Skip to main content
Clinical Kidney Journal logoLink to Clinical Kidney Journal
. 2023 Dec 4;16(Suppl 2):ii1–ii8. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad199

Ethnicity and IgA nephropathy: worldwide differences in epidemiology, timing of diagnosis, clinical manifestations, management and prognosis

Mingfeng Lee 1, Hitoshi Suzuki 2,3,, Yoshihito Nihei 4, Keiichi Matsuzaki 5, Yusuke Suzuki 6,
PMCID: PMC10695519  PMID: 38053973

ABSTRACT

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the most common primary glomerulonephritis, is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease. Significant variances in epidemiology, clinical manifestation, timing of diagnosis, management and renal prognosis of IgAN have been reported worldwide. The incidence of IgAN is the most frequent in Asia, followed by Europe, and lower in Africa. Moreover, Asian patients show more frequent acute lesions in renal histology and present poorer renal outcomes compared with Caucasians. The comorbidities also show the difference between Asians and Caucasians. Although the frequency of gross hematuria with upper respiratory tract infection is not different, comorbidities with gastrointestinal diseases are reported to be higher in Europe. Recently, genetic studies for variant ethnic patients revealed widely ranging genetic risks in each ethnicity. A genetic risk score is most elevated in Asians, intermediate in Europeans and lowest in Africans, consistent with the disease prevalence of IgAN globally. Ethnic variance might be highly affected by the difference in genetic background. However, it is also essential to mention that the different timing of diagnosis due to variant urinary screening systems and the indication for renal biopsy in different countries may also contribute to these variances. The management of IgAN also varies internationally. Currently, several novel therapies based on the pathogenesis of IgAN are being assessed and are expected to become available soon. Further understanding the ethnic variance of IgAN might help establish individualized care for this disease. Here, we review the issues of ethnic heterogeneities of IgAN.

Keywords: corticosteroid, ethnicity, genetics, IgA nephropathy, tonsillectomy

INTRODUCTION

Immunoglobulin nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, characterized by the deposition of IgA in the glomerular mesangial region. Pathological diagnosis using renal biopsy is essential to make a definitive diagnosis. Around 40% of patients progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over 20 years [1]. Most cases are asymptomatic, but some cases present gross hematuria, often concurrent with upper respiratory tract or gastrointestinal infections. Therefore, abnormal mucosal immune responses to exogenous antigens are considered to be involved in its pathogenesis.

Galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), which lacks galactose in O-linked glycans of the hinge region of IgA1, is a key effector molecule in the pathogenesis of IgAN [2]. Autoantibodies against Gd-IgA1 form immune complexes with Gd-IgA1, which deposit in the mesangial regions and induce glomerular inflammation. These serial processes are advocated as Gd-IgA1 multi-hit pathogenesis of IgAN [3].

Regarding the prevalence of IgAN, there are regional and racial differences. Familial IgAN is also observed, especially in Western countries [4, 5]. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified some genetic loci associated with the risk of developing and progression of IgAN. Moreover, genetic risk alleles for IgAN were found to be more frequent in Chinese than in Europeans, which correlates with the epidemiological patterns [6]. These facts tell us there is some genetic background in this disease. Furthermore, the screening systems and management strategies are also different in each region. Here, we reviewed the issues of ethnic or regional heterogeneities of IgAN.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

The incidence of adult IgAN is estimated at least 25 cases per million population yearly (pmp/year) worldwide, the highest among other glomerular diseases including membranous nephropathy (12 pmp/year), minimal change disease (8 pmp/year), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (6 pmp/year) and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (2 pmp/year) [7]. The prevalence of IgAN varies largely depending on the geographic distribution. IgAN is most frequent in Asia, followed by Europe, and least in Africa [8], for example, 39–45 cases pmp/year in Japan [9], 25–31 cases pmp/year in France [10] and 9.9 cases pmp/year in the UK [11]. The frequency of IgAN in primary glomerular disease also varies worldwide [8, 12]. IgAN accounts for more than 40% in some countries, such as Japan [13], China [14], France [10] and Germany [15]. On the other hand, it accounts for less than 10% of Bangladesh [16], India [17], Latin America [12] and African countries [18]. These differences may be partly due to the various indications for renal biopsy in each country, but diversity in the genetic background also plays a significant role.

The abovementioned data could be underestimated since most IgAN is asymptomatic and renal biopsy is essential for a definitive diagnosis. Furthermore, the degree of underestimation is likely to vary from country to country, as urinary screening systems and indications for renal biopsy differ internationally. While systematic mass screening of urine in populations is widespread in some Asian countries such as Japan [19], Korea [20], Taiwan [21] and Singapore [22], it is not common in Western countries [23].

The male-to-female ratio of IgAN also shows regional differences. A Japanese cohort enrolling 871 patients and a Chinese cohort enrolling 988 patients showed that the ratio of males to females was 1:1.4 [24, 25]. On the other hand, the cohort data from Europe or the USA showed that the ratio of males to females was around 2:1 [26, 27]. While the regional differences in IgAN might be partly due to environmental factors, differences in disease-susceptibility genes among races are also identified, explaining racial diversity in this disease. In fact, geographic variation in the genetic risk for IgAN worldwide was indicated to be the highest for East Asians and Native Americans, intermediate for Middle Easterners and Europeans, and the lowest median scores for Africans [28].

PATHOGENESIS

Gross hematuria induced by respiratory tract infections in patients with IgAN and the association of IgAN with bowel diseases has been considered evidence of a mucosa–kidney axis in IgAN [29]. Although the exact mechanism of synthesizing Gd-IgA1 is not clear enough, several researchers suggest that mucosal immune dysregulation might be involved in producing Gd-IgA1 [30, 31]. The disease-susceptibility genes of IgAN, which GWAS identified, are associated with mucosal barrier and response to mucosal pathogens [32]. Nephritogenic IgA production due to abnormal mucosal immune response might be involved in the mucosa–kidney axis in IgAN.

Whether nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoid tissues (NALT) or gastrointestinal tract-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT) is the main responsible site of abnormal immune response in IgAN has been discussed [33]. To date, several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of tonsillectomy in treating IgAN, especially in Asian countries [34–39]. The favorable effect of tonsillectomy in lowering the risk of renal outcomes supports the involvement of NALT in the pathogenesis of IgAN, at least in Asian patients. In Europe, many reports of IgAN combined with gastrointestinal complications such as celiac disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and irritable bowel syndrome have been reported [40–42]. Based on a clinical survey on the clinical presentation of patients with IgAN in Europe and Japan, the number of IgAN with gastrointestinal complications is reported to be 17% in Europe, while it is 1% in Japan [42]. Previously, the gut–kidney crosstalk in IgAN has been much discussed in Europe [30, 43]. Recently therapeutic strategies targeting GALT, such as targeted-release formulation of budesonide (TRF-budesonide), have been developed [44, 45].

However, according to a clinical survey, the incidence of gross hematuria coincident with upper respiratory tract infection is not significantly different between Japan (29.8%) and Europe (22.7%) [42]. These facts indicate that abnormal immune responses of NALT might be involved in both Asian and European patients. Indeed, a retrospective cohort study including 264 Caucasian patients also indicated the efficacy of tonsillectomy in delaying the progression of IgAN, mainly in patients with gross hematuria [46]. Further prospective investigations of the effectiveness of tonsillectomy in Caucasian patients are required. The degree of responsibility of each mucosal immune tissue may differ in each ethnicity and affect the clinical symptoms and even treatment response.

GENETIC CHARACTERISTICS

Genetic factors affect the pathogenesis of IgAN. Several GWAS performed in different ethnicities have identified the risk genetic loci associated with the development of IgAN. Some of the identified genes are associated with mucosal immunity (ITGAM, ITGAX, DEFA, LIF, OSM, HORMAD2, MTMR3 and TNFSF13), both innate and adaptive immunity (CARD9, VAV3, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 and HLA-DRB1), and complement activation (CFH, CFHR1 and CFHR3) [32, 47].

A genetic risk score based on the GWAS-identified loci is highest in Asians, intermediate in Europeans and lowest in Africans, consistent with the variation in disease prevalence among Asian, European and African populations [28, 48]. The study comparing the genetic risk score of diverse ethnicities in the USA still showed a similar tendency: US Asian-Americans showed the highest genetic risk, US white Americans intermediate and US African-Americans the lowest [49]. Racial differences in disease-susceptibility genes were also examined using Chinese and European cohorts. In this study, Li et al. showed that mucosal immunity- and complement-related genes were more strongly associated with Chinese than with Europeans [50]. These findings suggest that genetic factors are involved in racial and regional differences in the development of IgAN.

GWAS for serum Gd-IgA1 levels, using Asian and European populations, discovered two genome-wide significant loci, in C1GALT1 and C1GALT1C1 [51]. These genes encode enzymes essential for the O-glycosylation of IgA1. Notably, the frequency of these risk alleles is also reported to be different between Asians and Europeans, which also indicates the racial variety of IgAN.

TIMING OF DIAGNOSIS

IgAN is usually asymptomatic; its initial manifestation is often hematuria, which generally appears earlier than proteinuria. Therefore, urine screening is an effective way to detect the early stage of IgAN. In Japan, annual urinalysis targeting children began in 1974 as a national system for early detection of kidney disease [19]. Due to the widespread screening system, most cases of IgAN in Japan are detected by abnormal urinary findings such as microscopic hematuria and proteinuria. A study investigating the prevalence of urine abnormalities in annual urinary screening at school reported the prevalence of urinary abnormalities was 0.52% among elementary school children and 0.75% among junior high school children in Japan [52]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the proportion of ESRD due to glomerulonephritis has significantly decreased in the generation after the initiation of urinary screening compared with that before the initiation of screening [53]. Early detection and referral to nephrologists due to the urinalysis screening program may help reduce the number of ESRD due to glomerulonephritis.

Based on the above successful experience, dipstick urine tests have been included in the Japanese nationwide mass screening program, Specific Health Checkup, which started in 2008 and targets all adults between 40 and 74 years of age [54]. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of mass screening for dipstick urine tests has been analyzed and the results suggested that it could be justifiable as an efficient use of finite healthcare resources [55, 56]. A retrospective cohort study for a large-scale Japanese health checkup including 2104 persons showed that 3-year repetitive isolated hematuria is associated with glomerulonephritis [57]. In addition, a longitudinal analysis of annual health check-up at university health service, including 13 640 young participants, suggested the effectiveness of multi-year annual urinalysis in identifying the high-risk group for glomerulonephritis [58]. These results indicate the usefulness of applying mass urinary screening programs worldwide. Indeed, nationwide mass urinary screening for school children has been conducted in Taiwan since 1990 [59] and Korea since 1998 [20]. A study of 630 students aged 6–15 years with positive urinary screening in Taiwan reported that glomerular nephritis is the major cause of urinary abnormalities [60]. A study surveying Korean school urinalysis screening from 1998 to 2004 showed isolated proteinuria was about 0.2%, and occult blood was about 0.8%. Furthermore, IgAN was noted in 43.8% of renal biopsy cases due to urinary abnormalities [20]. However, nationwide systematic mass urinary screening is currently limited in several Asian countries and is not common in Western countries. The difference in the screening system may affect the clinical stage of IgAN at the time of renal biopsy in each country.

Renal biopsy is essential for the diagnosis of IgAN. Histopathological findings are important for prognostic prediction and determining therapeutic strategies in IgAN. However, there is no consensus on the indication for renal biopsy, especially in patients who present microscopic hematuria with subtle proteinuria (<0.5 g/day). This situation can arise in the early phase of IgAN. Such cases might be detected by systematic mass screening of urine in populations conducted in some Asian countries. Therefore, IgAN might be diagnosed in an earlier phase in these Asian countries than in European countries. Indeed, a clinical survey comparing the Japanese and European cohorts reported that the frequency of preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (>60 mL/min/1.73 m2) at the time of renal biopsy was low in Europe (55%) compared with Japan (71%) [42]. These data also support that IgAN was possibly diagnosed in an earlier phase in Asian countries with the systematic mass screening of urine in populations.

Recently, novel biomarkers, including serum Gd-IgA1, serum glycan-specific antibodies and urinary Gd-IgA1, have been reported as potentially helpful in diagnosing IgAN [61–63]. Moreover, our research group recently reported anti–βII-spectrin IgA might also be involved in the pathogenesis of IgAN and could be the candidate for its disease-specific biomarker [64]. The screening system using novel biomarkers in addition to conventional screening can potentially reduce medical expenses [65]. Establishing an effective screening system may help to improve the renal prognosis of patients with IgAN and is further useful in reducing overall medical costs.

RENAL HISTOLOGY

The Oxford classification of IgAN is widely used to evaluate histological severity associated with renal prognosis, independent of clinical parameters [66]. Validation studies have been conducted worldwide and found that histopathological findings also showed regional differences. Active lesions such as endocapillary hypercellularity (E lesion) and crescent formation (C lesion) are more frequently observed in Asian cohorts than in Europe. E lesion was present in 42% of cases in the Japanese cohort, compared with 10%–14% in the European cohort, and C lesion was present in 48% of cases in Chinese and 63% in the Japanese cohort, compared with only 17% in the European cohort [67–70]. No differences in glomerulosclerosis or tubulointerstitial lesions were observed among the above cohorts. The variations in the characteristics of renal histopathology among the ethnicities indicate that the disease severities at the time of biopsy differ between races.

MANAGEMENT

Currently, there is no established disease-specific treatment for IgAN. Furthermore, the management strategies for IgAN vary internationally. In the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline, renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, blood pressure control, cardiovascular risk management and lifestyle modification are listed as highly recommended management of IgAN [71]. Other treatment options, such as corticosteroids, nonsteroidal immunosuppressive agents and tonsillectomy (combined with steroid pulse therapy), remain controversial and are listed as second-line treatments only for selected cases in the KDIGO guideline. The evidence supporting the value of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive agents and tonsillectomy is inconsistent, especially when considered by ethnicity.

RAS inhibitors are widely used in both Japan and Europe, but corticosteroids are more frequent in Japan than in Europe [42, 72, 73]. Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the efficacy of corticosteroids in treating IgAN but suggested increased risks of adverse events with corticosteroids [74, 75]. The Supportive versus immunosuppressive Therapy for the treatment of Progressive IgA Nephropathy (STOP-IgAN) trial included 337 patients from Germany, and methylprednisolone was administered intravenously at a dose of 1 g/day for 3 days at the start of Months 1, 3 and 5, and oral prednisolone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg per 48 h on the other days [74]. The Therapeutic Evaluation of Steroids in IgA Nephropathy Global (TESTING) trial involved 503 participants from Australia, Canada, China, India and Malaysia. In this trial, oral methylprednisolone was administered at 0.6–0.8 mg/kg/day and weaned off over 6–8 months [75]. However, the corticosteroid doses used in the above trials seem higher than in Japan [76, 77]. Furthermore, the two RCTs mentioned above have an important bias: the patients enrolled in these trials received treatment after a different time interval from the kidney biopsy. In the TESTING trial, due to an excess report of severe infection, the protocol was modified in 2016. The methylprednisolone dose was reduced to 0.4 mg/kg/day for 2 months, followed by weaning by 4 mg/day/month over 6–9 months. Furthermore, prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia was given during the first 12 weeks of treatment [78]. With the low-dose corticosteroid, the steroid-treated group showed significantly reduced risks of kidney function decline, kidney failure or death due to kidney disease [79]. Thus, administering appropriate doses of steroids in selected patients and managing adverse effects might be recommended in IgAN patients.

One of the recent issues was the approval for clinical use of the TRF-budesonide (NEFECON®) as the first disease-specific treatment of IgAN by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2021. TRF-budesonide is a corticosteroid designed to be released at the terminal ileum, with the highest concentration in mucosal Peyer's patches. It undergoes rapid metabolization in the liver, and less than 10% of the drug enters systemic circulation [80]. In the Targeted-release Budesonide Versus Placebo in Patients with IgA Nephropathy (NEFIGAN) trial conducted in European countries, TRF-budesonide added to optimized RAS inhibitors significantly reduced proteinuria in patients with IgAN [44]. Moreover, the incidence of adverse events was similar between the TRF-budesonide group and the controls. Currently, the NefIgArd phase III trial evaluating TRF-budesonide is conducted across Europe, North America, South America and Asia Pacific. The interim analysis showed the patients with TRF-budesonide presented proteinuria reduction and eGFR preservation compared with the placebo [45]. Patients remain in follow-up in this trial, and confirmatory data are awaited to assess whether TRF-budesonide is effective in different ethnicities.

Regarding nonsteroidal immunosuppressive agents, the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been reported in China. An RCT demonstrated the potential of MMF as a corticosteroid-sparing agent among patients from China [81]. On the other hand, a RCT including patients from the USA and Canada showed no benefit of MMF in reducing proteinuria in IgAN [82]. According to these results, the KIDGO guidelines suggest MMF should only be considered in Chinese patients [71]. A phase II clinical trial for HCQ in Chinese patients showed the effectiveness of HCQ in addition to optimized RAS inhibitors for reducing proteinuria in patients with IgAN over 6 months without evidence of adverse events [83]. Currently, the evidence for MMF and HCQ is limited to Chinese patients. Regarding other ethnicities, further investigation might be required.

Tonsillectomy combined with steroid pulse therapy (TSP) has become increasingly common in some Asian countries, especially Japan. TSP was first reported by Hotta et al. in 2001 [77]. The effectiveness of tonsillectomy in improving renal outcomes in IgAN patients has been confirmed in a recent meta-analysis and a large cohort study [38, 39]. According to these reports, the KDIGO guideline mentioned that tonsillectomy could be considered in Japanese patients [71]. Indeed, the proportion of chronic glomerulonephritis cases accounted for more than 40% of the diseases causing ESRD before the 1990s in Japan; however, in recent years, it has decreased to 20%–30% [84]. The widespread mass urine screening systems contribute to the early diagnosis, and developing TSP is considered to improve renal prognosis in patients with IgAN. On the other hand, a European cohort (European Validation Study of The Oxford Classification of IgA Nephropathy: VALIGA), pairing 41 patients with tonsillectomy and 41 without tonsillectomy with similar risk of progression, showed no significant difference in the renal outcome [85]. However, as mentioned above, the timing of diagnosis might be different in Asian and European countries. Thus, the timing of intervention with tonsillectomy may also be different in the Asian cohort and European cohort, explaining the reason why the Asian and European cohorts showed different results regarding the efficacy of tonsillectomy, even though there is no difference in the incidence of gross hematuria with upper respiratory tract infection. An RCT with long-term follow-up might be required to verify the efficacy of tonsillectomy in European patients.

RENAL PROGNOSIS

In general, the disease progression of IgAN is relatively slow, but the clinical course of IgAN varies widely. Some patients have only asymptomatic microscopic hematuria or mild proteinuria, while some cases present rapid deterioration of renal function. Past studies indicated that Asian patients have a poorer prognosis than Caucasian patients [86]. In a follow-up study of 141 Caucasian patients with IgAN with asymptomatic hematuria and mild proteinuria (urinary protein <0.5 g/day), no patients developed ESRD, and 96.7% of patients maintained their serum creatinine levels at less than 50% increase at 10 years and 91.9% at 20 years [87]. Meanwhile, in a Japanese retrospective cohort with 871 patients, the renal survival rate was 87.5% at 10 years and 72.6% at 20 years, even with an average urinary protein level of 0.68 g/day and normal renal function at diagnosis [25]. These data suggest that IgAN in Asians may have a worse prognosis than Caucasians, even if the proteinuria at diagnosis showed the same degree [86]. However, other factors, such as the timing of intervention, treatment strategies and comorbidities, should be considered when interpreting prognostic factors.

Recently, Barbour et al. established a clinical prediction model based on a large multi-ethnic cohort study [88]. This model included age, blood pressure, proteinuria, eGFR at renal biopsy, the histologic score (MEST-C), using RAS inhibitors at renal biopsy, using corticosteroids at renal biopsy and racial characteristics. This model has been validated in several studies [89–91]; however, this clinical prediction model is intended for use at the point of diagnosis. Therefore, the limitation of this model may not reflect the effect of treatment after biopsy.

Moreover, the above-mentioned prediction model does not include the status of hematuria. Although the importance of proteinuria during the clinical course of IgAN has been well discussed by several studies [92–94], recent cohort studies and a meta-analysis have also demonstrated the importance of hematuria [95–97]. A retrospective cohort study using medical data from 1203626 young armed forces employees aged 16 through 25 years in Israeli revealed that persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria is a significant risk for ESRD especially for adolescents and young adults [98]. Furthermore, a recent analysis of a 10-year follow-up cohort study including 684 IgAN patients showed the clinicopathological manifestation of patients with persistent high-degree hematuria was more severe, and the prognosis was worse than for those with persistent low-degree hematuria [99]. Therefore, hematuria may be an indicator of early diagnosis of IgAN. At the same time, it reflects the disease activity of IgAN and would be one of the therapeutic indexes. Further large cohort observational study is needed to evaluate these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the disease definition of IgAN is simple, the clinical manifestations are widely variable. Moreover, the screening system, diagnostic strategies and management also vary internationally. Nowadays, several disease-specific therapies for IgAN are being investigated and are expected to become available in the near future. Understanding the ethnic variance of IgAN is essential to establish individualized management.

Contributor Information

Mingfeng Lee, Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Hitoshi Suzuki, Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Yoshihito Nihei, Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Keiichi Matsuzaki, Department of Public Health, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

Yusuke Suzuki, Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

FUNDING

This paper was published as part of a supplement funded by an educational grant from Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1. D'Amico G. The commonest glomerulonephritis in the world: IgA nephropathy. Q J Med 1987;64:709–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Suzuki H, Yasutake J, Makita Yet al. IgA nephropathy and IgA vasculitis with nephritis have a shared feature involving galactose-deficient IgA1-oriented pathogenesis. Kidney Int 2018;93:700–5. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Suzuki H, Kiryluk K, Novak Jet al. The pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22:1795–803. 10.1681/ASN.2011050464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gharavi AG, Yan Y, Scolari Fet al. IgA nephropathy, the most common cause of glomerulonephritis, is linked to 6q22-23. Nat Genet 2000;26:354–7. 10.1038/81677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bisceglia L, Cerullo G, Forabosco Pet al. Genetic heterogeneity in Italian families with IgA nephropathy: suggestive linkage for two novel IgA nephropathy loci. Am J Hum Genet 2006;79:1130–4. 10.1086/510135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Yeo SC, Goh SM, Barratt J.. Is immunoglobulin A nephropathy different in different ethnic populations? Nephrology (Carlton) 2019;24:885–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. McGrogan A, Franssen CF, de Vries CS.. The incidence of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide: a systematic review of the literature. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:414–30. 10.1093/ndt/gfq665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Schena FP, Nistor I.. Epidemiology of IgA nephropathy: a global perspective. Semin Nephrol 2018;38:435–42. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sugiyama H, Yokoyama H, Sato Het al. Japan renal biopsy registry and Japan kidney disease registry: committee report for 2009 and 2010. Clin Exp Nephrol 2013;17:155–73. 10.1007/s10157-012-0746-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Moranne O, Watier L, Rossert Jet al. Primary glomerulonephritis: an update on renal survival and determinants of progression. QJM 2008;101:215–24. 10.1093/qjmed/hcm142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. McQuarrie EP, Mackinnon B, McNeice Vet al. The incidence of biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy is associated with multiple socioeconomic deprivation. Kidney Int 2014;85:198–203. 10.1038/ki.2013.329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. O'Shaughnessy MM, Hogan SL, Thompson BDet al. Glomerular disease frequencies by race, sex and region: results from the International Kidney Biopsy Survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018;33:661–9. 10.1093/ndt/gfx189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nationwide and long-term survey of primary glomerulonephritis in Japan as observed in 1,850 biopsied cases . Research Group on Progressive Chronic Renal Disease. Nephron 1999;82:205–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhou FD, Zhao MH, Zou WZet al. The changing spectrum of primary glomerular diseases within 15 years: a survey of 3331 patients in a single Chinese centre. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:870–6. 10.1093/ndt/gfn554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Braun N, Schweisfurth A, Lohöfener Cet al. Epidemiology of glomerulonephritis in Northern Germany. Int Urol Nephrol 2011;43:1117–26. 10.1007/s11255-011-9955-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Habib MA, Badruddoza SM.. Pattern of glomerular diseases among adults in Rajshahi, the Northern Region of Bangladesh. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012;23:876–80. 10.4103/1319-2442.98195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Das U, Dakshinamurty KV, Prayaga A.. Pattern of biopsy-proven renal disease in a single center of south India: 19 years experience. Indian J Nephrol 2011;21:250–7. 10.4103/0971-4065.85482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Okpechi IG, Ameh OI, Bello AKet al. Epidemiology of histologically proven glomerulonephritis in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152203. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yamagata K, Iseki K, Nitta Ket al. Chronic kidney disease perspectives in Japan and the importance of urinalysis screening. Clin Exp Nephrol 2008;12:1–8. 10.1007/s10157-007-0010-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cho BS, Kim SD.. School urinalysis screening in Korea. Nephrology (Carlton) 2007;12Suppl 3:S3–7. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00873.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sheih CP, Liu MB, Hung CSet al. Renal abnormalities in schoolchildren. Pediatrics 1989;84:1086–90. 10.1542/peds.84.6.1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ramirez SP, Hsu SI, McClellan W.. Low body weight is a risk factor for proteinuria in multiracial Southeast Asian pediatric population. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:1045–54. 10.1053/ajkd.2001.28596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hogg RJ. Screening for CKD in children: a global controversy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:509–15. 10.2215/CJN.01210308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Deng W, Tan X, Zhou Qet al. Gender-related differences in clinicopathological characteristics and renal outcomes of Chinese patients with IgA nephropathy. BMC Nephrol 2018;19:31. 10.1186/s12882-018-0829-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Moriyama T, Karasawa K, Miyabe Yet al. Validation of the revised Oxford classification for IgA nephropathy considering treatment with corticosteroids/immunosuppressors. Sci Rep 2020;10:11151. 10.1038/s41598-020-68087-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Geddes CC, Rauta V, Gronhagen-Riska Cet al. A tricontinental view of IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:1541–8. 10.1093/ndt/gfg207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wyatt RJ, Julian BA, Baehler RWet al. Epidemiology of IgA nephropathy in central and eastern Kentucky for the period 1975 through 1994. Central Kentucky Region of the Southeastern United States IgA nephropathy DATABANK Project. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998;9:853–8. 10.1681/ASN.V95853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kiryluk K, Novak J, Gharavi AG.. Pathogenesis of immunoglobulin A nephropathy: recent insight from genetic studies. Annu Rev Med 2013;64:339–56. 10.1146/annurev-med-041811-142014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Floege J, Feehally J.. The mucosa-kidney axis in IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016;12:147–56. 10.1038/nrneph.2015.208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sanchez-Russo L, Rajasekaran A, Bin Set al. The gut and kidney crosstalk in immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney360 2022;3:1630–9. 10.34067/KID.0002382022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kawabe M, Yamamoto I, Yamakawa Tet al. Association between galactose-deficient IgA1 derived from the tonsils and recurrence of IgA nephropathy in patients who underwent kidney transplantation. Front Immunol 2020;11:2068. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kiryluk K, Li Y, Scolari Fet al. Discovery of new risk loci for IgA nephropathy implicates genes involved in immunity against intestinal pathogens. Nat Genet 2014;46:1187–96. 10.1038/ng.3118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kano T, Suzuki H, Makita Yet al. Mucosal immune system dysregulation in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Biomedicines 2022;10:3027. 10.3390/biomedicines10123027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Komatsu H, Fujimoto S, Hara Set al. Effect of tonsillectomy plus steroid pulse therapy on clinical remission of IgA nephropathy: a controlled study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1301–7. 10.2215/CJN.00310108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hirano K, Amano H, Kawamura Tet al. Tonsillectomy reduces recurrence of IgA nephropathy in mesangial hypercellularity type categorized by the Oxford classification. Clin Exp Nephrol 2016;20:425–32. 10.1007/s10157-015-1170-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yang D, He L, Peng Xet al. The efficacy of tonsillectomy on clinical remission and relapse in patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Ren Fail 2016;38:242–8. 10.3109/0886022X.2015.1128251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chen Y, Tang Z, Wang Qet al. Long-term efficacy of tonsillectomy in Chinese patients with IgA nephropathy. Am J Nephrol 2007;27:170–5. 10.1159/000100431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hirano K, Matsuzaki K, Yasuda Tet al. Association between tonsillectomy and outcomes in patients with Immunoglobulin A nephropathy. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e194772. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Duan J, Liu D, Duan Get al. Long-term efficacy of tonsillectomy as a treatment in patients with IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2017;49:103–12. 10.1007/s11255-016-1432-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Welander A, Sundelin B, Fored Met al. Increased risk of IgA nephropathy among individuals with celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013;47:678–83. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318284792e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Joher N, Gosset C, Guerrot Det al. Immunoglobulin A nephropathy in association with inflammatory bowel diseases: results from a national study and systematic literature review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022;37:531–9. 10.1093/ndt/gfaa378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Suzuki Y, Monteiro RC, Coppo Ret al. The phenotypic difference of IgA nephropathy and its race/gender-dependent molecular mechanisms. Kidney360 2021;2:1339–48. 10.34067/KID.0002972021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Coppo R. The gut-kidney axis in IgA nephropathy: role of microbiota and diet on genetic predisposition. Pediatr Nephrol 2018;33:53–61. 10.1007/s00467-017-3652-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fellström BC, Barratt J, Cook Het al. Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet North Am Ed 2017;389:2117–27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30550-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Barratt J, Lafayette R, Kristensen Jet al. Results from part A of the multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled NefIgArd trial, which evaluated targeted-release formulation of budesonide for the treatment of primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney Int 2023;103:391–402. 10.1016/j.kint.2022.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kovács T, Vas T, Kövesdy CPet al. Effect of tonsillectomy and its timing on renal outcomes in Caucasian IgA nephropathy patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2014;46:2175–82. 10.1007/s11255-014-0818-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zhang YM, Zhou XJ, Zhang H.. What genetics tells us about the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy: the role of immune factors and infection. Kidney Int Rep 2017;2:318–31. 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Gharavi AG, Kiryluk K, Choi Met al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for IgA nephropathy. Nat Genet 2011;43:321–7. 10.1038/ng.787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kiryluk K, Li Y, Sanna-Cherchi Set al. Geographic differences in genetic susceptibility to IgA nephropathy: GWAS replication study and geospatial risk analysis. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002765. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Li M, Wang L, Shi DCet al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies three novel susceptibility loci and reveals ethnic heterogeneity of genetic susceptibility for IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;31:2949–63. 10.1681/ASN.2019080799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kiryluk K, Li Y, Moldoveanu Zet al. GWAS for serum galactose-deficient IgA1 implicates critical genes of the O-glycosylation pathway. PLoS Genet 2017;13:e1006609. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Murakami M, Hayakawa M, Yanagihara Tet al. Proteinuria screening for children. Kidney Int Suppl 2005;94:S23–7. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09406.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yamagata K, Takahashi H, Suzuki Set al. Age distribution and yearly changes in the incidence of ESRD in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;43:433–43. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Iseki K, Asahi K, Moriyama Tet al. Risk factor profiles based on estimated glomerular filtration rate and dipstick proteinuria among participants of the Specific Health Check and Guidance System in Japan 2008. Clin Exp Nephrol 2012;16:244–9. 10.1007/s10157-011-0551-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Okubo R, Hoshi SL, Kimura Tet al. Cost-effectiveness of mass screening for dipstick hematuria in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol 2022;26:398–412. 10.1007/s10157-021-02170-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kondo M, Yamagata K, Hoshi SLet al. Cost-effectiveness of chronic kidney disease mass screening test in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol 2012;16:279–91. 10.1007/s10157-011-0567-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ishida M, Matsuzaki K, Suzuki Het al. Association between 3-year repetitive isolated hematuria and eGFR deterioration in an apparently healthy population: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:11466. 10.3390/ijerph191811466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Matsuzaki K, Ohigashi T, Sozu Tet al. Identification of high-risk groups in urinalysis: lessons from the longitudinal analysis of annual check-ups. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:1704. 10.3390/healthcare10091704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lin CY, Sheng CC, Lin CCet al. Mass urinary screening and follow-up for school children in Taiwan Province. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2001;42:134–40 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lin CY, Hsieh CC, Chen WPet al. The underlying diseases and follow-up in Taiwanese children screened by urinalysis. Pediatr Nephrol 2001;16:232–7. 10.1007/s004670000529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yanagawa H, Suzuki H, Suzuki Yet al. A panel of serum biomarkers differentiates IgA nephropathy from other renal diseases. PLoS One 2014;9:e98081. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Suzuki Y, Matsuzaki K, Suzuki Het al. Serum levels of galactose-deficient immunoglobulin (Ig) A1 and related immune complex are associated with disease activity of IgA nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol 2014;18:770–7. 10.1007/s10157-013-0921-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Fukao Y, Suzuki H, Kim JSet al. Galactose-deficient IgA1 as a candidate urinary marker of IgA nephropathy. J Clin Med 2022;11:3173. 10.3390/jcm11113173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Nihei Y, Haniuda K, Higashiyama Met al. Identification of IgA autoantibodies targeting mesangial cells redefines the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Sci Adv 2023;9:eadd6734. 10.1126/sciadv.add6734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Ishida M, Matsuzaki K, Ikai Het al. Cost analysis of screening for IgA nephropathy using novel biomarkers. Value Health Reg Issues 2022;29:8–15. 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Trimarchi H, Barratt J, Cattran DCet al. Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group. Kidney Int 2017;91:1014–21. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Katafuchi R, Ninomiya T, Nagata Met al. Validation study of oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: the significance of extracapillary proliferation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:2806–13. 10.2215/CJN.02890311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Zeng CH, Le W, Ni Zet al. A multicenter application and evaluation of the oxford classification of IgA nephropathy in adult Chinese patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;60:812–20. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Alamartine E, Sauron C, Laurent Bet al. The use of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy to predict renal survival. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;6:2384–8. 10.2215/CJN.01170211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Edström Halling S, Söderberg MP, Berg UB.. Predictors of outcome in paediatric IgA nephropathy with regard to clinical and histopathological variables (Oxford classification). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:715–22. 10.1093/ndt/gfr339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Rovin BH, Adler SG, Barratt Jet al. Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Guideline for the management of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 2021;100:753–79. 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Tesar V, Troyanov S, Bellur Set al. Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective analysis from the VALIGA study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:2248–58. 10.1681/ASN.2014070697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Matsuzaki K, Suzuki Y, Nakata Jet al. Nationwide survey on current treatments for IgA nephropathy in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol 2013;17:827–33. 10.1007/s10157-013-0779-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner Cet al. Intensive supportive care plus immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2225–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Lv J, Zhang H, Wong MGet al. Effect of oral methylprednisolone on clinical outcomes in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:432–42. 10.1001/jama.2017.9362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kawamura T, Yoshimura M, Miyazaki Yet al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of tonsillectomy combined with steroid pulse therapy in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:1546–53. 10.1093/ndt/gfu020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Hotta O, Miyazaki M, Furuta Tet al. Tonsillectomy and steroid pulse therapy significantly impact on clinical remission in patients with IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:736–43. 10.1053/ajkd.2001.27690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Wong MG, Lv J, Hladunewich MAet al. The therapeutic evaluation of steroids in IgA nephropathy global (TESTING) study: trial design and baseline characteristics. Am J Nephrol 2021;52:827–36. 10.1159/000519812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Lv J, Wong MG, Hladunewich MAet al. Effect of oral methylprednisolone on decline in kidney function or kidney failure in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2022;327:1888–98. 10.1001/jama.2022.5368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Smerud HK, Bárány P, Lindström Ket al. New treatment for IgA nephropathy: enteric budesonide targeted to the ileocecal region ameliorates proteinuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26:3237–42. 10.1093/ndt/gfr052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Hou JH, Le WB, Chen Net al. Mycophenolate mofetil combined with prednisone versus full-dose prednisone in IgA nephropathy with active proliferative lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2017;69:788–95. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Hogg RJ, Bay RC, Jennette JCet al. Randomized controlled trial of mycophenolate mofetil in children, adolescents, and adults with IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 2015;66:783–91. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Liu LJ, Yang YZ, Shi SFet al. Effects of hydroxychloroquine on proteinuria in IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2019;74:15–22. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Masakane I, Nakai S, Ogata Set al. Annual dialysis data report 2014, JSDT Renal Data Registry (JRDR). Ren Replace Ther 2017;3:18. 10.1186/s41100-017-0097-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Feehally J, Coppo R, Troyanov Set al. Tonsillectomy in a European cohort of 1,147 patients with IgA nephropathy. Nephron 2016;132:15–24. 10.1159/000441852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Barbour SJ, Cattran DC, Kim SJet al. Individuals of Pacific Asian origin with IgA nephropathy have an increased risk of progression to end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2013;84:1017–24. 10.1038/ki.2013.210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Gutiérrez E, Zamora I, Ballarín JAet al. Long-term outcomes of IgA nephropathy presenting with minimal or no proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;23:1753–60. 10.1681/ASN.2012010063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Barbour SJ, Coppo R, Zhang Het al. Evaluating a new international risk-prediction tool in IgA nephropathy. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:942–52. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zhang Y, Guo L, Wang Zet al. External validation of international risk-prediction models of IgA nephropathy in an Asian-Caucasian cohort. Kidney Int Rep 2020;5:1753–63. 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Ouyang Y, Zhao Z, Li Get al. A validation study comparing risk prediction models of IgA nephropathy. Front Immunol 2021;12:753901. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.753901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Papasotiriou M, Stangou M, Chlorogiannis Det al. Validation of the international IgA nephropathy prediction tool in the Greek registry of IgA nephropathy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:778464. 10.3389/fmed.2022.778464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Reich HN, Troyanov S, Scholey JWet al. Remission of proteinuria improves prognosis in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:3177–83. 10.1681/ASN.2007050526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Le W, Liang S, Hu Yet al. Long-term renal survival and related risk factors in patients with IgA nephropathy: results from a cohort of 1155 cases in a Chinese adult population. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:1479–85. 10.1093/ndt/gfr527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Canney M, Barbour SJ, Zheng Yet al. Quantifying duration of proteinuria remission and association with clinical outcome in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021;32:436–47. 10.1681/ASN.2020030349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Sevillano AM, Gutiérrez E, Yuste Cet al. Remission of hematuria improves renal survival in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017;28:3089–99. 10.1681/ASN.2017010108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Yu GZ, Guo L, Dong JFet al. Persistent hematuria and kidney disease progression in IgA nephropathy: a cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2020;76:90–9. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. He P, Wang H, Huang Cet al. Hematuria was a high risk for renal progression and ESRD in immunoglobulin a nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Fail 2021;43:488–99. 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1879852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Vivante A, Afek A, Frenkel-Nir Yet al. Persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria in Israeli adolescents and young adults and risk for end-stage renal disease. JAMA 2011;306:729–36. 10.1001/jama.2011.1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Huang Z, Zhang J, Chen Bet al. Clinical significance of persistent hematuria degrees in primary IgA nephropathy: a propensity score-matched analysis of a 10-year follow-up cohort. Am J Nephrol 2023;54:62–73. 10.1159/000529650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were generated or analyzed in support of this research.


Articles from Clinical Kidney Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES