Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Nov 9;30(57):120540–120551. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30791-3

Potentially toxic elements in different tissues of great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) at a wetland area

József Lehel 1,2, Adrienn Grúz 3, András Bartha 4, László Menyhárt 5, Rita Szabó 6, Kocsner Tibor 7, Péter Budai 6,
PMCID: PMC10697887  PMID: 37943439

Abstract

Concentrations of 4 potentially toxic elements (As, Cd, Hg, Pb) were investigated in the feather, liver, kidney, and bone of great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo). The tissue samples were taken at the Central Tisza - Jászság Nature Conservation Area in Hungary. They were analysed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). The goal of the investigation was to analyse the metal burden of the above-mentioned elements in the various tissues of these wild birds and to provide important information for monitoring the environmental pollution.

Amongst the examined potentially toxic elements no statistical gender difference was observed, so the data were not separated based on them during the statistical analysis. The concentration of mercury was the highest in the feather, followed by the liver, kidney, and bone. The lead was detected in the feather with the highest level followed by the kidney, liver, and bone. The cadmium was determined in all investigated tissues with the next descending order: kidney > bone > liver > feather. Highest arsenic concentration was measured in the feather, followed by liver, kidney, and bone with the same concentration.

The detected concentrations of the investigated potentially toxic elements in different tissues of great cormorants (feathers, liver, kidney, bone) means that the living area of this birds is not highly contaminated to induce health problems or toxic signs, or even other undesirable effect in the animals.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-023-30791-3.

Keywords: Great cormorant, Bone, Feather, Kidney, Liver, Potentially toxic elements

Introduction

Potentially toxic metals can be found naturally in all ecosystems and released to the environment from many different anthropogenic sources such as industrial and agricultural activities (e.g. waste materials, mining processing, incineration, traffic) in various concentration (Hazrat et al. 2019). These elements that accumulate in the food net cause possible adverse effects on environmental and human health; thus, they have very important impact on the protection of the environment. These adverse effects on the environmental and health depend mostly on the mobility of metals through the different compartments (e.g. sediment, water, air) of the environment and the pathways to get into the body of a human or animals. A lot of research has been carried out to report and assess the behaviour of these metals in the environment (AMAP 1998; Hazrat et al. 2019). Based on the outcomes of these studies, the application of a lot of metals as plant protection products has been banned by the European and other commissions.

The bioaccumulation of each metal in the body of an animal depends on various factors such as biotic ones (body dimensions and mass, age, sex, diet, metabolism, and its position in the food chain) and abiotic ones (distribution of metals in its environment, salinity, temperature, and water pH, habitat type, and metal-metal interactions). But amongst all these factors, diet has the biggest influence. Usually, larger animals that are at the end of a food chain have higher metal concentrations in their tissues than smaller organisms they feed on (Catsiki et al. 1994; Al-Yousuf et al. 2000; Canli and Atli 2003; Storelli et al. 2005). So e.g. the consumption of fish exposed to different toxic heavy metals raises concerns and risks for health, not only for humans, especially in more sensitive groups of the human population (women, children), but also for birds that consume these fish (Hazrat et al. 2019).

Through contaminated water and food birds are directly exposed to potentially toxic metals and other contamination, because metals mostly enter the animals via their gastrointestinal system, and respiratory system and their skin (D’Haese et al. 2017). For most metals, the transport proteins of different biological membranes that these must pass through to get into the body have been identified already. These proteins are like transporters or molecules in the channel of cell membranes based on the selective binding receptors for the transportation of only one type of metal, not for all. These elements can be delivered to the organs and tissues via the bloodstream. From the digestive tract, the metals can be first transported to the liver by the portal circulation and then to the systemic circulation from there. Generally, the metals in the circulation can be bound to the erythrocytes or different plasma constituents (e.g. lead and organomercurials are delivered by erythrocytes, whilst inorganic mercuric derivatives and cadmium are bound to albumin section) (Lehel and Laczay 2011).

Different tissues (e.g. muscles, bones), organs (kidneys, liver), and the egg or feather of the birds can be used to analyse the difference at the level of distribution and accumulation of the chemical agents in the body of the birds (Burger and Gochfeld 2000a; Markowski et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2019; Mukhtar et al. 2020).

Deposition and release of metals take place in bones slowly during the mineral metabolism of homoiotherm vertebrates (Sánchez et al. 1987; Brandão-Neto et al. 1995; King et al. 2000), which is why the use for biomonitoring and ecotoxicological studies is not so frequent, compared to the kidneys and liver. Since these organs play a key role in the detoxification processes of metals, e.g. cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg), and can accumulate in the higher concentrations of various metals in a relatively short time (Wapnir 1998; Myklebust and Pedersen 1999; King et al. 2000; Barjaktarovic et al. 2002; Stout et al. 2002), these tissues are studied more commonly.

It is important to know that Cd mostly accumulates in higher concentration primarily in the kidneys (Chen et al. 2021) and only in a relatively insignificant concentration in muscle. Hg is accumulated mostly in the liver (Teunen et al. 2022) and Pb in bone (Rădulescu and Lundgren 2019).

Hard tissues (e.g. bones, feathers) can provide useful information about the accumulation and multiannual exposure to different metals. Bones are found to be a good example, due to the high affinity of Pb to bones (Pain et al. 2005; Swaileh and Sansur 2006; Ethier et al. 2007), the accumulation over a lifetime, and the effect on the nervous system (Pain 1996; Kalisinska 2000).

Roberts (1981) reported that liver in birds has a great potential to indicate the change of exposure via uptake from food because increases in the concentration measured in liver show potential adverse effects on the health of the birds.

Feathers is a useful indicator of different pollutants, since during the feather’s formation the concentration of elements can be agreed with the quantities found in them. Nowadays the use of feather tissue samples for biomonitoring is becoming a more common method since the bird biology is well known, they have quite a long life span, and they can be found and feed at various levels of the food chain (Abbasi et al. 2015; Burger and Gochfeld 2016; Grúz et al. 2015, 2018, 2019; Hamza et al. 2021).

The accumulated metals in the organs of birds, especially at high levels, can be harmful to their reproduction, survival, breeding, growth, moulting, and migration (Hutton 1981; Honda et al. 1985; Savinov et al. 2003; Canova et al. 2020). Because of these reasons, birds are the useful indicators of local, regional, and global metal contamination (Burger and Gochfeld 2016). Besides, the comparison of local species and the ones that migrate can provide us important information (Frederick et al. 1999).

The objective of this study was to investigate the metal burden of the liver, kidneys, bones, and feather tissues of great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) and thus the possible metal pollution in their feeding and nesting area at the Central Tisza - Jászság Nature Conservation Area of the Hortobágy National Park Directorate. Furthermore, the aim was to be able to obtain information about the possible contamination of the most important potentially toxic elements, i.e. heavy metals, in the investigated environment through different tissues and organs.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Based on the official permission of the nature conservation permit of the county government office (No. JN-07/61/00253-4/2020), 20 cormorants were shot in the Central Tisza area (on the river section below the dam near Kisköre) in January of 2020 (Decree No. 13/2001 2001), under the supervision of the Nature Conservation Service, due to population management activity to reduce the numbers of cormorants in the region (Fig. 1). Cormorants are non-protected species, which can cause economic losses in the fishery industry.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Sampling area

During the pathological investigation of the age and gender of animals, fish species found in the stomach were investigated and analysed by specialist.

Samples from 20 cormorants of both genders (10 males, 10 females) were taken from feather, liver, kidneys and bones. All samples of liver and kidney (20 g in all cases) and the upper third part of the femur were loaded into individually labelled plastic bags and then all organs of each bird were placed in a common bag. After that, all samples were transported to the laboratory sites in cooler circumstances. They were frozen at −20 °C until analysis. In the case of feathers a mixed sample of primaries, secondaries, and coverts from breast an amount of 5 g was collected by plucking and placed into individually labelled paper bags, and they were stored in a dry, well-ventilated place till the analysis. In all cases a representative sample was taken from them to collect the quantity required for analytical measurement (0.5 g).

Method

Laboratory processing and measurements

The potentially toxic element concentration of the samples was determined in the analytical laboratory of the Department of Animal Hygiene, University of Veterinary Medicine using a Perkin Elmer Optima 3300 DV inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) as described by Grúz et al. (2018). During the analysis, the following measurement parameters were applied: RF generator: 40 MHz, RF power: 1500 W, nebulizer type: concentric (Meinhard Type A), nebulizer gas flow rate: 0.9 dm3/min, cooling water flow rate: 1 dm3/min, sheath gas flow rate: 0.9 dm3/min, sample feeding flow rate: 0.9 cm3/min, and observation height: 15 mm. The detected wavelengths of each element are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Results of validation

Element Wavelength of detection (nm) Calibration curve parameters Limit of quantitation (ppm) Limit of detection (ppm) Precision (%) Trueness (%)
Equation (y = a·x + b) (1) (2)
a b r
Arsenic 197.197 1287 0 0.999828 1.67 0.50 12.7 13.6
Cadmium 228.802 63,870 0 0.999529 0.17 0.05 8.4 −10.9
Mercury 253.652 10,030 0 1.000000 1.67 0.50 12.3 8.1
Lead 220.353 6520 0 0.999813 0.67 0.20 3.5 −8.4

(1) “y” means the signal of the target element at the given concentration level; “x” means the concentration

(2) Regression coefficient

Analytical standards used in sample processing

Calibration was performed with ICP multi- and mono-element standards (Perkin Elmer Inc., USA; VWR International Ltd., England). The measurements were performed with argon gas of 4.6 purity (Messer Hungarogáz Kft). Quality control (QC) standards were prepared from standard bovine liver reference material NIST SRM 1577c (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

Sample preparation

The feathers were washed in deionised water and ethanol (50 v/v%), to remove adherent exogenous contamination before the analytical procedure. The bones were cleaned from muscle and tendon, and they were broken to sample the required amount for the analytical procedure. After the homogenisation of the tissues, 0.5 g of each sample was weighted into a CEM MARS6 MARSXPreSS teflon vessel for sample digestion. Then they were decomposed by 5 mL nitric acid (69 m/m%) and 5 mL hydrogen peroxide (30 m/m%) in a microwave digestion system (ramp: 35 min; temperature: 200 °C; hold: 50 min; E: 1700 W). The sample was filled up with ultrapure water to 25 mL and analysed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) after a double dilution of deionised water using 1 mg/L Y solution as internal standard and 0.25 mg/L Au for the stabilisation of Hg content.

Blank and the quality control (QC) samples were prepared by the same method. Internal quality control of the measurements was carried out via measuring QC samples of known heavy metal concentration at least 10 times (NIST 1577C-standard bovine liver). After discarding the extremes, the standard deviation of data (SD) was established, which must have remained within the ±15% of the nominal concentration value in order to accept the QC measurement. Every sample, calibration and blank solutions were analysed by 3 replicates.

Validation of the analytical method

For assessing the reliability of the analytical method and sample preparation, several validation parameters were established according to the relevant guidelines (Commission Decision 2002). Limits of detection (LOD or decision limit, CCα) and limits of quantitation (LOQ or detection capability, CCβ) were defined as three and 10 times the standard deviation of the signals of the blank samples, respectively. Precision was determined as the relative standard deviation of the signals from 10 replicates of the same sample. Trueness was determined by analysing certified reference material (standard bovine liver NIST SRM 1577c) then adding the solution of the four target elements with known concentration (50 μg/kg each) to the same certified reference material as well as comparing and evaluating the analysis results. Both precision and trueness were expressed in percentages. Precision values were accepted below 20%; trueness was accepted in the deviation of the measured parameter that did not exceed ±15%. Linearity was evaluated by the equations of the calibration curves. Matrix effect was not studied since the yttrium solution used as internal standard provided compensation.

The certified Cd content of the reference sample was above the LOD of the method; thus, it was measured directly. The standard deviation and the recovery values are presented (Table 2). The certified values of As, Hg, and Pb were below the relevant LODs; therefore, these parameters were checked by spiking the QC samples to contain additional 0.05 mg/L from the elements (this value is equal to 5.0 ppm calculated in the original sample). The same internal standard was used every time. As the recoveries of all measured elements were within the acceptable range, we classified our sample preparation method overall acceptable. However, we checked the measurement reliability of these elements from another point of view as well. The “percentage of the spiked QC sample” was calculated by dividing the measured spiked sample results by the theoretical results (certified value + 5.0 ppm) and multiply by 100. Spiked QC samples were subjected to the same sample preparation process as all the other samples. In our opinion, this percentage can be used to demonstrate the trueness of method for these elements if we consider trueness as set in the 2002/657/EC Commission Decision.

Table 2.

Results of quality control (QC) measurement (ppm)

Element Certified value Measured value Spiked QC samples LOD Measured/calculated value Recovery (%)
Arsenic 0.019 n.d. 76.098 ± 0.018 0.500 0.0197 103.5
Cadmium 0.097 0.095 ± 0.006 - 0.050 0.0953 98.3
Mercury 0.005 n.d. 75.875 ± 0.020 0.500 0.0053 106.7
Lead 0.063 n.d. 79.576 ± 0.020 0.200 0.0637 101.1

n.d. = not detectable

During the analysis the following potentially toxic elements were analysed in all samples like arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb). Their limit of detection (LOD) was 0.05 ppm for Cd, 0.2 ppm for Pb, and 0.5 ppm for As and Hg.

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (R Core Team 2021).

Samples in which the concentration was below the LOD were calculated as LOD values. The concentrations of As in liver, kidneys, and bones, and that of Hg and Pb in bones, were below the LOD in all samples; therefore, they were not analysed statistically.

Distribution of concentrations was examined with boxplot charts. Independent sample t-test was used to compare sexes if normality assumptions were met; otherwise, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was applied. Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple tests.

Since statistical difference was not found between the sexes, observations from different sexes were pooled for further analyses. Different tissues were compared using repeated measures ANOVA if its assumptions were met, and the Friedman test was employed otherwise. Normality was checked using boxplots, whilst sphericity using Mauchly’s test. If only normality was met, and sphericity was violated Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied. The p-values were Bonferroni corrected for multiple tests. In the case of significant difference, paired sample t-test or nonparametric Wilcoxon test was done with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.

Results

Evaluation of metal concentrations

The concentrations of elements in various types of feathers are different; however, the potential metal contamination of the whole body has been evaluated in this study using different types of feathers taken from several parts of the body, and together with the possible contamination of the environment.

Concentration of As was below detection limit in all samples taken from bones, kidneys, and liver. It was typically above detection limit only in feather samples. Concentration of Cd was above detection limit in all samples except 5% of liver samples. Concentration of Hg was below detection limit in all bone samples and in all other samples as well. Concentration of Pb was below detection limit in all bone samples, 40% of kidney samples, and 45% liver samples.

Mean and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) values can be found in Table 3, where the sexes are pooled.

Table 3.

Average and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of metal concentrations measured in liver, kidney, bones, and feathers (unit: ppm)

Liver Kidney Bone Feathers
As Cd Hg Pb As Cd Hg Pb As Cd Hg Pb As Cd Hg Pb
n 20 20 20 20
Average <0.5 0.129 3.428 0.530 <0.5 0.351 2.926 0.850 <0.5 0.237 <0.5 <0.2 1.222 0.096 4.793 1.721
95% CI - 0.032 0.705 0.289 - 0.124 0.725 0.449 - 0.021 - - 0.168 0.020 0.941 0.539
LOD (ppm) 0.5 0.05 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.05 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.05 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.05 0.5 0.2
Ratio below LOD (%) 100 5 0 45 100 0 0 40 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0

n = number of samples

Comparison of sexes

Since the distribution of the As concentrations was either highly skewed or constant for bone, kidney, and liver samples, so was that of Hg for bone sample and that of Pb for bone, kidney, and liver samples, the comparison was carried out using Mann-Whitney test in these cases. In other cases, where the distributions were close to normal, the comparison was carried out by using t-test. There was no significant difference between the sexes at either metal-tissue pair. Therefore, data from different sexes were pooled for further analysis.

Comparison of the tissue samples

The comparison of the tissues for As and Pb was carried out by using Friedman test since the distributions were highly skewed or constant (Fig. 2). In case of Hg the constant bone samples were omitted from the omnibus test. Mauchly’s test indicated that the assumption of sphericity was violated for both Cd (W = 0.021, p = 2e−13) and Hg (W = 0.138, p = 2e−8), so Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied to the degrees of freedom to get valid p-values.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Concentrations for each element-tissue combination. Observations of two sexes are pooled. Individual observations are superposed on boxplots with red symbols. Subplots containing only values below detection limits have been greyed out and denoted with BDL (all samples below detection limit). Letters in parenthesis present the results of pairwise comparisons. Tissues having a common letter do not differ significantly from each other. Tissues having only different letters are significantly different

Difference of the concentration amongst the different tissues was found to be significant for each element. It suggests that every element accumulates in various concentrations in several organs and tissues. Results of the pairwise comparisons can be seen in Fig. 2.

Discussion

Arsenic

It is not generally accepted as essential element, but there is evidence that As has an essential and beneficial function. Its elemental form and organic compounds are not toxic, and the acute toxicity of its inorganic compounds is also greatly influenced by chemical structure (Thomas et al. 2001; Laczay 2013; Hu et al. 2020), although in minimal amounts (0.012–0.025 mg/day) it is essential for the body (Sugár and Tóth 2010). Also, Nielsen (1998) suggests that for chicks a determined amount of As is required (12–50-μg/kg diet). Due to the antibiotic and anticoccidial properties of some organic arsenicals, they were used as growth promoters in poultry (Anderson 1983). Czarnecki and Baker (1985) determined that 100-ppm diet as sodium arsenite generates copper accumulation in the kidneys of chicks (100-mg roxarsone/kg diet).

When excessive amounts are ingested, the highest amount of arsenic can be measured in liver and kidneys. Due to the affinity of arsenite to bind sulfhydryl groups in the body (e.g. keratin), high amounts can be accumulated in skin, hair, and nails. García-Cegarra and Martínez-López (2023) measured 0.87 ± 0.12 ppm As in the feather samples of red-legged cormorants (Phalacrocorax gaimardi) in Chile. In a study of Einoder et al. (2018), 1.2 ± 0.8 ppm As was detected in black-faced cormorant (Phalacrocorax fuscescens) feathers. There are few similar studies using wetland birds’ feather to measure the amount of As, which makes it difficult to determine whether the concentrations presented in this study may have caused any effects. In our tissue samples arsenic was only detectable in the feather samples of the cormorants, but only at very low amount (1.222 ppm), its level was below LOD (0.50 ppm) in liver, kidneys, and bones.

Cadmium

Cd is non-essential and accumulates in the food net. It can induce damages of different tissue and behavioural problems (Burger and Gochfeld 2000b; Butt et al. 2018). Cadmium after absorption and distribution can be incorporated into zinc-containing proteins resulting in severe damages (Tang et al. 2014).

In birds, 3 ppm is the accepted threshold for Cd in the liver (Scheuhammer 1987; Nighat et al. 2013). However, its concentration close or above to 3 ppm testifies to heavy contamination of the environment. Based on findings derived from other investigations in birds of prey, the adverse effects are as follows: reduced growth rate has been observed in the range of 0.1 to 2 ppm (Spahn and Sherry 1999; Burger 1993; Naccari et al. 2009). Cd is not transferred to eggs efficiently, so its level in egg is much lower than those found in the diet of hens. For example, the Cd level was undetectable in the albumen and 0.1 ppm in egg yolks collected from hens with 100 ppm Cd in liver (Leach Jr et al. 1979; Sato et al. 1997).

When Cd accumulates in bones, it causes different osteodiseases. Even a low level of exposure may promote skeletal demineralisation, which leads to bone fragility and risk of fractures (Bhattacharyya et al. 1988; Silver and Nudds 1995; Scheuhammer 1996; D’Haese et al. 2017; Järup 2002; McFarland et al. 2002). Because Cd has about a 20-year biological half-life, different pathological conditions have been diagnosed in avian species. During the time of exposure, the tissue levels reach a plateau, which occurs rapidly in muscles (within months), but in liver and kidneys for a much longer period. When the exposure ceases, the reduction of Cd from tissues is not too significant, even if the muscles and bones do not accumulate cadmium at high levels (White and Finley 1978; Sharma et al. 1979; Baxter et al. 1982).

Studies in Japan show similarity to our measured data in the liver, where cormorants from the vicinity of Tokyo accumulated 0.28 ppm Cd, and from the region of Lake Biwa 1.25 ppm (Saeki et al. 2000).

In the feathers of red-legged cormorants García-Cegarra and Martínez-López (2023) detected average concentration of Cd as 1.49 ± 0.36 ppm. In black-faced cormorant feathers, this concentration was 1.7 ± 1.2 ppm (Einoder et al. 2018). Mirsanjari et al. (2014) measured 0.02 ± 0.02 ppm in feathers of great cormorant in Iran. Compared to our results there is a higher concentration of Cd in kidney (18.56 ± 2.46 ppm) and in the liver (4.13 ± 0.59 ppm) in yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis) (Vizuete et al. 2022).

In our study the highest mean Cd level (0.351 ppm) was detected in the kidneys of cormorants, followed by the bones (0.237 ppm), liver (0.129 ppm), and feather (0.096 ppm), which correlates to the findings of other studies that Cd accumulation is the greatest in kidneys amongst the organs (NRC 2005). Cd concentrations in kidneys and bones were significantly higher than in liver and feather, whilst the bones vs kidneys and feather vs liver concentrations were not significantly different from each other.

Lead

Lead is a non-essential element and has various adverse effects on the CNS, renal, hematopoietic, neurologic, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems (Charkiewicz and Backstrand 2020). It can cause liver, skin, and lung cancer; changes haematological parameters; can also cause cerebral oedema, neuronal damage, demyelination, anaemia, and bone marrow suppression; and decreased peripheral nerve conduction peripherally. Significant suppression of growth can be caused by 1 ppm Pb in the diet (Bakalli et al. 1995). Also, behavioural changes occur (such as screaming), because the bird is in pain or otherwise uncomfortable (Bakalli et al. 1995). By experience it has been found that 4 ppm Pb in feather can induce delayed parental, locomotor, and feeding behaviour of seagulls (Burger 1995) and more adverse effects of lead can occur above 4 ppm (Burger and Gochfeld 2000c) whilst 2 ppm Pb in liver and 10–20 ppm (d.w.) in bones results in subclinical poisoning (Pain et al. 1995, 2005).

Lead is retained by soft tissues and eventually by bone and the excretion is very slow through the kidneys (Rădulescu and Lundgren 2019). In the body of the animals Pb levels in bones are the highest, followed by kidneys and liver. Lower Pb concentration is detected in skeletal muscle.

In great cormorants’ feathers the average concentration of lead was 0.67 ± 0.24 ppm in the study of Mirsanjari et al. (2014). Higher concentration was detected by García-Cegarra and Martínez-López (2023) 2.82 ± 0.96 ppm in red-legged cormorants’ feathers, and by Irena et al. (2017) in the feather samples of great cormorants (2.18 ± 0.74 ppm), and an even higher one in black-faced cormorant feathers, 10.6 ± 5.9 ppm (Einoder et al. 2018). In liver samples of great cormorants collected at a nature conservation area of Kis-Balaton, the Pb concentration was 0.670 ± 0.221 ppm (Lehel et al. 2013), which is similar to our results.

Compared to our data, Agusa et al. (2005) detected lower lead concentration in the liver and the kidneys of black-tailed gulls (0.05 ppm and 0.25 ppm).

Similar findings to ours have been observed in a study from Spain by Vizuete et al. (2022), where they measured higher concentration of Pb in kidneys (2.50 ± 0.78 ppm) than in liver (0.55 ± 0.77 ppm) in samples from yellow-legged gulls; 4.38 ± 1.09 ppm in the feathers of yellow-legged gulls was detected, and it is also a higher level compared to the 0.83 ± 0.37 ppm in the same species (Otero et al. 2018), or the 0.399 ± 0.048 ppm in Northern gannet (Morus bassanus) (Nardiello et al. 2019). Vizuete et al. (2019) and Nardiello et al. (2019) stated that Pb values are higher in the kidney compared to liver and feathers (in yellow-legged gulls and in northern gannet), which is contradictory to our findings.

Our results as opposed to the abovementioned literature data showed the highest mean concentration in the feather (1.721 ppm), followed by kidneys (0.850 ppm), liver (0.530 ppm), and in bones the concentration in all samples was below the detection limit. The feather vs liver, feather, and kidney concentrations were significantly different. But all the measured Pb levels in these tissues are below the abovementioned thresholds.

Mercury

Mercury is a non-essential heavy metal, one of the most toxic and persistent heavy metals in the aquatic ecosystem (Nguyen et al. 2005). In the environment, some mercury is transformed to methylmercury, which is more toxic, by bacteria and fungi during various biological processes (Wood and Wang 1983). This reaction occurs primarily in aquatic systems (Gworek et al. 2020). Thus, methylmercury of microbial origin is able to enter the food chain and accumulate in animals; it is highly toxic and persistent, which can cause problems in the food web (Bloom 1992; Nguyen et al. 2005; Rodríguez-Estival et al. 2020). During long-term administration, young chickens tolerated 1.35 ppm of mercury without growth problems (March et al. 1983), but 5 ppm had already increased their mortality; in ducks 3.8 ppm caused behavioural changes (Soares Jr et al. 1973; Bhatnagar et al. 1982).

The majority of mercury load (70–93%) in the body of birds can be accumulated in feathers (Braune and Gaskin 1987; Burger and Gochfeld 1997; Bond and Diamond 2009), because of the keratin content of the feathers, as methylmercury has a high affinity for sulfhydryl groups. According to the literature, Hg binds to the matrix of the feathers, cannot be mobilised and dissolved from it, so the only route of mercury excretion is moulting (Goede and de Bruin 1984; Burger 1993; Dauwe et al. 2002).

Burger and Gochfeld (2001) observed very low level of Hg (0.251 ppm) in the feather of Cape Cormorant (Phalacrocorax capensis) from Namibia. García-Cegarra and Martínez-López (2023) detected a similar low concentration in the feathers of red-legged cormorants (0.66 ± 0.04 ppm). Misztal-Szkudlińska et al. (2010) analysed great cormorants’ feathers, where the total Hg concentrations in contour feathers were 9.73 ± 5.63 ppm, whilst in tail feathers were 6.43 ± 4.21 ppm. Furtado et al. studied imperial cormorant (Leucocarbo atriceps) and their feather samples showed 2.69 ± 0.77 ppm concentration of Hg. Higher concentration was detected in great cormorants (13.14 ± 4.89 ppm) by Irena et al. (2017) and in black-faced cormorants (19.3 ± 6.9 ppm) by Einoder et al. (2018).

In yellow-legged gulls the Hg concentrations of kidney (2.94 ± 0.18 ppm) and liver (2.95 ± 0.21 ppm) levels of Hg were similar, but in the feathers the highest metal concentration was Pb (4.38 ± 1.09 ppm), not Hg (1.13 ± 0.08 ppm), compared to the present study (Vizuete et al. 2022).

In a study on great cormorant tissue samples show higher concentrations in kidney (3.79 ± 0.71 ppm) and in liver (5.71 ± 1.85 ppm) (Aazami 2018). Similarly, to our data, in the liver and kidney samples of great cormorants 3.4 ± 1.1 ppm and 2.5 ± 2.2 ppm Hg were measured by Nam et al. (2005). Skoric et al. (2012) studied the bones of great cormorants and measured 1.04 ± 0.22 ppm of Hg in adult birds.

In a previous study on great cormorants from Hungary at a nature conservation area of Kis-Balaton, Hg concentration in liver samples of adult birds was 4.479 ± 3.336 ppm (Lehel et al. 2013).

In the present study, mostly lower concentration was detected than in the above-mentioned sources. The highest mean Hg levels were in the feathers (4.793 ppm), followed by liver (3.428 ppm) and kidneys (2.926 ppm), and in bones were below LOD. The concentration in feathers is significantly higher than in the bones, liver, and kidneys.

In our study the detected concentrations match well with the MTL (Maximum Tolerable Level) data of these elements (Table 4) (NRC 2005). Our results show that the investigated area is not contaminated with potentially toxic elements to such an extent that could lead to chronic exposure or could even adversely affect the growth, reproduction, or behaviour of cormorants.

Table 4.

Comparison of potentially toxic elements in feather, liver, kidney, and bone tissue samples (average, ppm) and MTL values (ppm feed)

Element Liver Kidney Bone Feather MTL value
Arsenic <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.222 30
Cadmium 0.129 0.351 0.237 0.096 10
Lead 0.530 0.850 <0.20 1.721 10
Mercury 3.428 2.926 <0.50 4.793 5.0

Conclusion

The burden of potentially toxic elements in the organs and tissues of birds is mostly influenced by various factors, as the accessibility of these elements, the quality of their food, and the metal burden in their nesting and feeding area. Based on our results the measured quantities of the examined elements stored in the liver, kidneys, bones, and feather samples of great cormorants do not exceed levels indicative of poisoning, even if the most exposed birds are the ones at the top of the food net, such as cormorants, and show that the tested area is not contaminated at a level that can cause adverse effects or poisoning in birds. In addition, it points out that these elements are presented in the environment and should be regularly monitored to be able to detect and analyse their increase of these to avoid possible pollution/poisoning in the future.

Supplementary information

ESM 1 (14.3KB, docx)

(DOCX 14 kb)

Author contributions

Conceptualisation: József Lehel and Péter Budai; methodology: András Bartha; sample collection, formal analysis, and investigation: Tibor Kocsner, László Menyhárt, Rita Szabó; writing — original draft: Adrienn Grúz; writing — review and editing: József Lehel, Péter Budai.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences. Open access funding provided by the University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest. Project no. RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00001 has been implemented with the support provided by the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), financed under the National Recovery Fund budget estimate, RRF-2.3.1-21 funding scheme.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study and the supplementary materials are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Consent for publication

All the authors have approved the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Aazami J, Kiani Mehr N. Survey of heavy metals in internal tissues of great cormorant collected from southern wetlands of Caspian Sea, Iran. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190:52. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6433-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbasi NA, Jaspers VLB, Chaudhry MJI, Ali S, Malik RN. Influence of taxa, trophic level, and location on bioaccumulation of toxic metals in bird’s feathers: a preliminary biomonitoring study using multiple bird species from Pakistan. Chemosphere. 2015;120:527–537. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.08.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agusa T, Matsumoto T, Ikemoto T, Anan Y, Kubota R, Yasunaga G, Kunito T, Tanabe S, Ogi H, Shibata Y. Body distribution of trace elements in black-tailed gulls from Rishiri Island, Japan: age-dependent accumulation and transfer to feathers and eggs. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005;24:2107. doi: 10.1897/04-617r.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Yousuf MH, El-Shahawi MS, Al-Ghais SM. Trace metals in liver, skin and muscle of Lethrinus lentjan fish species in relation to body length and sex. Sci Total Environ. 2000;256:87. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00363-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues. (1998) Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) Oslo, Norway. ISBN 82-7655-061-4
  6. Anderson CE. Arsenicals as feed additives for poultry and swine. In: Lederer WH, Fensterheim RJ, editors. Arsenic: Industrial., Biomedical., Environmental Perspectives. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1983. pp. 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakalli RI, Pesti GM, Ragland WL. The magnitude of lead toxicity in broiler chickens. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1995;37(1):15–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barjaktarovic L, Elliot JE, Scheuhammer AM. Metal and metallothionein concentration in scoter (Melanitta spp.) from the Pacific Northwest of Canada, 1989–1994. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002;43:486–491. doi: 10.1007/s00244-002-1273-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baxter JC, Barry B, Johnson DE, Klienholz EW. Heavy metal retention in cattle tissues from infestation of sewage sludge. J Environ Qual. 1982;11:616–620. doi: 10.2134/jeq1982.00472425001100040012x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhatnagar MK, Vrablic OE, Yamashiro S. Ultrastructural alterations of the liver of pekin ducks fed methyl mercury-containing diets. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1982;10:981–1003. doi: 10.1080/15287398209530311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhattacharyya MH, Whelton BD, Stern PH, Peterson DP. Cadmium accelerates bone loss in ovariectomized mice and fetal rat limb bones in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:8761–8765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloom NS. On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1992;49:1010–1017. doi: 10.1139/f92-113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bond AL, Diamond AW. Total and methyl mercury concentrations in seabird feathers and eggs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;56(2):286–291. doi: 10.1007/s00244-008-9185-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brandão-Neto J, Stefan V, Mendonca BB, Bloise W, Castro AV. The essential role of zinc in growth. Nutr Res. 1995;1:335–358. doi: 10.1016/0271-5317(95)00003-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Braune BM, Gaskin DE. A mercury budget for the Bonaparte’s gull during autumn moult. Ornis Scand. 1987;18:244–250. doi: 10.2307/3676891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Burger J. Metals in avian feathers: bioindicators of environmental pollution. Rev Environ Toxicol. 1993;5:203–311. [Google Scholar]
  17. Burger J. A risk assessment for lead in birds. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995;45:369–396. doi: 10.1080/15287399509532003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Risk, mercury levels, and birds: relating adverse laboratory effects to field biomonitoring. Environ Res. 1997;75:160–172. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Metal levels in feathers of 12 species of seabirds from Midway Atoll in the northern Pacific Ocean. Sci Total Environ. 2000;257:37–52. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00496-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Metals in albatross feathers from Midway Atoll: influence of species, age, and nest location. Environ Res. 2000;82:207–221. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1999.4015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Effects of lead on birds (Laridae): a review of laboratory and field studies. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B: Crit Rev. 2000;3:59–78. doi: 10.1080/109374000281096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Metal levels in feathers of cormorants, flamingos and gulls from the coast of Namibia in Southern Africa. Environ Monit Assess. 2001;69:195–203. doi: 10.1023/A:1010710108434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Habitat, population dynamics, and metal levels in colonial waterbirds: a food chain approach. CRC Press; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  24. Butt SL, Saleemi MK, Khan MZ, Khan A, Rackensperger T. Cadmium toxicity in female Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) and its diminution with silymarin. Pak Vet J. 2018;38:2074–7764. doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2018.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Canli M, Atli G. The relationships between heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) levels and the size of six Mediterranean fish species. Environ Pollut. 2003;121:129. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00194-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Canova L, Sturini M, Profumo A, Maraschi F. Evidence of low-habitat contamination using feathers of three heron species as a biomonitor of inorganic elemental pollution. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Catsiki VA, Bel F, Nicolaidou A. Size dependent metal concentrations in two marine gastropod species. Neth J Aquat Ecol. 1994;28:157. doi: 10.1007/bf02333986. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Charkiewicz AE, Backstrand JR. Lead toxicity and pollution in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):4385. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen C, Han X, Wang G, Liu D, Bao L, Jiao C, Luan J, Hou Y, Xu Y, Wang H, Zhang Q, Zhou H, Fu J, Pi J. Nrf2 deficiency aggravates the kidney injury induced by subacute cadmium exposure in mice. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95:883–893. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02964-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Commission Decision (2002) No. 2002/657/EC of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results, L 221/45. Off J Eur Union
  31. Czarnecki GL, Baker DH. Reduction in liver copper concentration by the organic arsenical, 3-nitro-4-hyrdroxyphenylarsonic acid. J Anim Sci. 1985;60:440–450. doi: 10.2527/jas1985.602440x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dauwe T, Lieven B, Ellen J, Rianne P, Ronny B, Marcel E. Great and blue tit feathers as biomonitors for heavy metal pollution. Ecol Indic. 2002;1(4):227–234. doi: 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00008-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Decree No. 13/2001 . Decree of the Minister of Environment No. 13/2001 (KöM) on the protected and strictly protected plant and animal species, strictly protected caves as well as on the plant and animal species of community importance. Budapest, Hungary: Ministry of Environment; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  34. D’Haese PC, Couttenye MM, Lamberts LV, Elseviers MM, Goodman WG, Schrooten I, Egwumah FA, Egwumah PO, Edet DI (2017) Paramount roles of wild birds as bioindicators of contamination. Int J Avian & Wildlife Biol 2(6):00041. https://medcraveonline.com/IJAWB/paramount-roles-of-wild-birds-as-bioindicators-of-contamination.html
  35. Einoder LD, MacLeod CK, Coughanowr C. Metal and isotope analysis of bird feathers in a contaminated estuary reveals bioaccumulation, biomagnification and potential toxic effects. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018;75(1):96–110. doi: 10.1007/s00244-018-0532-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ethier ALM, Braune BM, Scheuhammer AM, Bond DE. Comparison of lead residues among avian bones. Environ Pollut. 2007;145:915–919. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Frederick PC, Spalding MG, Sepälveda MS, Williams GE, Nico L, Robins R. Exposure of great egret (Ardea albus) nestlings to mercury through diet in the Everglades ecosystem. Environ Toxicol Chem An Int J. 1999;18:1940–1947. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018&#x0003c;1940:eogeaa&#x0003e;2.3.co;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. García-Cegarra AM, Martínez-López E. Metal concentrations in feathers of red-legged cormorants (Phalacrocorax gaimardi) and sources of plastic in a nesting colony from northern Chile. Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;190:114817. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Goede AA, de Bruin M. The use of bird feather part as a monitor for metal pollution. Environ Pollut. 1984;8:281–298. doi: 10.1016/0143-148x(84)90028-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Grúz A, Déri J, Szemerédy G, Szabó K, Kormos É, Bartha A, Lehel J, Budai P. Monitoring of heavy metal burden in wild birds at eastern/north-eastern part of Hungary. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:6378–6386. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Grúz A, Mackle O, Bartha A, Szabó R, Déri J, Budai P, Lehel J. Biomonitoring of toxic metals in feathers of predatory birds from Eastern Regions of Hungary. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:26324–26331. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05723-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Grúz A, Szemerédy G, Kormos É, Budai P, Sz M, Tompai E, Lehel J. Monitoring of heavy metal burden in Mute swan (Cygnus olor) Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:15903–15909. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4809-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gworek B, Dmuchowski W, Baczewska-Dąbrowska AH. Mercury in the terrestrial environment: a review. Environ Sci Eur. 2020;32(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12302-020-00401-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hamza A, Hisham AS, Suratman S, Bidai JA, Shazili NAM. Trace elements in feathers and eggshells of two tropical seabirds from Malaysia. Mar Ornithol. 2021;49:335–341. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hazrat A, Ezzat K, Ikram I. Environmental chemistry and ecotoxicology of hazardous heavy metals: environmental persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation. J Chem. 2019;2019(4):1–14. doi: 10.1155/2019/6730305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Honda K, Min BY, Ratsukawa R. Heavy metal distribution in organs and tissues of the eastern great white egret Egretta alba modesta. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1985;35:781–789. doi: 10.1007/BF01636588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hu Y, Li J, Lou B, Wu R, Wang G, Lu C, Wang H, Pi J, Xu Y. The role of reactive oxygen species in arsenic toxicity. Biomolecules. 2020;10(2):240. doi: 10.3390/biom10020240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hutton M. Accumulation of heavy metals and selenium in three sea birds species from the United Kingdom. Environ Pollut Ser A. 1981;26:129–145. doi: 10.1016/0143-1471(81)90043-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Irena H, Katarina J, Branko K, Stefan S. Allocation of metals and trace elements in different tissues of piscivorous species Phalacrocorax carbo. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017;73(4):533–541. doi: 10.1007/s00244-017-0452-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Järup L. Cadmium overload and toxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(2):35–39. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.suppl_2.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kalisinska E. Lead and other heavy metals in the brain of geese hunted in the vicinity of Slonsk, Poland. Biol Bull Poznan. 2000;37:273–286. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim JH, Park GH, Han GP, Choi HS, Ji SY, Kil DY. Prediction of lead intake and tissue lead concentrations in broiler chickens using feather lead concentrations. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;193:517–523. doi: 10.1007/s12011-019-01726-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. King J, Shames DM, Woodhouse LR (2000) Zinc homeostasis in humans. J Nutr:1360S–6S. 10.1093/jn/130.5.1360s [DOI] [PubMed]
  54. Laczay P. Élelmiszer higiénia, élelmiszerlánc-biztonság. Budapest: Mezőgazda Kiadó; 2013. pp. 82–94. [Google Scholar]
  55. Leach RM, Jr, Wang KW, Baker DE. Cadmium and the food chain: the effect of dietary cadmium on tissue composition in chicks and laying hens. J Nutr. 1979;109:437–443. doi: 10.1093/jn/109.3.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lehel J, Gál J, Faragó S, Berta E, Andrásofszky E, Fekete SG, Mándoki M, Budai P, Kormos E, Marosán M. Evaluation of mercury and lead content in the liver of the cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis) population of Kis-Balaton, Hungary. Acta Vet Hung. 2013;61(2):187–196. doi: 10.1556/AVet.2013.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lehel J, Laczay P. Toxikológia (Az ökotoxikológus MSc szak hallgatói számára) (in Hungarian) Budapest: Szent István Egyetemi Kiadó; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  58. March BE, Poon R, Chu S. The dynamics of ingested methyl mercury in growing and laying chickens. Poult Sci. 1983;62:1000–1009. doi: 10.3382/ps.0621000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Markowski M, Kaliński A, Skwarska J, Wawrzyniak J, Bańbura M, Markowski J, Zieliński P, Bańbura J. Avian feathers as bioindicators of the exposure to heavy metal contamination of food. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;91(3):302–305. doi: 10.1007/s00128-013-1065-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. McFarland CN, Bendell-Young LI, Guglielmo C, Williams TD. Kidney, liver and bone cadmium content in the western sandpiper in relation to migration. J Environ Monit. 2002;4:791–795. doi: 10.1039/b206045k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mirsanjari MM, Sheybanifar F, Arjmand F. The study of Forest Hara Biosphere Reserve in coast of Persian Gulf and the importance of heavy metal accumulation; Case study: feathers of great cormorant. Nusantara Biosci. 2014;6(2):159–164. doi: 10.13057/nusbiosci/n060209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Misztal-Szkudlińska M, Konieczka P, Namieśnik J, Szefer P (2010) Mercury levels in great cormorant’s feathers from the Vistula Lagoon ecosystem in Poland. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment. pp 615-617.
  63. Mukhtar H, Chan C-Y, Lin Y-P. Lin C-M (2020) Assessing the association and predictability of heavy metals in avian organs, feathers, and bones using crowdsourced samples. Chemosphere. 2020;252:126583. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Myklebust I, Pedersen HC. Accumulation and distribution of cadmium in willow ptarmigan. Ecotoxicology. 1999;8:457–465. doi: 10.1023/A:1008912003597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Naccari C, Cristani M, Cimino F, Arcoraci T, Trombetta D. Common buzzards (Buteo buteo) bio-indicators of heavy metals pollution in Sicily (Italy) Environ Int. 2009;35(3):594–598. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Nam DH, Anan Y, Ikemoto T, Okabe Y, Kim EY, Subramanian A, Saeki K, Tanabe S. Specific accumulation of 20 trace elements in great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) from Japan. Environ Pollut. 2005;134(3):503–514. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Nardiello V, Fidalgo LE, López-Beceiro A, Bertero A, Martínez-Morcillo S, Míguez MP, Soler F, Caloni F, Pérez-López M. Metal content in the liver, kidney, and feathers of Northern gannets, Morus bassanus, sampled on the Spanish coast. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26:19646–19654. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05356-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nguyen HL, Leermakers M, Kurunczi S, Bozo L, Baeyens W. Mercury distribution and speciation in lake Balaton, Hungary. Sci Total Environ. 2005;340:231–246. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Nielsen FH. Ultratrace elements in nutrition: current knowledge and speculation. J Trace Elem Exp Med. 1998;11:251–274. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-670x(1998)11:2/3&#x0003c;251::aid-jtra15&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Nighat S, Iqbal S, Nadeem MS, Mahmood T, Shah SI. Estimation of heavy metal residues from the feathers of Falconidae, Accipitridae, and Strigidae in Punjab, Pakistan. Turk J Zool. 2013;37:488–500. doi: 10.3906/zoo-1112-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. NRC (National Research Council) Mineral tolerance of animals 2nd edition. Washington D.C.: National Academic Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  72. Online reference http1: https://kockazatos.hu/anyag/kadmium, Accessed 12 Sept 2022
  73. Otero XL, de la Peña-Lastra S, Romero D, Nobrega GN, Ferreira TO. Pérez-Alberti A. Trace elements in biomaterials and soils from a yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) colony in the Atlantic Islands of Galicia National Park (NW Spain) Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;133:144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Pain DJ. Lead in waterfowl. Chapter 10. In: Nelson Beyer W, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW, editors. Environmental contaminants in wildlife. Interpreting tissue concentrations. New York: SETAC Special Publications Series. CRC Press; 1996. pp. 251–264. [Google Scholar]
  75. Pain DJ, Meharg AA, Ferrer M, Taggart M, Penteriani V. Lead concentrations in bones and feathers of the globally threatened Spanish imperial eagle. Biol Conserv. 2005;121:603–610. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Pain DJ, Sears J, Newton T. Lead concentrations in birds of prey in Britain. Environ Pollut. 1995;87:173–180. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)p2604-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  78. Rădulescu A, Lundgren S. A pharmacokinetic model of lead absorption and calcium competitive dynamics. Sci Rep. 2019;9:14225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50654-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Roberts H. Food safety. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  80. Rodríguez-Estival J, Ortiz-Santaliestra ME, Mateo R. Assessment of ecotoxicological risks to river otters from ingestion of invasive red swamp crayfish in metal contaminated areas: use of feces to estimate dietary exposure. Environ Res. 2020;181:108907. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Saeki K, Okabe Y, Kim EY, Tanabe S, Fukuda M, Tatsukawa R. Mercury and cadmium in common cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo) Environ Pollut. 2000;108:249–255. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00181-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sánchez J, García F, Planas J. Iron content and distribution in Japanese quail. Q J Exp Physiol. 1987;72:21–29. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1987.sp003052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sato S, Okabe M, Emoto T, Kurasaki M, Kojima Y. Restriction of cadmium transfer to eggs from laying hens exposed to cadmium. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997;51:15–22. doi: 10.1080/00984109708984008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Savinov VM, Gabrielsen GW, Savinova TN. Cadmium, zinc, copper, arsenic, selenium and mercury in seabirds from the Barents Sea: levels, inter-specific and geographical differences. Sci Total Environ. 2003;306:133–158. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00489-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Scheuhammer AM. The chronic toxicity of aluminum, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review. Environ Pollut. 1987;46:263–295. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(87)90173-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Scheuhammer AM. Influence of reduced dietary calcium on the accumulation and effects of lead, cadmium, and aluminum in birds. Environ Pollut. 1996;94:337–343. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(96)00084-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sharma RP, Street JC, Verma MP, Shupe JL. Cadmium uptake from feed and its distribution to food products of livestock. Environ Health Perspect. 1979;28:59–66. doi: 10.1289/ehp.792859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Silver TM, Nudds TD. Influence of low-level cadmium and reduced calcium intake on tissue Cd concentrations and behaviour of American black ducks. Environ Pollut. 1995;90:153–161. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)00102-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Skoric S, Visnjić-Jeftic Z, Jaric I, Djikanovic V, Mickovic B, Nikcevic M, Lenhardt M. Accumulation of 20 elements in great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) and its main prey, common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio) Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012;80:244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Soares JH, Jr, Miller D, Lagally H, Stillings BR, Bauersfeld P, Cuppett S. The comparative effect of oral ingestion of methyl mercury on chicks and rats. Poult Sci. 1973;52:452–458. doi: 10.3382/ps.0520452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Spahn SA, Sherry TW. Cadmium and lead in exposure associated with reduced growth rates, poorer fledging success of Little Blue heron chicks (Egretta caerulea) in South Louisiana wetlands. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1999;37:377–384. doi: 10.1007/s002449900528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Storelli MM, Giacominelli-Stuffler R, Storelli A, Marcotrigiano GO. Accumulation of mercury, cadmium, lead and arsenic in swordfish and bluefin tuna from the Mediterranean Sea: a comparative study. Mar Pollut Bull. 2005;50:993. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Stout JH, Trust KA, Cochrane JF, Suydam RS, Quakenbush LT. Environmental contaminants in four eider species from Alaska and arctic Russia. Environ Pollut. 2002;119:215–226. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00336-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Sugár É, Tóth E (2010) Mérgek királya–királyok mérge” arzénmódosulatok vizsgálata élelmiszerekből HPLC-ICP-MS csatolással. Akadémiai beszámolók, élelmiszerhigiénia 36. p. 8. (in Hungarian)
  95. Swaileh KM, Sansur R. Monitoring urban heavy metal pollution using the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) J Environ Monit. 2006;8:209–213. doi: 10.1039/b510635d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Tang L, Qiu R, Tang Y, Wang S. Cadmium–zinc exchange and their binary relationship in the structure of Zn-related proteins: a mini review. Metallomics. 2014;6:1313–1323. doi: 10.1039/c4mt00080c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Teunen L, Belpaire C, De Boeck G, Blust R, Bervoets L. Mercury accumulation in muscle and liver tissue and human health risk assessment of two resident freshwater fish species in Flanders (Belgium): a multilocation approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:7853–7865. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16215-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Thomas DJ, Styblo M, Lin S. The cellular metabolism and systemic toxicity of arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;176:127–144. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Vizuete J, Hernández-Moreno D, López-Beceiro A, Fidalgo LE, Soler F, Pérez-López M, Míguez-Santiyán MP. Heavy metals and metalloid levels in the tissues of yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis) from Spain: sex, age, and geographical location differences. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:54292–54308. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19627-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Vizuete J, Pérez-López M, Míguez-Santiyán MP, Hernández-Moreno D. Mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), selenium (Se) and arsenic (As) in liver, kidney and feathers of gulls: a review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2019;247:85–146. doi: 10.1007/398_2018_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wapnir RA. Copper absorption and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:1054S–1060S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/67.5.1054s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. White DH, Finley MT. Uptake and retention of dietary cadmium in mallard ducks. Environ Res. 1978;17:53–59. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(78)90060-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wood JM, Wang HK. Microbial resistance to heavy metals. Environ Sci Technol. 1983;17:82–90. doi: 10.1021/es00118a717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (14.3KB, docx)

(DOCX 14 kb)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study and the supplementary materials are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES