Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e233954. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3954

Earnings of US Physicians With and Without Disabilities

Mihir Kakara 1,2,, Atheendar S Venkataramani 2,3
PMCID: PMC10692836  PMID: 38038987

Abstract

This cross-sectional study uses American Community Survey data to assess disability earnings gaps for physicians between 2005 and 2019.

Introduction

Workers with disabilities earn less than workers without disabilities across industries.1 These earnings disparities have not been well studied among physicians. Potential disability earnings gaps in medicine are important to characterize as more individuals with disabilities enter medicine, facing significant challenges in medical education2 and higher risks of mistreatment at work.3 Furthermore, as the share of physicians in older age groups grows,4 disability incidence increases.

Methods

This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2005 to 2019 American Community Survey (ACS).5 Institutional review board review was not required given the use of public deidentified data. We followed the STROBE reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies. Physicians aged 35 to 65 years were identified by self-reported occupation as physician or surgeon. Disability status was defined as answering yes to any of 6 disability types queried in the ACS (eMethods in Supplement 1). We used data on employment status, hours and weeks worked, and annual personal earned income. We used linear regression models to examine differences in logged annual and hourly personal earned income and total hours worked by disability status, adjusting for age, sex, self-reported race and ethnicity, state-metropolitan area fixed effects, and survey year, along with subgroup analyses of annual income by age group and disability type. ACS collected surgical specialty from 2018 onwards. Survey weights were used for all analyses, which were conducted in April 2023 using Stata version 17.0 (StataCorp). Significance was set at 2-sided P < .05.

Results

The study cohort included 92 469 physicians, of whom 1953 (weighted, 2.0%) reported having a disability (Table 1). In adjusted analyses of employed physicians, annual earned income was 20.8% (95% CI, −25.2% to −16.3%; P < .001) lower and hourly earned income was 13.3% (95% CI, −17.3% to −9.4%; P < .001) lower among physicians with disabilities. Physicians reporting disabilities worked 110 hours per year less on average compared with those without disabilities. Estimated differences in annual income by disability status were similar after adjusting for hours worked and surgical specialty status and across age groups; estimates were much larger for disabilities affecting cognitive function, ambulation, independent living, and self-care than vision or hearing (Table 2).

Table 1. Characteristics of US Physicians by Disability Status, 2005 to 2019a.

Characteristic No. (%) P value
No disability (n = 90 516) Any disability (n = 1953)b
Age, median (SD), y 48 (8.7) 55 (8.6) <.001
Age group, y
35-44 32 804 (99.0) 323 (1.0) <.001
45-54 30 437 (98.3) 577 (1.7)
55-65 27 275 (96.5) 1053 (3.5)
Sex
Female 30 447 (98.0) 655 (2.0) <.001
Male 60 069 (98.1) 1298 (1.9)
Race and ethnicity
American Indian or Alaska Native 174 (91.2) 13 (8.8) <.001
Black/African American 3696 (97.9) 81 (2.1)
Chinese 3562 (98.9) 43 (1.1)
Hispanic 5063 (97.7) 120 (2.3)
Cuban 793 (98.1) 19 (1.9)
Mexican 1331 (96.6) 50 (3.4)
Puerto Rican 728 (97.4) 16 (2.6)
Other Hispanice 2211 (98.3) 35 (1.7)
Not Hispanic 85 543 (98.1) 1833 (1.9)
Japanese 483 (98.9) 8 (1.1)
Pacific Islander 36 (90.8) 2 (9.2)
South Asian 7931 (98.9) 93 (1.0)
White 68 334 (97.9) 1590 (2.2)
2 Races 1436 (98.1) 34 (1.9)
≥3 Races 127 (94.6) 9 (5.4)
Other Asianc 4032 (98.7) 63 (1.3)
Other race, NECd 705 (98.4) 17 (1.6)
Disability type
Sensoryf NA 1074 (55.4) NA
Hearingf NA 642 (39.9) NA
Visionf NA 296 (19.8) NA
Ambulatory NA 476 (24.2) NA
Self-care NA 146 (7.5) NA
Cognitive NA 133 (6.5) NA
Independent living NA 124 (6.3) NA
Labor force participation
Not in labor force 1016 (92.3) 87 (7.8) <.001
Among employed physicians
Usual hours worked per week, mean (SD)g 51.05 (14.82) 48.71 (16.83) <.001
Weeks worked last yearg
1-13 447 (93.5) 30 (6.5) <.001
14-26 702 (96.7) 32 (3.4)
27-39 1261 (96.6) 46 (3.4)
40-47 4133 (97.6) 107 (2.4)
48-49 4406 (97.9) 89 (2.2)
50-52 78 277 (98.2) 1542 (1.8)
Annual earned income,h mean (SD), $g,i 131 287.28 (79 175.34) 113 186.27 (78 654.66) <.001
Hourly earned income,j mean (SD), $g 53.51 (32.79) 48.48 (32.16) <.001

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; NEC, not elsewhere classified.

a

Unadjusted and weighted. Weighting was done for means and SDs for continuous variables and for percentages only for categorical variables.

b

Defined as answering yes to any of the 6 disability questions in the American Community Survey (ACS) related to vision, hearing, cognitive, ambulatory, self-care, or independent-living.

c

Includes Bhutanese, Burmese, Cambodian, Filipino, Hmong, Indonesian, Korean, Laotian, Malaysian, Mongolian, Nepalese, Taiwanese, Thai, Vietnamese, and other Asian ethnicities not included in above categories.

d

All other races not elsewhere classified in the ACS.

e

Includes Argentinian, Bolivian, Chilean, Colombian, Costa Rican, Dominican, Ecuadorian, Guatemalan, Honduran, Nicaraguan, Panamanian, Paraguayan, Peruvian, Salvadoran, Spaniard, Uruguayan, Venezuelan, and other Hispanic ethnicities not included in above categories.

f

Includes vision or hearing disability or both. This was combined for all years as ACS started asking separate questions for vision and hearing disability only from 2008. Vision and hearing disability prevalence are reported separately only for years 2008-2019, and hence do not add up to 100%.

g

Includes only physicians who reported being employed.

h

Annual earned income denotes income earned from wages or a person’s own business or farm for the previous year. It is the total of annual wages and net preincome tax self-employment income from a business, professional practice, or farm.

i

All values adjusted to 2011 US dollars.

j

Hourly earned income calculated by dividing annual earned income by total hours worked in the year. Total hours worked is calculated by multiplying hours worked per week and weeks worked in the year.

Table 2. Differences in Earnings and Total Hours Worked for Employed US Physicians With vs Without a Disabilitya.

Variable Adjusted models Models additionally adjusting for total hours worked
Estimate [SE] (95% CI) P value Estimate [SE] (95% CI) P value
Overall analysis
Difference in annual earned income,b percentage pointsc −20.8 [0.02] (−25.2 to −16.3) <.001 −18.3 [0.02] (−22.5 to −14.2) <.001
Difference in total hours worked (annual)d −109.7 [25.01] (−158.7 to −60.7) <.001 NA NA
Difference in hourly earned income,e percentage pointsc −13.3 [0.02] (−17.3 to −9.4) <.001 −15.4 [0.02] (−19.4 to −11.4) <.001
Subgroup analyses for years 2018 and 2019
Difference in annual earned income,b percentage pointsc
Model without surgical specialtyf −11.5 [0.06] (−22.9 to −.0000173) .05 −11.4 [0.05] (−21.8 to −1.1) .03
Model with surgical specialtyf −11.6 [0.06] (−22.7 to −0.5) .04 −11.6 [0.05] (−22.2 to −0.5) .04
Subgroup analysis by age group
Difference in annual earned income,b percentage pointsc
Age 35-44 y −13.7 [0.05] (−24.3 to −3.2) .01 −13.4 [0.05] (−23.6 to −3.3) .01
Age 45-54 y −23.2 [0.04] (−31.7 to −14.7) <.001 −21.8 [0.04] (−29.7 to −13.9) <.001
Age 55-65 y −22.1 [0.03] (−27.9 to −16.3) <.001 −16.9 [0.03] (−22.2 to −11.8) <.001
Subgroup analyses by disability type compared with those without disability
Difference in annual earned income,b percentage pointsc
Cognitive −40.4 [0.09] (−57.8 to −22.9) <.001 −36.2 [0.08] (−52.0 to −20.4) <.001
Ambulatory −40.5 [0.05] (−49.4 to −31.5) <.001 −36.0 [0.04] (−44.4 to −27.6) <.001
Independent living −45.0 [0.12] (−67.7 to −22.4) <.001 −37.4 [0.11] (−58.4 to −16.4) <.001
Self-care −43.6 [0.09] (−61.1 to −26.2) <.001 −33.7 [0.08] (−49.4 to −18.1) <.001
Vision −10.7 [0.06] (−21.8 to 0.3) .06 −7.6 [0.15] (−17.9 to 2.8) .15
Hearing −2.44 [0.03] (−8.8 to 3.9) .45 −3.7 [0.23] (−9.9 to 2.4) .23

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

All outcomes were analyzed for employed physicians aged 35-65 years, using linear regression models with robust SEs. Models were adjusted for fixed effects for age (individual years), sex (male, female), race (Black/African American, White, and other), ethnicity (Hispanic, not Hispanic), state and metropolitan area, and survey year.

b

Annual earned income denotes income earned from wages or a person’s own business or farm for the previous year. It is the total of annual wages and net preincome tax self-employment income from a business, professional practice, or farm.

c

Because logged income was used as the dependent variable, estimated earnings disparities can be expressed as percent differences (coefficient multiplied by 100).

d

Total hours in a year worked is calculated by multiplying hours worked per week and weeks worked in the year.

e

Hourly earned income calculated by dividing annual earned income by total hours worked in the year. Total hours worked is calculated by multiplying hours worked per week and weeks worked in the year.

f

The American Community Survey started dividing physicians into “surgeons” and “other physicians” from 2018. For years 2018 and 2019, total number of surgeons in these 2 years was 838, with 820 reporting no disability, and 18 reporting a disability. The total number of nonsurgeons was 12 568, with 12 331 reporting no disability and 237 reporting a disability.

Discussion

Physicians reporting disabilities had significantly lower earnings than physicians without disabilities. These results should motivate new efforts to better characterize these disparities and address critical data gaps. For example, data on age at disability onset, degree of disability, and longitudinal earnings trajectories before and after disability onset will be crucial for understanding how income may vary across physicians and over time as well as underlying mechanisms.

Similarly, larger physician data sets that already collect subspecialty and income data should collect disability data to characterize the extent to which specialty sorting may explain our findings. The increasing disability prevalence with age suggests many disabilities were acquired after choosing a specialty. If subspecialty-based income gaps are found to exist, physicians with disabilities may continue to face structural barriers to entering and staying in high-paying or procedural specialties, even though qualitative work has documented successful integration of physicians with disabilities into procedural specialties.2

In addition, collecting data on potential discrimination faced by physicians with a disability is important. Employer discrimination may be a key basis of disability-based income disparities.1

As a population-based census survey, the ACS has advantages of a large sample size, detailed income measures, and potentially less susceptibility to stigma-related underreporting of disability. Our study also has potential limitations. First, physician incomes may be underreported in the ACS.5 How this underreporting biases our results is not clear. Second, the disability prevalence (2.0%) in our sample is lower than a previously reported estimate (3.1%).6 This discrepancy may be explained by differences in sample sizes, sample age cutoffs, and disability definition.

Supplement 1.

eMethods. Data Source, Identification of Sample, Covariates, and Outcome Measures

eReferences

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement

References

  • 1.Kruse D, Schur L, Rogers S, Ameri M. Why do workers with disabilities earn less? occupational job requirements and disability discrimination. BJIR. Published online August 31, 2017.
  • 2.Meeks LM, Jain NR. Accessibility, Inclusion, and Action in Medical Education: Lived Experiences of Learners and Physicians With Disabilities. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meeks LM, Conrad SS, Nouri Z, Moreland CJ, Hu X, Dill MJ. Patient and coworker mistreatment of physicians with disabilities. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(10):1396-1402. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.IHS Markit Ltd . The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2019 to 2034. June 2021. Accessed October 4, 2023. https://digirepo.nlm.nih.gov/master/borndig/9918417887306676/9918417887306676.pdf
  • 5.Gottlieb JD, Polyakova M, Rinz K, Shiplett H, Udalova V. Who values human capitalists' human capital? healthcare spending and physician earnings. July 2020. Accessed October 4, 2023. https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2020/adrm/CES-WP-20-23.html
  • 6.Nouri Z, Dill MJ, Conrad SS, Moreland CJ, Meeks LM. Estimated prevalence of US physicians with disabilities. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211254. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

eMethods. Data Source, Identification of Sample, Covariates, and Outcome Measures

eReferences

Supplement 2.

Data Sharing Statement


Articles from JAMA Health Forum are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES