Abstract

Chlorate (ClO3–) is a toxic oxyanion pollutant from industrial wastes, agricultural applications, drinking water disinfection, and wastewater treatment. Catalytic reduction of ClO3– using palladium (Pd) nanoparticle catalysts exhibited sluggish kinetics. This work demonstrates an 18-fold activity enhancement by integrating earth-abundant vanadium (V) into the common Pd/C catalyst. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electrochemical studies indicated that VV and VIV precursors are reduced to VIII in the aqueous phase (rather than immobilized on the carbon support) by Pd-activated H2. The VIII/IV redox cycle is the predominant mechanism for the ClO3– reduction. Further reduction of chlorine intermediates to Cl– could proceed via VIII/IV and VIV/V redox cycles or direct reduction by Pd/C. To capture the potentially toxic V metal from the treated solution, we adjusted the pH from 3 to 8 after the reaction, which completely immobilized VIII onto Pd/C for catalyst recycling. The enhanced performance of reductive catalysis using a Group 5 metal adds to the diversity of transition metals (e.g., Cr, Mo, Re, Fe, and Ru in Groups 6–8) for water pollutant treatment via various unique mechanisms.
Keywords: vanadium, palladium, catalyst, chlorate, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electrochemical study, redox, recycle
Short abstract
Chlorate reduction is substantially accelerated by vanadium redox cycles upon adding VV or VIV salts to Pd catalysts.
Introduction
The global annual production of sodium chlorate (NaClO3) has exceeded 4 million tons for pulp and paper bleaching, pyrotechnics, weed control, and various other applications.1 ClO3– is also a common byproduct from drinking water disinfection using NaClO or ClO22 and wastewater treatment with electrochemical3,4 or photochemical processes.5,6 Upon entering the environment, ClO3– can adversely affect ecosystems. For instance, it exhibits high toxicity toward specific algal species in aquatic environments7 and can potentially suppress the nitrification process in soil.8 Human exposure to ClO3– through drinking water, dairy supply chain, and agricultural products can lead to various health effects, including thyroid dysfunction and methemoglobinemia.9 The World Health Organization,10 European Union (EU),11 and China12 have established the drinking water limit of 0.7 mg L–1 for ClO3–, while the United States has set a health reference level of 0.21 mg L–1, with a minimum reporting level of 0.02 mg L–1.13,14 Additionally, undesired formation of ClO3– also takes place in both essential and emerging electrochemical processes such as chloralkali,15,16 water splitting,17 and seawater valorization.18 Thus, technological advances in chlorate reduction hold immense importance across various fields.
The exploration of platinum group metals (PGM) as catalysts for aqueous ClO3– reduction has been ongoing since the early 1990s.19 While PGM nanoparticles catalyze the clean reduction of ClO3– by H2 into Cl– and H2O (eq 1), they typically demonstrate limited activity, necessitating high catalyst loadings.20−25
| 1 |
Previously, we have enhanced the reduction of oxyanions by incorporating Group 6–8 transition metals into PGM catalysts.26−29 Each secondary metal imparts novel and unique functionalities. For instance, Cr(OH)3 formed in various PGM catalysts (e.g., Pd or Rh nanoparticles supported by carbon, alumina, or silica) remarkably enhanced the adsorption of oxyanions.28 The reduced Mo and Re oxide species on the PGM catalysts substantially accelerated oxyanion reduction via MoIV/VI and ReV/VII redox cycles, respectively.27,30 The immobilization of Ru0 nanoparticles onto Pd/C or Rh/C initiated a synergistic working mode, in which Ru rapidly reduces ClO3– while Pd or Rh scavenges the Ru-passivating chlorine intermediates.29 We were thus motivated by extending the exploration to Group 5 metals.
Vanadium (V) is renowned for its easy accessibility to four adjacent oxidation states ranging from +2 to +5. This feature makes V a versatile redox catalyst and an active participant in various chemical and electrochemical processes.31−33 V is also attractive for application because it is the sixth most abundant element among the transition metals and the 20th most abundant element overall in the Earth’s crust.34 Particularly for environmental application scenarios, V is found in various natural and polluted waters.35−38 In this study, by leveraging the redox property of V and integrating it with a common Pd/C catalyst, we substantially accelerated the reduction of aqueous ClO3–. In contrast to Group 6–8 metals, V exhibits distinct behavior by serving as an electron shuttle in the aqueous phase for ClO3– reduction. After the reaction, reduced VIII can be readily immobilized on Pd/C through pH adjustment. This work shows that simple chemical innovations can substantially enhance the catalyst activity and effectively capture the potentially harmful metal species.
Materials and Methods
General Information
Ultrahigh-purity H2 gas (99.999%) was supplied by Airgas. Activated carbon (no. L11860) for Pd/C preparation, NaVO3, VOSO4, and V2O3 were used as received from Alfa Aesar. NaClO3 and Na2PdCl4 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All aqueous solutions were prepared with 18.2 MΩ cm–1 Milli-Q water. The Pd/C catalyst was prepared using our recently developed all-in situ method, which has been validated in our previous studies.28,29,39,40 Specifically, a magnetic stir bar, 40 mg of activated carbon, 400 mL of DI water, and the desired amount of Na2PdCl4 (dissolved in a stock solution) were sequentially placed in a 500 mL round-bottom flask. The flask was capped with a rubber stopper and sonicated for 1 min. Next, the suspension was stirred at 350 rpm for 5 min to facilitate the adsorption of PdII onto the carbon support. The suspension was then sparged with 1 atm H2 for 5 min at room temperature to reduce adsorbed PdII to Pd0 on the carbon support. The H2 gas was introduced through a 16 gauge stainless-steel needle penetrating the stopper. Another needle served as the sampling port and the gas outlet to a fume hood. The solid catalyst was collected on filter paper in air, dried by airflow in the fume hood, and used for the subsequent steps.
Catalytic ClO3– Reduction
In a 50 mL round-bottom flask, 25 mg of Pd/C and the desired amount of the V precursor (NaVO3 or VOSO4, dissolved in a stock solution) were mixed together with 50 mL of Milli-Q water. The solution pH was adjusted to 3.0 with 1 N (i.e., 0.5 M) H2SO4. The mixture was stirred under H2 sparging for 15 min to ensure the complete reduction of the V precursor to lower oxidation states. Once the V reduction was complete, NaClO3 was added to the flask to initiate the reaction. Aliquots were collected periodically and filtered using a 0.22 μm cellulose membrane. The ClO3– and Cl– in the aliquots were quantified using a Dionex ICS-5000 ion chromatography (IC) with a conductivity detector. The anions were separated using an IonPac AS19 column at 30 °C, with a 20 mM KOH eluent at 1 mL min–1. The dissolved V in the aqueous phase was monitored by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS, Agilent 7700 series).
Characterization of Pd/C-Reduced Vanadium Species
After the NaVO3 addition to the Pd/C suspension and 15 min of H2 sparging, the mixture was promptly transferred to an anaerobic glovebag (98% N2, 2% H2; Coy Laboratories). The ICP-MS analysis indicated limited adsorption of V by Pd/C after H2 exposure (see Results and Discussion). To facilitate X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization, the dissolved V was forced to be immobilized on Pd/C by evaporating the water at 110 °C (sand bath) within the glovebag. The dried powder was mixed with TiO2 (as an internal standard with the Ti 2p3/2 binding energy (BE) of 458.7 eV). The mixture was loaded onto copper conductive tape and placed inside an anaerobic tube. The tube was transferred into a glovebox connected to an XPS instrument (AXIS Supra Kratos Analytical) equipped with a monochromatized Al Kα source. Inside the glovebox, the sample was retrieved from the tube and directly loaded into the instrument for characterization. The XPS spectra were fitted using CasaXPS software (version 2.3.19), with constrained separations of spin–orbit coupling doublet peaks (7.33 eV for V 2p, 5.76 eV for Ti 2p, and 5.27 eV for Pd 3d) and constrained ratios of the doublet peak areas (2:1 for V and Ti 2p and 3:2 for Pd 3d).
To gain further insights into aqueous V speciation under the reducing environment by H2–Pd/C, we employed a combination of rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) techniques and static cyclic voltammetry (CV) to characterize the oxidation states of V species at various reduction potentials. We used a three-electrode system, which included a gold RRDE working electrode, a platinum counter electrode, and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode, following a previously established procedure.41 The electrochemical experiments were performed using NaVO3 and VOSO4 solutions at pH 3.0 (the same pH for ClO3– reduction), with 0.5 M Na2SO4 as the background electrolyte. Prior to the experiments, the V precursor solutions underwent a 30 min purge with N2 gas to remove dissolved O2. Throughout the experiments, a continuous flow of N2 gas was maintained above the solution to prevent the ingress of O2. In the CV experiments, the disk electrode potential was scanned over the range from +0.40 to −1.35 V, with the scan rate ranging from 25 to 200 mV s–1. The disk current was recorded. In the RRDE study, the potential of the disk electrode was scanned within a targeted range, while the ring electrode potential remained fixed at a specific value. The rotating speed of the ring-disk electrode ranged from 400 to 2700 rpm. Both the disk and ring currents were recorded. Details regarding the assignment of V reduction peaks in the voltammograms are provided in Text S1 of the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
Vanadium Substantially Enhances ClO3– Reduction
The addition of either a VV (NaVO3) or VIV (VOSO4) precursor to Pd/C substantially enhanced ClO3–reduction by 18-fold compared to bare Pd/C, with both precursors exhibiting equal activity (Figure 1a and Figure S1). At pH 3.0 and 20 °C, the 1 wt % V–1 wt % Pd/C catalyst at 0.5 g L–1 accomplished >99.9% reduction of 1 mM ClO3– within 0.5 h. We postulated that Pd/C could potentially reduce VV and VIV to the same active species (i.e., VIII or VII, characterized in the next section) for ClO3– reduction. NaVVO3 was used as the catalyst precursor for further studies. To optimize the catalyst formula, we investigated how the varying Pd and V contents affect ClO3– reduction activity using our recently developed method, which allows for the “instant” preparation of Pd/C with any metal content.39 By maintaining a constant V content of 1 wt %, we observed that the increasing Pd content raised the apparent rate constant (Figure 1b). However, surpassing 1 wt % Pd did not result in a proportional acceleration of ClO3– reduction. In fact, the rate constant normalized by the total Pd mass decreased, most likely due to decreased Pd dispersion.29,39 Notably, no ClO3– reduction was observed when Pd was absent (i.e., carbon only, Figure 1b), indicating the role of Pd nanoparticles in harnessing electrons from H2.
Figure 1.
(a) Time profiles of ClO3– reduction by Pd/C added with VV and VIV precursors, relationships between ClO3– reduction rate constants and (b) Pd and (c) V contents of the catalysts, (d) time profiles of ClO3– reduction with V–Pd/C catalysts prepared by allowing various time intervals between adding NaVO3 under H2 and adding ClO3–, (e) chlorine balance during ClO3– reduction, and (f) time profiles of ClO3– reduction by V–Pd/C at various pH. Unless specified, all reactions used 0.5 g L–1 1 wt % V–1 wt % Pd/C, 1 mM ClO3–, pH 3.0, 1 atm H2, and 20 °C.
When the Pd content was fixed at 1 wt % and the V content was progressively increased from 0 to 1 wt %, we observed a proportional increase in the reaction rate. However, beyond 1 wt % V, a disproportional acceleration in ClO3– reduction was observed (Figure 1c). For the subsequent studies, we used 1 wt % for both Pd and V. The highest ClO3– reduction activity was observed when VV–Pd/C was exposed to H2 for 15 min or longer before adding ClO3– (Figure 1d). Shorter H2 exposure (e.g., 5 min) led to a slower reaction. Hence, the reduction of VV by Pd-activated H2 is crucial for ClO3– reduction, and it can be achieved within 15 min at ambient pressure and temperature.
The V–Pd/C ranks among the top-tier catalysts in terms of the ClO3– reduction rate (Table S1). The only catalyst known to exhibit greater activity is our previously reported Ru–Pd/C.29 However, V is a much more earth-abundant and readily available metal than Ru. VV oxyanions are commonly found in natural waters35−38 and may enhance catalysis. A good mass balance was observed between ClO3– and Cl–, indicating that ClO3– was reduced to Cl– without accumulation of Cl-containing intermediates (Figure 1e). At the challenging ClO3– concentrations of 10 and 100 mM, the catalyst exhibited remarkable performance, achieving >99% ClO3– reduction within 4 and 8 h, respectively (Figure S2). We also evaluated the performance of V–Pd/C in synthetic brines containing 2 M Cl– and 1 M SO4– ions, respectively. Despite the observed activity loss in both scenarios, ClO3– reduction still completed within 4 h (Figure S3). Thus, V–Pd/C can be potentially applied to treat concentrated ClO3– under specific scenarios. The activity of V–Pd/C was pH-dependent with faster reactions at lower pH (Figure 1f). Similar trends have been observed from Re–Pd/C and Mo–Pd/C catalysts.27,30,42 The proton can facilitate electron transfer in the deoxygenation of V-coordinated ClO3–27,30,42 and the reduction of the V site to lower oxidation states.43,44
Characterization of Reduced Vanadium Species
ICP-MS analysis revealed that Pd/C had a limited adsorption capacity for VV (Figure 2a). When 1 wt % VV (corresponding to 0.1 mM in solution versus 0.5 g L–1 Pd/C) was added, it was fully adsorbed by Pd/C. However, after a brief H2 exposure, most adsorbed V was released into solution again (Figure 2b). Thus, the reduced V species could not be readily immobilized on Pd/C. To characterize the prevailing oxidation states of V in the H2+Pd/C system, we evaporated the water at 110 °C in an anaerobic glovebag and forced V to deposit on the Pd/C powder. XPS analysis observed the V 2p3/2 BE at 515.6 eV (Figure 2c), which is consistent with the previously reported VIII.45 The BE value also matched the major peak BE at 515.6 eV of the VIII2O3 standard (a minor BE peak at 516.5 eV corresponded to VIV due to oxidation).46 Therefore, the VV precursor was reduced by H2+Pd/C to VIII. XPS also confirmed metallic Pd0 (3d5/2 BE of 335.44 eV, Figure S4) under the H2 atmosphere.
Figure 2.

(a) Fraction of VV adsorbed on Pd/C (0.5 g L–1, 1 wt % VV if fully adsorbed), (b) aqueous V concentration after adding NaVO3 (5 mg L–1 as V) into the Pd/C suspension under varying conditions, (c) V 2p XPS spectra of the VIII2O3 reference and V–Pd/C prepared from NaVO3, and (d) linear sweep voltammetry of VIVO2+ on an RDDE with a scan rate of 50 mV s–1. The ring electrode potential was fixed at 0.8 V. Dashed lines represent the linear sweep voltammetry of the background electrolyte at 50 mV s–1 and 2700 rpm; (e) cyclic voltammetry of VIVO2+ on a gold disk electrode. Dashed lines represent the voltammograms of the background electrolyte at 50 mV s–1. Cyclic scan on the electrode started in the cathodic direction followed by the anodic direction. Other electrochemical study conditions for (d) and (e): 2 mM VOSO4, 0.5 M Na2SO4, 1.5 M ionic strength, and pH 3.0.
To corroborate the XPS results, we used an electrochemical method to investigate the oxidation state of aqueous V after reduction. To simulate the H2+Pd/C system, VV was incrementally reduced on an electrode with a potential range that covered the actual redox potential range of the H2+Pd/C system. The speciation of aqueous VV varies depending on pH and concentration.41,47 Visual MINTEQ simulation (Figure S5) suggested that the dominant species was VO2+ (93.2%) in our optimized reaction system (pH 3.0 and 1 wt % V, equivalent to 0.1 mM V). The fraction of VO2+ decreased as the V concentration increased (Figure S5). To enhance the signal and maintain VO2+ as the main species (>90%), we performed the initial electrochemical study at pH 3.0 with a concentration of 0.2 mM NaVVO3, which was twice the optimum value. CV and RRDE results demonstrated that the reduction of VV started at 0.35 V (Figures S6–S9). We analyzed the correlation between peak currents and scan rates in CV and Koutecky–Levich plots (Text S1, Calculation 1).48 Results showed that VV underwent one-electron transfer to VIV, predominantly as VIVO2+.
However, VIV was not the reactive species responsible for the rapid reduction of ClO3– (see evidence in the next section). When we attempted to further reduce VIV at a more negative potential, the low concentration of V (0.2 mM) failed to generate a notable signal due to the pronounced interference from H2 evolution. Consequently, we used 2 mM VIVOSO4 to further resolve other V species. CV and RRDE analysis (Text S1, Calculation 2) indicated that VIV was initially reduced to VIII within the range of −0.78 V to −0.55 V, prior to H2 evolution, and subsequently reduced to VII at −1.21 V after H2 evolution (Figure 2d,e). Thus, VII cannot be generated by using H2 as the reductant. Therefore, VIII was the final reduction product from VV and was responsible for the rapid reduction of ClO3–. This is consistent with the XPS characterization.
Vanadium Redox Cycles and ClO3– Reduction Mechanisms
Once the V precursor is reduced to VIII, it could rapidly reduce ClO3–. The reaction between VIV and ClO3– could occur, but it was very slow. The homogeneous reaction between VIVO2+ (1 mM) and ClO3– (0.1 mM) was negligible within 0.5 h (Figure 3a,b), which is the time frame for the complete reduction of 1 mM ClO3– using 1 wt % V (0.1 mM)–1 wt % Pd/C (0.5 g L–1, Figure 1a). In stark contrast, the homogeneous reaction between 1 mM VIII (reduced from VV by H2+Pd/C and then separated by filtering off Pd/C) and 0.1 mM ClO3– was observed to reach completion within the same time frame (Figure 3a). Given that the reduction of ClO3– by bare Pd/C is sluggish (Figure 1a), the activity of V–Pd/C is primarily attributed to VIII. According to a previous report, the reaction between VIII and ClO3– predominantly occurs through one-electron transfer, where VIII is oxidized to VIVO2+ and ClO3– is reduced to ClO2.49 Notably, the reported second-order rate constant for ClO3– reduction in the previous homogeneous system (pH ∼0 and 20 °C) was 3.2 M–1 s–1, lower than that from our V–Pd/C system (15.0 M–1 s–1 at pH 3 and 20 °C, Figure 1f). This comparison also shows that integration with H2+Pd/C enables efficient catalysis without highly acidic conditions. The reduction of VIVO2+ to VIII by H2+Pd/C completes redox cycle 1 (Figure 3c). VIII can also react with ClO2 and further intermediates (e.g., ClO2–, ClO–, and Cl2), through one-electron transfer,49 ultimately to Cl– (Figures 1e and 3d).
Figure 3.
(a,b) Time profiles for 0.1 mM ClO3– reduction by 1 mM VIII and VIV, (c) proposed catalytic cycles for the reduction of ClO3– and the reaction intermediates, and (d) overall reaction pathway for the reduction of ClO3– to Cl–.
However, the degradation of those intermediates does not solely use VIII in cycle 1. First, VIVO2+ generated from cycle 1 has substantially higher reactivity with the intermediates compared to ClO3–. For example, the rate constants for the reaction of VIVO2+ with ClO2 and ClO– are 500 and 550 times higher, respectively, than that with ClO3–.49 The reaction of VIVO2+ with these intermediates also follows a one-electron transfer mechanism and yields VVO2+.50 The reduction of VVO2+ to VIVO2+ by H2+Pd/C closes redox cycle 2 (Figure 3c). Second, it is worth noting that while Pd/C is sluggish in reducing ClO3–, it rapidly reduces the intermediates.29 In summary, the reduction of parent ClO3– primarily occurs through cycle 1, yielding ClO2. The degradation of the intermediates (e.g., ClO2, ClO2–, ClO–, and Cl2) can proceed via redox cycle 1 or 2, or they can be directly reduced by Pd/C, eventually generating Cl– (Figure 3d).
Aqueous Vanadium Capture and Reuse
As mentioned earlier, while 0.1 mM VV could be completely adsorbed on the Pd/C, VIII was released into the aqueous phase during the reaction (Figure 2b). To contain the potentially toxic V species in the catalytic system, we aimed to immobilize V onto carbon after the ClO3– reduction. VIII readily hydrolyzes51 and the addition of base (e.g., NH4OH)52 can effectively precipitate VIII(OH)3. Our Visual MINTEQ simulation found that at pH 8.0, over 99% of VIII existed as a VIII(OH)3 solid (Figure 4a). We adjusted the solution pH from 3.0 to 8.0 and achieved the rapid and complete immobilization of VIII onto Pd/C. To prevent VIII oxidation by O2, pH adjustment and filtration were performed under anaerobic conditions. ICP-MS analysis found that the aqueous V went below the detection limit of 1 μg L–1. Although a small portion of VIII may still persist in its hydrolyzed form (e.g., [V(OH)]2+, [V(OH)2]+, and [V2(OH)2]4+), the increased pH can modify the catalyst surface charge to more negative values,24 potentially facilitating the adsorption of those cations. After the pH adjustment, we collected the VIII–Pd/C solid by filtration. The subsequent redispersion into water at pH 3 resumed the high activity (Figure 4b).
Figure 4.
(a) Calculated aqueous VIII speciation (5 mg L–1 as V, Visual MINTEQ ver. 3.1) and (b) reduction of 1 mM ClO3– by fresh and recycled V–Pd/C catalysts. Reaction conditions: 0.5 g L–1 1 wt % V–1 wt % Pd/C, pH 3.0, 1 atm H2, and 20 °C.
Implications to Catalyst Development for Water Treatment
In the aqueous phase, V precursors (NaVVO3 and VIVOSO4) can be efficiently reduced to VIII by Pd-activated H2. The rapid and complete reduction of ClO3– is primarily achieved by the redox cycling between VIII and VIVO2+ as a homogeneous process, but VIII can be effectively contained in the catalytic system via pH control. V is naturally present in a diverse range of earth materials53,54 and can enter the water environment through mechanical and chemical weathering processes.35,36 The global demand for high-grade steel also keeps releasing V-enriched industrial byproducts into the environment.37,38,55−57 Therefore, V from either natural or anthropogenic sources in the affected water could accelerate ClO3– reduction. In the absence of V cocontaminants, the simple addition of 0.1 mM V can substantially facilitate the reduction of up to 100 mM ClO3–. The addition, capture, and recycling of V afford a low-cost and sustainable technical option for ClO3– reduction. The reduction and immobilization of V also suggest a novel approach for V removal from water using PGM catalysts and H2.
Compared to the original Pd/C, the added earth-abundant and low-cost V reduced the amount of expensive Pd/C by 18-fold (Figure 1a) while maintaining the same reaction rate, thus enhancing the cost-effectiveness of the catalyst system. This study demonstrates the great application potential of incorporating redox-active metals to enable new reaction pathways for water pollutant degradation. Our research has investigated various metals in Groups 5 (V), 6 (Cr and Mo), 7 (Re), and 8 (Ru) for enhanced oxyanion reduction with supported PGM catalysts. Each metal follows unique mechanisms through enhancing oxyanion adsorption (e.g., Cr28), creation of novel reaction pathways (e.g., V, Mo,27 and Re30), or synergistic work (e.g., Ru29). Notably, the reaction pathways created by V, Mo, and Re differ remarkably. V reacts with ClO3– through a one-electron transfer process (Figure 3c), whereas Mo and Re oxometallates reduce ClO3– via oxygen atom transfer (eqs 2 and 3).
| 2 |
| 3 |
These findings affirm the opportunities for developing effective and sustainable water technologies with chemical innovation,19 particularly the exploration of the periodic table. Notably, the oxide species of the other two Group 5 metals, niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta), have very different properties from V. For example, NaNbO3 and NaTaO3 are not water-soluble.58 Generating aqueous Nb and Ta species requires excessive acid,59 base,60,61 or complexing agents.62 Thus, integrating Nb and Ta with PGM catalysts via the add-and-use strategy is challenging and warrants future research efforts.
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation (CBET-1932942 for J.G., C.R., and J.L.). Dr. Ich Tran assisted in the XPS characterization performed at the UC Irvine Materials Research Institute (IMRI) using instrumentation funded in part by the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation Program (CHE-1338173).
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c06519.
Comparison with other catalysts; kinetic figures for the effects of V precursors, chlorate concentrations, and common inert anions; XPS spectra; calculated V speciation using Visual MINTEQ; details of electrochemical studies (PDF)
Author Contributions
J.G. conducted kinetic experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript; G.C. and H.L. conducted electrochemical studies; Q.F. conducted kinetic experiments; C.R. assisted in XPS characterization; C.T. measured aqueous V concentrations; J.L. conceived the idea, conducted initial kinetic studies with Y.W., supervised the research, and revised the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Expert Market Research. Global Sodium Chlorate Market Report and Forecast 2023–2028; 2023. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5323457 (accessed October 22, 2023).
- Gorzalski A. S.; Spiesman A. L. Insights on chlorate occurrence, intra-system variability, and source water concentrations. J. AWWA 2015, 107 (11), E613–E626. 10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cho K.; Qu Y.; Kwon D.; Zhang H.; Cid C. m. A.; Aryanfar A.; Hoffmann M. R. Effects of anodic potential and chloride ion on overall reactivity in electrochemical reactors designed for solar-powered wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (4), 2377–2384. 10.1021/es404137u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jasper J. T.; Yang Y.; Hoffmann M. R. Toxic byproduct formation during electrochemical treatment of latrine wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (12), 7111–7119. 10.1021/acs.est.7b01002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qian Y.; Guo X.; Zhang Y.; Peng Y.; Sun P.; Huang C.-H.; Niu J.; Zhou X.; Crittenden J. C. Perfluorooctanoic acid degradation using UV–persulfate process: Modeling of the degradation and chlorate formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (2), 772–781. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albolafio S.; Marín A.; Allende A.; García F.; Simón-Andreu P. J.; Soler M. A.; Gil M. I. Strategies for mitigating chlorinated disinfection byproducts in wastewater treatment plants. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132583 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanwijk D. J.; Hutchinson T. H. The ecotoxicity of chlorate to aquatic organisms: A critical review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1995, 32 (3), 244–253. 10.1006/eesa.1995.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutigoolabud P.; Mizuno T.; Ongprasert S.; Karita S.; Takahashi T.; Obata H.; Senoo K. Effect of chlorate on nitrification in longan plantation soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2008, 54 (3), 387–392. 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2008.00260.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alfredo K.; Stanford B.; Roberson J. A.; Eaton A. Chlorate challenges for water systems. J. AWWA 2015, 107 (4), 187. 10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- WHO Chlorite and Chlorate in Drinking-Water: Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality; WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08/86; World Health Organization, 2005.
- European Union Directive (EU) 2020/2184 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (recast) (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2020, 1– 62. [Google Scholar]
- SAC National standard of the People’s Republic of China: standards for drinking water quality; GB 5749–2022; Standardization Administration of China, 2022.
- EPA Six-Year Review 3 Technical Support Document for Chlorate; EPA-810-R-16–013; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 2016.
- Protection Agency Revisions to the unregulated contaminant monitoring regulation (UCMR 3) for public water systems. Fed. Regist. 2012, 77, 26072–26101. [Google Scholar]
- Karlsson R. K.; Cornell A. Selectivity between oxygen and chlorine evolution in the chlor-alkali and chlorate processes. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (5), 2982–3028. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lakshmanan S.; Murugesan T. The chlor-alkali process: Work in progress. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2014, 16 (2), 225–234. 10.1007/s10098-013-0630-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Park H.; Vecitis C. D.; Hoffmann M. R. Electrochemical water splitting coupled with organic compound oxidation: The role of active chlorine species. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (18), 7935–7945. 10.1021/jp810331w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar A.; Phillips K. R.; Thiel G. P.; Schröder U.; Lienhard J. H. Direct electrosynthesis of sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid from brine streams. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2 (2), 106. 10.1038/s41929-018-0218-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J.; Gao J. Catalytic reduction of water pollutants: Knowledge gaps, lessons learned, and new opportunities. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2022, 17 (2), 26. 10.1007/s11783-023-1626-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Becker A.; Koch V.; Sell M.; Schindler H.; Neuenfeldt G.. Method of removing chlorate and bromate compounds from water by catalytic reduction. European Patent EP0779880B1, 1998.
- Van Santen R.; Klesing A.; Neuenfeldt G.; Ottmann A.. Method for removing chlorate ions from solutions. U.S. Patent 6270682, 2001.
- Kuznetsova L. I.; Kuznetsova N. I.; Koscheev S. V.; Zaikovskii V. I.; Lisitsyn A. S.; Kaprielova K. M.; Kirillova N. V.; Twardowski Z. Carbon-supported iridium catalyst for reduction of chlorate ions with hydrogen in concentrated solutions of sodium chloride. Appl. Catal., A: Gen. 2012, 427, 8–15. 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.03.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J.; Chen X.; Wang Y.; Strathmann T. J.; Werth C. J. Mechanism and mitigation of the decomposition of an oxorhenium complex-based heterogeneous catalyst for perchlorate reduction in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (21), 12932–12940. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X.; Huo X.; Liu J.; Wang Y.; Werth C. J.; Strathmann T. J. Exploring beyond palladium: Catalytic reduction of aqueous oxyanion pollutants with alternative platinum group metals and new mechanistic implications. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 745–752. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ye T.; Banek N. A.; Durkin D. P.; Hu M.; Wang X.; Wagner M. J.; Shuai D. Pd nanoparticle catalysts supported on nitrogen-functionalized activated carbon for oxyanion hydrogenation and water purification. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1 (12), 6580–6586. 10.1021/acsanm.8b01949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J.; Choe J. K.; Sasnow Z.; Werth C. J.; Strathmann T. J. Application of a Re–Pd bimetallic catalyst for treatment of perchlorate in waste ion-exchange regenerant brine. Water Res. 2013, 47 (1), 91–101. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren C.; Yang P.; Gao J.; Huo X.; Min X.; Bi E. Y.; Liu Y.; Wang Y.; Zhu M.; Liu J. Catalytic reduction of aqueous chlorate with MoOx immobilized on Pd/C. ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (15), 8201–8211. 10.1021/acscatal.0c02242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao J.; Zhao Q.; Tan C.; Xie S.; Yin Y.; Liu F.; Liu H.; Chen B.; Liu J. Accelerating catalytic oxyanion reduction with inert metal hydroxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57 (3), 1479–1486. 10.1021/acs.est.2c06468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao J.; Xie S.; Liu F.; Liu J. Preparation and synergy of supported Ru0 and Pd0 for rapid chlorate reduction at pH 7. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57 (9), 3962–3970. 10.1021/acs.est.3c00415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hurley K. D.; Shapley J. R. Efficient heterogeneous catalytic reduction of perchlorate in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (6), 2044–2049. 10.1021/es0624218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langeslay R. R.; Sattelberger A. P.; Marshall C. L.; Kaphan D. M.; Delferro M.; Stair P. C. Catalytic applications of vanadium: A mechanistic perspective. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119 (4), 2128–2191. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galloni P.; Conte V.; Floris B. A journey into the electrochemistry of vanadium compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 301–302, 240–299. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.02.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Choi C.; Kim S.; Kim R.; Choi Y.; Kim S.; Jung H.-y.; Yang J. H.; Kim H.-T. A review of vanadium electrolytes for vanadium redox flow batteries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 263–274. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cotton A. F.; Wilkinson G.; Murillo C. A.; Bochmann M.. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry; Wiley, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Shiller A. M.; Mao L. Dissolved vanadium in rivers: Effects of silicate weathering. Chem. Geol. 2000, 165 (1), 13–22. 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00160-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schlesinger W. H.; Klein E. M.; Vengosh A. Global biogeochemical cycle of vanadium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2017, 114 (52), E11092–E11100. 10.1073/pnas.1715500114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watt J. A. J.; Burke I. T.; Edwards R. A.; Malcolm H. M.; Mayes W. M.; Olszewska J. P.; Pan G.; Graham M. C.; Heal K. V.; Rose N. L.; Turner S. D.; Spears B. M. Vanadium: A re-emerging environmental hazard. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52 (21), 11973–11974. 10.1021/acs.est.8b05560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang B.; Wang S.; Diao M.; Fu J.; Xie M.; Shi J.; Liu Z.; Jiang Y.; Cao X.; Borthwick A. G. L. Microbial community responses to vanadium distributions in mining geological environments and bioremediation assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2019, 124 (3), 601–615. 10.1029/2018JG004670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao J.; Ren C.; Huo X.; Ji R.; Wen X.; Guo J.; Liu J. Supported palladium catalysts: A facile preparation method and implications to reductive catalysis technology for water treatment. ACS ES&T Eng. 2021, 1 (3), 562–570. 10.1021/acsestengg.0c00227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ren C.; Bi E. Y.; Gao J.; Liu J. Molybdenum-catalyzed perchlorate reduction: Robustness, challenges, and solutions. ACS ES&T Eng. 2022, 2 (2), 181–188. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c00290. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen G.; Liu H. Understanding the reduction kinetics of aqueous vanadium(V) and transformation products using rotating ring-disk electrodes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (20), 11643. 10.1021/acs.est.7b02021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren C.; Yang P.; Sun J.; Bi E. Y.; Gao J.; Palmer J.; Zhu M.; Wu Y.; Liu J. A bioinspired molybdenum catalyst for aqueous perchlorate reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (21), 7891–7896. 10.1021/jacs.1c00595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruyère V. I. E.; García Rodenas L. A.; Morando P. J.; Blesa M. A. Reduction of vanadium(V) by oxalic acid in aqueous acid solutions. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 3593–3597. 10.1039/b103320b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Michibata H.; Yamaguchi N.; Uyama T.; Ueki T. Molecular biological approaches to the accumulation and reduction of vanadium by ascidians. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 237, 41–51. 10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00278-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Silversmit G.; Depla D.; Poelman H.; Marin G. B.; De Gryse R. Determination of the V2p XPS binding energies for different vanadium oxidation states (V5+ to V0+). J. Electron. Spectrosc. Related Phenom. 2004, 135, 167–175. 10.1016/j.elspec.2004.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hryha E.; Rutqvist E.; Nyborg L. Stoichiometric vanadium oxides studied by XPS. Surf. Interface Anal. 2012, 44, 1022–1025. 10.1002/sia.3844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boukhobza I.; Crans D. C. Application of HPLC to measure vanadium in environmental, biological and clinical matrices. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13 (1), 1198–1228. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bard A. J.; Faulkner L. R.. Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Cornelius R. D.; Gordon G. Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation of vanadium (III) by chlorate ion, chlorine dioxide, chlorous acid, and hypochlorous acid. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15 (5), 1002–1006. 10.1021/ic50159a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Melvin W. S.; Gordon G. Mechanism of inhibition of the vanadium (IV)-chlorate reaction by chloride ion. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11 (8), 1912–1917. 10.1021/ic50114a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Buglyó P.; Crans D. C.; Nagy E. M.; Lindo R. L.; Yang L.; Smee J. J.; Jin W.; Chi L.-H.; Godzala M. E.; Willsky G. R. Aqueous chemistry of the vanadiumIII (VIII) and the VIII–dipicolinate systems and a comparison of the effect of three oxidation states of vanadium compounds on diabetic hyperglycemia in rats. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44 (15), 5416–5427. 10.1021/ic048331q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King W. R. Jr.; Garner C. S. The exchange of vanadium(II) and vanadium(III) ions in perchloric and sulfuric acid solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74 (14), 3709–3710. 10.1021/ja01134a523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang J.-H.; Huang F.; Evans L.; Glasauer S. Vanadium: Global (bio)geochemistry. Chem. Geol. 2015, 417, 68–89. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Imtiaz M.; Rizwan M. S.; Xiong S.; Li H.; Ashraf M.; Shahzad S. M.; Shahzad M.; Rizwan M.; Tu S. Vanadium, recent advancements and research prospects: A review. Environ. Int. 2015, 80, 79–88. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graedel T. E.; Miatto A. Vanadium: A U.S. Perspective on an understudied metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57 (24), 8933–8942. 10.1021/acs.est.3c01009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao X.; Diao M.; Zhang B.; Liu H.; Wang S.; Yang M. Spatial distribution of vanadium and microbial community responses in surface soil of panzhihua mining and smelting area, china. Chemosphere 2017, 183, 9–17. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S.; Zhang B.; Li T.; Li Z.; Fu J. Soil vanadium(V)-reducing related bacteria drive community response to vanadium pollution from a smelting plant over multiple gradients. Environ. Int. 2020, 138, 105630 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozmen O.; Ozsoy-Keskinbora C.; Suvaci E. Chemical stability of KNbO3, NaNbO3, and K0.5Na0.5NbO3 in aqueous medium. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101 (3), 1074–1086. 10.1111/jace.15291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kanzelmeyer J. H.; Ryan J.; Freund H. The nature of niobium(V) in hydrochloric acid solution1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78 (13), 3020–3023. 10.1021/ja01594a023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy J. H. Sodium-potassium niobates and tantalates. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1961, 20 (1), 53–57. 10.1016/0022-1902(61)80457-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Deblonde G. J. P.; Chagnes A.; Bélair S.; Cote G. Solubility of niobium(V) and tantalum(V) under mild alkaline conditions. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 156, 99–106. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.05.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fairbrother F.; Robinson D.; Taylor J. B. Some water-soluble complexes of pentavalent niobium and tantalum. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1958, 8, 296–301. 10.1016/0022-1902(58)80194-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



