Abstract
Background and Objectives:
Antibiotic resistance is a significant problem that restricts the options for treating bacterial pneumonia. This research aimed to determine the bacterial causes of pneumonia and antibiotic resistance among hospitalized patients in southwest Ethiopia.
Materials and Methods:
We collected and analyzed 150 sputum samples from individuals with community-acquired pneumonia from April 1st to October 30th, 2019. Standard bacteriological procedures were used to identify the bacteria. Kirby Bauer’s disk diffusion method was used to assess the bacteria’s susceptibility patterns. Production of carbapenemase and extended-spectrum-lactamase were confirmed phenotypically. Odds ratios and the chi-square test were computed.
Results:
On the whole, bacterial pathogens were verified in 50% of the sputum samples. The predominant bacterial isolates were Klebsiella species, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. About 77.5% of isolates were multidrug resistant. Moreover, 40.5% and 10.8% of the isolates were ESBL and carbapenemase producers, respectively. Aging, tobacco smoking, previous history of pneumonia, heart disease, and chronic respiratory disease had association with sputum culture-positivity.
Conclusion:
As a result, it is important to regularly monitor the bacterial etiologies and their patterns of resistance. Additionally, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics should all be taken into account while managing patients with pneumonia empirically in this context.
Keywords: Pneumonia, Bacterial, Etiology, Antimicrobial drug resistance, Hospitalized, Ethiopia
INTRODUCTION
Infections of the trachea, bronchi, and lung parenchyma are known as lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). This includes lung abscesses, acute bronchitis, and pneumonia (1, 2). One of the main reasons for hospitalization and death worldwide is pneumonia (3). Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is an infection obtained after at least 48 hours of hospitalization, whereas community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an infection acquired outside of the hospital setting. Numerous microbes, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi, can cause it (4, 5).
According to many studies, a variety of factors, including an increase in patient age, the existence of comorbidities, cigarette and alcohol use, and chronic malnutrition, put the population at risk for pneumonia (6, 7). Additionally, the use of recent antibiotics, corticosteroids, and structural lung disease are risk factors for gram-negative pneumonia infection (8).
The commonest etiologies of pneumonia are viruses to which antibiotics are often unnecessarily prescribed (9, 10). Additionally, there can be significant differences in the microbial flora and antimicrobial resistance patterns between and within nations, regions, hospitals, ICUs within hospitals, and specimen sources through different means (11, 12). As a result, accurate diagnosis of the causes of pneumonia and knowledge of their susceptibility patterns will help to reduce the need for unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, which could help fight antimicrobial resistance (9, 10, 12).
In Ethiopia, bacterial etiologies of community-acquired pneumonia from outpatients, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella species, S. aureus, H. influenzae, Pseudomonas species and Acinetobacter species are frequently isolated with different levels of resistance for different antibiotics (13–16). However, there is no published data on the bacteriological profiles and patterns of antibiotic resistance among hospitalized patients in Ethiopia with community-acquired pneumonia in general and in the research context. Thus, this study was conducted to identify bacterial etiologies and associated antibiotic resistance patterns among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia at Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Jimma, Ethiopia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and setting.
From April 1 to October 30, 2019, a cross-sectional study was carried out at Jimma Medical Centre in Jimma Town, southwest Ethiopia. With a bed capacity of 800, it is the only teaching and referral hospital in the country’s southwest. With a catchment population of more than 20 million people, it serves over 15,000 inpatients, 160,000 outpatient attendants, 11,000 emergency cases, and 4500 deliveries annually.
Source population.
All adult patients clinically diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia at Jimma Medical Center.
Study population.
All adult hospitalized patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia at Jimma Medical Center from April 1 to October 30, 2019.
Inclusioncriteria.
All adult hospitalized patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia agreed to the study and provided written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria.
The study excluded patients who were seriously unwell, known cases of tuberculosis, a history of hospital admission in the previous two weeks, those who were admitted to the hospital for at least 48 hours prior to data collection and who were unable to provide adequate sputum sample. Finally, a total of 150 study participants who provided good quality of sputum (<10 SECs per LPF and >25 PMNs per LPF on gram stain), recruited using the purposive sampling technique (17).
Data and sample collection.
By using a face-to-face administered structured questionnaire, socio-demographic traits, clinical, and behavioral aspects of the patients were collected. The questionnaire had a pretested to ensure its reliability and necessary modifications were made as a result. Other important medical data of the patient were obtained from the patient medical record. Expectorated sputum specimens were collected under possible aseptic conditions. All samples were delivered to the medical center’s microbiology lab, where a bacteriological study was carried out.
Bacterial isolation and identification.
Quality of expectorated sputum samples were approved (17). Sputum washing technique was performed and the specimen was inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar and then incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 hours. The inoculated chocolate agar was incubated at 35–37°C for 72 hours in a candle jar to provide a 5–10% CO2 concentration for isolation of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Hemophilus influenzae. After the indicated time, quantitative sputum culture was employed (18, 19). Finally, the bacterial identification was done using standard microbiological techniques including colony characterization, series of biochemical tests (20).
Antimicrobial susceptibility test.
Following the recommendations of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the isolates for different antibiotic was determined using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid Ltd., England) (21). Following an overnight incubation period, the diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured in millimeter and, in accordance with the CLSI guideline, interpreted as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant (21). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria were classified as isolated bacteria that are resistant to at least one antimicrobial drug in three or more antimicrobial categories (22).
Extended spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase detection.
Using the MASTTM D68C and D73C combination disc sets, respectively, ESBL and carbapenemase production were assessed in gram-negative isolates. The zone of inhibition was measured and recorded on an excel sheet following an overnight incubation at 35–37°C. It was then transferred to Mast Group’s ESBL/AmpC and CARBA plus calculator spreadsheet (Mast Group, UK) and classified as either positive or negative for ESBL/AmpC and/or carbapenemase.
Quality control.
The specimen’s quality was assessed using Bartlett’s acceptance and rejection criteria. Furthermore, sputum washing technique and quantitative sputum culture were employed to reduce the heavy growth of commensal organisms from sputum culture (18, 19). The CLSI guideline was followed while using the control strains from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC): P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, E. coli ATCC 25922, and S. aureus ATCC 25923. As a control for ESBL detection, ESBL-positive ATCC 700603 K. pneumoniae and ESBL-negative ATCC 25922 E. coli control strains were also employed.
Data management and statistical analysis.
Before being loaded into EpiData version 3.1 and exported to IBM® SPSS® version 25 for analysis, the data were examined for consistency and accuracy. The results of the descriptive statistics computation were presented in tables and graphs. Fisher’s exact test, chi-square test, odds ratios with corresponding confidence intervals, and patient clinical and demographic data and outcome variables were calculated to examine the link between them. The cutoff for statistical significance was set at p-values below 0.05.
Ethical considerations.
The Jimma University Institute of Health’s institutional review board granted ethical approval (Ref No. IHRPGD/565/2019). Each participant in the study, or their legal guardian, provided written informed consent. The study participants’ privacy was protected while the data were collected, analyzed, and interpreted. Patients in the study had their test findings communicated to their attending physicians for case management.
RESULTS
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
A total of 150 patients diagnosed with community acquired pneumonia for a period of seven months were enrolled. More than half, 52.7% (79/150) of the participants were females (Table 1).
Table 1.
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia at Jimma Medical center, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019 (n=150).
Variable | Categories | Number | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 18–35 | 55 | 36.7 |
36–49 | 46 | 30.7 | |
50–64 | 27 | 18 | |
≥65 | 22 | 14.6 | |
Sex | Female | 79 | 52.7 |
Male | 71 | 47.3 | |
Residence | Urban | 64 | 42.7 |
Rural | 86 | 57.3 | |
Occupation | Employed | 10 | 6.7 |
Farmer | 44 | 29.3 | |
Merchant | 9 | 6.0 | |
Housewife | 68 | 45.3 | |
Daily laborer | 10 | 6.7 | |
Others | 9 | 6.0 | |
History of tobacco smoking | Yes | 20 | 13.3 |
No | 130 | 86.7 | |
Alcohol consumption | Yes | 17 | 11.3 |
No | 133 | 88.7 | |
Comorbidities | Chronic renal disease | 31 | 20.7 |
Chronic heart disease | 32 | 21.3 | |
Chronic respiratory disease* | 31 | 20.7 | |
Diabetes | 22 | 14.7 | |
HIV/AIDS | 27 | 18.0 | |
Others** | 16 | 10.7 | |
No comorbidities | 20 | 13.3 | |
History of pneumonia | Yes | 34 | 22.7 |
No | 116 | 77.3 | |
History of antibiotic treatment*** | Yes | 110 | 76.3 |
No | 40 | 26.7 |
Abbreviations: Chronic respiratory disease
*: COPD + Asthma + Bronchiectasis
**: Malignancy + Gastritis + Chronic liver disease;
***: Use of antibiotics in the previous three months
Bacterial profile among hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia.
In this study, the magnitude of potentially pathogenic bacterial isolates was 50% (75/150). About 80 bacteria were identified which were grouped under 12 different bacterial types, where 80% of them were gram-negative bacilli. The predominant bacterial isolates were Klebsiella spp. 23.8% (19/80), followed by P. aeruginosa 21.3% (17/80), S. aureus 11.25% (9/80), and S. pneumoniae 8.75% (7/80) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Profile of bacterial isolates among hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia in Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019.
Antimicrobial resistance patterns of the isolates.
Gram-negative isolates tested resistant for ampicillin (100%), cefuroxime (87.2%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (89.1%) in antibiogram tests. A significant percentage of resistance to ampicillin (100%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (78.9%), and doxycycline (73.9%) was demonstrated by Klebsiella spp. Additionally, it was shown that third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin resistance was present in 47.4% to 68.4% of isolated Klebsiella species. 88.5% of isolated P. aeruginosa were found to be resistant to ceftazidime, cefepime, and augmentin. In addition, 29.4% of the isolated P. aeruginosa were meropenem-resistant (Table 2).
Table 2.
Gram-negative bacterial isolates’ antibiotic resistance patterns from hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019.
List of Isolates | Pattern | Antibiotic resistance pattern (%) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
TOB | CN | AMK | CAZ | CRO | FEP | AMC | CAF | SXT | CXM | AMP | CIP | MRP | DOX | ||
Klebsiella spp. (19) | R | 3 (15.8) | 3 (15.8) | 3 (15.8) | 12 (63.2) | 13 (68.4) | 9 (47.4) | 10 (52.6) | 12 (63.2) | 15 (78.9) | 14 (73.7) | 19 (100) | 7 (36.8) | 3 (15.8) | 14 (73.9) |
E. coli (6) | R | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | 5 (83.3) | 6 (100) | 6 (100) | 4 (66.7) | 1 (16.7) | 6 (100) |
Citrobacter spp. (4) | R | 1 (25) | 1 (25) | 0 | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 3 (75) | 2 (50) | 3 (75) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 2 (50) | 0 | 3 (75) |
Proteus spp. (2) | R | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 0 | 2 (100) |
Enterobacter spp. (4) | R | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | 0 | 3 (75) | 4 (100) | 3 (75) | 3 (75) | 2 (50) | 3 (75) | 4 (100) | NT | 2 (50) | 0 | 4 (100) |
Serratia spp. (1) | R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 | 1 (100) |
P. aeruginosa (17) | R | 6 (35.3) | 4 (23.5) | 5 (29.4) | 15 (88.2) | 17 (100) | 15 (88.2) | 15 (88.2) | 14 (82.4) | 17 (100) | NT | NT | 9 (52.9) | 5 (29.4) | NT |
Acinetobacter spp. (7) | R | 2 (28.6) | 2 (28.6) | 2 (28.6) | 7 (100) | 7 (100) | 6 (85.7) | 6 (85.7) | 6 (85.7) | 7 (100) | 7 (100) | NT | 5 (71.4 | 3 (42.6) | 5 (71.4) |
B. cepacia (2) | R | 0 | 0 | 1 (50) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | NT | 2 (100) | 2 (50) | 2 (100) |
H. influenzae (2) | R | NT | NT | NT | NT | 1 (50) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | 2 (100) | 0 | 0 | 2 (100) |
Total (64) | R | 16 (25.8) | 14 (22.6) | 13 (21) | 49 (79.0) | 54 (84.4) | 44 (68.8) | 44 (68.8) | 45 (70.3) | 57 (89.1) | 41 (87.2) | 34 (100) | 34 (53.1) | 14 (2.2) | 39 (83) |
Where: TOB-Tobramycin, CN-Gentamycin, CAZ-Ceftazidime, FEP-Cefepime, CAF-chloramphenicol, AMC-Amoxicillin-clavulanate, CRO-Ceftriaxone, CIP - Ciprofloxacin, MRP– Meropenem, AMP-Ampicillin, SXT-Trimethoprim-us, Doxy-Doxycycline, NT- not tested, spp: species, R-Resistant.
Likewise, among Gram-positive bacterial isolates, S. aureus showed high resistance to penicillin (100%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88.9%), and tetracycline (77.8%). While 77.8% of isolated S. pneumoniae was oxacillin-resistant, and 88.9% of isolated S. aureus was methicillin-resistant (MRSA) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Gram-positive bacterial isolates’ antibiotic resistance patterns from hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019.
List of Isolates | Pattern | Antibiotics resistance pattern % | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||
CN | CAF | TE | SXT | CIP | OXA | P | FOX | CLD | ERY | ||
S. aureus (9) | R | 3 (33.3) | 6 (66.7) | 7 (77.8) | 8 (88.9) | 2 (22.2) | NT | 9 (100) | 8 (88.9) | 4 (44.4) | 5 (55.6) |
S. pneumoniae (7) | R | NT | 5 (71.4) | 4 (57.1) | 6 (85.7) | NT | 6 (85.7) | NT | NT | 2 (28.6) | 3 (42.8) |
Total (16) | R | 3 (33.3) | 11 (68.8) | 11 (68.8) | 14 (87.5) | 2 (22.2) | 6 (85.7) | 9 (100) | 8 (88.9) | 6 (37.5) | 8 (50) |
Where: CN-Gentamycin, CAF-Chloramphenicol, TE-Tetracycline, SXT-Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, CIP-Ciprofloxacin, FOX-Cefoxitin, P-Penicillin, CLD-Clindamycin, and ERY- Erythromycin, OXA-Oxacillin, NT-not tested, spp. species, R-Resistant.
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates.
Overall, multidrug resistance was observed in 62/80 (77.5%) of the isolates. The MDR level among frequent isolates was as follows, Klebsiella spp. 10 (52.6), P. aeruginosa 1 (88.2%), S. aureus 9 (100%), Acinetobacter spp. 7 (100%), and E. coli 4 (66.7) (Table 4). In this study, a history of antibiotic use within three months before the current admission was statistically associated with MDR bacterial isolates 68/80 (85%) (P < 0.05) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates from hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia in JUMC, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2019.
Bacterial isolates | Level of resistance (number (%)) | Total MDR isolates | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
R0 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | ≥R8 | ≥R3 (%) | |
Klebsiella spp. (19) | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 (52.6) | ||
E. coli (6) | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 (66.7) | ||||||
Citrobacter spp. (4) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 (100) | |||||
Proteus spp. | 1 | 1 | 2 (100) | |||||||
Enterobacter spp. (4) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 (100) | ||||||
Serratia spp. | 1 | 1 (100) | ||||||||
P. aeruginosa (17) | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 15 (88.2) | ||||
Acinetobacter spp. (7) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 (100) | ||||
B. cepacia | 2 | 2 (100) | ||||||||
H. influenzae | 1 | 1 | 1 (50) | |||||||
S. aureus (9) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 (100) | |||||
S. pneumoniae (7) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 (42.9) | |||||
Total (80) | 62 (77.5) |
Where: R0: susceptible to all antibiotics, R1–R8: resistance to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 classes of antibiotics, respectively, ≥R3: resistance to 3 or more classes of antibiotics, MDR: multidrug resistance
Prevalence of ESBL and AmpC β-lactamase producing gram-negative isolates.
Of the isolated enterobacteriacae, 41.7% (15/36) was found ESBL producers, 22.2% (8/36) were AmpC β-lactamase producers and 11.1% (4/36) of isolates were carbapenemase producer. In Klebsiella species, a high percentage of ESBL and Carbapenemase production were confirmed (31.6% and 15.8%, respectively) (Table 5).
Table 5.
Frequency of ESBL and Carbapenemase producing enterobacteriacae isolates from hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia in Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019.
Isolates | ESBL+ | AmpC+ | ESBL & AmpC+ | ESBL+ & ESBL & AmpC+ | Carbapenemase producer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Klebsiella spp. (n = 19) | 2 (10.5%) | 0 | 4 (21.1%) | 6 (31.6%) | 3 (15.8%) |
E. coli (n = 6) | 2 (33.3%) | 0 | 1 (16.7%) | 3 (50%) | 1 (16.7%) |
Enterobacter spp. (n = 4) | 2 (50%) | 1 (25%) | 0 | 2 (50%) | 0 |
Proteus spp. (n = 2) | 1 (50%) | 0 | 1 (50%) | 2 (100%) | 0 |
Citrobacter spp. (n = 4) | 1 (25%) | 0 | 1 (25%) | 2 (100%) | 0 |
Serratia spp. (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total (n = 36) | 8 (22.2%) | 1 (2.7%) | 7 (19.4%) | 15 (41.7%) | 4 (11.1%) |
Where: ESBL+: Extended beta-lactamase positive Spp.: species.
Factors associated with culture-positive sputum among adult hospitalized patients community acquired pneumonia.
Selected variables that are suitable for logistic regression analysis were subjected to bivariate and multivariate analyses (Table 6). In the bivariate logistic analysis’s overall set of variables, six variables such as age, tobacco smoking status, history of pneumonia, history of antibiotic use, heart disease, and chronic respiratory disease were associated with sputum culture positivity at a P value <0.25. The multivariable logistic regression analysis included all the factors that were associated with sputum culture positivity at a P value <0.25 in the bivariate logistic regression analysis. Sputum culture positivity had a significant association with age 65 years (AOR: 4.11; 95% CI: 1.04 -16.27), tobacco smoking (AOR: 7.00; 95% CI: 1.36 -36.18), prior history of pneumonia (AOR: 6.58; 95% CI: 2.11–20.54), chronic heart disease (AOR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.34 -7.97), and chronic respiratory disease (AOR: 4.04; 95% CI: 1.40 -11.67) (Table 6).
Table 6.
Sputum culture positivity among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia in JUMC, southwest, Ethiopia, 2019: a bivariate and multivariable analysis of the variables.
Variables | Culture result | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Negative (%) | Positive (%) | |||||
Age, year | 18–35 | 35 (46.7) | 20 (26.7) | 1 | ||
36–49 | 24 (32) | 22 (29.3) | 1.60 (0.72–3.56) | 0.89 (0.34–2.32) | 0.804 | |
50–64 | 12 (16) | 15 | 2.19 (0.86- 5.58) | 1.12 (0.34–3.65) | 0.850 | |
>65 | 4 (5.3) | 18 (24) | 7.87 (2.44–26.54) 4. | 11 (1.04–16.27) | 0.044* | |
Sex | Female | 41 (54.7) | 38 (50.7) | 1 | ||
Male | 34 (45.3) | 37 (49.3) | 1.17 (0.62–2.23) | |||
Residence | Urban | 33 (44) | 31 (41.3) | 1 | ||
Rural | 42 (56) | 44 (58.7) | 1.12 (0.58–2.13) | |||
Tobacco smoking status | ||||||
No | 73 (97.3) | 57 (76) | 1 | |||
Yes | 2 (2.7) | 18 (24) | 11.53 (2.57–51.73) | 7.00 (1.36–36.18) | 0.020* | |
Alcohol consumption | ||||||
No | 69 (92.0) | 64 (85.3) | 1 | |||
Yes | 6 (8.0) | 11 (14.7) | 1.98 (0.69–5.65) | |||
Previous history of pneumonia | ||||||
No | 70 (93.3) | 46 (61.3) | 1 | |||
Yes | 5 (6.7) | 29 (38.7) | 8.83 (3.19–24.46) | 6.58 (2.11–20.54) | 0.001* | |
History of Antibiotic use | ||||||
No | 28 (37.3) | 12 (16) | 1 | 1 | ||
Yes | 47 (62.7) | 63 (84) | 3.13 (1.44–6.77) | 2.47 (0.95–6.44) | 0.063 | |
Renal disease | ||||||
No | 62 (82.7) | 57 (76) | 1 | |||
Yes | 13 (17.3) | 18 (24) | 1.51 (0.68–3.45) | |||
Chronic heart disease | ||||||
No | 66 (86) | 52 (69.3) | 1 | |||
Yes | 9 (14) | 23 (30.7) | 3.24 (1.38–7.64) | 3.01 (1.34–7.97) | 0.026* | |
Chronic respiratory disease | ||||||
No | 67 (89.3) | 52 (69.3) | 1 | 4.04 (1.40–11.61) | 0.010* | |
Yes | 8 (10.7) | 23 (30.7) | 3.70 (1.53–8.95) | |||
HIV/AIDS | ||||||
NO | 61 (81.3) | 62 (82.7) | 1 | |||
Yes | 14 (18.7) | 13 (17.3) | 0.91 (0.39–0.21) | |||
Diabetes | ||||||
NO | 63 (84) | 65 (86.7) | 1 | |||
Yes | 12 (16) | 10 (13.3) | 0.81 (0.34–2.00) |
Where: COR: Crude odds ratio, AOR: Adjusted odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, Chronic respiratory disease: COPD + Asthma + Bronchiectasis,
*: statically significant
DISCUSSION
Pneumonia is among the leading causes of hospitalization and mortality in the world (3). Reduced occurrence of these consequences can be achieved through early diagnosis, awareness of the main bacterial etiologies, and understanding of the distribution of antibiotic resistance. As a result, this study was carried out to provide details on the bacterial etiological agents of pneumonia acquired in the community in hospitalized patients and its pattern of antibiotic resistance. In this investigation, hospitalized patients had a 50% prevalence of culture-confirmed community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, which is comparable to the 50.4% study finding from Egypt (23) and lower than study finding reported in Nigeria at 81.5% (24). But this finding was higher than studies reported in Sri Lanka 29.4% (25) and Philippines 40.0% (26). This study found was also higher than previous studies’ findings published on bacterial etiology of community-acquired pneumonia among adult outpatients in Ethiopia, ranging from 32.1% -45.0% (13–16). The variation in study population, geographic area, sample size and type, differences in specific methodologies and diagnostic methods, mean duration of hospital exposure, and prior antibiotic use may all contribute to the difference in the prevalence of aetiology of community acquired pneumonia in various studies.
In this study, 80% of the isolates were Gram-negative bacilli. The most frequently isolated bacteria were Klebsiella spp. (22.3%) and P. aeruginosa (21.4%) (Fig. 1), which was comparable to other studies reported from China, the most common pathogen was Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella spp, P. aeuruginosa (27), whereas the most isolated organism in Nigeria were Streptococcus pneumoniae followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus (24). On the other hand, the commonly prevalent bacterial isolates in other studies conducted in different geographical regions of Ethiopia and elsewhere in the world were S. pneumoniae, Klebsiella spp., S. aureus and Pseudomonas species (13–16, 28). These high rates of gram-negative bacterial etiologies of community acquired pneumonia in current study might be explained by previous use of antibiotics and its consequent selective pressure, patient type (many of study participants had chronic disease), and diagnostic methods.
In this study, a high antibiotic resistance rate was observed with most groups of tested antibiotic with a multidrug resistance rate of 77.5% of isolates (Tables 2, 3, and 4). Frequently isolated Klebsiella spp. showed resistance ranging from 68.4% to 47.4% to third and fourth-generation cephalosporins, and 73.9% to doxycycline. The ceftriaxone resistance rate in this study (84.4%) was higher than in previous studies reported in Ethiopia, ranging from 13.2–19.4%. We also noticed that 88.9% of isolated S. aureus were MRSA. This MRSA rate was also higher than previous studies in Ethiopia (13–15, 24). This high resistance might be due to the regular use of these antibiotics that have been prescribed frequently, which contributes to the development of drug resistance through time. In addition, the difference between the different studies could be the fact that our study subjects were hospitalized patients and commonly with underlying diseases. But the MDR resistance rate was lower than the rate of antibiotic resistance patterns of bacterial isolates among patients with lower respiratory tract infection reported in the same study setting by Mussema et al. 93.8% of the isolates were MDR and the resistance rates of gram-negative bacterial isolates were ranged from 88% to 80% to third and fourth-generation cephalosporin’s (18). This might be as a result of exposure to beta lactam medications repeatedly during recurrent exacerbations.
In this study, the magnitude of ESBL and carbapenemase producing enterobacteriacae were 41.7% (15/36) and 11.1% (4/36) (Table 5), respectively. The resistance for these β-lactam antibiotics due to the production of β-lactamases is becoming a worldwide problem. These can be developed when bacterial gene mutate continuously in response to overuse or misuse of β-lactam antibiotics (18, 29). In this study, the magnitude of ESBLs production was in agreement with study reported in Jimma Ethiopia 40.4% (30), higher than study reported in Addis Ababa Ethiopia 57.7% (31) and Nigeria 58.0% (32), and higher than study finding reported in Nepal 28.1% (33). Concerning to carbapenemase resistance, this study finding was lower than study reported in Jimma Ethiopia 28% (18) and in India, 85% of LRTI isolates were carbapenem resistant (34). These heterogeneity could be brought about by variations in the study population, specimen type, number of samples collected, level of consumption of antibiotics, and methods for identification. Moreover, variation in resistance to antibiotics might be due to difference in availability and owing to little use of them.
High resistance to these commonly recommended antibiotics might be due to irrational use of antibiotics and self-medication of these drugs in community and hospital settings. Moreover, prior use of antibiotics had significant association with MDR pattern of the bacterial isolates (Table 7). This result also might be highlights a lack of antimicrobial stewardship and effective infection control practices in the study area in particular.
Table 7.
Association between multidrug-resistant bacterial isolation and a history of antibiotics use from a sputum samples among hospitalized patients with community acquired pneumonia in Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia, 2019.
Variable | Categories | MDR | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Yes | No | ||||
Bacterial isolates from patient with a | Yes (68) | 56 | 12 | 4.7 (1.3–16.9) | P = 0.019 |
history of antibiotic use | No (12) | 6 | 6 | 1 |
In Ethiopia, there are indications of misuse of antibiotics in and out of hospital settings. These, together with the rapid spread of resistant bacteria and poor surveillance system, contributed to the problem of AMR (35). In addition, a recent systematic review reports on bacterial infection in Ethiopia indicated that most bacterial isolates were resistant to widely used antibiotics (36). Hence, antibiotic resistance is an important clinical concern in our country, which demands tireless efforts to rationalize antibiotic use in and out -of-hospital settings.
In addition, according to this study, finding, aging ≥65 years (AOR: 4.11; 95% CI: 1.04–16.27), tobacco smoking (AOR: 7.00; 95% CI: 1.36–36.18), previous history of pneumonia (AOR: 6.58; 95% CI: 2.11–20.54), chronic heart disease (AOR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.34–7.97), and Chronic respiratory disease (AOR: 4.04; 95% CI: 1.40–11.67) were significantly associated with sputum culture positivity (Table 6). This finding is consistent with different studies reported in the different part of the world (13–16, 37–39).
There is sufficient data to conclude that advancing age is a significant risk factor that is directly related to aging-related physiological changes and a higher prevalence of chronic diseases. Elderly people are more susceptible to CAP due to changed lung defense systems such as impaired mucociliary clearance, impaired alveolar defense, inefficient coughing, and swallowing difficulties (40, 41).
Impaired left ventricular performance with heart failure may all help to explain the association between chronic heart disease and CAP (42). In addition, persistent mucus production, physiological changes that impair host immunity, the presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in the airways, infection, and chronic respiratory disease patients may be more likely to develop pneumonia than healthy people (38, 43).
Limitations of the study.
The proportion of culture confirmed pneumonia might be under estimated since prior antibiotic therapy affects the recovery of some bacterial etiologies. Contrary, specimen passes through URT where a lot of contaminants are there, so despite we use sputum validity criteria to overcome the problem, still some of the isolates might be a contaminant. Although combinations of different classes of antibiotics were tested, newer beta-lactamase inhibitors and fluoroquinolones, were not tested. Even though this study focused on hospitalized patients, unlike other Ethiopian studies done on outpatients, this study used a limited sample size due to limited resources. In the last, the study was only conducted at JUMC, therefore the data acquired there might not be typical of all Ethiopian adults who were hospitalized for pneumonia.
CONCLUSION
A comparable culture positive rate was reported in this study with predominant bacterial etiologies of Klebsiella spp., P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus. Many of the isolated bacteria were MDR’s and ESBL producers. The prior antibiotic exposure were found to be highly associated with the MDR pattern. Thus, proper management of patients with pneumonia in the setting should put these and other identified factors into consideration. Additionally, regular monitoring of pneumonia etiologies and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern is necessary to raise the standard of therapy and to rationalize antibiotic use in and out -of-hospital settings.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Jimma University for providing the ethical approval necessary to conduct this study. Additionally, we are appreciative of the data collectors and study participants who voluntarily took part in the investigation.
REFERENCES
- 1.Eccles S, Pincus C, Higgins B, Woodhead M, Guideline Development Group . Diagnosis and management of community and hospital acquired pneumonia in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2014; 349: g6722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Garau J, Huchon G, Ieven M, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17 Suppl 6(Suppl 6): E1–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lanks CW, Musani AI, Hsia DW. Community-acquired Pneumonia and Hospital-acquired Pneumonia. Med Clin North Am 2019; 103: 487–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S27–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2017; 66: 1–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cillóniz C, Polverino E, Ewig S, Aliberti S, Gabarrús A, Menéndez R, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on cause and outcome in community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2013; 144: 999–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Torres A, Peetermans WE, Viegi G, Blasi F. Risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia in adults in Europe: a literature review. Thorax 2013; 68: 1057–1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Falguera M, Carratalá J, Ruiz-González A, García-Vidal C, Gázquez I, Dorca J, et al. Risk factors and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli. Respirology 2009; 14: 105–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ouedraogo AS, Jean Pierre H, Bañuls AL, Ouédraogo R, Godreuil S. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance in West Africa: contributing factors and threat assessment. Med Sante Trop 2017; 27: 147–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pavia AT. Viral infections of the lower respiratory tract: old viruses, new viruses, and the role of diagnosis. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52 Suppl 4(Suppl 4): S284–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Beardsley JR, Williamson JC, Johnson JW, Ohl CA, Karchmer TB, Bowton DL. Using local microbiologic data to develop institution-specific guidelines for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2006; 130: 787–793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goudarzi M, Navidinia M. Overview perspective of bacterial strategies of resistance to biocides and antibiotics. Arch Clin Infect Dis 2019; 14(2): e65744. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Temesgen D, Bereded F, Derbie A, Biadglegne F. Bacteriology of community acquired pneumonia in adult patients at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8: 101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gebre AB, Begashaw TA, Ormago MD. Bacterial profile and drug susceptibility among adult patients with community acquired lower respiratory tract infection at tertiary hospital, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21: 440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Assefa M, Tigabu A, Belachew T, Tessema B. Bacterial profile, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and associated factors of community-acquired pneumonia among adult patients in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2022; 17 (2): e0262956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dessie T, Jemal M, Maru M, Tiruneh M. Multiresistant bacterial pathogens causing bacterial pneumonia and analyses of potential risk factors from Northeast Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2021; 2021: 6680343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee D-H, Kim S. Clinical analysis of sputum Gram stains and cultures to improve the quality of sputum cultures. Lab Med Qual Assur 2020; 42: 33–39. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mussema A, Beyene G, Gashaw M. Bacterial isolates and antibacterial resistance patterns in a patient with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a tertiary teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2022; 2022: 9709253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rattani S, Farooqi J, Jabeen G, Chandio S, Kash Q, Khan A, et al. Evaluation of semi-quantitative compared to quantitative cultures of tracheal aspirates for the yield of culturable respiratory pathogens - a - cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med 2020; 20: 284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheesbrough M. (2006). District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries—Part 2. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 21.CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 33th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2023. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/doc uments/m100/ [Google Scholar]
- 22.Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 268–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.El-Sokkary RH, Ramadan RA, El-Shabrawy M, El-Korashi LA, Elhawary A, Embarak S, et al. Community acquired pneumonia among adult patients at an Egyptian university hospital: bacterial etiology, susceptibility profile and evaluation of the response to initial empiric antibiotic therapy. Infect Drug Resist 2018; 11: 2141–2150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iroezindu MO, Chima EI, Isiguzo GC, Mbata GC, Onyedum CC, Onyedibe KI, et al. Sputum bacteriology and antibiotic sensitivity patterns of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adult patients in Nigeria: a 5-year multicentre retrospective study. Scand J Infect Dis 2014; 46: 875–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Amarasinghe N, Athavan M, Jayamanne D, Rajapakshe Y, Sadikeen A, Gunasekara K, et al. Bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of adult lower respiratory tract infections in Colombo, Sri Lanka. J Health Soc Sci 2018; 3: 27–36. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lupisan S, Suzuki A, Macalalad N, Egos R, Sombrero L, Okamoto M, et al. Etiology and epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults requiring hospital admission: A prospective study in rural Central Philippines. Int J Infect Dis 2019; 80: 46–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Y, Shou S. Pathogens and drug-resistance of hospital-acquired pneumonia in an EICU in Tianjin, China. Int J Biochem Mol Biol 2021; 12: 49–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hassanzadeh S, Khoramrooz SS, Mazloomirad F, Sharifi A, Roustaei N, Gholamnezhad M, et al. Bacterial profile and their antimicrobial resistance patterns among patients with community-acquired pneumonia in southwestern Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2023; 15: 343–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gupta S, Maheshwari V. Prevalence of ESBLs among Enterobacteriaceae and their antibiotic resistance pattern from various clinical samples. IntJ Curr Microbiol App Sci 2017; 6: 2620–2628. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gashaw M, Berhane M, Bekele S, Kibru G, Teshager L, Yilma Y, et al. Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University medical center: a cross sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018; 7: 138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Teklu DS, Negeri AA, Legese MH, Bedada TL, Woldemariam HK, Tullu KD. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production and multi-drug resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8: 39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ibrahim Y, Sani Y, Saleh Q, Saleh A, Hakeem G. Phenotypic Detection of extended spectrum beta lactamase and carbapenemase co-producing clinical isolates from two tertiary Hospitals in Kano, North West Nigeria. Ethiop J Health Sci 2017; 27: 3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nepal R, Shrestha B, Joshi DM, Joshi RD, Shrestha S, Singh A. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-negative isolates of lower respiratory tract infection. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2018; 16: 22–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Acharya VK, Padyana M, B U, R A, Acharya PR, Juneja DJ. Microbiological profile and drug sensitivity pattern among community acquired Pneumonia patients in tertiary care centre in Mangalore, Coastal Karnataka, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: MC04–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Erku DA, Mekuria AB, Belachew SA. Inappropriate use of antibiotics among communities of Gondar town, Ethiopia: a threat to the development of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2017; 6: 112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reta A, Bitew Kifilie A, Mengist A. Bacterial infections and their antibiotic resistance pattern in ethiopia: a systematic review. Adv Prev Med 2019; 2019: 4380309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cilloniz C, Martin-Loeches I, Garcia-Vidal C, San Jose A, Torres A. Microbial etiology of pneumonia: epidemiology, diagnosis and resistance patterns. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kolditz M, Tesch F, Mocke L, Höffken G, Ewig S, Schmitt J. Burden and risk factors of ambulatory or hospitalized CAP: A population based cohort study. Respir Med 2016; 121: 32–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Prina E, Ranzani OT, Polverino E, Cillóniz C, Ferrer M, Fernandez L, et al. Risk factors associated with potentially antibiotic-resistant pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 153–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cillóniz C, Liapikou A, Ceccato A, Torres A. Risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Minerva Pneumol 2017; 56: 206–216. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yanagi S, Tsubouchi H, Miura A, Matsuo A, Matsumoto N, nakazato M. The impacts of cellular Senescence in elderly Pneumonia and in age-related lung Diseases that increase the risk of respiratory infections. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18: 503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klare B, Kubini R, Ewig S. Risk factors for pneumonia in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Pneumologie 2002; 56: 781–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arancibia F, Bauer TT, Ewig S, Mensa J, Gonzalez J, Niederman MS, et al. Community-acquired Pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: incidence, risk, and prognosis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1849–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]