Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1991 Apr;26(1):5–26.

Trauma case mix and hospital payment: the potential for refining DRGs.

E J MacKenzie 1, D M Steinwachs 1, A I Ramzy 1, J W Ashworth 3rd 1, B Shankar 1
PMCID: PMC1069808  PMID: 1901840

Abstract

Uniform hospital discharge abstract data from Maryland were used to examine the homogeneity of trauma-related DRGs with respect to a well-established measure of injury severity, the Injury Severity Score (ISS). Thirty DRGs were identified as including trauma cases with a wide range of severity; for each of these DRGs, ISS explains a significant amount of variation in length of stay. By applying statistical techniques similar to those used to create the original DRG groupings, these 30 DRGs were subdivided by severity and age categories to create a new set of severity-modified DRGs. The potential effects of using DRGs and modified DRGs to pay for inpatient care within the Maryland state regionalized system of trauma care were examined. Payments based on regional averages per DRG and per modified DRG were compared to actual hospital charges regulated by the state's Health Services Cost Review Commission. Using average charges per DRG as a basis of payment, approximately !1.4 million (11 percent of total hospital charges) would be shifted from trauma centers to nontrauma centers. This shift represents an 18 percent loss in revenues to trauma centers and a 30 percent gain in revenues to nontrauma centers. Using a payment system based on severity-modified DRGs, trauma centers would still experience a net loss in revenues and the nontrauma centers a net gain, but the total amount of the shift would be reduced from $11.4 million to $9.8 million. The results argue for the need to explore alternative payment systems not strictly based on current DRGs. Because of DRGs do not adequately reflect severity differences, using them to pay hospitals will create financial incentives that discourage regionalization of trauma care.

Full text

PDF
5

Images in this article

17Figure 1
on p.17

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agarwal N., Reyes J. D., Westerman D. A., Cayten C. G. Factors influencing DRG 210 (hip fracture) reimbursement. J Trauma. 1986 May;26(5):426–431. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198605000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aprahamian C., Wolferth C. C., Jr, Darin J. C., McMahon J., Weitzel-DeVeas C. Status of trauma center designation. J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):566–570. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker S. P., O'Neill B., Haddon W., Jr, Long W. B. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker S. P., O'Neill B. The injury severity score: an update. J Trauma. 1976 Nov;16(11):882–885. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197611000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett B. R., Jacobs L. M., Schwartz R. J. Incidence, costs, and DRG-based reimbursement for traumatic brain injured patients: a 3-year experience. J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):556–565. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brook R. H., Lohr K. N. Monitoring quality of care in the Medicare program. Two proposed systems. JAMA. 1987 Dec 4;258(21):3138–3141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cales R. H. Trauma mortality in Orange County: the effect of implementation of a regional trauma system. Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Jan;13(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80375-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cales R. H., Trunkey D. D. Preventable trauma deaths. A review of trauma care systems development. JAMA. 1985 Aug 23;254(8):1059–1063. doi: 10.1001/jama.254.8.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calore K. A., Iezzoni L. Disease staging and PMCs. Can they improve DRGs? Med Care. 1987 Aug;25(8):724–737. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198708000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowley R. A. A total emergency medical system for the State of Maryland. Md State Med J. 1975 Jul;24(7):37–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feder J., Hadley J., Zuckerman S. How did Medicare's prospective payment system affect hospitals? N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 1;317(14):867–873. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710013171405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horn S. D., Sharkey P. D., Chambers A. F., Horn R. A. Severity of illness within DRGs: impact on prospective payment. Am J Public Health. 1985 Oct;75(10):1195–1199. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.10.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobs L. M., Schwartz R. J. The impact of prospective reimbursement on trauma centers. An alternative payment plan. Arch Surg. 1986 Apr;121(4):479–483. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400040117019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobs L. M. The effect of prospective reimbursement on trauma patients. Bull Am Coll Surg. 1985 Feb;70(2):17–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jencks S. F., Dobson A. Refining case-mix adjustment. The research evidence. N Engl J Med. 1987 Sep 10;317(11):679–686. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198709103171106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MacKenzie E. J. Injury severity scales: overview and directions for future research. Am J Emerg Med. 1984 Nov;2(6):537–549. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(84)90081-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MacKenzie E. J., Morris J. A., Jr, Edelstein S. L. Effect of pre-existing disease on length of hospital stay in trauma patients. J Trauma. 1989 Jun;29(6):757–765. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198906000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MacKenzie E. J., Steinwachs D. M., Shankar B. Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses. Validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Med Care. 1989 Apr;27(4):412–422. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198904000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McNeil B. J., Kominski G. F., Williams-Ashman A. Modified DRGs as evidence for variability in patient severity. Med Care. 1988 Jan;26(1):53–61. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198801000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shackford S. R., Hollingworth-Fridlund P., Cooper G. F., Eastman A. B. The effect of regionalization upon the quality of trauma care as assessed by concurrent audit before and after institution of a trauma system: a preliminary report. J Trauma. 1986 Sep;26(9):812–820. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198609000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomas F., Clemmer T. P., Larsen K. G., Menlove R. L., Orme J. F., Jr, Christison E. A. The economic impact of DRG payment policies on air-evacuated trauma patients. J Trauma. 1988 Apr;28(4):446–452. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198804000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Waller J. A., Payne S. R., McClallen J. M. Trauma centers and DRGs--inherent conflict? J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):617–622. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. West J. G., Cales R. H., Gazzaniga A. B. Impact of regionalization. The Orange County experience. Arch Surg. 1983 Jun;118(6):740–744. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390060058013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. West J. G., Williams M. J., Trunkey D. D., Wolferth C. C., Jr Trauma systems. Current status--future challenges. JAMA. 1988 Jun 24;259(24):3597–3600. doi: 10.1001/jama.259.24.3597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES