Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1992 Dec;27(5):651–669.

How the elderly fare in HMOs: outcomes from the Medicare competition demonstrations.

S M Retchin 1, D G Clement 1, L F Rossiter 1, B Brown 1, R Brown 1, L Nelson 1
PMCID: PMC1069904  PMID: 1464538

Abstract

Because of concern about the effects of prepaid care on outcomes for elderly enrollees in health maintenance organizations (HMOs), a prospective study of access to care and functional outcomes was performed. HMOs with Medicare risk contracts in January 1985 (N = 17) were selected from ten communities and were matched for comparison with ten similar communities where no Medicare HMOs were in operation. Random samples of HMO enrollees (N = 2,098) and fee-for-service (FFS) nonenrollees (N = 1,059) were assessed at baseline and at follow-up one year later (HMO = 1,873, FFS = 916) to observe access to care and functional outcomes. At baseline, nonenrollees had more bed days and poorer functional status than HMO enrollees. While fewer HMO enrollees experienced declines in functional status between baseline and follow-up (e.g., patient's ability to function declined in one or more activities of daily living: HMOs at 5.3 percent versus FFS at 8.5 percent, p < .01), after controlling for other factors with logistic regression, enrollment status was not significantly associated with functional decline. Self-rated health, history of hospitalization, age of 80 or older and baseline functional status were predictive of decline in function. After controlling for baseline differences, HMO disenrollees also experienced similar functional declines at follow-up compared to continuously enrolled beneficiaries. These findings suggest that Medicare beneficiaries who belong to HMOs experience comparable rates of functional decline to those experienced by beneficiaries in the FFS sector with similar initial levels of function and health status. Together with results showing no significant difference in medical visits according to various symptoms, we conclude that access and quality of care delivered by HMOs is comparable to that provided in FFS settings.

Full text

PDF
651

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates E. W., Brown B. S. Geriatric care needs and HMO technology. A theoretical analysis and initial findings from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation. Med Care. 1988 May;26(5):488–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gaus C. R., Cooper S., Hirschman C. G. Contrasts in HMO and fee-for-service performance. Soc Secur Bull. 1976 May;39(5):3–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gillick M. R. The impact of health maintenance organizations on geriatric care. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jan;106(1):139–143. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HALDANE J. B. The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Ann Hum Genet. 1956 May;20(4):309–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Iglehart J. K. Second thoughts about HMOs for Medicare patients. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jun 4;316(23):1487–1492. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz S., Heiple K. G., Downs T. D., Ford A. B., Scott C. P. Long term course of 147 patients with fracture of the hip. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 Jun;124(6):1219–1230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Katz S., Vignos P. J., Jr, Moskowitz R. W., Thompson H. M., Svec K. H. Comprehensive outpatient care in rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled study. JAMA. 1968 Nov 4;206(6):1249–1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lubeck D. P., Brown B. W., Holman H. R. Chronic disease and health system performance. Care of osteoarthritis across three health services. Med Care. 1985 Mar;23(3):266–277. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198503000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manning W. G., Leibowitz A., Goldberg G. A., Rogers W. H., Newhouse J. P. A controlled trial of the effect of a prepaid group practice on use of services. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 7;310(23):1505–1510. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198406073102305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Retchin S. M., Brown B. Elderly patients with congestive heart failure under prepaid care. Am J Med. 1991 Feb;90(2):236–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rossiter L. F., Langwell K., Wan T. T., Rivnyak M. Patient satisfaction among elderly enrollees and disenrollees in Medicare health maintenance organizations. Results from the National Medicare Competition Evaluation. JAMA. 1989 Jul 7;262(1):57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rubenstein L. Z., Kane R. L. Geriatric assessment programs. Their time has come. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Sep;33(9):646–647. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb06323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sackett D. L., Gent M. Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 27;301(26):1410–1412. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912273012602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Steel K., Gertman P. M., Crescenzi C., Anderson J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1981 Mar 12;304(11):638–642. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198103123041104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ware J. E., Jr, Brook R. H., Rogers W. H., Keeler E. B., Davies A. R., Sherbourne C. D., Goldberg G. A., Camp P., Newhouse J. P. Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care. Lancet. 1986 May 3;1(8488):1017–1022. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91282-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weil P. A. Comparative costs to the Medicare program of seven prepaid group practices and controls. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976 Summer;54(3):339–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wrightson W., Jr, Genuardi J., Stephens S. Demographic and utilization characteristics of HMO disenrollees. GHAA J. 1987 Summer;8(1):23–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yelin E. H., Shearn M. A., Epstein W. V. Health outcomes for a chronic disease in prepaid group practice and fee for service settings. The case of rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care. 1986 Mar;24(3):236–247. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198603000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES