Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Nov 21;17(11):e0011519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011519

The impact of vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health in a mouse model of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection

Duc Minh Nguyen 1, Cristina Poveda 2, Jeroen Pollet 2, Fabian Gusovsky 4, Maria Elena Bottazzi 2,3,5, Peter J Hotez 2,3,5,6,7, Kathryn Marie Jones 2,3,*
Editor: Renata Rosito Tonelli8
PMCID: PMC10697595  PMID: 37988389

Abstract

Background

Chagas disease, chronic infection with Trypanosoma cruzi, mainly manifests as cardiac disease. However, the liver is important for both controlling parasite burdens and metabolizing drugs. Notably, high doses of anti-parasitic drug benznidazole (BNZ) causes liver damage. We previously showed that combining low dose BNZ with a prototype therapeutic vaccine is a dose sparing strategy that effectively reduced T. cruzi induced cardiac damage. However, the impact of this treatment on liver health is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated several markers of liver health after treatment with low dose BNZ plus the vaccine therapy in comparison to a curative dose of BNZ.

Methodology

Female BALB/c mice were infected with a bioluminescent T. cruzi H1 clone for approximately 70 days, then randomly divided into groups of 15 mice each. Mice were treated with a 25mg/kg BNZ, 25μg Tc24-C4 protein/ 5μg E6020-SE (Vaccine), 25mg/kg BNZ followed by vaccine, or 100mg/kg BNZ (curative dose). At study endpoints we evaluated hepatomegaly, parasite burden by quantitative PCR, cellular infiltration by histology, and expression of B-cell translocation gene 2(BTG2) and Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) by RT-PCR. Levels of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were quantified from serum.

Results

Curative BNZ treatment significantly reduced hepatomegaly, liver parasite burdens, and the quantity of cellular infiltrate, but significantly elevated serum levels of ALT, AST, and LDH. Low BNZ plus vaccine did not significantly affect hepatomegaly, parasite burdens or the quantity of cellular infiltrate, but only elevated ALT and AST. Low dose BNZ significantly decreased expression of both BTG2 and PPARα, and curative BNZ reduced expression of BTG2 while low BNZ plus vaccine had no impact.

Conclusions

These data confirm toxicity associated with curative doses of BNZ and suggest that while dose sparing low BNZ plus vaccine treatment does not reduce parasite burdens, it better preserves liver health.

Author summary

Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease caused by the protozoal parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, which has long-term deleterious health effects. The current treatment for Chagas disease is administering the antiparasitic drug, benznidazole. While benznidazole effectively treats the disease during the acute phase, its efficacy is reduced during chronic infection. In addition, benznidazole therapy causes significant side effects, including liver toxicity. Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development at Baylor College of Medicine has developed a treatment strategy that combines a prototype therapeutic vaccine with a lower dose of Benznidazole to promote a protective immune response, ameliorate the deleterious effects of the parasite, and limit the harmful side effect of the drug. We call this vaccine-linked chemotherapy, which has shown promising results regarding heart health by reducing parasite burden and pathology in the heart and improving cardiac function. This study evaluated the strategy’s effectiveness in the liver since it is the prime metabolizer of the benznidazole drug, as well as the organ of parasite clearance. Results from this study demonstrated that vaccine-linked chemotherapy causes less damage to the liver compared to curative doses of benznidazole and may be a desirable treatment strategy to preserve overall health while retaining efficacy.

Introduction

Chagas disease is a bloodborne parasitic protozoal disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, which through human migration, is found in all parts of the world [1]. Considered a neglected tropical disease, it is mainly found in lower socioeconomic areas of Latin America, where an estimated 6–7 million people are affected by this disease [2]. Being a bloodborne infection, the disease can be disseminated through blood transmission, organ transplant, or congenital transmission from mother to fetus [3]. However, the most common path of infections is through contact with the feces of infected Triatomine insect vectors, which are only found in the Americas [4].

Most often, people are not even aware of their infection status. In the initial acute phase of infection, the infected individual may be asymptomatic or experience nonspecific, generalized flu-like symptoms such as fever, fatigue, body aches, vomiting, and diarrhea [1,5]. During this time, high levels of motile trypomastigotes circulate throughout the individual’s bloodstream [6]. Left untreated, the disease progresses to a chronic phase, circulating parasite levels in the blood drop to low levels, and detection can be difficult without sensitive PCR or culture methods [7,8]. There are also long-term deleterious health effects associated with the chronic phase. 30% of people develop cardiac complications, which is the most significant disease manifestation and may include heart enlargement, conduction disturbances, or even cardiac arrest [9,10]. In 10% of people, gastrointestinal complications may occur, causing disorders like megaesophagus or megacolon [11].

Though cardiac disease, and to a lesser extent gastrointestinal disease, have been extensively explored, the impact of T. cruzi on the liver need further elucidation. Studies have shown that the liver is important in clearing parasites from the blood during both the acute and chronic phases of infection [12]. The release of amastigote nest and immediate phagocytosis by resident immune cells produce nitric oxide and oxygen radicals that kill the parasite but can lead to organ damage [13]. Once the disease enters the chronic phase, it is characterized by low parasitemia and low-grade tissue inflammation [7]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can directly stimulate hepatic stellate cells, which are known to produce extracellular matrix proteins that lead to hepatic fibrosis [14]. Over time, ROS and chronic low-grade inflammation lead to fibrosis and organ dysfunction [14].

The current treatment for Chagas disease is administering the antiparasitic drug benznidazole (BNZ) [10]. While BNZ is effective at curing when treatment is initiated during the acute phase, cure rates significantly decline when treatment is initiated during the chronic phase [15]. Importantly, a large multicenter trial treating patients with established cardiac disease showed that treatment did not prevent disease progression or cardiac death [16]. Another important limitation of benznidazole therapy is the toxic profile. The side effects of BNZ include hypersensitivity, neuropathy, and bone marrow disorders, which can result in individuals discontinuing treatment [17]. Benznidazole is metabolized by the cytochrome p450 enzyme, which is found throughout the body but primarily in liver cells [18]. The liver has also been shown to efficiently elicit a robust immune response with superior levels of inflammation and IFN-y production [19]. These elevated levels of inflammation can also damage the liver and may be associated with immune allergic hepatitis [20]. Further, it has been demonstrated in pre-clinical models of acute Chagas disease that the combined effect of both infection and BNZ treatment induce more liver damage than either component alone [21]. Thus, it is critical to evaluate the impact of novel treatments for Chagas disease on the liver to avoid exacerbating damage and diminishing overall health.

To overcome the efficacy and tolerability limitations of standard BNZ treatment, we developed a recombinant protein vaccine, consisting of the T. cruzi flagellar derived Tc24-C4 antigen combined with a TLR4 agonist adjuvant in a stable squalene emulsion [22,23]. In mouse models of acute infection, this vaccine effectively reduces parasite burdens, cardiac inflammation, and cardiac fibrosis when combined with low-dose BNZ treatment in a vaccine-linked chemotherapy strategy [24,25]. Further, vaccine-linked chemotherapy improved cardiac function, and reduced endpoint cardiac inflammation in a mouse model of chronic infection similar to curative doses of BNZ [26]. This multimodal approach reduces the dosing requirements of BNZ while showing the ability to enhance the efficacy of the drug and reduce tissue damage by increasing IFN- γ production. Thus, this dose sparing strategy should reduce the tolerability concerns of standard BNZ treatment. However, the impact of vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health has not been explored. Therefore, we specifically evaluated the effect of both a curative BNZ treatment regimen as well as our vaccine-linked chemotherapy regimen on liver health in a mouse model of chronic T. cruzi infection.

Material and methods

Ethics statement

All animal studies were conducted in strict compliance with the 8th Edition of The Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under assurance number D16-00475.

Mice and parasites

Six- to eight-week-old BALB/c female mice were obtained from Taconic (Rensselaer, NY). Mice were housed in groups of 5 in static caging, with ad-libitum food and water, and kept on a 12:12hr light/dark cycle. The T. cruzi H1 strain, transfected with the pTRIX2-RE9h plasmid containing the thermostable, red-shifted firefly luciferase gene PpyRE9h [2730], was grown on monolayers of the C2C12 mouse myocyte cell line (ATCC CRL-1772) in RPMI media supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 1X Penicillin/Streptomycin (cRPMI) to propagate tissue culture trypomastigotes (TCT). Culture media containing TCT was collected, parasites were pelleted by centrifugation, washed once with sterile medical grade saline, then resuspended in sterile medical grade saline. We elected to use a luciferase expressing clone of the T. cruzi H1 strain for these studies as we have demonstrated that chronic infection with this clone induces significant cardiac pathology in our female BALB/c mouse model, including changes in cardiac structure and function (30), similar to changes induced by chronic infection with the WT T. cruzi H1 strain used in prior studies (26). Use of this clone will allow serial in vivo imaging in future studies to track and quantify tissue parasite levels.

Benznidazole

Benznidazole powder (MedChem Express) was resuspended in 5% DMSO/95% HPMC (0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/ 0.4% Tween 80/ 0.5% benzyl alcohol in deionized water) to a final concentration of 10mg/mL. Mice were administered a 25mg/kg BNZ or 100mg/kg BNZ (Table 1) as described in the study design.

Table 1. Treatments, routes, doses and frequency.

Treatment Dose Route Frequency
Vaccine 25μg Tc24-C4/ 5μg E6020-SE Subcutaneously Twice, two weeks apart
E6020 SE 5μg E6020-SE Subcutaneously Twice, two weeks apart
Low BNZ 25mg/kg Orally Once daily for 18 days
Curative BNZ 100mg/kg Orally Once daily for 18 days

Vaccine formulations

Recombinant Tc24-C4 protein was expressed and purified in-house according to previously published protocols [23]. The TLR4 agonist adjuvant E6020 (Eisai, Inc) was dissolved in a stable squalene emulsion (SE). Vaccine formulations comprised of the selected dose of recombinant Tc24-C4 protein and E6020 in 4% squalene emulsion in PBS 1x pH 7.4 were freshly prepared and mixed (1:1) just before subcutaneous injection. Mice were administered 25μg Tc24-C4/ 5μg E6020-SE or 5μg E6020-SE alone (Table 1) as described in the study design.

Study design

Mice were infected with 5000 trypomastigotes of a bioluminescent clone of the T. cruzi H1 strain, generated in our laboratory [30], by intraperitoneal injection. Naïve age-matched mice were left uninfected as controls. Blood was collected by tail vein microsampling from all mice at approximately 28 days post-infection (DPI) to confirm parasitemia by quantitative PCR. Approximately 70 DPI mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups, with 15 mice per group as described in Table 2. Benznidazole treatments were administered once daily by oral gavage, and vaccinations were administered by subcutaneous injection according to the timeline in Fig 1. Mice were monitored daily for morbidity and any mice that reached humane endpoints were humanely euthanized. Cohorts of mice were euthanized at multiple time points after treatments were completed to evaluate the treatment’s short- and long-term effects on liver health. At the study endpoints, all mice were weighed, then humanely euthanized. Whole blood was collected postmortem. Livers were removed, and weighed, then one section was frozen for DNA and RNA analysis, and a second portion was placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathology analysis.

Table 2. Treatment groups.

Group Infection Treatment #1 Treatment #2 Euthanasia Timepoint
#1 Naïve N/A N/A 142dpi
#2 Infected N/A N/A 90dpi
#3 Infected N/A N/A 120dpi
#4 Infected N/A N/A 142dpi
#5 Infected Low BNZ N/A 120dpi
#6 Infected Vaccine N/A 120dpi
#7 Infected Low BNZ Vaccine 142dpi
#8 Infected E6020 SE N/A 120dpi
#9 Infected High BNZ N/A 142dpi

Fig 1. Treatment timeline.

Fig 1

Image created with Biorender.

QRT-PCR for Parasite Burden

According to the manufacturer’s guidelines, DNA was extracted from frozen liver tissue (20mg) using PDQeX Nucleic Acid Extractor. To measure tissue parasite burden, quantitative real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan Fast Advanced master mix (Life Technologies) and oligonucleotides specific for the satellite region of T. cruzi nuclear DNA (primers 5′-ASTCGGCTGATCGTTTTCGA-3′ and 5′-AATTCCTCCAAGCAGCGGATA-3′ and probe 5′-6-FAM-CACACACTGGACACCAA-MGB-3′. T. cruzi data were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (primers 5’ CAATGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCT 3’ and 5’ GTCCTCAGTGTAGCCCAAGATG 3’, probe 5’ 6-FAM CGTGCCGCCTGGAGAAACCTGCC MGB 3’; Life Technologies, CA, USA) (Life Technologies), and parasite burden was calculated based on the standard curve of known parasite contents [24].

Liver enzyme analysis

Whole blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 30 minutes, then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes at room temperature to separate serum. Serum was analyzed for aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) using a Beckman Coulter AU480 Chemistry Analyzer (Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine).

Histopathology analysis

Sections of the liver were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, sectioned to 5μm thickness, and adhered to glass slides. Sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Images of liver H&E histology slides were taken from 5 randomly selected representative fields at 10x magnification using an Amscope ME580 brightfield microscope. Images’ color thresholds (hue, saturation, brightness) were adjusted using ImageJ to create uniformity among all images. A count of lymphocyte nuclei was accomplished by setting a particle size limit to exclude larger hepatocyte nuclei and smaller debris from being factored into the count. Lymphocyte counts from all 5 randomly selected fields were averaged to indicate inflammatory cell infiltration in the liver.

QRT-PCR for BTG2 and PPARα

According to the manufacturer’s guidelines, RNA was isolated from frozen liver tissue (20mg) using RNeasy kit (Qiagen). The concentration of RNA was quantified using Nanodrop with a target concentration of 100ng/uL. cDNA was amplified with RT-PCR master mix (ThermoFisher) and ran in Bio-Rad PCR Thermal Cycler. QRT-PCR was performed using a Quant Studio 3 thermocycler (Applied Biosciences). The specific primers were as follows: BTG2 (Mm00476162_m1 Primers and Probe Taqman gene Btg2 (FAM-MGB), PPARα (Mm00440939_m1) Primers and Probe Taqman gene Pparα (FAM-MGB) (Applied Biosciences). All samples were run in duplicate. The relative quantity (RQ) values were calculated according to the ΔΔCt method. The infected mice were normalized to the values obtained from non-infected mice (ΔΔCT). Then, the RQ was calculated as RQ = 2-ΔΔCt.

Statistical analysis

For each parameter measured, data were plotted using GraphPad Prism 9.4.1 software (GraphPad). Treatments were compared at each timepoint to infected untreated controls or naïve mice, as indicated in the figures using a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA and Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests. When comparing only two groups, a Mann-Whitney test was used. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Curative Benznidazole treatment reduces T. cruzi induced hepatomegaly

In Liu et al, 2023, we previously reported that combination treatment with low BNZ + vaccine better restored T. cruzi induced metabolic perturbances in several sections of heart compared to curative BNZ treatment [30]. However, that work did not evaluate the impact of treatments on liver health. Hepatomegaly is a consistent finding in human cases of Chagas disease as well as experimental animal models [31]. To determine if hepatomegaly was also present in our model of chronic T. cruzi infection, the liver weight/ body weight ratio was calculated at study endpoints. The liver weight/ body weight ratio was significantly increased by infection at 90 and 142 DPI (Fig 2C, red and purple symbols, respectively) compared to naïve controls, indicating hepatomegaly was evident in our model. By 142 DPI, curative BNZ significantly reduced liver weight/body weight ratio compared to infected control mice (Fig 2C maroon symbol), suggesting that curative BNZ treatment ameliorates infection-induced hepatomegaly. However, low BNZ + vaccine had no apparent effect on hepatomegaly. Additionally, infection alone did not induce significant changes in overall body weight compared to naïve controls, but low BNZ + vaccine resulted in overall lower body weight compared to controls (Fig 2A). Overall liver weight was significantly increased only at 90 DPI when compared to naïve controls, but liver weight was not increased at other timepoints or with any treatments. Together, these data confirm hepatomegaly is evident in our mouse model and that curative BNZ reduces infection induced hepatomegaly by 142dpi, but does not restore liver weight/body weight ratio to the same level as age matched naïve mice.

Fig 2. Body weight, liver weight, and liver weight/body weight ratio of mice at 90 dpi, 120dpi and 142dpi.

Fig 2

Body (A) and liver (B) weights were taken at time of euthanasia. A ratio was calculated to normalize results. *P <0.05; ***P <0.0005; ****P <0.0001.

Curative Benznidazole clears liver parasites and reduces cellular infiltration

We have previously demonstrated that vaccine-linked chemotherapy significantly reduces cardiac parasite burdens in acutely infected mice [24,25] and curative BNZ significantly reduces cardiac parasite burdens and reduces cellular infiltration in chronically infected mice immediately after treatment [32]. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of treatments on parasite levels and cellular infiltration in the liver. Infection resulted in significantly increased infiltration of inflammatory cells into the liver at 90dpi and 142 dpi compared to naïve mice at 142dpi (Fig 3B red and purple symbols, respectively). Additionally, infection induced inflammatory infiltrate was significantly reduced at 120dpi compared to 90 dpi (Fig 3B green and red symbols, respectively), but inflammatory infiltrate at 142dpi was not significantly different to 90dpi (Fig 3B maroon and red symbols respectively). Curative BNZ effectively decreased parasite burden in the liver to below the limits of quantitation for the assay (Fig 3A maroon symbol), while low BNZ + vaccine had no effect on parasite burdens (Fig 3A blue symbols). Evaluation of H&E stained liver sections revealed that treatment with low BNZ significantly increased inflammatory infiltrate at 120 DPI compared to infected untreated mice. (Fig 3B orange symbol Fig 4E). However, curative BNZ significantly decreased inflammatory infiltrate compared to infected untreated mice (Fig 3B maroon symbol, Fig 4I), while low BNZ + vaccine did not affect the number of inflammatory cells (Fig 3B dark blue symbol, Fig 4H).

Fig 3. Parasite burden and amount of inflammatory infiltrate in the liver.

Fig 3

T. cruzi parasite burden expressed as parasite equivalents per mg of tissue (A) was determined using qPCR and inflammatory infiltrate was determined via histopathology analysis using ImageJ (B). *P <0.05; **P <0.005. $ $ $ P<0.001 when compared to Infected Untreated at 90dpi.

Fig 4. Impact of therapeutic interventions on the inflammatory infiltrate of liver tissue in mice.

Fig 4

Representative H&E stained sections are shown at 142dpi Naïve (A), 90dpi Infected Untreated (B), 120 Infected Untreated (C), 142dpi Untreated (D), 120dpi Low BNZ (E), 120dpi Vaccine (F), 120dpi E6020 (G), 142dpi Vaccine + Low BNZ (H), 142dpi Curative BNZ (I). The scale bar represents 100um.

Curative Benznidazole significantly elevates serum tissue damage markers

To determine the effect of treatments on tissue damage markers as indicators of liver damage, we evaluated levels of ALT, ALP, AST and LDH. By 142dpi, both curative BNZ and low BNZ + vaccine induced significant elevations to ALT (Fig 5A, navy and maroon symbols, respectively) and AST (Fig 5C, navy and maroon symbols, respectively) and AST when compared to naïve mice. Importantly, only curative BNZ induced significant elevation to LDH (Fig 5D, maroon symbols) compared to naïve mice. Infection alone and single treatments did not cause significant elevations to AST, ALT and LDH. Further, no differences in ALP were observed for any groups. Together, these data suggest that our vaccine-linked chemotherapy strategy causes less liver and tissue damage compared to curative BNZ alone.

Fig 5. Impact of infection and treatment on liver enzymes.

Fig 5

Complete serum chemistry analysis was performed. ALT, ALP, AST, and LDH were evaluated because they are the most common liver function tests. *P ≤0.05; **P ≤0.01.

Benznidazole treatment reduces the expression of liver damage markers

To begin to define potential mechanism of liver damage in our model, we evaluated expression of BTG2, a marker of oxidative damage, and PPARα, a regulator of inflammation [3335]. BTG2 expression was elevated by 120 DPI in infected mice compared to 90 DPI and 142DPI (Fig 6A green symbols), and expression at 142dpi was significantly elevated compared to 90 DPI (Fig 6A purple and red symbols respectively). BTG2 expression was significantly decreased by low BNZ treatment (Fig 6A orange symbols) compared to infection alone at 120 DPI (Fig 6A green symbols). Similarly, by 142 DPI, infection induced BTG2 expression was significantly reduced by curative BNZ treatment (Fig 6A maroon symbols). Expression of PPARα was significantly elevated by infection at 142 DPI (Fig 6B purple symbols) compared to 90DPI and 120DPI (Fig 6B red and green symbols, respectively). Only low BNZ significantly decreased PPARα expression by 120DPI (Fig 6B orange symbols) compared to infected mice at 120 DPI (Fig 6B orange symbols). Together, these data suggest that while low dose BNZ treatment can improve oxidative damage and regulation of inflammation in the liver, the combination of low BNZ + vaccine does not result in similar improvement.

Fig 6. Infection status and treatments on expression of BTG2 and PPARα.

Fig 6

BTG2 and PPARα were measured in liver tissue. *P<0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P<0.001 ****P < 0.0001.

Discussion

The current first-line treatment for Chagas disease is oral BNZ, which is effective mainly in the acute phase but has unwanted side effects, including dermatologic and neurologic manifestations [36,37]. Liver toxicity from BZN is thought to be caused by the formation of reactive metabolites, which can damage liver cells and lead to inflammation and liver injury [36]. Symptoms of BZN-induced liver toxicity may include fatigue, abdominal pain, jaundice, and elevated liver enzymes in the blood [20]. Specifically, BNZ treatment results in elevations of AST, ALT, and ALP [38]. Our group has shown that a vaccine-linked chemotherapy strategy allows the reduction of BNZ dose, while still effectively reducing cardiac inflammation and fibrosis, and improving cardiac function [2426]. While the evidence showed that this dose-sparing strategy improved cardiac health, similar to a curative dose of BNZ, the impact of vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health was unknown. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the effects of curative benznidazole treatment and vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health. T. cruzi infection causes inflammation and edema, which can contribute to hepatomegaly [31]. Additionally, right-sided heart failure can cause congestion of the liver; thus, an increased liver weight can indicate cardiac dysfunction [39,40]. We confirmed in our model that curative BNZ treatment was able to ameliorate the infection-induced hepatomegaly, decrease liver parasite burdens, and reduce cellular infiltrate. This agrees with our prior observations in our chronic infection mouse model that curative BNZ significantly reduced cardiac parasite burdens and cardiac cellular infiltration immediately after treatment was completed [32], and reduced cardiac cellular infiltration over 3 months after treatment was completed [26]. In contrast, low BNZ + vaccine had no apparent effect on T. cruzi induced hepatomegaly, liver parasite burdens, or cellular infiltrate. We have previously shown that our Tc24-C4/E6020 SE vaccine induced increased antigen specific CD8+ cells in the spleen [25], thus it is possible that the cellular infiltrate within the liver of vaccinated mice showed no apparent reduction due to increased infiltration of antigen specific CD8+ cells into tissues, which could also contribute to overall enlargement. Additionally, in a dog model of acute T. cruzi infection, preventative vaccination with a DNA vaccine modified the composition of the cardiac inflammatory infiltrate from primarily mononuclear cells in infected unvaccinated dogs, to polymorphonuclear cells in infected vaccinated dogs [41]. Further analysis of the specific cell types present in the liver would be necessary to define specific cell types in inflammatory infiltrate and determine if low BNZ + vaccine modified the composition of cells. Additionally, while we did not observe reductions in parasite burdens in the liver in mice treated with low BNZ + vaccine, it is possible that parasite burdens were reduced in other organs. Evaluation of other tissues including gastrointestinal tract, which is a demonstrated reservoir for the parasite [29], would be necessary to determine if treatment reduced overall parasite burdens.

Despite the positive impact of curative BNZ on hepatomegaly, parasite burden, and inflammation, significant elevations in AST, ALT and LDH indicate that tissue damage was still evident. ALT is abundantly expressed in the liver, and elevated serum levels indicate liver damage, while AST and ALP are expressed in multiple tissues, including the liver, heart, and muscle [4244]. In experimental mouse models of acute Chagas disease, it has been demonstrated that the combined effect of both infection and BNZ treatment induced more elevation of serum AST, ALT, and ALP, as well as direct liver damage on histopathology, than either infection or BNZ administration alone [21]. Our results showed elevated serum ALT and AST levels in the group treated with the curative dose of BNZ, indicating that in mouse models of chronic Chagas disease curative BNZ treatment causes elevations in tissue damage markers similar to acute infection models. In our study, curative BNZ treatment was administered from approximately 70 dpi until 87 DPI; thus, endpoint serum samples collected at 142 DPI were 55 days after treatment ended. Since both AST and ALT were still elevated at that time in mice treated with curative BNZ, this indicates that despite significantly reducing parasite burdens and inflammatory cell infiltrate curative BNZ treatment caused sustained tissue damage, further supporting the need for less toxic treatment options. Interestingly, treatment with either a low dose of BNZ alone or the Tc24-C4/ E6020 SE vaccine alone did not cause significantly elevated ALT or AST by 120dpi, which was approximately 32 and 36 days after treatment ended, respectively. This suggests low dose BNZ or vaccine do not cause as much tissue damage as curative BNZ treatment. However, the group treated with low BNZ + vaccine sequentially had elevated serum levels of ALT and AST at 142dpi, similar to curative BNZ. This suggests that despite the dose sparing effect of this strategy, the combination of treatments does still result in elevation of tissue damage enzymes, possibly due to combined effects of reactive metabolites resulting from BNZ treatment [36] and activation of inflammatory pathways by E6020, the TLR4 agonist adjuvant use in the vaccine component [45,46]. Further studies evaluating ALT and AST at later timepoints after treatment would be needed to determine if the elevations in these tissue damage markers is sustained or if the elevations are transient and ultimately return to normal levels.

In addition to ALT, AST, and ALP, we evaluated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, which are also abundantly expressed in the liver, heart, and muscle tissues [47,48]. In damaged tissues, LDH leaks out of the tissues and into the serum [49]. The elevated LDH levels of curative BNZ-treated mice suggest that the drug has hepatotoxic effects on tissues, which may lead to acute liver failure [50]. Furthermore, previous studies have also concluded that LDH is a good prognosticator for death in individuals with acute liver failure [51]. Studies in mice acutely infected with T. cruzi show that LDH levels are detectable in both serum and tissues at the early stages of infection, with elevations evident in serum before tissue damage is evident microscopically [47]. This suggests that LDH elevations caused by T. cruzi are due to the combined effect of early changes in cell membrane permeability and later structural damage to tissues [47]. Our results showed that only treatment with the curative dose of BNZ resulted in significant elevations in serum LDH levels. Importantly, the lack of LDH elevation in mice receiving low BNZ + vaccine suggests that this treatment is less damaging to tissues, potentially in both the liver and heart, than curative BNZ. Considering the know exacerbation of liver damage caused by the combined effects of T. cruzi infection and BNZ [21], a less damaging treatment strategy, such as vaccine-linked chemotherapy, is desirable to preserve overall health.

In an effort to further characterize potential mechanisms of liver-specific damage in our model, we evaluated gene expression of B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) and Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). BTG2 is a protein-coding gene involved in various cellular processes, including cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, differentiation, hepatic gluconeogenesis, and lipid homeostasis [5254]. Importantly, BTG2 is induced in response to DNA damage, and upregulation of BTG2 has been shown to protect against oxidative stress in human mammary epithelial cells [33,34]. T. cruzi infection leads to DNA damage in mouse models, specifically in heart cells and splenocytes, due to induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and BNZ has been shown to reduce that effect [55,56]. In our study, treatment with either low BNZ or curative BNZ significantly decreased BTG2 expression levels compared to infected, untreated mice at 120 DPI and 142 DPI, respectively. This suggests that in addition to DNA damage in the heart, T. cruzi also induces DNA damage in the liver leading to elevated BTG2 expression, which is ameliorated with BNZ treatment. BTG2 expression is also upregulated in response to inflammatory stimuli, including IL-6 and NFκB [57]. In prior studies, we showed that curative BNZ treatment of chronically infected mice did not significantly reduce NFκB, pSTAT3, or IL-6 in cardiac tissue [32]. However, specific evaluation of NFκB and IL-6 in the liver would be needed to determine if curative BNZ treatments has a tissue specific impact on those inflammatory stimuli. PPARα is involved in regulating lipid and glucose metabolism, is abundantly expressed in the liver, and is critical for reducing inflammation and protecting against liver injury [35,58,59]. In T. cruzi infected macrophages, PPARα ligands drive M1-to-M2 conversion, regulating inflammatory responses [60]. We observed that low BNZ significantly reduced expression of PPARα in the liver, similar to the effect on BTG2 expression. While this reduction did not have an apparent effect on liver cellular infiltrate, further studies would be needed to determine any impact on other inflammatory markers specifically in the liver.

Limitations of this study were identified and have been considered in the interpretation of our results and planning of future studies. This study focused on evaluating liver damage in our female mouse model of T. cruzi infection, which we have used extensively to confirm efficacy of our vaccine-linked chemotherapy strategy [2426]. Additionally, studies of sex related differences in drug induced liver toxicity have demonstrated that women are more likely to present with drug-induced hepatotoxicity [61]. However, a 10 year longitudinal study of patients with Chagas disease found that male patients developed cardiac disease at a higher rate compared to female patients [62]. Further, heart failure can also result in liver damage [63]. Thus, in future studies it will be essential to specifically evaluate the impact of T. cruzi infection and vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health in male mice and compare to the impact in female mice. Another limitation identified in this study is the limited time points after infection and treatment that were evaluated. In this study we evaluated liver health primarily at 120 DPI and 142 DPI, representing early chronic infection, to evaluate short term effects of our treatments compared to infected untreated mice at each timepoint. However, future studies will need to incorporate evaluation of all groups immediately after treatment as well as at later time points to determine the duration of any treatment effects on liver health. Indeed, we observed elevated AST and ALT in mice treated with low BNZ + vaccine at 142DPI, representing approximately 36 days after treatment ended. It is possible that at later timepoints, AST and ALT levels would return to normal range indicating that any toxic effects in the liver are transient. Finally, cardiac fibrosis is a consistent finding in chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy, and is associated with more severe cardiac disease [64,65]. Because the relationship between the heart health and liver health has been demonstrated, assessing whether our treatment affects liver fibrosis will also be important.

BNZ treatment of patients with Chagas disease is problematic due to prolonged treatment courses and significant toxicity, resulting in up to 40% of patients terminating treatment early [15,37]. We developed a vaccine-linked chemotherapy strategy that is dose-sparing, and demonstrated to be efficacious at reducing cardiac pathology in preclinical models [2426]. Here we present data suggesting that in addition to the beneficial cardiac effects, vaccine-linked chemotherapy may be less damaging to the liver compared to curative BNZ treatment. While additional studies are needed to develop optimized multi-modal treatment strategies that further improve liver health, these data further support vaccine-linked chemotherapy as an attractive strategy to bridge the efficacy and tolerability gaps of standard anti-parasitic treatment for patients with Chagas disease, and ultimately improve overall health.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Center for Comparative Medicine Research Services Laboratory at Baylor College of Medicine.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by a grant from the Southern Star Medical Research Institute to PJH. The Pathology and Histology Core at Baylor College of Medicine supported this work with funding from the NIH (P30 CA125123). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Cantey PT, Stramer SL, Townsend RL, Kamel H, Ofafa K, Todd CW, et al. CDC—Chagas Disease—Detailed Fact Sheet. Transfusion. 2022;52(9):1922–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chagas disease (also known as American trypanosomiasis) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis)
  • 3.Carlier Y, Altcheh J, Angheben A, Freilij H, Luquetti AO, Schijman AG, et al. Congenital Chagas disease: Updated recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of newborns and siblings, girls, women of childbearing age, and pregnant women. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2019;13(10). Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC6812740/ doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Montgomery SP, Parise ME, Dotson EM, Bialek SR. What Do We Know About Chagas Disease in the United States? Am J Trop Med Hyg [Internet]. 2016;95(6):1225. Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC5154432/ doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nieto-Sanchez C, Baus EG, Guerrero D, Grijalva MJ. Positive deviance study to inform a Chagas disease control program insouthern Ecuador. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz [Internet]. 2015;110(3):299. Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC4489467/ doi: 10.1590/0074-02760140472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Organization WH. Chagas disease. 2019; Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(american-trypanosomiasis)
  • 7.Zhang L, Tarleton RL. Parasite persistence correlates with disease severity and localization in chronic Chagas’ disease. J Infect Dis [Internet]. 1999;180(2):480–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10395865 doi: 10.1086/314889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marinho CR, D’Império Lima MR, Grisotto MG, Alvarez JM. Influence of acute-phase parasite load on pathology, parasitism, and activation of the immune system at the late chronic phase of Chagas’ disease. Infect Immun. 1999. Jan;67(1):308–18. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.1.308-318.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Echavarría NG, Echeverría LE, Stewart M, Gallego C, Saldarriaga C. Chagas Disease: Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46(3). doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2019.100507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE, et al. Chagas Cardiomyopathy: An Update of Current Clinical Knowledge and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018/10/26. 2018;138(12):e169–209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pinazo MJ, Cañas E, Elizalde JI, García M, Gascón J, Gimeno F, et al. Diagnosis, management and treatment of chronic Chagas’ gastrointestinal disease in areas where Trypanosoma cruzi infection is not endemic. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. Mar;33(3):191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sardinha LR, Mosca T, Elias RM, do Nascimento RS, Gonçalves LA, Bucci DZ, et al. The liver plays a major role in clearance and destruction of blood trypomastigotes in Trypanosoma cruzi chronically infected mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010/01/07. 2010;4(1):e578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cardoso MS, Reis-Cunha JL, Bartholomeu DC. Evasion of the Immune Response by Trypanosoma cruzi during Acute Infection. Front Immunol [Internet]. 2015;6:659. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834737 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ramos-Tovar E, Muriel P. Molecular Mechanisms That Link Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Fibrosis in the Liver. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2020. Dec;9(12). doi: 10.3390/antiox9121279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Urbina JA. Specific chemotherapy of Chagas disease: relevance, current limitations and new approaches. Acta Trop. 2010;115(1–2):55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crespillo-Andújar C, Comeche B, Hamer DH, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Alvarez-Díaz N, Zamora J, et al. Use of benznidazole to treat chronic Chagas disease: An updated systematic review with a meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2022;16(5):e0010386. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pinazo M-J, Muñoz J, Posada E, López-Chejade P, Gállego M, Ayala E, et al. Tolerance of benznidazole in treatment of Chagas’ disease in adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010. Nov;54(11):4896–9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00537-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shankar K, Mehendale HM. Cytochrome P450. Encycl Toxicol Third Ed. 2014;1125–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Iwakiri Y, Kim MY. Nitric oxide in liver diseases. Vol. 36, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. Elsevier Ltd; 2015. p. 524–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Junckerstorff RK, Murray RJ. Benznidazole. Kucers Use Antibiot A Clin Rev Antibacterial, Antifung Antiparasit Antivir Drugs, Seventh Ed [Internet]. 2020;3205–10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK548076/ [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Novaes RD, Santos EC, Cupertino MC, Bastos DSS, Oliveira JM, Carvalho T V, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi infection and benznidazole therapy independently stimulate oxidative status and structural pathological remodeling of the liver tissue in mice. Parasitol Res. 2015. Aug;114(8):2873–81. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4488-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dumonteil E, Bottazzi ME, Zhan B, Heffernan MJ, Jones K, Valenzuela JG, et al. Accelerating the development of a therapeutic vaccine for human Chagas disease: rationale and prospects. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012. Sep;11(9):1043–55. doi: 10.1586/erv.12.85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Seid CA, Jones KM, Pollet J, Keegan B, Hudspeth E, Hammond M, et al. Cysteine mutagenesis improves the production without abrogating antigenicity of a recombinant protein vaccine candidate for human chagas disease. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017. Mar;13(3):621–33. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1242540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones K, Versteeg L, Damania A, Keegan B, Kendricks A, Pollet J, et al. Vaccine-Linked Chemotherapy Improves Benznidazole Efficacy for Acute Chagas Disease. Infect Immun. 2018. Apr;86(4). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00876-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cruz-Chan J V, Villanueva-Lizama LE, Versteeg L, Damania A, Villar MJ, Gonzalez-Lopez C, et al. Vaccine-linked chemotherapy induces IL-17 production and reduces cardiac pathology during acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2021/02/07. 2021;11(1):3222. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547365 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82930-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jones KM, Mangin EN, Reynolds CL, Villanueva LE, Cruz JV, Versteeg L, et al. Vaccine-linked chemotherapy improves cardiac structure and function in a mouse model of chronic Chagas disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol [Internet]. 2023;13:1106315. Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC9947347/ doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1106315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ruiz-Sanchez R, Leon MP, Matta V, Reyes PA, Lopez R, Jay D, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from Mexican and Guatemalan acute and chronic chagasic cardiopathy patients belong to Trypanosoma cruzi I. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2005/08/23. 2005;100(3):281–3. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762005000300012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Branchini BR, Ablamsky DM, Davis AL, Southworth TL, Butler B, Fan F, et al. Red-emitting luciferases for bioluminescence reporter and imaging applications. Anal Biochem. 2010. Jan;396(2):290–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lewis MD, Fortes Francisco A, Taylor MC, Burrell-Saward H, McLatchie AP, Miles MA, et al. Bioluminescence imaging of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infections reveals tissue-specific parasite dynamics and heart disease in the absence of locally persistent infection. Cell Microbiol. 2014/04/10. 2014;16(9):1285–300. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu Z, Ulrich vonBargen R, Kendricks AL, Wheeler K, Leão AC, Sankaranarayanan K, et al. Localized cardiac small molecule trajectories and persistent chemical sequelae in experimental Chagas disease. Nat Commun. 2023. Oct;14(1):6769. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42247-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vacani-Martins N, Meuser-Batista M, Dos Santos C de LP, Hasslocher-Moreno AM, Henriques-Pons A. The Liver and the Hepatic Immune Response in Trypanosoma cruzi Infection, a Historical and Updated View. Pathogens [Internet]. 2021;10(9). Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC8465576/ doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hoffman KA, Villar MJ, Poveda C, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ, Tweardy DJ, et al. Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-3 Modulation of Cardiac Pathology in Chronic Chagasic Cardiomyopathy. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:708325. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.708325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cortes U, Moyret-Lalle C, Falette N, Duriez C, Ghissassi F El, Barnas C, et al. Brief Communication BTG Gene Expression in the p53-Dependent and-Independent Cellular Response to DNA Damage. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions [PubMed]
  • 34.Karve TM, Rosen EM. B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) stimulates cellular antioxidant defenses through the antioxidant transcription factor NFE2L2 in human mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem [Internet]. 2012;287(37):31503–14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22493435/ doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.367433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Todisco S, Santarsiero A, Convertini P, De Stefano G, Gilio M, Iacobazzi V, et al. PPAR Alpha as a Metabolic Modulator of the Liver: Role in the Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). Biology (Basel) [Internet]. 2022;11(5). Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC9138523/ doi: 10.3390/biology11050792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Castro JA, de Mecca MM, Bartel LC. Toxic side effects of drugs used to treat Chagas’ disease (American trypanosomiasis). Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006. Aug;25(8):471–9. doi: 10.1191/0960327106het653oa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Molina I, Salvador F, Sanchez-Montalva A, Trevino B, Serre N, Sao Aviles A, et al. Toxic Profile of Benznidazole in Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease: Risk Factors and Comparison of the Product from Two Different Manufacturers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother [Internet]. 2015/07/22. 2015;59(10):6125–31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26195525 doi: 10.1128/AAC.04660-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pavan TBS, Silva JW da, Martins LC, Costa SCB, Almeida EA de. Hepatic changes by benznidazole in a specific treatment for Chagas disease. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.El Hadi H, Di Vincenzo A, Vettor R, Rossato M. Relationship between Heart Disease and Liver Disease: A Two-Way Street. Cells. 2020. Feb;9(3). doi: 10.3390/cells9030567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saraiva RM, Felippe Mediano MF, SNS Mendes F, Marcelo Sperandio da Silva G, Veloso HH, Henrique Sangenis LC, et al. World Journal of Cardiology Chagas heart disease: An overview of diagnosis, manifestations, treatment, and care Country/Territory of origin: Brazil Specialty type: Tropical medicine Provenance and peer review: Peer-review model: Single blind Peer-review r. Available from: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i12.654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Aparicio-Burgos JE, Ochoa-García L, Zepeda-Escobar JA, Gupta S, Dhiman M, Martínez JS, et al. Testing the efficacy of a multi-component DNA-prime/DNA-boost vaccine against Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(5):e1050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jiang X, Chang H, Zhou Y. Expression, purification and preliminary crystallographic studies of human glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 1 (GOT1). Protein Expr Purif [Internet]. 2015;113:102–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26003525/ doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2015.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang RZ, Park S, Reagan WJ, Goldstein R, Zhong S, Lawton M, et al. Alanine aminotransferase isoenzymes: molecular cloning and quantitative analysis of tissue expression in rats and serum elevation in liver toxicity. Hepatology [Internet]. 2009;49(2):598–607. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19085960/ doi: 10.1002/hep.22657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vimalraj S. Alkaline phosphatase: Structure, expression and its function in bone mineralization. 2020; Available from: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ishizaka ST, Hawkins LD. E6020: a synthetic Toll-like receptor 4 agonist as a vaccine adjuvant. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007/10/13. 2007;6(5):773–84. doi: 10.1586/14760584.6.5.773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kuzmich NN, Sivak K V, Chubarev VN, Porozov YB, Savateeva-Lyubimova TN, Peri F. TLR4 Signaling Pathway Modulators as Potential Therapeutics in Inflammation and Sepsis. Vaccines. 2017. Oct;5(4). doi: 10.3390/vaccines5040034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cano RC, Hliba E, Rubiolo ER. Creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase levels as potential indicators of Trypanosoma cruzi infectivity and histotropism in experimental Chagas’ disease. Parasitol Res [Internet]. 2000;86(3):244–52. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10726996/ doi: 10.1007/s004360050038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lin L, Sylvén C, Sotonyi P, Somogyi E, Kaijser L, Jansson E. Lactate dehydrogenase and its isoenzyme activities in different parts of the normal human heart. Cardiovasc Res [Internet]. 1989;23(7):601–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2598214/ doi: 10.1093/cvr/23.7.601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Farhana A, Lappin SL. Biochemistry, Lactate Dehydrogenase. StatPearls; [Internet]. 2022; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557536/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kotoh K, Kato M, Kohjima M, Tanaka M, Miyazaki M, Nakamura K, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase production in hepatocytes is increased at an early stage of acute liver failure. Exp Ther Med [Internet]. 2011;2(2):195–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22977488/ doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vazquez JH, Kennon-Mcgill S, Byrum SD, Mackintosh SG, Jaeschke H, Williams DK, et al. Proteomics Indicates Lactate Dehydrogenase Is Prognostic in Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Failure Patients and Reveals Altered Signaling Pathways. Toxicol Sci [Internet]. 2022;187(1):25. Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC9216044/ doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hwang S-L, Kwon O, Lee SJ, Roh S-S, Kim YD, Choi JH. B-cell translocation gene-2 increases hepatic gluconeogenesis via induction of CREB. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012. Nov;427(4):801–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.09.146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jo J-R, An S, Ghosh S, Nedumaran B, Kim YD. Growth hormone promotes hepatic gluconeogenesis by enhancing BTG2-YY1 signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2021. Sep;11(1):18999. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98537-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim YD, Kim SG, Hwang SL, Choi HS, Bae JH, Song DK, et al. B-cell translocation gene 2 regulates hepatic glucose homeostasis via induction of orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 in diabetic mouse model. Diabetes. 2014;63(6):1870–80. doi: 10.2337/db13-1368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Florentino PTV, Mendes D, Vitorino FNL, Martins DJ, Cunha JPC, Mortara RA, et al. DNA damage and oxidative stress in human cells infected by Trypanosoma cruzi. PLOS Pathog [Internet]. 2021;17(4):e1009502. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1009502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ribeiro DA, Calvi SA, Picka MM, Persi E, de Carvalho TB, Caetano PK, et al. DNA damage and nitric oxide synthesis in experimentally infected Balb/c mice with Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp Parasitol. 2007. Jul;116(3):296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kim SH, Jung IR, Hwang SS. Emerging role of anti-proliferative protein BTG1 and BTG2. BMB Rep [Internet]. 2022;55(8):380–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35880434/ doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2022.55.8.092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Burri L, Thoresen GH, Berge RK. The Role of PPARα Activation in Liver and Muscle. PPAR Res [Internet]. 2010;2010:11. Available from: file:///pmc/articles/PMC2933910/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hu DD, Zhao Q, Cheng Y, Xiao XR, Huang JF, Qu Y, et al. The Protective Roles of PPARα Activation in Triptolide-Induced Liver Injury. Toxicol Sci [Internet]. 2019;171(1):1–12. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/article/171/1/1/5523250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Penas F, Mirkin GA, Vera M, Cevey Á, González CD, Gómez MI, et al. Treatment in vitro with PPARα and PPARγ ligands drives M1-to-M2 polarization of macrophages from T. cruzi-infected mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015. May;1852(5):893–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Guy J, Peters MG. Liver disease in women: the influence of gender on epidemiology, natural history, and patient outcomes. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013. Oct;9(10):633–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VMC, Di Lorenzo Oliveira C, Antunes AP, Menezes MM, et al. Ten-Year incidence of chagas cardiomyopathy among asymptomatic trypanosoma cruzi-seropositive former blood donors. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1105–15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.123612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Møller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and the liver. Eur Heart J. 2013. Sep;34(36):2804–11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bonney KM, Luthringer DJ, Kim SA, Garg NJ, Engman DM. Pathology and Pathogenesis of Chagas Heart Disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2018/10/26. 2019;14:421–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nardi Gemme C, Silva TQAC, Martins LC, da Silva LM, Paim LR, Sposito A, et al. Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis and Cardiomyocyte Diameter Are Associated With Heart Failure Symptoms in Chagas Cardiomyopathy. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:880151. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.880151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011519.r001

Decision Letter 0

Renata Rosito Tonelli, Abhay R Satoskar

10 Oct 2023

Dear Kathryn Jones,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "The impact of vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health in a mouse model of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Renata Rosito Tonelli, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abhay Satoskar

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: No issues

Reviewer #2: This study was designed to verified weather low doses of the anti-parasitic drug benznidazole (BNZ) combined with a prototype therapeutic vaccine is effective in controlling parasite infection without causing liver damage. BNZ is a drug known to cause liver damage if administered with a curative dose. In a previous study the authors showed that a combination of low dose plus a recombinant protein vaccine can effectively reduce T. cruzi induced cardiac damage. Here, the authors evaluated several markers of liver health after treatment with low dose BNZ plus the vaccine therapy. The authors showed that, as expected, treatment of infected mice with curative doses of BNZ reduces parasite burden but elevates serum levels of several toxicity markers. However, neither low doses of BNZ or low doses plus vaccine results in reduced parasite burden but low doses plus vaccine results in a slight better outcome in terms of liver toxicity compared to the effect of a curative dose of BNZ. This is a well conducted and useful study that may help optimize the treatment for Chagas disease. All the objectives of the study were clearly articulated with a testable hypothesis, and the study design appropriately addresses its objectives. Proper statistical analysis was used to support the conclusions and all ethical requirements regarding animal use have been met.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: See general comments

Reviewer #2: The experiments were well designed, and the results of the analysis were clearly presented, with all figures having good quality. As indicated below, I have few criticisms regarding the lack of statistical significance analyses of part of the data, which would be important to strengthen some of the authors conclusions.

Line 160, the authors used bioluminescent parasites but on line 180 they indicated that tissue parasite burden was determined only by quantitative real-time PCR. Please explain why luciferase expressing parasites were used. Also, regarding parasite burden, on Figure 3 it should be indicated how the parasite numbers were calculated (is it per mg of tissue?).

Fig 2, line 238, the authors claimed that “these data confirm hepatomegaly is evident in our model and that only curative BNZ ameliorates this finding.” However, the difference in the liver weight/body weight is minimal. Therefore, the sentence should be changed to “these data confirm hepatomegaly is evident in our model and that curative BNZ slightly ameliorates this finding”. None of the other treatments had an impact in liver health based on the liver weight/body weight ratio. Why the liver weight/body weight ratio was not measured in animals treated with low plus vaccine and curative BNZ doses at 90 dpi, when this ration was much higher compared to the ration at 142 dpi?

Fig 3, lane 254: are there statistically significance differences in inflammatory infiltrate between infected untreated at 90 dpi and 120 dpi? Or between naïve and infected untreated at 142 dpi? Please indicate in the text. Again, like the liver weight/body weight ratio, the main increase in inflammatory infiltrate is observed at 90 dpi. Why was the effect of curative BNZ only measured 142 dpi when just a small decrease compared to infected untreated mice was observed? Also, the authors claims that curative BNZ significantly decreased inflammatory infiltrate compared to infected untreated mice, however, it was not clear whether the inflammatory infiltrate in the liver of untreated infected mice was increased compared to naïve mice.

Fig 5, lane 273: are there statistically significance differences in levels of ALT and AST between naïve and infected untreated mice at any dpi? If not, the observations that both curative BNZ and low BNZ + vaccine induced significant elevations to ALT by 142dpi, compared to naïve animals may suggests that the liver damage occurs in response to the treatment and not to the infection. Increased tissue damage was detected when infected and curative BNZ treated mice was compared to mice infected at the same dpi. Based solely on this, the authors could not claim that the “vaccine-linked chemotherapy strategy causes less liver and tissue damage compared to curative BNZ alone”

Fig 6, line 289: In contrast to the results obtained with enzyme assays, it looks like the authors were able to observe signs of increased liver damage in infected untreated animals at 120 dpi compared to 90 dpi and when 142 dpi was compared to 90 dpi using the expression of a marker of oxidative damage (BTG2) and a regulator of inflammation (PPARα). Again, are these differences statistically significant? If so, it should be mentioned. It should be also mentioned that although low BNZ treatment can reduce oxidative damage and regulation of inflammation, low BNZ + vaccine does not contribute for a reduction of these parameters the same way that this treatment does not cause a reduction in inflammatory infiltrate.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: See general comments

Reviewer #2: Most of the authors conclusions are supported by the data presented, but, for the sake of clarity, in the abstract, the conclusion sentence should be modified to “These data confirm toxicity associated with curative doses of BNZ and suggest that, although the dose sparing low BNZ plus vaccine treatment does not reduce parasite burden, it better preserves liver health.”

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: See general comments

Reviewer #2: no comments

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This paper focuses on liver toxicity issues during Chagas disease and during therapy using a mouse model. Parasite infected animals are compared with infected animals treated with either high-dose benznidazole (BNZ) therapy and those treated with low-dose BNZ+vaccine, a previously described subunit vaccine. This latter combination has been shown to result in decrease cardiac disease while have the advantage of reduced exposure to the toxicities of high dose BNZ monotherapy. Overall, the study found that high dose BNZ reduced liver parasite burden and inflammation but leads to liver toxicity as measured liver and tissues enzyme elevations. Low-dose BNZ+vaccine dose not reduce parasite burdens or tissue inflammation but results in similar toxicity to HD-BNZ whereas LD-BNZ alone or vaccine alone does not.

Overall the experiments are performed well and the data justifies the conclusions.

1) The major issue is that while the LD BNZ-vaccine combo appears to not have significant liver toxicity, it does not have any impact on parasites in the liver. And while the use of this treatment may indeed be important on cardiac disease it does not treat Chagas liver disease. Whether it reduces or ameliorates parasitization of other tissues is unknown. By extension, how does one treat Chagas liver disease without high dose BNZ? If using LD-BNZ+vaccine for cardiac disease, one would still need another agent to treat disease in the liver or other organs.

2) Both HD-BNZ and LD-BNZ+vaccine treatment induces ALT, AST release from liver of infected mice when compared to naive controls (Fig. 5 A and B). There are no controls of naïve mice treated with either drug alone. In the case of HD-BNZ this could be interpreted as turnover of parasites in the liver affecting hepatocyte toxicity. In the case of LD-BNZ+vaccine there is no demonstrable effect on parasite turnover yet there is still liver toxicity. Why do the authors conclude that this treatment doesn’t produce liver toxicity (lines 279-280 and in line 50), but later state that this isn’t the case (356-359)? LD-BNZ alone or vaccine alone did not result in AST/ALT elevations the combo did leading one to conclude that these synergize to induce toxicity during dual therapy. Perhaps the authors should elaborate on how this may happen.

3) Regarding the statistics, it is hard to understand why some groups are not statistically different than others just based on the visual representation. For example, Fig 5A, LD-BNZ alone and vaccine alone look even more statistically different to either LD-BNZ+vaccine or HD-BNZ than does naïve mice and LD-BNZ+vaccine or HD-BNZ. Why are they not?

4) There are some minor grammatical issues: line 357, 375, different fonts between lines 443-445.

Reviewer #2: please see comments above.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011519.r003

Decision Letter 1

Renata Rosito Tonelli, Abhay R Satoskar

9 Nov 2023

Dear Dr Kathryn M. Jones

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'The impact of vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health in a mouse model of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Renata Rosito Tonelli, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abhay Satoskar

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011519.r004

Acceptance letter

Renata Rosito Tonelli, Abhay R Satoskar

15 Nov 2023

Dear Dr. Jones,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "The impact of vaccine-linked chemotherapy on liver health in a mouse model of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 11-6-23 Response letter.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES