Abstract
The complex structure of the liver and its elaborate hemodynamics can cause hepatic pseudolesions on contrast-enhanced imaging, making the interpretation of diagnostic liver imaging challenging. Aberrant gastric veins are rare; most of their epidemiology data comes from small single-center studies. While current literature suggests that pseudolesions originating from aberrant gastric veins mainly present as hyperdense defects, some cases can also show up as hypodense, as shown in these cases. Differences in flow rates between the portal and aberrant veins and the timing of the scans could explain this contradiction. Identifying aberrant gastric veins on cross-sectional imaging is crucial because they could be misdiagnosed as liver lesions, granting further unnecessary workups or invasive procedures. Aberrant gastric veins can also act as pathways for the spread of gastric cancer. This manuscript presents one aberrant right gastric vein and two aberrant left gastric veins causing hepatic pseudolesions.
Keywords: aberrant liver anatomy, gastric cancer spread, hepatopetal flow, embryology, differential diagnoses, digital drawings, cross-sectional imaging, third inflow, hepatic pseudolesions, aberrant gastric veins
Introduction
The complex structure of the liver, its intricate blood supply with dual inflow, 25% from the hepatic arteries, and 75% from the portal vein, respectively, and the various pathological conditions that can impact liver function can make interpreting diagnostic liver imaging challenging [1]. Moreover, the complex hemodynamics of the liver may result in the appearance of hepatic pseudolesions (HPS) on contrast-enhanced imaging [2]. HPS are focal mass-like abnormalities mimicking actual liver lesions seen only on diagnostic imaging that can be misinterpreted, even by experienced radiologists, granting further unnecessary investigations, like biopsies [1,2].
During the early stages of embryonic development, anastomotic omental veins connect the venous plexus of the primitive foregut to the ductus venosus of Arantius [3]. Normal right and left gastric veins are formed due to the involution of these anastomotic veins; aberrant gastric veins can be formed secondary to the interruption of this physiological process [3].
Usually, gastric veins, which drain blood from the lesser curvature of the stomach, merge with the portal vein, making part of the physiological hepatopetal flow (blood flow toward the liver). Aberrant hepatopetal venous flow, also known as third inflow, may contribute to HPS; third inflow can be caused by an aberrant right gastric vein (ARGV) and, more rarely, by an aberrant left gastric vein (ALGV) [4].
We present three cases of patients with HPS secondary to aberrant gastric veins. Since not all the imaging features of aberrant gastric veins in cross-sectional imaging studies have been widely reported, we present these cases and encourage other authors to report similar cases.
Case presentation
First case
An asymptomatic, 62-year-old woman with a history of a partial gastrectomy with gastrojejunal anastomosis and cholecystectomy underwent an abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to assess a renal angiomyolipoma identified incidentally on a routine abdominal ultrasound. The CT showed an aberrant drainage pattern of the right gastric vein into the liver, causing a hypodense HPS localized at the hepatic segment IVb (Figures 1, 2; Video 1).
Since the patient remained asymptomatic, no further intervention was necessary.
Second case
A 46-year-old woman with a medical history of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) arrived at the emergency department with dull abdominal pain lasting for two months. During the workup, the patient underwent a contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, which incidentally revealed an ALGV, causing a HPS localized at the hepatic segments II and III (Figures 3, 4; Video 2).
Since the ALGV was an incidental finding, the patient was conservatively treated.
Third case
A 50-year-old man with a history of abdominal pain lasting one week underwent a contrast-enhanced abdominal CT, which incidentally revealed an ALGV, causing a small HPS localized at hepatic segment III (Figure 5; Video 3).
The patient's abdominal pain was attributed to IBS after ruling out alternative diagnoses; therefore, he was medically managed and discharged after resolution.
Discussion
Aberrant gastric veins are considered an exceedingly rare finding. Most information regarding their epidemiology comes from small single-center studies. The incidence of ALGV ranges from 0.8%-4%, whereas ARGV is 1.5%-49%, as reported by Kobayashi [2]. In our experience, the three cases reported here are the only ones we have encountered incidentally on cross-sectional imaging studies during our clinical practice.
According to Muñoz and Fraum, the ALGV typically drains into the posterior margins of hepatic segments II and III [5]. At the same time, the ARGV is mentioned to drain more often into the posterior margin of segment IV, consistent with the findings documented in all our cases. It is essential to know that the HPS associated with an aberrant gastric vein typically affects the exact segment the aberrant vein drains into, as shown in our case series.
Elsayes et al. described that the HPS associated with either aberrant gastric vein results in an area of relative hyperenhancement at contrast-enhanced CT and MRI [6]; nonetheless, we have found that although the HPS in our second case matches the description, the HPS of our first and third cases do not, manifesting as a hypodense pseudolesion. This could be explained by the fact that the flow rate through the aberrant gastric vein is typically lower than that of the portal vein. Consequently, during a contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan of the liver, the HPS may not enhance equally as the rest of the liver, resulting in a variable hypodense or hyperdense appearance.
We consider that the hypodense or hyperdense appearance of the HPS in imaging studies depends on the timing of the scan rather than on the intrinsic characteristics of the lesion. Considering these factors carefully when interpreting imaging studies is critical to avoid misdiagnosing and ensure appropriate clinical management.
Some authors have described additional clinical significance for aberrant gastric veins; for example, these could act as an alternative route for venous drainage in hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhotic patients or as a direct metastatic pathway for gastric cancer to the left side of the liver [3,5]. Moreover, it is critical to know this anatomical variation in patients planning for gastric or hepatic surgery since this could be a source of accidental hemorrhage, potentially increasing the time of surgery and morbidity [3,5]. More cases like ours should be reported to increase the available evidence on imaging features of aberrant gastric veins in cross-sectional imaging studies.
Conclusions
Aberrant gastric veins are a rare but relevant finding in cross-sectional imaging, potentially leading to additional imaging studies or biopsies. The density of the HPS caused by aberrant gastric drainage can be variable, ranging from hyperdense to hypodense, depending on the timing of the scan rather than the lesion's intrinsic characteristics.
Encouraging authors to publish more cases like ours is crucial to increasing the available evidence on aberrant gastric vein imaging features in cross-sectional imaging studies.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Alejandro J. Quiroz Alfaro, Andrés Felipe Herrera Ortiz, Rodrigo Borrero León, David F. Torres, Diego A. Aguirre
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Alejandro J. Quiroz Alfaro, Andrés Felipe Herrera Ortiz, Jose D. Cardona Ortegón, Hannah Varney, Rodrigo Borrero León, David F. Torres, Juliana Greiffenstein, Catalina A. Dussan Tovar
Drafting of the manuscript: Alejandro J. Quiroz Alfaro, Andrés Felipe Herrera Ortiz, Jose D. Cardona Ortegón, Hannah Varney, Juliana Greiffenstein, Catalina A. Dussan Tovar
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Alejandro J. Quiroz Alfaro, Andrés Felipe Herrera Ortiz, Jose D. Cardona Ortegón, Rodrigo Borrero León, David F. Torres, Juliana Greiffenstein, Catalina A. Dussan Tovar , Diego A. Aguirre
Supervision: Alejandro J. Quiroz Alfaro, Andrés Felipe Herrera Ortiz, Hannah Varney, Diego A. Aguirre
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Unveiling the unreal: comprehensive imaging review of hepatic pseudolesions. Ramanathan S, Raghu V, Virmani V, Sheikh A, Al Heidous M, Tirumani S. Clin Imaging. 2021;80:439–453. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hepatic pseudolesions caused by alterations in intrahepatic hemodynamics. Kobayashi S. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27:7894–7908. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i46.7894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aberrant left gastric vein: what should surgeons know? Frey S, De Mathelin P, Bachellier P, Addeo P. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44:1247–1250. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-03009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Imaging of aberrant left gastric vein and associated pseudolesions of segments II and III of the liver and mimickers. Unal E, Ozmen MN, Akata D, Karcaaltincaba M. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21:105–110. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aberrant right gastric vein mimicking hepatic spread of prostate cancer on PSMA-PET/CT. Muñoz GC, Fraum TJ. Radiol Case Rep. 2023;18:1140–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.A comprehensive approach to hepatic vascular disease. Elsayes KM, Shaaban AM, Rothan SM, et al. Radiographics. 2017;37:813–836. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]