Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for 80%–85% of total cases and leading to millions of deaths worldwide. Drug resistance is the primary cause of treatment failure in NSCLC, which urges scientists to develop advanced approaches for NSCLC treatment. Among novel approaches, the miRNA-based method has emerged as a potential approach as it allows researchers to modulate target gene expression. Subsequently, cell behaviors are altered, which leads to the death and the depletion of cancer cells. It has been reported that miRNAs possess the capacity to regulate multiple genes that are involved in various signaling pathways, including the phosphoinositide 3-kinase, receptor tyrosine kinase/rat sarcoma virus/mitogen-activated protein kinase, wingless/integrated, retinoblastoma, p53, transforming growth factor β, and nuclear factor-kappa B pathways. Dysregulation of these signaling pathways in NSCLC results in abnormal cell proliferation, tissue invasion, and drug resistance while inhibiting apoptosis. Thus, understanding the roles of miRNAs in regulating these signaling pathways may enable the development of novel NSCLC treatment therapies. However, a comprehensive review of potential miRNAs in NSCLC treatment has been lacking. Therefore, this review aims to fill the gap by summarizing the up-to-date information on miRNAs regarding their targets, impact on cancer-associated pathways, and prospective outcomes in treating NSCLC. We also discuss current technologies for delivering miRNAs to the target cells, including virus-based, non-viral, and emerging extracellular vesicle-based delivery systems. This knowledge will support future studies to develop an innovative miRNA-based therapy and select a suitable carrier to treat NSCLC effectively.
Keywords: miRNAs, Non-small cell lung cancer, miRNA-based therapy, miRNA delivery systems
1. Introduction
Lung cancer is a severe health issue with abnormal lung cell growth [1]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, with a poor prognosis and the absence of a definitive cure [2]. Besides smoking and air pollution, genetic factors such as genetic mutations significantly contribute to the development of NSCLC [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. Mutations in either proto-oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes can trigger cancer development [[7], [8], [9]]. Therefore, investigating the role of these genes and involved signaling pathways is essential to develop effective target therapies for NSCLC. In the past decades, scientists have discovered a wide range of mutant genes, many of which are components of cellular signaling pathways contributing to NSCLC development and progression. These pathways include the PI3K, RTK/RAS/MAPK, WNT, RB, p53, TGF-β, and NF-κB signaling pathways. Their functions in NSCLC formation are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Signaling pathways contribute to NSCLC development and progression.
| Pathway | Proliferation | Apoptosis | Metastasis | Invasion | Angiogenesis | Chemoresistance | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PI3K | Promote | Inhibit | Promote | Promote | Promote | Promote | [[10], [11], [12]] |
| RTK/RAS/MAPK | Promote | Inhibit | Promote | Promote | – | Promote | [13,14] |
| WNT | Promote | Inhibit | Promote | Promote | – | Promote | [[15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]] |
| RB | Inhibit | Promote | – | – | – | – | [22] |
| p53 | Dual role | Dual role | Dual role | Dual role | – | Dual role | [23,24] |
| TGF-β | Dual role | Dual role | Promote | Promote | Promote | – | [[25], [26], [27], [28]] |
| NF-κB | Dual role | Dual role | Promote | Promote | – | Promote | [[29], [30], [31]] |
The current standard treatment approaches applied for NSCLC, depending on the stage, include (1) surgery (for stages I, II, and IIIA - with adjuvant systemic therapy when appropriate); (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, followed by surgery (for stage III); and (3) immunotherapy (for stages III and IV) [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. For distant metastases (stage IV), target therapy and immunotherapy could be considered for a specific driver mutation [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. Surgical resection is typically the first choice and could effectively cure NSCLC patients in stages I and II; however, the recurrence rate after surgery is relatively high (ranging from 30% to 55%) [37,38]. Likewise, although chemo and radiotherapy may effectively inhibit cancer progression, they still have many side effects, such as sickness, hair loss, and diarrhea [[39], [40], [41]]. These conventional approaches not only damage cancer cells but also destroy healthy cells. Additionally, previous studies have revealed that malignant tumors could resist chemo-radiotherapy, resulting in more aggressive cancer progression [[42], [43], [44], [45]]. Therefore, discovering novel therapies that could overcome these drawbacks is necessary to improve the treatment efficiency and survival rate of NSCLC patients [[46], [47], [48]].
Previous studies have shown that mutations in either proto-oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes can lead to cancer development; thus, developing therapy targeting mutated genes could effectively cure cancer [[8], [10], [48], [49], [50]]. In fact, thousands of studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel gene therapies, such as gene transfer, gene silencing, gene editing, oncolytic virotherapy, and immunotherapy [[51], [52], [53]]. Among those, the RNA interference (RNAi) strategy has drawn the attention of scientists due to its ability to target specific mRNAs without immunogenicity and low toxicity [54,55]. Between two types of small non-coding RNA (siRNAs and miRNAs), miRNAs could target multiple mRNAs simultaneously, which makes them powerful at modulating multiple disease pathways [[56], [57], [58], [59]].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs with 18–25 nucleotides in length [56,58,59]. Their therapeutic effects rely on their capacity to bind to specific sequences on targeted mRNAs, thereby modulating post-transcriptional processes in different manners [60,61]. To be more specific, miRNAs bind to the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR) of targeted mRNAs encoding for proteins involved in cancer-related signaling pathways. This binding results in the inhibition of proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and angiogenesis, the induction of apoptosis, and the enhancement of chemo-radio sensitivity of NSCLC cells [[62], [63], [64]]. Compared with other gene therapy strategies, miRNAs are more advanced and biosafe. They only impact the post-transcriptional regulation of target genes, thereby minimizing the potential risk of tumorigenesis associated with off-target gene integration or unwanted immune system responses [53,65]. Furthermore, miRNAs' delivery efficiency and targeting ability could be significantly increased thanks to the application of advanced nanotechnologies in miRNA carriers [[66], [67], [68]]. For instance, MRX34, a liposome formulation of miR-34a, had been introduced to clinical trial in humans (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829971) due to its capacity to significantly reduce cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in various cancer types, such as liver cancer [69], head and neck squamous carcinoma, thyroid cancer [70], and melanoma [71]. Additionally, Targomir drug, which comprises synthetic miR-16 mimics encapsulated by a bacterial minicell system, has also entered clinical trials for treating thoracic cancer [72]. These clinical trials serve as compelling evidence of the potential utility of miRNAs in cancer treatment, not only for the aforementioned cancer types but also for NSCLC. In this review, we highlight miRNAs targeting NSCLC tissue and insights into their targets and delivery systems to devise innovative strategies for NSCLC treatment.
2. MiRNAs as therapeutic agents for NSCLC
As mentioned above, miRNAs can serve as either oncogenic agents or tumor suppressors depending on the proteins encoded by their target mRNAs [73]. Thus, miRNA expression is tightly associated with cancer-associated signaling pathways and understanding the complex interplay between miRNAs and their target pathways could help researchers design more effective miRNA-based drugs to combat NSCLC.
2.1. Association of miRNAs with oncogenic signaling pathways
2.1.1. PI3K signaling pathway
The PI3K pathway is one of the most significant intracellular pathways that govern multiple cancer-related events, such as tumor proliferation, growth, and survival [11]. Key proteins of this pathway include phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), PI3K, Ak strain transforming (AKT), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) [11]. Dysregulation of this pathway commonly arises from mutations in susceptible genes of the kinases, reduced expression and activity of tumor suppressor gene PTEN, amplification of PI3K, and the activation of tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors or upstream oncogenes that interact with PI3K [10,[74], [75], [76]]. This oncogenic dysregulation of PI3K pathway leads to the development of various human cancer types by initiating abnormal processes like cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), chemoresistance, and apoptosis [11,12].
Recently, researchers have investigated the roles of miRNAs in regulating PI3K pathway-related NSCLC progression. For instance, Song et al. (2016) used miRNA-126 to target PI3K in order to increase PTEN expression; and subsequently reduced AKT phosphorylation [77]. This approach successfully suppressed A549 cell proliferation, metastasis, and invasion [77]. Another in vivo study has also shown that miRNA-126-encapsulated exosomes could inhibit NSCLC growth and metastasis, leading to a reduced number of metastatic lung nodes in nude mouse models [78]. Additionally, the overexpression of miRNA-133b and miRNA-145 diminished epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression; hence reducing PI3K, AKT, and cyclin D1 (CCND1) levels while inducing Bax protein expression in A549 cells [79,80]. Thereby, miRNA-133b and miRNA-145 could inhibit this cell line from proliferating while inducing apoptosis [79,80]. Another critical protein of this pathway is mTOR, which plays an essential role in cell proliferation, metastasis, and especially radio sensitivity [81,82]. mTOR expression was reported to be inhibited by miRNA-99a and miRNA-101-3p, resulting in the increase of radio sensitivity of A549 cells both in vitro and in vivo [82,83]. These preliminary pieces of evidence suggest that miRNAs (Fig. 1) could control NSCLC development through influencing the expression of various genes in PI3K signaling pathway.
Fig. 1.
Therapeutic targets and prospective outcomes of miRNAs modulating the PI3K pathway in NSCLC treatment. Legend: These miRNAs downregulate the expression of key oncogenes, such as EGFR, PI3K, AKT, mTOR, and their downstream genes within the PI3K pathway, leading to the inhibition of cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and angiogenesis while promoting apoptosis of NSCLC [49,57,77,79,80,[84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106], [107], [108], [109], [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117], [118], [119], [120], [121]].
2.1.2. RTK/RAS/MAPK signaling pathway
The RTK/RAS/MAPK signaling pathway is another primary oncogenic pathway that highly altered in lung cancer patients [122]. This pathway regulates cell proliferation by receiving extracellular signals through receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and subsequently activating its sub-pathways, such as the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK), and rat sarcoma virus/rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAS/RAF), via a cascade of intracellular signal (Fig. 2) [14,[123], [124], [125], [126]]. Together, these sub-pathways govern processes like cellular proliferation, migration, and apoptosis [13,14].
Fig. 2.
miRNA-mediated silencing of oncogenes in the RTK/RAS/MAPK signaling pathway for NSCLC treatment. Legend: Aberrant activation of the RTK/RAS/MAPK signaling pathway can lead to NSCLC formation. However, these tumor suppressor miRNAs targeting oncogenic mRNAs within this pathway, like mRNAs of EGFR, STAT, and MAPK, robustly suppresses NSCLC proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and chemoresistance [127,128,129,[130], [131], [132], [133], [134], [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141], [142], [143], [144]].
The JAK/STAT pathway includes three major components: RTK, JAK, and STAT, with STAT3 (a member of STAT family) acting as a transcription factor that activates cell cycle-regulated genes in the nucleus [124,145]. In lung cancer, STAT3 is constitutively activated, which promotes survival and treatment resistance [146]. Based on these findings, miRNA-202 and miRNA-454 were used to target STAT3 mRNA’s 3′UTR region, preventing its translation and then successful inhibiting proliferation, migration, and invasion in A549 and H1299 cell lines [127,128]. Similarly, Sun et al. (2016) have demonstrated that miRNA-9600 augmented paclitaxel and cisplatin sensitivity by downregulating STAT3 and promoting chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in nude mice models [147]. Another study reported that the MAPK/ERK pathway impacts carcinogenesis and treatment resistance of NSCLC cells by driving proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis; thus, targeting members of this pathway is considered a potential therapy for NSCLC [148]. In detail, silencing mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 9 (MAP3K9) by miRNA-148a–3p significantly suppressed tumor development, cytoskeleton remodeling, and EMT process in A549 and NCI-H1299 cells [129]. In addition, the RAS/RAF sub-pathway, is frequently activated abnormally in several cancers, including NSCLC [149]. Researchers have found that using miR-135 not only effectively inhibited RAB1B protein expression but also led to reduced levels of its interacting protein RAS and other components of the RAS/RAF pathway [[150], [151], [152]]. As a result, the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of NSCLC cells were strongly suppressed [152]. These results indicate that certain miRNAs (Fig. 2) could improve the outcome of NSCLC cancer treatment by silencing oncogenes in RTK/RAS/MAPK pathway.
2.1.3. WNT signaling pathway
The WNT signaling pathway consists of the WNT/β-catenin dependent sub-pathway and the non-canonical β-catenin independent sub-pathway. It plays a crucial role in transmitting extracellular signals to regulate various intracellular processes, including cell motility, cell polarity, cell proliferation, and differentiation [[17], [18], [19], [20]]. Recent studies have also highlighted the significant impact of this pathway on NSCLC oncogenesis, drug resistance [21], and stem cell self-renewability [[153], [154], [155]]. Therefore, targeting key components of this pathway (e.g., WNT and β-catenin) is a critical strategy in NSCLC control both in vitro and in vivo [21]. Notably, Liu et al. (2018) and Wang et al. (2018) identified miRNA-1253 and miRNA-577 as tumor suppressors that directly downregulate WNT5A and WNT2A respectively, subsequently inhibiting lung cancer cell’s proliferation, migration, and EMT process [156,157]. There are two strategies to inhibit β-catenin expression using miRNAs: direct targeting β-catenin or indirect targeting its upstream genes. For examples, miRNA-512-5p mimics was introduced into A549 cells to target β-catenin [158], while miR-100 and miR-625 was employed to target HOX transcription factors (upstream genes of B-catenin), in NSCLC treatment [159,160]. Both strategies led to reduced β-catenin levels and subsequently affected the expression of its downstream genes, including CCND1, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), c-Myc and notably, EMT-related genes such as E-cadherin, N-cadherin and Vimentin (Fig. 3) [[158], [159], [160]]. As a result, these miRNAs could significantly inhibit NSCLC cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and promote apoptosis, both in vitro and in vivo [[158], [159], [160]]. In summary, using tumor suppressor miRNAs (Fig. 3) to target and disrupt the activation of the WNT signaling pathway offers a promising tool for NSCLC treatment.
Fig. 3.
The potential of miRNA in deactivating the WNT signaling pathway for treating NSCLC. Legend: These miRNAs inhibit the activation of the WNT signaling pathway in NSCLC, which results in the inhibition of cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and the promotion of apoptosis, both in vitro and in vivo [117,156,157,[159], [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [171], [172], [173]].
2.2. Participation of miRNAs in anti-tumorigenic RB signaling pathways
The RB pathway plays a central role in regulating cell cycle progression and cell death by either activating or inhibiting its components, including RB, cyclin (CCD), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), and E2F-family transcription factors [22]. When CCN associates with its specific CDK, this complex then phosphorylates and inactivates RB proteins, leading to the expression of E2F1/3 for G1/S transition [174]. There are three primary mechanisms through which the RB pathway is inactivated in cancers that exhibit deregulated E2F1/3 activity: (1) loss of RB protein function, (2) overexpression of CDK, and (3) loss of CDK inhibitors [175]. Thus, inhibiting the overexpression of these oncogenic proteins (CCN, CDK, and E2F1/3) in tumor cells could be considered a novel therapeutic approach for NSCLC [22].
Researchers have shown that CCND2 mRNA was a direct target of miRNA-671-3p and miRNA-646; hence, the overexpression of these miRNAs significantly suppressed CCND2 levels, then inhibiting proliferation and invasion of NSCLC cells [87,176]. Additionally, low levels of miRNA-34b-3p and miRNA-340 were detected in NSCLC and were found to be positively correlated with metastasis and tumor size. Therefore, introducing these miRNAs into cancer cells proved effective in suppressing proliferation, inducing cell cycle arrest, and promoting apoptosis in NSCLC cell [177,178]. Overexpression of E2F transcription factor 3 (E2F3) is also frequently found in several cancer types, including NSCLC [179]. Thus, Liu et al. (2018) used miRNA-433 to downregulate E2F3 expression, significantly reducing the proliferation and invasion of both A549 and H460 cells [180]. These results suggest the potential of specific miRNAs (Fig. 4) in targeting RB signaling pathway components to suppress cell proliferation, migration, and invasion while promoting apoptosis in NSCLC.
Fig. 4.
MiRNAs targeting oncogenes in RB signaling pathway to combat NSCLC progression. Legend: The RB pathway serves as a basic anti-tumorigenic pathway. Thus, introducing these anti-tumor miRNAs targeting the RB pathway could significantly reduce NSCLC malignancy [87,[176], [177], [178],[180], [181], [182], [183], [184], [185], [186]].
2.3. MiRNAs are involved in the signaling pathways with dual effects on tumorigenesis
2.3.1. p53 signaling pathway
P53 pathway plays crucial roles in regulating cellular responses to stress signals, like DNA damage repair, cell cycle arrest, aberrant proliferation, and apoptosis promotion [24]. The key factor, p53, protects the DNA integrity by undergoing various post-translational modifications and activating the transcription of specific genes involved in cell responses to various stress types [187,188]. Under normal physiological state, p53 is tightly regulated through polyubiquitination mediated by murine double minute 2 (MDM2) [24]. When cells are exposed to stress, inhibition of p53 by MDM2 is blocked, allowing p53 to govern a wide range of cellular responses via the transactivation of its downstream genes [24]. However, this strict regulation is disrupted in cancer cells due to mutations in both TP53 and its regulator [189,190]. Besides the loss of function mutation, which extremely widespread in human cancers, scientists recently discovered that TP53 also has a gain of function mutation that makes it accumulate to very high levels in cancer cells and drives lung oncogenesis [23]. Therefore, maintaining a normal level of p53 protein is essential for cancer treatment.
Supporting this idea, Cai et al. (2019) found that the translation of MDM2 was associated with low concentration of miRNA-1305 in NSCLC cells; hence, overexpressed miRNA-1305 substantially decreased proliferation and migration while promoting apoptosis of A549 and H460 cells [191]. Additionally, ribosomal protein L11 (RPL11) could prevent MDM2-mediated p53 degradation by interacting with MMD2 [192]. However, RPL11 activity is negatively controlled by ubiquitin-specific peptidase 47 (USP47) protein [193]. In this context, silencing USP47 mRNA by miRNA-101-3p could increase RPL11 level and then helped to reduce cancer cells by stabilizing p53 [192]. Overexpression of cyclin B1 (CCNB1), which initiates mitosis, is common in NSCLC cells and correlates with tumor differentiation and vascular invasion [194]. Hence, downregulating CCNB1, achieved by miRNAs like miRNA-718 or miRNA-139-5p, significantly suppressed NSCLC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and promoted apoptosis [184,185]. Given the importance of cell apoptosis regulation in cancer therapy, miRNA-based strategies to restore the normal p53 pathway (Fig. 5) have been vigorously pursued in recent years and pave the way for pre-clinical trials in cancer treatment [195].
Fig. 5.
MiRNAs participating in the p53 signaling pathway contribute to the suppression of NSCLC development. Legend: Alterations in p53 levels can have a significant impact on cell proliferation, including the initiation of NSCLC tumors. capability to restore the normal p53 pathway, resulting in the inhibition of NSCLC proliferation, growth, metastasis, and promotion of apoptosis [191,192,[196], [197], [198], [199], [200], [201], [202]].
2.3.2. TGF-β signaling pathway
The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway is critically involved in a wide range of cellular processes, including cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and cell-specific and tissue-specific motility [[26], [27], [28]]. In this pathway, TGF-β mediates numerous embryonic and adult signaling functions by binding to its receptor kinases to initiate downstream signaling of SMAD proteins, ubiquitin ligases, and/or intracellular protein kinases. These signals then govern gene-specific expression, RNA processing, and mRNA translation, resulting in the regulation of specific protein expression [28,[203], [204], [205]]. Depending on the stages, the TGF-β signaling pathway also has dual effects on cancer development [206]. In early stages, TGF-β functions as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell growth and inducing apoptosis, whereas in advanced stages, TGF-β becomes a powerful pro-metastasis factor that promotes the EMT process [[206], [207], [208]]. Therefore, the use of miRNAs to target and silence TGF-β proteins or their receptors holds promise for restricting the proliferation, metastasis, and invasion of advanced NSCLC.
This was demonstrated in NSCLCL cells and tissues through the work Liao et al. (2021), who used miRNA-454-3p to counter the overexpression of TGF-β2, and in studies by Li et al. (2017) and Yang et al. (2017), who employed miR-17-5p and miR-769-5p respectively to lower the expression of TGF-β receptors [[209], [210], [211]]. Not only TGF-β but also SMAD modifications, such as TGF-β-mediated SMAD activation or epigenetic modifications via miRNAs, contribute to NSCLC progression [212,213]. Based on the correlations between low levels of miR-433 and the overexpression of SMAD in NSCLC, Li et al. (2015) overexpressed this miRNA in NSCLC for therapeutic purposes [214]. This intervention downregulated SMAD2 protein as well as decreased the levels of CCND1, matrix metalloproteinases-2/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (MMP-2/TIMP-2), and MMP-9, which led to suppressing NSCLC proliferation, metastasis, and invasion [214]. Based on these data, several miRNAs (Fig. 6) could be used to rescue aberrant TGF-β signaling pathways in cancer progression and pull them back to the normal control state.
Fig. 6.
MiRNAs employed to rescue the normal state of dual-effected TGF-β signaling pathway in NSCLC tissues. Legend: Abnormal TGF-B overexpression can either inhibit or promote tumors, depending on the stage of cancer cells. Using these miRNAs to inhibit specific genes in this pathway may help suppress proliferation, metastasis, and invasion while promoting apoptosis in NSCLC cells [209,211,[214], [215], [216], [217], [218], [219], [220], [221], [222], [223], [224]].
