Skip to main content
Infectious Medicine logoLink to Infectious Medicine
letter
. 2022 Aug 24;1(3):224–226. doi: 10.1016/j.imj.2022.08.003

Neurodevelopment from 0 to 24 months in normocephalic children, in utero exposed to Zika virus in 2016: A cohort study

A Mallard a,⁎, L Kovacic a, B Tressieres b, E Couchy b, R Grant c,d, B Hoen e, A Cabié f
PMCID: PMC10699713  PMID: 38077623

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a neurotropic arbovirus almost exclusively transmitted by the bite of Aedes species mosquitoes [1].

An outbreak of ZIKV infection was first confirmed in Northeast of Brazil, early 2015. The prevalence of microcephaly in 15 states of Brazil with laboratory-confirmed ZIKV transmission significantly exceeded that in four states without confirmed ZIKV transmission [2].

Pomar et al. conducted a prospective study in 2016 in French Guiana that included 301 pregnant women with biological confirmation of ZIKV infection and 399 pregnant women who were negative for ZIKV infection. The number of fetuses with central nervous system involvement was higher in the infected group (9.0% vs 4.3%) [3].

A prospective study was conducted in 2016 in French overseas territories. It included women whose pregnancies overlapped with the 2016 Zika epidemic in Guadeloupe, Martinique and French Guiana. Babies born to mothers enrolled in this study were included in a prospective cohort following these babies from birth to 24 months.

The neurodevelopment in children exposed and non exposed in utero with ZIKV from 0 to 24 months was assessed longitudinally during medical visits at the age of 2, 4, 9, 18, and 24 months old, in accordance with the officially recommended routine health screenings of infants in France.

The study enrolled a number of 1180 newborns. Among these babies, 576 were excluded. Ultimately, the analysis was performed on 604 apparently healthy newborns at birth for whom ZIKV infection status in mother is known. Among them, 461 babies were exposed to ZIKV in utero and 143 were unexposed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Flow-chart.

The study shows better skills for naming image and reaching and grasping objects at 24 months in exposed children (Table 1). Other skills such as pincer grasp, giving back objects, putting cube in a box, sitting without support and eating by himself with a spoon were also better among exposed children, but not persistent at 24 months old.

Table 1.

Neurodevelopemental milestones in children from 0 to 24 months.

Characteristics Consultation at 2 months
Consultation at 4 months
Consultation at 9 months
Consultation at 18 months
Consultation at 24 months
Exposed Not Exposed Exposed Not Exposed Exposed Not Exposed Exposed Not Exposed Exposed Not Exposed
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
N 375 103 372 95 341 84 287 39 296 104
Reflex smile 346 (99.1) 99 (99.0) 362 (100.0) 92 (100.0) 320 (100.0) 78 (100.0) 285 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 292 (99.3) 104 (100.0)
Vocalizations 348 (98.9) 86 (98.9) 311 (100.0) 67 (100.0) 284 (99.6) 39 (100.0) 290 (99.0) 104 (100.0)
Laugh 328 (95.6) 83 (96.5) 306 (100.0) 64 (100.0) 285 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 293 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
Raises head on belly 327 (98.8) 97 (98.0) 355 (99.2) 93 (100.0) 318 (100.0) 80 (100.0) 285 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 294 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
Pass arms forward on belly 93 (66.0) 32 (84.2)b 290 (96.3) 89 (100.0) 282 (98.9) 69 (100.0) 285 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 294 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
Throwing objects 181 (96.3) 25 (100.0) 281 (99.3) 38 (100.0) 289 (99.7) 104 (100.0)
embed shapes 196 (72.1) 29 (82.9) 254 (91.0) 85 (89.5)
Holding a pencil and scrible 287 (99.3) 104 (100.0)
Sits without support 307 (97.2) 77 (100.0) 284 (99.6) 39 (100.0) 294 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
moves crawling 62 (37.3) 11 (36.7) 251 (95.1) 53 (98.1) 281 (98.9) 39 (100.0) 270 (93.1) 104 (100.0) a
Walks 292 (99.3) 104 (100.0)
Goes up and down the stairs 286 (97.6) 102 (98.1)
Reacts to his first name 110 (65.9) 19 (79.2) 319 (99.4) 75 (98.7) 283 (100.0) 38 (100.0) 293 (99.7) 104 (100.0)
Repeats a word 50 (26.3) 10 (38.5) 255 (90.4) 36 (97.3) 282 (95.9) 95 (91.3)
Understands simple order 125 (69.8) 26 (100.0)c 277 (98.6) 38 (100.0) 292 (99.3) 103 (100.0)
Names an image 266 (91.7) 79 (76.7)d
Asks going to the bathroom 168 (58.9) 53 (51.0)
Opens hands 116 (89.9) 22 (91.7) 231 (99.6) 54 (100.0) 265 (100.0) 51 (100.0) 284 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 293 (99.7) 104 (100.0)
Plays with hands 99 (77.3) 23 (95.8)- 347 (99.1) 87 (100.0) 306 (100.0) 66 (100.0) 284 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 286 (97.3) 104 (100.0)
Catchs an object when in touch 79 (68.1) 22 (95.7)b 326 (97.3) 83 (98.8) 306 (100.0) 66 (100.0) 284 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 273 (92.9) 104 (100.0)b
Catchs an object on his own 143 (80.8) 24 (80.0) 211 (98.6) 40 (100.0) 281 (99.3) 39 (100.0) 294 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
Kept seated hols his head 98 (81.0) 5 (21.7)⁎⁎⁎ 336 (98.5) 85 (100.0) 304 (100.0) 67 (100.0) 284 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 294 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
Thumb index pliers 184 (68.9) 54 (93.1)d 280 (98.9) 38 (100.0) 289 (98.3) 103 (99.0)
Gives objects 114 (62.0) 26 (92.9)c 282 (100.0) 37 (100.0) 292 (99.3) 103 (100.0)
Imitates gesture 281 (99.6) 38 (100.0) 289 (98.3) 103 (99.0)
Puts cube in box 38 (23.9) 16 (64.0)d 261 (94.2) 36 (97.3) 287 (98.6) 102 (99.0)
Sits with support 107 (62.2) 10 (34.5)c 298 (99.0) 74 (100.0) 284 (100.0) 39 (100.0) 292 (100.0) 104 (100.0)
Crawls on all fours 233 (88.6) 50 (94.3) 282 (98.9) 39 (100.0) 278 (95.5) 104 (100.0)+
Runs 39 (18.3) 8 (25.0) 281 (98.6) 39 (100.0) 290 (99.0) 104 (100.0)
stretches out his arms to be carried 184 (97.4) 25 (96.2) 282 (100.0) 38 (100.0) 291 (100.0) 103 (100.0)
Repeats a syllab 284 (89.9) 68 (95.8) 277 (97.9) 37 (100.0) 292 (99.3) 100 (97.1)
Coupled words 139 (51.7) 15 (40.5) 258 (87.2) 85 (83.3)
Designates objects by sounds/gestures 254 (93.0) 34 (94.4) 280 (94.9) 95 (93.1)
Dressing aid 265 (94.6) 36 (97.3) 290 (98.6) 100 (99.0)
Eats on his own with a spoon 13 (7.4) 7 (28.0)c 192 (69.1) 33 (89.2)* 272 (92.5) 99 (98.0)a
a

p-value <0.1.

b

p-value < 0.05.

c

p-value < 0.01.

d

p-value < 0.001.

Einspieler et al. conducted a cohort study in Brazil. They enrolled in the study 444 infants, including 111 children prenatally exposed to a maternal illness with rash and 333 children without any prenatal exposure to maternal illness. This study showed that 82.1% of ZIKV-exposed infants without congenital microcephaly were healthy at the age of 12 months [4].

Blackmond et al. included mother-child pairs during a period of active ZIKV transmission (April 2016–March 2017) and prospectively followed up children to 30 months. A total of 131 normocephalic ZIKV: exposed (n = 68) and unexposed (n = 63) children were assessed between 22 and 30 months of age. They showed that overall neurodevelopment was unaffected among these children born with normal head circumference [5].

Further studies would be necessary to assess if the minimal differences found in the neurodevelopment of children in the present study persist in their outcome beyond 24 months.

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Kauffman EB, Kramer LD. Zika virus mosquito vectors: competence, biology, and vector control. J. Infect. Dis. 2017;216(Suppl 10):S97690. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kleber de Oliveira W, Cortez-Escalante J, De Oliveira WT, et al. Increase in reported prevalence of microcephaly in infants born to women living in areas with confirmed zika virus transmission during the first trimester of pregnancy - Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2016;65(9):242–247. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6509e2. PMID: 26963593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pomar L, Malinger G, Benoist G, et al. Association between Zika virus and fetopathy: a prospective cohort study in French Guiana. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;49(6):729–736. doi: 10.1002/uog.17404. Epub 2017 May 4. PMID: 28078779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Einspieler C, Utsch F, Brasil P, et al. Association of infants exposed to prenatal Zika virus infection with their clinical, neurologic, and developmental status evaluated via the general movement assessment tool. JAMA Netw. Open. 2019;2(1) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7235. PMID: 30657537; PMCID: PMC6431234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blackmon K, Evans R, Fernandes M, et al. Neurodevelopment in normocephalic children with and without prenatal Zika virus exposure. Arch. Dis. Child. 2022;107(3):244–250. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321031. Epub 2021 Sep 3. PMID: 34479857; PMCID: PMC8857021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infectious Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES