Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1993 Dec;28(5):577–597.

A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research.

S A Finkler 1, J R Knickman 1, G Hendrickson 1, M Lipkin Jr 1, W G Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1069965  PMID: 8270422

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. This study compares results and illustrates trade-offs between work-sampling and time-and-motion methodologies. DATA SOURCES. Data are from time-and-motion measurements of a sample of medical residents in two large urban hospitals. STUDY DESIGN. The study contrasts the precision of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques using data actually collected using the time-and-motion approach. That data set was used to generate a simulated set of work-sampling data points. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS. Trained observers followed residents during their 24-hour day and recorded the start and end time of each activity performed by the resident. The activities were coded and then grouped into ten major categories. Work-sampling data were derived from the raw time-and-motion data for hourly, half-hourly, and quarter-hourly observations. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. The actual time spent on different tasks as assessed by the time-and-motion analysis differed from the percent of time projected by work-sampling. The work-sampling results differed by 20 percent or more of the estimated value for eight of the ten activities. As expected, the standard deviation decreases as work-sampling observations become more frequent. CONCLUSIONS. Findings indicate that the work-sampling approach, as commonly employed, may not provide an acceptably precise approximation of the result that would be obtained by time-and-motion observations.

Full text

PDF
577

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABDELLAH F. G., LEVINE E. Work sampling applied to the study of nursing personnel. Nurs Res. 1954 Jun;3(1):11–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dickson W. M. Measuring pharmacist time use: a note on the use of fixed-interval work sampling. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978 Oct;35(10):1241–1243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Domenech M. A., Payton O., Hill J., Shukla R. K. Utilization of physical therapy personnel in one hospital. A work sampling study. Phys Ther. 1983 Jul;63(7):1108–1112. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.7.1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hsiao W. C., Braun P., Becker E. R., Thomas S. R. The Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. Toward the development of an alternative physician payment system. JAMA. 1987 Aug 14;258(6):799–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knickman J. R., Lipkin M., Jr, Finkler S. A., Thompson W. G., Kiel J. The potential for using non-physicians to compensate for the reduced availability of residents. Acad Med. 1992 Jul;67(7):429–438. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199207000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liptak G. S., Super D. M., Baker N., Roghmann K. J. An analysis of waiting times in a pediatric emergency department. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1985 Apr;24(4):202–209. doi: 10.1177/000992288502400405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lurie N., Rank B., Parenti C., Woolley T., Snoke W. How do house officers spend their nights? A time study of internal medicine house staff on call. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jun 22;320(25):1673–1677. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198906223202507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rascati K. L., Kimberlin C. L., McCormick W. C. Work measurement in pharmacy research. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Oct;43(10):2445–2452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reid R. A. A work sampling study of midlevel health professionals in a rural medical clinic. Med Care. 1975 Mar;13(3):241–249. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197503000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES