Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Nov 20;19(11):e1011350. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011350

Oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 functions as a microglial survival factor during neuroinvasive flavivirus infection

Geoffrey T Norris 1, Joshua M Ames 1, Steven F Ziegler 1,2, Andrew Oberst 1,‡,*
Editor: Kellie A Jurado3
PMCID: PMC10695366  PMID: 37983247

Abstract

In order to recover from infection, organisms must balance robust immune responses to pathogens with the tolerance of immune-mediated pathology. This balance is particularly critical within the central nervous system, whose complex architecture, essential function, and limited capacity for self-renewal render it susceptible to both pathogen- and immune-mediated pathology. Here, we identify the alarmin IL-33 and its receptor ST2 as critical for host survival to neuroinvasive flavivirus infection. We identify oligodendrocytes as the critical source of IL-33, and microglia as the key cellular responders. Notably, we find that the IL-33/ST2 axis does not impact viral control or adaptive immune responses; rather, it is required to promote the activation and survival of microglia. In the absence of intact IL-33/ST2 signaling in the brain, neuroinvasive flavivirus infection triggered aberrant recruitment of monocyte-derived peripheral immune cells, increased neuronal stress, and neuronal cell death, effects that compromised organismal survival. These findings identify IL-33 as a critical mediator of CNS tolerance to pathogen-initiated immunity and inflammation.

Author summary

West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-transmitted virus that can infect the central nervous system (CNS), causing severe encephalitis, long-term cognitive and motor disfunction, and death. This study identifies a mechanism by which WNV infection promotes microglial and host survival independent of viral restriction. Using mouse models, we identify the alarmin IL-33 as a molecule released from dying oligodendrocytes to activate microglia following WNV infection, and we find that mice lacking IL-33 or its receptor ST2 succumb to WNV CNS infection more readily than wild-type controls. Surprisingly, mice lacking IL-33 or ST2 did not show defects in adaptive immune responses or viral clearance. Rather, their increased susceptibility to WNV was characterized by a failure of brain macrophage survival and activation, increased neuronal stress, and increased cell death within the CNS. These findings suggest that IL-33/ST2 signaling promotes disease tolerance to safeguard CNS function during neuroinvasive WNV infection.

Introduction

Immune responses within the central nervous system (CNS) must both clear pathogens and avoid immune-mediated damage to the complex neuronal architecture that makes up this organ system. As the resident cells immune cells of the CNS, microglia are ideally positioned to mediate both pathogen elimination and tissue preservation. Microglia are long-lived tissue resident macrophages unique in their origin entirely from embryonic yolk sac progenitors with no contribution from other hematopoietic compartments, barring significant CNS disease [1]. Recent advances have described multiple roles for microglia in both CNS homeostasis and upon its perturbation [2,3]. Recent studies have also revealed mechanisms of microglial function during CNS viral infection [4], where microglia have been shown to contain infection and tissue damage during acute infection, while mediating neuronal and tissue damage if aberrantly activated during recovery. These findings highlight the pleotropic nature of microglial functions in the CNS, and point to a need to better understand the signals that promote the distinct roles of this cell type.

The cytokine IL-33 is a member of the IL-1 family of alarmin cytokines. IL-33 is normally released by damaged or necrotic cells, signaling in a paracrine manner to bystanders expressing the IL-33 receptor ST2 (encoded by Il1rl1). IL-33/ST2 signaling has divergent roles in peripheral immune responses, notably contributing to both immune cell activation and tissue homeostasis, including roles in promoting macrophage survival [5]. Notably, IL-33 is highly expressed the CNS, and several roles for IL-33 in CNS development and pathology have been identified, including promotion of synaptic pruning and extracellular matrix remodeling by microglia [6,7], and promotion of recovery from spinal cord injury through macrophage signaling [8]. IL-33 signaling has also been identified as a driver of both protective and detrimental CNS immune responses to Toxoplasma gondii (where astrocytes are the primary responder to IL-33 signaling), malaria, Dengue, and Rocio viruses [913]. Therefore, the contribution of IL-33 to beneficial or pathogenic responses to viral infection deserves further characterization.

Since its arrival in the Western Hemisphere, the flavivirus West Nile virus (WNV) has become a significant threat to public health, with the majority of disease burden resulting from neuroinvasive infection [1416]. Recent studies using an attenuated strain of West Nile virus, termed WNV-E218A, as well as a less neurovirulent form of the related Zika virus (ZIKV-Dakar), have shown bivalent roles for resident microglia in promoting neurological pathology and cognitive sequelae to flavivirus infection, while also contributing to host survival during acute infection. [1720]. Specifically, during chronic infection microglia were shown to be detrimental, phagocytosing neuronal processes in the murine hippocampus, a phenomenon underlying disease sequelae specific to episodic-spatial memory [21]. However, pharmacological removal of microglia yielded decreased host and neuronal survival, with minimal changes in viral titer [20], suggesting that microglia play beneficial roles in host survival during neuroinvasive viral infection.

In this study, we show that IL-33 signaling promotes survival during flavivirus infection, an effect apparently independent of a role for IL-33 in viral control. We found that following CNS infection IL-33+ oligodendrocytes are lost, and that IL-33 expression by oligodendrocytes is necessary for host survival, implicating a release of IL-33 from dying oligodendrocytes as the source of this alarmin. The target of IL-33 signaling was primarily microglia, as mice with specific deletion of ST2 on microglia succumbed more readily to CNS disease. In the absence of IL-33 signaling post-infection, we found defects in microglial activation and survival, leading to enhanced BBB breakdown, increased monocyte extravasation and neuronal apoptosis. Together, our studies reveal a source for CNS IL-33 during flavivirus infection and highlight its role in promoting microglial fitness in this setting. These findings suggest that IL-33 signaling is required for CNS tolerance to the inflammatory response triggered by neuroinvasive flavivirus infection.

Results

IL-33/ST2 signaling promotes host survival upon neuroinvasive flavivirus infection

We sought to assess the role of IL-33 and its receptor ST2 in controlling the CNS pathogenesis of flavivirus infection. In order to isolate roles for IL-33 and ST2 within the CNS, we used an established model of intracranial infection with an attenuated form of WNV (WNV-E218A), a model in which most wild-type mice survive infection but display CNS pathology and sequelae [17,22] (S1A Fig). To study the role of the IL-33/ST2 pathway in these infection models, we infected Il1rl1–/–, Il33–/–, and wild type congenic animals with WNV-E218, then monitored their survival. While ~75% of wild type animals survived infection, both Il1rl1–/–and Il33–/–mice were significantly more susceptible to WNV-E218A infection, displaying reduced survival and enhanced weight loss (Figs 1A and S1B). We reasoned that this increase in susceptibility could be due to a failure to control viral replication within the CNS. To test this, we titered virus from the cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, brainstem, and peripheral organs of Il1rl1–/–, Il33–/–, and B6/J infected mice at 7 days post-infection (DPI), a timepoint corresponding to peak disease [17]. While no virus was detected in the periphery of these animals, only the cortex exhibited varying degrees of infectious virus titer (Fig 1B). Surprisingly, Il33–/–animals displayed lower levels of viral titers in this brain region compared to controls while Il1rl1–/–titers were higher than WT. No differences in viral titer were seen in other CNS regions.

Fig 1. The IL-33 pathway promotes survival upon neuroinvasive flavivirus infection, independent of viral control.

Fig 1

(A) Survival analysis in Il33–/–, Il1rl1–/–, and B6/J mice following intracranial infection with 2e4 PFU WNV-E218A. (B) WNV-E218A Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 7 days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. (C) Survival analysis in Il33–/–, Il1rl1–/–, and B6/J mice following intracranial infection of 1e6 PFU ZIKV-Dakar. (D) ZIKV-Dakar Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 7 days post-infection via plaque assay on Vero cells. (E) WNV-E218A Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 4 days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. (F) WNV-E218A Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 14 days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. Data are representative of 3 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (A, C) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test) (B, D, E) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons).

To assess broader roles for the IL-33/ST2 axis in flavivirus control, we tested the effects of IL-33 and ST2 deletion with a wild-type isolate of the related flavivirus Zika virus, termed ZIKV-Dakar. While intracranial infection of congenic WT animals yielded ~90% survival, Il1rl1–/–mice were significantly more susceptible to infection with survivorship at ~70%. Il33–/–mice had a further decrease in survivorship to both congenic controls and Il1rl1–/–mice at ~30% with both genotypes showing increased weight loss (Figs 1C and S1C). Upon examination of viral titers from the tissues of these animals we observed that, similarly to WNV-E218A infection, no virus was detected in peripheral tissues (Fig 1D). Within the CNS only the brainstem showed differences in viral titer upon loss of IL-33/ST2 signaling upon ZIKV-Dakar infection, with Il1rl1–/–mice showing lower levels of infectious virus than either WT or Il33–/–animals (Fig 1D). WNV-E218A titers post-peak infection (10 DPI) in Il1r1l–/–and congenic controls only showed elevated titers in the cerebellum, with all other brain regions having cleared virus (S1D Fig). We also assessed the role of IL-33/ST2 signaling in models of peripheral flavivirus infection, and observed increased mortality and weight loss in Il1rl1–/–mice (S1E and S1F Fig). Further, titering infected tissues of these mice showed no statistically significant differences in CNS or peripheral organ viral titer (S1G Fig). Since the cerebellum of Il1r1l–/–mice showed an increase in viral titer (S1D Fig), and to assess the effect of IL-33 on CNS viral restriction over time we intracranially infected Il33–/–and congenic controls with WNV-E218A, and collected CNS and peripheral tissues at early or late timepoints, corresponding to day 4 (Fig 1E) and 14 (Fig 1F) post-infection, respectively. Four days post-infection, we observed limited viral titers across brain regions, while by 14 days post-infection virus had been uniformly cleared, with only very modest viral titers observed in the cortex. At neither timepoint were significant differences in viral titer observed between wild-type and Il33-/- mice. Collectively these results suggest that the IL-33/ST2 signaling pathway is important for host survival upon neuroinvasive WNV infection, but that this activity is independent of a role in controlling viral replication or dissemination.

Oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 promotes survival upon neuroinvasive WNV infection

Since our studies of knockout mice suggested a role for IL-33 in promoting survival to neuroinvasive flavivirus infection, we next sought to assess the CNS cell source of IL-33 in this setting. We first analyzed the expression and localization of IL-33 in the uninfected CNS and found that IL-33 was exclusively expressed in either cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage (Olig2+) or astrocytes (GFAP+) in concordance with prior studies[8,12] (Fig 2A). Since IL-33 signaling is associated with its release from dying cells, the loss of IL-33+ cells has been used as a surrogate for IL-33 activity [8,12]. To examine the release of IL-33 by Olig2 or GFAP-expressing cells, we intracranially infected C57Bl6/J mice with WNV-E218A and sacrificed animals during peak CNS disease at 7 DPI, preserving their brains for IHC analysis. Examining hippocampal sub region CA3, an area receiving myelination from septal GABAergic neurons[23,24] and known for synaptic stripping and inflammation during WNV-E218A infection, we observed a loss of both IL-33+ astrocytes (GFAP+) and IL-33+ oligodendrocyte-lineage cells (Olig2+) 7 days post-infection (Fig 2B and 2C).

Fig 2. Oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 promotes survival to neurotropic flavivirus infection.

Fig 2

(A) Ratios of IL-33+ cells in indicated brain regions in adult B6/J mice with HBSS injection. (B) Representative immunofluorescent images of IL-33+ cell loss in B6/J Hippocampal CA3 7 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). Arrowheads indicate IL-33+Olig2+ and arrows IL-33+GFAP+ cells. (C) Quantification of IL-33 positivity in Olig2+ and GFAP+ in B6/J Hippocampal CA3 7 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (D) Representative images of MBP+IL-33+ cell loss in hippocampal CA3 10 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (E) Quantification of MBP+IL-33+ cell number and MPB mean fluorescent intensity in Hippocampal CA3 10 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (F) Survival analysis of mice with oligodendrocyte-specific deletion of IL-33 following intracranial infection of 2e4 PFU WNV-E218A. (G) WNV-E218A Viral titers from indicated tissues of mice 7 days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. (A-E) Data are representative of two independent experiments. (F) Data are representative of 3 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (C and E) two-tailed student’s T test (F) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

Since IL-33 release is classically associated with cell death we next quantified the number of both astrocytes and oligodendrocytes post-infection. While total GFAP+ astrocyte numbers were stable (S2A Fig), IL-33+ mature-myelinating oligodendrocyte cell numbers (MBP+IL-33+) and overall MBP staining were decreased post-infection (Fig 2D and 2E). Given the loss of MBP+IL-33+ oligodendrocytes in regions of known synaptic stripping as well as previous studies that have shown oligodendrocyte cell death upon flavivirus infection in vitro and in vivo[2527], we hypothesized that oligodendrocytes represented a probable source of released IL-33 following neuroinvasive WNV infection. To test this, we crossed Plp1ERT2Cre/+ mice with Il33fl/fl animals to generate mice lacking IL-33 in oligodendrocytes. We first confirmed that tamoxifen treatment induced the excision of IL-33 from Olig2+ cells without impacting total Olig2+ cell number (S2B and S2C Fig). We next intracranially infected tamoxifen-treated Plp1ERT2Cre/+::Il33fl/fl mice, as well as Cre-negative littermates, with WNV-E218A. Strikingly, Cre+ animals exhibited a phenotype closely matching that of global IL-33 deficient animals, with compromised survival (Fig 2F) but no differences in viral titer between genotypes at 7 DPI (Fig 2G). Collectively, these data indicate that oligodendrocyte loss is widespread following CNS WNV infection, and that oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 promotes host survival independently of viral restriction.

The IL-33/ST2 signaling axis promotes survival independent of adaptive immunity during neuroinvasive flavivirus infection

To assess whether loss of virologic control may occur at sites of adaptive immune activation in the absence of IL-33 signaling we assessed viral titer in the deep cervical lymph nodes (DCLNs) of Il33–/–mice and congenic controls at early (4 DPI) and late (14 DPI) stages post WNV-E218A intracranial infection. Though the DCLNs have been implicated in T cell activation following CNS infection[28,29], we observed no titerable virus at these timepoints (Fig 3A).

Fig 3. IL-33/ST2 signaling on adaptive immune cells does not impact host survival following intracranial flavivirus infection.

Fig 3

(A) WNV-E218A Viral titers from DCLNs of mice 4- and 14-days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. (B) Cell number and CD44/CD69 gMFI of indicated adaptive immune cell types per ½ brain by FACs 7 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (C) Cell number and CD44/CD69 gMFI of indicated adaptive immune cell types per ½ brain by FACs 7 days post intracranial infection with ZIKV-Dakar. (D) Cell number and CD44/CD69 gMFI of indicated adaptive immune cell types per ½ brain by FACs 14 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (E) Percent ST2+ and ST2 gMFI of indicated immune cell types 7 days post vehicle injection. (F) Percent ST2+ and ST2 gMFI of immune cells 7 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (G) Survival analysis of mice with Treg deletion of ST2 following intracranial ZIKV-Dakar infection. Data are representative of 2 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (A, B) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons) (C, D) (One-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons). (E) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). Data are representative of 2 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B, D, G, J, H, L) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons) (C, K) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test) (I) (Student’s two-tailed t Test).

Despite this, the IL-33/ST2 signaling pathway has well-defined roles in T cell activation during viral infection, with CD8+ [30], CD4+ [31], and Treg cells [32] implicated. Notably, these three adaptive immune cell types are all critical for WNV host defense [33,34]. We therefore wondered if the survival defect observed in Il33-/- or Il1rl1-/- mice upon neuroinvasive flavivirus infection was due to altered T cell recruitment or activation. To examine this, we infected both WT and Il33–/–mice intracranially with WNV-E218A or ZIKV-Dakar and sacrificed each at 7 days post-infection, removing and processing the brain parenchyma for examination of T cell responses by flow cytometry. Remarkably, there was no change in the number or expression of activation markers (CD44 and CD69) on adaptive effector cells in response to WNV-E218A in Il33–/–animals (Fig 3B). While there was a modest increase in overall T cell number with ZIKV-Dakar infection in Il33–/–mice, no differences in Tconv, Treg, or CD8 T cells were seen in Il33–/–animals with ZIKV-Dakar infection, with MFIs of CD44 and CD69 unchanged in Tconv and CD8 T cells (Fig 3C). T cell responses remained unchanged in Il33–/–mice 14 DPI with WNV-E218A with no difference in either cell number or expression of effector markers (Fig 3D). Given the essential role of CD8 T cells in CNS protection during WT WNV peripheral infection [35], we sought to functionally test their role by depleting CD8 T cells from WT animals and infecting both control and CD8 T cell-depleted mice with WNV-E218A to monitor survival (S3A Fig). Despite robust CD8 T cell depletion, especially among NS4b+ CD8 T cells specific to WNV (S3B Fig), no change in survival or weight loss was observed, in contrast to effects of CD8 depletion following peripheral WNV infection [35] (S3C and S3D Fig).

To further assess a role for IL-33/ST2 signaling in adaptive immunity, we sought to define which leukocyte subsets express ST2 during infection. To do this, we analyzed both mock and WNV-E218A infected WT mice by flow cytometry at 7 DPI to investigate ST2 expression on CNS immune cells (S3E Fig). While HBSS-injected animals showed highest ST2 expression on CD8+ and CD4+ T cells (Fig 3E), during infection we observed the highest proportion of ST2+ cells among Tregs (~8%), followed by Tconv (~2%), and CD45+Non-LymphoidCD11b- cells (~1%); the latter likely representing meningeal innate lymphoid type 2 cells (ILC2s) which are known to express ST2 [36] and exhibited the highest levels of ST2 by MFI (Figs 3F and S3F). As Tregs are known to be critical for host survival following WNV infection and exhibited the highest proportion of ST2 positivity by any of the examined leukocytes (Figs 3F and S3F) we tested whether lack of IL-33/ST2 signaling on Treg cells contributed to the observed survival defects following neuroinvasive flavivirus infection. To assess this, we crossed Foxp3ERT2Cre+/y mice with Il1rl1fl/fl animals, to delete ST2 on FOXP3-expressing Treg cells. After confirming that ST2 expression was deleted on both splenic and tissue Tregs prior to infection (S3G Fig) we intracranially infected mice with both intact (Foxp3Ert2Cre+/y:: Il1rl1fl/+) and deleted (Foxp3Ert2Cre+/y:: Il1rl1fl/fl) Treg ST2 with ZIKV-Dakar. Despite effective ST2 deletion on Tregs we observed no difference in survival (Fig 3G) or weight loss (S3H Fig) between groups, indicating that Treg expression of ST2 is dispensable for CNS flavivirus defense. As an alternative approach to assess a role for Tregs in survival following neuroinvasive WNV infection, we boosted the number and reactivity of Tregs via administration of IL-2 complexes [37] following CNS infection of WNV-E218A. While both the number of Tregs and expression of effector proteins CD25 and GITR were increased in circulation 9 DPI (S3I and S3J Fig), no effect of survival or weight loss to WNV-E218A infection was observed in response to IL-2 complex administration (S3K and S3L Fig). Collectively, these data suggest that while ST2 expression is prominent on adaptive immune cells during peak CNS disease, signaling via the IL-33/ST2 axis on adaptive immune cells is dispensable for direct CNS immune responses to flaviviruses.

IL-33 signaling is required for normal microglial activation following neuroinvasive WNV infection

We next sought to identify an effector cell population for the IL-33/ST2 axis during CNS flavivirus infection. Given our negative findings regarding roles for lymphocytes in this process, as well as recent work highlighting a role for IL-33 signaling in microglial activation [6,7,38] we sought next to characterize the role of IL-33 on microglial activation following intracranial WNV-E218A infection. Due to the difficulty of discriminating microglia versus infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages we assessed the stability of the microglial-specific marker TMEM119[39] post-infection. While TMEM119 was expressed on nearly all cells expressing the pan-macrophage marker Iba1[40] 10 days post vehicle injection, only ~20% of Iba1+ cells expressed TMEM119 10 days post WNV-E218A infection (Fig 4A) indicating either a loss of TMEM119 expression by resident microglia or an influx of TMEM119- monocyte-derived macrophages.

Fig 4. IL-33/ST2 signaling is necessary for microglial activation and host defense following CNS flavivirus infection.

Fig 4

(A) Representative immunofluorescent images and quantification of microglial TMEM119 loss in hippocampal CA3 post WNV-E218A infection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (B) Representative images and (C) Quantification of Iba1 MFI and Iba1+phospho-p38+CD68+ brain macrophage number post intracranial WNV-E218A infection. (D) Representative immunofluorescent images of Iba1+ brain macrophages in B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (E) Quantification of Iba1 by MFI in indicated brain regions of B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A. (F) Survival analysis of mice with microglial-specific deletion of ST2 following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. Data are representative of 2 and 3 (E) pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B, D) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons and Pearson’s Correlation) (E) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

The marker phopsho-p38 has been shown to be acutely expressed by ST2+ adaptive immune cells following IL-33 exposure both in vivo and in vitro [30,31,41]. To examine expression of phospho-p38 in activated brain macrophages post WNV-E218A infection we stained 10 DPI CNS tissue for phospho-p38, the pan-macrophage marker Iba1, and the phagolysosomal marker CD68, a marker expressed highly on brain macrophages during WNV-induced synaptic stripping [17]. Comparing CA3 tissue from Il1r1l–/–and congenic control mice we observed reduced brain macrophage activation quantified both by Iba1 MFI and Iba1+CD68+phospho-p38+ brain macrophage number 10 DPI (Fig 4B and 4C).

These data suggested that IL-33/ST2 signaling may drive microglia activation following WNV infection. We next examined brain macrophage activation more broadly by examining Iba1 MFI in regions of known WNV infectivity in both WT and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 DPI with WNV-E218A. Iba1 MFI was reduced in CA3, deep cerebellar nuclei (DCN), and cortex of Il1rl1–/–mice compared to congenic controls (Fig 4D and 4E). Importantly, mock-infected Il1rl1–/–mice did not show decreased Iba1+ cell number, indicating no baseline effect of IL-33 on promoting microglia number (S4A and S4B Fig) Despite its reported role in synaptic stripping by activated microglia in diverse CNS pathologies [42], complement deposition of C1q protein at 7DPI was not affected by the absence of IL-33 during infection (S4C and S4D Fig).

To directly test whether the loss of IL-33/ST2 signaling on microglia, and resulting impairment in activation, was responsible for the increased susceptibility to WNV infection we previously observed in IL-33- and ST2-deficient mice, we crossed Cx3cr1Ert2Cre mice with Il1rl1fl/fl animals. In resulting Cx3cr1Ert2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl animals, tamoxifen administration causes ST2 excision in all CX3CR1-expressing cells, including tissue resident macrophages in both the CNS and periphery. However, we used a previously-defined strategy of administering tamoxifen, then resting mice for one month to allow turnover of peripheral, but not brain-resident, macrophage population [43]. While activated T cells have also been shown to express CX3CR1, no T cell labeling via this strategy has been observed [43,44]. We first confirmed microglial ST2 excision in naïve mice one-month post tamoxifen treatment by MAC sorting whole brain homogenate with CD11b beads and subsequent RT-PCR. After first confirming purity of our samples by flow cytometry (S4E and S4F Fig), we observed downregulation of the ST2 receptor only in Cx3cr1Ert2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl sorted microglia by RT-PCR (S4G Fig). Next, we infected tamoxifen-treated Cx3cr1Ert2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl and Cx3cr1+/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl animals one-month post-tamoxifen treatment intracranially with WNV-E218A and monitored their survival. While animals with intact ST2 signaling on microglia survived at rates comparable to WT animals, Cx3cr1ERT2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl mice displayed significantly increased mortality (Fig 4F) and weight loss (S4H Fig), comparable to that observed when this infection model was applied to mice globally lacking ST2 or IL-33 (Fig 1A). A recent study identified ST2 expression on peripheral sensory neurons in the context of sterile skin injury [45]. To test whether neuronal ST2 expression contributed to our phenotypes we crossed Camk2aCre/+ mice with Il1rl1fl/fl mice generating mice with intact (Camk2a+/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl) and deficient (Camk2aCre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl) neuronal ST2 signaling. Upon WNV-E218A infection no change in survival (S4I Fig) or weight loss (S4J Fig) was seen. Together, these findings support the idea that ST2 expression on microglia is responsible for both macrophage activation and host survival in response to WNV infection.

Brain macrophages from Il33–/–mice exhibit enhanced inflammatory and stress responses post-infection

Due to a loss of microglial markers post-infection (Fig 4A) and a requirement for ST2 expression on microglia to support host survival (Fig 4F) we sought to identify the transcriptional programs initiated by IL-33 on brain macrophages in total post-infection. We first isolated hippocampal brain macrophages (including both microglia and recruited peripheral monocyte-derived macrophages) using F4/80 mediated MACS from WT and Il33–/–mice 7 days after intracranial WNV-E218A infection and processed them for RNA sequencing. (Fig 5A). Before sequencing, MAC-sorted sample purity was determined by flow cytometry (S5A–S5C Fig). Following RNAseq analysis, we first performed principal component analysis and observed clustering of samples by both genotype and infection status (Fig 5B). Analysis of RNAseq datasets revealed 251 significantly differentially expressed genes when comparing B6/J and IL-33 deficient macrophages during infection (Fig 5C). Additionally, and consistent with previous reports, we observed a number of differentially expressed genes in vehicle-treated IL-33-deficient animals relative to wild-type controls, consistent with homeostatic roles for IL-33 [38] (S5D and S5E Fig). We next performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) using Hallmark gene sets that may be differentially expressed during infection. While the top gene sets enriched in IL-33-deficient cells relative to wild-type during infection (Fig 5D) included predictable dysregulation of inflammatory processes (S5F Fig), we were surprised to observe a number of cell metabolism and stress gene sets enriched including: Fatty Acid Metabolism (S5G Fig), Oxidative Phosphorylation (S5H Fig), Hypoxia (S5I Fig) and Apoptosis (S5J Fig). Despite evidence of loss of the microglial marker TMEM119 at the protein level (Fig 4A), no changes to microglial homeostatic signature genes associated with genotype aside from C1qb were detected in vehicle or virus-infected brain macrophages (Fig 5E). Still, this does not discount the possibility of bone-marrow derived macrophages in our samples. Collectively, these data point to a dysregulation of brain macrophage activation following WNV-E218A infection in Il33–/–mice typified by altered metabolic state and upregulation of cell stress pathways, including apoptosis.

Fig 5. Il33–/–hippocampal macrophages exhibit enhanced inflammatory and cell stress responses acutely during CNS WNV infection.

Fig 5

(A) Scheme of hippocampal macrophage isolation and RNAsequencing following intracranial WNV-E218A infection of B6/J and Il33–/–mice. Created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO. (B) Principal Component Analysis of RNAseq samples. (C) Volcano plot showing differential gene expression in Il33–/–vs. B6/J hippocampal macrophages post-infection with WNV-E218A. (D) Top 20 Hallmark gene sets enriched in Il33–/–relative to B6/J hippocampal macrophages post-infection with WNV-E218A. (E) Microglial homeostatic signature genes in hippocampal microglia isolated post-vehicle and infection with WNV-E218A. ** p < 0.01 (E) 2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons.

IL-33 functions as a microglial survival factor limiting CNS pathology following WNV infection

Previous studies have shown a role for IL-33 in the metabolic support of macrophage survival [5,38]. Since we observed a lack of macrophage activation and hypertrophy in ST2-deficient mice (Fig 4B–4E), as well as upregulated cell stress pathways in brain macrophages isolated from Il33–/–mice (Fig 5D), we hypothesized that brain macrophage viability may be impacted subsequent to intracranial WNV-E218A delivery in the absence of IL-33/ST2 signaling. To quantify this, we examined brain macrophage (CD11b+F4/80+) viability in Il1rl1–/–mice post-infection by flow cytometry. Looking 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A we observed that in whole brain samples, macrophages, but not other infiltrating leukocyte populations exhibited higher proportions of cell death as quantified by the viability dye ZombieNIR (Fig 6A). To elucidate the extent of this phenotype we also analyzed Il33–/–mice and congenic controls at 14 DPI with WNV-E218A, and again found that only brain macrophage populations showed enhanced ZombieNIR positivity (S6A Fig). Examination of innate immune cell counts by flow cytometry at 14 DPI also showed decreased numbers of brain myeloid cells and brain macrophages, consistent with enhanced cell death in these populations (S6B Fig). To confirm this finding, we next performed IHC on B6/J and Il33–/–mice infected with WNV-E218A at 7 days post infection, using the macrophage marker Iba1 and terminal apoptotic marker cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3). We observed increased macrophage apoptosis in the CA3 of Il33–/–mice with WNV-E218A infection (Fig 6B and 6C) and also in hippocampal CA1 7 DPI with ZIKV-Dakar (S6C and S6D Fig).

Fig 6. Disruption of IL-33 signaling during CNS WNV infection induces brain macrophage apoptosis and neuronal pathology.

Fig 6

(A) %ZombieNIR+ dying cell populations of indicated type by FACs analysis of brain homogenates 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A in B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice. (B) Representative images of CC3+ CA3 hippocampal brain macrophages 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A in B6/J and Il33–/–mice (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). Arrowheads indicate Iba1-CC3+ while arrows indicate Iba1+CC3+ cells. (C) Quantification of CC3+ CA3 hippocampal brain macrophages. (D) Quantification of monocyte count by FACs analysis of brain homogenates in B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post WNV-E218A infection. (E) Representative images of monocyte engraftment in hippocampal CA3 and cerebellum of B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post WNV-E218A infection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). Arrowheads indicate Iba1-CD68+ cells. (F) Quantification of CD68+Iba1- monocytes in hippocampal CA3 and cerebellum. (G) Representative images of pCJun+ cells and IgG deposition in hippocampal CA3 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A in B6/J and Il33–/–mice (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). Arrowheads indicated pCJun+ cells. (H) Quantification of pCJun+ cells and IgG MFI. (I) Representative images of pCJun+ projections and GFAP+ cells hippocampal CA3 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A in B6/J and Il33–/–mice (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (J) Quantification of GFAP+ area and pCJun+ projection area. (K) Representative images of CC3+ neurons in hippocampal CA3 and cerebellum of B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post WNV-E218A infection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). Arrowheads indicate NeuN+CC3+ cells. (L) Quantification of CC3+ neuron number in CA3 and cerebellum. Data are representative of 2 (A-F) independent and 2 (K-L) pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (A, C, H) (two-tailed T test) (E, G, J, L) (Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons).

A key driver of pathology in neuroinvasive WNV disease is the entry of peripheral monocytes to the CNS [4648]. Given the blunted activation and enhanced apoptosis observed in resident microglia in the absence of IL-33/ST2 signaling, we wondered if peripheral monocytes would be recruited in greater numbers in these animals to compensate for—or in response to—dysregulated microglial responses. To assess this, we examined the number of brain-engrafted monocytes in B6/J and Il1rl1–/–by flow cytometry following intracranial WNV-E218A infection and observed a marked increase in the number of monocytes in whole brain homogenates at 7DPI (Fig 6D). Enhanced monocyte engraftment post-infection was also corroborated by quantifying CD68+Iba1- cells in CA3 and cerebellum of B6/J and Il33–/–mice at 7DPI by immunohistochemistry of infected brain tissue (Fig 6E and 6F)

Given the strong phenotypes seen with both global and microglial deletion of IL-33 signaling on host and brain macrophage survival, we next sought to examine CNS pathologic processes that may underlie host demise. To examine neuronal pathology we stained hippocampal region CA3 and cerebellum in both B6/J and Il33–/–mice infected with WNV-E218A using antibodies against the neuronal distress marker phospho-c-Jun [49] and endogenous mouse IgG to mark blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage. Strikingly, we saw an increase in CA3 IgG deposition and phospho-c-Jun+ cells in both areas of Il1rl1–/–animals (Fig 6G and 6H). To confirm a vascular origin of IgG we also stained vehicle and WNV-infected B6/J brain tissue with laminin and anti-mouse IgG, observing only intravascular IgG with vehicle treatment, and IgG tissue deposition only with infection (S6E Fig). We also observed an increased MFI for the astrocyte activation marker GFAP in CA3 and cerebellum, as well as increased phospho-c-Jun expression in mossy fibers of CA3 of Il1rl1–/–animals, an early phenotype of neurodegeneration observed in many models of CNS pathology [50] (Fig 6I and 6J). Collectively these data are consistent with a state of increased monocyte ingress and vascular leak, neuronal distress, and astrocyte hyperactivity in Il33–/–mice following flavivirus infection.

Lastly, we examined apoptotic neurons in hippocampal CA3 and cerebellum by quantifying cleaved-caspase 3 positive NeuN expressing cells and found increased neuronal apoptosis in Il33–/–mice at 7 DPI in both regions (Fig 6K and 6L). Together, these data suggest that IL-33/ST2 signaling is required during intracranial flavivirus infection to promote microglial viability and prevention of CNS pathology. Our findings indicate that in the absence of IL-33 signaling, flavivirus infection leads to brain macrophage apoptosis, ingress of pathogenic peripheral monocyte-derived cells to the CNS, neuronal distress, astrocyte hyperactivity, and subsequent enhanced neuronal apoptosis and host demise.

Discussion

This study defines IL-33 as an oligodendrocyte-derived survival factor for microglia, and suggests that IL-33 is required during viral infection to promote normal microglial activation. In its absence, we observed wide-ranging defects in neuronal survival, blood-brain barrier integrity, and peripheral monocyte infiltration, culminating in reduced host survival. While the work detailed here does not define a mechanism for oligodendrocyte release of IL-33, previous studies have demonstrated profound WNV-induced death of oligodendrocytes in vitro, [25], from cultured explants [26], and in vivo during peripheral infection [27]. While these studies mainly indicated apoptotic death of oligodendrocytes, other works have shown that oligodendrocytes express low levels of caspase 8 [51], a mediator of death-receptor induced apoptosis, and that TNF is a robust inducer of oligodendrocyte necrosis/necroptosis [52], implying that oligodendrocytes may be poised for pro-inflammatory cell death, especially during viral infection. These data, in addition to the finding that IL-33 reactivity is reduced, but not eliminated, by caspase 7 during apoptosis [53] suggests that oligodendrocytes may undergo non-apoptotic cell death to release IL-33 during neurotropic viral infection. Importantly, we also observe a reduction in GFAP+IL-33+ cells post-infection, and while our genetic studies support a role for oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 in this setting, our work does not formally rule out a contribution of IL-33 derived from astrocytes in this model.

Our work also indicates that IL-33 signaling on adaptive immune populations does little to affect survival at least in direct intracranial infection of flaviviruses. This is despite our observation that ST2 expression was most widely seen on adaptive immune populations at either resting state or during peak infection. This may be attributable to reports that ST2 expression on various immune cells is very short-lived, as in the case of splenic CD8 T cells in LCMV infection [30], or can shift in response to inflammatory context such as its upregulation on macrophages and Natural Killer cells with decreased ST2 expression on ILC2s in models of airway smoke exposure [54]. Despite observing limited ST2 expression on microglia, ST2 deletion on microglial cells did impact survival phenotypes in a manner similar to germline knockout of ST2. Still, future studies may need to employ multiple timepoints, possibly on an hourly timescale, to detect ST2 expression by protein on microglia. We also acknowledge that the requirement for ST2 signaling on adaptive immune cells may be different in models in which flavivirus neuroinvasion occurs following peripheral infection, rather than via direct intracranial inoculation.

While our studies observed enhanced expression of inflammatory and cell stress gene sets on microglial populations in response to WNV infection, we were technically limited in our sorting of F4/80+ cells, which at 7 DPI include both microglia and engrafted monocyte-derived macrophages. Future experiments delineating resident microglia via genetic fate-mapping and crossing to appropriate knockout strains may be required, as no definitive microglial marker separating these cell types in disease states currently exists.

Notably, the effect of IL-33 on host defense was not due to a failure of viral clearance, as mice deficient in IL-33 signaling had equivalent viral titers at peak disease timepoints and those that survived acute infection eventually cleared virus from CNS tissues. Previous data have indicated a requirement for microglia in CNS WNV infection, with deletion pharmacologically [20] or genetically [22] yielding decreased host survival. However, the CNS of mice with pharmacologic microglial depletion also showed higher levels of infectious virus and a blunted adaptive immune response, contrary to what was observed here. This suggests that IL-33 signaling may drive a subset of microglial functions related to survival and disease tolerance in the context of viral infection, and that in its absence microglia may still participate in viral control. There may also be differences between genetic and pharmacological depletion of microglia, as WNV-E218A infection of microglia-deficient Il34–/–mice revealed decreased neuronal and host survival with no change to CNS viral titer [22], similar to our data.

While the presence of brain macrophages within the virally-infected CNS is clearly beneficial for host and neuronal survival, how are these cells providing their neuroprotective effect independent of effects on viral titer? The provision of secreted factors to neurons directly or through supporting cells is one obvious possibility. Both TGF-β and IGF-1 have been shown to be secreted by microglia during spinal cord injury and observed to promote neuronal survival at the injury site [55]. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, which is secreted by microglia in response to bacterial infection [56] may also be responsible for tuning the CNS inflammatory milieu and ensuring neuroprotection. Another possibility is microglial secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) which is elicited by microglia during models of nerve injury and alters neuronal activity [57]. Microglial neuroprotection may also be mediated by synaptic stripping, preventing aberrant neuronal activity at sites of infection from “spillover” to otherwise healthy neuronal tissue.

IL-33 has recently emerged as a critical factor mediating macrophage survival in multiple settings. For example, IL-33 signaling was shown to promote survival in red pulp macrophage development [5] as well as altering microglial metabolic functioning [38]. Our findings join other recent studies implicating IL-33 signaling on microglia as essential to tune CNS function during development [6] and in adulthood [7]. In implicating IL-33 as a promoter of microglia-mediated disease tolerance (rather than a driver of viral clearance [58,59]) our findings highlight the pleotropic functions of microglia in both homeostasis and disease. Our work also suggests that potentiating IL-33 signaling in the CNS could ameliorate pathology and sequelae associated with neurotropic flavivirus infection.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Studies were carried out under the supervision and approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Washington, protocol number 4298–01 (PI: AO).

Mice

B6/J (000664), Il33fl/fl (030619) Cx3cr1ERT2Cre/ ERT2Cre (020940), Plp1ERT2Cre/ERT2Cre (005975), Aldh1l1ERT2cre/ ERT2cre (029655), and Camk2aCre/Cre (005359) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. C57BL/6J (B6/J) controls were either obtained commercially (Jackson Laboratories) or, for control animals in experiments using transgenic mouse strains, WT mice were bred in-house. Il33–/–(Originally from Dirk Smith at Amgen) and Foxp3ERT2Cre/y (PMID: 18387831):: Il1rl1fl/fl mice were obtained from the Ziegler lab (Benaroya Research Institute). Il1rl1–/–(ST2–/–) (PMID: 10727469) mice were provided by the Von Moltke lab (University of Washington). Mice in this study were bred and housed under specific-pathogen free conditions at the University of Washington.

Tamoxifen and in vivo injections

To induce Cre activity in Cre-ERT2 mice, 100 uL of Tamoxifen (Sigma) at 20 mg/mL dissolved in corn oil (Sigma) was injected every day for 5 consecutive days with mice analyzed one month later. For CD8 T cell depletion mice were injected on days -1, 2, 5, and 8 post-infection with 200 ug of αCD8 (Clone 2.43 BioXcell) or control IgG antibody in 200 uL PBS (PMID: 30143586). Depletion was confirmed by obtaining blood from the retro orbital sinus 6DPI. To induce Treg expansion (PMID: 30291203) the JES6-1 αIL-2 antibody was mixed at a 2:1 molar ratio with IL-2 for 30 minutes at 37°C in PBS. Mice were injected daily with a complex of 1 ug IL-2 (Peprotech) and 5 ug JES6-1 (BioXcell) intraperitoneally on days 2–4 post-infection in a total volume of 200 uL. Expansion was confirmed by obtaining blood from the retro orbital sinus at 9DPI.

Viruses

WNV-Tx was provided by Mike Gale of the University of Washington. WNV-E218A and ZIKV-Dakar strains utilized for intracranial infections were obtained from Robyn Klein at Washington University in St Louis. WNV-NS5-E218A contains a single point mutation in the gene encoding 2′-O-methyltransferase (PMID: 31611100). Mice were deeply anesthetized and intracranially administered 2e4 plaque-forming units (p.f.u.) of WNV-NS5-E218A or 1e6 PFU of ZIKV-Dakar as described previously (PMID: 31235930). Viruses were diluted in 20 μl of Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) and injected into the third ventricle of the brain with a guided 29-guage needle. Mock-infected mice were intracranially injected with 20 μl of HBSS. Footpad infections were performed by injection of 100 PFU WNV in 50 μL of HBSS into a rear footpad as previously described (PMID: 28366204). BHK21 cells were used for quantification of WNV Titers while Vero cells were used for titering ZIKV-Dakar as described (PMID: 24510289).

Infected mice were monitored daily for weight loss and presentation of clinical signs of disease, including hunched posture, ruffled fur, hindlimb weakness, and paresis. Severity of paresis was defined as follows: mild–partial loss of motor function in one hind limb; moderate–complete or nearly complete loss of motor function in one hind limb or partial loss of motor function in both hind limbs; severe–complete or nearly complete loss of motor function in both hind limbs and/or pronounced ataxia. Mice reaching a moribund state or losing more than 30% of initial body weight were euthanized as performed previously (PMID:28366204). All experiments were performed in both male and female 2-4-month-old mice, in accordance with protocols approved by the University of Washington Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Measurement of viral burden

WNV- or ZIKV-infected mice were sacrificed and tissues were collected, weighed, and homogenized with Precellys zirconia beads in a Precellys 24 homogenizer in 500 μl of PBS, and stored at –80°C until virus titration. Thawed samples were clarified by centrifugation (2,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min), and then diluted serially before infection of BHK21 cells for WNV or Vero cells for ZIKV titers. Plaque assays were overlaid with low-melting point agarose, fixed 4 days later with 4% formaldehyde, and stained with crystal violet. Viral burden was expressed on a log10 scale as p.f.u. per gram of tissue.

Tissue preparation and CNS leukocyte isolation

All tissues harvested from mice for subsequent immunohistochemical, MACs, qRT-PCR, protein, virologic, or flow cytometric analysis were extracted following extensive cardiac perfusion with 10 mL of sterile PBS after cutting the right atrium. For flow cytometry and MACs, leukocytes were isolated from whole brains after digestion in 0.05% collagenase A (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma- Aldrich), then purified via centrifugation in 37% isotonic Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich) as described (PMID: 22729249). For MACs cells were incubated with anti-F4/80 microbeads (Miltenyi) and separated with LS columns (Miltenyi) per manufacturer’s recommendations. FACs was performed on an LSRII (Becton Dickinson) with analysis completed on FlowJo (Becton Dickinson).

Immunofluorescence and FACs antibodies

Brain tissue was fixed for 48 h in 4% PFA, followed by cryoprotection in 30% sucrose for 48 h. Brains were then frozen in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek) on the freezing element of a Leica CM3050 S cryostat. 40-μm sections were sliced into 24-well plates containing PBS with 0.05% sodium azide as previously described (PMID: 29941548). Slices were permeabilized and blocked with 0.25% Triton X-100 and 5% Normal Donkey Serum (Sigma) for 1 hour followed by overnight incubation in 0.5% BSA with primary antibody at 4° C. The following antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining: rabbit anti-Iba1 (1:300; CP-290; Biocare Medical), Goat anti-Iba1(1:300; Abcam; ab5076), rat anti-CD68 (1:300; FA-11; Biolegend), Goat anti-IL-33 (AF3626; R&D), Rabbit anti-Olig2 (1:500; AB 9610; Millipore Sigma), Rat-anti GFAP (1:2000; 2.2B10; Thermo Fischer Scientific), Rabbit anti-Sox9 (1:500; AB5535; EMD Millipore), Rabbit anti-NeuN (1:2000; D3S3I; Cell Signaling), Chicken anti-NeuN (1:300; 266 006; Synaptic Systems), Rabbit anti-C1q (1:300; ab182451; Abcam), Rabbit anti-Cleaved caspase three (1:500; ab9661; Cell-Signaling), Rabbit anti-Phospho-c-Jun (1:1000; D47G9; Cell Signaling), and Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (1:2000; A21203; Life Technologies). Slices were washed three times for 5 min, incubated for 2 h at room temperature with the appropriate secondary antibodies (all Donkey-derived from Thermo Fisher or Jackson Immunology using Alexafluor 488, 594, and 647; Life Technologies; 1:1,000), washed in PBS with DAPI (1:20,000; 62248; Thermo Fischer Scientific) washed again three times for 5 min and mounted with Aquamount (14-390-5; Thermo Fischer Scientific). Blinded image analysis including cell counting and MFI calculations were all performed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health).

Antibody cocktails for FACs staining were used at 1:100 in 2 mM EDTA (15-575-020; Fischer Scientific) and 0.5% BSA (A7906-100G) or FOXP3/ Transcription Factor buffers (00-5523-00; eBioscience) when staining for FOXP3. Antibodies used included GLAST (130-123-555; Miltenyi), biotinylated ST2 (101001B; MD Bioscience), Streptavidin R-Phycoerythrin (S21338; Thermo Scientific) and PE-conjugated NS4b tetramers (Fred Hutch antibody core). Antibodies against CD3 (17A2; Fischer Scientific), CD4 (RM-4; Fischer Scientific), CD8 (53–6.7; Fischer Scientific), CD44 (IM7; Fischer Scientific), CD69 (H1.2F3; Fischer Scientific), FOXP3 (FJK-16s; Fischer Scientific), F4/80 (T45-2342; Fischer Scientific), NK1.1 (PK136; BioLegend), CD19 (1d3; Thermo Fisher), Ly6C (AL-21; Fischer Scientific), Ly6G (1A8; Fischer Scientific), GITR (DTA-1; Fischer Scientific), and CD25 (PC61; Fischer Scientific).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses comparing two groups at one time point were done using a student’s t-test in Prism software, v. 7.0a. One-way and two-way ANOVA were used appropriately and were indicated. The number of mice per group, test used, and p values are denoted in each Fig legend. Data was graphed using Prism software, v9 (GraphPad).

Macrophage preparation and RNA sequencing

After MACs isolation, brain macrophages were washed in PBS and cell pellets prepared using the RNAqueous Micro kit (Ambion) per manufacturer’s instruction. Total RNA was concentrated by evaporation using an Eppendorf Vacufuge system and was then added to lysis buffer from the SMART-Seq v4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit for Sequencing (Takara). Reverse transcription was performed followed by 20 cycles of PCR amplification to generate full length amplified cDNA. Sequencing libraries were constructed using the NexteraXT DNA sample preparation kit with unique dual indexes (Illumina) to generate Illumina-compatible barcoded libraries. Libraries were pooled and quantified using a Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies). Sequencing of pooled libraries was carried out on a NextSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina) with paired-end 59-base reads, using a NextSeq P3 sequencing kit (Illumina) with a target depth of 5 million reads per sample. Base calls were processed to FASTQs on BaseSpace (Illumina), and a base call quality-trimming step was applied to remove low-confidence base calls from the ends of reads. The FASTQs were aligned to the GRCm38 mouse reference genome, using the STAR aligner, and gene counts were generated using HTSeq-count. QC and metrics analysis were performed using the Picard family of tools (v1.134).

Following generation of the counts matrix analyses were performed using R (v4.2.2). The flow of analyses began with PCA analysis and visualization using the PCAtools package (v2.10). Normalization and differential gene expression testing analyses were performed using the DESeq2 package (v1.38.3) using the Wald statistical testing method applied two condition comparisons. The DESeq2 results were then used to generate ranks for gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using the fgsea package (v1.24.0) to test for enrichment of gene ontology terms using the mouse ontology gene sets (M5) collection downloaded from gsea-msigdb. The results from the GSEA and differential gene expression testing were visualized using a combination of the ggplot2 (v3.4.0), pheatmap (v1.0.12), and EnhancedVolcano (v1.16.0) packages. All code relevant to the data analyses in this study are available online at https://github.com/OberstLab. The software used for the R analyses are publicly available.

Figure preparation

Schematic representations in Figs 5, S2, S3 and S5 were created using Biorender.com and exported via a paid academic subscription by AO.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. (related to Fig 1). The IL-33 pathway improves disease outcomes across multiple models of flavivirus infection.

(A) Survival analysis of adult B6/J mice exposed to increasing doses of intracranial WNV-E218A and WNV-Tx. (B) Weight loss of Il33–/–, Il1rl1–/–, and B6/J mice following 2e4 PFU WNV-E218A intracranial infection. (C) Weight loss of Il33–/–, Il1rl1–/–, and B6/J mice following 1e6 PFU ZIKV-Dakar intracranial infection. (D) WNV Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 10 days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. (E) Survival analysis of Il1rl1–/–and B6/J mice following footpad infection with 100 PFU WNV-Tx. (F) Weight loss of Il1rl1–/–and B6/J mice following footpad infection with 100 PFU WNV-Tx. (G) WNV-Tx Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 7 days post-foot pad infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. Data are representative of 3 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (A, D) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test) (B, C, E) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. (related to Fig 2). Deletion of IL-33 in oligodendrocytes with tamoxifen treatment of Plp1ERT2Cre/+::Il33fl/fl mice.

(A) GFAP+ cell number by immunohistochemistry following intracranial infection with increasing doses of WNV-E218A. (B) Scheme for tamoxifen injections to induce IL-33 excision (created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO) and representative images of IL-33 loss in cortical oligodendrocytes following tamoxifen treatment (20x magnification, scale bars, 50 microns). Arrowheads Indicate Olig2+IL-33+ cells. (C) Quantification of total cortical oligodendrocyte number and IL-33+ oligodendrocytes following tamoxifen injection. Data are representative of 3 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). *** p < 0.001. (C) two-tailed student’s T test.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. (related to Fig 3). ST2 is highly expressed on adaptive immune subsets, but this expression is dispensable for host survival.

(A) Scheme for CD8 T cell depletion during intracranial WNV-E218A infection, created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO. (B) Peripheral blood counts 6 DPI with WNV-E218A to confirm CD8 depletion. (C) Survival analysis of mice with CD8 T cell depletion and WNV-E218A intracranial infection. (D) Weight change in mice with CD8 T cell depletion and control IgG injection following WNV-E218A intracranial infection. (E) Representative FACs plots and gating strategy for indicated cell types from brain homogenate 7 days post intracranial WNV-E218A infection. (F) Representative FACs plots of ST2 expression on indicated cell types from B6/J and Il1rl1–/–brain homogenate 7 days post intracranial WNV-E218A infection. (G) Quantification of ST2 excision on splenic and liver Tregs of indicated genotype one-month post tamoxifen treatment. (H) Weight change in mice with Treg ST2 deletion following intracranial infection with ZIKV-Dakar. (I) Scheme and cell number from peripheral blood of indicated immune cells following IL-2 complex treatment and WNV-E218A infection at 9 DPI. (J) gMFI of CD25 and GITR on peripheral blood Tregs at 9 DPI with WNV-E218A and IL-2 complex treatment. (K) Survival analysis of mice with control or IL-2 complex treatment following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (L) Weight change in mice with control or IL-2 complex treatment after intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. Data are representative of 2 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B, D, G, J, H, L) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons) (C, K) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test) (I) (Student’s two-tailed t Test).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. (related to Fig 4). Phenotypes of ST2 signaling on microglial activation during CNS Flavivirus infection.

(A) Representative immunofluorescent images of Iba1+ brain macrophages in B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post vehicle injection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (B) Quantification of Iba1+ cell number in vehicle injected mice of indicated brain regions. (C) Representative immunofluorescent images of C1q deposition in hippocampal CA3 of B6/J and Il33–/–mice 7 days post-infection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (D) Quantification of C1q gMFI by immunofluorescence in hippocampal CA3 of B6/J and Il33–/–mice 7 days post-infection. (E) Representative FACs plots of microglia from CX3CR1ERT2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl 30 days post tamoxifen treatment and following CD11b enrichment by MACs. (F) Quantification of MACs enrichment efficiency. (G) Quantification of Il1rl1 RNA by qRT-PCR of sorted microglia 30 days post tamoxifen treatment and following CD11b enrichment by MACs. (H) Weight change in CX3CR1ERT2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl mice following intracranial infection of WNV-E218A. (I) Survival analysis of mice with neuronal Il1rl1 deletion following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (J) Weight change of mice with neuronal Il1rl1 deletion following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. Data are representative of 2 (A-F) independent and 2 (G-N) pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B, F, H, L) (two-tailed T test) (D, I, J, N) (Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons) (M) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

(TIF)

S5 Fig. (related to Fig 5). Hallmark pathways enriched in Il33–/–hippocampal macrophages during WNV infection.

(A) Scheme of hippocampal macrophage isolation and RNAsequencing following intracranial WNV-E218A infection of B6/J and Il33–/–mice, created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO. (B) Representative FACS plots of MACs-sorted samples. (C) Quantification of sample purity by FACS post-MAC-sort. (D) Volcano plot showing enriched genes in Il33–/–hippocampal macrophages relative to B6/J with vehicle injection. (E) Top 20 significantly enriched Hallmark gene sets by GSEA of Il33–/–and B6/J hippocampal macrophages post-infection in vehicle-injected samples. (F) Heatmap of Inflammatory Response pathway genes in indicated samples. (G) Heatmap of Fatty Acid Metabolism pathway genes in indicated samples. (H) Heatmap of Oxidative Phosphorylation pathway genes in indicated samples. (I) Heatmap of Hypoxia pathway genes in indicated samples. (J) Heatmap of Apoptosis pathway genes in indicated samples. *** p < 0.001 Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. (related to Fig 6) IL-33 signaling prevents brain macrophage apoptosis following intracranial ZIKV-Dakar infection.

(A) %ZombieNIR+ dying cell populations of indicated type by FACs analysis of brain homogenates 14 days post-infection with WNV-E218A in B6/J and Il33–/–mice. (B) Cell number of indicated innate immune cell types per ½ brain by FACs 14 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (C) Representative images of CC3+ hippocampal CA1 brain macrophages in B6/J and Il33–/–mice 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (D) Quantification of CC3+ hippocampal CA1 brain macrophages in B6/J and Il33–/–mice. (E) Representative images of perivascular IgG staining in hippocampal CA3 in 7 days post-infection WNV-E218A and HBSS-injected brains from B6/J mice (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns).

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Pooja Jain and Valerie Sheehan for technical assistance. We thank the lab of Dr. Michael Gale, Jr., at the University of Washington for technical assistance and discussion. We thank the vivarium staff of the University of Washington Department of Comparative Medicine SLU 3.1 for their help and support. We thank all members of the Oberst Lab for their input and support. We thank the Von Moltke and Pepper labs of the University of Washington and the Ziegler lab of Benaroya Research Institute for mouse lines used in this study.

Data Availability

RNA sequencing data is available via the Gene Expression Omnibus, accession number GSE241804, or via this link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE241804.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by NIH/NIAID grants R01 AI132595 and R21 AI178512 to AO. AO and GN received salary support from NIH/NIAID. JMA was supported by the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation, and received salary support from this funder. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chakarov S, Ginhoux F, Ble C. Review Determinants of Resident Tissue Macrophage Identity and Function. 2020; 957–970. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wolf SA, Boddeke HWGM, Kettenmann H. Microglia in Physiology and Disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79: 619–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prinz M, Masuda T, Wheeler MA, Quintana FJ. Microglia and Central Nervous System-Associated Macrophages mdash from Origin to Disease Modulation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2021;39: 251–277. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-110159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klein RS, Garber C, Funk KE, Salimi H, Soung A, Kanmogne M, et al. Neuroinflammation During RNA Viral Infections. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37: 73–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lu Y, Basatemur G, Scott IC, Chiarugi D, Clement M, Harrison J, et al. Interleukin-33 Signaling Controls the Development of Iron-Recycling Macrophages. Immunity. 2020;52: 782–793.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vainchtein ID, Chin G, Cho FS, Kelley KW, Miller JG, Chien EC, et al. Astrocyte-derived interleukin-33 promotes microglial synapse engulfment and neural circuit development. Science. 2018: 1–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nguyen PT, Dorman LC, Pan S, Vainchtein ID, Han RT, Nakao-Inoue H, et al. Microglial Remodeling of the Extracellular Matrix Promotes Synapse Plasticity. Cell. 2020;182: 388–403.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gadani SP, Walsh JT, Smirnov I, Zheng J, Kipnis J. The Glia-Derived Alarmin IL-33 Orchestrates the Immune Response and Promotes Recovery following CNS Injury. Neuron. 2015;85: 703–709. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Palomo J, Reverchon F, Piotet J, Besnard AG, Couturier-Maillard A, Maillet I, et al. Critical role of IL-33 receptor ST2 in experimental cerebral malaria development. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45: 1354–1365. doi: 10.1002/eji.201445206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reverchon F, Mortaud S, Sivoyon M, Maillet I, Laugeray A, Palomo J, et al. IL-33 receptor ST2 regulates the cognitive impairments associated with experimental cerebral malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13: 1–25. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Franca RFO, Costa RS, Silva JR, Peres RS, Mendonça LR, Colón DF, et al. IL-33 signaling is essential to attenuate viral-induced encephalitis development by downregulating iNOS expression in the central nervous system. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13: 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0628-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Still KM, Batista SJ, O’Brien CA, Oyesola OO, Früh SP, Webb LM, et al. Astrocytes promote a protective immune response to brain Toxoplasma gondii infection via IL-33-ST2 signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16: 1–28. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marques RE, Besnard AG, Maillet I, Fagundes CT, Souza DG, Ryffel B, et al. Interleukin-33 contributes to disease severity in Dengue virus infection in mice. Immunology. 2018;155: 477–490. doi: 10.1111/imm.12988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Collins MH, Metz SW. Progress and Works in Progress: Update on Flavivirus Vaccine Development. Clin Ther. 2017;39: 1519–1536. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Petersen LR, Brault AC, Nasci RS. West Nile virus: Review of the literature. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310: 308–315. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gould E, Solomon T. Pathogenic flaviviruses. Lancet. 2008;371: 500–509. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60238-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vasek MJ, Garber C, Dorsey D, Durrant DM, Bollman B, Soung A, et al. A complement–microglial axis drives synapse loss during virus-induced memory impairment. Nature. 2016;534: 538–543. doi: 10.1038/nature18283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garber C, Vasek MJ, Vollmer LL, Sun T, Jiang X, Klein RS. Astrocytes decrease adult neurogenesis during virus-induced memory dysfunction via IL-1 article. Nat Immunol. 2018;19: 151–161. doi: 10.1038/s41590-017-0021-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garber C, Soung A, Vollmer LL, Kanmogne M, Last A, Brown J, et al. T cells promote microglia-mediated synaptic elimination and cognitive dysfunction during recovery from neuropathogenic flaviviruses. Nat Neurosci. 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0427-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Funk KE, Klein RS. CSF1R antagonism limits local restimulation of antiviral CD8 + T cells during viral encephalitis. 2019;4: 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Klein RS, Garber C, Howard N. Infectious immunity in the central nervous system and brain function. Nat Immunol. 2017;18: 132–141. doi: 10.1038/ni.3656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang Y, Szretter KJ, Vermi W, Gilfillan S, Rossini C, Cella M, et al. IL-34 is a tissue-restricted ligand of CSF1R required for the development of Langerhans cells and microglia. Nat Immunol. 2012;13: 753–760. doi: 10.1038/ni.2360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joshi A, Salib M, Viney TJ, Dupret D, Somogyi P. Behavior-Dependent Activity and Synaptic Organization of Septo-hippocampal GABAergic Neurons Selectively Targeting the Hippocampal CA3 Area. Neuron. 2017;96: 1342–1357.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borhegyi Z, Varga V, Szilágyi N, Fabo D, Freund TF. Phase segregation of medial septal GABAergic neurons during hippocampal theta activity. J Neurosci. 2004;24: 8470–8479. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1413-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jordan I, Briese T, Fischer N, Lau JY, Lipkin WI. Ribavirin Inhibits West Nile Virus Replication and Cytopathic Effect in Neural Cells. J Infect Dis. 2000;182: 1214–1217. doi: 10.1086/315847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schultz V, Cumberworth SL, Gu Q, Johnson N, Donald CL, McCanney GA, et al. Zika virus infection leads to demyelination and axonal injury in mature cns cultures. Viruses. 2021;13. doi: 10.3390/v13010091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schultz V, Barrie JA, Donald CL, Crawford CL, Mullin M, Anderson TJ, et al. Oligodendrocytes are susceptible to Zika virus infection in a mouse model of perinatal exposure: Implications for CNS complications. Glia. 2021;69: 2023–2036. doi: 10.1002/glia.24010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li X, Qi L, Yang D, Hao SJ, Zhang F, Zhu X, et al. Meningeal lymphatic vessels mediate neurotropic viral drainage from the central nervous system. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25: 577–587. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01063-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kovacs MA, Cowan MN, Babcock IW, Sibley LA, Still K, Batista SJ, et al. Meningeal lymphatic drainage promotes T cell responses against Toxoplasma gondii but is dispensable for parasite control in the brain. Elife. 2022;11: 1–28. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bonilla W V, Fröhlich A, Senn K, Kallert S, Fernandez M, Fallon PG, et al. The Alarmin Interleukin-33 Drives Protective Antiviral CD8+ TCell Responses. Science (80-). 2012. doi: 10.1126/science.1215418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baumann C, Bonilla W V., Fröhlich A, Helmstetter C, Peine M, Hegazy AN, et al. T-bet–and STAT4–dependent IL-33 receptor expression directly promotes antiviral Th1 cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112: 4056–4061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418549112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Popovic B, Golemac M, Podlech J, Zeleznjak J, Bilic-Zulle L, Lukic ML, et al. IL-33/ST2 pathway drives regulatory T cell dependent suppression of liver damage upon cytomegalovirus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13: 1–23. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Slon Campos JL, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton GR. The immune response against flaviviruses. Nat Immunol. 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0210-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lanteri MC, O’Brien KM, Purtha WE, Cameron MJ, Lund JM, Owen RE, et al. Tregs control the development of symptomatic West Nile virus infection in humans and mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119: 3266–3277. doi: 10.1172/JCI39387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shrestha B, Diamond M. Role of CD8+ T cells in control of West Nile virus infection. J Virol. 2004;78: 8312–8321. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.15.8312-8321.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gadani SP, Smirnov I, Smith AT, Overall CC, Kipnis J. Characterization of meningeal type 2 innate lymphocytes and their response to CNS injury. J Exp Med. 2016; 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Webster KE, Walters S, Kohler RE, Mrkvan T, Boyman O, Surh CD, et al. In vivo expansion of T reg cells with IL-2-mAb complexes: induction of resistance to EAE and long-term acceptance of islet allografts without immunosuppression. J Exp Med. 2009;206: 751–760. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.He D, Xu H, Zhang H, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A, Kuchroo VK. Disruption of the IL-33-ST2-AKT signaling axis impairs neurodevelopment by inhibiting microglial metabolic adaptation and phagocytic function. Immunity. 2022; 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bennett ML, Bennett FC, Liddelow SA, Ajami B, Zamanian JL, Fernhoff NB, et al. New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113: E1738–E1746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525528113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Köhler C. Allograft inflammatory factor-1/Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 is specifically expressed by most subpopulations of macrophages and spermatids in testis. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;330: 291–302. doi: 10.1007/s00441-007-0474-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Endo Y, Hirahara K, Iinuma T, Shinoda K, Tumes DJ, Asou HK, et al. The Interleukin-33-p38 kinase axis confers memory T helper 2 cell pathogenicity in the airway. Immunity. 2015;42: 294–308. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stephan AH, Barres B a., Stevens B. The Complement System: An Unexpected Role in Synaptic Pruning During Development and Disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35: 369–389. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goldmann T, Wieghofer P, Müller PF, Wolf Y, Varol D, Yona S, et al. A new type of microglia gene targeting shows TAK1 to be pivotal in CNS autoimmune inflammation. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16: 1618–26. doi: 10.1038/nn.3531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Norris GT, Smirnov I, Filiano AJ, Shadowen HM, Cody KR, Thompson JA, et al. Neuronal integrity and complement control synaptic material clearance by microglia after CNS injury. 2018;215. doi: 10.1084/jem.20172244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu B, Tai Y, Achanta S, Kaelberer MM, Caceres AI, Shao X, et al. IL-33/ST2 signaling excites sensory neurons and mediates itch response in a mouse model of poison ivy contact allergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113: E7572–E7579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606608113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Getts MT, Müller M, Rana S, Getts DR, Shrestha B, Terry RL, et al. Ly6c + “inflammatory monocytes” are microglial precursors recruited in a pathogenic manner in West Nile virus encephalitis. J Exp Med. 2008;205: 2319–2337. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Terry RL, Getts DR, Deffrasnes C, van Vreden C, Campbell IL, King NJC. Inflammatory monocytes and the pathogenesis of viral encephalitis. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9: 1–10. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Getts DR, Terry RL, Getts MT, Müller M, Rana S, Deffrasnes C, et al. Targeted blockade in lethal West Nile virus encephalitis indicates a crucial role for very late antigen (VLA)-4-dependent recruitment of nitric oxide-producing macrophages. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9: 2–9. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yarza R, Vela S, Solas M, Ramirez MJ. c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Front Pharmacol. 2016;6: 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Manning AM, Davis RJ. Targeting JNK for therapeutic benefit: From junk to gold? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2: 554–565. doi: 10.1038/nrd1132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan S a., Bennett ML, Scholze a. R, O’Keeffe S, et al. An RNA-Sequencing Transcriptome and Splicing Database of Glia, Neurons, and Vascular Cells of the Cerebral Cortex. J Neurosci. 2014;34: 11929–11947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ofengeim D, Ito Y, Najafov A, Zhang Y, Shan B, DeWitt JP, et al. Activation of necroptosis in multiple sclerosis. Cell Rep. 2015;10: 1836–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lüthi AU, Cullen SP, McNeela EA, Duriez PJ, Afonina IS, Sheridan C, et al. Suppression of Interleukin-33 Bioactivity through Proteolysis by Apoptotic Caspases. Immunity. 2009;31: 84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kearley J, Silver JS, Sanden C, Liu Z, Berlin AA, White N, et al. Cigarette smoke silences innate lymphoid cell function and facilitates an exacerbated type I interleukin-33-dependent response to infection. Immunity. 2015;42: 566–579. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bellver-Landete V, Bretheau F, Mailhot B, Vallières N, Lessard M, Janelle ME, et al. Microglia are an essential component of the neuroprotective scar that forms after spinal cord injury. Nat Commun. 2019;10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08446-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rasley A, Tranguch SL, Rati DM, Marriot I. Murine Glia Express the Immunosuppressive Cytokine, Interleukin-10, Following Exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi or Neisseria meningitidis. Glia. 2006;479: 132. doi: 10.1002/glia.20314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Trang T, Beggs S, Salter MW. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor from microglia: A molecular substrate for neuropathic pain. Neuron Glia Biol. 2012;7: 99–108. doi: 10.1017/S1740925X12000087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Medzhitov R, Schneider DS, Soares MP. Disease Tolerance as a Defense Strategy. Science (80-). 2012;335: 165–184. doi: 10.1126/science.1214935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ayres JS. The Biology of Physiological Health. Cell. 2020;181: 250–269. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alexander E Gorbalenya, Kellie A Jurado

26 May 2023

Dear Dr. Oberst,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 functions as a microglial survival factor during neuroinvasive flavivirus infection" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Kellie A. Jurado

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Alexander Gorbalenya

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

In addition to addressing the reviewers comments, in the updated version if you could please ensure inclusion of higher quality images within Figures so that data/conclusions can better be reviewed.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: Norris et al report on studies examining the role of IL-33 during intracranial infections with an attenuated strain of WNV and with ZIKV-Dakar. The attempt to identify cellular sources and targets of IL-33 within the flavivirus-infected CNS. They also utilized mice with global gene deletion of IL-33 and its receptor ST2 to evaluate overall survival, virologic control, and immune activation within various brain regions. They also used cell-specific deletion of ST2 to determine how IL-33 impacts the function and survival of myeloid and neural cells type. The authors conclude that IL-33 is expressed by oligodendrocytes and exerts prosurvival effects on microglia, limits monocyte entry and protects neurons from apoptosis in the context of WNV infection. The role of IL-33 and its receptor ST2 in the CNS during viral encephalitis has not been studied previously and the authors have excellent models to address these questions. While most of the experiments are performed to a high standard, in some (especially the critical experiments that led to the conclusions above) there are significant concerns regarding controls, statistical analyses and interpretation of data that need to be addressed. It is possible that some of the conclusions may change with more appropriate experimental design and statistical evaluation.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript from Norris, et al nicely demonstrates the importance of the IL-33 in models of neurotropic flavivirus infection. They find that IL-33 is necessary for survival and that oligodendrocytes are a key source of the alarmin. They observe fewer IL-33-expressing oligos during infection suggesting that IL-33 release from these cells types when they are lost during the disease process. The authors find that Iba-1 intensity is decreased in IL-33 knockout mice in comparison to controls. Mice lacking IL-33 signaling in microglia are more susceptible to infection than controls, suggesting that microglia sensing of IL-33 is critical for resistance to infection. The authors provide data that supports increased microglia death in the absence of IL-33 signaling. Overall, the data are compelling and the manuscript is well-written.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript presented by Norris et al. describes the role of IL-33 signaling in an in vivo neuronal viral infection. The manuscript is well-written, and the topic is relevant to the field. The experiments were conducted in a controlled manner. However, the major issue that I found is the lack of high-quality resolution figures. Since many of the results were based on immunofluorescence analysis, it is essential to include images that enable a better evaluation of the findings. Unfortunately, some of the figures have a resolution that is below the required standard to observe the results. Additionally, some figure legends are too small, making it challenging to comprehend the findings. Due to the inadequate images, I could not provide a better evaluation of this submission. Therefore, I suggest that the authors revise the manuscript and resubmit it with improved resolution figures. This revision will enable a better evaluation of the findings, making it easier to confirm the results as presented. I believe that this would greatly benefit the manuscript and contribute to its appreciation in the scientific community.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: Figure 1. There is a substantial difference in the survival curve of WT versus IL-33- or IL1rl1-deficient mice after infection with WNV-E218A. The KO mice appear to die earlier, suggesting a loss of virologic control by innate immune mechanisms, perhaps in the periphery. The authors should include cervical draining LNs in their virologic analyses to address this possibility, which is also highlighted by the ZIKV-Dak survival curves, in which none show this early effect. There is also a substantial difference in the survival curves observed comparing ZIKV-Dak infected IL-33- versus IL1rl1-deficient mice. Is this difference significant? These data suggest an alternative IL-33 receptor is involved in survival from ZIKV-Dak infection. Also, the trend towards decreased viral loads within the brainstem of IL1rl1-deficient mice infected with ZIKV-Dak should be further evaluated as this is consistent with the improved survival curve for this genotype compared with IL-33 KO mice. Importantly, a kinetic analysis of viral loads over time, in both rostral and caudal CNS, is required to conclude that loss of IL-33 or its receptors does not impact viral clearance. The difference in viral clearance within the CB by 10 dpi between WT and IL1rl1-deficient mice supports the need for this additional analysis.

Figure 2. It was very difficult to assess the data in this figure as no higher power images were provided and the differences in immunodetection of IL-33 is not that convincing – no conclusion can be drawn from 2 positive versus 0 positive cells. Also, Olig2 is expressed by oligodendrocyte precursor cells and by multipotential polydendrocytes, as is NG2, which could help identify these cells. In the HIP, about 76% of Olig2+ cells have NG2 co-expression, which is the highest among selected regions (doi.org/10.1186/s13041-021-00747-0). Plp immunostaining is a better marker of mature oligodendrocytes, which would also show their processes. The authors should perform double-label RNAscope studies using more appropriate cell markers to identify the cellular sources of IL-33 more convincingly. Please also denote the brain regions evaluated in each image. It is also confusing why the authors focus on areas of synapse elimination to evaluate myelinating cells, as synapses are not myelinated. Finally, the robust loss of survival phenotype observed in WNV-infected mice with IL-33 deletion in oligodendrocytes is striking. It is unclear why this result is not follow-up at all.

Figure 3. As mentioned by the author, clearance of i.c. infection with WNV-E218A relies on innate immune mechanisms, specifically the effects of interferon stimulated genes, such as IFIT1. Other papers cited show no role for T cells in viral clearance using this strain (Refs 19 and 15). Thus, this model is not appropriate to study the role of IL-33 in T cell-mediated virologic control. The authors should instead evaluate this in their ZIKV-Dak model, especially given the significant increase in T cell numbers and a trend of increased activation markers in CD8 T cells observed. It is unclear why the authors chose to pivot to T cells rather than following up on results examining glial cells.

Figure 4. At 7 dpi, monocytes heavily infiltrate the WNV-infected CNS and microglia become activated. As both express Iba1, this molecule cannot distinguish between these cells. Microglial specific markers should be used to distinguish effects on infiltrating versus resident myeloid cells. The authors cannot conclude effects specifically for microglia without these tools. Also, CX3CR1 is also expressed by T cells during viral infections

The correlations between IL-33 and Iba1 is poor. The data evaluating Iba1 at 10 dpi is interesting, but it is unclear whether there is loss of the macrophages or activated microglia. Microglial markers are needed to determine this. Similarly, the RNAseq experiment cannot distinguish between these two cell types. Finally, as CX3CR1 is expressed by memory T cells during viral clearance (10.1038/ncomms9306), the CreLox experiment does not specifically target microglia. The conclusion that ST2 expression on microglia is responsible for macrophage activation and host survival is not supported by the experimental approaches used.

Figure 5. In this figure the authors isolated myeloid cells for RNAseq. However, it is unclear whether the alterations in gene expression are due to effects on macrophages or microglia, or even on differential recruitment of myeloid cells. The authors need to address this issue throughout the manuscript.

Figure 6. The data evaluating myeloid cell survival are not very convincing as the flow cytometric analysis does not show a large effect and there are limited numbers of cells detected via immunostaining, which are unlikely to impact survival of the mice. Again, the lack of microglial markers does not allow the authors to conclude that activation and apoptosis are limited to microglia. Indeed, increased monocyte entry would mean more myeloid cell death as this commonly occurs in the setting of viral encephalitis. The IgG detection is not consistent with BBB disruption - the IgG would be localized strongly to vessels and fan out from them into the parenchyma. The increase in GFAP is consistent with immune activation of astrocytes, however, why was this not observed in FigS2?

Reviewer #2: Importantly, the authors conclude that microglia activation (Iba-1 MFI) and microglia apoptosis are influence by IL-33/ST2. In figure 6A, the number of dead microglia in the tissue prep are increased, but it is not clear (unless I missed it) whether live microglia number decreases in ST2 or IL-33 knockout mice. To this end, Iba-1 MFI is clearly decreased in knockout mice, but is this due to the absence of the cells or the lack of “activation.” The title of Figure 4 conveys the conclusion that microglia activation is reduced in the absence of IL-33 based primarily on Iba-1 intensity. Because this marker is also used to show the presence of cell (including some monocyte-derived cells which appear to increase in ko mice), it is difficult to support a conclusion for “activation” based on Iba-1 alone. Perhaps some “activation” genes from the RNAseq dataset could be helpful for further demonstrating this point. For example, reduced expression of MHC molecules, ccl2, or itgax and higher expression of p2ry12, sall1/3, or fcrls in microglia from knockout mice would greatly support this conclusion.

Reviewer #3: The resolution of Figures 2 to 6 is poor. As a result, I could not provide a detailed comment about the results presented in these figures. The quality of the images is not sufficient to observe positive staining as the authors claim. The same issue applies to figures without immunofluorescence (IF) images, as the legends are too small to read. Due to the

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: 1) The authors nicely show a decrease in oligodendrocytes expressing IL-33, but there is also a decrease in IL-33+ astroyctes following infection (Figure 2C). This result should be mentioned in the results and discussion that astrocytes may also be a relevant source of IL-33.

2) ST2 is notoriously difficult to stain for using flow cytometry. The authors do not detect ST2 expression by flow in several cell types (Figures 3C and 3D), but nicely show Il1rl1 expression by real-time PCR. For example, Figure S4I nicely shows expression in microglia. Thus, examination of potential ST2-expressing population could be demonstrated by PCR, RNAscope, or other methods. Alternatively, the conclusions made from the flow cytometry staining could be discussed with the caveat that ST2 flow cytometry staining has rarely implicated cell types in the CNS that are important for responses to IL-33.

3) The authors include a description of similar studies performed with Toxo infection (line 84-86). The authors should correct the statement to reflect that astrocytes were the key responders to IL-33 in this study.

Reviewer #3: Lines 87 to 88 "​​whether IL-33 contributes to beneficial or pathogenic responses to neurotropic viral infection remains unexplored"

The authors must consider some literature reports such as DOI 10.1111/imm.12988 and especially DOI 10.1186/s12974-016-0628-1 in the context of neuroinflammation and IL-33 signaling.

Lines 95 to 98 "Specifically, during acute infection, microglia were shown to phagocytose neuronal processes the murine hippocampus, a phenomenon that limits viral dissemination while causing disease sequelae specific to episodic spatial memory"

This sentence seems odd, please review it carefully

Lines 103 to 106 "We found that following CNS infection oligodendrocyte numbers acutely decrease, with IL-33 expression by oligodendrocytes necessary for host survival, implicating release of IL-33 from dying oligodendrocytes."

Please review, I believe it refers to reduced IL-33 expression as a consequence of diminished numbers of oligodendrocyte cells

Lines 134 to 136 - Please explain the rationale for using IL-1 and IL-33 knockout mice to study type I IFN genes. ZIKV is also sensitive to type I IFN and I don't see the correlation here

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Rafael Freitas Oliveira Franca

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Alexander E Gorbalenya, Kellie A Jurado

5 Nov 2023

Dear Dr. Oberst,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 functions as a microglial survival factor during neuroinvasive flavivirus infection' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kellie A. Jurado

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Alexander Gorbalenya

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed all the critiques from the prior review.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed all the critiques from the prior review.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed all the critiques from the prior review.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Alexander E Gorbalenya, Kellie A Jurado

15 Nov 2023

Dear Dr. Oberst,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Oligodendrocyte-derived IL-33 functions as a microglial survival factor during neuroinvasive flavivirus infection," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. (related to Fig 1). The IL-33 pathway improves disease outcomes across multiple models of flavivirus infection.

    (A) Survival analysis of adult B6/J mice exposed to increasing doses of intracranial WNV-E218A and WNV-Tx. (B) Weight loss of Il33–/–, Il1rl1–/–, and B6/J mice following 2e4 PFU WNV-E218A intracranial infection. (C) Weight loss of Il33–/–, Il1rl1–/–, and B6/J mice following 1e6 PFU ZIKV-Dakar intracranial infection. (D) WNV Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 10 days post-infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. (E) Survival analysis of Il1rl1–/–and B6/J mice following footpad infection with 100 PFU WNV-Tx. (F) Weight loss of Il1rl1–/–and B6/J mice following footpad infection with 100 PFU WNV-Tx. (G) WNV-Tx Viral titers from indicated CNS components and tissues of mice 7 days post-foot pad infection via plaque assay on BHK cells. Data are representative of 3 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (A, D) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test) (B, C, E) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. (related to Fig 2). Deletion of IL-33 in oligodendrocytes with tamoxifen treatment of Plp1ERT2Cre/+::Il33fl/fl mice.

    (A) GFAP+ cell number by immunohistochemistry following intracranial infection with increasing doses of WNV-E218A. (B) Scheme for tamoxifen injections to induce IL-33 excision (created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO) and representative images of IL-33 loss in cortical oligodendrocytes following tamoxifen treatment (20x magnification, scale bars, 50 microns). Arrowheads Indicate Olig2+IL-33+ cells. (C) Quantification of total cortical oligodendrocyte number and IL-33+ oligodendrocytes following tamoxifen injection. Data are representative of 3 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). *** p < 0.001. (C) two-tailed student’s T test.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. (related to Fig 3). ST2 is highly expressed on adaptive immune subsets, but this expression is dispensable for host survival.

    (A) Scheme for CD8 T cell depletion during intracranial WNV-E218A infection, created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO. (B) Peripheral blood counts 6 DPI with WNV-E218A to confirm CD8 depletion. (C) Survival analysis of mice with CD8 T cell depletion and WNV-E218A intracranial infection. (D) Weight change in mice with CD8 T cell depletion and control IgG injection following WNV-E218A intracranial infection. (E) Representative FACs plots and gating strategy for indicated cell types from brain homogenate 7 days post intracranial WNV-E218A infection. (F) Representative FACs plots of ST2 expression on indicated cell types from B6/J and Il1rl1–/–brain homogenate 7 days post intracranial WNV-E218A infection. (G) Quantification of ST2 excision on splenic and liver Tregs of indicated genotype one-month post tamoxifen treatment. (H) Weight change in mice with Treg ST2 deletion following intracranial infection with ZIKV-Dakar. (I) Scheme and cell number from peripheral blood of indicated immune cells following IL-2 complex treatment and WNV-E218A infection at 9 DPI. (J) gMFI of CD25 and GITR on peripheral blood Tregs at 9 DPI with WNV-E218A and IL-2 complex treatment. (K) Survival analysis of mice with control or IL-2 complex treatment following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (L) Weight change in mice with control or IL-2 complex treatment after intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. Data are representative of 2 pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B, D, G, J, H, L) (2-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak Multiple comparisons) (C, K) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test) (I) (Student’s two-tailed t Test).

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. (related to Fig 4). Phenotypes of ST2 signaling on microglial activation during CNS Flavivirus infection.

    (A) Representative immunofluorescent images of Iba1+ brain macrophages in B6/J and Il1rl1–/–mice 7 days post vehicle injection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (B) Quantification of Iba1+ cell number in vehicle injected mice of indicated brain regions. (C) Representative immunofluorescent images of C1q deposition in hippocampal CA3 of B6/J and Il33–/–mice 7 days post-infection (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (D) Quantification of C1q gMFI by immunofluorescence in hippocampal CA3 of B6/J and Il33–/–mice 7 days post-infection. (E) Representative FACs plots of microglia from CX3CR1ERT2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl 30 days post tamoxifen treatment and following CD11b enrichment by MACs. (F) Quantification of MACs enrichment efficiency. (G) Quantification of Il1rl1 RNA by qRT-PCR of sorted microglia 30 days post tamoxifen treatment and following CD11b enrichment by MACs. (H) Weight change in CX3CR1ERT2Cre/+:: Il1rl1fl/fl mice following intracranial infection of WNV-E218A. (I) Survival analysis of mice with neuronal Il1rl1 deletion following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (J) Weight change of mice with neuronal Il1rl1 deletion following intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. Data are representative of 2 (A-F) independent and 2 (G-N) pooled independent experiments (error bars, SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B, F, H, L) (two-tailed T test) (D, I, J, N) (Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons) (M) (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test).

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. (related to Fig 5). Hallmark pathways enriched in Il33–/–hippocampal macrophages during WNV infection.

    (A) Scheme of hippocampal macrophage isolation and RNAsequencing following intracranial WNV-E218A infection of B6/J and Il33–/–mice, created using Biorender.com and exported via an academic subscription belonging to AO. (B) Representative FACS plots of MACs-sorted samples. (C) Quantification of sample purity by FACS post-MAC-sort. (D) Volcano plot showing enriched genes in Il33–/–hippocampal macrophages relative to B6/J with vehicle injection. (E) Top 20 significantly enriched Hallmark gene sets by GSEA of Il33–/–and B6/J hippocampal macrophages post-infection in vehicle-injected samples. (F) Heatmap of Inflammatory Response pathway genes in indicated samples. (G) Heatmap of Fatty Acid Metabolism pathway genes in indicated samples. (H) Heatmap of Oxidative Phosphorylation pathway genes in indicated samples. (I) Heatmap of Hypoxia pathway genes in indicated samples. (J) Heatmap of Apoptosis pathway genes in indicated samples. *** p < 0.001 Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. (related to Fig 6) IL-33 signaling prevents brain macrophage apoptosis following intracranial ZIKV-Dakar infection.

    (A) %ZombieNIR+ dying cell populations of indicated type by FACs analysis of brain homogenates 14 days post-infection with WNV-E218A in B6/J and Il33–/–mice. (B) Cell number of indicated innate immune cell types per ½ brain by FACs 14 days post intracranial infection with WNV-E218A. (C) Representative images of CC3+ hippocampal CA1 brain macrophages in B6/J and Il33–/–mice 7 days post-infection with WNV-E218A (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns). (D) Quantification of CC3+ hippocampal CA1 brain macrophages in B6/J and Il33–/–mice. (E) Representative images of perivascular IgG staining in hippocampal CA3 in 7 days post-infection WNV-E218A and HBSS-injected brains from B6/J mice (20x magnification, scale bars, 100 microns).

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    RNA sequencing data is available via the Gene Expression Omnibus, accession number GSE241804, or via this link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE241804.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES