Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Nov 7;15(11):e48460. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48460

A Comparative Analysis of Complication Rates in Arthroscopic Repair of the Lateral Ankle Ligament and the Brostrom-Gould Technique: A Systematic Review

Ali Alhaddad 1,, Amin G Gronfula 2, Thamer H Alsharif 3, Ahmed Khawjah 4, Norah S Al Shareef 5, Ali A AlThagafi 6, Tawfeeq S Sarraj 7, Ahmed Alnajrani 8
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10703346  PMID: 38074048

Abstract

Injury to the lateral ligament is the most common cause of chronic lateral ankle instability. Lateral ankle instability is usually managed through conservative management, but surgery is indicated if this fails to relieve the symptoms. Surgical repair of the lateral ligament involves many surgical techniques including the arthroscopic repair technique and the modified Brostrom-Gould technique. Due to the minimal research on the complication rates of both techniques, this systematic review aims to establish the complication rates. To obtain articles, a detailed systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed. The articles found using the keywords “arthroscopic,” “Brostrom,” and “Brostrom-Gould” were reviewed by two independent authors. The authors then selected the articles according to our predetermined eligibility criteria. The articles that met our inclusion were then chosen for data extraction. Specific details obtained from the study included the author’s details, the setting of the study, and the complications of the study. The online search yielded 975 articles, but only 44 met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The total sample size for the review was 2041 patients, the modified Brostrom technique was performed on 760 patients while on the remaining 1281 patients, arthroscopic repair was performed. On the characteristics of the sample, the age of the samples ranged from eight years to 83 years, while the mean BMI ranged from 21.0 kg/m² to 25.3 kg/m². The various complication rates included superficial peroneal nerve injury (2.3% in arthroscopic Brostrom and 0.65% in the Brostrom-Gould), wound infections (1.3% in arthroscopic Brostrom and 1.8% in the Brostrom-Gould), persistent pain (1.5% in the arthroscopic Brostrom and 1.1% in the Brostrom-Gould), and lastly recurrent instability (0.31% in arthroscopic Brostrom and 3.0% in the Brostrom-Gould). Overall, the complication rates of the arthroscopic repair were 11.00%, while those of the modified Brostrom-Gould were 10.65%. The study demonstrated that although the arthroscopic technique had higher complication rates than the modified Brostrom technique, the difference was insignificant. Therefore, we concluded that surgeons performing the arthroscopic Brostrom technique should have good arthroscopic skills to minimize complications.

Keywords: lateral ankle ligament instability, arthroscopic repair, complication, brostrom technique, ankle and foot

Introduction and background

Inversion stress to the foot and ankle is a common musculoskeletal injury, especially in athletes who are competing in various levels of sports. The ligaments most frequently damaged are the lateral ankle ligaments, specifically the calcaneofibular ligament and the anterior talofibular ligament [1]. These injuries are among the common causes of ankle instability in athletes. Evidence from research indicates that the rate at which it occurs in both men and women is almost equal [2]. The resulting chronic ankle instability can be classified into mechanical and functional instability. Functional instability is subjective according to the patient and is captured during history taking, while mechanical instability is objective and captured by the clinician during a physical exam [3].

The treatment modalities for chronic ankle instability include conservative management and physical therapy, and failure of both indicates surgery [3]. Conservative management is recommended in patients with symptoms for at least two months [3]. Conservative management involves the standard RICE (rest, ice, compression, and elevation) principles used to manage soft tissue injuries. Additionally, lateral heel wedges, proprioceptive training, peroneal strengthening, bracing and strapping, and lateral heel wedges are among the modalities used in ankle rehabilitation. Achilles tendon stretching and lateral heel wedges prevent hindfoot malpositioning, frequently leaving the lateral ligaments prone to injury [4]. On the other hand, peroneal strengthening and proprioceptive training stabilize the ankle and the hindfoot by improving the maintenance of ankle position when external forces are applied [4-6]. Ankle braces compensate for the instability, but those that provide clinically adequate stability tend to be bulky; hence, they are not routinely used [7]. Rehabilitation exercise forms a critical part of conservative management. They are continued for at least two to three months [8].

Surgery is usually carried out when conservative management fails to provide symptomatic relief. Surgical management is recommended after the patients have not improved after a three to six-month conservative management trial [9]. Various surgical techniques are used to manage chronic instability of the ankle. The methods range from simple repairs to complex reconstructions. The repairs include reattaching or shortening (imbricating) the damaged tissue. Reconstructions, on the other hand, include the replacement of ligaments with graft tissue, either allograft or autologous graft [9]. The reconstructive surgical techniques have evolved from the non-anatomical ones, e.g., Watson-Jones, Castaing, and Snook procedures, to the anatomical ones. Such developments have been due to possible complications of future ankle degeneration due to the non-anatomical forces associated with the non-anatomical techniques. Brostrom proposed the Brostrom technique in 1966 to avoid muscle imbalance by repairing the anterior talofibular ligament (ATLF) using the remnants [10]. Gould further modified this technique in 1980 by reinforcing the extensor retinaculum.

The modified Brostrom-Gould technique is primarily indicated for chronic, recurrent, lateral ankle instability. The method is only performed after the clients have undergone an entire course of physical therapy and failed to improve their symptoms [11]. Preoperative radiological imaging includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which aids in assessing occult pathologies, including peroneal tendon and osteochondral pathologies. Additionally, a computed tomography (CT) scan can be done to get a complete evaluation of the pathology [12].

Hawkins pioneered the arthroscopic technique, which involved repairing the lateral ankle ligament with his stapling approach [13]. The method required two additional portals and ablation of the lateral surface before ligament plication with a staple. The series of 24 patients treated with the process had few complications. These complications were due to the placement of the staple. Kashuk et al. (1994) later developed a suture anchor technique that avoided the difficulties caused by prominent staples [14]. They used an additional accessory anterolateral portal to place suture anchors in the talus or the fibula [14]. Corte-Real and Moreira (2009) later attempted to develop a more reliable arthroscopic ligament repair. Their technique required an accessory anterolateral portal and used only one anchor. The technique had encouraging results as it had only two recurrences. However, the multiple suture passes contributed to slightly increased superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) injury (n = 3) [15]. In 2007, in potentially trying to avoid SPN injury, Acevedo and Mangeno (2015) started using another technique in which they tried to simplify all the prior methods. They used only two standard anterior portals. The technique allowed the placement of two individual suture anchors, which were believed to improve pull-out strengths and stability. Separate passes of sutures engaged a wider surface area, and Acevedo and Mangeno (2015) believed that this potentially avoided potential injury to the SPN [11].

The Brostrom-Gould technique and arthroscopic repair are the two main techniques used to repair lateral ankle injuries. Both techniques have shown effectiveness in restoring ankle stability. However, it is essential to understand the relative safety and occurrence of complications associated with each technique. The complications of the arthroscopic technique include SPN injury, recurrent instability, and unidentified pathology that continues to limit function and cause symptoms [12]. Additionally, the complications of the arthroscopic technique include persistent pain symptoms and postoperative neuritis. The complications' treatment included removing sutures that had trapped the SPN to treat the postoperative neuritis [11]. The postoperative neuritis was self-limiting for other patients, while others had chronic mild postoperative neuritis [11]. The complications of the Brostrom-Gould technique include persistent ankle pain laterally, subtalar laxity when the ankle is dorsiflexed, and wound complications a few weeks postoperatively. Oral antibiotics can treat the complications, or if the infection is severe, surgical debridement may need to be carried out [16].

Based on our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to directly analyze the complication rates of the Brostrom and Gould technique. The primary objective of this study is to compare the complication rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of the lateral ankle ligament and the modified Brostrom-Gould technique. Specifically, the research aims to evaluate the overall complication rates associated with each technique; assess specific complications such as infection, wound healing issues, nerve damage, blood vessel injury, persistent pain, joint stiffness, and the need for additional surgeries; identify potential factors that may contribute to variations in complication rates between the two techniques; and lastly, establish various ways the complications are managed and if there are permanent sequelae of the various techniques.

Review

Methodology

Study Design

This systematic review was prepared by observing and following the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The results were then reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol used was not recorded in any database.

Eligibility Criteria

Two independent reviewers individually reviewed all the articles retrieved from the electronic databases. This was done according to our pre-determined eligibility criteria, which had inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were then selected in the review if they met the following inclusion criteria: (1) studies that compared arthroscopic versus modified Brostrom-Gould technique for lateral ankle ligament repair; (2) studies that reported clinical outcomes such as complications and treatment outcomes; (3) studies that included patients with lateral ankle repair; (4) studies that were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized trials, any primary study, or prospective observational studies; (5) studies that are published in English to minimize translation of scientific words.

The studies were excluded from the review according to the following exclusion criteria: (1) studies that did not report the clinical outcomes; (2) studies that were not published in English; this criterion was essential in avoiding distortion of meaning for scientific terms' translation; (3) articles that were abstracts and lacking the full articles (non-full text), other meta-analyses, or systematic reviews.

Literature Search

Two authors independently conducted a thorough and systematic search for original and peer-reviewed articles. The authors implemented two strategies in their search: the first strategy involved using an outline search criterion on five electronic databases, which included MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search was limited to studies published in English up to July 2023. The search strategy used a combination of keywords related to the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) of interest. The keyword for the population included “lateral ankle ligament.” The keywords for the intervention included “repair,” “open,” “arthroscopic,” “Brostrom,” and “Brostrom-Gould.” The outcomes of interest included “complications,” “treatment,” and “outcome.” The search terms were combined using the Boolean operators “AND,” “OR,” and “NOT,” in various databases as provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Search terms.

The search terms were combined using Boolean operators "AND," "OR," and "NOT."
Database Search terms
PubMed/Embase/Web of Science/Ovid “lateral” OR “ankle” OR “ligament” AND "Brostrom-Gould" OR “Brostrom” "repair" OR "repairing" OR "repairs" OR "open” OR "arthroscoped” OR "arthroscopes" OR "arthroscopes" OR "arthroscope” OR "arthroscopic” OR "arthroscopical” OR "arthroscopically” AND "complicances” OR "complicate” OR "complicated" OR "complicates” OR "complicating" OR "complication” OR "complications" OR “ outcome” "outcomes" “therapeutics” OR "therapeutics" OR "treatments” OR "therapy" OR "therapy” OR "treatment” OR "treatments"

After the eligible studies were obtained, the authors implemented the second strategy. This strategy involved manually searching the lists of references for other eligible studies that had not been identified through the electronic search. This enabled the authors to obtain all the possible articles. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion by the reviewers and a third reviewer.

Quality Appraisal

Two independent reviewers evaluated the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). A study was graded good quality if it had a total rating of 6 or more, fair quality if it had a 3 to 5 rating, and poor quality if it had a 2 or less rating. The results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Quality assessment outcomes of the included studies.

AHRQ: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Author Selection Comparability Outcome AHRQ standard
Letts et al. (2003) [17] 1 0 2 Fair
Li et al. (2022) [18] 1 0 2 Fair
Li et al. (2017) [19] 2 0 3 Fair
Liu et al. (2023) [20] 2 0 3 Fair
Lui (2021) [21] 1 0 2 Fair
Lopes et al. (2018) [22] 3 1 3 Good
Maffulli et al. (2013) [23] 2 0 3 Fair
Matsui et al. (2016) [24] 2 1 3 Good
Mederake et al. (2022) [25] 2 1 3 Good
Molloy et al. (2014) [26] 2 0 3 Fair
Nery et al. (2011) [27] 2 0 3 Fair
Petrera et al. (2014) [28] 2 0 3 Fair
Rigby and Cottom (2019) [29] 2 0 3 Fair
Tan et al. (2023) [30] 2 0 3 Fair
Vega et al. (2020) [31] 2 0 3 Fair
Ventura et al. (2022) [32] 2 1 3 Good
Wang et al. (2023) [33] 2 0 3 Fair
Wang et al. (2023) [34] 2 1 3 Good
Wei et al. (2019) [35] 2 0 3 Fair
Xu et al. (2020) [36] 2 0 3 Fair
Xu and Lee (2016) [37] 1 0 3 Fair
Zeng et al. (2020) [38] 2 0 3 Fair
Zhang et al. (2020) [39] 2 0 3 Fair
Zhou et al. (2021) [40] 2 1 3 Good
Keller et al. (1996) [41] 2 0 3 Fair
Corte-Real and Moreira (2009) [15] 2 0 3 Fair
Kim et al. (2010) [42] 2 0 3 Fair
Lee et al. (2011) [43] 2 0 3 Fair
Buerer et al. (2013) [44] 2 0 3 Fair
Brodsky et al. (2005) [45] 2 0 3 Fair
Ferkel and Charms (2007) [46] 2 0 3 Fair
Acevedo and Mangone (2011) [12] 2 0 3 Fair
Labib and Slone (2015) [47] 2 0 2 Fair
Kocher et al. (2017) [16] 2 0 3 Fair
Chew et al. (2018) [48] 2 0 3 Fair
Hassan et al. (2018) [49] 2 0 3 Fair
Lee et al. (2019) [50] 2 0 3 Fair
Ming et al. (2020) [51] 2 0 3 Fair
Hagio et al. (2020) [52] 2 0 3 Fair
Kanzaki et al. (2020) [53] 2 0 3 Fair
Baek et al. (2023) [54] 2 1 3 Good
Hou et al. (2022) [55] 2 0 3 Fair
Kim et al. (2019) [56] 2 0 3 Fair
Alnejadi et al. (2023) [57] 2 0 3 Fair

Data Extraction and Evaluated Outcomes

The articles that met the inclusion criteria were independently reviewed by two reviewers. The reviewers obtained the relevant data for review. The specific data that were collected from each study included the first author's maiden name and publication year, the study design, the characteristics of the participants (mean age and mean BMI), the type of surgical technique used, the sample size, the mean follow-up period, and the primary outcomes. The primary outcomes included were the complications of the various techniques used.

Results

The online search conducted through various electronic databases stated earlier yielded 975 articles. After careful analysis of these articles, 424 duplicates were identified, which the reviewer excluded from the study. The reviewers then screened the remaining 551 articles’ abstracts and titles; all 551 met the screening criteria, and the reviewers could not retrieve 415 articles. The remaining 139 were now screened using the pre-determined eligibility criteria. After the assessment, 40 articles were excluded because they were not published in English, 48 articles were reviews and meta-analyses, hence excluded, and two others were excluded because they were letters to the editor. The final articles to be included were 44, which met all our inclusion criteria. The results of the search are shown using the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram .

Figure 1

PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Various surgical techniques were used in the studies, including the arthroscopic Brostrom technique and the modified Brostrom-Gould technique. Only the results of the complication rates of the arthroscopic Brostrom technique and modified Brostrom-Gould technique were included in comparative studies where various methods were used in lateral ankle repair. The study's total patient sample had 2041 patients; 760 patients underwent the modified Brostrom-Gould procedure, while the remaining 1281 patients underwent arthroscopic Brostrom repair. The complication rates varied from no complication rates in some case studies and case reports to as high as 27% complication rates in some studies. The complications of the various techniques included superficial wound infection, SPN and sural nerve injuries, knot pain, recurrent instability of the ankles, persistent pain, neuromas, and suture knot granulomas, among others. The various complication rates for the two techniques are displayed in Table 3.

Table 3. The complication rates of the two surgical techniques.

Complication Arthroscopic Brostrom Modified Brostrom-Gould
Superficial peroneal nerve injury 2.3% 0.65%
Wound infection 1.3% 1.8%
Persistent pain 1.5% 1.1%
Recurrent instability 0.31% 3.0%
Other complications 5.59% 4.1%
Overall complication rate 11.00% 10.65%

The characteristics of the various studies have been displayed in Table 4.

Table 4. Study characteristics.

AB: arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould technique; OB: open Broström-Gould technique; AS group: arthroscopic Broström–Gould repair group; SPN: superficial peroneal nerve; AOFAS: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society.

Author Country Type of study Study characteristics Sample size Surgical technique Follow-up time Primary outcomes
Letts et al. (2003) [17] Canada Retrospective review Average age = 14 years and three months 12 Brostrom technique Average 3 years 1 month Only 1 child (8.3%) had an unstable ankle after treatment.
Li et al. (2022) [18] China Retrospective review Mean age = 30.17 years 29 Arthroscopic repair 18.66 ± 4.85 months 8 patients (27.5%) had malleolar avulsion fractures, and 10 had talus cartilage injury.
Li et al. (2017) [19] China Cohort study Mean age = 30.3 ± 10.1 years, mean BMI = 23.3 ± 2.9 kg/m² 6l Arthroscopic repair 2 years One patient (4.3%) had no improvement in the functional scores due to an osteochondral defect in the medial talus.
Liu et al. (2023) [20] China Retrospective review Mean age = 35 (16-60) years 39 Arthroscopic Brostrom 22 months 2 patients (5.1%) had superficial peroneal nerve irritation symptoms. 3 patients (7.7%) had mild pain anteroinferior to the lateral ankle.
Lui (2021) [21] China Case report   1 Arthroscopic Brostrom 2 years The patient had no complications.
Lopes et al. (2018) [22] France Prospective cohort Mean age = 32.4 (12-67) years, mean BMI = 24.9 (18-52) kg/m² 286 Arthroscopic repair 9.6 months 4.2% of patients had infectious complications, 10% had neurological complications, and 3.5% had a neuroma.
Maffulli et al. (2013) [23] United Kingdom Case series   38 Ankle arthroscopy and Brostrom repair 8.7 years 11% (4) of patients developed surgical complications. 1 (3%) had a superficial wound infection that healed. 3 had sensory disturbance of the lateral foot aspect, which was self-limiting.
Matsui et al. (2016) [24] Japan Retrospective cohort Mean age = 28 years (8-59 years) 37 Arthroscopic repair 1 year 2 (5.4%) patients had temporary numbness of SPN, while 3 (8.1%) had wound irritation.
Mederake et al. (2022) [25] Germany Retrospective cohort Median age = 35 years (17-54) years 14 Arthroscopic Brostrom 1 year 14% of patients had complications. 1 (7%) had a suture granuloma, while 1 (7%) had nerve damage.
Molloy et al. (2014) [26] United Kingdom Prospective cohort Mean age = 33 (20-46 years) 18 Modified Brostrom-Gould 25 months One patient (5.6%) had scar tenderness due to a palpable suture.
Nery et al. (2011) [27] United Kingdom Case series Mean age = 28.8 years 38 Brostrom-Gould 9.8 years 2 patients (5.3%) had low AOFAS scores.
Petrera et al. (2014) [28] Canada Cohort study Mean age = 25 (18-37) years 55 Modified Brostrom repair 42 months There was a 6% failure rate. 3 (5.5%) patients had a traumatic retear that resulted in residual instability. 2 (3.6%) patients had superficial wound infection. Temporary neurapraxia of SPN was reported in one of the patients.
Rigby and Cottom (2019) [29] United States Retrospective study Mean age = 47.89 (14-83) years 62 Modified Brostrom-Gould 3.7 years 2 patients (6.5%) reported superficial peroneal neuritis.
Tan et al. (2023) [30] Singapore Retrospective study Mean age = 34.6 (19-61) years 42 Modified Brostrom-Gould surgery 2.6 years 2 patients (4.8%) suffered exercise-induced ankle sprains.
Vega et al. (2020) [31] Spain Cohort study Median age = 41 (22-56) years 24 Arthroscopic all-in-repair 35 months 2 (8.3%) patients had symptomatic arthrofibrosis of the anterior ankle. 1 patient (4.2%) had SPN neuralgia and numbness. 2 patients had delayed anteromedial portal healing. 1 patient (4.2%) complained of discomfort in the lateral ankle.
Ventura et al. (2022) [32] Italy Retrospective study The study did not provide sample characteristics 18 Arthroscopic Brostrom technique 4 years 2 (11%) patients had complications. The complications were SPN injury in 1 case (5.5%) and another (5.5%) of persistent pain near a suture knot.
Wang et al. (2023) [33] China Prospective cohort In the arthroscopic group, the mean age was 28.6 ± 8.1 years, and the mean BMI was 22.9 ± 5.1 kg/m²; in the open group, the mean age was 27.2 ± 7.7 years and the mean BMI was 22.9 ± 5.1 kg/m² 32 arthroscopic, 32 Brostrom-Gould Arthroscopic Brostrom and open ± Brostrom-Gould 11.25 months 1 patient (3.2%) in the open group and 2 patients (6.4%) in the Brostrom-Gould had dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) restriction.
Wang et al. (2023) [34] China Retrospective review The mean age of the patients of AB was 31.71 ± 4.99 and OB was 31.92 ± 4.77. The mean BMI for AB was 21.84 ± 2.40 kg/m² while for OB was 22.38 ± 2.29 kg/m² AB = 49 and OB = 50 Arthroscopic Brostrom and Brostrom-Gould method 48 months Arthroscopic Brostrom had higher complications (16.3%) compared to the Brostrom-Gould technique (14%). Arthroscopic Brostrom had 8 patients; 6 patients (12.2%) had SPN injury, and 2 (4.1%) had superficial wound infection. In Brostrom-Gould, 7 patients had complications: 2 had SPN injuries and 5 had superficial wound infections.
Wei et al. (2019) [35] China Cohort study The average age was 34.3 ± 10.3 years, and 11 were smokers 29 patients All inside arthroscopic repair 33.7 months There were only 3 cases (10.3%) of irritation of the suture knot site. 2 (6.9%) patients had an additional ankle sprain.
Xu et al. (2020) [36] China Retrospective study Age = 33.7 ± 7.0 years; BMI = 23.3 ± 2.3 32 patients All arthroscopic repair 24 months 3 patients (9.4%) had SPN injury, while an additional 2 patients (6.2%) had knot pain.
Xu and Lee (2016) [37] Korea Cohort study 52 were below 33 years, while 48 were above 33 years. 54 had a BMI of less than 24, while 46 had a BMI above 24 100 patients Modified Brostrom procedure 43.3 months There were 11.4% major complications, which were ruptures and recurrent lateral ankle instability complication rates in the laxity group and 1.8% in the non-laxity group. 5 cases of failure were reported in the laxity group, i.e., Beighton scores < 9. The rate of minor complications was 6.8% (3) and 8.9% (5 patients) in the laxity and non-laxity groups, respectively. These included superficial infections, ankle range of motion loss, and sural nerve irritation. Four patients had reduced sagittal ankle plane motion. 3 patients had superficial wound infections, and 1 had a sural nerve injury.
Zeng et al. (2020) [38] China Retrospective cohort Mean age = 29.7 ± 7.6 years, mean weight = 69.9 ± 11.2 kg 27 patients, 10 = OB, 17 = AB Open Brostrom technique and arthroscopic surgery 3 years In the open group, there was poor healing in 2 patients (20%) and a painful nodule in 1 patient (10%). In the arthroscopic group, there was 1 (5.9%) patient with poor healing and 1 patient (5.9%) with nerve injury.
Zhang et al. (2020) [39] China Retrospective cohort Mean age = 32.4 ± 2.4 years, BMI = 24.6 ± 3.4 28 Arthroscopic reconstruction 24 months 2 patients (7.14%) had SPN injury and 1 patient (3.6%) had sural nerve injury. There was additional skin irritation in 2 patients.
Zhou et al. (2021) [40] China Retrospective cohort Mean age = 33.42 ± 6.40 years, mean BMI = 24.42 ± 1.87. 31 patients Arthroscopic repair and modified Brostrom-Gould 2 years In the arthroscopic group, complications included 1 case (3.23%) of SPN neuritis, and 1 patient (3.23%) had recurrent instability. In the open Gould technique, the complications included 2 patients (5.56%) who had recurrent instability, 1 patient (2.78%) who had lateral ankle sensory disturbance, and 1 patient (2.78%) who had mild skin irritation.
Keller et al. (1996) [41] United States of America Clinical study Mean age = 33.8. 44 patients Brostrom-Gould procedure 2.6 years Two patients (4.5%) had small, uncomplicated wound dehiscence at the apex of the incision, 6 patients (13.66%) had edema, and 1 patient (2.3%) had continued pain, stiffness, and recurrent sprains.
Corte-Real and Moreira (2009) [15] Portugal Retrospective case study Not provided 28 patients Arthroscopic repair 24.5 months 9 patients (29%) had complications, 3 (9.6%) had persistent problems. 2 (7.2%) patients had delayed wound healing, 3 (9.6%) had SPN numbness, and 1 (3.6%) had deep venous thrombosis.
Kim et al. (2010) [42] Korea Retrospective comparative study Mean age = 26.2 ± 9.1 ossicle group, 28.4 ± 10.4 69 patients Modified Brostrom technique 47 months 2 patients (7.7%) had recurrent ankle sprains; in another group, two patients (7.7%) had recurrent instability.
Lee et al. (2011) [43] Korea Retrospective case series Mean age = 23.0 ± 5.3 30 patients Modified Brostrom 10.6 years They did not report any complications.
Buerer et al. (2013) [44] Switzerland Retrospective cohort Mean age = 33.7(18-60) years, mean BMI = 24.69 kg/m² (18.99-33.46 kg/m²) 41 patients Modified Brostrom-Gould procedure 13-72 months 3 patients (7.3%) had complications, 1 (2.4%) had perimalleolar pain, 1 (2.4%) had persistent numbness of the ankle, and 1 (2.4%) had pain and discomfort in the area of the scar.
Brodsky et al. (2005) [45] USA Retrospective Mean age = 31 (15-61) years 73 patients Modified Brostrom-Gould procedure 64 months 1 patient (1.4%) had a superficial ulcer on the fifth metatarsal head, 1 (1.4%) had reflux sympathetic dystrophy, and 1 (1.4%) had tibial sesamoiditis.
Ferkel and Charms (2007) [46] USA Retrospective Mean age = 28 (13-61) years 21 patients Modified Brostrom-Gould 60 months 3 patients (14.3%) had traumatic sprains after surgery.
Acevedo and Mangone (2011) [12] USA Retrospective Average age = 39 (15-55) years 23 Arthroscopic lateral ankle reconstruction 10.9 months 1 patient (4.3%) had a neurological problem and proximal muscle weakness, 1 patient (4.3%) had peroneal tendonitis, and 1 patient (4.3%) had sural nerve neuritis.
Labib and Slone (2015) [47] USA Retrospective Not provided 14 patients Arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould repair 3 months 2 patients (14.2%) were still experiencing some pain.
Kocher et al. (2017) [16] USA Retrospective Mean age = 14.9 ± 2.7 years 31 patients Brostrom procedure 36.2 months 1 patient (3.2%) had persistent pain; 2 patients (6%) had wound complications.
Chew et al. (2018) [48] Singapore Retrospective Mean age = 24.13 (range = 18-42) years 24 Modified Brostrom-Gould procedure 28.7 months The study did not report any complications.
Hassan et al. (2018) [49] UK Retrospective Mean age = 30.1 (range 15.8-47.4) years 27 Modified Brostrom technique 5 years 1 patient (3.7%) complained of pain at the site of the scar.
Lee et al. (2019) [50] Korea Case report 34 years 1 Arthroscopic modified Brostrom technique 6 months The patient had severe pain on the lateral aspect of the right ankle.
Ming et al. (2020) [51] China Retrospective Mean age = 32.17 ± 6.35 years, mean BMI = 22.69 ± 5.13 kg/m² 37 patients Arthroscopic anatomical repair 33.16% ± 10.58 months The study did not have any complications.
Hagio et al. (2020) [52] Japan Retrospective comparative study Mean age = 28 (12-66) years 47 patients Arthroscopic lateral ankle repair 14 months The study did not report any complications.
Kanzaki et al. (2020) [53] Japan Case series Mean age = 30.0 years 47 patients Arthroscopic lateral ankle repair 21 months 1 patient (2.1%) had residual joint pain due to residual osteophytes, 2 patients (4.2%) had scar pain, and 1 patient (2.1%) had SPN irritation and a positive Tinel sign.
Baek et al. (2023) [54] Korea Retrospective case cohort Mean age = 22.0 ± 4.0 years. The mean BMI in the AS group was 25.2 ± 3.6 kg/m² and in the open group was 24.1 ± 3.6 kg/m² 31 patients in the AS group, 34 patients in the open group Arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould technique and open Brostrom-Gould repair 50.8 months One patient (3.2%) in the AS group had transient damage to the SPN.
Hou et al. (2022) [55] China Randomized controlled trial Mean age = 28.3 ± 5.4, mean BMI = 21.0 ± 3.1 36 patients Arthroscopic Brostrom procedure 2 years One patient (2.8%) complained of joint instability.
Kim et al. (2019) [56] Korea Retrospective comparative study Mean age = 36.1 ± 14.5 years 133 patients Arthroscopic modified Brostrom procedure 12 months 2 patients (1.6%) developed SPN injury, 1 patient (0.8%) had knot pain, and 1 (0.8%) had an abscess.
Alnejadi et al. (2023) [57] Saudi Arabia Case series Mean age = 36 years, mean BMI = 37.7 kg/m² 8 patients Modified Brostrom technique 1 year 2 patients (25%) had persistent pain. After 1 year of follow-up.

The characteristics of the sample populations included the mean age and mean body mass index (BMI) where one was provided. The minimum age in the included studies was eight years, and the maximum age was 83 years. The mean BMI ranged from 21.0 kg/m² to 25.3 kg/m². One study provided the mean weight, which was 69.9 kg. The mean BMI ranged from 21.0 kg/m² to 25.3 kg/m².

Discussion

This systematic review discussed the complication rates of various studies on the arthroscopic Brostrom technique and the modified Brostrom-Gould technique. The most important finding in the arthroscopic Brostrom technique was that complication rates ranged from 0% in some studies to 29% in other studies [15,51,52]. For the modified Brostrom-Gould technique, on the other hand, the complication rates ranged from 0% complication rates in some studies to 30% complication rates in others [38,48]. The absolute mean complication rate of the studies reviewed for the modified Brostrom-Gould procedure is 10.65%, while the one for the arthroscopic repair is 11.00%. The complication rates in the arthroscopic Brostrom repair were higher than those of modified Brostrom-Gould but not significantly. These results are similar to those of a systematic review by Brown et al. (2018), who reported higher complication rates in the arthroscopic Brostrom technique (11.5%) compared to 5.4% in the Brostrom-Gould technique [58]. Additionally, the rates of complications of arthroscopic Brostrom procedure are similar in both reviews. However, the rates of complication in the modified Brostrom-Gould technique in our systematic review (10.65%) are slightly higher compared to those of Brown et al. (2018) (5.4%), and this may be attributed to our large sample size, which improved the statistical ability of our review [58].

Regarding specific complications, cases of SPN injury and neuritis were reported among various studies and across all the techniques. The rate of SPN injury in modified Brostrom techniques was minimal at a rate of 0.65%, while that of the arthroscopic Brostrom repair was higher with the rate of SPN injury at 2.3% of the sample of patient’s studies. The higher complication rates of SPN injury associated with the arthroscopic Brostrom technique are similar to those reported by Wang et al. (2014), who reported that SPN injuries are frequently reported complication in the studies they reviewed [59]. To aid in minimizing this risk, Acevedo and Mangone (2015) further recommended that the orthopedic surgeons performing the procedure must possess a profound knowledge of the ankle and foot anatomy and have excellent arthroscopic skills [11]. Vega et al. (2013) further add that surgeons should be cautious when creating portals, inserting the instruments, and carrying out the procedure, as this minimizes the risk of nerve injuries [60].

Infectious complications postoperatively are common. In both groups, wound infection and healing difficulties were reported. The rates of infectious complications in the arthroscopic group were 1.3%, while those in the modified Brostrom group were 1.8%. Most infections were self-limiting, while others had to be treated with antibiotics. The pathogens observed to cause the infections included pseudomonas and Peptostreptococcus species, seen in wound cultures [16]. The treatment regimen consisted of clindamycin or cephalexin. In severe cases, some wounds had to undergo irrigation and surgical debridement. All the cases of wound infection reported were successfully managed, and residual infection existed.

The arthroscopic repair was initially developed as a minimally invasive procedure, and its use has become popular as it reduces recovery pain and postoperative pain. Another complication reported was postsurgical pain. The pain ranged from one caused by nerve irritation to another caused by knot irritation. The rates of surgical pain caused included 1.1% in the Brostrom-Gould group and 1.5% in the arthroscopic Brostrom technique. Some of the pain was self-limiting and subsided on its own, some were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs while other types became recurrent and persistent [40].

Other complications were recurrent instabilities after the procedures. The rate of recurrent instability was lower in the arthroscopic Brostrom repair (0.31%) compared to the modified Brostrom-Gould technique (3.0%). The rate of recurrent instability of the modified Brostrom technique is less than that reported by Lewis et al. (2021), i.e., 9.28% [61]. The authors attributed these phenomena to the patients resuming their activities, as most of the injuries were a result of postoperative injuries. The patients were placed on conservative management without the need for revision surgery [28]. Additionally, Zhou et al. (2021) recommended that they wear ankle pads during exercises for additional protection. The instability did not provide a significant disturbance in their activities of daily living [40].

Limitations of the study

One of the limitations of this study is that some of the included studies have small sample sizes. The drawback contributed to the small sample size for the specific complications of the various techniques. Although our sample size and included studies are slightly larger than the one for other systematic reviews, the specific sample sizes of the various individual complications were limited, and we would recommend that future studies focus on the specific complications and assess their rates for each of the procedures. Another limitation was on the characteristics of the included populations; hence, we could obtain only the mean age for the various studies. This reduced our ability to relate the complication rates to the sample populations' various characteristics.

Conclusions

This systematic review established that the rate of complications is higher in the arthroscopic repair compared to the modified Brostrom-Gould procedure. The wound infection rate was, however, higher in the modified Brostrom-Gould group than in the arthroscopic group. The rate of injuries to the SPN was higher in the arthroscopic group compared to the Brostrom-Gould group; hence, we recommended that caution be observed by surgeons who are operating and also the surgeons who possess good arthroscopic skills before performing the procedure. In summary, the difference between the complications of the Brostrom-Gould and arthroscopic repair procedures was insignificant; hence, we can conclude that both procedures are productive in avoiding complications. We recommend that future systematic reviews be conducted to compare the two techniques regarding specific complications.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Amin G. Gronfula, Ali Alhaddad, Ali A. AlThagafi, Thamer H. Alsharif, Ahmed Khawjah, Tawfeeq S. Sarraj, Ahmed Alnajrani, Norah S. Al Shareef

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Amin G. Gronfula, Ali Alhaddad, Ali A. AlThagafi, Thamer H. Alsharif, Ahmed Khawjah, Tawfeeq S. Sarraj, Ahmed Alnajrani, Norah S. Al Shareef

Drafting of the manuscript:  Amin G. Gronfula, Ali Alhaddad, Ali A. AlThagafi, Thamer H. Alsharif, Ahmed Khawjah, Tawfeeq S. Sarraj, Ahmed Alnajrani, Norah S. Al Shareef

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Amin G. Gronfula, Ali Alhaddad, Ali A. AlThagafi, Thamer H. Alsharif, Ahmed Khawjah, Tawfeeq S. Sarraj, Ahmed Alnajrani, Norah S. Al Shareef

Supervision:  Ahmed Alnajrani

References

  • 1.Associated injuries found in chronic lateral ankle instability. DIiovanni BF, Fraga CJ, Cohen BE, Shereff MJ. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:809–815. doi: 10.1177/107110070002101003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. Hertel J. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC164367/ J Athl Train. 2002;37:364–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chronic ankle instability: current perspectives. Al-Mohrej OA, Al-Kenani NS. Avicenna J Med. 2016;6:103–108. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.191446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Instability of the subtalar joint. Clanton TO. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2677894/ Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:583–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Treatment of ankle sprains in young athletes. Smith RW, Reischl SF. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14:465–471. doi: 10.1177/036354658601400606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The effect of external ankle support in chronic lateral ankle joint instability. An electromyographic study. Karlsson J, Andreasson GO. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:257–261. doi: 10.1177/036354659202000304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Subtalar instability: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Keefe DT, Haddad SL. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002;7:577–609. doi: 10.1016/s1083-7515(02)00047-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lateral ankle sprains: a comprehensive review part 2: treatment and rehabilitation with an emphasis on the athlete. Safran MR, Zachazewski JE, Benedetti RS, Bartolozzi AR 3rd, Mandelbaum R. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:0–47. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199907001-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Surgical management of lateral ankle instability in athletes. Camacho LD, Roward ZT, Deng Y, Latt LD. J Athl Train. 2019;54:639–649. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-348-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Open and arthroscopic lateral ligament repair for treatment of chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. Guelfi M, Zamperetti M, Pantalone A, Usuelli FG, Salini V, Oliva XM. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arthroscopic brostrom technique. Acevedo JI, Mangone P. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:465–473. doi: 10.1177/1071100715576107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Acevedo JI, Mangone PG. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;10:111–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arthroscopic stapling repair for chronic lateral instability. Hawkins RB. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2960443/ Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987;4:875–883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Arthroscopic lateral ankle stabilization. Kashuk KB, Landsman AS, Werd MB, Hanft JR, Roberts M. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7954209/ Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11:407–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arthroscopic repair of chronic lateral ankle instability. Corte-Real NM, Moreira RM. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:213–217. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Efficacy of the modified Broström procedure for adolescent patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. Kocher MS, Fabricant PD, Nasreddine AY, Stenquist N, Kramer DE, Lee JT. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37:537–542. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Surgical management of chronic lateral ankle instability in adolescents. Letts M, Davidson D, Mukhtar I. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12724608/ J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:392–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair with internal brace and lasso-loop technique for chronic ankle lateral instability. Li D, Tang Q, Liu Q, et al. Int Orthop. 2022;46:2821–2828. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05541-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Activity level and function 2 years after anterior talofibular ligament repair: a comparison between arthroscopic repair and open repair procedures. Li H, Hua Y, Li H, Ma K, Li S, Chen S. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:2044–2051. doi: 10.1177/0363546517698675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mid-term follow-up evaluation of a new arthroscopic Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Liu Z, Lu H, Yuan Y, Fu Z, Xu H. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:316. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03789-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Concomitant lateral ankle and peroneal tendon instability treated with simultaneous arthroscopic broström and tendoscopic superior peroneal retinaculum repair: a case report. Lui TH. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60:850–855. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Arthroscopic treatment of chronic ankle instability: prospective study of outcomes in 286 patients. Lopes R, Andrieu M, Cordier G, et al. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104:0–205. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Isolated anterior talofibular ligament Broström repair for chronic lateral ankle instability: 9-year follow-up. Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Maffulli GD, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G, Denaro V. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:858–864. doi: 10.1177/0363546512474967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Early recovery after arthroscopic repair compared to open repair of the anterior talofibular ligament for lateral instability of the ankle. Matsui K, Takao M, Miyamoto W, Matsushita T. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:93–100. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2342-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arthroscopic modified Broström operation versus open reconstruction with local periosteal flap in chronic ankle instability. Mederake M, Hofmann UK, Ipach I. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:3581–3588. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03949-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The modified Broström-Gould procedure--early results using a newly described surgical technique. Molloy AP, Ajis A, Kazi H. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20:224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arthroscopic-assisted Broström-Gould for chronic ankle instability: a long-term follow-up. Nery C, Raduan F, Del Buono A, Asaumi ID, Cohen M, Maffulli N. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:2381–2388. doi: 10.1177/0363546511416069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Short- to medium-term outcomes after a modified Broström repair for lateral ankle instability with immediate postoperative weightbearing. Petrera M, Dwyer T, Theodoropoulos JS, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1542–1548. doi: 10.1177/0363546514530668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.A comparison of the "All-Inside" arthroscopic Broström procedure with the traditional open modified Broström-Gould technique: a review of 62 patients. Rigby RB, Cottom JM. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.07.642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.The outcome of modified mini-open Brostrom Gould ankle surgery on chronic ankle instability. Tan A, Chan M, Kon Kam King C, Chandrakumara D, Socklingam R. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arthroscopic all-inside ATFL and CFL repair is feasible and provides excellent results in patients with chronic ankle instability. Vega J, Malagelada F, Dalmau-Pastor M. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:116–123. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05676-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Management of isolated anterior talofibular ligament lesion in patients suffering from chronic ankle instability: comparison of two minimally invasive surgical techniques. Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Macchi V, Borgo E, Legnani C. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26:2944–2948. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202204_28625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arthroscopic modified Broström procedure achieved similar favorable short term outcomes to open procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability cases with generalized joint laxity. Wang AH, Su T, Jiang YF, et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:4043–4051. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07431-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Arthroscopic vs. open Broström-Gould for repairing anterior talofibular ligament: mid-term outcomes comparison. Wang J, Tang Z, Sun H, Lv J, Jiang H, Yue Y. Front Surg. 2023;10:1181493. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1181493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clinical outcomes of a modified all-inside arthroscopic repair of anterior talofibular ligament for chronic ankle instability: a preliminary report. Wei S, Liu S, Han F, Xu F, Cai X. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.A comparison between arthroscopic and open surgery for treatment outcomes of chronic lateral ankle instability accompanied by osteochondral lesions of the talus. Xu C, Li M, Wang C, Liu H. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:113. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01628-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Modified Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability in patients with generalized joint laxity. Xu HX, Lee KB. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:3152–3157. doi: 10.1177/0363546516657816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Open Broström-Gould repair vs arthroscopic anatomical repair of the anterior talofibular ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability. Zeng G, Hu X, Liu W, Qiu X, Yang T, Li C, Song W. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41:44–49. doi: 10.1177/1071100719875964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.A modified all-inside arthroscopic remnant-preserving technique of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: medium-term clinical and radiologic results comparable with open reconstruction. Zhang K, Khan AA, Dai H, Li Y, Tao T, Jiang Y, Gui J. Int Orthop. 2020;44:2155–2165. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04773-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.All-inside arthroscopic modified Broström technique to repair anterior talofibular ligament provides a similar outcome compared with open Broström-Gould procedure. Zhou YF, Zhang ZZ, Zhang HZ, Li WP, Shen HY, Song B. Arthroscopy. 2021;37:268–279. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lateral ankle instability and the Brostrom-Gould procedure. Keller M, Grossman J, Caron M, Mendicino RW. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:513–520. doi: 10.1016/s1067-2516(96)80123-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.The effect of an ossicle of the lateral malleolus on ligament reconstruction of chronic lateral ankle instability. Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim YS, Lee JW. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:191–196. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Long-term results after modified Brostrom procedure without calcaneofibular ligament reconstruction. Lee KT, Park YU, Kim JS, Kim JB, Kim KC, Kang SK. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:153–157. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Evaluation of a modified Broström-Gould procedure for treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability: a retrospective study with critical analysis of outcome scoring. Buerer Y, Winkler M, Burn A, Chopra S, Crevoisier X. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.An analysis of outcome measures following the Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Brodsky AR, O'Malley MJ, Bohne WH, Deland JA, Kennedy JG. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:816–819. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chronic lateral instability: arthroscopic findings and long-term results. Ferkel RD, Chams RN. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:24–31. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ankle arthroscopy for lateral ankle instability. Labib SA, Slone HS. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;14:25–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Periosteal flap augmentation of the modified Broström-Gould procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Chew CP, Koo KO, Lie DT. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018;26 doi: 10.1177/2309499018757530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Peroneal tendon irritation after arthroscopic modified Broström procedure: a case report. Lee YK, Lee HS, Cho WJ, et al. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Clinical outcomes of the modified Broström technique in the management of chronic ankle instability after early, intermediate, and delayed presentation. Hassan S, Thurston D, Sian T, Shah R, Aziz A, Kothari P. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:685–688. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Arthroscopic anatomical repair of anterior talofibular ligament for chronic lateral instability of the ankle: medium- and long-term functional follow-up. Feng SM, Sun QQ, Wang AG, Chang BQ, Cheng J. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32124530/ Orthop Surg. 2020;12:505–514. doi: 10.1111/os.12651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morphology of anterior talofibular ligament after arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair. Hagio T, Yoshimura I, Kanazawa K, Minokawa S, Yamamoto T. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41:993–1001. doi: 10.1177/1071100720920610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.A novel technique of arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair using a knotless suture anchor. Kanzaki N, Chinzei N, Yamashita T, Kumai T, Kuroda R. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8 doi: 10.1177/2325967120962079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Arthroscopic Broström-Gould repair has comparable radiological and clinical outcomes compared to traditional open Broström-Gould repair in high-demand patients. Baek JH, Kim JH, Jeong BO. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:2208–2215. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07289-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Arthroscopic modified Broström procedure achieves faster return to sports than open procedure for chronic ankle instability. Hou ZC, Su T, Ao YF, et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:3570–3578. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06961-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Presence of subfibular ossicle does not affect the outcome of arthroscopic modified Broström procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability. Kim WJ, Lee HS, Moon SI, et al. Arthroscopy. 2019;35:953–960. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Approach to ankle instability in patients with a negative ankle MRI: a case series. Alnejadi WK, Aljefri A, Alharbi ZM, Saif S, Nejaim K, Almutairi M, Batouk O. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Arthroscopic repair of lateral ankle ligament for chronic lateral ankle instability: a systematic review. Brown AJ, Shimozono Y, Hurley ET, Kennedy JG. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:2497–2503. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Arthroscopic repair of lateral ankle ligament complex by suture anchor. Wang J, Hua Y, Chen S, Li H, Zhang J, Li Y. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:766–773. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.All-inside arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament repair for ankle instability with a knotless suture anchor technique. Vega J, Golanó P, Pellegrino A, Rabat E, Peña F. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:1701–1709. doi: 10.1177/1071100713502322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Modified Broström repair with suture tape augmentation for lateral ankle instability: a systematic review. Lewis TL, Joseph A, Patel A, Ahluwalia R, Ray R. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27:278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES