Abstract
Coronavirus spike proteins mediate receptor binding and membrane fusion, making them prime targets for neutralizing antibodies. In the cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, spike proteins transition freely between open and closed conformations to balance host cell attachment and immune evasion1–5. Spike opening exposes domain S1B, allowing it to bind to proteinaceous receptors6,7, and is also thought to enable protein refolding during membrane fusion4,5. However, with a single exception, the pre-fusion spike proteins of all other coronaviruses studied so far have been observed exclusively in the closed state. This raises the possibility of regulation, with spike proteins more commonly transitioning to open states in response to specific cues, rather than spontaneously. Here, using cryogenic electron microscopy and molecular dynamics simulations, we show that the spike protein of the common cold human coronavirus HKU1 undergoes local and long-range conformational changes after binding a sialoglycan-based primary receptor to domain S1A. This binding triggers the transition of S1B domains to the open state through allosteric interdomain crosstalk. Our findings provide detailed insight into coronavirus attachment, with possibilities of dual receptor usage and priming of entry as a means of immune escape.
Subject terms: Virus-host interactions, Cryoelectron microscopy
Binding of a sialoglycan-based primary receptor by the spike protein of the common cold human coronavirus HKU1 triggers conformational changes to a state that would allow binding to a second receptor required for cell entry.
Main
Long before the advent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), four coronaviruses (CoVs) colonized the human population. Two of these, human CoVs HKU1 and OC43 in the betacoronavirus subgenus Embecovirus, independently arose from rodent reservoirs—either directly or through intermediate hosts8–10. Unlike other human CoVs, HKU1 and OC43 rely on cell surface glycans as indispensable primary receptors11,12. Their attachment and fusion spike proteins specifically bind to 9-O-acetylated sialosides11,13–17. Underlining the importance of glycan attachment, embecoviruses uniquely code for an additional envelope protein, haemagglutinin esterase, a sialate-O-acetylesterase serving as a receptor-destroying enzyme13,18,19. Recent observations suggest that HKU1 spike particularly targets α2,8-linked 9-O-acetylated disialosides (9-O-Ac-Sia(α2,8)Sia; that is, glycan motifs typical of oligosialogangliosides such as GD3). Accordingly, following overexpression of GD3 synthase ST8SIA1, HEK293T cells become susceptible to HKU1 S-pseudotyped viruses17.
CoV spike proteins are homotrimeric class I fusion proteins20. The spike protomer can be divided into an amino- and carboxy-terminal region designated S1 and S2, respectively. Distinct S1 domains mediate receptor binding21, whereas S2 comprises the fusion machinery (Fig. 1a). In HKU1 and OC43, attachment to 9-O-Ac-sialosides occurs through a well-conserved receptor-binding site located in spike protein domain S1A (Fig. 1a)15,16. There are indications, however, for the existence of a secondary receptor engaged through domain S1B, as epitopes of virus-neutralizing antibodies map to subdomain S1B2 (refs. 22–24). Moreover, in the case of HKU1, recombinantly expressed S1B blocks infection23, with single-site substitutions in S1B2 abolishing this activity24.
The spike proteins of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) occur in different conformations with their receptor-binding S1B domains either partially buried between neighbouring protomers (‘closed’ or ‘down’) or with one or more S1B domains exposed (1-, 2- and 3-up, ‘open’)2,5,7,25. The conformational dynamics of S1B, and modulation thereof, would provide CoVs with a means to balance host cell attachment and immune escape1. Recently, spontaneous conversion of S1B into the up conformation was also described for porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus26. However, available structures of all other CoV spike proteins, including those of HKU1 and OC43 (refs. 16,27), have been observed only in a closed conformation (Supplementary Table 1), shielding S1B from neutralizing antibodies but preventing S1B-mediated receptor engagement1,22. Adding to the conundrum, the transition from a closed to an open spike conformation has been linked to the elaborate conformational changes in S2 that drive fusion4,28,29. The question thus arises whether specific mechanisms might exist that trigger S1B conversion to the open state. Here we describe cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of a serotype A HKU1 (HKU1-A) spike protein in four conformations, one in a closed apo state, the others in complex with the HKU1 disialoside receptor 9-O-Ac-Sia(α2,8)Sia. We show that glycan receptor binding by S1A specifically prompts a conformational transition of S1B domains into 1- and eventually 3-up positions, apparently through an allosteric mechanism.
Structure of the apo HKU1-A spike protein
HKU1 field strains are divided into three genotypes with evidence of intertypic recombination, but essentially occur in two distinct serotypes, with either A- or B-type spike proteins30. Single-particle cryo-EM analysis of spike protein ectodomains of HKU1-A strain Caen1 yielded a reconstruction for the unbound state at a global resolution of 3.4 Å (Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig. 1, Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 and Supplementary Table 2). Notably, the HKU1-A spike protein trimers were found exclusively in a closed, pre-fusion conformation as reported for a serotype B HKU1 (HKU1-B) spike protein27. The HKU1-A and HKU1-B spike proteins, at 84% sequence identity (Supplementary Fig. 3), are highly similar in global structure with an average Cα root mean square deviation of 1.1 Å for pruned atom pairs (Extended Data Fig. 2a). Compared to the HKU1-B model, our data allowed building an additional 231 residues per protomer. Among newly built segments are the membrane-proximal connecting domain (residues 776–796 and 1152–1225) and the linker between the S1/S2 and S2′ protease cleavage sites (residues 878–907; Fig. 1c). We could also model a major portion of S1B2 (residues 480–575) such that this subdomain—purportedly crucial for protein receptor binding—is now fully resolved in the context of an intact HKU1 spike trimer, our findings essentially confirming the crystal structure of a HKU1-A S1B-C fragment (residues 310–677)24 (Extended Data Fig. 2b). In addition, 20 N-linked glycans per protomer were built, all well supported by the density map (Fig. 1b). Several glycans are engaged in interprotomer contacts (for example, N1215; Supplementary Fig. 4), among which the S1B N355-glycan may help stabilize the HKU1-A spike trimer in the closed conformation by contacting the clockwise neighbouring protomer via Y528 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Using site-specific glycosylation patterns of HKU1-B (ref. 31), we carried out molecular dynamics simulations of the fully glycosylated spike ectodomain trimer. HKU1-A spike is largely shielded by glycans leaving only a few regions exposed, most notably the sialic acid-binding site in domain S1A (Extended Data Fig. 2c).
Predictably similar in overall arrangement, the apo structures of A- and B-type spike trimers differ in the orientation of their S1A domains, with those of HKU1-A tilted outwards (Extended Data Fig. 2a). The S1A 9-O-Ac-Sia-binding site is conserved in HKU1-A S1A, as expected, with key ligand contact residues K80, T/S82 and W89 (ref. 15) aligning with those in HKU1-B spike (Extended Data Fig. 2d,e). There are, however, notable differences in binding site topology. In HKU1-B, the 9-O-Ac-Sia-binding site is located within a narrow crevice between loop elements e1 (residues 29–37) and e2 (residues 246–252)15,16. In the HKU1-A spike apo structure, the p1 and p2 pockets that accommodate the sialoside 9-O-Ac and 5-N-Ac moieties, respectively, are much less prominent owing to a consequential outward displacement of the e1 loop (see below).
Glycan binding triggers opening of S1B
Incubation of the HKU1-A spike protein with the receptor analogue 9-O-Ac-Neu5Ac-α2,8-Neu5Ac-Lc-biotin (Supplementary Fig. 6) led to marked conformational changes yielding a surprising heterogeneity in structures. We identified and modelled three distinct conformations: a fully closed state (3.8 Å resolution), a partially opened state with a single S1B domain rotated upwards by 101° (1-up, 5 Å resolution) and a fully opened state (3-up, 3.7 Å resolution; Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 3, Supplementary Figs. 2, 7 and 8 and Supplementary Table 2). A 2-up state was not detected. In all holo structures, clear densities for the disialoside were observed within S1A receptor-binding sites (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9). Apparently, binding of a specific 9-O-Ac-Sia-based primary receptor analogue by the S1A domain triggers an allosteric mechanism, causing the exposure of S1B domains located 40 Å from the S1A binding pocket (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 10).
We propose a stepwise model for ligand-induced spike opening (Supplementary Video 1). In the starting apo state, each S1B domain is held in place, wedged between the S1A and S1B domains of the anticlockwise neighbouring Y-shaped protomer. Of the two observed protein–protein interfaces, the one with S1A buries a larger surface area (Supplementary Fig. 5; 1,207 Å2 versus 442 Å2). In the presence of the S1A ligand, most spike trimers transitioned into the 1- or 3-up open states. However, 25% of ligand-bound particles remained fully closed. The structure of this ‘closed holo’ trimer is distinct from that of non-complexed apo trimers, marking it as an initial step in a series of conformational transitions. Ligand binding in the ‘closed holo’ state is associated with intradomain conformational changes within S1A. In particular, the upper S1A1 subdomain (residues 14–39 and 72–260) rotates inwards by 9° relative to S1A2 and the remainder of the spike monomer (Fig. 3). Whereas this motion leaves the S1B–S1B interface unaltered, it has a profound effect on the S1A–S1B contact area, displacing interfacing residues by approximately 8 Å (Extended Data Fig. 4). This reshaping of the S1A–S1B interface seems to be the key phenomenon from which subsequent upward rotation of the first S1B domain follows, involving a 101° rotation and raising the tip of the S1B2 subdomain by 50 Å (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Video 2 and Supplementary Fig. 11).
The large conformational change of S1B going from the closed holo to the holo up state is accompanied by additional domain rotations of S1A, S1C and S1D (Fig. 3b). Conversion into the ‘1-up’ state eliminates the S1B–S1B interdomain contact. The apparent absence of particles in a ‘2-up’ conformation might be explained by the fact that a lone downward-oriented S1B lacks any such stabilizing interactions with neighbouring S1B domains, probably making this a transient intermediate.
To rule out the possibility that a subset of open S1B domains exist within the apo dataset, we symmetry-expanded the particles from the apo reconstruction and carried out three-dimensional variability analysis on the masked S1B domain. No open S1B domains in the apo dataset were identified. When the same analysis was carried out on the ‘1-up’ particles, open and closed domains could be easily discriminated, confirming the validity of this approach (Extended Data Fig. 5).
To substantiate our observations, we acquired a dataset with a sialoglycan-binding-defective mutant W89A HKU1 spike15 in the presence of the 9-O-Ac-disialoside as a negative control (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 6, Supplementary Figs. 2 and 12 and Supplementary Table 2). Again, the spike trimers were all fully closed and morphologically indistinguishable from the unbound apo state of the parental spike protein, reinforcing the notion that binding of 9-O-Ac-Sia(α2,8)Sia is key for allosteric release of S1B.
Local conformational changes in S1A
Local refinement of the symmetrical closed structure of the HKU1–ligand complex allowed us to visualize the disialoside bound in the S1A receptor-binding site (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Table 2), with both Sia moieties discernible. The location of the essential terminal Sia (Sia2) is as expected for a canonical 9-O-Ac-Sia-binding site15 and matches that of the holo cryo-EM structure of OC43 spike protein16 (Supplementary Fig. 13). Its assigned orientation positions the sialate-9-O-acetyl and sialate-5-N-acetyl moieties so that they can dock into pockets p1 and p2, respectively, astride the perpendicularly placed W89 side chain. The Sia2 carboxylate is poised to interact with K80 and T82 through a salt bridge and hydrogen bond (Fig. 4b). Using dedicated molecular dynamics simulations of the free disialoside, we identified favourable glycan conformers to restrain modelling of the flexible α2,8-glycosidic linkage and were able to build the outward-facing, reducing-end Sia (Sia1) close to the e2 loop (Extended Data Fig. 7).
Binding of the ligand to the S1A binding site is accompanied by local conformational changes, most conspicuously involving the displacement of the flanking e1 loop by 3 Å. W89 and T30 are brought in proximity to allow side-chain hydrogen bonding, stabilizing the p1 pocket, and P33 shifts towards the p2 pocket. Concomitantly, the N29 glycan, unresolved in the apo structure, becomes partially ordered and is displaced by 5 Å away from the S1A–S1B interface (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Video 3). With the N terminus stapled to the S1A1 core by means of a disulfide bond (C20–C156), the local changes in e1 are distally translated into long-range conformational changes. These extend all the way down to Y38, some 25 Å away from the binding pocket (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Video 4), located within a triple-strand hinge region that links the S1A1 and S1A2 subdomains (Fig. 4c,d). The resulting register shift between the e1 segment (residues 29–37) and its neighbouring interacting partner (residues 73–81; indicated in black in Fig. 4c,d) seemingly drives the inward 9° rotation of the S1A1 subdomain about the S1A1/A2 axis (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Video 5).
MD analysis of S1A
The inherent flexibility of the disialoside-binding pocket limits local resolution and the analysis of inter-residue interactions in our cryo-EM models. To gather atomistic insight into ligand binding, especially of Sia1, and the resulting shift in the protein conformational equilibrium, we carried out molecular dynamics simulations of the S1A domain on an accumulated timescale of 70 μs.
Simulations starting from the ligand-bound cryo-EM holo structure revealed one dominating disialoside conformer in which the carboxylate of Sia1 interacts through a salt bridge with K84 and the Sia1 5-N is stabilized by a hydrogen bond with T82 (Fig. 5a, Extended Data Figs. 8 and 9 and Supplementary Video 6).
Taking an unbiased molecular dynamics approach to the conformational transition of e1, we used our structure of the apo S1A domain as a starting model. The disialoside was placed into the binding pocket guided by the well-established orientation of 9-O-Ac-Sia2. Both the e1 and e2 loops showed pronounced dynamics in all trajectories as shown by a per-residue root mean square deviation analysis (Extended Data Fig. 10a). Saliently, conformational transitions observed in the e1 loop mirrored those identified on comparison of the apo and closed holo cryo-EM models, even though the molecular dynamics data were obtained fully independently (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Video 7). The observations were extended and corroborated by simulations with the S1A domain of the HKU1-A N1 reference strain30, which differs from the Caen1 variant in that it carries a tyrosine instead of lysine at position 84 (Extended Data Fig. 10b). All local conformational changes were observed, although a loss in stabilizing interactions of Sia1 was noted, as would be expected owing to the absence of K84 (Extended Data Fig. 8d and Supplementary Tables 3–5).
In the p1 pocket, two hydrogen bonds can form spontaneously, S86–L28 and T30–W89, with S86 and T30 orienting their hydrophilic hydroxyl groups away from the cavity. Alternatively, the crucial hydrogen bond with W89 can also be established with the neighbouring T31 side chain (Supplementary Fig. 14). Flanking the p2 pocket, interaction of P33 with F94 leads to a reduction in hydrophobic surface area and may contribute favourably to stability of the holo state of e1 in water. Further away from p2, long-range changes involving e1 residues R34 and S36 become apparent in the simultaneous breaking of two interstrand backbone hydrogen bonds (S36–D76 and Y38–F74) and their re-formation with new partners (R34–D76 and S36–F74) in a ‘register shift’ motion (Fig. 5b), in full accordance with the observations by cryo-EM (Fig. 4c,d).
Two sets of control simulations of S1A allowed us to infer a specific role of the ligand in the observed S1A dynamics (Extended Data Fig. 10). In keeping with the inherent flexibility of the e1 loop, all individual e1 interactions can indeed also occur in the absence of the ligand. Without the ligand, however, these interactions remained highly dynamic. Yet, when the ligand encountered the alternative e1 state, either ‘naturally’ during the simulations or by simulations of a pre-built complex resembling the ‘holo’ cryo-EM structure, this pattern changed substantially. The hallmark interactions, including the signature register shift in the S1A1–S1A2 hinge, reproducibly remained stable for several hundred nanoseconds. The collective results of cryo-EM and molecular dynamics analyses indicate that ligand binding stabilizes the shifted topology of the e1 element, apparently locking subdomain S1A1 in a state that allows subsequent conformational S1B changes to occur.
Discussion
The dynamic sampling of open and closed conformations by sarbecovirus and merbecovirus spike proteins has become emblematic of how CoVs would balance host cell attachment and immune escape. The transition to the open state exposes subdomain S1B for its binding to proteinaceous cell surface receptors and is also deemed crucial to allow protein refolding during S-mediated membrane fusion. Remarkably, however, with rare exception the pre-fusion spike proteins from all other CoVs studied so far have all been observed in the closed state exclusively (Supplementary Table 1). Here we shed new light on this apparent contradiction by demonstrating that the spike protein of a HKU1-A strain can in fact transition into an open state, albeit not spontaneously but on a specific cue. Binding of the disialoside-based receptor 9-O-Ac-Sia(α2,8)Sia to S1A triggers a major shift causing the S1B subdomain to become exposed in a 1-up and eventually fully open, 3-up conformation. The exposure of S1B2 would allow for interactions with a putative secondary receptor and thus adds to the notion that such a receptor exists23,24. On the basis of the collective data, we propose a model in which binding to a primary sialoglycan-based receptor triggers opening of S1B, which in turn engages a yet unidentified secondary receptor required for entry (Fig. 6).
Four different spike protien structures were identified that together capture a trajectory from a closed apo to a fully open holo conformation. The initial step, S1A disialoside binding, converts the protein into a conformationally distinct state, still fully closed but primed for S1B transition, transient yet stable enough to be detected in our analyses. The binding of the disialoside receptor analogue leads to various structural changes within the S1A1 subdomain. Most prominently, it stabilizes an alternative topology of the e1 element, only fleetingly attained in the apo structure. Inward e1 displacement walls off one side of the 9-O-Ac-Sia-binding site, deepening the p1 pocket and adding to its hydrophobicity. Accommodation of the sialate-9-O-acetyl within the p1 pocket may well act as the nucleating event from which other conformational changes follow. These extend to a distal hinge element that connects the S1A1 and S1A2 subdomains.
Our findings suggest a causal mechanistic relationship between the disialoside-induced conformational changes in e1, S1A1 rotation, the remodelling of the S1A–S1B interface and S1B expulsion. Yet, we note that the topology of the e1 element in our HKU1-A spike apo structure is atypical and differs from that in the spike protein of HKU1-B and those of betacoronavirus-1 variants OC43, bovine CoV and porcine haemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus15,16,27,32 (Supplementary Fig. 15). In the apo structures of these other proteins, the extended e1 element already adopts the topology of that in the HKU1-A closed holo structure. Moreover, in the HKU1-B spike apo structure, subdomains S1A1 and S1A2 are in similar spatial juxtaposition as in the A-type spike holo conformation. Under the assumption that the other embecovirus spike proteins also transition into an open conformation, they might do so through a distinct allosteric mechanism. However, given that cryo-EM models are based on averaging, it is quite possible that also in the HKU1-B and betacoronavirus-1 spike proteins the e1 element continuously samples both topologies. If so, the transition of S1B into the up position may critically depend on an increase in the lifetime of the shifted state as induced by S1A ligand binding. The difference between the A- and B-type spike proteins in their preferred apo topologies of the e1 element may have arisen from immune selection. Indeed, we recently demonstrated that the S1A receptor-binding site of OC43, which exhibits the shifted topology, is targeted by potent neutralizing antibodies22.
The question remains why the transition into S1B up conformations was not observed in our previous study of an OC43 S–receptor complex16. Possibly, the 9-O-Ac-Sia monosaccharide that was used as a receptor analogue does not suffice to trigger the conformational changes and a more complex glycan may be required. Of note, OC43 spike binds to α2,3- and α2,6-linked 9-O-Ac-sialosides16, but exhibits a preference for 9-O-Ac-Sia(α2,8)Sia17. Evidence that OC43 spike proteins can indeed transition to an open state with S1B exposure comes from our recent observation of neutralizing antibodies targeting cryptic S1B epitopes. Moreover, virus neutralization by these antibodies selected for resistance mutations in the e1 loop of S1A (ref. 22). These results align with our present observations for HKU1, indicating that there is allosteric crosstalk between the S1A and S1B domains shared among embecoviruses. Hypervariable S1A loop elements controlling both S1B opening and S2′ proteolytic processing, as described for SARS-CoV-2, might even indicate that this is a universal feature of (beta)coronavirus spike proteins33,34. In this view, sarbecoviruses and merbecoviruses spontaneously exposing S1B would not be exceptions but part of a mechanistic spectrum, with other CoVs, such as HKU1, relying on specific triggers such as binding to primary receptors by S1A. To our knowledge, this is the first description of a CoV spike protein exposing its S1B domain on cue. Our observations suggest that CoV attachment may be even more sophisticated than appreciated so far, with possibilities of dual receptor usage and priming of entry to escape immune detection.
Methods
Expression and purification of trimeric HKU1 spike ectodomains
The sequence of a HKU1-A spike protein (GenBank: ADN03339.1) coding for the ectodomain (residues 12–1266) was cloned into the pCG2 expression vector with an exogenous CD5 signal peptide. At the 3′ end, the coding sequence was ligated in frame with a GCN4 trimerization motif (IKRMKQIEDKIEEIESKQKKIENEIARIKKIK)35,36, a thrombin cleavage site (LVPRGSLE), an 8-residue long Strep-Tag (WSHPQFEK) and a stop codon. The furin cleavage site at the S1/S2 junction was mutated from RRKRR to GGSGS to avert cleavage of the spike protein (Supplementary Fig. 17). The resulting construct was used for transient expression in HEK293T cells and purified as previously described37. In brief, after incubation of the cells for 5 days, spike glycoprotein was purified from cleared cell culture supernatants by affinity chromatography using StrepTactin beads (IBA) and eluted in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM d-biotin. The W89A mutant protein was produced as described previously17.
Sample preparation for cryo-EM
For the apo complex, 3 µl of 4.3 µM HKU1 spike trimer was applied to QuantiFoil R1.2/1.3 grids that had been glow-discharged for 30 s on a GloQube (Quorum) at 20 mW power. The sample was applied at 4 °C and 95% relative humidity inside a Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Scientific). The grids were then blotted for 7 s with +2 blot force and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane. For the holo complex and W89A negative control, 7 µl of 4.3 μM wild-type or mutant HKU1 spike trimer was combined with 3 µl of 1 mM sugar, resulting in a final spike protein concentration of 3 μM and sugar concentration of 300 μM. The samples were then incubated at room temperature for about 10 min before vitrification, which was carried out as described for the apo sample.
Cryo-EM data acquisition
The apo and holo HKU1 spike samples were imaged on a Thermo Scientific Krios G4 Cryo-TEM equipped with a K3 direct electron detector and a BioContinuum energy filter (Gatan) using EPU 2 acquisition software. The stage was pre-tilted to 30° to improve the orientation distribution of the particles. A total of 4,207 videos for apo spike and 4,065 videos for the holo spike were collected at a super-resolution pixel size of 0.415 Å per pixel, with 40 fractions per video and a total dose of 46 electrons per Å2. Defocus targets cycled from −1.5 to −2.5 μm.
The W89A mutant HKU1 spike incubated with disialoside was imaged on a Thermo Scientific Glacios cryo-TEM instrument equipped with a Falcon 4 direct electron detector using EPU 2 acquisition software. The stage was pre-tilted to 30° to improve the orientation distribution of the particles. A total of 896 videos were collected at 0.92 Å per pixel with 40 fractions per video and a total dose of 42 electrons per Å2. Defocus targets cycled from −1.5 to −2.5 μm. A summary of all data collection parameters is shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Single-particle image processing
For the apo complex, patch motion correction, using an output F-crop factor of 0.5, and patch CTF estimation were carried out in cryoSPARC live38. Micrographs with a CTF estimated resolution of worse than 10 Å were discarded, leaving 4,202 images for further processing. The blob picker tool was then used to select 9,144,772 particles that were then extracted in a 100-pixel box (Fourier binned 4 × 4) and then exported to cryoSPARC for further processing. A single round of two-dimensional (2D) classification was carried out, after which 183,886 particles were retained. Ab initio reconstruction generated one well-defined reconstruction of the closed HKU1 spike protein. Particles belonging to this class were then re-extracted in a 300-pixel box. During extraction, particles were Fourier binned by a non-integer value, resulting in a final pixel size of 1.1067 Å. Subsequently, non-uniform refinement was carried out on the extracted particles with C3 symmetry imposed39, yielding a reconstruction with a global resolution of 3.3 Å. Subsequently, each particle from the C3-symmetry-imposed reconstruction was assigned three orientations corresponding to its symmetry-related views using the symmetry expansion job. A soft mask encompassing one S1A domain was made in UCSF Chimera40, and used for local refinement of the expanded particles, yielding a map with a global resolution of 3.8 Å.
For the holo complex, patch motion correction, using an output F-crop factor of 0.5, and patch CTF estimation were carried out in cryoSPARC live38. Micrographs with a CTF estimated resolution of worse than 10 Å were discarded, leaving 4,045 images for further processing. The blob picker tool was then used to select 956,697 particles that were then extracted in a 100-pixel box (Fourier binned 4 × 4) and then exported to cryoSPARC for further processing. Four parallel rounds of 2D classification were carried out, using an initial classification uncertainty value of 1, 2, 4 or 6. Subsequently, the well-defined spike classes were selected from each 2D run and combined. Duplicate particles were then removed, after which 169,728 particles were retained. Ab initio reconstruction generated two classes corresponding to the closed and 3-up spike trimer. Particles from these two classes were used as the input for a second round of ab initio reconstruction that produced two classes corresponding to the 3-up and 1-up spike trimer, although the latter seem to be a convolution of 1-up and closed particles. These two volumes were then used as initial models for a round of heterogeneous refinement. To avoid missing spike particles that may have been removed during initial stringent selection of 2D classes, heterogeneous refinement was carried out on a larger particle stack of 895,888 particles, from which only carbon classes had been removed from the initial stack. Heterogeneous refinement produced two well-defined reconstructions of the 3-up and 1-up conformations. Particles corresponding to the 3-up class were subjected to a single round of 2D classification and the clearly defined spike protein classes were selected. These were then re-extracted in a 300-pixel box. During extraction, particles were Fourier binned by a non-integer value, resulting in a final pixel size of 1.1067 Å. Subsequently, non-uniform refinement was carried out on the extracted particles with C3 symmetry imposed39, yielding a reconstruction with a global resolution of 3.7 Å. As a result of the apparent heterogeneity in the 1-up sample, an additional round of heterogeneous refinement was carried out on the 895,888-particle stack, using higher-quality initial models, namely the fully refined 3-up map and the 1-up map obtained from the second round of ab initio reconstruction. Heterogeneous refinement produced well-defined reconstructions of the 3-up and 1-up conformations. Particles corresponding to both classes were individually subjected to a single round of 2D classification and the clearly defined spike classes were selected. These were then individually re-extracted in a 300-pixel box. During extraction, particles were Fourier binned by a non-integer value, resulting in a final pixel size of 1.1067 Å. Subsequently, non-uniform refinement was carried out on the extracted particles with C3 or C1 symmetry imposed, yielding reconstructions with global resolutions of 3.56 and 4.13 Å for the 3-up and 1-up conformations, respectively. After global refinement, a soft mask encompassing one S1A domain of the 3-up sample was made in UCSF Chimera. Local refinement was then carried out on the 3-up particles, yielding a map with a global resolution of 4.19 Å. The particles belonging to the 1-up reconstruction were subjected to another round of heterogeneous refinement, which produced two clear reconstructions of the closed and 1-up spike protein. Non-uniform refinement was carried out on both sets of particles with C3 or C1 symmetry imposed, yielding reconstructions with global resolutions of 3.68 and 4.68 Å for the closed and 1-up conformations, respectively. For the closed spike protein, each particle from the C3-symmetry-imposed reconstruction was assigned three orientations corresponding to its symmetry-related views using the symmetry expansion job. A soft mask encompassing one S1A domain was made in UCSF Chimera40, and the symmetry-expanded particles were subjected to masked 3D variability analysis41. Local refinement was then carried out on the particles belonging to the best resolved cluster, yielding a map with a global resolution of 4.13 Å.
For the W89A mutant HKU1 spike incubated with disialoside, patch motion correction was carried out in MotionCor2 (ref. 42), implemented through Relion version 3.1.1 (ref. 43). The motion-corrected micrographs were then imported into cryoSPARC for patch CTF estimation and further processing steps38. The blob picker tool was used to select 215,843 particles that were then extracted in a 100-pixel box (Fourier binned 4 × 4). A single round of 2D classification was carried out, after which 38,838 particles were retained. Ab initio reconstruction generated one well-defined reconstruction of the closed HKU1 spike protein. Particles belonging to this class were then re-extracted in a 300-pixel box. During extraction, particles were Fourier binned by a non-integer value, resulting in a final pixel size of 1.2267 Å. Subsequently, non-uniform refinement was then carried out on the extracted particles with C3 symmetry imposed39, yielding a reconstruction with a global resolution of 5.1 Å. Subsequently, each particle from the C3-symmetry-imposed reconstruction was assigned three orientations corresponding to its symmetry-related views using the symmetry expansion job. A soft mask encompassing one S1A domain was then made in UCSF Chimera40, and used for local refinement of the expanded particles, yielding a map with a global resolution of 5.4 Å.
The ‘gold standard’ Fourier shell correlation (FSC) criterion (FSC = 0.143) was used for calculating all resolution estimates, and 3D-FSC plots were generated in cryoSPARC44. To facilitate model building, globally refined maps were sharpened using DeepEMhancer (version 0.13)45, as implemented in COSMIC246, or filtered by local resolution in cryoSPARC.
Modelling
Initially, a homology model for HKU1-A spike protein was generated by Phyre 2 (ref. 47) with the embecovirus OC43 spike structure (Protein Data Bank (PDB) 6NZK)24 as template. The HKU1-A spike homology model was rigid body fitted into the apo-state cryo-EM map using the UCSF Chimera40 tool Fit in map. The crystal structure of HKU1-A S1B (PDB 5KWB; ref. 24) was used to replace the equivalent S1B domain in the homology model owing to clearly wrong homology modelling. Models were refined by carrying out iterative cycles of manual model building using Coot48 and real-space refinement using Phenix49. The Coot carbohydrate module50 was used for building N-linked glycans, which were manually inspected and corrected. The apo state was modelled first, owing to its highest resolution. Subsequently, the closed holo, the holo 3-up and the holo 1-up were modelled in that order, using previous models as a starting point. For the initial holo (closed) S1A model, Namdinator51 was used for flexible fitting in a locally refined and unsharpened map for the closed holo S1A. Model validation was carried out using Molprobity and Privateer52–54.
Elbow55 was used to generate ligand restraints for the 9-O-acetylated terminal sialic acid based on the ‘MJJ’ ligand in the OC43 spike cryo-EM structure (PDB 6NZK)16, after which atom names were manually modified to be consistent with the earlier standard MJJ model and general sialic acid atom numbering, and the O2-attached methyl linker atoms of the original MJJ ligand were trimmed. As there is no standard MJJ–SIA α2,8 linkage defined in software packages used at present, we used molecular dynamics-based restraints (see below) to model this glycosidic linkage of the disialoside. The following restraints were used for the glycosidic linkage between the terminal 9-O-acetylated sialic acid (ligand code MJJ) and the penultimate sialic acid (ligand code SIA) based on the most common solution conformer: bond distance C2–O8 of 1.38 Å (σ of 0.01 Å); bond angles of 109.5° for O8–C2–O6 and for O8–C2–C3, and 114.5° for O8–C2–C1 (all σ of 2.0°); dihedral angles of 295.0° for C1–C2–O8–C8 and of 122° for C2–O8–C8–C7 (both σ of 5.0°).
MD simulations
Starting structures of the molecular systems were built on the basis of the cryo-EM structures of HKU1 (this work) using the graphical interface of YASARA56. The N-glycans were attached to the protein on the basis of data from quantitative site-specific N-linked analysis of HKU1 spike protein31. Models of the complexes with α-Neu5,9Ac-(2-8)-α-Neu5Ac-OMe were built on the basis of the holo and apo versions of S1A (residues 14–299). The ligand was positioned manually into the binding site guided by interactions found in PDB entry 6NZK (hCoV-OC43). The HKU1 N1 sequence was taken from GenBank entry NC_006577.2.
Each system was positioned in a periodic rectangular cuboid simulation box (10 Å buffer around the solute) and the AMBER14 force field was selected, which uses ff14SB (ref. 57) and GLYCAM06j (ref. 58) parameters (including mixed 1–4 scaling). YASARA offers several automated workflows (termed experiments) for system setup. The ‘neutralization experiment’ was used to adjust the protonation states of the amino acids (pH 7.4)59 and to solvate the system in 0.9% NaCl solution (0.15 M). The ‘minimization experiment’ (short steepest descent minimization followed by simulated annealing minimization until convergence is reached) was used to remove conformational stress in the system. Simulations were carried out at 310 K using periodic boundary conditions and the particle mesh Ewald algorithm60 to treat long-range electrostatic interactions. Temperature was rescaled using a tuned Berendsen thermostat61. The box size was rescaled dynamically to maintain a water density of 0.996 g ml−1 (‘densostat’ method for pressure coupling)62. Position restraints were active during the equilibration phase for at least 3 ns (at the beginning, on all protein heavy atoms, and then only on backbone atoms). To prevent dissociation of the ligand, distance restraints were applied to maintain the critical H bonds for binding (between atoms K80:O and SIA_2:N5; K80:NZ and SIA_2:O1A; T82:OG1 and SIA_2:O1B). Production simulations were carried out using YASARA with GPU acceleration in ‘fast mode’ (mixed multiple time-step algorithm reaching 5 fs)62 on ‘standard computing boxes’ equipped, for example, with one 12-core i9 CPU and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Harmonic position restraints (stretching force constant = 1 N m−1) were applied to protein backbone atoms of residues 48–65 and 264–299 of the S1A system to prevent system rotation in the cuboid box and to deal with the ‘artificially loose end’ at residue 299. The average root mean square deviation of the protein Cα atoms was monitored to check the overall stability of the simulation.
To visualize the glycan coverage of the closed spike protein, the fully glycosylated ectodomain system (590,814 atoms) was simulated with position restraints on backbone atoms of residues 1080–1110 for 250 ns with a performance of about 4 ns per day. Molecular systems based on S1A alone were smaller (approximately 32,500–56,200 atoms, depending on the size of the N-glycans attached) and were sampled for an accumulated timescale of approximately 20 µs for the Caen1 sequence (apo + disialoside ligand, 5 µs, 6 simulations; holo, 15 µs, 27 simulations) and 52 µs for the N1 sequence (apo, 12 µs, 13 simulations; apo + disialoside ligand, 23 µs, 34 simulations; holo, 17 µs, 22 simulations) with individual simulations reaching up to 1.6 µs. The performance was about 100–200 ns per day. Distances shown in Fig. 5b were calculated from an example trajectory (Extended Data Fig. 10a) between the following atoms: L28:O and S86:OG; P33:CG and F94:CA; T30:O and W89:NE1; S36:N and F74:O; R34:O and -D76:N. Additionally, the solvated disialoside ligand was simulated without the protein using YASARA (general molecular dynamics parameters used as described above) in a cubic box with side length of 37 Å for 10 µs at 310 K using GLYCAM06j parameters. These simulation data were used to identify low-energy conformers of the disialoside ligand, which were used to support the modelling of the reducing-end Neu5Ac residue into the local low-resolution cryo-EM density.
Conformational Analysis Tools (http://www.md-simulations.de/CAT/) was used for analysis of trajectory data, general data processing and generation of scientific plots. VMD63 was used to generate molecular graphics.
Analysis and visualization
Spike interface areas were calculated using PDBePISA64. Surface colouring of HKU1-A spike protein according to sequence conservation was carried out using Consurf65 and visualized in UCSF ChimeraX66. The UCSF Chimera MatchMaker tool was used to obtain root mean square deviation values, using default settings. Domain rotations were calculated with CCP4 (ref. 67) Superpose68. Figures were generated using UCSF ChimeraX66 and BioRender.com. Structural biology applications used in this project were compiled and configured by SBGrid69.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06599-z.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank R. Dijkman for providing the HKU1 Caen1 sequence and J. de Groot-Mijnes for critically reading the manuscript. We are grateful for computer time provided by BIOGNOS AB, Göteborg. This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council 2014-03250042 (Y.L.). This work made use of the Dutch national e-infrastructure with the support of the SURF Cooperative using grant no. EINF-2453, awarded to D.L.H. R.C. acknowledges funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (494746248). R.J.G.H. is financially supported by a Dutch research council NWO-XS grant (OCENW.XS22.3.110). G.-J.B. is supported by an ERC advanced grant (SWEETPROMISE, 101020769); M.F.P. and D.L.H. are supported by NWO Veni grants (VI.Veni.202.271 and VI.Veni.212.102, respectively). J.S. is financially supported by the Dutch Research Council NWO Gravitation 2013 BOO, Institute for Chemical Immunology (024.002.009).
Extended data figures and tables
Author contributions
Y.L., R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. conceived the project; Y.L., M.F., R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. designed the experiments; Y.L. designed and cloned the protein constructs and carried out protein expression and purification; I.D., Z.L., F.J.M.v.K., J.S., B.-J.B., G.-J.B. and M.F. provided access to equipment and reagents; I.D. carried out cryo-EM sample preparation and data collection; D.L.H. processed the cryo-EM data; M.F.P. and D.L.H. built and refined the atomic models. M.F. carried our molecular dynamics simulations; M.F.P., R.C., M.F., R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. analysed and visualized the data; M.F.P., R.C., M.F. and D.L.H. curated the data. R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. supervised the project. M.F.P., R.C., R.J.G.H., R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. carried out project administration. M.F.P., Y.L., R.J.G.H., R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. obtained funding. M.F.P., R.C., R.J.G.H., R.J.d.G. and D.L.H. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and editing subsequent versions.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Jodi Hadden and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The atomic models of the apo, holo, 1-up and 3-up HCoV-HKU1 spike have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession codes 8OHN, 8OPM, 8OPN and 8OPO. The globally and locally refined cryo-EM maps have been deposited to the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes EMD-16882, EMD-17076, EMD-17077, EMD-17078, EMD-17079, EMD-17080, EMD-17081, EMD-17082 and EMD-17083. Data files pertaining to molecular dynamics simulation results shown in Fig. 5b and Extended Data Figs. 7–10 are available at 10.5281/zenodo.7867090.
Competing interests
I.D. is an employee of Thermo Fisher Scientific and M.F. is an employee of Biognos AB. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Raoul J. de Groot, Email: r.j.degroot@uu.nl
Daniel L. Hurdiss, Email: d.l.hurdiss@uu.nl
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-023-06599-z.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06599-z.
References
- 1.Walls AC, et al. Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016;23:899–905. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yuan Y, et al. Cryo-EM structures of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins reveal the dynamic receptor binding domains. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:e42166. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walls AC, et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181:281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Walls AC, et al. Unexpected receptor functional mimicry elucidates activation of coronavirus fusion. Cell. 2019;176:1026–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gui M, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding. Cell Res. 2017;27:119–129. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Song W, Gui M, Wang X, Xiang Y. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007236. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yan R, et al. Structural basis for the different states of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in complex with ACE2. Cell Res. 2021;31:717–719. doi: 10.1038/s41422-021-00490-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lau SKP, et al. Discovery of a novel coronavirus, China Rattus coronavirus HKU24, from Norway rats supports the murine origin of Betacoronavirus 1 and has implications for the ancestor of Betacoronavirus lineage A. J. Virol. 2015;89:3076–3092. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02420-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cui J, Li F, Shi Z-L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:181–192. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vijgen L, et al. Complete genomic sequence of human coronavirus OC43: molecular clock analysis suggests a relatively recent zoonotic coronavirus transmission event. J. Virol. 2005;79:1595–1604. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.3.1595-1604.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang X, et al. Human coronavirus HKU1 spike protein uses O-acetylated sialic acid as an attachment receptor determinant and employs hemagglutinin-esterase protein as a receptor-destroying enzyme. J. Virol. 2015;89:7202. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00854-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Matrosovich, M., Herrler, G. & Klenk, H. D. Sialic acid receptors of viruses. in SialoGlyco Chemistry and Biology II. Topics in Current Chemistry Vol. 367 (eds Gerardy-Schahn, R. et al.) 1–28 (Springer, 2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Vlasak R, Luytjes W, Spaan W, Palese P. Human and bovine coronaviruses recognize sialic acid-containing receptors similar to those of influenza C viruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1988;85:4526–4529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Künkel F, Herrler G. Structural and functional analysis of the surface protein of human coronavirus OC43. Virology. 1993;195:195–202. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hulswit RJG, et al. Human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1 bind to 9-O-acetylated sialic acids via a conserved receptor-binding site in spike protein domain A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:2681–2690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809667116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tortorici MA, et al. Structural basis for human coronavirus attachment to sialic acid receptors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019;26:481–489. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0233-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li Z, et al. Synthetic O-acetylated sialosides facilitate functional receptor identification for human respiratory viruses. Nat. Chem. 2021;2:1598–1608. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00655-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Groot RJ. Structure, function and evolution of the hemagglutinin-esterase proteins of corona- and toroviruses. Glycoconj. J. 2006;23:59–72. doi: 10.1007/s10719-006-5438-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hurdiss DL, et al. Cryo-EM structure of coronavirus-HKU1 haemagglutinin esterase reveals architectural changes arising from prolonged circulation in humans. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4646. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18440-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hulswit RJG, De Haan CAM, Bosch B-J. Coronavirus spike protein and tropism changes. Adv. Virus Res. 2016;96:29–57. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2016.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li F. Receptor recognition mechanisms of coronaviruses: a decade of structural studies. J. Virol. 2015;89:1954–1964. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02615-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang C, et al. Antigenic structure of the human coronavirus OC43 spike reveals exposed and occluded neutralizing epitopes. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:2921. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30658-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Qian Z, et al. Identification of the receptor-binding domain of the spike glycoprotein of human betacoronavirus HKU1. J. Virol. 2015;89:8816–8827. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03737-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ou X, et al. Crystal structure of the receptor binding domain of the spike glycoprotein of human betacoronavirus HKU1. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15216. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wrapp D, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang CY, et al. In situ structure and dynamics of an alphacoronavirus spike protein by cryo-ET and cryo-EM. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4877. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32588-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kirchdoerfer RN, et al. Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein. Nature. 2016;531:118–121. doi: 10.1038/nature17200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pallesen J, et al. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E7348–E7357. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707304114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Walls AC, et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:11157–11162. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708727114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Woo PCY, et al. Comparative analysis of 22 coronavirus HKU1 genomes reveals a novel genotype and evidence of natural recombination in coronavirus HKU1. J. Virol. 2006;80:7136–7145. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00509-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Watanabe Y, et al. Vulnerabilities in coronavirus glycan shields despite extensive glycosylation. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2688. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16567-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Peng G, et al. Crystal structure of bovine coronavirus spike protein lectin domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:41931–41938. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.418210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qing E, et al. Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins in cell entry: control elements in the amino-terminal domains. MBio. 2021;12:e0159021. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01590-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qing E, et al. Inter-domain communication in SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins controls protease-triggered cell entry. Cell Rep. 2022;39:110786. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Eckert DM, Malashkevich VN, Kim PS. Crystal structure of GCN4-pI(Q)I, a trimeric coiled coil with buried polar residues. J. Mol. Biol. 1998;284:859–865. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yin HS, Wen X, Paterson RG, Lamb RA, Jardetzky TS. Structure of the parainfluenza virus 5 F protein in its metastable, prefusion conformation. Nature. 2006;439:38–44. doi: 10.1038/nature04322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Walls AC, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimer. Nature. 2016;531:114–117. doi: 10.1038/nature16988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Punjani A, Rubinstein JL, Fleet DJ, Brubaker MA. CryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:290–296. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Punjani A, Zhang H, Fleet DJ. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:1214–1221. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Punjani A, Fleet DJ. 3D variability analysis: resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 2021;213:107702. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2021.107702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zheng SQ, et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zivanov J, et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife. 2018;7:e42166. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tan YZ, et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:793–796. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sanchez-Garcia R, et al. DeepEMhancer: a deep learning solution for cryo-EM volume post-processing. Commun. Biol. 2021;4:874. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02399-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cianfrocco, M. A., Wong-Barnum, M., Youn, C., Wagner, R. & Leschziner, A. COSMIC2: a science gateway for cryo-electron microscopy structure determination. in Proc. Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2017 on Sustainability, Success and Impact (ed. Hart, D.) 22, 1–5 (ACM, 2017).
- 47.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Afonine PV, et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2018;74:531–544. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318006551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Emsley P, Crispin M. Structural analysis of glycoproteins: building N-linked glycans with coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2018;74:256–263. doi: 10.1107/S2059798318005119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kidmose RT, et al. Namdinator - automatic molecular dynamics flexible fitting of structural models into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps. IUCrJ. 2019;6:526–531. doi: 10.1107/S2052252519007619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Agirre J, et al. Privateer: software for the conformational validation of carbohydrate structures. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015;22:833–834. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dialpuri JS, et al. Analysis and validation of overall N-glycan conformation in Privateer. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2023;79:462–472. doi: 10.1107/S2059798323003510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Williams CJ, et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 2018;27:293–315. doi: 10.1002/pro.3330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Moriarty NW, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD. Electronic ligand builder and optimization workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2009;65:1074–1080. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909029436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Krieger E, Vriend G. YASARA View - molecular graphics for all devices - from smartphones to workstations. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2981–2982. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Maier JA, et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015;11:3696–3713. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kirschner KN, et al. GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. J. Comput. Chem. 2008;29:622–655. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Krieger E, Nielsen JE, Spronk CAEM, Vriend G. Fast empirical pKa prediction by Ewald summation. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2006;25:481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2006.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Essmann U, et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995;103:8577–8593. doi: 10.1063/1.470117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Krieger E, Darden T, Nabuurs SB, Finkelstein A, Vriend G. Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space. Proteins. 2004;57:678–683. doi: 10.1002/prot.20251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Krieger E, Vriend G. New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2015;36:996–1007. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996;14:33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;372:774–797. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Glaser F, et al. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:163–164. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Goddard TD, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 2018;27:14–25. doi: 10.1002/pro.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Winn MD, et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2011;67:235–242. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Krissinel E, Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2004;60:2256–2268. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904026460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Morin A, et al. Collaboration gets the most out of software. Elife. 2013;2:e01456. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The atomic models of the apo, holo, 1-up and 3-up HCoV-HKU1 spike have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the accession codes 8OHN, 8OPM, 8OPN and 8OPO. The globally and locally refined cryo-EM maps have been deposited to the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes EMD-16882, EMD-17076, EMD-17077, EMD-17078, EMD-17079, EMD-17080, EMD-17081, EMD-17082 and EMD-17083. Data files pertaining to molecular dynamics simulation results shown in Fig. 5b and Extended Data Figs. 7–10 are available at 10.5281/zenodo.7867090.