, plaques purification, gene amplification as well as sequencing were performed as described24. In short, the Master Seed Viruses (MSV) of each rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 was serially passaged for up to 10 passages in the VeroE6 production cell line. Virus infection was conducted using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01, and the infected cells were incubated for 2 days. Afterward, the virus-containing supernatant was harvested and frozen at −80 °C for the next passaging round. The 5th and 10th passages for each virus were plaque purified. At least 10 viral plaques were randomly selected from each stock24. Viral RNA was extracted and the M protein gene was amplified after reverse transcription and sequenced. VSV-M gene PCR primers are as follows, forward: 5′-agaaattagggatcgcacca-3′; reverse: 5′-ctccagatgcctttttctcg-3′.

2.8. Neutralization assay

Sera from the experimental animals were heat-treated at 56 °C for half an hour before antibody detection, and then serially diluted at a two-fold starting at 1:10 with DMEM. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was also serially diluted two-fold starting at 1:2. To determine neutralizing antibody titers, 50 μL of the diluted sera or BALF samples were mixed with 50 μL DMEM containing 100 PFU of the corresponding VSVΔGMT-SΔ21-GFP virus encoding SΔ21 of WA1, Delta or Omicron, respectively. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, then added to VeroE6 cells cultured in 96-well plates. One hour later, the cells were rinsed three times with DPBS and supplemented with DMEM media containing 2% FBS. At 24 h post-inoculation (h.p.i), the neutralization titers were calculated by observation under a fluorescence microscope. The titers were recorded as the reciprocal of the highest antibody dilution, which gave a 100% inhibition of the cytopathic effect25,26. The neutralization curves are fitted by four-parameter nonlinear regression using GraphPad Prism 8.

Dilutions of the purified monoclonal antibodies 2G1, REGN10987, and 8G3 were pre-incubated with Spike-rVSVΔG-GFP pseudotyped with WA1, Delta or Omicron S protein for 1 h at 37 °C and then infected hACE2-293T cells. IC50 values of the antibodies were calculated as the reciprocal of their dilution fold, which caused a 50% reduction of the GFP-positive cells at 24 h.p.i..

2.9. ELISPOT assay

Splenectomies were performed on human ACE2 transgenic mice that were immunized with various rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses. The mice were sacrificed at 0, 7 or 14 days post-immunization. After anesthesia, the whole spleen tissue was taken from mice, washed with sterile PBS, and then finely minced with sterile scissors. After homogenization, splenocytes were transferred to 50-mL conical tubes and centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min. The pellets were resuspended in PBS. The cell suspension was poured through a sterile cell container with a 40 μm pore diameter to remove any large debris. Murine lymphocytes were isolated following the manufacturer's protocol (Solarbio). The isolated cells were then resuspended in 1 mL RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS and counted. The ELISPOT analysis was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol (Mabtech). Briefly, harvested cells from each mouse were seeded in triplicate at 3 × 105/well into 96-well plates precoated with IFN-γ mAb. Cells were pulsed with a 2 μg/mL peptide pool of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein PP003 (SinoBiological) at 37 °C in the CO2 incubator. In addition, cells were plated as mock (nonpulsed) controls for each mouse group. After 20 h of incubation, the cell medium was removed, and plates were washed extensively with PBS-0.5% FCS. Subsequently, each well was treated with 0.5 μg/mL of biotin-labeled anti-IFN-γ mAb. Following a 90-min incubation at room temperature and additional washes in PBS-0.5% FCS, 100 μL of 0.2 μg/mL streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase was added to each well. The wells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature and washed. The ready-to-use substrate solution (BCIP/NBT-plus) was added at 100 μL/well. After spot development, the plates were washed extensively with tap water. The plates were dried, and spots were quantified. The number of background ELISPOTS from mock wells were subtracted from the experimental groups. The results are presented as mean ELISPOTS per million cells ± standard deviations for each group (n = 3).

2.10. Real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from homogenized animal tissues according to the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Fisher). Briefly, 750 μL Trizol reagent was mixed with 250 μL supernatants from the homogenized tissues. After incubation for 5 min, 200 μL trichloromethane was added to the mixture and vortexed for 15 s. The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 11,000 × g, and 300 μL supernatants were collected and mixed with 300 μL isopropanol. The mixture was kept under −20 °C for 2 h. After centrifuging for 15 min at 11,000 × g, the pellet was washed with 75% ethyl alcohol. After centrifugation, the RNA was dissolved in DEPC-treated water. Viral cDNA was reverse transcribed using the First Strand RevertAid cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher). Real-time q-PCR was conducted with Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR SYBR Green II Kit (Accurate Biology). The primers used to detect VSV-N gene were as follows: forward: 5′-TGATCGACTTTGGATTGTCTTCTAA-3′, reverse: 5′-TCTGGTGGATCTGAGCAGAAGAG-3′.

2.11. Western blotting

VeroE6 was infected with various rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses at MOI of 1. At 24 h.p.i., the cell lysates were prepared using 5 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer with 1% PMSF and then centrifuged at 15,700 × g at 4 °C for 15 min. Cellular lysates were separated at 110 V for about 1 h and then transferred onto the PVDF membrane. Rabbit anti-spike antibody (SinoBiological) or mouse VSV convalescent serum were incubated with the PVDF membrane at 4 °C for 12 h. After three washes, goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG antibodies which were conjugated with HPR were incubated with the PVDF membrane at room temperature for 1 h. After washing with PBST three times, the bands on the PVDF membrane were identified with ECL reagent.

2.12. One-step growth curve

One-step growth curves were established in VeroE6 cells. Briefly, various rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses were inoculated into VeroE6 at an MOI of 3 and cultured in 12-well plates. The inoculum was removed and the cells were washed with DPBS after 1 h, followed by the addition of 2% fetal bovine serum DMEM media to the cells. Triplicate samples were collected at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h.p.i., respectively, with viral titers identified by plaque-assays.

2.13. Animal experiments

Specific-pathogen-free (SPF) female LVG golden syrian hamsters (∼90 g) from Charles Rivers company were used to assess the safety of VSVMT in contrast to wild-type VSV as the vector encoding spike protein. As shown in Table 1, hamsters were randomly felled into 5 groups of three animals each: hamsters were inoculated with 5 × 105 or 5 × 106 PFU rVSVΔGMT-Delta or rVSVΔG-Delta via IN route in 50 μL PBS, with PBS as the control. Blood specimens were gathered on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-inoculation. On Day 28, the animals were euthanized, and their organs including spleen, lung, and testis were collected. In addition, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected through 1 mL PBS. All samples were stored at −80 °C.

Table 1.

Animal experimental design of safety evaluation on hamster vaccinated by VSVMT-Delta and VSV-Delta.

Animal Inoculum Routea Immunization dose
LVG Golden Syrian Hamster VSVMT-Delta IN 5 × 106 PFU
VSVMT-Delta IN 5 × 105 PFU
VSVΔG-Delta IN 5 × 106 PFU
VSVΔG-Delta IN 5 × 105 PFU
PBS IN /
a

IN, intranasal inoculation. /, not applicable.

Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine candidates developed with live rVSVMT as the vector was evaluated in two different animal models, which were golden syrian hamsters and human ACE2 transgenic mice. As shown in Table 2, 21 groups of specific-pathogen-free (SPF) female LVG golden syrian hamsters were inoculated with 105 or 106 PFU rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 via the IN, IM, and PO route in 50 μL PBS, with the PBS as control. Sera specimens were gathered on Days 7 and 28 post-vaccination. The animals were euthanized on Day 28; organs including the lung and brain were gathered followed by the store at −80 °C; bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected through 1 mL PBS and stored at −80 °C for subsequent tests.

Table 2.

Animal experimental design of immunology evaluation on hamster and hACE2-mouse vaccinated by rVSVMT-SΔ21.

Animal Inoculum Route Immunization dose
LVG golden Syrian hamster VSVMT-WA1 IMa/INb/POc 105 PFU
VSVMT-Delta IM/IN/PO 105 PFU
VSVMT-Omicron IM/IN/PO 105 PFU
VSVMT-WA1 IM/IN/PO 106 PFU
VSVMT-Delta IM/IN/PO 106 PFU
VSVMT-Omicron IM/IN/PO 106 PFU
PBS IM/IN/PO /
hACE2-mouse VSVMT-WA1 IM/IN/PO 106 PFU
VSVMT-Delta IM/IN/PO 106 PFU
VSVMT-Omicron IM/IN/PO 106 PFU
PBS IM/IN/PO /

/, not applicable.

a

IM, intramuscular injection.

b

IN, intranasal inoculation.

c

PO, Per os route inoculation.

Human ACE2 transgenic mice were made by microinjection of DNA into zygotic pronuclei. As shown in Table 2, the transgenic mice were randomly divided into 12 groups of three animals: hACE2-mouse were inoculated with 106 PFU rVSVMT-SΔ21 via the IN, IM, and PO route in 50 μL PBS. All animals were inoculated on Day 0. Blood specimens were collected on Days 0, 7, and 28 until post-vaccination. The animals were euthanized on Day 28, and organs of the lungs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were gathered in 1 mL PBS.

To test the cellular immunity induced by various VSVΔGMT-SΔ21 via mucosal route, hACE2 mice were grouped as shown in Table 3, which were vaccinated with 105 or 106 PFU per animal of VSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses in PBS or with PBS alone intranasally. At 0, 7, and 28 days postimmunization, mice were sacrificed with their spleens removed to perform ELISPOT assays.

Table 3.

Animal experimental design of cellular immunity on hACE2 transgenic mice vaccinated by various rVSVMT-SΔ21 viruses.

Animal Inoculum Routesa Immunization dose
hACE2 transgenic mice VSVMT-WA1 IN 106 PFU
VSVMT-WA1 IN 105 PFU
VSVMT-Delta IN 106 PFU
VSVMT-Delta IN 105 PFU
VSVMT-Omicron IN 106 PFU
VSVMT-Omicron IN 105 PFU
VSVMT-GFP IN 106 PFU
VSVMT-GFP IN 105 PFU
PBS IN /
a

IN, intranasal inoculation. /, not applicable.

All animal experiments were executed based on SHVRI (Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute) (SV-20211217-04) and SJTU (Shanghai JiaoTong University) ethical guidelines; All animals were identified as negative through serum neutralizing assay before study initiation.

2.14. Hematology, liver function, and renal function

The following indicators regarding animal hematology were examined in the study, including platelet (PLT), haemoglobin concentration (HGB), white blood cell-middle cell count (W-MCC), haematocrit neutrophil (HCT), white blood cell-large cell count (W-LCC), the total white blood cell (WBC), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red blood cells (RBC), white blood cell-small cell count (W-SCC), white blood cell-small cell ratio (W-SCR), red blood cell distribution width coefficient of variation (RDW-CV), white blood cell-middle cell ratio (W-MCR), white blood cell-large cell ratio (W-LCR) and red blood cell distribution width standard deviation (RDW-SD). The EDTA blood was collected and detected with the pocH-100iV Diff analyzer (Sysme).

Indicators associated with animal liver and renal function were also detected, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total-protein (TP, including albumin and globulin), gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin (ALB), carbamide (UREA), uric acid (UA) and creatinine (CREA). The indicators were determined from serum with an automatic biochemical analyzer (Mindray BS360-S).

2.15. Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 8 and SPSS18 were used to analyze the data. An unpaired two-tailed t-test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Two-way ANOVA statistical analyses among multiple groups were conducted. The value of P < 0.05 was credited with statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Optimizing cytoplasmic tail of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for construction of retargeting VSVMT chimera virus

SARS-CoV-2 S protein consists of the ectodomain, transmembrane and cytoplasmic tail (CT). It forms a homotrimer on the virion, and play a crucial role in mediating the virus's entry into human cells by binding to the cell-surface receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The CT domain of Spike protein is highly conserved among all the variants, whereas considerable mutations exist within the ectodomain among variants of concerns (VOCs) which leads to changes in protein conformation (Fig. 1A). Notably, there are ∼30 AA mutations occurring at the S protein ectodomain of Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) in comparison to that of classical WA1 strain, resulting in vaccine breakthrough.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characterization of the optimal cytoplasmic tail of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for construction of retargeting VSVMT chimera virus. Single-cycle VSVS were pseudotyped with S mutants with different cytoplasmic tail lengths and were compared for their ability to mediate infection of ACE2-293T. (A) The spike protein conformations of WA1, Delta, and Omicron Variants. (B) SARS-CoV-2 S protein mutants with different cytoplasmic tail (CT) lengths. SFL, SΔ26, SΔ25, SΔ24, SΔ23, SΔ22, SΔ21, SΔ20, and SΔ19 represent the full-length S protein or the S mutants with CTs truncated from 26 to 19 amino acids, respectively. The remaining CT regions are shown in red. SS, signal peptide sequence; ET, ectodomain; TM, transmembrane domain; CT, cytoplasmic tail. (C) Surface expression of S protein, S deletion mutants. At 24 h post-transfection, cells were subjected to a flow cytometry assay. (D) Intact antigenicity of the SΔ21 encoded by VSV vector. Binding activities of replication-defective VSVΔG-GFP pseudotyped with SΔ21 were detected with neutralizing mAbs recognizing S protein, with the 2G1 against WA1 strain, REGN10987 or 8G3 recognizing Delta or Omicron variants, respectively. IC50 of the above mAbs against different VSV pseudotypes were calculated. Data are shown as mean ± SD with three replicates. ns means P > 0.05. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

The truncated tail of the coronavirus S protein can play a significant role in S protein incorporation efficiency into the VSV envelope membrane27. The CT domain of spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 consists of 26 amino acids. Serial passaging of a cell-adapted rVSVΔG-S demonstrated 19 or 21 amino acids truncation existed at the S protein cytoplasmic tail28. In our study, a strategy based on pseudotype entry assays of G-rVSVΔG-GFP was set up to evaluate the efficiency of S with serially deleted cytoplasmic tail in rescuing retargeting VSVMT chimera virus. With 19–26 amino acids of its carboxyl-terminal serially deleted (Fig. 1B), the mutant S genes of the SARS-CoV-2 WA1 strain were cloned into expression vector pIRES respectively. The resulting plasmids were designated as pIRES-SΔ19, -SΔ20, -SΔ21, -SΔ22, -SΔ23, -SΔ24, -SΔ25, or -SΔ26. Initially, the expression of these S mutants on the surface of transfected 293T cells was detected with flow cytometry assay and then normalized to a comparable level by adjusting the concentration of the transfected plasmid (Fig. 1C). A series of replication-defective pseudotype VSVs were generated through transduction with G-VSVΔG-GFP at MOI of 1 as described23, which were SΔ19–SΔ26-VSVΔG-GFP, respectively.

The efficiency of the above S mutants packaging into the VSV envelope membrane was determined by counting the number of infected cells. Infective units (IU) of the VSV pseudotypes were determined and compared. As shown in Table 4, it was observed that the truncation of the S protein cytoplasmic tail could led to increased infectivity in comparison to full-length S (SFL). The IU of VSV pseudotypes with SΔ21 of WA1, Delta, and Omicron strains in hACE2-293T cells were 45.4 ± 5.72, 54.49 ± 10.22 or 48.42 ± 6.92, respectively. These were significantly higher than other S truncated mutants, such as SΔ24 as well as the full-length S (SFL). As a result, it suggested that with 21 amino acids at the carboxyl-terminal deleted, the mutant S protein (SΔ21) can incorporate into VSV particles most efficiently.

Table 4.

Infectivity units of non-replicating VSV ( × 103 IU/mL).

Truncated Spike proteins WA1-VSVΔG-GFP Delta-VSVΔG-GFP Omicron -VSVΔG-GFP
Spike-FL 0.12 ± 0.09 0.12 ± 0.08 0.1 ± 0.06
SpikeΔCT19 29.42 ± 4.21 28.62 ± 6.51 25.62 ± 3.89
SpikeΔCT20 33.87 ± 5.34 30.90 ± 4.58 36.64 ± 3.50
SpikeΔCT21 45.4 ± 5.72 54.49 ± 10.22 48.42 ± 6.92
SpikeΔCT22 28.29 ± 4.58 42.06 ± 7.56 36.88 ± 5.31
SpikeΔCT23 34.47 ± 6.10 44.83 ± 7.65 31.37 ± 5.57
SpikeΔCT24 19.41 ± 3.46 25.26 ± 5.28 21.35 ± 4.51
SpikeΔCT25 11.16 ± 3.04 15.69 ± 4.80 10.75 ± 2.82
SpikeΔCT26 9.64 ± 3.46 8.29 ± 3.59 7.18 ± 2.37

Infectivity units were determined by counting GFP-expressing cells. Virus detections were repeated 5 times.

To evaluate the intact antigenicity of the S mutant (SΔ21) encoded by the VSV vector, recognition activities of SΔ21 with hACE2 were characterized with specific neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Among them, 2G1 was the one recognizing WA1 strain epitope, whereas the REGN10987 or 8G3 NAbs recognize epitopes of Delta or Omicron strains and potently inhibit their infection respectively29, 30, 31. The IC50 of these antibodies was calculated using SΔ21-rVSVΔG-GFP. Dilutions of the purified antibodies, 2G1, REGN10987, or 8G3, were pre-incubated with WA1, Delta, or Omicron SΔ21 protein pseudotyped VSV (SΔ21-rVSVΔG-GFP) for 1 h at 37 °C and then infected hACE2-293T cells. As shown in Fig. 1D, the IC50 of 2G1 blocking of SΔ21-rVSVΔG-GFP of WA1 was 0.0056 μg/mL, and those against Delta or Omicron SΔ21 pseudotyped viruses were 0.0066 μg/mL or 0.01472, respectively. The IC50 of REGN10987 blocking of SΔ21-rVSVΔG-GFP of Delta was 0.00091 μg/mL, whereas it’s blocking those of WA1 or Omicron were 0.05581 or 0.07168 μg/mL respectively. In addition, IC50 of 8G3 blocking of SΔ21-rVSVΔG-GFP of Omicron was 0.01001 μg/mL, whereas the values of WA1 or Omicron were 0.13609 or 0.029061 μg/mL, respectively. Thus, it indicated that the truncation of 21 AA in the S protein intracellular domain has not affected its recognition activities by the corresponding neutralizing antibodies. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the S mutant (SΔ21) expressed by the VSV vector retains its immunogenicity and could be dubbed as an authentic surrogate of SARS-CoV-2.

3.2. Characterization of retargeting VSVMT expressing truncated S protein of SARS-CoV-2 and its dominant VOCs

There are two strategies to construct retargeting rVSV with its G protein replaced by foreign proteins, which are replication-competent or incompetent23,32. In contrast to the replication-incompetent pseudotyped virus, replication-competent rVSVs encoding SARS-CoV-2 S protein can propagate in the host, which consequently stimulates more potent immunities. Based on above study, 21 AA truncated S protein (SΔ21) has been identified as capable of incorporation into the VSV envelope efficiently not only for WA1 but also for the Delta and Omicron B1.1.529 variants. Thus, replication-competent rVSVs with its G replaced with SΔ21 was rescued for the live vaccine candidates.

The recovery of rVSVs was performed as described in “Methods”. Highly attenuated rVSVs, namely rVSVΔGMT-WA1-SΔ21-GFP (VSVMT-WA1), rVSVΔGMT-Delta-SΔ21-GFP (VSVMT-Delta) and rVSVΔGMT-Omicron-SΔ21-GFP (VSVMT-Omicron), were successfully rescued (Fig. 2A). Individual plaques were isolated and the potentially retargeting rVSVs were propagated and characterized with Western blotting. Cell lysates were collected and identified with both S protein-specific antibodies as well as VSV convalescent sera from infected mice. With S protein-specific antibody, the expected-sized band of ∼200 kD was detected in VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta and VSVMT-Omicron infected VeroE6 cells (Fig. 2B), whereas the corresponding band was not detected in wild-type VSV (VSV-GFP) infected cells. With VSV-infected mouse convalescent sera as the primary antibody, VSV structural G protein was not identified in the retargeting rVSVs infected VeroE6 cells, whereas N/P protein was detected. In the VSV-GFP control group, the VSV structural protein G and the N/P were all detected (Fig. 2C). These results indicated that the G protein was successfully replaced by SΔ21 in the retargeted rVSVs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Generation of retargeting VSVMT encoding S protein of various strains. (A) Diagram of retargeting VSVMT construct. Wild-type VSV has no S gene insertion; rVSVMT-SΔ21 encodes for SARS-CoV-2 S mutants of various strains with their genome. The parental VSVMT genome encodes the nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), glycoprotein (G), RNA polymerase (L), and mutant M protein (MT) that harbors three mutations (ΔM51, V221F, and S226R). The gene for the truncated S protein of WA1, variants of Delta or Omicron (SΔCT21) were used to replace the G gene of the VSV through Mlu I and XhoI enzyme digestion, eGFP gene was cloned into the sites with XhoI and NheI enzyme digestion. (B, C) Western blotting of rescued rVSVMT-SΔ21 chimera viruses. (B) S protein was detected using a specific antibody; (C) with VSV convalescent sera. The viruses were passaged in VeroE6 cells. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 represented collected cells infected with VSVMT-WA1 of passages 1, 5, and 10, respectively; Lanes 4, 5, and 6 represented those infected with VSVMT-Delta of passages 1, 5, 10; lines 7, 8, 9 represented those infected with VSVMT-Omicron of passages 1, 5, 10; line 10 represented VSV-GFP control. (D) Selective infection of hACE2-positive cell lines. hACE2-BHK21 and BHK21 cells were infected with rVSVMT-SΔ21 chimera viruses or VSVMT-GFP at MOI of 1. Twenty-four hours post-infection, GFP expression of infected cells was photographed by a fluorescence microscope. (E) Infectivity of different cell lines with rVSVMT-SΔ21 chimera viruses. Mean Fluorescent Intensity (MFI) was calculated. (F) Syncytia formation of rVSVMT-SΔ21 chimera viruses in different host cells. Virus-induced cytopathic effects are shown in the photomicrographs above. Confluent hACE-293T and VeroE6 cell monolayers were infected with VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron at an MOI of 1. Photographs were taken 24 h after infection. Syncytia mediated by the viruses were shown. (G) One step growth curve of rVSVMT-SΔ21 chimera viruses. VeroE6 cells were infected with VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron at MOI of 3. Plaque titrations from the indicated time points were performed with VeroE6 cells. (H) Plaque size formed by recombinant VSVs in VeroE6 cells. Plaques in Vero cells infected with VSVs. Ten individual plaques were selected randomly to calculate the areas. Images were acquired 24 h post-infection (h.p.i). (I) The average syncytium area (μm2) was evaluated by Image J. ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. Above data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3).

Because ACE2 is the receptor of SARS-CoV-2, the tropism of rescued chimeric viruses (VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron) was initially determined with cells stably expressing hACE2 or not. In the study, hACE2-BHK21 were infected with the above rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 chimera viruses or wild-type viruses (VSV-GFP) at MOI of 1, with BHK21 cells as the control. GFP-positive cells, indicating infection by VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron, were observed in hACE2-BHK21 cells, rather than in BHK21 cells (Fig. 2D). In addition, GFP-positive cells can be detected in both hACE2-BHK21 and BHK21 cells infected with VSV-GFP. The infectivity of rVSV-SARS-CoV-2 chimera viruses was further tested on different cell lines. In SARS-CoV-2 permissive human Huh7 cells along with hACE2-BHK21 cells, high infectivity was observed (Fig. 2E), whereas in non-permissive Hela, HT-29 cells or A549 cells, no apparent infection signal was detected compared with mock control (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2E). The result indicated that retargeting VSVMT with SΔCT21 allows specific infection of host cells through hACE2 receptor. Syncytium formations were also compared among the rVSVs. With ten syncytia selected randomly, the mean areas mediated by various S proteins were observed. As shown in Fig. 2F and I, syncytia formed by VSVMT-Delta were ∼2-fold larger than those formed by VSVMT-WA1, and 5-fold larger than those formed by VSVMT-Omicron in hACE2-293T cells. A similar tendency has been observed in VeroE6 cells, although the syncytia formed by three rVSVs were smaller in contrast to those in hACE2 cells. The result was consistent with those shown by Zhao et al.33, which indicated that the Omicron variant shows less fusogenic in comparison with the Delta variant in TMPRSS2 positive cells.

Replication efficiency of SΔ21-based retargeting VSVMT was characterized by one-step growth curves in VeroE6 cells, which were infected with VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron at a MOI of 3. Triplicate supernatants which sampled at the indicated time points were titrated by plaque assays. The titers of all rVSVs increased after inoculation, with VSVMT-Delta exhibiting the highest replication efficiency compared with VSVMT-WA1 and VSVMT-Omicron. As shown in Fig. 2G, VSVMT-Delta reached its highest titers as early as 12 h.p.i., which is around 3.6 × 106 PFU/mL, whereas VSVMT-WA1 can reach its peak titer of around 2.2 × 106 PFU/mL at about 24 h post-infection. Of note, VSVMT-Omicron can reach the highest titers at about 24 h.p.i., which was around 8.3 × 105 PFU/mL. The maximum differences in replication titers for the viruses occurred at 8 h.p.i. to 12 h.p.i. As shown by Fig. 2G, at 8 h.p.i., the titers of VSVMT-Omicron could be 7 × 102 PFU/mL, whereas the titers of VSVMT-Delta and VSVMT-WA1 was 5.6 × 105 PFU/mL and ∼2 × 105 PFU/mL, respectively. At 12 h.p.i., the title of VSVMT-Delta was 2.5 × 106 PFU/mL, the title of VSVMT-WA1 was ∼2.5 × 105 PFU/mL, and the titer of VSVMT-Omicron was ∼4.4 × 104 PFU/mL. Thus, of the rVSVs tested, the retargeting rVSV encoding S protein of the Delta variant indicated the highest replication efficiency, whereas the VSVMT-Omicron showed the lowest. Comparable results were also observed in plaque assay. Areas of plaques (means ± SD) generated by the different rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses were calculated. VSVMT-Delta forms much bigger plaques (average size of ∼3.83 mm2) than VSVMT-WA1 (average size of 0.42 mm2) and VSVMT-Omicron did (average size of ∼0.10 mm2) (Fig. 2H). As a result, the replication efficiency of the rVSVs in vitro followed the tendency of VSVMT-Delta > VSVMT-WA1>VSVMT-Omicron.

3.3. Quality assessment of virions after ultra-centrifugation

High-quality virions are essential for our vaccine study. Thus, a method for rapid and morphology-preserving purification of rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions with sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation was used34. As shown in Fig. 3A, clearly concentrated corresponding viral proteins were displayed in the purified rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions while the unpurified supernatant samples showed a diffuse background. In purified rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions, the G protein (∼68 kD) of VSV was not detected, whereas clear spike proteins of SARS-CoV2 (∼200 kD) did (Fig. 3A). In contrast, in purified VSV-GFP virions, the G protein rather than the spike protein could be discerned. In addition, bands (∼50 kD) corresponding to VSV nucleocapsid protein (N) and matrix protein (∼27 kD) were discerned in both the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 and VSV-GFP virion. Thus, the results indicated that the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions can be purified with sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Purification of rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21. VeroE6 Cells were infected rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21. The supernatants were concentrated by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. through a 20% (w/w) sucrose cushion at 90,000 × g for 1.5 h at 4 °C. The pelleted virions were then suspended in DPBS. (A) Concentrated rVSVMT-SΔ21 were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by silver nitrate staining. Lane 1 is the protein marker; lanes 2, 3, 4, 5 represent collected cells infected with VSV-GFP, VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, VSVMT-Omicron respectively; lanes 6, 7, 8, 9 represent purified virions of VSV-GFP, VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, VSVMT-Omicron respectively; line 10 represents control group. (B) Negatively stained representative electron micrographs of VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron virions. (C) M gene sequence analysis of rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses from plaques purified from the serial passage of 5 or 10.

Previous studies reported that ultracentrifugation could lead to some adverse effects on viral morphology and structural integrity, such as influenza virus35. In our study, the intact structure of the ultracentrifugation concentrated rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions were identified by electron microscopy. Importantly, despite the replacement of their original G proteins with S proteins, the virions can keep the bullet-shape morphology and maintain their morphological integrity (Fig. 3B).

The rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 vaccine candidates were constructed based on replication-competent VSVMT, which had been attenuated due to the triple mutations occurring at amino acid position ΔM51, V221F, and S226R of matrix protein in comparison to wild-type VSV. In the study, VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron seed viruses were amplified in the production cell VeroE6 with their M genes sequenced. As described by de Haan et al.24, with a classical method based on viral stock passaging, enough amounts of random plaque identification, the genetic stability of the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 matrix protein gene was confirmed. As shown in Fig. 3C, with wild type VSV M gene as the control, all plaques randomly selected from passages 5 and 10 of each viral stock exhibited consistent modified bases modified bases at amino acid position ΔM51, V221F, and S226R in rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses. No back mutations in the M protein gene were observed after serial passaging.

In summary, based on assessments including SDS-PAGE, electron microscopy observation, as well as matrix gene stability analysis, it indicated that high-quality rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 virions have been successfully prepared, making them suitable for subsequent animal vaccine study.

3.4. rVSVMT indicated improved safeness in contrast to wild-type VSV as the vector encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

VSV has been proved as a promising vaccine and oncolytic vector; however, high-dosed wild-type VSV can cause neurological deficits in animals, especially via the intranasal route36. Thus, potential pathogenicity resulting from infection of VSVMT and wild-type VSV encoding Spike protein of Delta variant was initially evaluated in hamsters, which inoculated intranasally at a dose as high as 5 × 106 PFU/100 μL. The reason to select the Delta variant lies in that it indicates higher virulence than the other known VOC strains37. Of note, our study also confirmed that rVSVMT encoding Delta strain Spike protein possessed the highest replication efficiency and syncytial formation among the strains tested in vitro. The dose of 5 × 106 PFU/100 μL depended on its maximum dose that could be prepared by us for rVSVMT-Delta in a 100 μL volume.

Hamsters were inoculated with rVSVMT-Delta or rVSV-Delta intranasally at doses of 5 × 105 or 5 × 106 PFU/100 μL. Daily monitoring of body-weight changes was performed for 28 days, and the organs, including the testis and spleen, were checked. In addition, liver and kidney function-associated indicators were also evaluated. No treatment-related mortality was observed in administrated animals. As shown in Fig. 4A, the body-weight of hamsters treated with rVSVMT-Delta steadily increased post-infection, similar to the PBS group. In contrast, rVSV-Delta-treated animals lost weight significantly at both doses of 5 × 105 PFU and 5 × 106 PFU. Notably, at 5 days post inoculation (d.p.i), the body weight loss caused by rVSV-Delta could arrive at 8% in the 5 × 106 PFU group.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Safety evaluation of VSVMT in contrast to wild-type VSV as the vectors encoding spike protein. Healthy hamsters were inoculated with VSV-Delta or VSVMT-Delta at doses of 5 × 105, and 5 × 106 PFU/hamster via intranasal routes, with PBS buffer as the control. Body weight loss was monitored daily until 28 days. On 28 d.p.i., animal sera and organs including testis and spleen were also collected. (A) Body weight change of inoculated hamsters. (B) Weight of testis collected from animals on 28 d.p.i. (C) Testis collected from animals at 28 d.p.i. (D) Indicators regarding liver and kidney functions in animal sera collected at 28 d.p.i. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (ALB), carbamide (UREA), and creatinine (CREA) were determined with an automatic biochemical analyzer (E–H). ns, P > 0.05; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

According to a previous report, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with testicular damage in humans38. Furthermore, the mean length and thickness of the spleen decrease in some patients who emerged from SARS-CoV-2. Thus, potential damage to the testis and spleen due to rVSV-Delta or rVSVMT-Delta infection was checked in the study. At 28 d.p.i., the weights of testis were ∼1.7 g in hamsters treated with rVSVMT-Delta at a dose of 5 × 106 PFU, comparable to that in the PBS group. In contrast, the weights of testis reduced to around 1.5 g in animals treated with rVSV-Delta at a dose of 5 × 106 PFU (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4B). With regards to the spleen, the weights were around 0.15 g in all groups, with no difference observed at 28 d.p.i. (Fig. 4C and D). The effects of rVSVMT-Delta, as well as rVSV-Delta on liver and kidney function, were also examined at 28 d.p.i.. With the concentration of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (ALB), carbamide (UREA), and creatinine (CREA) in sera as the indicators, no significant difference was identified between the groups treated with rVSVMT-Delta, rVSV-Delta and PBS control (Fig. 4E–H and Supporting Information Fig. S1). A series of blood routine tests demonstrated that rVSVMT-Delta and rVSV-Delta did not lead to obvious changes in the examined indicators (Supporting Information Fig. S2). However, some testicular damage was observed in high-dosed rVSV-Delta- treated hamsters.

In summary, the results indicated that rVSVMT demonstrated improved safety in contrast to wild-type VSV as the vector encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

3.5. Immunogenicity of chimeric rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses in hamsters via mucosal routes

ACE2 is moderately expressed in the respiratory tract and highly in the intestinal tract of humans. Both tissues can be the invasion sites for SARS-CoV-2. Thus, we focused on the significance of mucosal routes in inducing SARS-CoV-2 specific immune responses by various rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses. Antibody responses stimulated by the live rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses were evaluated in the collected samples of serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Golden syrian hamsters were administrated with rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 (VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron) via mucosal routes of intranasal or per oral (PO) at doses of 1 × 105 or 1 × 106 PFU/hamster, with the intramuscular route as the control. Three animals were used in each group, and their body weight changes were monitored daily. In addition, morbidity including ruffled fur, lethargy, and hunched posture were also monitored. Blood specimens were gathered from animals on 0, 7, and 28 days post-immunization (d.p.i). Immunized animals were euthanized at 28 d.p.i., with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and tissues harvested for evaluation. Neutralization antibodies against various strains of SARS-CoV-2 in serum and BALF samples were also detected with the above corresponding rVSVMT-SΔ21 viruses that expressed GFP protein. Titers were negative before study initiation as well as in the mock-infected hamsters.

Serum antibody responses in animals administrated rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses indicated a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5 and Table 5). In each group of animals, the NAb titers at a dose of 1 × 106 PFU are higher than those at 1 × 105PFU (P < 0.01). However, after vaccination with the same dose, neutralizing Ab (NAb) titers were rapidly induced at 7 d.p.i, but did not increase significantly at 28 d.p.i in most of the groups (Fig. 5 and Table 5). This indicated that the antibodies could be stimulated by VSVMT-encoded S protein early point post-inoculation, similar to those shown in the rVSV-based Ebola vaccine. Of note, the administration route of the rVSVs could play an important role in stimulating NAb in vivo. Much higher NAb titers in sera could be induced via IN than IM or PO routes. For example, in the animals immunized intranasally with VSVMT-Delta at a dose of 1 × 106 PFU, the NAb titers were 5254.0 ± 212.7 at 7 d.p.i., and 13,995.0 ± 6088.21 at 28 d.p.i., respectively. When animals were administrated with the same dose of VSVMT-Delta via IM route, the NAb titers were 1379.9 ± 657 at 7 d.p.i., and 1701.6 ± 188.4 at 28 d.p.i., respectively, roughly 10-fold lower than IN route. Similar trends were also observed in other rVSVs (Fig. 5 and Table 5). In contrast, although antibodies could be elicited in animals by all three rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses via the oral route, whereas much lower than IN and IM routes. The highest titers of neutralizing antibodies in sera induced by PO routes were observed in VSVMT-WA1, which was 594.5 ± 947.0 at 7 d.p.i., and 386.9 ± 584.0 at 28 d.p.i., when at a dose of 1 × 106 PFU. However, the large SD values suggested that the mechanism still needs to be identified, although the PO route may be potentially promising for delivering VSV-based COVID-19 vaccine, due to the high ACE2 expression in small intestine tissues.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Antibody responses in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples after immunization. The immunogenicity of VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron was determined in the hamsters immunized at a single dose of 105 PFU or 106 PFU via IN, IM, or PO routes. PBS was used as the mock control. Sera were collected on 0, 7, and 28 days post inoculation (d.p.i). BALF were harvested on 28 days post-inoculation. Serum and BALF neutralization titers were quantified using VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron respectively. The titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of antibody giving a 100% inhibition of cytopathic effect. The plots show the geometric mean with geometric standard deviation (n = 3). (A, B) NT values of sera samples from hamsters vaccinated via different routes. Samples were collected on 7 d.p.i (a); and 28 d.p.i (b). (C) NT values of BALF samples from hamsters vaccinated via different routes. Samples were collected on 28 d.p.i.. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Table 5.

Hamster serum and BALF neutralizing antibody titers.

Recombinant VSVs route 7-day post vaccination
28-day post vaccination
Serum


Serum


BALF


105 PFU 106 PFU Mock 105 PFU 106 PFU Mock 105 PFU 106 PFU Mock
VSVMT-WA1 IM 612.0 ± 366.3 2385.8 ± 1269.4 <5 571.9 ± 294.1 2081.3 ± 404.7 <5 8.8 ± 2.3 20.8 ± 3.7 <2
IN 2365.0 ± 476.7 3803.0 ± 1183.5 2152.0 ± 831.0 6087.3 ± 3976.0 15.1 ± 4.7 28.9 ± 11.4
PO 38.4 ± 12.0 594.5 ± 947.0 41.9 ± 16.9 386.9 ± 584.0 12.7 ± 1.9 47.8 ± 44.5
VSVMT-Delta IM 1055.0 ± 242.7 1379.9 ± 657.2 1588.4 ± 930.7 1701.6 ± 188.4 21.1 ± 3.2 51.6 ± 31.3
IN 2050.0 ± 1226.2 5254.0 ± 212.7 <5 1992.0 ± 681.7 13995.0 ± 6088.2 <5 108.2 ± 12.0 107.2 ± 19.0 <2
PO 69.9 ± 56.3 203.7 ± 201.7 82.9 ± 34.4 94.2 ± 23.4 46.2 ± 21.3 63.9 ± 35.0
VSVMT-Omicron IM 285.3 ± 72.0 369.2 ± 86.6 274.6 ± 179.6 429.1 ± 59.0 6.9 ± 1.6 30.8 ± 15.4
IN 1136.1 ± 222.4 2691.0 ± 1842.3 2036.3 ± 314.6 2358.3 ± 1200.8 46.6 ± 50.0 39.7 ± 13.1
PO 23.8 ± 6.1 55.9 ± 14.5 <5 34.0 ± 9.6 67.5 ± 33.0 <5 27.0 ± 5.9 38.3 ± 15.6 <2

–not applicable.

Among the attenuated rVSV encoding various S proteins, it indicated that VSVMT-Delta can induce the most potent antibody responses. Omicron is the one with more potent transmissibility than other known strains39. However, the antibody responses induced by VSVMT-Omicron were significantly lower than those induced by VSVMT-Delta and VSVMT-WA1. The detailed mechanism also needs further study, although our in vitro results demonstrated that the replication efficiency as well as the syncytium formation by VSVMT-Omicron indicated a significant reduction in contrast to the other two rVSVs.

The levels of neutralization antibody (NAb) in BALF are often used as an important indicator for evaluating the effect of mucosal immune responses. Circulating S-specific B and T cell immunity could be induced by mRNA-based vaccine. However, in COVID-19 convalescents, these immune responses were attenuated in BALF of vaccinated individuals40. In BALF, despite the generally lower NAb levels observed compared to those in sera, the levels of IN route were still higher than those of IM routes, consistent with the results observed in sera samples, especially in VSVMT-Delta administrated animals. As shown, the neutralizing antibodies in BALF induced by VSVMT-Delta through IN route were 108.2 ± 12.0 in the 105 PFU group and 107.2 ± 19.0 in the 106 PFU group, whereas in IM groups, the Ab titers were 21.1 ± 3.2 in the 105 PFU group and 51.6 ± 31.3 in the 106 PFU group. As a result, our studies support the mucosal immunity achieved via intranasal delivery. Strikingly, although the levels were very low, the PO route demonstrated its efficacy in eliciting mucosal antibodies, as shown in BALF samples collected from the three rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses (Fig. 5 and Table 5).

3.6. No significant adverse effect was observed in hamsters administrated with the VSVMT-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates

Hamsters were administrated via intranasal, intramuscular, or PO at increasing doses of rVSVMT encoding SΔ21 protein of WA1, Delta, or Omicron strain. The doses used were 1 × 105, or 1 × 106 PFU/hamster, with PBS as the control. Adverse effects in animals were examined, which included body weight changes, liver and kidney function. In particular, histopathology and the potential presence of the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses in the lung were detected. Accordingly, gross pathological changes in tissues/organs or other abnormalities were observed and recorded.

Body weight changes and morbidity were monitored daily until 28 d.p.i.. Following administration, neither treatment-related mortality nor noticeable local or systemic reactions were observed in animals inoculated with the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses. As shown in Fig. 6A–C, the administrated animals exhibited a mean group body weight gain and showed no signs of morbidity, similar to that of the control group, suggesting that the tested viral doses were safe. SARS-CoV-2 infection develops typically as a respiratory disease in humans41, leading to severe interstitial pneumonia along with alveolar septa thickening and massive infiltration of inflammatory cells. Liver and kidney damage are also identified as typical occurrences in COVID-19 patients42, 43, 44. Because rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses have been probed to use hACE2 as the cellular entry receptor, potential adverse effects due to the replication-competent rVSVs infection were examined in the organs of the lung, liver, and kidney. Macroscopic examinations indicated that at 28 d.p.i., no treatment-related adverse macroscopical changes in the above organs were observed (not shown). In particular, similar to mock control, histopathological evaluation of lung tissues indicated that the alveolar structure was intact. No hemorrhage was observed in animal blood vessels, and no inflammatory cell infiltration was identified in the lungs from all the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 treated animals (Fig. 6D). With VSV N gene as the marker by RT-qPCR, the CT values in the lung of the vaccinated animals were also determined. As it was shown, no significant difference was found among all groups (P > 0.05) (Fig. 6E). In addition, symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea were not observed after vaccination.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Safety evaluation of chimeric rVSVs encoding the spike of WA1, Delta, and Omicron strain on administrated hamsters. Healthy hamsters were inoculated with VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron at doses of 105,106 PFU/hamster via IN, PO, or IM routes, with PBS buffer as the control. Body weight loss was monitored daily until 28 days. Lung tissues were collected on 28 d.p.i. and examined. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3). (A–C) Body weight changes of vaccinated hamsters. (D) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of lung sections from hamsters collected from administrated groups at a dose of 106 PFU at 28 d.p.i.. (E) The VSV N gene CT value was determined by RT-qPCR with lung tissues collected at 28 d.p.i.. (F–I) Evaluation of liver and kidney function in hamsters. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin (ALB), carbamide (UREA), and creatinine (CREA) were determined with an automatic biochemical analyzer. ns, P > 0.05; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

The effects of the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 Viruses infection on liver and kidney function were examined with sera collected at 28 d.p.i, according to the baseline of the indicators. With regards to liver functions, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total-protein (TP, including albumin and globulin), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin (ALB) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) were detected. As shown, among the indicators detected, no significant difference was observed (P > 0.05) between the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 vaccinated groups and the control group (Fig. 6F and G and Supporting Information Fig. S3). In addition, the indicators regarding kidney functions of creatinine (CREA) and carbamide (UREA) also demonstrated no significant changes compared to the control group (Fig. 6H, I and Fig. S3). Thus, the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses indicated no adverse effect against the potentially targeted organs such as lung via all the tested routes.

In clinical, some SARS-CoV-2 vaccines can lead to rare- and vaccine-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia, which has been called vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)45,46. Herein, a series of blood routine tests show that the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 vaccines did not lead to significant changes in blood indicators regardless of the administrated route (Supporting Information Fig. S4).

In summary, according to the clinical, histopathologic, and hematological data, it demonstrated that is safe at the tested doses regardless of the immune routes.

3.7. Cross-reactivity of NAbs in immunized hamsters induced by chimeric rVSV encoding S proteins of various SARS-CoV-2 strains

Vaccine design against emergent VOCs in pan-coronaviruses is the main aim for the next-generation COVID-19 vaccine. The existence of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) to coronaviruses (CoVs) suggests the possibility of making a broad-spectrum vaccine. It was reported by Tang et al.47 recently that sequential immunization with mucosal adenovirus-S vaccination boosted strong cross-neutralizing antibody responses after systemic mRNA vaccination, not only for the ancestral virus but also for the Omicron variant, which may be due to the heterologous prime and boost procedure. As a promising vaccine vector, it is currently unclear the extent of cross-neutralizing antibody responses induced by VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron, respectively.

The cross-reactivity of serum NAb titers between VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron was tested. Sera with high neutralizing antibody levels collected on 7 and 28 d.p.i were selected and used to measure their cross-protection against heterologous strains. As shown in Fig. 7, in VSVMT-WA1 IN samples, the homologous NAb mean titers were 2723. In contrast, the mean titers of cross-neutralization titers against VSVMT-Delta or VSVMT-Omicron were 225 or 101, respectively, which were 12-fold or 27-fold reduced (Fig. 7A). The results could be due to more mutations accumulated in Spike protein of Omicron variant in compared to that of Delta strain. A similar tendency has been observed in other samples. In sera from VSVMT-Delta administrated animals, the cross-neutralization titers against VSVMT-WA1 or VSVMT-Omicron were reduced by 20-fold or 22.24-fold, respectively (Fig. 7B). In sera from animals administered with VSVMT-Omicron, the cross-neutralization titers of the samples against VSVMT-WA1 or VSVMT-Delta were 14-fold and 16-fold reduced, respectively (Fig. 7C). As a results, neutralization activity was significantly reduced in all samples when reacting with heterologous S protein-based rVSVs. The existing vaccines, which are mainly made with S of classical WA1 strain, may not provide enough protection against the emerging variants. In addition, the cross-neutralizing antibody protection between Delta and Omicron is also very low, suggesting the two strains might have originated differently. It has been reported that the Omicron strain may have originated from immune-deficient patients. The result indicates the complexity of future COVID-19 epidemics. Therefore, in terms of occurrence time, the Omicron emerged and circulated not far from the Delta strain, but the cross-protection of neutralizing antibodies between them was also poor. The S protein from Delta strain dose not seems suitable for developing vaccines for the Omicron variant.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Cross-reactivity among sera antibodies collected from animals vaccinated with VSVMT encoding various S proteins of various SARS-CoV-2 strains. Sera were collected from VSVMT-WA1 (A), VSVMT-Delta (B) or VSVMT-Omicron (C) administrated animals as above. Their neutralization titers against VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, or VSVMT-Omicron were determined. The titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of antibody giving a 100% inhibition of cytopathic effect. The plots show the geometric mean with geometric standard deviation (n = 12).

3.8. The rVSVMT-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates can stimulate comprehensive immune responses effectively in hACE2 transgenic mice

The human ACE2 transgenic mouse is another commonly used animal model for evaluating COVID-19 vaccines. In our study, the transgenic mouse model was set up with hACE2 expression controlled by the mouse ACE2 promoter (Supporting Information Fig. S5A). High levels of hACE2 expressions were detected in the intestine and kidney tissue, while it was moderately expressed in the lung and upper respiratory tract tissue (Fig. S5B and S5C). The expression characteristics are similar with those of humans (Fig. S5D). Consistent with the protocol used in hamsters, as shown above, the hACE2 transgenic mice were inoculated with the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses at a single dose of 1 × 106 PFU/mouse through intranasal (IN), PO, or intramuscular (IM) routes. Animal body weights were monitored daily for two weeks. Sera, as well as BAL fluid, were collected at 28 d.p.i., with neutralization antibody titers (NAb) detected. As shown in Fig. 8A, the administrated animals exhibited body weight gain with all viruses tested via IN, PO, or IM routes.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Immunogenicity of VSVMT-WA1, VSVMT-Delta, and VSVMT-Omicron in hACE2-Mouse by vaccination route. hACE2-Mouse were intranasally (IN), intramuscularly (IM) or orally (per oral, PO) vaccinated with a single dose of VSVMT-Delta, VSVMT-WA1, or VSVMT-Omicron at 1 × 106 PFU/50 μL. (A) The body weight changes of the immunized mice were monitored daily until 14 d.p.i.. (B) Serum and BALF neutralizing antibody titers collected on 28 d.p.i.. The titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of antibody giving a 100% inhibition of cytopathic effect. The plots show the geometric mean with geometric standard deviation. (C, D) S-specific cellular-mediated immune responses. Splenectomies were performed on mice sacrificed at 7 d.p.i (C); and 28 d.p.i (D), following responses with rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21via intranasal route vaccination. VSV-GFP as well as PBS controls were also included. The results are presented as mean ELISPOTS per million splenocytes any background ELISPOTS from unpulsed mock controls standard deviation from the means. ∗P < 0.05. ∗∗P < 0.01. ∗∗∗P < 0.001. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

As shown in Fig. 8B, neutralization antibody levels stimulated by the chimeric rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses in hACE2 transgenic mice demonstrated dependence on the S protein source as well as administration route. In sera collected at 28 h.p.i., neutralization activity could be elicited by the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 candidates via IN, IM, and PO routes. However, with the same virus, serum antibody titers induced in the IM and PO groups were lower than those induced via the IN route. For example, in VSVMT-Delta vaccinated transgenic mice, the NAb titer induced via IN route was 689.2 ± 206.1, whereas in sera via PO or IM routes, the titers were 279.0 ± 91.6 or 395.0 ± 142.1, respectively. Of note, in BALF samples, VSVMT-Delta can induce significantly higher NAb titers via the IN and PO routes than IM route, which were 120.5 ± 27.9, 114.6 ± 34.2 or 43.6 ± 10.8, respectively. The same tendency was also observed in the other rVSVs, which was consistent with the results identified in hamsters. Because neutralizing antibody levels in BALF samples usually reflect mucosal immune responses, it is reasonable to assume that the IN and PO administration routes are effective in eliciting mucosal immunity in transgenic mice. Among the chimeric rVSVMT encoding various S proteins, differences in their immunogenicity were also observed (Fig. 8B). The NAb titer levels followed the tendency of VSVMT-Delta > VSVMT-WA1> VSVMT-Omicron in sera as well as BALF samples.

Cell-mediated immune responses generated by rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 via the intranasal route in hACE2 transgenic mice were further measured with IFN-γ ELISPOT, which was also dependence on the S protein source and dose. As shown in Fig. 8C and D, the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 can stimulate statistically significant (P < 0.01) cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV2 S1 and S2 peptide pool as compared with VSV-GFP and PBS controls. Among all the viruses tested, higher T-cell responses could be stimulated in VSVMT-Delta-immunized mice than in other two strains (P < 0.01). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in animals immunized with VSVMT-Omicron and VSVMT-WA1 immunized at the same dose at 7 or 28 d.p.i.. In the animals vaccinated with the same virus, the T-cell responses were significantly higher in the 106 PFU group than in the 105 PFU group (P < 0.01). Interestingly, a higher level of IFN-γ expression in the splenic T lymphocytes was detected by the ELISPOT assay when stimulated in vitro with the S1 peptide pool as opposed to the S2 pool, which might be due to the presence of immunodominant T cell epitope in S1 domain. The representative spot of the ELISPOT assay was also shown in supporting Information Fig. S6 and Table S2.

In summary, consistent with the above results in hamsters, the rVSVMT-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates can effectively stimulate comprehensive SARS-CoV-2 specific immune responses in hACE2 transgenic mice.

4. Discussion

As a promising mucosal vaccine candidate for countering COVID-19, the safety of replicative rVSV vector is of concern. To overcome this obstacle, we replaced the G protein gene in the VSV genome with a mutant S protein gene (SΔ21) from various SARS-CoV-2 strains and introduced three mutations in the M protein of VSV, including S226R, V221F, and ΔM51 (VSVMT). The VSVMT has shown sufficient safety in previous studies, demonstrating its significantly hampered capacity to inhibit the type I interferon (IFN) signaling pathway and suppress host gene expression compared to wild-type VSV22. Thus, our study takes advantage of VSVMT as a safe vaccine vector aiming at activating mucosal immunity to counter the threat of SARS-CoV-2.

To date, there have been at least two clinical trials involving the preparation of COVID-19 vaccines based on VSV vectors, motivated by VSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP efficacy. However, V590, which was developed by Merck company, demonstrated low immunogenicity with single intramuscular administration in seronegative participants48. This result might be due to that ACE2 is expressed at a low level in muscle tissue cells. So, we focused on mucosal delivery of rVSVMT expressing S proteins via nasal and PO routes, taking advantage of the ideal expression of ACE2 in the tissues. Furthermore, all known vaccines based on VSV vectors nowadays are developed with spike protein of the parental WA1 strain. VOCs such as Delta and Omicron are of extreme concern because of their virulence and transmissibility. In the study, the immunogenicity of the rVSV chimeric virus, encoding SΔ21 of Omicron, Delta as well as WA1 strain, was investigated and compared in various animal models, which have not been reported before. Additionally, different outcomes due to the conformational changes within various spike proteins, such as fusion activity, were also characterized with the help of the replicative chimeric VSVs.

The Delta variant is regarded as the most virulent among the VOCs, whereas the Omicron variant, a novel SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.529, is the most transmissible49, which might be related to the conformational changes of spike proteins50. The S protein of the Omicron variant accumulates >30 mutations compared to the parental WA1 strain, many of which can be associated with its transmissibility and immune escape49,51. SARS-CoV2 spike protein directs viral attachment by binding cellular receptor ACE2. Afterward, cellular TMPRSS2, or proteases such as Cathepsins B and L in the endosome mediate cleavage of the Spike to activate fusion between the viral and cellular membranes, which allows the virus core to entry the cell cytoplasm. Our in vitro study showed that cell fusion ability directed by S proteins of WA1 and VOC strains differed significantly. As shown by the study, the replication and syncytium formation followed the tendency of VSVMT-Delta > VSVMT-WA1>VSVMT-Omicron. VSVMT-Delta possessed potent replication and fusogenic ability in host cells. The result is consistent with the reports that the Omicron strain shows much less fusogenic compared with Delta, which might be due to the difference in entry pathway between Omicron and Delta variants52. Omicron variant infection is mainly mediated via the endocytic pathway rather than enhanced by TMPRSS233. Because syncytia formation itself is an important way for viruses to escape host immunity, this also may have an impressive implication for the Delta variant on the manifestations or disease severity in clinical53. The detailed protein motif, as well as the amino acid sites associated with the mechanism, deserve further investigation.

In our study, the spike protein expression obtained from the VSVMT-S variants was sufficient to generate high NAb titers in hamster models via routes of IN, PO, and IM. Unlike the results reported in humans by Robbins et al.48, our experiments showed that a single shot of rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 via the intramuscular route can induce considerable neutralization activity in hamsters via the IM route using all the three chimeric rVSVs, including the classical WA1 strain. Of note, we also revealed the superior immunogenicity of a single IN dose of VSVΔGMT-SΔ21 compared to a single IM or PO dose of VSVMT-Variants. IN vaccination with all the VSVΔGMT-SΔ21 viruses resulted in serum and BALF neutralization antibody titers exceeding those in animals vaccinated by IM injection. Furthermore, we demonstrated the generation of cell-mediated immune responses by rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 via intranasal administration in animals. Thus, as the important indicator for mucosal immune responses, the presence of high-titer neutralizing antibodies in BALF samples as shown by our studies reveals the key role of intranasal immunization with VSVMT-based COVID-19 vaccines. The results might be attributed to the spike-dependent chimeric VSV infection and replication in the respiratory tract mucosa. Consistent with our findings, it has also been shown that compared to COVID-19 convalescents, healthy individuals inoculated with mRNA vaccines had significantly lower levels of neutralizing antibodies in the BALF, despite robust S-specific antibody responses in the blood47. Strikingly, serum neutralization antibody titers were also detected in BALF samples in animals administrated via PO routes, although lower compared to than IN route. The result could be attributed to the high levels of hACE2 expression in the intestine, suggesting the possibility of developing a COVID-19 vaccine via the oral route. Optimal carriers for the gastrointestinal delivery of the rVSV vaccine may serve as an alternative solution to improve efficacy.

Previous clinical reports suggest that SARS-CoV induces stronger humoral immune responses than SARS-CoV-254,55. We also demonstrated that the immunogenicity of the rVSVΔGMT-SΔ21 vaccine candidates was strain-dependent. Our in vivo study in both hamster and transgenic mice models indicated that the immunogenicity of VSVMT-Omicron was significantly lower than that of VSVMT-Delta and VSVMT-WA1. The immunogenicity of VSVMT-Delta ranks the highest, which indicates not only humoral immunity and mucosal immunity but also cellular immunity. This result is consistent with the different replication efficiency of the rVSVMT-SΔ21 viruses in vitro, potentially resulting from the conformational changes among S proteins of various COVID-19 strains.

Facing the challenge of rapid mutation of SARS-CoV-2, some challenges remain to be resolved in future studies, such as the development of a universal vaccine. At present, vaccines are mostly based on the classical WA1 strain. However, our results demonstrated that the cross-reactivity reduced significantly among various rVSVMT-SΔ21 viruses, especially between VSVMT-WA1 versus VSVMT-Omicron. The genetic distance between the Omicron strain and the classical strain was significant. This result suggested that the existing vaccines based on the classical strain are not sufficient to protect against Omicron variant infection due to the genetic distance between Omicron and WA1 train. Although the occurrence time of the Omicron and Delta variants was less than one year, the cross-neutralization activity induce by their S protein is also very low. Thus, it seems that the Delta variant is not suitable for developing a vaccine against the Omicron strain. Sequential vaccinations which combine the VSVMT-based Omicron vaccine candidate with the currently licensed inactivated vaccine or mRNA vaccine might be a promising strategy to improve the efficacy of VSVMT-based Omicron vaccine candidate, as well as provide cross-protection among various variants of concern.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully generated a series of mucosal vaccine candidates to counter COVID-19 based on a highly attenuated VSVMT vector. In animal models of hamster and hACE2-mouse, it was demonstrated that a single-dose intranasal immunization with the vaccines can elicit effective mucosal and cellular immunity with full rein safety. Considering the urgent need to develop mucosal vaccines against SARS-CoV2 infection, in particular the Omicron strain as well as its emerging variants, rVSVMT can be the promising platform for commercial mucosal vaccines.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Biomedicine and Technology Supporting Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Plan (Grant Nos. 22S11902200 and 20S11904900, China) and Open grant of Engineering Research Center of Cell & Therapeutic Antibody, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Grant No. 19X110020009-003, China).

Author contributions

Conception and design: Tao sun, Baohong Zhang, Yong Ke and En Zhang. Yong K, En Zhang, Jianming Guo, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Lei Wang, Duo Chen and Xinkui Fang contributed to perform experiments. ACE2-mouse animal model: Feng Li, En Zhang and Xiaoxiao Zhang. Analysis and interpretation of data: Yong Ke and En Zhang. Statistical analysis and drafting of the manuscript: Yong Ke and En Zhang. Critical revision of the manuscript: Tao sun, Jianwei Zhu and Baohong Zhang. Final approval of the manuscript: Tao sun and Baohong Zhang.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review under the responsibility of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Appendix A

Supporting data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2023.08.023.

Contributor Information

Feng Li, Email: lifeng30286@shaphc.org.

Tao Sun, Email: tao.sun@sjtu.edu.cn.

Baohong Zhang, Email: bhzhang@sjtu.edu.cn.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article.

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.WHO. Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. Available from: covid19.who.int.
  • 2.Hatmal M.M., Alshaer W., Al-Hatamleh M.A.I., Hatmal M., Smadi O., Taha M.O., et al. Comprehensive structural and molecular comparison of Spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and their interactions with ACE2. Cells. 2020;9:2638. doi: 10.3390/cells9122638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bian J., Li Z. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2): SARS-CoV-2 receptor and RAS modulator. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Braun J., Loyal L., Frentsch M., Wendisch D., Georg P., Kurth F., et al. SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells in healthy donors and patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2020;587:270–274. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2598-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen Z., Du R., Galvan Achi J.M., Rong L., Cui Q. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and targeted antiviral development. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:3879–3888. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Awadasseid A., Wu Y., Tanaka Y., Zhang W. Current advances in the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17:8–19. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.52569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Padron-Regalado E. Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: lessons from other coronavirus strains. Infect Dis Ther. 2020;9:255–274. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00300-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Topol E.J. Messenger RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2021;184:1401. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu F., Luo S., Zhang Y., Ou Y., Wang H., Guo Z., et al. Single-shot AAV-vectored vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 with fast and long-lasting immunity. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2023;13:2219–2233. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chavda V.P., Patel A.B., Vaghasiya D.D. SARS-CoV-2 variants and vulnerability at the global level. J Med Virol. 2022;94:2986–3005. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bleier B.S., Ramanathan M., Jr., Lane A.P. COVID-19 vaccines may not prevent nasal SARS-CoV-2 infection and asymptomatic transmission. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;164:305–307. doi: 10.1177/0194599820982633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harvey W.T., Carabelli A.M., Jackson B., Gupta R.K., Thomson E.C., Harrison E.M., et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19:409–424. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00573-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mercado N.B., Zahn R., Wegmann F., Loos C., Chandrashekar A., Yu J., et al. Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature. 2020;586:583–588. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2607-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amanna I.J., Slifka M.K. Contributions of humoral and cellular immunity to vaccine-induced protection in humans. Virology. 2011;411:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li H., Zhang Y., Li D., Deng Y.Q., Xu H., Zhao C., et al. Enhanced protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 elicited by a VSV vector expressing a chimeric spike protein. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2021;6:389. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00797-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wong G., Mendoza E.J., Plummer F.A., Gao G.F., Kobinger G.P., Qiu X. From bench to almost bedside: the long road to a licensed Ebola virus vaccine. Expet Opin Biol Ther. 2018;18:159–173. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1404572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Madar-Balakirski N., Rosner A., Melamed S., Politi B., Steiner M., Tamir H., et al. Preliminary nonclinical safety and immunogenicity of an rVSV-ΔG-SARS-CoV-2-S vaccine in mice, hamsters, rabbits and pigs. Arch Toxicol. 2022;96:859–875. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03214-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Espeseth A.S., Yuan M., Citron M., Reiserova L., Morrow G., Wilson A., et al. Preclinical immunogenicity and efficacy of a candidate COVID-19 vaccine based on a vesicular stomatitis virus-SARS-CoV-2 chimera. EBioMedicine. 2022;82 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morozov I., Monath T.P., Meekins D.A., Trujillo J.D., Sunwoo S.Y., Urbaniak K., et al. High dose of vesicular stomatitis virus-vectored Ebola virus vaccine causes vesicular disease in swine without horizontal transmission. Emerg Microb Infect. 2021;10:651–663. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1903343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huttner A., Dayer J.A., Yerly S., Combescure C., Auderset F., Desmeules J., et al. The effect of dose on the safety and immunogenicity of the VSV Ebola candidate vaccine: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:1156–1166. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00154-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Agnandji S.T., Huttner A., Zinser M.E., Njuguna P., Dahlke C., Fernandes J.F., et al. Phase 1 trials of rVSV Ebola vaccine in Africa and Europe. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1647–1660. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fang X., Qi B., Ma Y., Zhou X., Zhang S., Sun T. Assessment of a novel recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus with triple mutations in its matrix protein as a vaccine for pigs. Vaccine. 2015;33:6268–6276. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bewley K.R., Coombes N.S., Gagnon L., McInroy L., Baker N., Shaik I., et al. Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody by wild-type plaque reduction neutralization, microneutralization and pseudotyped virus neutralization assays. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:3114–3140. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00536-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de Haan C., Haijema B., Boss D., Heuts F., Rottier P. Coronaviruses as vectors: stability of foreign gene expression. J Virol. 2005;79:12742–12751. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.20.12742-12751.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao X., Zhang R., Qiao S., Wang X., Zhang W., Ruan W., et al. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 neutralization from inactivated and ZF2001 vaccines. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:277–280. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2206900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nie J., Li Q., Wu J., Zhao C., Hao H., Liu H., et al. Establishment and validation of a pseudovirus neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microb Infect. 2020;9:680–686. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1743767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McBride C.E., Li J., Machamer C.E. The cytoplasmic tail of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein contains a novel endoplasmic reticulum retrieval signal that binds COPI and promotes interaction with membrane protein. J Virol. 2007;81:2418–2428. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02146-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Havranek K.E., Jimenez A.R., Acciani M.D., Lay Mendoza M.F., Reyes Ballista J.M., Diaz D.A., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Spike alterations enhance pseudoparticle titers and replication-competent VSV-SARS-CoV-2 virus. Viruses. 2020;12:1465. doi: 10.3390/v12121465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baum A., Fulton B.O., Wloga E., Copin R., Pascal K.E., Russo V., et al. Antibody cocktail to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prevents rapid mutational escape seen with individual antibodies. Science. 2020;369:1014–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.abd0831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ma H., Guo Y., Tang H., Tseng C.-T.K., Wang L., Zong H., et al. Broad ultra-potent neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants by monoclonal antibodies specific to the tip of RBD. Cell Discovery. 2022;8:16. doi: 10.1038/s41421-022-00381-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ma H., Tseng C.-T.K., Zong H., Liao Y., Ke Y., Tang H., et al. Efficient neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 omicron and other VOCs by a broad spectrum antibody 8G3. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.02.25.482049. Available from: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ke Y., Yu D., Zhang F., Gao J., Wang X., Fang X., et al. Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing the spike protein of genotype 2b porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: a platform for vaccine development against emerging epidemic isolates. Virology. 2019;533:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2019.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhao H., Lu L., Peng Z., Chen L.L., Meng X., Zhang C., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant shows less efficient replication and fusion activity when compared with Delta variant in TMPRSS2-expressed cells. Emerg Microb Infect. 2022;11:277–283. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2023329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hammarstedt M., Ahlqvist J., Jacobson S., Garoff H., Fogdell-Hahn A. Purification of infectious human herpesvirus 6A virions and association of host cell proteins. Virol J. 2007;4:101. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-4-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sugita Y., Noda T., Sagara H., Kawaoka Y. Ultracentrifugation deforms unfixed influenza A virions. J Gen Virol. 2011;92:2485–2493. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.036715-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chauhan V.S., Furr S.R., Sterka D.G., Jr., Nelson D.A., Moerdyk-Schauwecker M., Marriott I., et al. Vesicular stomatitis virus infects resident cells of the central nervous system and induces replication-dependent inflammatory responses. Virology. 2010;400:187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Islam S., Islam T., Islam M.R. New coronavirus variants are creating more challenges to global healthcare system: a brief report on the current knowledge. Clin Pathol. 2022;15 doi: 10.1177/2632010X221075584. 2632010x221075584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li C., Ye Z., Zhang A.J., Chan J.F., Song W., Liu F., et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by intranasal or intratesticular route induces testicular damage. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75:e974–e990. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Han P., Li L., Liu S., Wang Q., Zhang D., Xu Z., et al. Receptor binding and complex structures of human ACE2 to spike RBD from omicron and delta SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2022;185:630–640. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.001. e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Corbett K.S., Flynn B., Foulds K.E., Francica J.R., Boyoglu-Barnum S., Werner A.P., et al. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in nonhuman primates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1544–1555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang S., Liu Y., Wang X., Yang L., Li H., Wang Y., et al. SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:120. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lei H.Y., Ding Y.H., Nie K., Dong Y.M., Xu J.H., Yang M.L., et al. Potential effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the gastrointestinal tract and liver. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;133 doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xu L., Liu J., Lu M., Yang D., Zheng X. Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections. Liver Int. 2020;40:998–1004. doi: 10.1111/liv.14435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Y., Liu S., Liu H., Li W., Lin F., Jiang L., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection of the liver directly contributes to hepatic impairment in patients with COVID-19. J Hepatol. 2020;73:807–816. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cines D.B., Bussel J.B. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2254–2256. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2106315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schultz N.H., Sørvoll I.H., Michelsen A.E., Munthe L.A., Lund-Johansen F., Ahlen M.T., et al. Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2124–2130. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tang J., Zeng C., Cox T.M., Li C., Son Y.M., Cheon I.S., et al. Respiratory mucosal immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after mRNA vaccination. Sci Immunol. 2022;7 doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.add4853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Robbins J.A., Tait D., Huang Q., Dubey S., Crumley T., Cote J., et al. Safety and immunogenicity of intramuscular, single-dose V590 (rVSV-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine) in healthy adults: results from a phase 1 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. EBioMedicine. 2022;82 doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nyberg T., Ferguson N.M., Nash S.G., Webster H.H., Flaxman S., Andrews N., et al. Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study. Lancet. 2022;399:1303–1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00462-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kumar S., Thambiraja T.S., Karuppanan K., Subramaniam G. Omicron and Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2: a comparative computational study of spike protein. J Med Virol. 2022;94:1641–1649. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ren S.Y., Wang W.B., Gao R.D., Zhou A.M. Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2: mutation, infectivity, transmission, and vaccine resistance. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10:1–11. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Suzuki R., Yamasoba D., Kimura I., Wang L., Kishimoto M., Ito J., et al. Attenuated fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Nature. 2022;603:700–705. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04462-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Willett B.J., Grove J., MacLean O.A., Wilkie C., De Lorenzo G., Furnon W., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is an immune escape variant with an altered cell entry pathway. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:1161–1179. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01143-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stukalov A., Girault V., Grass V., Karayel O., Bergant V., Urban C., et al. Multilevel proteomics reveals host perturbations by SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Nature. 2021;594:246–252. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03493-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lee E., Oh J.E. Humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and the impact on COVID-19 pathogenesis. Mol Cell. 2021;44:392–400. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2021.0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Articles from Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES