Skip to main content
Case Reports in Otolaryngology logoLink to Case Reports in Otolaryngology
. 2023 Nov 27;2023:5175871. doi: 10.1155/2023/5175871

Abducens Nerve Neuropraxia due to Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis: Case Report and Literature Review

Abdulrahman Alghulikah 1, Sarah Alseneidi 2, Hedayah Alsaady 3, Ahmed Alhussien 4,, Surayie Al-Dousary 4, Saud Alromaih 4, Abdulrahman AlHumaizi 5
PMCID: PMC10696470  PMID: 38058534

Abstract

Background

Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) is a common infection of the paranasal sinuses that can lead to complications such as orbital and intracranial extension. The abducens nerve course is adjacent to the sphenoid sinus. Diplopia is rarely the initial presentation of sphenoid sinus pathology. In this article, we present the case of a middle-aged male who presented with diplopia and abducens nerve palsy secondary to ABRS, and we conducted a literature review in search of similar cases. Case Presentation. A 52-year-old male presented with diplopia secondary to ABRS. Imaging revealed the complete opacification of the bilateral sphenoid and frontal sinuses, with the extension of the inflammatory process to the optic nerve and cavernous sinus. The patient underwent a surgical intervention, which revealed a pyocele collection in the opticocarotid recess inside the sphenoid sinuses. After the surgery, the patient received antibiotics and reported a complete recovery.

Conclusions

Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis can present with atypical symptoms and lead to serious complications, such as abducens nerve palsy. Early diagnosis, appropriate management, and timely referral to a multidisciplinary team are crucial to preventing residual nerve damage and ensuring favorable outcomes.

1. Introduction

Acute viral rhinosinusitis triggers the activation of the immune cascade, which is responsible for common cold symptoms and helps to eradicate viral infection [1]. In chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), the prolonged inflammatory reaction results in damage to the nasal epithelial cells' surfaces, as evidenced by altered protein expression [2]. In acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), these changes in the cell architecture compromise the defense mechanism of the cell, increase susceptibility to infection, and create a favorable environment for bacterial invasion [3].

Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is clinically defined as the presence of any three of these signs and symptoms: purulent discharge, severe headache, fever, the elevation of inflammatory markers such as the C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or double-interval illness [1]. However, a meta-analysis showed that it is difficult to distinguish viral from bacterial acute rhinosinusitis in clinical settings and that the prevalence of ABRS remains poorly defined [4].

The abducens nerve travels within the cavernous sinus, which makes it anatomically adjacent to the sphenoid sinus [5]. Diplopia is rarely the initial presentation of sphenoid sinus pathology. The abducens nerve can be affected by neoplasms, post-radiation changes, invasive fungal sinusitis, allergic fungal sinusitis, or bacterial sinusitis [6]. In this article, we present the case of a middle-aged male who presented with diplopia and abducens nerve palsy secondary to ABRS, and we conducted a literature review in search of similar cases.

2. Case Presentation

2.1. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

A 52-year-old male with a body mass index of 26.5 and a known case of bronchial asthma and CRS presented to the emergency department, complaining of double vision for one day, which improved with the closure of the right eye. He had also been experiencing a severe right frontal headache for three days, nasal discharge, and facial heaviness. He denied having any other visual complaints, a history of allergic symptoms, or nasal obstruction. The patient had two previous functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESSs), with the last having been completed in the tertiary center 18 months before presenting to the emergency department. Prior to his presentation, he had been using Mometasone nasal spray and normal saline nasal rinses for one month.

The ophthalmological examination demonstrated binocular double vision during the straight and right gaze at near distances, with right extraocular muscle limitation of around 20%, indicating a partial right-sided sixth-nerve palsy. Other ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and slit lamp examinations, were unremarkable. Meanwhile, the endonasal scope showed grade 2 polyps on the right side, with purulent discharge from the middle meatus. The left side showed congested mucosa without polyps or purulent discharge. The remainder of the cranial nerve examination was normal. Laboratory tests were unremarkable.