2.3.3. NF-κB signaling pathway
NF-κB signaling pathway is one of the hot spots in cancer research, involved in inflammatory or immune responses, as well as regulation of cell differentiation, proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis [225,226]. Similar to the p53 and TGF-β signaling pathways, the NF-κB pathway exhibits dual roles in tumorigenesis [31]. However, its role in promoting cancer is generally more common and well-evidenced than the anti-tumorigenesis role. NF-κB has influence in tumor development and progression by excessive innate immunity activation, abnormal cell growth, and dysregulation of EMT-related transcription factors [[227], [228], [229]]. Mutations in upstream NF-κB effectors also activate NF-κB, and then specifically target the promoters of other oncogenes which leads to tumor malignancy [230]. Based on this knowledge, scientists sought to discover miRNAs (Fig. 7) that could reduce the expression of genes involved in the NF-κB pathway activation. For example, in a study by Huang et al. (2018), they have demonstrated that inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (ID1) overexpression led to the NF-κB pathway activation and using miRNA-381 to knockdown ID1 successfully inhibited NSCLC proliferation and growth, while promoting cisplatin sensitivity [231]. Besides, Jiang et al. (2020) found that silencing activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM), which is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, by miRNA-148 could suppress EMT through deregulating N-cadherin and vimentin, ultimately blocking the metastasis and invasion of NSCLC cells [232], https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1759-7714.13285. Similar outcomes were observed in studies where miRNA-449 and miRNA-379 targeted high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and conserved helix-loop-helix ubiquitous kinase (CHUK), respectively [233,234]. Besides aforementioned functions, several recent studies have suggest that NF-κB also operates as a tumor suppressor by activating the transcription of the Fas ligand [31]. However, there is a limited amount of research on the role of miRNAs in regulating this function of NF-κB.
Fig. 7.
MiRNAs involved in regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway to restore the normal state of NSCLC. Legend: The NF-κB signaling pathway regulates various cellular processes, and abnormalities in this pathway can contribute to cancer development. Utilizing these miRNAs to target and silence oncogenes within this pathway has shown promise in inhibiting cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and migration, while also inducing apoptosis of NSCLC [231,[233], [234], [235], [236], [237], [238], [239]].
2.4. Limitations of miRNAs in therapeutic uses
In NSCLC, miRNAs have shown important roles in mediating and regulating a variety of cancer-related pathways, which implicate their role in carcinogenesis, more importantly, the cancer therapeutic treatments [[240], [241], [242]]. However, utilizing miRNAs for clinical purposes has also faced lots of bottlenecks and limitations, including the intrinsic characteristics of miRNA, such as less stability and challenge to reproduce in miRNA preparations [[243], [244], [245]]. Other common barriers to miRNAs in clinical use are the complexity of identifying miRNA targets and discerning miRNA biological functions which results in mal-functional miRNAs or off-target effects [245,246]. Delivering miRNAs to specific targets is also challenging due to their journey through the circulatory system, potential immune cell phagocytosis, and endonuclease degradation, as well kidney filtration [246,247]. Furthermore, miRNA use can lead to adverse reactions, such as miRNA-mediated toxicity which disrupt specific gene expression and slowdown drug and toxicant metabolism [245,248]. For example, overexpression of miR-24 and miR-34a has been reported to inhibit the expression of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha, leading to decreased bile acid production via the cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase pathway [249].
In addition, miRNA may activate the innate immune response, causing a series of non-specific reactions, such as changes in length, structure, chemical modification of cellular signals, and cytokines production. Recent studies have shown that immunological activities triggered by miRNA reagents might be associated with the transcription of miRNA genes in epithelial cells, which involve the mediation of pathogen recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors [250,251]. Another primary concern is the dosage of therapeutic miRNAs for treatment purposes, as an overdose of miRNAs may increase off-target side effects, non-specific immune responses, and toxicity [61,246]. For example, the MRX34 clinical trial was closed because of immune-related toxicity, mainly associated with the properties of miR-34a mimics and the dosage used [252]. To enhance stability and biological activity, most commercial miRNA-based drugs undergo various chemical modifications or length adjustments. Therefore, it is essential to thoroughly evaluate different miRNA-derived drugs in terms of characteristics and dosages to achieve better efficacy and maximum biosafety for specific therapeutic applications.
3. Delivery tools for miRNA therapeutic approaches
MiRNAs are naked nucleic acids; hence, they can easily get degraded by nucleases or absorbed by macrophages, as well as trapped by the host immune system. In addition, the delivery of miRNAs to the targeted cells could pose another difficulty in developing miRNA-based therapy for cancer treatment. As a result, it is crucial to develop stable and effective vectors that can protect these cargoes and efficiently deliver them to the target cells. Several systems could fulfill the need for vector development (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.
Mechanism of delivering therapeutic miRNAs by current delivery tools into NSCLC cells to target cancer-related pathways. Legend: The most popular tools for delivering therapeutic miRNA to target cells include viral vectors and non-viral systems, such as polymer-based, lipid-based, EV-based delivery systems, and inorganic nanoparticles. These carriers can either form complexes with miRNA or encapsulate it for efficient transport to target cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Once released into the cytoplasm, these miRNAs interact with their target mRNAs to deactivate oncogenic proteins involved in seven common pathways, including PI3K, RTK/RAS/MAPK, WNT, RB, p53, TGF-β, and NF-κB pathways. Consequently, NSCLC proliferation, metastasis, metabolism, and treatment resistance are inhibited, while apoptosis is enhanced.
3.1. Virus-based vector system
One of those, a virus-based vector system, is a traditional tool for miRNA delivery, typically including retroviruses, lentiviruses, adenoviruses, or adeno-associated viruses (AVVs) [253,254]. Once the miRNA is cloned into the viral vector, the purified viral particles can be introduced into the target cells through various methods, such as tissue-direct injection or intravenous administration, to release the miRNAs [255,256]. Depending on the viral vector’s system used, the miRNA sequence may either integrate into the host cell’s genome (retroviruses and lentiviruses systems) [257,258] or exist as an episomal element (adenoviruses system) [51], allowing stable and long-lasting expression of miRNAs to regulate cancer cells' gene expression [254]. Several studies have shown that some miRNAs were significantly increased in virus-infected cells; for example, miRNA-138 has upregulated 1000 folds in retroviral-infected mouse embryonic fibroblasts to enhance induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming [198]. Among these viral vectors, oncolytic adenovirus is commonly used in cancer treatment owing to its commendably tumor-restricted replication abilities [259]. Thanks to this finding, Chang et al. (2013) successfully generated an oncolytic adenoviral vector named AdCN205, which overexpressed miR-34a and presented strong anti-tumorigenesis results [260]. Despite the high transfection and infection efficiency, viral vectors are limited in wide application due to their toxicity, immune system stimulation, and tissue degeneration [261].
3.2. Non-viral delivery systems
To avoid virus-based delivery’s limitations, nanoparticles (NPs), including gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), iron oxide nanoparticles, or organic nanoparticles such as liposomes, are widely used due to their straightforward synthesis and functionalization properties, especially low immunogenicity and cytotoxicity [[262], [263], [264]].
3.2.1. Polymeric nanocarriers
Polymeric nanocarriers, which have been widely studied for miRNA delivery, include three main systems of polyplexes, poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), and dendrimers [265,266]. MiRNAs can be loaded into these delivery systems by complexation through electrostatic interaction, direct conjugation by covalent linkers, or encapsulation during the nanoparticle formulation process [265,267]. These nanocarriers share a common mechanism for miRNA delivery, initiated by forming complexes between positive-charged polymers and miRNAs. These complexes can interact with either negative-charged cell membranes or specific proteins, thereby facilitating their cellular uptake through endocytosis [268]. Inside the cells, these complexes absorb protons from endosomes, leading to the disruption of endosomes and the release of them into the cytoplasm [269]. Once these complexes disassemble, miRNAs are liberated and then bind to target mRNAs to regulate gene expression in cancer-related cellular processes.
Polyethyleneimine (PEI), the most common type of polyplexes, was used to deliver miR-33a and miR-145 to colon carcinoma tissues in a mouse model, resulting in tumor proliferation reduction and cell apoptosis increase [270]. Another study used a three-layered polyplex of a PEI core, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) intermediate layer, and a folic acid-modified chitosan outer layer to systemically deliver miRNA-126 into lung cancer cells [271]. The results showed that this polyplex could efficiently deliver miRNA-126 and inhibit tumor growth in vivo [271]. PLGA NPs could increase their miRNA encapsulation efficiency by preparing with positively charged molecules like PEI or chitosan [272,273]. Arora et al. (2014) revealed that PLGA NPs loaded with miR-150 mimics and prepared with PEI could successfully deliver and release miR-150 mimics to pancreatic cancer cells to reduce cell migration and invasion [272]. By coated with the chondroitin sulfate, poly(amidoamine), the most common type of dendrimers, improved its targeting ability and successfully delivered miR-34a to pancreatic cancer cells [274]. As a consequence, cell proliferation and migration were significantly inhibited by the activation of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [274]. These results support further investigation in the use of polymer-based miRNA delivery systems. However, despite their ability to achieve efficient transfection and tumor specificity [275], their application in clinical is still limited by their high toxicity [265]. This could be because the positive charge of polymers could enhance cellular uptake, but it also destabilizes negatively charged cell membranes [276]. One solution to ease this toxicity is to shield the positive charges through acetylation [277], hydroxylation [278], or modify their surfaces with PEG moieties [279].
3.2.2. Inorganic nanoparticles
Gold nanoparticles are often functionalized with thiol or amine groups on their surfaces, enabling them to effectively bind to miRNAs and load them onto the NPs [66]. Additionally, ligands or antibodies specific to receptors on the surface of target cells can be attached to the AuNPs' surface to increase their stability and targeting ability [280]. Subsequently, the AuNPs can be up taken through endocytosis and intracellular delivery [281] and then release the miRNA cargo due to changes in pH or cellular processes that break down the surface linkages of the NPs [269]. Ultimately, the delivered miRNAs can exert their regulatory function inside the target cells, effectively modulating gene expression required for cancer treatment. However, these nanoparticles have significant limitations, such as low encapsulation efficiency, poor stability, and slow endosomal escape [281]. To overcome these obstacles, lipid nanocomplexes have been conjugated with a functional group known as PEG [254]. In one study, Ghosh et al. (2013) tested 35 formulations of miRNA-AuNP-S-PEG and identified miRNA-1-AuNP10-S-PEG0.5 as the optimal polyelectrolyte complex due to its greater transduction efficiency, lower toxicity, and higher ability to be taken up by cells through endocytosis [281]. Besides gold nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles have recently been applied as novel miRNAs nanocarriers for cancer therapy [282,283]. Arrizabalaga et al. (2022) have attached miRNA-148b to the surface of magnetic nanoparticles by a Diels-Alder cycloadduct [284]. These nanoparticles were then excited by alternating magnetic field radiofrequency to drive the hysteretic heating [284]. As a result of the altered cell membrane properties and the destruction of Diels-Alder bonds, miR-148b mimic was released into A549 cells [284]. Thanks to these achievements, inorganic nanoparticles are becoming one of the most used types of nanomaterials, namely as miRNAs carriers for cancer cells [262].
3.2.3. Organic nanoparticles
Lipid-based nanoparticles were first prepared in 1961, consisting of three major types of charge-based liposomes: cationic, anionic, or neutral. These nanoparticles can either encapsulate miRNAs within their lipid bilayers [285] or form complexes with cationic polyplexes through electrostatic interactions to transport miRNAs to recipient cells [66,261]. In some cases, the surface of lipid-based nanocarriers can be modified with polymers, ligands, surfactants, and fatty acids [286] to control the component release, enhance penetration efficiency, and target medication delivery [287]. Similar to inorganic nanoparticles, target cells take up these nanoparticles, and endosomes' pH changes then prompt miRNA release into the cytoplasm, enabling their functional activities [269]. Wu et al. (2013) have shown that the delivery of miR-29b by the cationic lipoplex system increased miR-29b expression in NSCLC tumors by approximately 5-fold and significantly inhibited tumor growth by nearly 60% [288]. Additionally, CD59 receptor-targeted delivery of miRNA-1284 and cisplatin-loaded liposomes has been shown to have an enhanced therapeutic effect against cervical cancer cells [289].
These results indicated that nanocarriers are remarkably effective in miRNA delivery to target cells, which leads to improvement in cancer treatment; however, studies elucidating the artificial nanoparticles' safety have not been clarified [290,291]. Generally, viral and non-viral miRNA delivery systems have both advantages and disadvantages [261]. Despite higher transfection efficiency, the viral vector is more toxic and can trigger immunological responses [261]. In contrast, non-viral vectors are safer but have low delivery efficiency [261]. Thus, there is an urgent need to find a novel, more effective, and safe tool in miRNA delivery that could overcome both conventional systems' limitations.
3.2.4. Biological nanoparticles
Biological vesicles have emerged as potential candidates for this purpose. Scientists recently discovered a remarkable function in delivering bioactive materials from donor to recipient cells of nano-sized particles naturally secreted by cells, which are extracellular vesicles (EVs) [292]. Since they are biocompatible with cells, they have been marked as one of the most promising nanoparticles for use in specialized cancer treatment.
Besides the natural presence of miRNA contents in EVs, several strategies have been applied to load and enrich selective miRNAs into EVs, which are incubation, electroporation, and sonication [293,294]. Theoretically, incubation desired miRNAs with EVs under CaCl2-supplemented conditions could promote the interaction between them, enhancing the encapsulation of miRNA into EVs [293,294]. Unfortunately, using this separately did not successfully load miRNAs into EVs [295]. Indeed, Zhang et al. (2017) have applied additional heat shock to the EVs membrane, that result, formed the miRNA-CaCl2 complex, which could be introduced into EVs [293]. Another standard method, electroporation, uses an electrical pulse to create nanometer-scale pores in the membrane, allowing the loading of miRNAs into EVs [295]. However, the leakage of endogenous cargoes through large-size pores, such as miRNA and protein, may impact the therapeutic efficiency of miRNA within EVs [294]. In recent studies, researchers have shown that using sonoporation technology to induce cell membrane permeabilization could increase the absorption of therapeutic agents, including miRNAs [295]. Although these strategies have successfully introduced miRNA into EVs, they still cope with the limitation of low transfection efficiency [293,295]. Therefore, recently launched in the market, the commercial kit Exo-Fect offers a promising technique with greater than 50% transfection efficiency and more than 1000-fold upregulation of the interested miRNA [293,296]. Abreu et al. (2021) pre-treated EVs with Exo-Fect reagent to deliver miRNA-155-5p into cells and found that Exo-Fect could modify EVs membrane properties [296]. As a result, miRNA-155 loaded into EVs easily, and the alteration in the Exo-Fect-loaded EVs membrane enhanced the stability of EVs within the target cells as well as decreased the interaction of those modulated EVs with lysosomes [296].
MiRNA-loaded EVs enter recipient cells through the interaction between ligands on the EV’s surface and receptors on the recipient cell’s membrane [297]. The targeting specificity of EV-based systems could be enhanced by genetic engineering or by fusing their surfaces with ligands or homing peptides [298]. Inside the cell, the delivered miRNAs are released into the cytoplasm, where they bind to target mRNAs, thereby exerting their regulation effects on an intracellular signaling pathway that can affect cellular behaviors and functions. Although delivery systems through EVs have more advantages than viral vectors and artificial nanoparticles in terms of biosafety and targeting ability, long-term and considerable challenges in this system are the significant uptake rate and rapid clearance mediated by the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS) [299]. To address this issue, Belhadj et al. (2020) attempted to achieve MPS escape by fusing the “don’t eat me” CD47 signal and the “eat me” homing signal in the exosomal membrane [300]. As a result, this combined strategy acquired a substantial percentage of 123.53% of cancer cell distribution compared to traditional nanocarriers [300]. Overall, besides using conventional nanomaterials, exosomes or EVs could be applied as biological carriers for precisely delivering miRNAs to NSCLC and suppressing tumorigenesis. Table 2 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of miRNA delivery systems and points to methods that could overcome those obstacles.
Table 2.
Advantages and disadvantages of systems used for miRNA delivery in NSCLC.
| Delivery system | Advantages | Disadvantages | Solutions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viral vectors | Long-term gene expression; high delivery efficiency | Low loading capacity, high toxicity, strong immunogenicity | Use of oncolytic adenovirus with tumor-restricted replication abilities | [259,301,302] |
| Non-viral delivery systems | ||||
| Polymer nanoparticles | Non-immunogenic response, high encapsulation capacity | High toxicity in vivo | Acetylation, hydroxylation, or modification their surfaces with PEG | [[277], [278], [279]] |
| Gold nanoparticle | Straightforward functionalization, low cytotoxicity | Low encapsulation efficiency, slow endosomal escape; lack of information about uptake, biocompatibility, and cytotoxicity | Conjugation with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) group | [254,262,281] |
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | Low toxicity, biodegradability, low cost, ease of surface modification | Information about in vivo distribution, uptake ability, and biocompatibility have not been clarified | Functionalization with polyethyleneimine group | [262,303,304] |
| Lipid-based nanoparticle | Non-pathogenic and non-immunogenic response; low toxicity, biodegradable | Short half-lives in sera; low delivery efficiency; moderate loading capacity | Conjugation of the lipids with hydrophilic and flexible polyethylene glycol (PEG) group | [254,261,305,306] |
| Extracellular vesicles | Low cytotoxicity and negligible antigenicity; inner cargos protection, specific targeting | Low uptake rate and rapid clearance mediated by the mononuclear phagocytic system; low transfection efficiency | Fusion with the “don’t eat me” CD47 signal and the “eat me” homing signal in membrane; use of commercial kit Exo-Fect | [254,292,296,299,300] |
Over the last five years, more than two hundred research on miRNAs that successfully suppress NSCLC has been published. These miRNAs have various effects on cancer processes, such as inhibiting proliferation, metastasis, triggering apoptosis, as well as enhancing chemoradiotherapy sensitivity. Thanks to these remarkable research achievements, by 2021, 10 miRNA-based drugs have reached clinical trials, including TargomiRs from EnGeneIC as second or third Line Treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT number: 02369198) [307]. Unfortunately, none of them have entered phase III and a half were halted due to immune-related severe side effects and barriers to drug delivery efficiency, off-target phenomenon [307]. A single miRNA can bind to and target several different mRNAs, making them a double-edged sword when used for multifactorial diseases such as cancer. Moreover, regardless of the achievements of nanomaterial-based platforms for miRNA delivery, perfect tumor targeting has not been achieved since partial nanoparticles still accumulate in the liver and spleen after intravenous administration [307]. Additionally, controlling and validating the distribution and fate-related parameters of nanoparticles certainly contributes to the slow rates in clinical translation [307].
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, the association between miRNAs and NSCLC, various miRNA-based approaches, and cell-specific delivery systems have been discussed. These provide an overview of NSCLC-regulated miRNAs and their target genes in the downstream signaling pathways for the further potential of miRNA-based anti-tumor therapy. MiRNAs have been detected to regulate genes involved in signaling pathways associated with NSCLC, such as PI3K, RTK/RAS, WNT, RB, p53, TGF-β, and NF-κB. Consequences of these are the inhibition of cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in addition to the promotion of cell apoptosis. Furthermore, despite many techniques developed as miRNA carriers, including viral vectors, nanoparticles, and extracellular vesicles, this field requires more investigation to bring miRNA to the target tumors. Although facing many difficulties, we expect that further studies, both in vivo and in vitro, could make breakthroughs to bring miRNAs and miRNA carriers into clinical NSCLC treatment and bring hope to patients and researchers.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data availability statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Contributor Information
Uyen Thi Trang Than, Email: v.uyenttt@vinmec.com.
Thanh-Hong Nguyen, Email: v.thanhnh16@vinmec.com.
Abbreviations
- AKT
ak strain transforming
- ALCAM
activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule
- AVVs
adeno-associated viruses
- BCl
B-cell lymphoma
- BCl-xL
B-cell lymphoma extra-large
- CCNB
cyclin B
- CCND
cyclin D
- CDK
cyclin-dependent kinase
- CHUK
conserved helix-loop-helix ubiquitous kinase
- E2F3
E2F transcription factor
- EGFR
epidermal growth factor receptor
- EMT
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- EV
extracellular vesicle
- ERK
extracellular signal-regulated kinase
- HMG
high mobility group box
- HOX
homeobox
- ID
inhibitor of DNA binding
- JAK
janus kinase
- LPs
lipoplexes
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MAP3K
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase
- miRNA
microRNA
- MDM
murine double minute
- MMP
matrix metalloproteinases
- mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
- MPS
mononuclear phagocytic system
- NF-κB
nuclear factor-kappa B
- NSCLC
non-small cell lung cancer
- NP
nanoparticles
- PEG
polyethylene glycol
- PEI
polyethyleneimine
- PLGA
poly lactic-co-glycolic acid
- PI3K
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- PTEN
phosphatase and tensin homolog
- RAB
RAS-associated binding
- RAC
RAS-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate
- RAF
rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma
- RAS
rat sarcoma virus
- RB
retinoblastoma
- Rho
rhodopsin
- RP
ribosomal protein
- RTK
receptor tyrosine kinase
- SMAD
suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic
- STAT
signal transducer and activator of transcription
- TGF-β
transforming growth factor β
- TGF-βR
transforming growth factor β receptor
- TIMP
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases
- USP
ubiquitin specific peptidase
- UTR
untranslated region
- WNT
wingless/Integrated
References
- 1.Organisation W.H. Lung cancer. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lung-cancer
- 2.Chen R., et al. Emerging therapeutic agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020;13:1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00881-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sung H., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bade B.C., Cruz C.S.D. Lung cancer 2020: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin. Chest Med. 2020;41:1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2019.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Alencar V.T.L., Formiga M.N., de Lima V.C.C. Inherited lung cancer: a review. Ecancermed. Sci. 2020:14. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kanwal M., Ding X.J., Cao Y. Familial risk for lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017;13:535–542. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee E.Y., Muller W.J. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2010;2:a003236. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kontomanolis E.N., et al. Role of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes in carcinogenesis: a review. Anticancer Res. 2020;40:6009–6015. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hnisz D., et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science. 2016;351:1454–1458. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iksen S., Pothongsrisit, Pongrakhananon V. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in lung cancer: an update regarding potential drugs and natural products. Molecules. 2021;26:4100. doi: 10.3390/molecules26134100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sarris E.G., Saif M.W., Syrigos K.N. The biological role of PI3K pathway in lung cancer. Pharmaceuticals. 2012;5:1236–1264. doi: 10.3390/ph5111236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sanaei M.-J., et al. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in lung cancer; oncogenic alterations, therapeutic opportunities, challenges, and a glance at the application of nanoparticles. Transl. Oncol. 2022;18:101364. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Regad T. Targeting RTK signaling pathways in cancer. Cancers. 2015;7:1758–1784. doi: 10.3390/cancers7030860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Butti R., et al. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in breast cancer: signaling, therapeutic implications and challenges. Mol. Cancer. 2018;17:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0797-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu W., Wang H., Zhu D. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in lung cancer. Med Drug Discov. 2022;13:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.medidd.2021.100113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhong Z., Virshup D.M. Wnt signaling and drug resistance in cancer. Mol. Pharmacol. 2020;97:72–89. doi: 10.1124/mol.119.117978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Teo J.-L., Kahn M. The Wnt signaling pathway in cellular proliferation and differentiation: a tale of two coactivators. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010;62:1149–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Komiya Y., Habas R. Wnt signal transduction pathways. Organogenesis. 2008;4:68–75. doi: 10.4161/org.4.2.5851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu J., et al. Wnt/β-catenin signalling: function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2022;7:3. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00762-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.MacDonald B.T., Tamai K., He X. Wnt/β-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev. Cell. 2009;17:9–26. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stewart D.J. Wnt signaling pathway in non–small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014;106 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt356. djt356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Knudsen E.S., Wang J.Y. Targeting the RB-pathway in cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;16:1094–1099. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang C., et al. Gain-of-function mutant p53 in cancer progression and therapy. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;12:674–687. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjaa040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vazquez A., et al. The genetics of the p53 pathway, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008;7:979–987. doi: 10.1038/nrd2656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saito A., Horie M., Nagase T. TGF-β signaling in lung health and disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2460. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morikawa M., Derynck R., Miyazono K. TGF-β and the TGF-β family: context-dependent roles in cell and tissue physiology. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2016;8 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021873. a021873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Derynck R., Budi E.H. Specificity, versatility, and control of TGF-β family signaling. Sci. Signal. 2019;12 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aav5183. eaav5183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tzavlaki K., Moustakas A. TGF-Β signaling. Biomolecules. 2020;10:487. doi: 10.3390/biom10030487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu F., et al. NF-κB directly regulates Fas transcription to modulate Fas-mediated apoptosis and tumor suppression. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:25530–25540. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.356279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jiao L., et al. Nuclear factor-kappa B activation inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells. Vascular. 2018;26:634–640. doi: 10.1177/1708538118787125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xia L., et al. Role of the NFκB-signaling pathway in cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2018:2063–2073. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S161109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mithoowani H., Febbraro M. Non-small-cell lung cancer in 2022: a review for general practitioners in oncology. Curr. Oncol. 2022;29:1828–1839. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zappa C., Mousa S.A. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5:288. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guo Q., et al. Current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:945102. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Postmus P., et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:iv1–iv21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zugazagoitia J., Paz-Ares L. Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: first-line and second-line treatment options. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:671–680. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kelsey C.R., et al. Local recurrence after surgery for early stage lung cancer: an 11-year experience with 975 patients. Cancer. 2009;115:5218–5227. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Uramoto H., Tanaka F. Recurrence after surgery in patients with NSCLC. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2014;3:242. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2013.12.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Altun I., Sonkaya A. The most common side effects experienced by patients were receiving first cycle of chemotherapy. Iran J. Publ. Health. 2018;47:1218–1219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li L.-J., et al. Different treatment efficacies and side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. J. Thorac. Dis. 2020;12:3785. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zubair H.M., et al. Patient perspectives and side-effects experience on chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a qualitative study. Cancer Manag. Res. 2023:449–460. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S396751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sosa Iglesias V., et al. Drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer: a potential for NOTCH targeting? Front. Oncol. 2018;8:267. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tsubata Y., Tanino R., Isobe T. Current therapeutic strategies and prospects for EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer based on the mechanisms underlying drug resistance. Cells. 2021;10:3192. doi: 10.3390/cells10113192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhao Y., Wang H., He C. Drug resistance of targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer harbored EGFR mutation: from mechanism analysis to clinical strategy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2021:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03828-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang D.D., et al. Personalized prediction of EGFR mutation-induced drug resistance in lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2855. doi: 10.1038/srep02855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Meijer J.-J., et al. Small cell lung cancer: novel treatments beyond immunotherapy. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.05.004. Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Peng L., et al. Novel immunotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of lung cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2022;34:89–94. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang C., et al. Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019;12:1–24. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0731-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li Y., et al. MicroRNA-34a/EGFR axis plays pivotal roles in lung tumorigenesis. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e372. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lee H.T., Lee S.H., Heo Y.-S. Molecular interactions of antibody drugs targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in immuno-oncology. Molecules. 2019;24:1190. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bulcha J.T., et al. Viral vector platforms within the gene therapy landscape. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2021;6:53. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00487-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Belete T.M. The current status of gene therapy for the treatment of cancer. Biologics. 2021:67–77. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S302095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Servick K. Gene therapy clinical trial halted as cancer risk surfaces. Science. 2021 doi: 10.1126/science.abl8782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Charbe N.B., et al. Small interfering RNA for cancer treatment: overcoming hurdles in delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2020;10:2075–2109. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cuciniello R., Filosa S., Crispi S. Novel approaches in cancer treatment: preclinical and clinical development of small non-coding RNA therapeutics. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;40:1–19. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02193-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liang L., He X. A narrative review of microRNA therapeutics: understanding the future of microRNA research. Precis. Cancer Med. 2021;4:33. doi: 10.21037/pcm-21-28. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ma H.-P., et al. miRNA-223 is an anticancer gene in human non-small cell lung cancer through the PI3K/AKT pathway by targeting EGFR. Oncol. Rep. 2019;41:1549–1559. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.6983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.He W., et al. MiRNAs in cancer therapy: focusing on their bi-directional roles. ExRNA. 2019;1:1–6. doi: 10.1186/s41544-019-0005-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chakraborty C., et al. Therapeutic advances of miRNAs: a preclinical and clinical update. J. Adv. Res. 2021;28:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.O'Brien J., et al. Overview of microRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018;9:402. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Reda El Sayed S., et al. MicroRNA therapeutics in cancer: current advances and challenges. Cancers. 2021;13:2680. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wu K.-L., et al. The roles of MicroRNA in lung cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1611. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhu X., et al. Frontiers of MicroRNA signature in non-small cell lung cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:643942. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.643942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Petrek H., Yu A.M. MicroRNAs in non-small cell lung cancer: gene regulation, impact on cancer cellular processes, and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2019;7 doi: 10.1002/prp2.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ledford H. Gene therapy’s comeback: how scientists are trying to make it safer. Nature. 2022;606:443–444. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01518-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lee S.W.L., et al. MicroRNA delivery through nanoparticles. J. Control. Release. 2019;313:80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Martino E., et al. MicroRNA-nanoparticles against cancer: opportunities and challenges for personalized medicine. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2023;32:371. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bravo-Vázquez L.A., et al. Applications of nanotechnologies for miRNA-based cancer therapeutics: current advances and future perspectives. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023:11. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1208547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Daige C.L., et al. Systemic delivery of a miR34a mimic as a potential therapeutic for liver cancer. Mol. Cancer Therapeut. 2014;13:2352–2360. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kalfert D., et al. Multifunctional roles of miR-34a in cancer: a review with the emphasis on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and thyroid cancer with clinical implications. Diagnostics. 2020;10:563. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xu Y., et al. miR-34a inhibits melanoma growth by targeting ZEB1. Aging. 2021;13:15538. doi: 10.18632/aging.203114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 72.Reid G., et al. Clinical development of TargomiRs, a miRNA mimic-based treatment for patients with recurrent thoracic cancer. Epigenomics. 2016;8:1079–1085. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fu Z., et al. MicroRNA as an important target for anticancer drug development. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:736323. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.736323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yang J., et al. Targeting PI3K in cancer: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Mol. Cancer. 2019;18:1–28. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0954-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hennessy B.T., et al. Exploiting the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005;4:988–1004. doi: 10.1038/nrd1902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.He Y., et al. Targeting PI3K/Akt signal transduction for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2021;6:425. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00828-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Song L., et al. MicroRNA-126 targeting PIK3R2 inhibits NSCLC A549 cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by regulation of PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway. Clin. Lung Cancer. 2016;17:e65–e75. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nie H., et al. Use of lung-specific exosomes for miRNA-126 delivery in non-small cell lung cancer. Nanoscale. 2020;12:877–887. doi: 10.1039/c9nr09011h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li B., et al. Over-regulation of microRNA-133b inhibits cell proliferation of cisplatin-induced non-small cell lung cancer cells through PI3K/Akt and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway by targeting EGFR. Oncol. Rep. 2018;39:1227–1234. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Li B., et al. MicroRNA-145 inhibits migration and induces apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer cells through regulation of the EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:2944–2954. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zou Z., et al. mTOR signaling pathway and mTOR inhibitors in cancer: progress and challenges. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13578-020-00396-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yin H., et al. MiR-99a enhances the radiation sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting mTOR. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018;46:471–481. doi: 10.1159/000488615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Li Z., et al. miR-101-3p sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to irradiation. Open Med. 2020;15:413–423. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lv X., et al. MicroRNA-520a-3p inhibits cell growth and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018:22. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201804_14822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zhou F., et al. MicroRNA-379 acts as a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting the IGF-1R-mediated AKT and ERK pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2017;38:1857–1866. doi: 10.3892/or.2022.8339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lin F., Li R. MiR-1226, mediated by ASCL1, suppresses the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting FGF2. Bull. Cancer. 2022;109:424–435. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wang J., Shu H., Guo S. MiR-646 suppresses proliferation and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer by repressing FGF2 and CCND2. Cancer Med. 2020;9:4360–4370. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Huang X., et al. MicroRNA-497-5p inhibits proliferation and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer by regulating FGF2. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:3425–3431. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tan T., et al. MiRNA-200a-3p suppresses the proliferation, migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer through targeting IRS2. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020:24. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202001_20050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gao J., et al. microRNA-448 inhibits the progression of non-small–cell lung cancer through regulating IRS2. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019;120:13453–13463. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhao W., et al. MiR-320a-3p/ELF3 axis regulates cell metastasis and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer via PI3K/Akt pathway. Gene. 2018;670:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.05.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Zhang J., et al. miR-802 inhibits the aggressive behaviors of non-small cell lung cancer cells by directly targeting FGFR1 Int. J. Oncol. 2019;54:2211–2221. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2022.5389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang L., Chen R., Zhang Y. miR-296-3p targets APEX1 to suppress cell migration and invasion of non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2019;18:2612–2618. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Deng H., et al. miR-539 enhances chemosensitivity to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting DCLK1. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;106:1072–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kang X., et al. microRNA-612 suppresses the malignant development of non-small-cell lung cancer by directly targeting bromodomain-containing protein 4. OncoTargets Ther. 2019;12:4167. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S204004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 96.Yang P., et al. miR-140-5p regulates cell migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells through targeting VEGFA. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:2866–2872. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Song L., et al. MicroRNA-1179 suppresses cell growth and invasion by targeting sperm-associated antigen 5-mediated Akt signaling in human non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;504:164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Song Q., et al. miR-409 inhibits human non-small-cell lung cancer progression by directly targeting SPIN1. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2018;13:154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Othman N., Nagoor N.H. miR-608 regulates apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma via regulation of AKT2. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;51:1757–1764. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhao X., et al. MicroRNA-124 suppresses proliferation and glycolysis in non–small cell lung cancer cells by targeting AKT–GLUT1/HKII. Tumour Biol. 2017;39 doi: 10.1177/1010428317706215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Liao Z., et al. MicroRNA-561 affects proliferation and cell cycle transition through PTEN/AKT signaling pathway by targeting P-REX2a in NSCLC. Oncol. Res. 2020;28:147. doi: 10.3727/096504019X15732109856009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ding L., et al. MicroRNA-486-5p suppresses lung cancer via downregulating mTOR signaling in vitro and in vivo. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:655236. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.655236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mendonça D.B., et al. MicroRNA-1911-3p targets mEAK-7 to suppress mTOR signaling in human lung cancer cells. Heliyon. 2020:6. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tong L., et al. MicroRNA-365 inhibits the progression of lung adenocarcinoma through targeting ETS1 and inactivating AKT/mTOR pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020:24. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202005_21172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Wei F., et al. miR-593 inhibits proliferation and invasion and promotes apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting SLUG-associated signaling pathways. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;20:5172–5182. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 106.Zhang X., et al. MiR-101-3p inhibits the growth and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer through blocking PI3K/AKT signal pathway by targeting MALAT-1. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;93:1065–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gao L.-M., et al. Tumor-suppressive effects of microRNA-181d-5p on non-small-cell lung cancer through the CDKN3-mediated Akt signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2019;316:L918–L933. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00334.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Xue X., et al. miR-342-3p suppresses cell proliferation and migration by targeting AGR2 in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018;412:170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Song K., et al. Members of the miR-30 family inhibit the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of non-small-cell lung cancer cells by suppressing XB130 expression levels. Oncol. Lett. 2020;20:1. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wang Q., et al. XB130, regulated by miR-203, miR-219, and miR-4782-3p, mediates the proliferation and metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2020;59:557–568. doi: 10.1002/mc.23180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Han J., et al. MicroRNA-20a-5p suppresses tumor angiogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer through RRM2-mediated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2021;476:689–698. doi: 10.1007/s11010-020-03936-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Wang S., et al. miR-874 directly targets AQP3 to inhibit cell proliferation, mobility and EMT in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:1550–1558. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Liu H.-Y., et al. MicroRNA-448/EPHA7 axis regulates cell proliferation, invasion and migration via regulation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020:24. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202006_21509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ma R., et al. miR-496 suppress tumorigenesis via targeting BDNF-mediated PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;518:273–277. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Li F., Wang X., Yang L. MicroRNA-147 targets BDNF to inhibit cell proliferation, migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2020;20:1931–1937. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Dong Y.-Z., Hu T. Effects of miR-143 overexpression on proliferation, apoptosis, EGFR and downstream signaling pathways in PC9/GR cell line. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018:22. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201803_14584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Liu P.-L., et al. MicroRNA-200c inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and migration of lung cancer by targeting HMGB1. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Sun J., et al. MiR-495 suppresses cell proliferation by directly targeting HMGA2 in lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;19:1463–1470. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Guo N., et al. MicroRNA-133a downregulated EGFR expression in human non-small cell lung cancer cells via AKT/ERK signaling. Oncol. Lett. 2018;16:6045–6050. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Wang P., et al. MicroRNA-107-5p suppresses non-small cell lung cancer by directly targeting oncogene epidermal growth factor receptor. Oncotarget. 2017;8:57012. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jamal J., Molaee N., Karami H. Up-regulation of MiRNA-125a-5p inhibits cell proliferation and increases EGFR-TKI induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019;(20):3361. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Sanchez-Vega F., et al. Oncogenic signaling pathways in the cancer genome atlas. Cell. 2018;173:321–337. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.035. e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Heppner D.E., Eck M.J. A structural perspective on targeting the RTK/Ras/MAP kinase pathway in cancer. Protein Sci. 2021;30:1535–1553. doi: 10.1002/pro.4125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lemmon M.A., Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2010;141:1117–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Imperial R., et al. Comprehensive pancancer genomic analysis reveals (RTK)-RAS-RAF-MEK as a key dysregulated pathway in cancer: its clinical implications. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.016. Elsevier. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Pudewell S., et al. Accessory proteins of the RAS-MAPK pathway: moving from the side line to the front line. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:696. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02149-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Zhao Z., et al. miR-202 functions as a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting STAT3. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:2281–2289. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Liu S., et al. MicroRNA-454 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cells growth and metastasis via targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription-3. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:3979–3986. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Liang L., et al. Promoter methylation-regulated miR-148a-3p inhibits lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) progression by targeting MAP3K9. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2022;43:2946–2955. doi: 10.1038/s41401-022-00893-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Jiang W., et al. Micro RNA-1258 suppresses tumour progression via GRB 2/Ras/Erk pathway in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cell Prolif. 2018;51 doi: 10.1111/cpr.12502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Wei X., et al. miR-107 inhibited malignant biological behavior of non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating the STK33/ERK signaling pathway in vivo and vitro. J. Thorac. Dis. 2020;12:1540. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Sun J., et al. MicroRNA-4465 suppresses tumor proliferation and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by directly targeting the oncogene EZH2. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;96:1358–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Tian W., et al. Exosomal miR-338-3p suppresses non-small-cell lung cancer cells metastasis by inhibiting CHL1 through the MAPK signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:1030. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04314-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Liu J., et al. Tumor cell-derived exosomal miR-770 inhibits M2 macrophage polarization via targeting MAP3K1 to inhibit the invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:679658. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.679658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wang L., Zhang M. miR-582-5p is a potential prognostic marker in human non-small cell lung cancer and functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting MAP3K2. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018:22. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201811_16397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Li Y., et al. MiR-199a-5p suppresses non-small cell lung cancer via targeting MAP3K11. J. Cancer. 2019;10:2472. doi: 10.7150/jca.29426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Zhou Y.-L., Xu Y.-J., Qiao C.-W. MiR-34c-3p suppresses the proliferation and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by inhibiting PAC1/MAPK pathway. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:6312. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Zhang J., et al. MiR-27b suppresses epithelial–mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance in lung cancer by targeting snail1. Life Sci. 2020;254:117238. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Li Z.Y., et al. MicroRNA-4500 suppresses tumor progression in non-small cell lung cancer by regulating STAT3. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;20:4973–4983. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 140.Liu W., et al. MicroRNA-4458 regulates PD-L1 expression to enhance anti-tumor immunity in NSCLC via targeting STAT3. Mol. Biotechnol. 2021;63:1268–1279. doi: 10.1007/s12033-021-00379-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Ye Z., et al. miR-138 suppresses the proliferation, metastasis and autophagy of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting Sirt1. Oncol. Rep. 2017;37:3244–3252. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Xu G., et al. MicroRNA-30e-5p suppresses non-small cell lung cancer tumorigenesis by regulating USP22-mediated Sirt1/JAK/STAT3 signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 2018;362:268–278. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Hu C., Zou Y., Jing L.-L. miR-140-3p inhibits progression of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting Janus kinase 1. J. Biosci. 2020;45:48. doi: 10.1007/s12038-020-0003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Cai K., et al. MicroRNA-449b-3p inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting IL-6 and through the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020;19:2527–2534. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Mengie Ayele T., et al. Role of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in the tumorigenesis, chemotherapy resistance, and treatment of solid tumors: a systemic review. J. Inflamm. Res. 2022:1349–1364. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S353489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Carpenter R.L., Lo H.W. STAT3 target genes relevant to human cancers. Cancers. 2014;6:897–925. doi: 10.3390/cancers6020897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Sun C.-C., et al. The novel miR-9600 suppresses tumor progression and promotes paclitaxel sensitivity in non–small-cell lung cancer through altering STAT3 expression. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2016:5. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2016.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Pradhan R., et al. MAPK pathway: a potential target for the treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Future Med. Chem. 2019;11:793–795. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2018-0468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Chen K., et al. Emerging strategies to target RAS signaling in human cancer therapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021;14:1–23. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01127-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.D'Angelo A., Zollo M. Unraveling genes and pathways influenced by H-prune PDE overexpression: a model to study cellular motility. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:756–759. doi: 10.4161/cc.3.6.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Gopal Krishnan P.D., et al. Rab GTPases: emerging oncogenes and tumor suppressive regulators for the editing of survival pathways in cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:259. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Tian Y., et al. MiR-135a inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression by suppressing RAB1B expression and the RAS pathway. Aging. 2020;12:14480. doi: 10.18632/aging.103494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Merrill B.J. Wnt pathway regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2012;4:a007971. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Zeng Y.A., Nusse R. Wnt proteins are self-renewal factors for mammary stem cells and promote their long-term expansion in culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:568–577. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Xu Z., et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling promotes self-renewal and inhibits the primed state transition in naive human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016;113:E6382–E6390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613849113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Liu M., et al. MicroRNA-1253 suppresses cell proliferation and invasion of non-small-cell lung carcinoma by targeting WNT5A. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:189. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0218-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Wang B., et al. miR-577 suppresses cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating the WNT2B mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:2753–2761. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Wang Z., et al. miR-512-5p suppresses the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting β-catenin. Oncol. Lett. 2020;19:415–423. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Han W., et al. microRNA-100 functions as a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer via regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and Wnt/β-catenin by targeting HOXA1. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:1679–1688. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Tan X., et al. MicroRNA-625 inhibits the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by directly targeting HOXB5 and deactivating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;44:346–356. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Li X., et al. MicroRNA-331-3p inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting ErbB2 and VAV2 through the Rac1/PAK1/β-catenin axis in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:1883–1896. doi: 10.1111/cas.14014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Zhijun Z., Jingkang H. MicroRNA-520e suppresses non-small-cell lung cancer cell growth by targeting Zbtb7a-mediated Wnt signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;486:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.02.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Tang X., et al. HOXA4-regulated miR-138 suppresses proliferation and gefitinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2019;294:85–93. doi: 10.1007/s00438-018-1489-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Gao X., et al. miR-455-3p serves as prognostic factor and regulates the proliferation and migration of non-small cell lung cancer through targeting HOXB5. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;495:1074–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Lei Z., et al. miR-185 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion through targeting of SOX9 and regulation of Wnt signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:1742–1752. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Wang Y., et al. MiR-376a suppresses the proliferation and invasion of non-small-cell lung cancer by targeting c-Myc. Cell Biol. Int. 2018;42:25–33. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Dai F.-Q., et al. miR-150-5p inhibits non-small-cell lung cancer metastasis and recurrence by targeting HMGA2 and β-catenin signaling. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2019;16:675–685. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Jiang W., et al. MiR-532-3p inhibits metastasis and proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting FOXP3. J. BUON. 2019;24:2287–2293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Xie Y., et al. MicroRNA-520a suppresses pathogenesis and progression of non-small-cell lung cancer through targeting the RRM2/Wnt axis. Anal. Cell Pathol. 2021:2021. doi: 10.1155/2021/9652420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 170.Liu T., et al. Downregulation of DNMT3A by miR-708-5p inhibits lung cancer stem cell–like phenotypes through repressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:1748–1760. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Fan N., et al. MicroRNA-384 represses the growth and invasion of non-small-cell lung cancer by targeting astrocyte elevated gene-1/Wnt signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;95:1331–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Yu F., et al. Tumor suppressive microRNA-124a inhibits stemness and enhances gefitinib sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting ubiquitin-specific protease 14. Cancer Lett. 2018;427:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Yang Y., et al. Downregulation of miR-3127-5p promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition via FZD4 regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2018;57:842–853. doi: 10.1002/mc.22805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Chen H.-Z., Tsai S.-Y., Leone G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit from cell cycle control. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2009;9:785–797. doi: 10.1038/nrc2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Witkiewicz A.K., Knudsen E.S. Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor pathway in breast cancer: prognosis, precision medicine, and therapeutic interventions. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:1–12. doi: 10.1186/bcr3652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Yao Y., Zhou Y., Fu X. miR-671-3p is downregulated in non-small cell lung cancer and inhibits cancer progression by directly targeting CCND2. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;19:2407–2412. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.9858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Feng H., et al. MiR-34b-3p represses cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and cell apoptosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by targeting CDK4. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019;23:5282–5291. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Qin Y., et al. Lower miR-340 expression predicts poor prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer and promotes cell proliferation by targeting CDK4. Gene. 2018;675:278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Feng Z., et al. E2F3 promotes cancer growth and is overexpressed through copy number variation in human melanoma. OncoTargets Ther. 2018:5303–5313. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S174103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Liu N., et al. MicroRNA-433 reduces cell proliferation and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer via directly targeting E2F transcription factor 3. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:1155–1164. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.He X., et al. miR-4317 suppresses non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by targeting fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9) and cyclin D2 (CCND2) J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;37:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0882-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Gao P., et al. miR-3607-3p suppresses non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by targeting TGFBR1 and CCNE2. PLoS Genet. 2018;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 183.Yu D.-J., Li Y.-H., Zhong M. MicroRNA-597 inhibits NSCLC progression through negatively regulating CDK2 expression. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020:24. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202004_21009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Wang S., et al. MicroRNA-718 serves a tumor-suppressive role in non-small cell lung cancer by directly targeting CCNB1. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;45:33–44. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 185.Bao B., Yu X., Zheng W. MiR-139-5p targeting CCNB1 modulates proliferation, migration, invasion and cell cycle in lung adenocarcinoma. Mol. Biotechnol. 2022;64:852–860. doi: 10.1007/s12033-022-00465-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Shi Q., et al. MiR-181a inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation by targeting CDK1. Cancer Biomark. 2017;20:539–546. doi: 10.3233/CBM-170350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Borrero L.J.H., El-Deiry W.S. Tumor suppressor p53: biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Canc. 2021;1876:188556. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Marei H.E., et al. p53 signaling in cancer progression and therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02396-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Gu J., et al. TP53 mutation is associated with a poor clinical outcome for non-small cell lung cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2016;5:705–713. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Collavin L., Lunardi A., Del Sal G. p53-family proteins and their regulators: hubs and spokes in tumor suppression. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:901–911. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Cai Y., et al. miR-1305 inhibits the progression of non-small cell lung cancer by regulating MDM2. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019:9529–9540. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S220568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Park J., et al. MicroRNA-101-3p suppresses cancer cell growth by inhibiting the USP47-induced deubiquitination of RPL11. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:964. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Cho J., et al. USP47 promotes tumorigenesis by negative regulation of p53 through deubiquitinating ribosomal protein S2. Cancers. 2020;12:1137. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Yoshida T., et al. The clinical significance of Cyclin B1 and Wee1 expression innon-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2004;15:252–256. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Lozano G. Restoring p53 in cancer: the promises and the challenges. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;11:615–619. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjz063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Liang Q., Zhang H. MAP17 contributes to non-small cell lung cancer progression via suppressing miR-27a-3p expression and p38 signaling pathway. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2021;22:19–29. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1836948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Akkafa F., et al. miRNA-mediated apoptosis activation through TMEM 48 inhibition in A549 cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Ye D., et al. MiR-138 promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation through the regulation of the p53 signaling. Stem Cell. 2012;30:1645–1654. doi: 10.1002/stem.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Li Z.-H., et al. MicroRNA-506 has a suppressive effect on the tumorigenesis of nonsmall-cell lung cancer by regulating tubby-like protein 3. Bioengineered. 2021;12:10176–10186. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2001216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Chen Y., et al. Effects and mechanism of microRNA-218 against lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021;23:1. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Chen Z., et al. miR-342-3p regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of NSCLC cells by targeting BCL-2. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021;20 doi: 10.1177/15330338211041193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Shahverdi M., et al. Knockdown of myeloid cell leukemia-1 by microRNA-101 increases sensitivity of A549 lung cancer cells to etoposide. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2021;46:298. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.83173.1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Ehrlich M., et al. Oligomeric interactions of TGF-β and BMP receptors. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1885–1896. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Huang T., et al. TGF-β signalling is mediated by two autonomously functioning TβRI: TβRII pairs. EMBO J. 2011;30:1263–1276. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Huang F., Chen Y.-G. Regulation of TGF-β receptor activity. Cell Biosci. 2012;2:1–10. doi: 10.1186/2045-3701-2-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Colak S., Ten Dijke P. Targeting TGF-β signaling in cancer. Trends Cancer. 2017;3:56–71. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Loh C.-Y., et al. The E-cadherin and N-cadherin switch in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition: signaling, therapeutic implications, and challenges. Cells. 2019;8:1118. doi: 10.3390/cells8101118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Ortiz-Cuaran S., et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition promotes immune escape by inducing CD70 in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2022;169:106–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Liao H., et al. miR-454-3p inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and metastasis by targeting TGFB2. Oncol. Rep. 2021;45:1–12. doi: 10.3892/or.2021.8018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Li H., et al. MicroRNA-17-5p inhibits proliferation and triggers apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting transforming growth factor β receptor 2. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;13:2715–2722. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Yang Z., et al. miR-769-5p suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting TGFBR1 in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:113558. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Zeng Z., et al. Distinct expression and prognostic value of members of SMAD family in non-small cell lung cancer. Medicine. 2020:99. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Tang Y.-N., et al. Epigenetic regulation of Smad2 and Smad3 by profilin-2 promotes lung cancer growth and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8230. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Li J., Chen M., Yu B. miR-433 suppresses tumor progression via Smad2 in non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019;215:152591. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.152591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Li W.-Q., et al. Retracted article: MicroRNA-422a functions as a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer through SULF2-mediated TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:1727–1744. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1632135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 216.Han Q., et al. Altered expression of microRNA-365 is related to the occurrence and development of non-small-cell lung cancer by inhibiting TRIM25 expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:22321–22330. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Li H., et al. MicroRNA-17-5p inhibits proliferation and triggers apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting transforming growth factor beta receptor 2. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017;13:2715–2722. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Jiang F., et al. MicroRNA-98-5p inhibits proliferation and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting TGFBR1. Int. J. Oncol. 2019;54:128–138. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Shen Y., Yang Y., Li Y. MiR-133a acts as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer progression by regulating the LASP1 and TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:3473–3481. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Lin J., et al. MicroRNA-155-5p suppresses the migration and invasion of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells by targeting Smad2. Oncol. Lett. 2018;16:2444–2452. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Han L., et al. MiR-101 inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of lung cancer by targeting zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10:1172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Wang J., et al. MicroRNA-199b targets the regulation of ZEB1 expression to inhibit cell proliferation, migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:5007–5014. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Zhang C., et al. MiR-5702 suppresses proliferation and invasion in non-small-cell lung cancer cells via posttranscriptional suppression of ZEB1. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018;32 doi: 10.1002/jbt.22163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Lv H.-L., Li Z.-L., Song Y.-B. MicroRNA-507 represses the malignant behaviors of non-small cell lung cancer via targeting zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 2. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019:23. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201911_19562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Liu T., et al. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Targeted Ther. 2017;2:1–9. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Liao G., et al. Regulation of the NF-κB-inducing kinase by tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3-induced degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:26243–26250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403286200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Taniguchi K., Karin M. NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18:309–324. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Kumar M., et al. NF-κB regulates mesenchymal transition for the induction of non-small cell lung cancer initiating cells. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Grivennikov S.I., Greten F.R., Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–899. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Huber M.A., et al. NF-κB is essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in a model of breast cancer progression. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;114:569–581. doi: 10.1172/JCI21358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Huang R.-s, et al. microRNA-381 suppresses the growth and increases cisplatin sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer cells through inhibition of nuclear factor-κB signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:538–544. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Jiang Z., et al. MiR-148b suppressed non-small cell lung cancer progression via inhibiting ALCAM through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Thorac Cancer. 2020;11:415–425. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Wu D., et al. miR-449a suppresses tumor growth, migration, and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting a HMGB1-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway. Oncol. Res. 2019;27:227. doi: 10.3727/096504018X15213089759999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Liu B., et al. miR-379 inhibits cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting CHUK through the NF-κB pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019;20:1418–1428. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Lv X., et al. MicroRNA-520a-3p suppresses non-small-cell lung carcinoma by inhibition of High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018:22. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201804_14822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Zhang J.-g, et al. MicroRNA-101 exerts tumor-suppressive functions in non-small cell lung cancer through directly targeting enhancer of zeste homolog 2. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011;6:671–678. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318208eb35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Iacona J.R., et al. Transcriptomic studies provide insights into the tumor suppressive role of miR-146a-5p in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. RNA Biol. 2019;16:1721–1732. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1657351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Mehta A.K., et al. Regulation of autophagy, NF-κB signaling, and cell viability by miR-124 in KRAS mutant mesenchymal-like NSCLC cells. Sci. Signal. 2017:10. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aam6291. eaam6291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Naidu S., et al. PDGFR-modulated miR-23b cluster and miR-125a-5p suppress lung tumorigenesis by targeting multiple components of KRAS and NF-kB pathways. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:15441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14843-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Rupaimoole R., et al. MicroRNA therapeutics: principles, expectations, and challenges. Chin. J. Cancer. 2011;30:368. doi: 10.5732/cjc.011.10186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Frydrychowicz M., et al. MicroRNA in lung cancer—a novel potential way for early diagnosis and therapy. J. Appl. Genet. 2023:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s13353-023-00750-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Chandan K., Gupta M., Sarwat M. Role of host and pathogen-derived microRNAs in immune regulation during infectious and inflammatory diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020;10:3081. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Bravo V., et al. Instability of miRNA and cDNAs derivatives in RNA preparations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;353:1052–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Mráz M., et al. MicroRNA isolation and stability in stored RNA samples. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;390:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Zhang S., et al. The risks of miRNA therapeutics: in a drug target perspective. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2021:721–733. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S288859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Chen Y., et al. Bottleneck limitations for microRNA-based therapeutics from bench to the bedside. Pharmazie. 2015;70:147–154. doi: 10.1691/ph.2015.4774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Di Mauro V., Barandalla-Sobrados M., Catalucci D. The noncoding-RNA landscape in cardiovascular health and disease. Noncoding RNA Res. 2018;3:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2018.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Yokoi T., Nakajima M. microRNAs as mediators of drug toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013;53:377–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Takagi S., et al. MicroRNAs regulate human hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, modulating the expression of metabolic enzymes and cell cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:4415–4422. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.085431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Zhou R., O'hara S.P., Chen X.-M. MicroRNA regulation of innate immune responses in epithelial cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2011;8:371–379. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2011.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Chen C.Z., et al. Regulation of immune responses and tolerance: the micro RNA perspective. Immunol. Rev. 2013;253:112–128. doi: 10.1111/imr.12060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Hong D.S., et al. Phase 1 study of MRX34, a liposomal miR-34a mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer. 2020;122:1630–1637. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0802-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Nayerossadat N., Maedeh T., Ali P.A. Viral and nonviral delivery systems for gene delivery. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2012:1. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.98152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Fu Y., Chen J., Huang Z. Recent progress in microRNA-based delivery systems for the treatment of human disease. ExRNA. 2019;1:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s41544-019-0024-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Wu R., et al. Nerve injection of viral vectors efficiently transfers transgenes into motor neurons and delivers RNAi therapy against ALS. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2009;11:1523–1534. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Zhou K., et al. Routes of administration for adeno-associated viruses carrying gene therapies for brain diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022;15:988914. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.988914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Zhang X., et al. Non-coding RNAs and retroviruses. Retrovirology. 2018;15:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12977-018-0403-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Mishima T., et al. Determinants of effective lentivirus-driven microRNA expression in vivo. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33345. doi: 10.1038/srep33345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Bressy C., Benihoud K. Association of oncolytic adenoviruses with chemotherapies: an overview and future directions. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014;90:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Lou W., et al. Oncolytic adenovirus co-expressing miRNA-34a and IL-24 induces superior antitumor activity in experimental tumor model. J. Mol. Med. 2013;91:715–725. doi: 10.1007/s00109-012-0985-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Yang N. An overview of viral and nonviral delivery systems for microRNA. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2015;5:179. doi: 10.4103/2230-973X.167646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Roma-Rodrigues C., et al. Gene therapy in cancer treatment: why go nano? Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:233. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12030233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Conde J., et al. Revisiting 30 years of biofunctionalization and surface chemistry of inorganic nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Front. Chem. 2014;2:48. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Muhammad Q., et al. Modulation of immune responses with nanoparticles and reduction of their immunotoxicity. Biomater. Sci. 2020;8:1490–1501. doi: 10.1039/c9bm01643k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Kapadia C.H., et al. Polymer nanocarriers for MicroRNA delivery. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020;137:48651. doi: 10.1002/app.48651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Moraes F.C., et al. Mirna delivery by nanosystems: state of the art and perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1901. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Ban E., Kwon T.-H., Kim A. Delivery of therapeutic miRNA using polymer-based formulation. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2019;9:1043–1056. doi: 10.1007/s13346-019-00645-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Yan G., et al. Polymer-based nanocarriers for co-delivery and combination of diverse therapies against cancers. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2018;8:85. doi: 10.3390/nano8020085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Parodi A., et al. Enabling cytoplasmic delivery and organelle targeting by surface modification of nanocarriers. Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1923–1940. doi: 10.2217/nnm.15.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Ibrahim A.F., et al. MicroRNA replacement therapy for miR-145 and miR-33a is efficacious in a model of colon carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5214–5224. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Golafzani F.N., et al. Delivery of miRNA-126 through folic acid-targeted biocompatible polymeric nanoparticles for effective lung cancer therapy. J. Bioact. Compat Polym. 2022;37:168–188. doi: 10.1177/08839115221095152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Arora S., et al. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide)-based nanoformulation of miRNA-150: potential implications for pancreatic cancer therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014:2933–2942. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S61949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Cosco D., et al. Delivery of miR-34a by chitosan/PLGA nanoplexes for the anticancer treatment of multiple myeloma. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:17579. doi: 10.1038/srep17579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Duan Y., et al. Chondroitin sulfate-functionalized polyamidoamine-mediated miR-34a delivery for inhibiting the proliferation and migration of pancreatic cancer. RSC Adv. 2016;6:70870–70876. doi: 10.1039/C6RA15716E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Vangala S., Moku G. Polymeric nanoparticles for cancer gene therapy. BJSTR. 2021;(34):26812–26815. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.34.005563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Madaan K., et al. Dendrimers in drug delivery and targeting: drug-dendrimer interactions and toxicity issues. J. Pharm. BioAllied Sci. 2014;6:139. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.130965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Kolhatkar R.B., et al. Surface acetylation of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers decreases cytotoxicity while maintaining membrane permeability. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007;18:2054–2060. doi: 10.1021/bc0603889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Mastorakos P., et al. Hydroxyl PAMAM dendrimer-based gene vectors for transgene delivery to human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Nanoscale. 2015;7:3845–3856. doi: 10.1039/c4nr04284k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Luo D., et al. Poly (ethylene glycol)-conjugated PAMAM dendrimer for biocompatible, high-efficiency DNA delivery. Macromolecules. 2002;35:3456–3462. doi: 10.1021/ma0106346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Sousa D.P., Conde J. Gold nanoconjugates for miRNA modulation in cancer therapy: from miRNA silencing to miRNA mimics. ACS Mater. Au. 2022;2:626–640. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.2c00042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Ghosh R., et al. A gold nanoparticle platform for the delivery of functional microRNAs into cancer cells. Biomaterials. 2013;34:807–816. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Zhang J., Zhang T., Gao J. Biocompatible iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted cancer gene therapy: a review. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:3323. doi: 10.3390/nano12193323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Kara G., et al. miRacle of microRNA-driven cancer nanotherapeutics. Cancers. 2022;14:3818. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Arrizabalaga J.H., et al. Development of magnetic nanoparticles for the intracellular delivery of miR-148b in non-small cell lung cancer. Biomed. Eng. Adv. 2022;3:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.bea.2022.100031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Couvreur P., Barret G. Critical review in therapeutic drug carrier System. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2005;5:1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Mirtaleb M.S., et al. Advances in biological nano-phospholipid vesicles for transdermal delivery: a review on applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021;61:102331. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Honmane S.M., et al. Polydopamine surface-modified nanocarriers for improved anticancer activity: current progress and future prospects. OpenNano. 2022;7:100059. doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2022.100059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Wu Y., et al. Therapeutic delivery of microRNA-29b by cationic lipoplexes for lung cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2013:2. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2013.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Wang L., Liang T.-T. CD59 receptor targeted delivery of miRNA-1284 and cisplatin-loaded liposomes for effective therapeutic efficacy against cervical cancer cells. Amb. Express. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-00990-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Chen J., et al. Production and clinical development of nanoparticles for gene delivery. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2016:3. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2016.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Mendes R., Fernandes A.R., Baptista P.V. Gold nanoparticle approach to the selective delivery of gene silencing in cancer—the case for combined delivery? Genes (Basel) 2017;8:94. doi: 10.3390/genes8030094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Gilligan K.E., Dwyer R.M. Engineering exosomes for cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1122. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Zhang D., et al. Enrichment of selective miRNAs in exosomes and delivery of exosomal miRNAs in vitro and in vivo. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2017;312:L110–L121. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00423.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Foo J.B., et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes and micrornas in cartilage regeneration: biogenesis, efficacy, mirna enrichment and delivery. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021;14:1093. doi: 10.3390/ph14111093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Wang W., et al. Non-viral gene delivery methods. Curr. Pharmaceut. Biotechnol. 2013;14:46–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.de Abreu R.C., et al. Exogenous loading of miRNAs into small extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2021;10 doi: 10.1002/jev2.12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Vu L.T., et al. microRNA exchange via extracellular vesicles in cancer. Cell Prolif. 2020;53 doi: 10.1111/cpr.12877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Liang Y., et al. Engineering exosomes for targeted drug delivery. Theranostics. 2021;11:3183. doi: 10.7150/thno.52570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Andón F.T., et al. Targeting tumor associated macrophages: the new challenge for nanomedicine. Semin. Immunol. 2017;34:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Belhadj Z., et al. A combined “eat me/don’t eat me” strategy based on extracellular vesicles for anticancer nanomedicine. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2020;9:1806444. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1806444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Kaplitt M.G., et al. Long-term gene expression and phenotypic correction using adeno-associated virus vectors in the mammalian brain. Nat. Genet. 1994;8:148–154. doi: 10.1038/ng1094-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Vannucci L., et al. Viral vectors: a look back and ahead on gene transfer technology. New Microbiol. 2013;36:1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.McBain S.C., Yiu H.H., Dobson J. Magnetic nanoparticles for gene and drug delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008;3:169–180. doi: 10.2147/ijn.s1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Jin L., et al. Efficient delivery of therapeutic siRNA by Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles into oral cancer cells. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:615. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11110615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.García-Pinel B., et al. Lipid-based nanoparticles: application and recent advances in cancer treatment. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:638. doi: 10.3390/nano9040638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Silva B.F., et al. PEGylated cationic liposome–DNA complexation in brine is pathway-dependent. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1838:398–412. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Reda El Sayed S., et al. MicroRNA therapeutics in cancer: current advances and challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:2680. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.








