Abstract
The authors present the case of a 39-year-old male who presented to the hospital with worsening eye pain, swelling, and blurred vision of the left eye. His symptoms grew worse despite initial over-the-counter medication and a trip to the urgent care center. A physical exam was concerning for a possible orbital cellulitis given the appearance of the eye and the amount of discomfort, as well as their immunocompromised status, necessitating imaging and workup to confirm the diagnosis. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with periorbital cellulitis and bacterial conjunctivitis, and he received intravenous antibiotics for treatment. This case underscores the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach to managing ocular infections.
Keywords: eye discharge, post septal cellulitis, preseptal cellulitis, orbital cellulitis, periorbital cellulitis
Introduction
Periorbital cellulitis, also referred to as pre-septal cellulitis, is an infection around the eyelid affecting the surrounding skin and tissue in the location anterior to the orbital septum [1, 2]. It is often caused by trauma or sinusitis and rarely leads to severe complications [3]. A similar condition, orbital cellulitis, also known as post-septal cellulitis, presents quite similarly to preorbital cellulitis, which occurs posterior to the orbital septum but is more concerning as it can lead to sight-threatening complications [4,5]. The infection can penetrate the intraconal structures, leading to vascular complications [3]. Signs of orbital cellulitis may include visual loss, ophthalmoplegia, pain in eye movement, and proptosis [3, 5, 6]. By contrast, those diagnosed with periorbital cellulitis often present characteristics of unilateral swelling of the eyelid, superficial pain, erythema, and edema [5]. Common causes of this condition include superficial scratches (trauma) or insect bites around the eye, which eventually lead to infection. It is slightly more prevalent in men and in the spring, likely related to activities that lead to eye trauma [6]. Patients may experience normal to slightly impaired vision and feelings of discomfort when blinking. The common bacteria seen in periorbital cellulitis are Streptococcus pneumonia, Streptococcus anginosus, and occasionally other streptococci and anaerobes [7]. Antibiotics remain the mainstay for ocular bacterial infections.
Case presentation
A 39-year-old Caucasian male presented with a history of eye pain and swelling for two weeks prior to his ED visit. He reported left eye pain, redness, and swelling. He initially used over-the-counter eye drops, which provided temporary relief, but he began having irritation in the eye again three days prior. He denied any eye trauma, insect bites, or food getting stuck in the eye that may have triggered the irritation. He went to an urgent care center two days prior and was prescribed antibiotic eye drops, which he did not obtain. His medical history was significant for mood disorder and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), for which he was taking Descovy® (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide). He was a daily smoker and had no medication allergies.
The patient had normal vital signs: a temperature of 98.4°F, a pulse rate of 76 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 15-18 breaths per minute, and a blood pressure of 133/82 mmHg. He had a normal oxygen saturation of 95% in room air. A physical exam demonstrated 20/20 visual acuity in the right eye but only 20/200 on the left. Left eye examination revealed a matted shunt, photophobia upon assisted opening, and a yellowish eye discharge (Figure 1).
Figure 1. A clinical photograph of the patient's eye.
The pupillary examination did not reveal a relative afferent pupillary defect. Extraocular movements in the left eye caused the patient discomfort. Lateral gaze on the left was limited, likely secondary to swelling. A slit-lamp exam revealed a hazy cornea, chemosis, subconjunctival hemorrhages, and an abundance of mucoid discharge. Due to the haziness of the cornea, the funduscopic exam was unable to be completed. Intraocular pressure in the right eye was 20 cmH2O (normal) and 25 cmH2O on the left (mildly elevated). His neck was supple, without meningismus. The remainder of the physical exam was unremarkable. The laboratory analysis was unremarkable, including a normal white blood cell count. Differential diagnoses included dacryoadenitis, idiopathic orbital inflammation, autoimmune disease, and orbital mass. The patient was admitted to the hospitalist service for broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and imaging of the orbits, as it was not clear from the clinical presentation whether this was periorbital or orbital cellulitis.
An axial CT scan of the orbits was performed without intravenous contrast. Images of the coronal and sagittal reconstruction were obtained, and a radiation dose optimization technique was utilized for this scan. The CT scan demonstrated left periorbital swelling, an intact globe, and no proptosis. The extraocular muscles and optic nerve sheath complexes were unremarkable. The orbital fat was preserved, and there was no mass. There was left periorbital soft tissue swelling with an enhancement consistent with periorbital cellulitis. The examination showed no evidence of orbital cellulitis, abscess, or mass (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Coronal and axial CT views of the orbits; the arrows denote periorbital edema and soft tissue swelling.
Based on the CT result, the patient was diagnosed with periorbital cellulitis and bacterial conjunctivitis due to no evidence of orbital cellulitis. He was given intravenous vancomycin and ceftriaxone. He was continued on Descovy® for HIV prevention. An MRI scan performed three days later confirmed left periorbital soft tissue swelling with enhancement consistent with pre-septal cellulitis (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Coronal and axial MRI views of the orbits; the arrows denote periorbital edema and soft tissue swelling.
The patient was discharged and advised to follow up with the ophthalmology department in three days. He was also advised to follow up with the infectious disease department in one to two weeks to evaluate for further need for antibiotics. At the two-week primary care follow-up, the patient’s symptoms had resolved.
Discussion
The treatment of periorbital cellulitis can vary based on each case and the severity of the condition. It is very important to distinguish periorbital from orbital cellulitis. The septum is the separation between the superficial and deeper structures of the eye; they're also known as pre-septal and post-septal cellulitis, respectively. Pre-septal (periorbital) cellulitis typically does not present with eye pain or vision loss, in contrast to orbital cellulitis.
In this case, our patients had several signs of orbital cellulitis, which was confusing. He also had a history of HIV, which put him at higher risk for infection. For this reason, he was managed conservatively, and dedicated orbital imaging was performed. The physician should consider the medical history and medications that the patient is currently taking before prescribing an antibiotic for periorbital cellulitis [3, 8]. The general recommendation for treatment is clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid due to its efficiency in treatment and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control purposes [1]. An antibiotic with beta-lactam is recommended if the patient is not immunized with Haemophilus influenzae [1, 8]. If an abscess is present, it should be incised and drained. [3].
Conclusions
Pre-septal (periorbital) and post-septal (orbital) cellulitis are two distinct entities that can be differentiated by their anatomical location relative to the orbital septum, clinical presentation, and potential for serious complications. Post-septal cellulitis typically requires intravenous antibiotics and sometimes surgical intervention, whereas pre-septal cellulitis can often be treated with oral antibiotics on an outpatient basis. Sometimes, as in the case of our patient presented here, symptoms can overlap, which can confound the diagnosis. Imaging studies such as CT or MRI are crucial in differentiating between the two in this case.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Latha Ganti, Sarayu Vanga, Murdoc B. Gould, Sidhartha R. Ramlatchan, Anjali R. Daniel
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Latha Ganti, Sarayu Vanga
Drafting of the manuscript: Latha Ganti, Sarayu Vanga, Anjali R. Daniel
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Latha Ganti, Murdoc B. Gould, Sidhartha R. Ramlatchan
Supervision: Latha Ganti
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Bae C, Bourget D. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls [Internet], StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Periorbital Cellulitis. [Google Scholar]
- 2.A case of preseptal cellulitis. Sanfilippo P, Troutbeck R. Clin Exp Optom. 2003;86:250–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Periorbital and orbital cellulitis. Baiu I, Melendez E. JAMA. 2020;323:196. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.A rare cause of periorbital swelling. Leach L, Swords C, Bhat N. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:0. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-224436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Preseptal and postseptal orbital cellulitis of odontogenic origin. Stead TG, Retana A, Houck J, Sleigh BC, Ganti L. Cureus. 2019;11:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.A review of periorbital cellulitis guidelines in fifty-one acute admitting units in the United Kingdom. Okonkwo AC, Powell S, Carrie S, Ball SL. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43:718–721. doi: 10.1111/coa.13020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antibiotic choices for pediatric periorbital cellulitis-a 20-year retrospective study from Taiwan. Shih EJ, Chen JK, Tsai PJ, Lin MC, Bee YS. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022;11:1288. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Improved antibiotic prescribing using indication-based clinical decision support in the emergency department. Goss FR, Bookman K, Barron M, et al. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020;1:214–221. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]