Abstract
A person's total perception of his or her value or worth is referred to as self-esteem. It may serve as a proxy for how much a person "values, approves of, appreciates, prizes, or likes [him or herself]". The study's major goals were to assess adolescents' levels of self-esteem and examine the impact assertiveness training had on those adolescents' self-esteem. The research design selected for the study was pre-experimental one group pre-test and post-test research design". Anon-probability convenience sampling technique was used to obtain a sample of 60 adolescents who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was the study's primary instrument, a 10-item questionnaire that a person fills out and scores on a 0-3 scale, containing both positive and negative items, is used to measure one's degree of self-esteem. In this case, questions 2, 5, 6, 8, and 9 had lower scores than questions 1,3,4,7 and 10. The Likert scale looks like this: Strongly disagree, strongly agree, agree, and disagree. The mean Self-Esteem score prior to the test was 11.33 with a standard deviation of 1.28, whereas the mean Self-Esteem score after the test was 21.16 with a standard deviation of 1.94. The mean difference of 9.83 is significant at 0.001 levels. The 't' value of 33.4 was higher than the table value. This study provides evidence of adolescents' self-esteem has been improved through assertiveness training.
Keywords: Effect, assertiveness training, self-esteem, adolescents.
Background:
Self-esteem is quite simply one's attitude towards oneself (1965). He described it as a "favorable or unfavorable attitude towards the self". -Morris Rosenberg. The amount of value people place on them is the fundamental meaning of self-esteem. It serves as the evaluative component of self-knowledge. Early on, William James (1890) suggested that self-esteem was a result that depended on how one's successes compared to one's pretensions, as expressed in the following equation: self-esteem=successes pretensions [1]. Self-esteem is a personal evaluation of one's entire value [2]. Every person is capable of evaluating and experiencing it. It is a comprehensive assessment of each person's value. A good sense of worth affects our drive, values, and healthy way of living. When it comes to adolescents, self-esteem varies between the early and late adolescent years. This would suggest that self-esteem has enduring effect on adolescent period [3]. Self-esteem is also dimensional, associates with significant life outcomes, such as physiological, psychological health, academic success, and personality traits. Teenagers with low self-worth may often struggle with depression or eating disorders. Therefore, it is crucial to examine and raise adolescents' self-esteem. A form of therapy called assertive training teaches patients confidence-boosting practices [4]. It aids people in learning to articulate their needs and wants more effectively, particularly those who have a tendency to be passive in doing so. According to a study, self-esteem and academic success are two aspects that assertiveness does not significantly influence. The researcher also discovered that 13%-15% of adolescents in India exhibited passive behaviour [5]. In The location of Mehsana, 25% to 27% of adolescents had been influenced by low levels of assertive behaviour, and 47% to 49 percent of adolescents in Gujarat exhibited low levels of this behaviour [6]. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the assertiveness training on self-esteem among adolescents at Visnagar, Mehsana, Gujarat, India.
Material and Methods:
Research Approach:
In this present study, descriptive research approach was adopted [7]
Research design:
This study employed one group pre-test and post-test design.
Target population:
60 adolescents from Higher Secondary School and colleges at Visnagar, who met the criteria, were the target population in the current research [8,9].
Sampling Technique:
Anon-probability convenient sampling method was chosen for the current research [10].
Sample size and sampling criteria:
The sample consists of 60 adolescents studying at Nootan Sarva Vidhyalaya Higher Secondary School, Visnagar. Adolescents who were studying at Nootan Sarva Vidyalaya Higher Secondary School and university, Visnagar between the ages of 13 to 19 and who were able to communicate in Gujarati, Hindi, or English were included. Adolescents who were unwilling to participate and Adolescents who were not available at the time of data collection were excluded from the study.
Study description:
Demographic variables such as Age, religion, level of education, academic performance, family type, birth order, monthly family income, residential location, co-curricular activity, father's and mother's educational backgrounds, father's and mother's occupations, and age are among the demographic variables were included in this study. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was the study's primary instrument. A questionnaire method was employed for the investigation. There were two parts to the Tool. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem range is a 10-item questionnaire comprising positive and negative items that are meant to gauge an individual's level of self-esteem (Table 1). Each response is scored on a range of 0 to 3. In this case, questions 2,5,6,8 and 9 had lower scores than questions 1,3,4,7 and 10. The Likert scale looks like this: Strongly disagree, strongly agree, agree, and disagree. The present study was approved by the Institutional ethics committee and an informed consent was taken from all the subjects after explaining the test procedures and the goal of the study in local language.
Table 1. Scoring and Interpretation.
| Score | Level of self-esteem |
| Low | 0 -14 |
| Average | 15-25 |
| High Self-Esteem | 26-30 |
Data collection method:
The quality and accuracy of the data obtained are determined by the data collection procedures, which are essential to the research process [11,12]. To conduct the study formal approval was acquired from the Principal and Head of the Department at Nootan College of Nursing, the Head Master, and the Chief Educational Officer at Nootan SarvaVidhyalaya Higher Secondary School. Before the study was done, a brief introduction and explanation of the nature and purpose of the study's intervention were explained. All subjects' parents provided both written and verbal consent. Each week, 10 subjects were chosen. On the first day of the pre-test, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was used to gauge the teenagers' level of self-esteem. Training in assertiveness was provided, and it had eight components: circumstance, respect for others, and appreciation of oneself, appreciation of others, mirror acting, mirror talking, self-improvement exercises, and narrative.
Statistical Analysis:
Data analysis techniques include descriptive and inferential statistics [13]. Data are conveyed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The acquired data were analyzed using MANCOVA and student t-test in SPSS (version 16) at the significant level of P - value 0.05.
Results:
According to given data, 42 adolescents (or 70%) had poor levels of self-esteem, whereas 18 adolescents (or 30%) had moderate levels. The majority of the teenagers (38/63.3%) who participated in the post-intervention assertiveness training assessment had high levels of self-esteem, while 22 (36.7%) had average level.
According to Figure 1 42 (70%) of the adolescents who completed the pre-test had low levels of self-esteem, whereas 18 (30%) had average levels Table 2. After receiving assertiveness training, the majority of the adolescents 38 out of them had high levels of self-esteem in the post-test, while 22 out of them or 36.7% had average levels.
Figure 1.

The cylinder diagram quotes the distribution of adolescents according to their level of Pre and post-test level of Self-Esteem.
Table 2. Frequency and percentage distribution of adolescents according to the level of self-esteem.
| Level of self esteem | Pre-test | Post-test | ||
| F | % | F | % | |
| Low | 42 | 70.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Average | 18 | 30.00% | 22 | 36.70% |
| High | 0 | 0.00% | 38 | 63.30% |
| Total | 60 | 100% | 60 | 100% |
The above table depicts the Mean of the Pre-test and Post-test was11.33 and21.16 respectively and the Standard Deviation of the Pre-test and Post-test was 1.2 and 1.9 respectively. The Mean difference was 9.83. The paired 't' - test value was 33.4.This showed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test levels of Self-Esteem among adolescents.
Figure 2 depicts the Mean of the Pre-test and Post-test was 11.33 and 21.16 respectively and the Standard Deviation of the Pre-test and Post-test was 1.2 and 1.9 respectively. The Mean difference was 9.83. The paired t - 'test value was 33.4. This showed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test levels of Self-Esteem among adolescents Table 3.
Figure 2.

The cylinder diagram depicts the effectiveness of assertiveness training on self-esteem among adolescents.
Table 3. Mean and standard deviation of Pre-test and Post-test level of self-esteem among adolescents.
| Group | Mean | Mean Difference | Standard Deviation | % of Meanscore | 't'value | 'p'-value |
| Pre-Test | 11.33 | 9.83 | 1.2 | 37.70% | T=33.4TV=3.5 | P=0.001*** |
| Post-Test | 21.16 | 1.9 | 73% |
Table 4 explains the association between the levels of Self-Esteem among adolescents with their selected socio-demographic variables. Chi-square analysis revealed that there was an association between the post-test level of Self-Esteem and age(13 years), monthly income(belowRs.3000,)and mothers' educational status (No formal education). All other variables were not significantly associated among the adolescents with their post-test scores.
Table 4. Association between the levels of self-esteem among adolescents with their selected socio-demographic variables.
| Sr | Variables | Categories | Level of self-esteem gain score | Total | |||
| Below | Above | ||||||
| Average (11.38) | Average (>11.38) | ||||||
| F | % | F | % | ||||
| 1. | Age in years | 13-15 Years | 13 | 21.68% | 3 | 5% | 16 |
| 15-17 Years | 21 | 35% | 8 | 13.30% | 29 | ||
| 17-19 Years | 8 | 13% | 7 | 25% | 15 | ||
| 2. | School Performance | Good | 1 | 1.66% | 8 | 13.33% | 9 |
| Average | 24 | 40% | 8 | 13.33% | 32 | ||
| Poor | 17 | 28.33% | 2 | 3.33% | 19 | ||
| 3. | Religion | Hindu | 31 | 51.66% | 9 | 15% | 40 |
| Muslim | 1 | 1.66% | 0 | 0% | 1 | ||
| Christian | 7 | 11.66% | 8 | 11.66% | 15 | ||
| other | 3 | 5% | 1 | 1.66% | 4 | ||
| 4. | Gender | Girl | 15 | 25% | 8 | 11.66% | 23 |
| Boy | 26 | 43.33% | 11 | 18.33% | 37 | ||
| 5. | Types of Family | Nuclear Family | 24 | 40% | 11 | 18.33% | 35 |
| Joint Family | 18 | 30% | 7 | 11.66% | 25 | ||
| 6. | <Rs.15000 | 6 | 10% | 2 | 3.33% | 8 | |
| Rs.15001-25000 | 11 | 18.33% | 6 | 10% | 17 | ||
| Rs.25001-50000 | 18 | 30% | 7 | 11.60% | 25 | ||
| Monthly Income | >50000 | 7 | 11.66% | 3 | 5% | 10 | |
| 7. | Area of residence | Urban | 25 | 41.66% | 10 | 16.66% | 35 |
| Rural | 17 | 28.33% | 8 | 13.33% | 25 | ||
| 8. | Co-Curricular Activity | Sports | 28 | 83.33% | 5 | 8.33% | 30 |
| Yoga | 8 | 13.33% | 10 | 16.66% | 18 | ||
| Other | 9 | 15% | 3 | 5% | 12 |
Discussion:
The purpose of this research was to find out how assertiveness training improved the self-esteem of adolescents who participated in Visnagar School. On the first day, a pre-test was done, and the adolescents' level of self-esteem was assessed by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. From the day of the pre-test until the day of the post-test, assertiveness training with eight components - situation, respecting others, self-appreciation, appreciation of others, mirror talking, mirror acting exercise, self-improvement exercise, and storytelling was delivered. The mean post-test self-esteem score was 21.16, whereas the pre-test self-esteem score was 11.33; this variation in mean resulted from the assertiveness training interventions and was not by chance. This demonstrated that there was a substantial difference in the adolescents' self-esteem levels before and after taking the test. The results of the chi-square analysis indicated that it was related to the level of self-esteem at the post-test. The current study has been confirmed by Khansa Malik and Bince Varghese [10], who conducted a study on the impact of assertiveness training on adolescents' self-esteem in 2020. Our results were also in agreement with Parry (2017) [5]. An Indian Outlook found that the training had a positive impact on adolescents' self-esteem. The majority of the outcomes were in the pre-test. Following the test, the majority of subjects (68.33%) had excellent self-esteem, followed by 31.66% who had few problems with self-esteem and no one who fell into the categories of low and depressed self-esteem (61.66% had low self-esteem, 38.33% had no problems, and 31.66% experienced but not all problems) [10]. The present study findings were consistent [14], their results displayed that the assertiveness training on self-esteem and assertive behaviour among adolescents was rational and cost effective tactic. Another study [15,16] found that assertiveness training was successful (p 0.05) in raising self-esteem levels and enhancing assertive conduct in adolescent girls, and the results also show that it becomes better with time.
Conclusion:
Data shows that training in assertiveness was successful in raising adolescents' self-esteem. This is affordable and works well to boost self-esteem.
The authors declared no conceivable conflict of interest with respect to conducting and publication of this research.
Edited by P Kangueane
Citation: Mahalakshmi et al. Bioinformation 19(11):1086-1089(2023)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Baumeister RF, et al. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4:1. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.01431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stets JE, Burke P. J Sociological Perspectives. 2014;57:409. doi: 10.1177/0731121414536141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baldwin SA, et al. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2002;31:101. doi: 10.1023/A:1014065825598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Smelser NJ, Baltes PB. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) USA: Elsevier; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Parray WM, et al. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences. 2020;8:707. doi: 10.18510/hssr.2020.8185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shanmugam V, Kathyayini BV. Galore International Journal of Health Sciences and Research. 2017;2:8. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26332.13448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1908597.pdf .
- 8.Arias-Gomez J, et al. Rev Alerg Mex. 2016;63:201. doi: 10.29262/ram.v63i2.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Willie MM. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies. 2022;2:521. doi: 10.47191/ijmscrs/v2-i6-14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.10_Issue.7_July2020/9.pdf .
- 11.Mahalakshmi B, et al. Bioinformation. 2022;18:640. doi: 10.6026/97320630018640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sivasubramanian N, et al. Bioinformation. 2022;18:786. doi: 10.6026/97320630018786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. https://ori.hhs.gov/
- 14.Muragod SS. Int.J. Adv. Nur. Management. 2017;5:241. doi: 10.5958/2454-2652.2017.00052.X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rani S, et al. International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2016;2:25. doi: 10.5958/2395-180X.2016.00025.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mahalakshmi B, et al. Bioinformation. 2022;18:657. doi: 10.6026/97320630018657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