A computed tomography (CT) scan showed the homogenous complete opacification of the bilateral sphenoid and frontal sinuses. Erosion was seen within the anterior part of the right lateral sphenoid sinus wall, which was closely related to the superior orbital fissure. There was no skull base defect or dehiscence (Figure 1). A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed mucosal thickening in all the paranasal sinuses, with increased central T1 signal intensity and decreased signal intensity on FLAIR and T2-weighted images. A focal extension of signal abnormality was noted from the lateral aspect of the right sphenoid sinus, extending along the right superior orbital fissure, which was associated with mild dural thickening and enhancement in the anteromedial aspect of the right middle cranial fossa. The extension of dural thickening and enhancement was also noted along the orbital apex surrounding the optic nerve (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Computed tomography imaging showing diffuse opacification of the sinuses, with no skull base defect.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Coronal (left) and axial (right) T2 magnetic resonance imaging showed an abnormality from the lateral aspect of the right sphenoid sinus extending along the right superior orbital fissure.

2.2. Management and Surgery

The patient was given intravenous dexamethasone, clindamycin, and ceftriaxone for a duration of three days. On the fifth day of presentation, he underwent a revision bilateral endoscopic FESS, which revealed stenotic scarring on both maxillary antrostomies, with thick hydrated mucin and a polypoid fibrotic mucosa in the maxillary sinus, as well as multiple small pyoceles in the maxillary sinuses. Also, in the ethmoid cavity, the mucosa was polypoidal bilaterally and filled with small pyoceles. Then, trans-ethmoidal sphenoidotomy revealed scar tissues sealing over right opticocarotid recess (OCR; Figure 3). It was opened, and the retained pus was suctioned to evacuate the retained collection. Dehiscence over the carotid and optic nerves was also observed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

An intraoperative endoscopic view of adhesion in the right opticocarotid recess (left) and the view after the release of the adhesions and the evacuation of the pus (right).

2.3. Postoperative Management and Outcomes

The patient was discharged on the second day after the surgery, with close follow-up. His diplopia began to improve on the third day and then resolved completely on the eighth day of follow-up. He continued receiving oral antibiotics, a fluticasone-salmeterol inhaler, and oral prednisone at 40 mg for 14 days, as well as normal saline irrigation and mometasone nasal spray postoperatively. On ophthalmological follow-up 2 months after surgery, the patient showed a full range of movement. The endonasal scope revealed healthy-looking mucosa, including OCR. The histopathology study of the surgical specimen demonstrated mucus and inflammatory cells, and a bacterial stain and culture were negative, as was a fungal culture. The patient has been followed up for the next 5 years, with no recurrence.

3. Discussion

The sphenoid sinus is adjacent to critical structures, such as the middle cranial fossa, cavernous sinus, clivus and pons, cribriform plate, and posterior nasal cavity. It is separated from the surrounding structures by a wall barrier that consists of either thick bone, thin bone, or only mucosal membrane [7]. A defect in the sphenoid sinus wall, which can be congenital or acquired, can lead to the extension of diseases to the surrounding cranial nerves and, thus, unfavorable outcomes [8]. In particular, for the sphenoid sinus, the pattern of pneumatization may expand in different directions, with various extensions to adjacent structures, such as the optic nerve, cavernous sinus, the internal carotid artery, the frontal lobe, the ventral surface of the brainstem, cranial nerves III–VI, and the pituitary gland [9]. One study found that the most common type of pneumatization is the lateral wall extension of the sphenoid sinus (29.5%), while the lesser wing type, which includes superior wall, OCR, and tuberculum recesses, was observed in only 7% of cases [10]. Considering this, pneumatization can lead to a direct increase in sphenoid sinus pathology and extension to the surrounding structures. In our case, this presentation occurred following ABRS due to either the direct extension of the inflammatory process from the inflamed sinuses or the dehiscence of the abducens nerve in the OCR.

The course of ABRS is typically benign and self-limiting, and it can be managed with self-care measures such as analgesia, decongestants, and normal saline rinses. Oral antibiotics are recommended if symptoms do not resolve after 10 days or the severity of symptoms increases by the fifth day [1]. Complications are rare and include orbital extension, which is thought to occur either directly through osteitis of the lamina papyracea or in a retrograde venous pathway via thrombophlebitis of the communicating veins [11, 12]. The intracranial complications of ABRS exhibit a similar pathophysiology: the direct extension of osteitis from the frontal sinus, the extension of osteitis through a congenital or trauma-induced defect in the skull base, or retrograde thrombophlebitis of the diploic veins extending to the dura [13]. The presence of complications may encourage surgical intervention, specifically the drainage of the sinuses to relieve pressure, rapidly remove the inflammatory triggers, and isolate the organism and thus allow culture-specific antimicrobial treatment.

If a patient presents with atypical symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis that indicate an extension beyond the sinuses, such as diplopia, stroke, or vision loss, this suggests a more aggressive disease, such as invasive fungal sinusitis. The management of invasive fungal sinusitis requires systemic antifungal treatment, urgent surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue, and the reversal of the patient's immune status [1].

In patients with CRS, synechiae formation can be a sequel to the stripping of the mucosa during FESS. This complication is associated with more severe types of CRS and multiple surgeries. During the healing of the mucosa after surgery, neoosteogenesis, mucoceles, and adhesions may develop [14]. The presence of synechiae, as in our case, can alter sinus drainage, resulting in an encouraging habitat for bacteria and increasing the occurrence and severity of infections [15, 16]. Therefore, in modern FESS, mucosa-preserving surgery is advised to avoid such complications and outcomes [15].

The pathophysiology of the acute exacerbation of CRS (AECRS) is believed to be triggered by a viral infection, most likely a rhinovirus, which, in turn, tends to increase the abundance levels of other microbial pathogens, such as bacteria. This infection activates the host inflammatory pathway and promotes the classical manifestations of AECRS [1]. In addition, the microbiological profile for AECRS is different from that of classical ABRS, and culture-guided therapy is recommended [17]. However, only around 50% of patients suspected of having ABRS yield a positive culture [4]. In our patient, the culture results were negative, which can be explained by the patient receiving antibiotics prior to the surgery. Some studies have identified asthma, CRS without nasal polyposis, sinonasal outcome test scores greater than 24, a history of sinus surgery, a high body mass index, hay fever, and migraine as risk factors for AECRS [18, 19].

The most important prognostic factor for abducens nerve palsy depends on the underlying type of pathology and the extent of the damage to the nerve and blood supply. Destructive lesions involving the sinus wall and blood supply, such as invasive fungal sinusitis and invasive neoplasms, have been associated with poor recovery, while compressive masses without invasion have been associated with optimal recovery within two weeks [6]. For abducens nerve palsy secondary to ABRS, the literature shows partial recovery in only three cases and no resolution in only one case of 24 [6, 20, 21] (Table 1). The average duration of resolution for neuropraxia was 38.3 days (Table 1). Early intervention was found to be the most important factor in a favorable outcome and complete recovery, as delayed, proper intervention was associated with residual nerve damage [39].

Table 1.

Summary of cases of abducent nerve palsy secondary to sinus pathology in the literature.

Study Etiology Presentation Laterality Clinical grading system Management Prognosis Time to resolution
Miller et al. [6] AFRS Diplopia Bilateral Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 2 weeks
AFRS Diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 2 weeks
AFRS Diplopia Left Grade 2 Surgery, steroids, and oral antibiotics Partial recovery 1 month
ABRS Diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery and intravenous antibiotics Partial recovery 34 days

Gupta et al. [22] ABRS Diplopia, headache and fever Left Grade 2 Surgery and intravenous antibiotics Complete recovery 2 days

Kordrostami and Parmar [23] ABRS Diplopia and visual loss Right Grade 4 Surgery and intravenous antibiotics Full improvement of visual acuity with preset of sixth-nerve palsy 2 months

Mograbi and Soudry [24] ABRS Diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery, steroids, and oral antibiotics Complete recovery 1 month
CRS Diplopia Left Grade 2 Surgery and antibiotics Complete recovery 2 weeks

Ada et al. [25] ABRS Diplopia and headache Right Grade 2 Antibiotics and steroids Complete recovery 2 weeks

Lee et al. [20] Chronic invasive fungal sinusitis Diplopia Bilateral Grade 2 Surgery and antifungal treatment Complete recovery 17 months
Sphenoid sinus fibrosis Diplopia Left Grade 2 Surgery and antibiotics No resolution No resolution
Fungal ball Diplopia and headache Left Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 1 month
ABRS Retroorbital pain and progressive diplopia Left Grade 2 Surgery and antibiotics Complete recovery 4 months

Fockaert et al. [26] AFRS Diplopia and retroorbital pain Left Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 1 month

Siu et al. [27] ABRS Diplopia and headache Right Grade 2 Surgery and antibiotics Complete recovery 6 weeks

Safouris et al. [28] ABRS Diplopia and headache Left Grade 2 Antibiotics and steroids Complete recovery 2 weeks

Del Brutto and Caputi [29] ABRS Diplopia and headache Left Grade 2 Antibiotics Complete recovery 3 weeks

Mubaidin and Hairi [7] ABRS Fever, diplopia and headache Bilateral Grade 2 Antibiotics Complete recovery 4 weeks

Harugop et al. [21] Fungal ball Fever, diplopia and headache Left Grade 2 Surgery, intravenous antibiotics, and local anti-fungal treatment Complete recovery 12 weeks
NR Decrease vision, fever and diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery and anti-fungal treatment Partial recovery 12 weeks

Trinidade et al. [30] Fungal ball Diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 3 weeks

Ceylan et al. [31] CRS Diplopia and headache Bilateral Grade 2 Surgery, steroids, and oral antibiotics Complete recovery 6 weeks

Lapusneanu et al. [32] ABRS Diplopia and headache Right Grade 2 Surgery, steroids, and oral antibiotics Complete recovery 1 month

Giordano et al. [33] ABRS Diplopia, ptosis and headache Left Grade 2 Surgery and intravenous antibiotics Complete recovery 4 days

Vazirnezami et al. [34] AFRS Diplopia and headache Right Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 5 weeks

Muneer and Jones [35] Mucocele Diplopia and headache Right Grade 2 Surgery, steroids, and oral antibiotics Complete recovery 2 days
Mucocele Diplopia and periorbital cellulitis Right Grade 2 Surgery and steroids Complete recovery 2 days
Mucocele Diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery Complete recovery 1 day

Geçirilmesi [36] Mucocele Diplopia Right Grade 2 Surgery Partial recovery 6 months

Hill et al. [37] Mucocele Diplopia, headache and blurred vision, Right Grade 4 Surgery and antibiotics The third nerve palsy had resolved. There was no change in his visual acuity however 3 months
Mucocele Ptosis, diplopia and headache Left Grade 2 Surgery Minimal residual third nerve weakness 1 year

AFRS: allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, ABRS: acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. †: clinical grading system is adapted from Al Anazy and Al-Dousary's classification system [38].

4. Conclusion

Acute bacterial rhinosinusitis can present with atypical symptoms and lead to serious complications, such as abducens nerve palsy. Early diagnosis, appropriate management, and timely referral to a multidisciplinary team are crucial in preventing residual nerve damage and ensuring favorable outcomes.

Data Availability

The case report and literature review data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Fokkens W. J., Lund V. J., Hopkins C. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology . 2020;58:1–464. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang D.-Y., Li Y., Yan Y., Li C., Shi L. Upper airway stem cells: understanding the nose and role for future cell therapy. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports . 2015;15:490–499. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0490-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sachse F., Becker K., Von Eiff C., Metze D., Rudack C. Staphylococcus aureus invades the epithelium in nasal polyposis and induces IL 6 in nasal epithelial cells in vitro. Allergy . 2010;65(11):1430–1437. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith S. S., Ference E. H., Evans C. T., Tan B. K., Kern R. C., Chandra R. K. The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta analysis. The Laryngoscope . 2015;125(1):57–69. doi: 10.1002/lary.24709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whan Kim S., Woo Kim D., Gyu Kong I., et al. Isolated sphenoid sinus diseases: report of 76 cases. Acta Oto-Laryngologica . 2008;128(4):455–459. doi: 10.1080/00016480701762466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miller C., Suh J. D., Henriquez O. A., Schlosser R. J., Ramakrishnan V. R., Chiu A. G. Prognosis for sixth nerve palsy arising from paranasal sinus disease. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy . 2013;27(5):432–435. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mubaidin A. F., Hairi M. A. Sixth nerve palsy and sphenoidal sinusitis. Neurosciences . 2000;5(3):174–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mortimore S., Wormald P. J. The Groote Schuur hospital classification of the orbital complications of sinusitis. Journal of Laryngology & Otology . 1997;111(8):719–723. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100138459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang J., Bidari S., Inoue K., Yang H., Rhoton A. Extensions of the sphenoid sinus: a new classification. Neurosurgery . 2010;66(4):797–816. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000367619.24800.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elkammash T. H., Enaba M. M., Awadalla A. M. Variability in sphenoid sinus pneumatization and its impact upon reduction of complications following sellar region surgeries. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine . 2014;45(3):705–714. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chandler J. R., Langenbrunner D. J., Stevens E. R. The pathogenesis of orbital complications in acute sinusitis. The Laryngoscope . 1970;80(9):1414–1428. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197009000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krohel G. B., Krauss H. R., Winnick J. Orbital abscess: presentation, diagnosis, therapy, and sequelae. Ophthalmology . 1982;89(5):492–498. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34763-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kölln K. A., Senior B. A. Diagnosis and management of acute rhinosinusitis. In: Thaler E., Kennedy D. W., editors. Rhinosinusitis: A Guide for Diagnosis and Management . New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2008. pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tajudeen B. A., Kennedy D. W. Thirty years of endoscopic sinus surgery: what have we learned? World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery . 2017;3(2):115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shi L., Feng Y., Cui W., et al. Effect evaluation of repeated debridement after endoscopic sinus surgery. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine . 2015;8(1):928–933. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nilssen E. L. K., Wardrop P., El-Hakim H., White P. S., Gardiner Q., Ogston S. A randomized control trial of post-operative care following endoscopic sinus surgery: debridement versus no debridement. Journal of Laryngology & Otology . 2002;116(2):108–111. doi: 10.1258/0022215021910041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Woźniak A., Nowak K., Wnuk J., et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis: microbiology and treatment of acute exacerbations in patients after endoscopic surgery. Journal of Laryngology & Otology . 2021;135(12):1088–1093. doi: 10.1017/s0022215121002759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuiper J. R., Hirsch A. G., Bandeen Roche K., et al. Prevalence, severity, and risk factors for acute exacerbations of nasal and sinus symptoms by chronic rhinosinusitis status. Allergy . 2018;73(6):1244–1253. doi: 10.1111/all.13409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Phillips K. M., Hoehle L. P., Bergmark R. W., et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis severity is associated with need for asthma-related systemic corticosteroids. Rhinology Journal . 2017;55(3):211–217. doi: 10.4193/rhin17.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee L.-A., Lee T.-J., Huang C.-C. Endoscopic sinus surgery for solitary abducens palsy in patients with isolated sphenoid sinus disease: report of four cases. Chang Gung Medical Journal . 2002;25(10):689–694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harugop A. S., Mudhol R. S., Bellad S. A., Hajare P. S., Kaku D. R., Hiremath B. Isolated abducens nerve palsy secondary to isolated sphenoid sinus disease: case series. An International Journal Clinical Rhinology . 2016;9(3):137–140. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gupta R., Shukla R., Mishra A. Isolated acute sphenoid sinusitis presenting with hemicranial headache and ipsilateral abducens nerve palsy. BMJ Case Reports . 2015;2015 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-209408.bcr2015209408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kordrostami P., Parmar A. Isolated sphenoiditis presenting with abducens nerve palsy. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol . 2014;1:p. 1014. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mograbi A. E., Soudry E. Ocular cranial nerve palsies secondary to sphenoid sinusitis. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery . 2017;3:49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ada M., Kaytaz A., Tuskan K. Isolated sphenoid sinusitis presenting with unilateral VIth nerve palsy. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology . 2004;68:507–510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fockaert N., D’Hooghe L., Casselman J. Sixth cranial nerve palsy in isolated sphenoid sinusitis: a case report. Acta Neurologica Belgica . 2014;114:335–337. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0292-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Siu J., Sharma S., Sowerby L. Unilateral isolated sphenoid sinusitis with contralateral abducens nerve palsy-A rare complication treated in a low-resource setting. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery . 2015;44:1–5. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0053-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Safouris A., Bragin A., Mabiglia C. Teaching neuroimages: isolated sphenoiditis: an uncommon cause of abducens nerve palsy. Neurology . 2013;81:p. e176. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436936.24787.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Del Brutto O. H., Caputi R. Isolated abducens palsy due to acute sphenoid sinusitis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases . 2018;72:6–7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Trinidade A., Shakeel M., Chapman A. Isolated sphenoid aspergilloma: a differential diagnosis for solitary abducens nerve palsy. West Indian Medical Journal . 2009;58:p. 285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ceylan K., Kizilkaya Z., Emir H. An unusual presentation for 6th Nerve Palsy: isolated chronic sphenoid sinusutis and bilateral abducens palsy. The Internet Journal of Otorhinolaryngology . 6 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lapusneanu L., Radulescu M., Ghita F. Sphenoid rhinosinusitis associated with abducens nerve palsy–Case report. Romanian Journal of Rhinology . 2018;8:125–130. doi: 10.2478/rjr-2018-0014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Giordano D., Perano D., Marchi S. Unusual presentation of pediatric acute sphenoid sinusitis. Acta BioMedica . 2014;85:271–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vazirnezami M., Moghaddasi H., Raad N. Unilateral abducens nerve palsy secondary to isolated fungal sphenoidal sinusitis. Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases . 2008;3:43–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Muneer A., Jones N. S. Unilateral abducens nerve palsy: a presenting sign of sphenoid sinus mucocoeles. Journal of Laryngology & Otology . 1997;111:644–646. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100138204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Geçirilmesi G. Review of a series with abducens nerve palsy. Turk Neurosurg . 2008;18:366–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hill C., Kumar G., Virk J. S. Sphenoid mucocele: a rare cause of ocular dysfunction. QJM: International Journal of Medicine . 2014;107:463–464. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hct247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Al Anazy F. H., Al Dousary S. H. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology . Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley Online Library; 2012. Ophthalmic manifestations of paranasal sinus disease: a clinical grading system; pp. 331–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alhussien A., Alghulikah A., Albaharna H. Loss of vision outcome for allergic fungal sinusitis: case report and literature review. Therapeutic Advances in Allergy and Rhinology . 2023;14 doi: 10.1177/27534030231176774.27534030231176776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The case report and literature review data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.


Articles from Case Reports in Otolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES