Skip to main content
MedEdPublish logoLink to MedEdPublish
. 2020 Nov 18;9:258. [Version 1] doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000258.1

Use of Simulation Based Training to Enhance Cardiac Auscultation Proficiency

Matthew Lavoie 1,a, Bernard Roth 1, Jeffrey Kunz 1
PMCID: PMC10697582  PMID: 38058919

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended.

Introduction:

Cardiopulmonary auscultation is an important skill for medical professionals with deficiencies being well documented with broad implications on healthcare. Providing ideal bedside auscultatory teaching presents many difficulties. Simulation has been used as a means to improve cardiac auscultatory training and circumvent some of these limitations.

Methods:

We studied the use of Harvey © simulation in teaching cardiac murmurs and whether there was improvement in short term knowledge, as well as testing long term knowledge retention, as measured through a standardized test. From 2014-2019, 124 medical students in their 2 nd and 3 rd year of school (during the clinical portion of medical school curriculum) rotating through an Internal Medicine rotation completed a 2 hour training course on cardiac auscultation using Harvey © to identify six common cardiac murmurs. The session contained a pretest, didactic session, and posttest.

Results:

124 students participated in the auscultatory training session. Of them, 42 (34%) underwent the session a second time at an average of 1.29 months from their first session. There was statistically significant improvement between tests. Notably, the most often missed murmurs were mitral stenosis and benign (innocent) flow murmur.

Discussion/Conclusions:

As shown in our study, simulation based cardiac auscultatory education is feasible and likely beneficial in medical education as it can be delivered to a large group of trainees and overcomes the challenges of bedside teaching.

Keywords: Auscultation, Simulation, Murmur, Education

Introduction

Being able to hear, interpret, and communicate findings on cardiopulmonary auscultation is an important skill for medical professionals. The stethoscope is a valuable and cost effective tool that can aid in evaluation of valvular heart disease ( Roldan et al., 1996), dyspnea, and congestive heart failure ( Gillespie et al., 1997). Deficiencies in auscultatory skill throughout medical training have been described. This has implications on medical decision making, diagnosis, patient safety, cost effective care, and continuing medical education ( Woywodt et al., 2004, Mangione and Nieman, 1997, Mangione et al., 1993). Historically, cardiac examination skills in medical traniees is poor and proficiency has been found to potentially decline with more years of training past 3 rd year of medical school, with a lack of cardiac skills being documented in medical students as well as clinicans ( Mangione and Nieman, 1997) ( Mangione et al., 1993) ( Peacock et al., 2006) ( Barrett et al., 2004) ( Lam et al., 2005) ( Perlini et al., 2014) ( Vukanovic-Criley et al., 2006, Mangione, 2001, March et al., 2005).

Indeed, there are many contributors to this lack of auscultation proficiency. There has been a decreased incidence of significant valvular pathlogy with contemporary medicine. In addition, congenital anomalies such as VSD are identified much earlier than once before. This leads to a reduced number of patients with cardiac murmurs and decreased educational opportunity to learn important pathology ( Birdane et al., 2012). Finally, providing ideal bedside auscultatory teaching presents many difficulties to include time constraints on students and experts, patient privacy and difficulty in finding a patient with a significant murmur who is agreeable to bedside teaching.. Consequently, simulation has been used as a means to improve cardiac auscultatory training and circumvent some of these limitations.

Many means of auscultory education exist to include audio, web based, ausucltation task trainers, high fidelity mannequins, recording sthetoscopes, auscultation sound playback devices and sthethescopes. Mannequin simulators, such as Harvey, offer a more realistic patient encounter than audio recordings alone ( Ward and Wattier, 2011).

Curricula have been developed to train and help learners retain cardiac auscultation skills. Several studies, including a metanalysis, have shown the benefit of cardiac ausculatory training in learning and retaining ausculatory skills - from medical students to residents ( Perlini et al., 2014) ( Ewy et al., 1987) ( Spatz et al., 2011) ( Fraser et al., 2011, Butter et al., 2010) ( McKinney et al., 2013). Unfortunately, cardiac auscultation training can be highly variable or even not routinely available during medical school training. Appropriate diagnostic auscultation is particularly important in military medical settings where sophisticated medical diagnostic technology may not be available.

We studied the use of Harvey © simulation in teaching cardiac murmurs and whether there were improvements in short and long term knowledge retention, as measured through a standardized test. This study was conducted over the course of 4 years.

Methods

Madigan Army Medical Center is a large regional military medical treatment facility that has had medical students rotating through several specialties for many years. Prior to 2014, no formal cardiac auscultation training existed for students rotating through the required Internal Medicine medical school inpatient and outpatient rotations. Thus, such a curriculum was developed using the Harvey© simulator.

The Harvey© simulator was the earliest high fidelity technology for cardiac auscultation and was developed in 1968 by Dr. Michael Gordon. It is a full torso mannequin fixed in the supine position to a table. Specific pathology can be set by changing controls on the mannequin console. The Harvey simulator works through transmission of infrared signals from a transmitter to a master stethoscope as a learner places the stethoscope on the mannequin’s chest. When the stethoscope is placed on specific areas of the chest preprogrammed sound playback is produced. The Harvey simulator is meant to give the impression of listening to a real patient. For example: murmurs are different when listening in different areas, peripheral pulses can be palpated during auscultation, and jugular vein pulsations can be observed. This simulation technology has been validated in a number of studies ( Ewy et al., 1987) ( Woolliscroft et al., 1987).

From 2014-2019, 124 medical students in their 2 nd and 3 rd year of school (during the clinical portion of medical school curriculum) rotating through an Internal Medicine rotation completed a 2 hour training course on cardiac auscultation using Harvey © to identify six common cardiac murmurs: aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and benign (innocent) flow murmurs. A pretest was first performed in which students were given a standardized clinical vignette, listened to one of six heart murmurs and then were asked to identify the murmur. Next, a formal 2 hour didactic session was held which consisted of a review of the cardiac physical exam including vital signs, observation, palpation, and auscultation. The auscultory education included teaching how to categorize and grade heart murmurs as well as recognize normal and abnormal heart sounds. Each of the previous six murmurs were reviewed. After the didactic session a post test was conducted.

The posttest consisted of the same six murmurs, but tested in a different order and with a different standardized clinical scenario than the pretest. Results were tabulated to show an overall percentage of correctly identified murmurs, as well as per individual murmur. Possible scores ranged from 0 (none correct) to 6 (all correct). Subsequent analysis was performed for each individual murmur. Additionally, 42 students went through a second internal medicine rotation at Madigan Army Medical Center and thus underwent the training a second time. This occurred either 1 or 2 months later for the students. Their pre and post test results were also collected.

The students pre and post test results were recorded and analyzed. The null hypothesis was that the mean test scores of the pretest and posttest would not differ. Test results were compared using simple t tests. Data were analyzed using Microsoft excel software, and a p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. This quality improvement project was reviewed and approved by the Madigan Army Medical Center Human Research Protections Office.

Results

124 students participated in the auscultatory training session. Of them, 42 (34%) underwent the session a second time at an average of 1.29 months from their first session. The average scores of pretest 1, posttest 1, pretest 2, and posttest 2 were 47%, 81%, 65%, and 90 % respectively. Students improved from pretest 1 to posttest 1 (47% to 81%, p<0.001; Figure 1), pretest 2 to posttest 2 (65% to 90%, P<0.001; Figure 2); pretest 1 to pretest 2 (47% to 65%, p<0.001; Figure 3), and posttest 1 to posttest 2 (81% to 90%, p=0.001; Figure 3). Notably, the most often missed murmurs were mitral stenosis and benign (innocent) flow murmur.

Figure 1. Total percentage of questions answered correctly for pre-test 1 and post-test 1.

Pre-test 1/Post-test 1

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Total percentage of questions answered correctly for pre-test 2 and post-test 2.

Pre-test 2/ Post-test 2

Figure 2.

Figure 3. Total percentage of questions answered correctly in all tests.

All Tests

Figure 3.

Discussion

The cardiovascular physical exam is a noninvasive, cost-effective tool useful in the preliminary diagnosis of valvular heart disease that requires further evaluation. Mastering the cardiac physical exam outside of simulation based training would require examining patients with a wide variety of cardiac conditions and encountering these diagnoses on a repetitive basis which is not feasible.

Simulation based medical education can allow repetitive and planned exposure to key ausculatory abnormalities without the constraints previously discussed. Simulation based physical examination training can likely be implemented as a stand alone intervention and does not necessarily have to be integrated into a specific curriculum ( McKinney et al., 2013). Unfortunately, based on a recent survery of UK medical schools, cardiac simulation is not being used as a tool for repetitive practice, but mainly as a means for introduction to heart murmurs. Of note, the impact of such teaching on clinical examination has generally not been measured ( Owen and Wong, 2015).

Studies have used cardiac simulation to teach learners from medical student to attending, with promising results ( McKinney et al., 2013). This type of intervention is feasible for medical school and residency programs as it can be delivered to a large group of trainees and overcomes the challenges of bedside teaching. Presumably, this translates to improvement in cardiac ausculation in actual patients.

One recent analysis of embedded multimedia simulations of heart sounds on the United States Medical Licensing Exam found that medical students appear to have become more adept at interpreting auscultation findings in recent years (2012 compared to 2007). The authors suggested this improvement may be due to technologic advances facilitating reproduction of heart sounds allowing for production of educational cases. Another consideration was that examinees may be receiving more formal training in cardiac auscultation from their medical schools ( Short et al., 2018).

As shown in our study, simulation based cardiac auscultatory education is feasible and likely beneficial in medical education as it can be delivered to a large group of trainees and overcomes the challenges of bedside teaching. This training also has increased potential benefit in military medical trainees that may find themselves in resource limited settings.

Future research could focus on assessing cardiac diagnostic skill in real clinical practice, as compared to cardiac simulation. Additional studies may also explore longitudinal auscultation skills throughout a physician’s career. There are several limitations to this study. Our study lacked a control group that could be compared to the efficacy of simulation based cardiac training. It is also not clear if the observed improvement in murmur identification will translate to actual patients since all testing was done on the simulator. In addition, the study was conducted in one center, with a relatively small sample size, and was limited to available medical trainees at this institution.

Conclusion

As shown in our study, simulation based cardiac auscultatory education is feasible and likely beneficial in medical education as it can be delivered to a large group of trainees and overcomes the challenges of bedside teaching. This training also has increased potential benefit in military or rural medical trainees that may find themselves in resource limited settings.

Take Home Messages

  • Cardiopulmonary auscultation is an important skill for medical professionals and has broad implications on healthcare. Despite this, deficiencies are well documented.

  • Particularly difficult to diagnose murmurs appear to include mitral stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and benign (innocent) flow murmur.

  • Simulation based cardiac auscultatory education is feasible and likely beneficial in medical education as it can be delivered to a large group of trainees and overcomes the challenges of bedside teaching.

Notes On Contributors

Dr. Matthew Lavoie, MD is an internal medicine resident at Madigan Army Medical Center, United States of America.

Dr. Bernard Roth, MD is a board certified pulmonary and critical care physician at Madigan Army Medical Center, United States of America.

Dr. Jeffrey Kunz, MD is a board certified interventional cardiologist at Madigan Army Medical Center, United States of America.

Acknowledgments

Figure 1-3. Source: the author.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army Medical Department, Department of the Army, Department of Defense or the U.S. Government.

[version 1; peer review: This article was migrated, the article was marked as recommended]

Declarations

The author has declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethics Statement

The Madigan Army Medical Center Human Research Protections Office received the project on 22 April 2019 to review for applicability of human subject protections regulations and deemed this project did not require ethics approval.

External Funding

This article has not had any External Funding

Bibliography/References

  1. Barrett M. J., Lacey C. S., Sekara A. E., Linden E. A., et al. (2004) Mastering cardiac murmurs: the power of repetition. Chest. 126(2), pp.470–475. 10.1378/chest.126.2.470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birdane A., Yazici H. U., Aydar Y., Mert K. U., et al. (2012) Effectiveness of cardiac simulator on the acquirement of cardiac auscultatory skills of medical students. Adv Clin Exp Med. 21(6), pp.791–798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butter J., McGaghie W. C., Cohen E. R., Kaye M., et al. (2010) Simulation-based mastery learning improves cardiac auscultation skills in medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 25(8), pp.780–785. 10.1007/s11606-010-1309-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ewy G. A., Felner J. M., Juul D., Mayer J. W., et al. (1987) Test of a cardiology patient simulator with students in fourth-year electives. J Med Educ. 62(9), pp.738–743. 10.1097/00001888-198709000-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser K., Wright B., Girard L., Tworek J., et al. (2011) Simulation training improves diagnostic performance on a real patient with similar clinical findings. Chest. 139(2), pp.376–381. 10.1378/chest.10-1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gillespie N. D., McNeill G., Pringle T., Ogston S., et al. (1997) Cross sectional study of contribution of clinical assessment and simple cardiac investigations to diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients admitted with acute dyspnoea. Bmj. 314(7085), pp.936–940. 10.1136/bmj.314.7085.936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lam M. Z., Lee T. J., Boey P. Y., Ng W. F., et al. (2005) Factors influencing cardiac auscultation proficiency in physician trainees. Singapore Med J. 46(1), pp.11–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mangione S.(2001) Cardiac auscultatory skills of physicians-in-training: a comparison of three English-speaking countries. Am J Med. 110(3), pp.210–216. 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00673-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mangione S. and Nieman L. Z.(1997) Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency. Jama. 278(9), pp.717–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mangione S. Nieman L. Z. Gracely E. and Kaye D.(1993) The teaching and practice of cardiac auscultation during internal medicine and cardiology training. A nationwide survey. Ann Intern Med. 119(1), pp.47–54. 10.7326/0003-4819-119-1-199307010-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. March S. K. Bedynek J. L. Jr. and Chizner M. A.(2005) Teaching cardiac auscultation: effectiveness of a patient-centered teaching conference on improving cardiac auscultatory skills. Mayo Clin Proc. 80(11), pp.1443–1448. 10.4065/80.11.1443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKinney J. Cook D. A. Wood D. and Hatala R.(2013) Simulation-based training for cardiac auscultation skills: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 28(2), pp.283–291. 10.1007/s11606-012-2198-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Owen S. J. and Wong K.(2015) Cardiac auscultation via simulation: a survey of the approach of UK medical schools. BMC Res Notes. 8, pp.427. 10.1186/s13104-015-1419-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peacock W. F. Harrison A. and Moffa D.(2006) Clinical and economic benefits of using AUDICOR S3 detection for diagnosis and treatment of acute decompensated heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 12 Suppl 1, pp.32–36. 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2006.05772.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perlini S. Salinaro F. Santalucia P. and Musca F.(2014) Simulation-guided cardiac auscultation improves medical students’ clinical skills: the Pavia pilot experience. Intern Emerg Med. 9(2), pp.165–172. 10.1007/s11739-012-0811-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roldan C. A. Shively B. K. and Crawford M. H.(1996) Value of the cardiovascular physical examination for detecting valvular heart disease in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol. 77(15), pp.1327–1331. 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00200-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Short K. Bucak S. D. Rosenthal F. and Raymond M. R.(2018) When Listening Is Better Than Reading: Performance Gains on Cardiac Auscultation Test Questions. Acad Med. 93(5), pp.781–785. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spatz E. S. LeFrancois D. and Ostfeld R. J.(2011) Developing cardiac auscultation skills among physician trainees. Int J Cardiol. 152(3), pp.391–392. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vukanovic-Criley J. M., Criley S., Warde C. M., Boker J. R., et al. (2006) Competency in cardiac examination skills in medical students, trainees, physicians, and faculty: a multicenter study. Arch Intern Med. 166(6), pp.610–616. 10.1001/archinte.166.6.610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ward J. J. and Wattier B. A.(2011) Technology for enhancing chest auscultation in clinical simulation. Respir Care. 56(6), pp.834–845. 10.4187/respcare.01072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Woolliscroft J. O. Calhoun J. G. Tenhaken J. D. and Judge R. D.(1987) Harvey: the impact of a cardiovascular teaching simulator on student skill acquisition. Med Teach. 9(1), pp.53–57. 10.3109/01421598709028980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Woywodt A., Herrmann A., Kielstein J. T., Haller H., et al. (2004) A novel multimedia tool to improve bedside teaching of cardiac auscultation. Postgrad Med J. 80(944), pp.355–357. 10.1136/pgmj.2003.014944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Apr 13. doi: 10.21956/mep.20173.r31184

Reviewer response for version 1

Julie Hunt 1

This review has been migrated. The reviewer awarded 4 stars out of 5 This study describes a simulation-based training study with a pre-test/post-test design which repeated 1-2 months later. The study provides evidence that students learned from the intervention, lost some knowledge over the 1-2 month period, but retained some of what they learned. This is promising for Harvey simulator training in cardiac auscultation.What the study does not contain is a validation of the simulator. The authors do not include a reference to suggest whether that has been performed previously, or a statement about whether that should be performed subsequently—but surely one statement or the other is appropriate to include to ensure that the simulator is valid for teaching and assessing the skill. The authors do mention in the discussion that there is a presumption that skills demonstrated on the mannikin translate into skills demonstrated on live patients, and this is a presumption that should be investigated by future research.I would add as a limitation of this research that the study did not gather any student feedback on the simulator, nor any expert opinions of the simulator. This feedback may have offered explanations for why the mitral stenosis and innocent flow murmurs were most challenging to hear, or have generated feedback for improvement of the educational experience.Overall I think this study is a valuable start to investigating Harvey’s use for teaching auscultation. I would like to see additional testing to validate and support the simulator’s use for this purpose.

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

No decision status is available

MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Mar 6. doi: 10.21956/mep.20173.r31183

Reviewer response for version 1

Ken Masters 1

This review has been migrated. The reviewer awarded 4 stars out of 5 An interesting paper dealing with the use of simulation-based training to enhance cardiac auscultation proficiency.The introduction clearly identifies the main problems with teaching the topic: there is a great need for the skills, but finding suitable patients on which to learn and practice is difficult. A simulation device has the potential to help solve the problem. The experimental design follows a standard pre-test, intervention and post-test, and the results are compared. Some small issues:• The results are clearly laid out, although some analysis would have been useful (this may be personal preference).• If there are no copyright or other issues, it would be useful if the contents (or, at least, a detailed course outline) of the intervention could be given. This would assist readers in their implementation of such an intervention – and this would be the real value of the paper: not merely telling people that it CAN be done, but giving them greater insight into HOW it can be done.• The mean percentages should be given with one decimal place.• It would be useful if the Discussion could begin with a brief synopsis of what was performed.Although this is a small and localised study, it is a useful contribution to the value of using simulation-based interventions in medical teaching.

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

No decision status is available

MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Feb 28. doi: 10.21956/mep.20173.r31182

Reviewer response for version 1

Haipeng Xiao 1

This review has been migrated. The reviewer awarded 3 stars out of 5 This is an exploratory study that looked into the effect of simulation training on cardiac auscultatory skills among a convenient sample of second-year and third-year medical students and found that such an educational approach was both practically feasible and potentially beneficial. Besides what was mentioned by the authors in the limitation section, I believe this piece of research could be improved upon in several ways, when resources permit: (1) adding a control arm (as already mentioned in the manuscript); (2) on top of having a control arm, try to use the 4-group design to account for the effect of pre-test; (3) collect quantitative data on course satisfaction as well as qualitative data on learning experiences among students, to further explore the educational impact of this intervention; (4) assess students' performance in real-world clinical practice (for "transfer of learning"). In any case, this work is worth reading for those working in the area of simulation.

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

No decision status is available


Articles from MedEdPublish are provided here courtesy of Association for Medical Education in Europe

RESOURCES